Fabricator here. I know of zero industrial metal lathes that could handle anything like that weight, certainly not at any given speed to carve it effectively. If we wanted make those pillars today of solid granite would require massive custom machines.
There was an engineer who examined some of these sites(Egypt too) and asked if it could be accomplished with todays technology. He said some yes, some no. But on the yes ones he explained it would not be cost effective. Way too much $, effort and time.
I've been carving limestone, laying 200lb blocks. Using water saws, and a whole variety of power tools. It takes for ever to polish and limestone is soft compared to granite. For the life of me I can not understand how people with modern experience in the field are never consulted in the concoction of the academic theories. It's absurd. That granite column is not possible by hand, it just can't be done. Not that level of precision, has to be a lathe. And Lord only knows what size of lathe that would require.
@@jesselofson18 i found an indian made stone, it was near perfectly round and had a raised ridge around it . to carve granite, you use granite or something harder . as for time and $$ they had no $$ and if the king said do you did or you did not eat . and to get a straight line you used a string , they weren't morons like briens fans
@@MegaTriumph1 he wasn't bigger then live. He was a junkie. He needed a cocktail of different opiates every day to be the person he was. Never saw a picture of him in Baalbek.
Great presentation Brien, and again we see the contradictions in the Workmanship and the stories that we were taught. Seems like life is full contradictions no matter who you listen too...
If they don't stick to it, they'd have to rewrite hundreds of archaeological books, papers, lectures and thesis published over the past 100 years. Easier to just stay the course.
This video has been debunked by a historian. For ex. row of several small wholes on the "large stones made by ancient people" was a known and well documentated technique for the romans when they moved these large stones. The romans even made drawings on how they did it with the tools and the manpower, and we have found the tools. And the stones are not "800 tons" either. Where did that numbers come from? And who are "they"? Science is not a club or an common enemy. Have you ever talked to a scientist or read any published papers on this subject? They dont claim what this guy is saying they do, and they do not all agree either. If you can find just a fragment of evidence to support a theory, you can publish a paper and possible get more scientists interested. For ex. if you find the drawings, you find the tools, and you find the stones....that would be great evidence. And they have done exactly that. And even this tour guide have to admit that romans did know who to move very large stones over large distances. So....what are we left with that support the claims in this video? Nothing except some tour tickets ($) and a story about some lost civilation that generates views ($) on YT. And my guess based on your answer, is that you have never read a paper on the subject so you even know what "the academics say". And yet.....you laugh. :)
The row of small holes you see in the large stones (in the video) was a well knows technique used by the romans to move large stones like this. Not sure why he claims they are made by some unknows ancient people with magic tools we cant explain. There is no evidence for that, they have all the signatures (like the holes) to be roman work....and they are found at a site we know romans did allot of work. And they found the tools. And who said it was with "great ease"? If someone in 2000 years found a buried supercomputer, would one automaticly claim that we must have made it with great ease? They had amazing engineers, allot of manpower and generations of knowledge about stone work. Romans was extremely tallented with stone work. Travel to Italy and look at some of it - it is amazing. No diamond or laser tools used for none of it either. ;)
@@Jammin6796 Well Jamine, these stones weigh more then 800 tons. I don`t think that wooden pullies and rope these stones are able to move. In our times we have steel cables, steel pullies and hydraulics and it would still be quite a job to move a stone of 800 or 1000 tons.
@@1206anton everyone agrees that the Romans moved 500+ ton obilisks with ease.. what would be any different method to move 800 tons... plus the method is well documented.. yet this guy refuses to mention that in any of his so called lectures...
You do great work Bri, speaking of high technology rather than a lath to construct those columns perhaps a machine capable of maneuvering around the stone to cut it with great precision was used.
flexible sleeve with diamond on the inside, tightened as required and moved around the outside in a sanding motion. Experimentation was probably required. animal skin sleeve animal glue, ropes. Roughing out first. Wouldn't this work?
60 hits then move to next mark, 60 hits again and move to the next mark. Brien is a shill and liar . if the pregnant woman stone was cut with ''a machine'' why was not the bottom cut ?
Great presentation, Brien. You are a rock solid researcher. No pun intended. Keep it up. The world needs more curious people, just like you. PS: Apparently, some titles are completely overrated.
Brien, what was that? You seemed as bored as I was listening to your talk. Bored me to tears, and here again, and here again...a big block on the bottom and small blocks on top...etc...etc...etc...!
Very interesting. One should think that "standard academia" would be constantly present to figure out the obvious difference between the achievements of much different cultures. As they are not - and as they obviously ignore this mystery, it's more appropriate to name that group - gate keepers. It's a tragic fact that policy and stupidity corrupt the history of humanity.
I wonder if it will be similar like with the findings of Dinasaur’s and all of a sudden the tools will be found, or if the future will bring proof of Erich van Däniken’s theory? Why is it that we find ancient sites created in way to similar and created using obviously same technologies around the globe?
@@steve-o6413 I don’t know if you ever have participated on archeological excavations, I have, however long time ago. I’m positive with all the new technologies we will find them, if they are around and with people like Brien Förster we will get to know about. There are still undiscovered sites in the Amazon, when I was there I stumbled across a channel built out of granite stones. Sadly my job didn’t allow me to research it any further. And if we don’t find’em Erich’s buddies from outer space took’em back home!😉 Once technology offers a way of dating granite and other stones we will get a step closer.
@@samaipata4756 the only excavating I've done was at a Construction site for Electrical conduit and vaults for transformers. My point was they could excavate more but the Government's say no for a reason, just like the tunnel System under the Pyramid is extensive but they never say anything about it for fear of too many questions...
@@steve-o6413 I got your point. But the fact that over 80% of all treasures found in our museums have been discovered by treasure hunters and not by educated government employed archaeologists makes me feel quite positive that if those tools ever can be found, governments will not be able to hide the truth.
Daniken’s theory is already known to be true by professionals. There’s money in it so it is kept secret. As for the tools they have long been destroyed
I heard that this area where known to be occupied by giants, the people feared them and it was mentioned in holy books, the height of the column might give some indication of their height and strength. I also noticed that the cutting marks in the granite have steel rust on the outer edge but the deep edge didn’t have any rust marks so probably the steel was attached to another type of material that does not rust.
I'll never understand why some archeologists think roman era building could do this. Don't get me wrong they're a credit to modern day building styles but roman built in sections to produce a large build not like this
Been fascinated with Baalbek for years. I think the romans did even less there than you give them credit for. I don’t think there’s anyway they built the giant columns with 6 ft sections. The columns are just way too massive to be Roman. And the stones on top of the 90 ft columns are 200 tons. No way the romans did that
@@carmineredd1198 yeah listening to this there is so much speculation half truths and unanswered questions that I don’t see how anyone could taken this guy seriously.
As cliche as it sounds, this is probably Atlantean work. We have the story of Plato & how Solon received the story from the Egyptians. We have the Egyptian account (again via Plato) of how they were a colony of Atlantis. If this is true, then we have the massive construction of the Pyramids who was likely done by the Atlanteans as well. Keep up the good work Brian.
1st thoughts on the right side of the "pregnant lady", had anyone taken core samples of the dirt? See where it originates, there or was it buried from outside sources at some time.
For me personally this is one of the most magnificent ancient stone megalithic enigmas on the planet. Highly advanced technology was used here. More advanced then Roman and Egyptian combined. And the Tech has been lost :(
Mt. Herman very important that fallen Angels did land and plotted Angel and woman and brought forth Giants who built All Megalithic sights around the World
Do you guys realize they don't teach those things for us in school at all. Because they don't have the answer for everything, such things like ancient technology can't be explained by academics. We need to be open-minded and understand that somethings in this world are beyond the knowledge that we once were taught. Even though I have my opinion about who or what made those megalithic constructions (which I think are the nephilims and fallen angels mentioned in the Bible) I still don't have the exactly answer or prove about the topic. If there is something we can learn or know for sure is that in the past there was a lost civilization that we are not taught in school nowadays. We have so many evidences about it in this channel, not only by the megalithic constructions but also because of the elongated skulls founded in many places around the world, which we have the DNA test results already. I love history, that's one of my favorite topics. By the way, I respect everyone's opinion or idea about who/what could have done those megalithic constructions.
I'm really curious how they would have pulled the stone out of the rock. What kind of cranes should they have used for this weight to replace it? I think it is impossible to use wooden cranes and rope for this weight.
Completely off topic Brien, but since this is in your neck of the woods, I was wondering if you might be so kind as to go to this site and see what you can see etc . Name of the site is Las Aldas, not far from you . Seems like an unexplored and untouched site, would be good to get there before the quacks completely destroy it . Maybe take some compass readings, check alignments, etc. Thanks again Brien for all the work you do !!
I get the feeling somehow' that this sight and this stone were part of a structure Much larger than the stones present today" ""Babak Space Station". Welcome Earthlings.
Pretty obvious that a culture that can make 1200 ton cube of Granite can also make a perfectly round 60 foot granite pillar or smaller Stone Roller to Roll the 1200 ton Cube on. Trees dont work but stone rollers do.
May be an advancerd civilisation who just simply left the planet. What would extraterrestrials be doing here at that time? I don`t think they would build temples here.
Except for the fact that "Dr". David Miano will badmouth you on his highly comments-policed channel and tell you the ancients could have precisely chopped up this huge stone with a bronze toothpick and a "bashing stone" and transported such thousand+ ton monoliths all over the place with some slaves, some rope, a bucket of sand and some water to moisten it. Apparently they just glide along effortlessly like that. I kid you not! Who knew!?
: ) ha,ha,ha I know exactly what your talking about I've seen so many videos saying how easy it was for them to do it. Wiping slaves that could easily overpower them because of the vast numbers needed...
No it's many thousands of other educated people that disagree with Brien too. Remember Brien himself says every single academic laughs at his conclusions.
Maybe the holes at the ends of the columns were attachment points for connecting to a lathe like machine? Can't see if there are holes on the opposite end that may match.
Post flood construction .. G sub c tools used ... tools to use .. the power to curve would be weaker .. Benjamin Franklin's charge to space discharge .. stress strain to induction would be different .. the Atlantis tool Mer looks standard .. no mortar .. interesting to Art
Which passage does the Bible say the fallen angels fell on mount hermon because we just looked it up in Bible gateway search and nothing of the sort... We did find this though... Psalm 133:3 It is like the dew of Hermon, which falls on the mountains of Zion! For there the Lord has commanded the blessing, life forevermore.
Maybe they did use diamonds? For what requires diamond level technology, like maybe that's what they used to cuz granite and basalt and that's where semi modern and modern times artificially value gems like diamonds. Because we knew there's uses for them, but not sure what. Also maybe these places are reported on Because the technology itself, i.e diamonds, were stolen. And the thieves dont want to be spoken about
...AND... why the hell would anyone destroy granite-columns, of all things, and in that very, seemingly, repetitive and uniform-fashion? Seems like, quite a difficult and pointless exercise in wasted-effort and energy. I'd love to believe that an ancient cataclysm were the cause, and in many/most of the cases to which Mr. Foerster indicates that to be a possible explanation for the damages and destructions we see at many of the sites he visits and shares with us all, I tend to believe it, as well. However, in this case, it sure looks like someone dismantled those many-columns, in that single scattered-field, with intention and in a fashion which makes it easier to remove them, all in their similarly-sized di-sections.
Hi Brien...I think you know my theory that there was giant creatures that drowned and there bodies were cut up and some ground up into building materials. It is shown in Chinese carvings grinding people up. At 15:25 I believe that is ground up flesh and bone and tendon (red granite) and used to make concrete. The exact same material as the base stones that mated up with the inner UNEVEN blocks... the only way that was possible was to POUR the stone into a form and it filled the jagged void.....it is the surface polished cap stones I pointed out in your vid on the pyramid. Thank you my friend great work and time to consider my claims I think but up to you.
Roger - theories have to be supported by evidence. I know that evidence is not something you are familiar with. Sitting in a dark room, pointing at things you are utterly clueless about and have never seen yourself and making up nonsense doesn’t classify as a theory. Sorry. Leave science to those that understand it. You clearly never will.
Idea how they moved the 800 ton blockes: in the quarry they build them with a zylindical shape. Then rolled them somehow to the building site. There they made the stones rectangular.
@@JJJJJVVVVVLLLLL Depends on the ground. Like is it a hard ground or a soft and sandy ground. And if driving a car downhill you know you should go in low gear to have break funktiion by the engine.
They used frequency resonance to unlock objects from the effects of gravity...sounds crazy but is scientifically barely scratching the surface of what's possible
Work stoppage was because the union went on strike. The laborers walked off the job because their contract had expired and there was not a fair collective bargaining agreement brought forth from their employers. In the end the employers broke the Union and tried to hire non-union labor which was in no way skilled enough to take on this type of task thus the Stone was abandoned.🤔
@@lowersaxon the Greeks called it Byblos but the city itself is thousands of years older than the Greeks. And the Phoenician name of the city is Gebal. This is why the modern name in Jbeil.
People standing on the giant blocks at Baalbek look like ants on top of a brick.
Fabricator here. I know of zero industrial metal lathes that could handle anything like that weight, certainly not at any given speed to carve it effectively. If we wanted make those pillars today of solid granite would require massive custom machines.
There was an engineer who examined some of these sites(Egypt too) and asked if it could be accomplished with todays technology. He said some yes, some no. But on the yes ones he explained it would not be cost effective. Way too much $, effort and time.
I've been carving limestone, laying 200lb blocks. Using water saws, and a whole variety of power tools. It takes for ever to polish and limestone is soft compared to granite. For the life of me I can not understand how people with modern experience in the field are never consulted in the concoction of the academic theories. It's absurd.
That granite column is not possible by hand, it just can't be done. Not that level of precision, has to be a lathe. And Lord only knows what size of lathe that would require.
@@jesselofson18 i found an indian made stone, it was near perfectly round and had a raised ridge around it . to carve granite, you use granite or something harder . as for time and $$ they had no $$ and if the king said do you did or you did not eat . and to get a straight line you used a string , they weren't morons like briens fans
It's crazy Baalbek is completely ignored. It is the most obvious proof something happened in the past we can't explain.
Everything is off the charts like looking at a Pyramid and trying to conceive you how they did it...
Hitler visited Baalbek and used its structure for all his huge backdrops making him larger then life.
@@MegaTriumph1 he wasn't bigger then live. He was a junkie. He needed a cocktail of different opiates every day to be the person he was. Never saw a picture of him in Baalbek.
Then when you find that it was Baal's aka Moloch and that's the main deity worshipped at bohemian grove, makes you wonder who's controlling this world
it is true! Something tells me people lived there!
Thank you Brian for your work on shedding some light on our actual history.
Newearth lady has videos of all kinds of crazy megalithic sites, with massive stones cut and used as seawalls and such.
Link?
@@theemeraldfox7779 th-cam.com/video/S4kqhp-ilsg/w-d-xo.html
Great presentation Brien, and again we see the contradictions in the Workmanship and the stories that we were taught. Seems like life is full contradictions no matter who you listen too...
Great view. Thanks for sharing.
Always have to laugh when he gets to the part "The Academics say..."
That's their $tory and they're $ticking to it.
If they don't stick to it, they'd have to rewrite hundreds of archaeological books, papers, lectures and thesis published over the past 100 years. Easier to just stay the course.
@@headshotsongs9465
That's true, lol
This video has been debunked by a historian. For ex. row of several small wholes on the "large stones made by ancient people" was a known and well documentated technique for the romans when they moved these large stones. The romans even made drawings on how they did it with the tools and the manpower, and we have found the tools.
And the stones are not "800 tons" either. Where did that numbers come from?
And who are "they"? Science is not a club or an common enemy. Have you ever talked to a scientist or read any published papers on this subject? They dont claim what this guy is saying they do, and they do not all agree either.
If you can find just a fragment of evidence to support a theory, you can publish a paper and possible get more scientists interested. For ex. if you find the drawings, you find the tools, and you find the stones....that would be great evidence. And they have done exactly that. And even this tour guide have to admit that romans did know who to move very large stones over large distances.
So....what are we left with that support the claims in this video? Nothing except some tour tickets ($) and a story about some lost civilation that generates views ($) on YT.
And my guess based on your answer, is that you have never read a paper on the subject so you even know what "the academics say".
And yet.....you laugh. :)
@@haknys One word. Erosion.
10,000 years vs 1000.
@@haknys
A historian.... Hmmm..
Who? When? Where?...
I doubt these mysteries ever get solved. So maddening!
Great photographic material!!
That is the question.
How could they move these kind of weights and get them exactly in place, apperently with great ease.
The row of small holes you see in the large stones (in the video) was a well knows technique used by the romans to move large stones like this.
Not sure why he claims they are made by some unknows ancient people with magic tools we cant explain. There is no evidence for that, they have all the signatures (like the holes) to be roman work....and they are found at a site we know romans did allot of work. And they found the tools.
And who said it was with "great ease"? If someone in 2000 years found a buried supercomputer, would one automaticly claim that we must have made it with great ease? They had amazing engineers, allot of manpower and generations of knowledge about stone work.
Romans was extremely tallented with stone work. Travel to Italy and look at some of it - it is amazing. No diamond or laser tools used for none of it either. ;)
ummmm have you ever heard of pullies.. they have existed for thousands of years..
@@Jammin6796
Well Jamine, these stones weigh more then 800 tons. I don`t think that wooden pullies and rope these stones are able to move.
In our times we have steel cables, steel pullies and hydraulics and it would still be quite a job to move a stone of 800 or 1000 tons.
@@1206anton everyone agrees that the Romans moved 500+ ton obilisks with ease.. what would be any different method to move 800 tons... plus the method is well documented.. yet this guy refuses to mention that in any of his so called lectures...
You did not gave me an answer on my question.
I cannot find this on internet, so send me a link.
You do great work Bri, speaking of high technology rather than a lath to construct those columns perhaps a machine capable of maneuvering around the stone to cut it with great precision was used.
You'd probably need to rough cut it round first but some of the radius I've seen this wouldn't be a problem...
flexible sleeve with diamond on the inside, tightened as required and moved around the outside in a sanding motion. Experimentation was probably required. animal skin sleeve animal glue, ropes. Roughing out first. Wouldn't this work?
I think they were much sophisticated than that
60 hits then move to next mark, 60 hits again and move to the next mark. Brien is a shill and liar . if the pregnant woman stone was cut with ''a machine'' why was not the bottom cut ?
Great presentation, Brien. You are a rock solid researcher. No pun intended. Keep it up.
The world needs more curious people, just like you. PS: Apparently, some titles are completely overrated.
Brien, what was that? You seemed as bored as I was listening to your talk. Bored me to tears, and here again, and here again...a big block on the bottom and small blocks on top...etc...etc...etc...!
@@michaeldrasic7587 so why you have to attach your comment to mine ? It could very well stand alone.
Slideshows are the best imo
Excellent presentation BRIAN
‘Twas Giants
And/or magic ...
@@LeeGee magic is not real
Yup Giant Machines..!
Pre-Adamites and megallithics in the pre-Ice Age 12,000s/10,000s BC
Byblos is also located in Lebanon. It's also one of the oldest continuously inhabited cities in the world.
Very interesting. One should think that "standard academia" would be constantly present to figure out the obvious difference between the achievements of much different cultures. As they are not - and as they obviously ignore this mystery, it's more appropriate to name that group - gate keepers. It's a tragic fact that policy and stupidity corrupt the history of humanity.
Write them a letter.
@@mierdaguiatouritico4003 Yes, a template for their resignation.
Sadly true
Very very interesting. I follow you as much as I can. Thank you for your work. It’s needed.
Thank you for your videos.. I so look forward to each one..
I wonder if it will be similar like with the findings of Dinasaur’s and all of a sudden the tools will be found, or if the future will bring proof of Erich van Däniken’s theory?
Why is it that we find ancient sites created in way to similar and created using obviously same technologies around the globe?
I doubt that we'd ever find them if you think logical about it, otherwise they would be pointing out all the inconsistencies found around the World...
@@steve-o6413 I don’t know if you ever have participated on archeological excavations, I have, however long time ago. I’m positive with all the new technologies we will find them, if they are around and with people like Brien Förster we will get to know about. There are still undiscovered sites in the Amazon, when I was there I stumbled across a channel built out of granite stones. Sadly my job didn’t allow me to research it any further. And if we don’t find’em Erich’s buddies from outer space took’em back home!😉
Once technology offers a way of dating granite and other stones we will get a step closer.
@@samaipata4756 the only excavating I've done was at a Construction site for Electrical conduit and vaults for transformers. My point was they could excavate more but the Government's say no for a reason, just like the tunnel System under the Pyramid is extensive but they never say anything about it for fear of too many questions...
@@steve-o6413 I got your point. But the fact that over 80% of all treasures found in our museums have been discovered by treasure hunters and not by educated government employed archaeologists makes me feel quite positive that if those tools ever can be found, governments will not be able to hide the truth.
Daniken’s theory is already known to be true by professionals. There’s money in it so it is kept secret. As for the tools they have long been destroyed
I heard that this area where known to be occupied by giants, the people feared them and it was mentioned in holy books, the height of the column might give some indication of their height and strength. I also noticed that the cutting marks in the granite have steel rust on the outer edge but the deep edge didn’t have any rust marks so probably the steel was attached to another type of material that does not rust.
I'll never understand why some archeologists think roman era building could do this. Don't get me wrong they're a credit to modern day building styles but roman built in sections to produce a large build not like this
Might want to take a look at the work done under Herrod
Bingo!
Been fascinated with Baalbek for years. I think the romans did even less there than you give them credit for. I don’t think there’s anyway they built the giant columns with 6 ft sections. The columns are just way too massive to be Roman. And the stones on top of the 90 ft columns are 200 tons. No way the romans did that
And yet they put the giant stones In the temple in Jerusalem…. Nobody questions that.
@@spiderknight9893 we... must ... ignore ... the ... truth ... because brien has books to sell
@@carmineredd1198 yeah listening to this there is so much speculation half truths and unanswered questions that I don’t see how anyone could taken this guy seriously.
How,really How,can anyone say this evidence is only a few thousands of years old? The obvious is there that a much older time,is unknown.
Once again thank you
As cliche as it sounds, this is probably Atlantean work. We have the story of Plato & how Solon received the story from the Egyptians. We have the Egyptian account (again via Plato) of how they were a colony of Atlantis. If this is true, then we have the massive construction of the Pyramids who was likely done by the Atlanteans as well. Keep up the good work Brian.
1st thoughts on the right side of the "pregnant lady", had anyone taken core samples of the dirt? See where it originates, there or was it buried from outside sources at some time.
where did all them rock come from ? Brien is a liar and shill
Awsome powerpoint😊
Tons of stones
so, basically...stons?
Has the mediteranian been checked out for quarries? Could it be an ancient quarry? Black sea too?
I have not heared about any, but here could be somewhere, of course... Or they have built something on top of it... A city???
For me personally this is one of the most magnificent ancient stone megalithic enigmas on the planet.
Highly advanced technology was used here.
More advanced then Roman and Egyptian combined.
And the Tech has been lost :(
Wrong! 😂🤡🤡🤡🤡
Fascinated by the scale of Baalbek, an enemy of mankind
Exactly they were building massively against something!
Mt. Herman very important that fallen Angels did land and plotted Angel and woman and brought forth Giants who built All Megalithic sights around the World
Bingo!
Do you guys realize they don't teach those things for us in school at all. Because they don't have the answer for everything, such things like ancient technology can't be explained by academics. We need to be open-minded and understand that somethings in this world are beyond the knowledge that we once were taught. Even though I have my opinion about who or what made those megalithic constructions (which I think are the nephilims and fallen angels mentioned in the Bible) I still don't have the exactly answer or prove about the topic. If there is something we can learn or know for sure is that in the past there was a lost civilization that we are not taught in school nowadays. We have so many evidences about it in this channel, not only by the megalithic constructions but also because of the elongated skulls founded in many places around the world, which we have the DNA test results already. I love history, that's one of my favorite topics. By the way, I respect everyone's opinion or idea about who/what could have done those megalithic constructions.
Agreed brother!
Another great video 👍🏻
I'm really curious how they would have pulled the stone out of the rock.
What kind of cranes should they have used for this weight to replace it? I think it is impossible to use wooden cranes and rope for this weight.
I need more examples of scale!
It was very well known that Phoenicians used to trade with Eygptians. They used to export them cedar wood and receive granite stone
Thank you
Amazing 👍 seems like proof of fallen angel technology.
Always amazing information! Love it!
Any catastrophic evidence at Byblos?
Lol maybe a world wide flood
Completely off topic Brien, but since this is in your neck of the woods, I was wondering if you might be so kind as to go to this site and see what you can see etc . Name of the site is Las Aldas, not far from you . Seems like an unexplored and untouched site, would be good to get there before the quacks completely destroy it . Maybe take some compass readings, check alignments, etc. Thanks again Brien for all the work you do !!
Love the new intro!!
What happened to the Malta trip? Did it get postponed or did I miss it?
postponed
I get the feeling somehow' that this sight and this stone were part of a structure Much larger than the stones present today" ""Babak Space Station". Welcome Earthlings.
Its funny that they are on land but what was their purpose?? I know but mgs get blocks everytime
SHAPE AND FORM
Pretty obvious that a culture that can make 1200 ton cube of Granite can also make a perfectly round 60 foot granite pillar or smaller Stone Roller to Roll the 1200 ton Cube on. Trees dont work but stone rollers do.
Amazing all these ancient ruins are still here. Dont have too many in the US.
What was the megaliths trying to build
Regardless of the mystery...I think it just pisses modern engineers off...ha ha.
*I've got one picture in here of a 7 foot pointed skull and reports of 75 foot angels in heaven Brian ..*
Where's it at,your proof?
May be an advancerd civilisation who just simply left the planet.
What would extraterrestrials be doing here at that time? I don`t think they would build temples here.
Don't think no constructions ever were temples...
Could you imagine if the “cataclysm” never happened and we were 12,000 years more advanced in their technology instead of ours today?
Inform us of your next visit to Baalbek it will be my pleasure to meet you there 🇱🇧🇱🇧
Aside from modern bombs, how could destruction on this scale be achieved?
(catastrophe) (Katastrophe) (كارثه) (catástrofe) (catastrophe)
ssooo... kool ... thx
need a drone to get a top side view , i like to model in games to reconstruct this place would be fun and alot of parts i see are like lego parts.
there were giants in those days
Phoenician giants moved the blocks.
Except for the fact that "Dr". David Miano will badmouth you on his highly comments-policed channel and tell you the ancients could have precisely chopped up this huge stone with a bronze toothpick and a "bashing stone" and transported such thousand+ ton monoliths all over the place with some slaves, some rope, a bucket of sand and some water to moisten it. Apparently they just glide along effortlessly like that. I kid you not! Who knew!?
: ) ha,ha,ha I know exactly what your talking about I've seen so many videos saying how easy it was for them to do it. Wiping slaves that could easily overpower them because of the vast numbers needed...
No it's many thousands of other educated people that disagree with Brien too. Remember Brien himself says every single academic laughs at his conclusions.
@@mierdaguiatouritico4003
Brand new account. no posts. no videos, etc. HELLO DAVID!
@@esotericist nope
♥☺♥
subtitulos en español porfavor gracias
Maybe the holes at the ends of the columns were attachment points for connecting to a lathe like machine? Can't see if there are holes on the opposite end that may match.
Totally agree, Ronald. Opposite end may only need one hole, accommodating the spin.
@@John__67 it could also be a vertical lathe instead of a horizontal...
Seriously lol,where's the so called lathe?
A Greek rumor to have made a sphere .. is very interesting.
Post flood construction .. G sub c tools used ... tools to use .. the power to curve would be weaker .. Benjamin Franklin's charge to space discharge .. stress strain to induction would be different .. the Atlantis tool Mer looks standard .. no mortar .. interesting to Art
I have a question, have u been to the russian megalithic structures? Just curious :)
Which passage does the Bible say the fallen angels fell on mount hermon because we just looked it up in Bible gateway search and nothing of the sort...
We did find this though...
Psalm 133:3
It is like the dew of Hermon,
which falls on the mountains of Zion!
For there the Lord has commanded the blessing,
life forevermore.
Love the opening!
Maybe they did use diamonds? For what requires diamond level technology, like maybe that's what they used to cuz granite and basalt and that's where semi modern and modern times artificially value gems like diamonds. Because we knew there's uses for them, but not sure what. Also maybe these places are reported on Because the technology itself, i.e diamonds, were stolen. And the thieves dont want to be spoken about
I wonder how many people write Brian instead of Brien.
...AND... why the hell would anyone destroy granite-columns, of all things, and in that very, seemingly, repetitive and uniform-fashion?
Seems like, quite a difficult and pointless exercise in wasted-effort and energy.
I'd love to believe that an ancient cataclysm were the cause, and in many/most of the cases to which Mr. Foerster indicates that to be a possible explanation for the damages and destructions we see at many of the sites he visits and shares with us all, I tend to believe it, as well.
However, in this case, it sure looks like someone dismantled those many-columns, in that single scattered-field, with intention and in a fashion which makes it easier to remove them, all in their similarly-sized di-sections.
Hi Brien...I think you know my theory that there was giant creatures that drowned and there bodies were cut up and some ground up into building materials. It is shown in Chinese carvings grinding people up. At 15:25 I believe that is ground up flesh and bone and tendon (red granite) and used to make concrete.
The exact same material as the base stones that mated up with the inner UNEVEN blocks... the only way that was possible was to POUR the stone into a form and it filled the jagged void.....it is the surface polished cap stones I pointed out in your vid on the pyramid. Thank you my friend great work and time to consider my claims I think but up to you.
That’s ridiculous
@@Jbo2000 he's Captain Batcrap.
Lmao 🤡🤣🤡🤡
They could something, we not yet can...
Roger - theories have to be supported by evidence. I know that evidence is not something you are familiar with. Sitting in a dark room, pointing at things you are utterly clueless about and have never seen yourself and making up nonsense doesn’t classify as a theory. Sorry. Leave science to those that understand it. You clearly never will.
Today shld.show Us without a doubt that We have always been Lied too..
wtf @ that intro Brien, lol
Has anybody made a reconstruction
Didn't think to type 3d balbeck on a search?
Talking about the old megalithic not the roman reconstruction
@@arthurbrown4520 the Roman's did the big stuff.
@@mierdaguiatouritico4003 lol no they did not!
Well hell no
B dawg
Idea how they moved the 800 ton blockes: in the quarry they build them with a zylindical shape. Then rolled them somehow to the building site. There they made the stones rectangular.
better be careful rolling em downhill
@@JJJJJVVVVVLLLLL Depends on the ground. Like is it a hard ground or a soft and sandy ground. And if driving a car downhill you know you should go in low gear to have break funktiion by the engine.
@@tommytalker3416 The big block in the quarry is rectangular in profile, not a circle
@@robertminor9297 No shure if the 800 ton blockes came from where the big block was left unfinished.
They used frequency resonance to unlock objects from the effects of gravity...sounds crazy but is scientifically barely scratching the surface of what's possible
Work stoppage was because the union went on strike. The laborers walked off the job because their contract had expired and there was not a fair collective bargaining agreement brought forth from their employers. In the end the employers broke the Union and tried to hire non-union labor which was in no way skilled enough to take on this type of task thus the Stone was abandoned.🤔
Nope
@@brienfoerster 😂
🤣🤣🤣
@@dmett3828 I got a chuckle from it...
🤣🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡
Byblos / biblos (Latin) = books. Byblo/biblo = book.
Its Greek of course.
@@lowersaxon the Greeks called it Byblos but the city itself is thousands of years older than the Greeks. And the Phoenician name of the city is Gebal. This is why the modern name in Jbeil.
This was built and destroyed in the days of noah.
He could be correct about everything, but he makes a ton of assertions...........lol
I don't like the new opening. The skinny glowing alien? WTF? Just my opinion. I doesn't affect my love for the channel, though!
Where are the machines?
Any builder ! Would take there tool's home ☝️👽👌
@@Alikhan-nb2ui In the UK they chuck them after a contract
@@Alikhan-nb2ui yup
@@LeeGee or they get stolen
They go back to the rental yard and they sell them or scrap them if they are old or broken...
It's almost as if they had technology that took advantage of natural laws that we don't know.
That could be the reason authorities are shielding all of this.
Byblos is not in Jordan its in Lebanon mannn
Holy bible=Helios Biblos or Sun Book.
Biblo is Latin, means "book". Biblos = books
@@susannebrunberg4174 Ok Sun Books
🤡