Nietzsche EXPLAINED: The Genealogy of Morals - Ascetic Ideals, Suffering, Will to Nothingness

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 16 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 48

  • @GermanicJennifer
    @GermanicJennifer 4 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    Personally I think this is one of the best channels on TH-cam explaining philosophical works.
    Thanks for this new upload guys! Your work is much appreciated.

    • @WeltgeistYT
      @WeltgeistYT  4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Thank you for the compliment.

  • @a.wenger3964
    @a.wenger3964 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Weltgeist, this is such solid work on your part! This whole series has made me want to re-read the entirety of _Genealogy_ again! Just this video on its own has added a completely new depth to the book, in a way that leaves the impression that there is yet still more, much more to fathom!
    To speak only of this third essay alone, it seems that what makes the ascetic ideal 'bad' is that it's self-negation for no other purpose than to discharge our instinct for cruelty. This can be seen as just another form of decadence, of letting our instincts run wild. It's willful life negation which follows no artistic plan, a will to nothingness! If we were to compare our inner lives to gardens, then this would be the equivalent of intentionally denying water to the flowers and letting the wild weeds run rampant. What would really be the cardinal difference then between this neglected garden and the default state of nature? Wouldn't it be much better to _cultivate_ the garden of our instincts according to our own will, to formulate our lives towards some greater goal after our own taste? It is better when we're honest in this way and thoroughly embrace life as will to power.

    • @WeltgeistYT
      @WeltgeistYT  4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Thank you for the great comment. Nietzsche is all about "discharging strength/power" in his later works. I like your garden analogy.

  • @dionysusyphus
    @dionysusyphus 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Beautifully done, keep up the great work

    • @WeltgeistYT
      @WeltgeistYT  4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Thank you! Will do!

  • @DeadEndFrog
    @DeadEndFrog 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Amazing as always! crimminaly underrated!

  • @joaquingonzalez5095
    @joaquingonzalez5095 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Perfect, I was just looking for someone explaining philosophy in an introductory way and making it easy, usually people make it boring, dense and totally ununderstandable, not to mention wrongly interpreted.
    This channel and the podcast Philosophize This are the best to get into philosophy.
    Thanks

  • @zanamusician
    @zanamusician 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great content, thank you very much! What do you think about the alternative to the ascetic ideal? What would provide us with a better meaning?

  • @simsam133
    @simsam133 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hardest essay from the genealogy in my opinion. This really helped!

  • @leniepenie3419
    @leniepenie3419 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Another great video

  • @garryjones1776
    @garryjones1776 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Enjoying your series, very good work, keep it up.

  • @brennanchaudhry8925
    @brennanchaudhry8925 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent explanation, well structured and produced.

  • @Aniket-m3c
    @Aniket-m3c 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Thank you so much sir, your interpretation was very engaging and convincing . 😇😇
    Best channel ever🙏🙏🙏
    I have one request, please explain what Nietzsche thought about Eastern religions like Hinduism and Buddhism, and how eastern polytheism and western paganism is connected.

    • @WeltgeistYT
      @WeltgeistYT  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Good idea for a video.

  • @Disco0x
    @Disco0x 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    This episode was particularly powerful. Keep it up. Your work is fantastic.

  • @noself1028
    @noself1028 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I've wanted to study Nietzsche more in depth for a while but until now wasn't quite sure how to approach such an endeavor on my own. I'm using your videos as a starting point and will then use your guide for reading Nietzsche's works and the related secondary literature. Thanks for providing such a valuable resource!

  • @erisstewart4236
    @erisstewart4236 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Still amazing videos,
    Good Job.

  • @bchan6742
    @bchan6742 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you so much for this, helped me tackle the book

  • @SPACEDOUT19
    @SPACEDOUT19 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Keep it up, good content here, really well made and really informative

  • @CrazyLinguiniLegs
    @CrazyLinguiniLegs ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Did Nietzsche ever comment on Diogenes? Diogenes embodied an ascetic ideal that was not tied to a hinterwelt; rather, he thought toughening oneself and living on bare necessities was the best way to live here and now in this world.

    • @tearsintherain6311
      @tearsintherain6311 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I remember hearing that he criticized the cynics and the stoics but they were some of his most positively seen Greek philosophers but maybe I’m wrong

    • @tearsintherain6311
      @tearsintherain6311 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Classic*

  • @georgedallas999
    @georgedallas999 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I was having a really hard time understanding this essay, thanks a lot for breaking it down and making it easy to understand!

  • @sallyren5464
    @sallyren5464 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Love your videos 💕💕Thank you

  • @sonnyjim5268
    @sonnyjim5268 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Once again - well done and thank you!

    • @WeltgeistYT
      @WeltgeistYT  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      You're welcome!

    • @sonnyjim5268
      @sonnyjim5268 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@WeltgeistYT In what country do you live? I think the way you speak slowly and clearly is one the strengths of this channel. These ideas can be hard to follow and your presentation style makes it much easier to understand.

  • @supernovaversion3.05
    @supernovaversion3.05 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I read genealogy of morality first and most of things go over my head, but thank you. I will first get a basic grasps all the philosophy than I will attempt genealogy of morality again.(Btw English is not my first language)

  • @istoleyournan6010
    @istoleyournan6010 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for helping me study for my philosophy exam :D

  • @ezravanessen7288
    @ezravanessen7288 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I love your videos and I have a question. Is it supported by nowadays psychology that we have an instinctive pleasure for inflicting cruelty? In spirituality this would be denied because it is caused by the ego. This maxim destroys spiritualism it seems.

    • @a.wenger3964
      @a.wenger3964 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Interesting question. In comparative psychology, or in other words, animal psychology, we see animals exhibit all sorts of behaviors that can only really be classified as deliberate cruelty. Cats, for instance, will play with mice until they die rather than go for the quickest kill. Chimpanzees, when fighting rival bands, have been observed to inflict painful wounds and torture on enemies even after they have clearly submitted. Even human children are often seen doing things like picking off the legs of spiders until they're told not to by their parents. It is of my opinion that this instinct for cruelty is endemic to all life for some evolutionary reason or other, but human beings possess a unique capacity to self edit and suppress instincts for the sake of conformity. This suppression has negative effects on our psychology though, where, as Nietzsche states, this gives rise to the _Bad Conscience_ .

    • @WeltgeistYT
      @WeltgeistYT  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Andrew gave a great answer. You could say Nietzsche is an anti-spiritualist because he denies metaphysics (the Hinterwelt) and posits that the material world is all there is. Then again, there's a lot of debate on this topic.

    • @ezravanessen7288
      @ezravanessen7288 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@a.wenger3964 In rational psychology it is more or less stated that we do bad things because we are confused, misinformed, indoctrinated or deludedby other misconceptions, but that in nature we are good. Nietzsche seems to deny that and if we look at history he seems to be right. I myself am just trying the path of spirituality at the moment (meditation, ego), but I only see dead ends to this endeavour when I think of Nietzsche.

  • @tomato1040
    @tomato1040 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Philosophy, the love of wisdom, like in Solomon, has slips away from an animalistic scientist who suffers in not knowing. When the scientist has measured he/she thinks they know. What remains from the Will isn't a question of Power but not needing It!

  • @Mhamad78978
    @Mhamad78978 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Keep it up for gods sake!

  • @bret6484
    @bret6484 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You always refer to the channel as "we." Might I ask who is involved in the making of these videos?

    • @WeltgeistYT
      @WeltgeistYT  4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Just one guy, it's the royal "we" like you would use in a paper.