Intro to Constructivist Theory, pt. 1

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 6 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 15

  • @dnexon
    @dnexon  14 ปีที่แล้ว

    @EstateSoundMatt You're welcome. Fields often develop their own terminology and vocabulary to talk about the same concepts. Sometimes they borrow ideas and rename them; sometimes they borrow names but the meaning drifts/changes. Are there particular things you were thinking of?

  • @abdallahsalisu4714
    @abdallahsalisu4714 10 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    This is brilliant presentation from an IR Constructivist perspective. Iam a PhD student in Austria... I am working on a theoretical thesis in which I am using rule based constructivism as my main theoretical approach. I would like to know if you have some help in this regard. thank you

  • @bennyke1979
    @bennyke1979 14 ปีที่แล้ว

    I consider myself a rationalist, and never really understood constructivism. This lecture however gave me a much better understanding. Thanks!

  • @UlTrA2GaMeR
    @UlTrA2GaMeR 14 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video, keep it up professor Nexon!

  • @dnexon
    @dnexon  15 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    TH-cam keeps on eating my reply. Let me try again.
    What I mean is that the borders of the French state (1) include people who do not consider themselves "French" and (2) do not include everyone who considers him or herself "French."
    Anyway, you must realize that responding to youtube queries isn't at the top of my list of things to do, and that a delay of a week is not all that long in the grand scheme of things.

  • @dnexon
    @dnexon  15 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm happy to do that... if you can tell me what you mean.

  • @imegatrone
    @imegatrone 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    Your Video Is Very Useful Sharing A lecture I recorded for "Introduction to International Politics" on Constructivism. The short supplement on typifications is best viewed before this series.

  • @EstateSoundMatt
    @EstateSoundMatt 14 ปีที่แล้ว

    He's talking about volume... It's fine. PS THANK YOU FOR THIS VIDEO. I'm curious why so much of IR theory terminology is different from philosophical terminology. So many of the ideas are the same.

  • @USELESSCOM
    @USELESSCOM 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    sometimes they just want to keep their right to be a separate discipline... and make "cross (cultural) understanding" difficult :-). Also I think PS often looks down on sociology and anthropology, so if they borrow they try to cover it.

  • @SAMAR-1
    @SAMAR-1 16 ปีที่แล้ว

    thanks for this video!

  • @thegeffc
    @thegeffc 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    i enjoyed this vid

  • @starry4sky
    @starry4sky 14 ปีที่แล้ว

    @brevicaudate Yes, it could be argued that the French culture and Islamic cultures find it difficult to work alongside one another but that could be less to do with their compatibility and more to do with the xenophobia/islamophobia of the French. I reject the idea that muslims "have been flooding through [France's] borders...completely eradicating its culture and establishing their own."

    • @devinngeorge
      @devinngeorge 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      starry4sky islamaphobia does not exist, a created or popularized by the Muslim brotherhood and it's foreign sponsored groups in the west

  • @chad3225698
    @chad3225698 12 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    now if you would just give a transcript of the video... if you know what i mean. hahaha

  • @MsZuri1
    @MsZuri1 14 ปีที่แล้ว

    U have great points but u talk so fast!!!!!!!