Another fantastic performance! Victor Julien did a wonderful job! When young, great artists compete for who is better, it just goes to show how ludicrous it is to make believe that you can choose between them.
A beautifully performed work by the soloist and the orchestra! A lot of sensitivity and delicacy, a real happiness !! Thank you for sharing this high artistic quality. Cordially .
I would ask them "Are you going to make us admire your beauty or listen to a good playing?"Sometimes they try to open with "beauty"what they can't open with good taste beautiful sound and technique.If I want beauty I d look for photos but I want to listen...and what I listen is terrible
Yeah he does, and in the recapitulation he does the same. It's a tricky note to nail after falling with thumb on the D so he gets the reference I suppose.
Amazing sound. It's so refined and sweet, and of course it does justice to the beautiful playing. Are you the winner? When I listen to the others playing I think about how beautiful they sound, but when I heard this I felt more warmth and color, something beyond what the "right way" of playing is.
espetacular! really great and superb performance, but why he supressed the difficult part at the end of third movement? He was a first prize in the Elizabeth Competition. Congratulations! The Rostropovich's performance, in 1977, today is still really much more intimate and profound. The technique advances, the great musicians appear, but Rostropovich remains unsurpassed.
There are hundreds times more people who play classical music at a professional level than people who listen to classical music Today's exposed classical musicians are competition athletes that must follow the rules of whoever deigns to give them money. It is still possible in this world to see artists who are truly passionate about music and want to give the audience something more than a refined product that will get the approbation of the authorities of classical music and those who give the money, unfortunately it is terribly unlikely.
If anyone plays like Rostropovich in today's competitions, they would not get past the first round. Technique and musicality are simply way too different. Heifetz is no exception. We talk so much about how we want uniqueness but teachers and judges already have some general idea of what a piece should sound like. Try imitating Rostropovich's rendition of Haydn and you will be seen as an ignorant overly Romantic player. If you're complaining people sound too similar, I agree but not for the reasons you think. People sound alike because they listen to the same recordings and follow advices from teachers (who themselves follow the traditional views). It's also greatly influenced by the fact that most people use similar setups (e.g Larsen strings). The internet has greatly increased conformity in musical thought. When Du Pre recorded Elgar, it was totally different from every other Elgar recordings. She doesn't even follow much of the markings in the score. And yet, she 'owns' that piece. Rostropovich had to cancel his Elgar recording because of Du Pre's.
The "difficult part at the end of the third movement" which he omits (from 25:09) consists of ad libitum passages that were not written by Haydn. In Haydn's manuscript and in the first published editions, the cello is tacet, except for the part that Julien-Laferrière plays in this video. Editors added in the extra runs later.
You're 100% right -----I don’t agree, that nowadays artists, performers are sounding similar, larsen strings are used, because they are the best strings, or one of the best, but back to being similer, listen for example to the Haydn cello concerto in D, Gautier Capuçon, Kian Soltani, Pablo Farandez, Mischa Maisky...these people are still playing, alive...so living now...You would hear, that the interpretation is different...as a cellist myself, I hear, and know, that everyone is playing different...
Fox Mulder The money is not the main goal on these competitions, the main thing is exposer, to dorectors of orchestras to know about you, offer you a concert, to agencies that will see you and represent you, and the rules there are time limits and pieces that you need to play, but how you play them is all on you, and then there are many pieces, that you can choose, but with the time limit, or same period of classical music, but that is because, it needs to be fair to all competitors. And like I said, it’s on you how you play them...and you need to be different, intresting, why would than people go to your concert, they are going to listen to you, so you need to have special interpretation...
It’s interesting how people hear different things in the same piece. Of all the Haydn works I know - most of them - I would say that this concerto is the most UNCHARACHTERISTIC; it has almost nothing in it that is recognisably Haydnesque.
Plenty of petrol, ignition off for a bit with Haydn. Sometimes as punctuation, or pretending he had boxed himself in, or to let you try and guess where it goes next...this one is best as you will probably be wrong 9 times out of 10. He does it in symphonies as well, the one bar rest - for everyone.
Maverik Croos You cannot seem to accept the fact that not everyone likes Casals, Feuerman, Nelsova or Rostropovich never mind this 1st place winner. "Music is subjective." If you cannot accept that, then it is undemocratic. You think jealousy is the answer to all of your questions. You cer6ainly do not respect other people's opinions which makes it worse.
Define boring? He was fairly expressive in his dynamics and articulations. You may have found it boring because you wanted more explosive extroverted style. Judges these days favor these introverted non-showy performances - look at most 1st prize winners.
Welches wunderbares gefuehlvolles Zusammenspiel... SEHR persönliche Note des Cellisten - dafür lebendig und variationsreich... Gratulation
Another fantastic performance! Victor Julien did a wonderful job! When young, great artists compete for who is better, it just goes to show how ludicrous it is to make believe that you can choose between them.
Gorgeous !!!
Beautiful sound .........
1st movement 0:10
2nd movement 15:27
3rd movement 20:27
The sheer unbelievable tone quality
What a sensitive and clear interpretation! He most definitely deserved the win.
Lol Dude I just saw your name and I was like "WAAHT ITS BEN" :D:D
And I agree :)
Ben Meitzen IS THAT THE BEN MEITZEN???
A beautifully performed work by the soloist and the orchestra!
A lot of sensitivity and delicacy, a real happiness !!
Thank you for sharing this high artistic quality.
Cordially .
Piękny dzwięk piękne frazowanie.gratulacje!!!
I didn't even know Thom Yorke was a conductor, what a time to be alive
😂🤣
Great style and clarity of tone. BRAVO BRO!!
BROVO
Graceful yet zesty! He should conduct too, to save us from being trapped in what we are taught is Classical style, executed without any happy feeling.
Wow... Wonderful. 🌹❤👍
아씨 오케악보 보고있었는데
이사람이 너무 잘해서
어딘지 까먹음
splendide
Beautiful technique and flare.
Hmm, cellists are so often the most handsome in the orchestra ...
viola player in orchestra is more... :)
I agree you
I would ask them "Are you going to make us admire your beauty or listen to a good playing?"Sometimes they try to open with "beauty"what they can't open with good taste beautiful sound and technique.If I want beauty I d look for photos but I want to listen...and what I listen is terrible
I enjoyed this very much.
I was interested in the platform. It had two sound holes. It occurred to me that it helped to enhance the sound.
23:18 them octaves though !!!
I hear happiness...
Wtf are you putting ads???
which cadenza he play??
At 2:28 does he tune an E? Sounds like that.
Yeah he does, and in the recapitulation he does the same. It's a tricky note to nail after falling with thumb on the D so he gets the reference I suppose.
Absolute beauty in it's highest form. Does anyone know what cello he has? It's the best I've heard.
It's a milanese anonymous cello early 18th (school of Alberti)
Amazing sound. It's so refined and sweet, and of course it does justice to the beautiful playing. Are you the winner? When I listen to the others playing I think about how beautiful they sound, but when I heard this I felt more warmth and color, something beyond what the "right way" of playing is.
@@roriccunningham348 sounds like butter am I right ;-)
@@QuentonBlache totally... lol
Quenton Blache Euhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
Jaime altozano nos sorprende tocando cello xd un grande
Nisiquiera se parece xdd
espetacular! really great and superb performance, but why he supressed the difficult part at the end of third movement? He was a first prize in the Elizabeth Competition. Congratulations!
The Rostropovich's performance, in 1977, today is still really much more intimate and profound. The technique advances, the great musicians appear, but Rostropovich remains unsurpassed.
There are hundreds times more people who play classical music at a professional level than people who listen to classical music
Today's exposed classical musicians are competition athletes that must follow the rules of whoever deigns to give them money. It is still possible in this world to see artists who are truly passionate about music and want to give the audience something more than a refined product that will get the approbation of the authorities of classical music and those who give the money, unfortunately it is terribly unlikely.
If anyone plays like Rostropovich in today's competitions, they would not get past the first round. Technique and musicality are simply way too different. Heifetz is no exception. We talk so much about how we want uniqueness but teachers and judges already have some general idea of what a piece should sound like. Try imitating Rostropovich's rendition of Haydn and you will be seen as an ignorant overly Romantic player.
If you're complaining people sound too similar, I agree but not for the reasons you think. People sound alike because they listen to the same recordings and follow advices from teachers (who themselves follow the traditional views). It's also greatly influenced by the fact that most people use similar setups (e.g Larsen strings). The internet has greatly increased conformity in musical thought.
When Du Pre recorded Elgar, it was totally different from every other Elgar recordings. She doesn't even follow much of the markings in the score. And yet, she 'owns' that piece. Rostropovich had to cancel his Elgar recording because of Du Pre's.
The "difficult part at the end of the third movement" which he omits (from 25:09) consists of ad libitum passages that were not written by Haydn. In Haydn's manuscript and in the first published editions, the cello is tacet, except for the part that Julien-Laferrière plays in this video. Editors added in the extra runs later.
You're 100% right -----I don’t agree, that nowadays artists, performers are sounding similar, larsen strings are used, because they are the best strings, or one of the best, but back to being similer, listen for example to the Haydn cello concerto in D, Gautier Capuçon, Kian Soltani, Pablo Farandez, Mischa Maisky...these people are still playing, alive...so living now...You would hear, that the interpretation is different...as a cellist myself, I hear, and know, that everyone is playing different...
Fox Mulder The money is not the main goal on these competitions, the main thing is exposer, to dorectors of orchestras to know about you, offer you a concert, to agencies that will see you and represent you, and the rules there are time limits and pieces that you need to play, but how you play them is all on you, and then there are many pieces, that you can choose, but with the time limit, or same period of classical music, but that is because, it needs to be fair to all competitors. And like I said, it’s on you how you play them...and you need to be different, intresting, why would than people go to your concert, they are going to listen to you, so you need to have special interpretation...
May I kindly ask whats The tempo you usad? Is IT 50 to a quarter note? Thanks
what section?
Mov.1 Cadence 12:55
which round is this?
N
very very Haydnish. :)
It’s interesting how people hear different things in the same piece.
Of all the Haydn works I know - most of them - I would say that this concerto is the most UNCHARACHTERISTIC; it has almost nothing in it that is recognisably Haydnesque.
sleeping beauty... i understand secure playing, well, it's competion but if the music stops sometimes like a car with empty tank...it's not good...
Plenty of petrol, ignition off for a bit with Haydn. Sometimes as punctuation, or pretending he had boxed himself in, or to let you try and guess where it goes next...this one is best as you will probably be wrong 9 times out of 10. He does it in symphonies as well, the one bar rest - for everyone.
Maciej Kulakowsky was the best. It's m'y opinion... Musically, technically too...
Very good performance, but for me this period of music is pretty boring.
Sorty. It is musically boring.
It is unconscionable to have a monotonous player receive 1st prize.
you seem to be jealous, your life is more boring anyway
Maverik Croos
You cannot seem to accept the fact that not everyone likes Casals,
Feuerman, Nelsova or Rostropovich never mind this 1st place winner. "Music is subjective."
If you cannot accept that, then it is undemocratic. You think jealousy is the answer to all of your questions. You cer6ainly do not respect other people's opinions which makes it worse.
Define boring? He was fairly expressive in his dynamics and articulations. You may have found it boring because you wanted more explosive extroverted style. Judges these days favor these introverted non-showy performances - look at most 1st prize winners.
What the jury, unfortunately, values more nowadays is how good/perfect is the musicians technique, not his musicality :/
@@asmith8815 Even Rostropovich couldn't really perform music.