Flying Oddities: World's Strangest Planes

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 20 ก.ค. 2024
  • Ugliest Planes Ever to Take Flight" is all about some really odd-looking planes that have flown in the sky. From the Boeing X-32, which looks kind of funny like a bird or a character from a movie, to the British Aerospace Nimrod AEW3 with big radar dishes that make it look strange, this story shows off planes that might not win any beauty contests.
    Learn about the Aero Spacelines Pregnant Guppy, a plane that got its name because it looks like a big, swollen fish. It was really important for carrying big parts of other planes. Then there's the Northrop Tacit Blue, called "the whale" or "the filing cabinet" because of how it looks, but it was a big deal for hiding from radars.
    See other planes too, like the Ilyushin Il-40, the Edgley Optica with its big, bug eyes, and the Messerschmitt Me P1109, a plane that was so out there, it never got built.
    _________________________________________________
    To contact me directly: Dashboardglobal@techie.com
    _________________________________________________
    Our channel is about Aviation.
    We make the best educational aviation videos you've ever seen; my videos are designed to clear misunderstandings about airplanes and explain complicated aviation topics in a simple way.

ความคิดเห็น • 23

  • @HarryPrimate
    @HarryPrimate 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    The Northrop Tacit Blue approach to stealth was to make it so ugly that everyone just looked away.

  • @torq1116
    @torq1116 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    IL-40 looks super cool!

  • @davidmurphy8190
    @davidmurphy8190 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Love the Tacit Blue.

  • @Cuccos19
    @Cuccos19 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Gloster Meteor was not really ugly - at least not the early ones. The Britten-Norman Trilander is a fantastic aircraft, just like the Islander.

  • @Istandby666
    @Istandby666 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    We were on project Tacit Blue, aka Orca.
    Tacit Blue was only a demonstrator. There are many different systems being tested here. One is the radar cross section of curved surfaces.
    It did do it's job.

  • @Herowebcomics
    @Herowebcomics 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Wow!
    These planes are weird,but innovative!

  • @EVISEH
    @EVISEH 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    A lot of the aircraft featured were one off conversions of an existing design done to fulfill a specific purpose. Such aircraft will inevitably be aesthetically unpleasing, odd looking or ugly. But just because they do not meet your definition of being aesthetic does not mean the aircraft should be derided, as you do. If an aircraft efficiently does what it was designed or converted for, why does it need to be aesthetically pleasing? It does not!!

  • @retepeyahaled2961
    @retepeyahaled2961 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    There is more to Tacit Vlue than hurting the eye. It was a stealth demonstrator using (not flat, but) curved lines. If you look closely, you see technical similarities with the Northrop B2.

  • @gpaull2
    @gpaull2 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    IL-40 looks like something from Star Wars.

  • @Istandby666
    @Istandby666 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    We were on project Jabber Jaw (X-32). The plane gots it nickname due the the movable intake jaw.

  • @bradjohnson4787
    @bradjohnson4787 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I remember the Boeing/McDonnell ugly fighter and knew they were screwed!

  • @talkerbill1
    @talkerbill1 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Nimrod is a good looking plane.

  • @Calilasseia
    @Calilasseia 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Since some prop driven aircraft were featured, why was the Blohm & Voss BV141 omitted? A weird asymmetrical aircraft that, surprisingly, possessed very good flying characteristics, but looked as if its designers were abusing some weapons grade recreational pharmaceuticals ...

  • @brucermarino
    @brucermarino หลายเดือนก่อน

    The comments on aesthetics indicate a profound lack of knowledge. Although I do like some of your choices. Thanks!

  • @kundeleczek1
    @kundeleczek1 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Zubr bomber. Thanks me later.

  • @mysterycrumble
    @mysterycrumble 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    the aew2 radar system had no blind spots unlike the awacs

    • @mysterycrumble
      @mysterycrumble 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      the nimrod itself did have a decent amount of issues, tho

    • @donmunro5320
      @donmunro5320 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      In an unofficial trial vs the E-3 The Nimrod AEW detected only 30% of the targets detected but the e-3. Date entry was slow, periodically the operators had to be told “Hands up” stop entering data, the computer needed to catch up, shoddy engineering to produce another all British failure.

    • @flybobbie1449
      @flybobbie1449 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@donmunro5320 Seem to remember fuel was used to cool computers.

  • @perrythomas6971
    @perrythomas6971 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    This dude does not know how to pronounce livery😂😂😂

  • @melangellatc1718
    @melangellatc1718 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Wasted my time...