I still love your no bullshit videos. I rewatch them from time to time to remember what photography should be not a damn camera bashing arena. I don’t make money with my photography just consider myself to be a forever photography student because we should always be learning. Jus my opinion don’t cancel me!
Just got my 7100, for $200 (£150), w/ 36k shutters. It was time to upgrade from my Canon eos t3. From a Vespa to a Ducati. I’ve been ingesting every 7100 video I can find. This was the shortest, yet most non-technical informative and reassuring video yet. Thanks for the boost!
Long time happy owner (from new) D7000, the reviews of D7100 have convinced me to make the jump. Maybe a D800 would be a great full feature second acquisition, but the D7200/D7500 don't interest me. Legacy lens support is huge to me.
2024 checking in.. my D7100 outshoots my Sony A7R ii so good I'm trading the Sony for a D810 because the colors from DSLR's are so freakin awesome not to mention the dynamic range of a DSLR. Yes people i traded my mirrorless for a mirror because it's not about noise and all the extra mirrorless fluff for me.
Really great review. I own a d7100, bought it new a year after it came out. I typed it in the search of TH-cam to hear a great reason to keep using it and to not fall into the gear head mindset and spending a lot of money on the latest toy, that seem to only last for 6 months to year before a new version comes. Your video was the first and I glad and satisfied with the d7100. I just recently purchased a use Nikon F5 film camera, one the best Nikon ever made. Thank you very much and by the way your work is beautiful.
You sir are one Bad-Ass photographer holding my daily pride, feels cool the praise given by somebody obviously so weathered and experienced in photographing dynamic subjects.
I would have to say that you are one of a very few chaps that actually talk straight about cameras. It`s so much better not listening to the `so-called` youtube experts who think they know everything but really know nothing. Thanks again from Peterborough.
I started on a D3100 and upgraded to this camera many years ago. Love it. I still use it more than my other cameras. Just fun to use and super reliable
One of the best, no BS, camera reviews I've seen so far. Can you recommend some of your favorite lenses for d7100(wide angle, portrait, tele...zoom...) or even better make a video about it ?
Ivan Trnavac - thank you for your comment. My personal favorite lenses are Nikon Micro nikkors currently available quite cheaply. All f2.8 lenses - the 105mm and the 40mm or 60mm. I don't shoot any wider than 30mm for my needs - and for that I use Sigma 30mm f1.4 HSM. Also any Sigma Art lens is worth having, in any focal length. For portraits though, definitely Micro Nikkor 105mm 2.8 is my choice for the last few years - a great lens at a reasonable price I think. For zoom - Nikon 70-200 2.8 VR ii. Not cheap unfortunately...
The only reason for me to consider replacing my seven year's old D7100 is the weight. It weighs 2.6 lb with the kit lens 18-140 mm. Yet I find those new mirrorless cameras like Lumix S 5 or Nikon Z5 with the kit lens are not so light as expected. After watching your video, I will keep my D7100 for another seven years or more. Thanks for your comment.
Yes I tried one or two mirrorless in the early days - Sony A7R was my first try - I needed a battery grip due to the bad battery life, so add that and an L lens and adapter and it was as heavy as anything else... but I have a Lumix G85 though and that thing weighs nothing with a native lens.
Very refreshing in this world of consumerism gone mad and yes I still use my D7100.One camera I think you would love is the D700 as the colour rendering from this beast has never been bettered in my humble opinion.Unspoilt by progress!
I hear good things about the D700 for sure, haven't used one yet though. I have a D800E which I really like a lot though - especially for tripod work. Thank you for taking the time to comment, I really appreciate that.
@@scottwesterman221 I shot some weddings with D7000 and SB800 speedlight, not know why you couldn't do same with the improved D7100. And two SD slots. :)
I remember watching your review , just as I bought the D7200 with Sigma 17-50 F2.8 HSM lens. After hearing your no nonsense review , it was obvious I had made the right choice. Quality glass is really the differentiator, not the bodies
Iver Heath - yep you've got a great camera and really nice lens there - enjoy creating images, and thank you for taking the time to leave a comment. I really appreciate that.
Wow! nice ! Very direct, straight to the point and knows exactly what he is talking about. Something I have learned from this video is Great lenses you want to invest your money and I don’t need an expensive camera.
Very wise video. We share the same camera philosophy. Here I am in 2022, a working motion photographer who uses a D7100 when my check depends on getting the still images and there is no second chances. My run and gun one man style makes me carry only what i need. I work outside often in heat way over 30c, chalky dust, heavy rain. The camera keeps going after the full frame Canon R5 gives up. I often been tempted to let the Nikon go but I can't as it proves to be my insurance when the shots count. It is also the one I carry when i travel and have to stuff one in a backpack with 2 lenses or in my saddlebags for my long road trips. Activating the crop function gives me almost double focal lengths which extend my reach when i can not get closer.Yeah like you, I need to buy a low shutter count one to replace the high mile beast that keeps me fed. Needless to say I am a new subscriber to your channel. Look forward to your posts.
From this eighty four year old, thanks for getting rid of the bullshit. From my first brownie, through Ilford Sportsman via Miranda and Pentax Sf1 to Nikon D3200, sales pitches are sometimes outrageous in the claims. I finally purchased a D7100 with very low shutter count for a very reasonable price. It is a fantastic camera. It does virtually everything well. Battery life is good as is the handling. There is no real advantage in buying the latest camera in this range. Sure, the D7500 will have some features extra. But, is it worth spending a pile of money when this will do just as well for considerably less money? And, yes, spend the savings on glass.
For me, the Nikon D7100 is a tank. I work with this model for five years now and I am very relaxed working with the D7100. Thank you for the video. Best wishes from Canary Islands un Spain.
Nothing wrong with the D7100 in my opinion. High-res files, great autofocus, good dynamic range, compatible with old Nikkor lenses - which is a big plus for me - and light to carry arround. You're dead on regarding sharpness, the resolution is so high that it demands absolute solid technique and/or a tripod to really get that extra detail. I use it mainly for macro photography and I'm more than happy with the results.
two years ago my father bought this camera for me and I've been using it for landscape and portrait. love it. And I agree, invest in lens rather than body. every year or two there'll be new camera body with little upgrade but a great lens always a great lens
The D7100 is one of the finest DSLR cameras made thus far. Adequate functions and facilities and perfect sensor of APS-C at 20Mp. I love mine and as I'm 'getting on a bit' I'll never go to mirrorless.
Great video, brilliant to see such stunning photos with a D7100. I have one which I had bought to replace a D200 as a birding camera. However I have found the D7100 frustrating for birds in flight with really inconsistent results. So much so, I had replaced it with a D300s and had been planning to list it on Ebay. However, since watching this I plan to give it another chance. Looking forward to more videos and happy to join on Patreon. All the best, Mick
Hi Mick, firstly may I thank you for your kind support of my humble channel - I very much appreciate that. I must admit that I have not often shot bird-in-flight, so I wouldn't be able to comment with any authority on the D7100's capabilities myself - I certainly accept your words on the subject. I will say that I found the focus system on D7100 quite exacting to set up for what I used it for - and I went down a few blind alleys until I found what worked for me. I think I view the D7100 as a jack of all trades camera really 😊
@@loneshootr Hi, glad to be on board. Looking forward to learning some useful skills, I am going try that fuscia shot! I have found the D7100 produces some great images but I am wondering if my mistake in photographing birds in flight was shooting in burst mode and it just struggled to keep up. If I am using RAW files in burst mode its results on birds in flight aren't as as good, JPEG seems better but I prefer the flexibility of RAW for post production work in Lightroom. But moving forward I will try in single-shot mode and see how it goes. I hate to give up on it, because it's a great piece of kit.
I have a D7100 for many years now, i do macro with it, + D3 for a sports and wildlife, best money, tanks of a Nikon, long battery. For what i shoot realy i dont see the slightest reason to buy camera of more price, yeah they do have better qualities and stuff, but i am not limited by my cameras so far. Love videos of older cameras, so nice to see people who review the stuff they love, not the iones they paid for. Interesting if you still with d7100 in 2022?
Unfortunately I had to sell most of my gear in 2020 when the pandemic killed my business. All the Nikon stuff went (apart from the film cameras)... Having said that - yes, I'd be totally happy to shoot a D7100 in 2022 😊
The Nikon D7100 camera is still a very capable camera to this day, very well built, and easily the quality of some of Nikon's pro cameras. The D7100 merely lacks a bit of sophistication, such as more sophisticated auto-focus capabilities, and a super fast buffer. It's the best DX camera ever made by Nikon.
I'm just a hobby photographer had D5000 that thing turd I threw it off a bridge and went out got D7100 1,200 brand new at that time they were coming out with the D7200. Happy with the D7100 been going for 6 years still going strong even the two accidents ahead with it .
Thanks for sharing your thoughts and comments....yes I have a D7100 & love using it...I did upgrade to a D500 & still kept my D7100.... actually I should have just spent the money on better glass although my D500 is a great camera.... cheers from Australia 🦘🦘😊
I bought 1 of these last year and I love it. It’s my favourite DSLR, and the one that I go to for digital shots. I grab my F5 for film shots and the 2 of them together are awesome.
I use the 7100's younger brother D7200 and love it....somewhat larger buffer but nearly identical...for sports/action/BIF I am looking at the D500 and for FX the D810/850.
charles rankin - Thank you for taking the time to comment Charles - and I agree photography can help so much with calming the spirit, it certainly helps me when things start closing in. Wishing you the best.
Hi, this was a good honest review. I bought a D7100 new around 5 years ago, 2 years later I bought another but secondhand with under 5k clicks on it for £300. Still very pleased with the results I'm getting with these two bodies. Any chance of doing a review on the Nikon D200 (my previous camera) say in your line of photography please. This is a great idea for a feature, showing there's life in some of the older cameras out there.
Patrick Hennessy - Thank you for taking the time to comment, it is appreciated. Yes there are many older cameras I would like to review for sure - but unfortunately due to the economic effects of the pandemic I cannot afford to buy any cameras for the foreseeable future I'm afraid. In fact I've had to sell most of my cameras and lenses to pay the rent... As soon as I am able I will certainly make review videos of many older cameras - the list is growing!
You’ve inspired me, man... My trusty D7100 is about 7 years old and I figured I’d have to replace it soon given the mass move to DX and mirrorless cameras. Well, I will be buying another body, another D7100 as backup. Thanks brother.
Really inspired by this beautiful video. One question please help me out, really confused, my preference is photography. Is it worth buying nikon d7100 over nikon d5600 or canon 200d ii. All three costs almost same in 2021 currently in my country. ??????
Hi Chiranjit - There is no straightforward answer to that comparison really. But I'll try! If you want a strong robust weather sealed body to shoot in all weathers - landscape work for instance - a camera that will serve you not only as a beginner, but will continue to be satisfactory as you become proficient... D7100. If you want a smaller lighter camera, no weather sealing, simpler to use but still immensely capable and with good video capabilities also - Canon 200Dii (250D) SL3.
Thank you for a truly honest, crap-free, review. Very refreshing. I bought mine soon after it came out. It's more of a camera than I need and has so many features that I will never use but Iove trying to improve my photography. I would love to know what lenses you use, (and why) even though I'll probably never spend a fortune on top spec lenses.
I mean seriously 😳…. I got mine brand new in 2013 since then shot not much dew to several reasons. But from last few months thinking to upgrade but only factor stoping me to doing so it is the price and devalue too much. Cut the long story short I really appreciate your effort to made review for Nikon D7100 n from now going to have it with me for another years and will get another separate mirror less body 😊. N again I absolutely agreed with the fact invest in glass and i’m still using my 15/16 years old glass and work great so far with some new glass. Sound like u’r an old school other wise everyone running for megapixels 🙈🔥😖… as I produce some of best images back in time with Nikon D1x. Any ways great effort and we respect that u made for people like us. 🙏😇
Have one since release, magnificent camera. Only thing that’s itching me to upgrade is the size. The newer Z series is just a bit smaller and with my small hands fits a bit better.
Alright I'm taking your advice. I just ordered a d7100 to start my photography career. Now what do you recommend for the best editing system on a budget? Thanks again and you're now my photography sensei.
Roy Ragnar - Way to go, good choice, and wise. Now then... editing software... I still use Adobe Photography Package even though I'm not a working 'pro' these days - though I'll probably cancel it when my annual subscription ends. It costs £9.99 a month by the way, includes Lightroom & Photoshop etc., and I'm so used to it that I will miss it. It is a terrific setup in my opinion. However, I have a free recommendation: Download RawTherapee for your raw processing - it looks quite daunting when you first start but there are great tutorials on you tube - it is a very powerful raw processing tool though. Then for further image manipulation (using layers etc like Photoshop) download GiMP. It works in tandem with RawTherapee and together they are very powerful. I used to use these two for pro work before I went the Adobe route. Both are free downloads. Hope this helps you Roy.
Which inkjet do you recommend for your horse pictures? I know. How long is a piece of string kinda question, but it would be interesting to know what you choose.
william Oneill - I'm not really qualified to answer with any authority on the subject I'm afraid - sorry William. I outsource all my printing to a trusted print lab I've used exclusively for my pro work. When I was considering a printer I did look at the Canon PROGRAF PRO-300 but decided against it - I only produced prints for clients who paid in advance so it seemed pointless to spend the money on something that could go wrong lol...
I am about to patent a piece of kit which will be universally accepted as a standard string length so the " How long is a piece of string " ? will be obsolete also i am in consultation with Ronseal to use recyclable organic containers to be able do away with " It does what it says on the tin " which has been grossly over used.I reckon that's the best idea since sliced bread !
@@twiglet2214 not to mention that sliced bread was a fairly half assed idea in the first place, hardly a yardstick of advanced technical innovation to my mind. Ready buttered bread - now we're nudging into Nobel territory. It would also appear that I'm the only one who actually knows how long a piece of string is. And how many beans make five. Oh yes.
@@loneshootr Ironically the inventor of dynamite had a peace prize named after him - at the end of the day.Technically speaking he was an animal impression trainer and his speciality was teaching punters to do Lion impressions - he did a roaring trade ! No existential paradigm for our Alf vis-a-vis string length - he just blew it to pieces ! Piece of cake but explosive ordnance not my cup of tea so i'll shutter up now...now the only thing that's getting me down is gravity.
I've had my d7100 for six years and it will stay in my bag. I'm getting into drone photo and video for school, I traded my d4s for a drone setup and kept the d7100 for everything else I shoot.
Good Nikon model D7100. Today 2022 yr real cheap 250 €. Other countries 260 dollar. Shuter longest 2.000.000 photography. Good video HD sound audio dark wide low Light
Bought mine last year when KEH did a 15% off Nikon bodies sale. Got it like-new for around $300, was an "upgrade" from a D3400. Absolutely love this camera. Use it mostly for wildlife and it works pretty well. I have been eyeing a D500 but with so many buying up cameras now that they are stuck at home and need a new hobby, hard to find one for a decent price.
That's a great price, and yes I agree - D500 would probably be a good fit for your purposes. As for prices - I initially thought that this lockdown might mean cameras at lower prices on the used market, but as you say, that's not how it's looking...
The D7100 is a very capable camera and as you pointed out so affordable you get a lot of camera for very little money great video and wonderful photography
Alfred - Everyone will have a different view on this - but I can only speak for lenses I actually use, and for wide angle interior work - real estate for example - I use a Sigma 14mm f2.8 EX HSM. It is rectilinear and so it shows minimal distortion to straight lines. I have heard good things about the Samyang 14mm f2.8 manual focus lens, but I have not tried one - so I can't say for sure. Hope this helps, and thank you for watching.
Awesome review! Is the camera suitable for 24x36" prints with amazing detail from close viewing distance? Does it produce stunning colors SOOC or during image editing? Can it rival Nikon D800 if shooting at ISO100 only with sharp lens and stitching images for panoramas? I would like to print landscapes on metallic papers behind acrylic glass where colors and details matter a lot.
Well, I've had many high quality 3ft x 2ft prints from a 7100 - but only if the lens quality is high. For extreme detail and 6ft x 4ft prints I used to use a D800E but again, the lens matters far more than the body really. In my experience of making large prints, most cameras are more than capable if paired with good glass and the image is well shot. I've always made large prints for my type of work and my 12mp 5D worked just fine 😎
@@loneshootr Thank you for the detailed answer and different point of view. What you say sounds encouriging. Most photographers don`t print large and they always say "you don`t need much dpi because of the viewing distance" but in my case I need fine detail from very close distance becauste the product asks for premium price. Would you recommend a simple lens like Nikon 35mm f/1.8G AF-S as perfect for resolving fine detail for 24x36" prints? I ahve heard stories about gorgeous prints at the same size from 5D classic and knew it had to do with the weak AA filter but still most photograpers do not care at super fine detail because of the viewing distance. Is it possible to achieve my goals with a 5D and a Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II as well?
@@Classicdslr I can really only speak of my own experience in this and I can't actually remember what I thought of the 35 1.8G AF-S... The best results I had were using a D800E with any of the later MicroNikkor range of lenses - in particular the 105 2.8. As you know, the D800E - although it does still have an AA filter - the AA filter is 'neutralised'. Having said that, the difference is just about imperceptible in 99% of shots! D7100 has no AA but I never saw the difference... When I've been aiming for fine detail in a shot to printed large, obviously I've avoided the wider apertures so I never felt the need to pay for superfast lenses in this respect. As for the 5D and 50mm - viewing distance rules will apply. If I'm reading you right, you need a setup to enable perceptible fine detail at way less than normal viewing distances. To obtain that 'clinical' sharpness is about the only time I would ever suggest a high megapixel count to be honest. I think if I was in your shoes I'd be looking for a good used 5DSR together with any of the lenses which can resolve what that sensor is capable of - 100mm f2, 50mm f1.8 being the cheapest pair - plus L lens range. (I did own a 5DSR and it is still a phenomenal camera regardless of its age). Second choice would be D800E and Micro Nikkor lenses. I hope this is of some use. Drew
@@loneshootr Thank you so much for sharing so much of your experience here. I was hoping Nikon D7100 would be suffieciant but I see I need to aim for better. Have read Nikon D800 has multiple issues so D800E should be the minimum from Nikon`s side. Have also read 5Dsr has limited dynamic range and not so good colors when shadows are lifted. I know most people who write those things do not even print but hearing the oposite opinion from someone who actually prints and deffinitely knows how to shoot and edit images I bet you are right. Thank you.
Hi mate... where did you get hold of that periscope from? I did some pet photography a couple of days ago and could have done with it for getting super low
Found it on ebay - prices vary wildly though. This one's a Nikon DR-6, but fits some apsc Canons. Not sure but I think I paid around 75 for it. Superb for dog photography.
Great video, straight to the point! I'm thinking to upgrade my d3400 in terms to upgrade focusing ability with d7100/7200 or full frame d610/d750 for general use, landsapes, streetphotography, kids, portraits.. What is your opinion about the choice? Thanks!
Just my personal opinion - if I were you I'd go for a D800 really. They are a reasonable price used now and are superb cameras. I can't honestly comment on D610 or D750 as I've no experience with them. The 610 is fairly cheap now, but having used a D800 (E) for 3 years I can recommend it.
Have you done any videos on your equine photography with the 7100, with detais of lenses and settings? That's my main interest here in UK. Brian Rankin
Brian, I'm working on that very subject right now as it happens. I have shoots this week which I will be videoing in order to break down the process and exactly what I am looking to capture for the client.
My D7500 is now up to 388,000 clicks now,, still running like the day it came out of the box. I used to worry about the shutter count, but now I don't think about it. I just pick up the camera and switch it on. In my seventies, fighting cancer, the D7500 will probably outlast me.
I was looking for a camera to replace a d90 I bought new back in 09 to be able to do larger prints or crop compositions without losing too much detail. Picked up one of these 7100s and what a nice camera. The one thing and it’s with all of them maybe I am defective but I still like a split screen focuser. I always loved that about the old manual cameras. I had a nice ground glass one I paid a premium for back in 09 for the d90. I was fortunate it fit the d7100 because the company that made it went out of business years ago.
Which lenses would you recommend to make the most out of Nikon d7100. I am looking at sigma 18-35 1.8 hsm dc for portraits and landscapes. Thank you in advance!
Dionisios Melogiannidis That Sigma is a fine lens. Lenses I recommend are any of the Micro Nikkor 2.8 lenses - 40mm and 105mm in particular. The 105mm is superb for portraits. Thank you for watching, and for taking the time to comment - I really appreciate it.
When I take photos at events (Skis) I have an A6500 with a 70-300m lens which works perfectly. My problem that I now discovered is when these skiers get closer, I need to be able to quickly have a different lens. So an secondary camera would help alot. Of which I am now looking at this particular camera, as it seems to hold the measure of my goal and the price is reasonable(Mabye not as fast compared to my A6500) but still.
What about the longevity of the on-board lithium battery for saving camera configuration settings? I thought lithium batteries were usually rated at lasting around 5 to 7 years.
Interesting question Shaun. I have absolutely no knowledge on the subject unfortunately, forgive me. All I can say is that being a regular user of 'out of date' cameras - I haven't personally experienced such a failure with any of them, yet. Maybe someone else might chime in here with the relevant knowledge.
Hi Jenni - three lenses mainly, old Nikkor 50mm f1.4D, MicroNikkor AFS 105mm f 2.8, and MicroNikkor AFS 40mm f 2.8. Sometimes an old manual Helios 44-2 58mm f 2.
Brad G - yeah I'm doing ok, thank you for your kindness brother. I've shot the same video maybe four times (a video about my Canon 5D) and I'm just not producing what I want. So I'm trying different styles. I just want my videos to be better than they have been...
i have a problem with my D7100 it will indicate that it is in focus then when i review the photos the subject is slightly out of focus and the background is in focus. i really would want to fix this issue and i haev tried everything.
My personal view? For vlog/broll etc - go Canon or Sony. You need that good autofocus. M50, SL2, 80D, - all cheap and great AF. I don't know much about Sony, but the AF on newer cameras seems great. AF on this Nikon is poor in live view. Great stills cam though.
Bayou Josh - Yep for sure. I used to have 2 D7100's as my main equine photography workers, but a strap mount pulled clean out of the body on one in mid-shoot. (Juggling 2 cameras while shooting fast action - I can't afford such a failure!). This was the only reason I stopped using them really - other than that they were perfect.
Are you kidding me. If you are not making money with the device, this is gold. Had the privilege to shoot with Z7II with kit lens, and it made no difference. For people who shoot people or action for money sure, but me with D7100 and Tamron 17-50 I'm more than OK. I just wish people start selling old glass quickly.
@@loneshootr Sure you can make money with it. But new cameras have so much more to offer, especially mirrorless with smart AF. You can even be a creep and shoot street photos of people from the waist with aperture wide open, and hit rate is great. This also means any journalist photographer of sport photographer just has to press the shutter button and the camera does all the rest. With D7100 you have to work little bit more. But for anybody, especially professionals, if they know how to use a DLSR, they can easily get the job done with D7100.
lone shooter lol your ‘humble video’ was extremely informative and confirmed my subscription, looking forward to more of these ‘the real talks’ (that’s what it felt like to me) - thanks for taking the time to share your wisdom
Hi, love your videos. I am new to photography and just bought a D7100. It comes with a 18-140mm lens. I bought it because it was on sale ($549, without tax, bought it at military exchange). I want to be a freelance photojournalist, but some people are saying that a D3500 or D5600 is better. Or, maybe I should get a better lens? Would like to know what you think.
AmbientRanger - the 18-140 AF-S is a great and capable all rounder, you'll find it very useful if you go towards photojournalism. You'll probably have to deal with less than ideal lighting situations from time to time - so a Sigma 30mm f1.4 DC HSM for low light work would come in useful... If budget is very limited, a basic AF Nikkor 50mm f1.8 lens would help you a lot. (The D7100 has the focus drive to operate the older AF lenses as well as AF-S lenses). As for the body - D7100? You bought exactly the right one 😎
Great video. Very informative. Out of curiosity I looked on Amazon for the Nikon Right Angle Viewfinder and was surprised to see the DR 6 for £256! Cost as much as your camera body (if that is the same model). Although I’m sure you would’ve found it cheaper somewhere.
@@loneshootr for a start maybe the p1000 . Love the zoom but cropped not a good thing . Better then nothing i guess . The 6d mark 2 is expensive yet and the D850 😢
I would like to get a little more use out of my D7100 by using it to live stream. Any ideas how to get clean HDMI out? I am certain my viewers don't want my camera stats smiling in their face!
NadiaMavenOfMotivation - I believe that if you repeatedly press the 'info' button to scroll through the display options you'll eventually see a clean output display - certainly for external monitors/recorders. I've never used the D7100 for this but I'm led to believe it is possible... let me know how you get on !
Really like your video. Thank you for sharing your advice on the matter. I own the d7100 and thinking upgrading to a full frame for better quality and shots at darker environment. With d7100 I have serious trouble in low light situations. I've tried f1.8 lenses, but still not satisfied. Also autofocus problems even with high shutter speed and adjustments in camera settings. Maybe I still do something wrong...
Hm... not sure about the autofocus trouble - I've always found it to be satisfactory. Depending on the lens, shooting wide open apertures - 1.2, 1.4, 1.8 etc., challenges any af system sometimes. Experiment with AF settings in camera - it really pays off with a D7100. The wrong settings for your needs in any given situation can cause all sorts of issues. What is your specific low light problem? High ISO noise in images?
@@loneshootr thank you for your reply. Yes too much noise and poor compensation at post editing. No way to shoot anything descent when the sun is down, only with tripod. But let's say I want some quick urban shots or something caught my eye.. I try with f1.8d 50mm to take portraits and it's very hard to produce a sharp image even with good light, high shutter speed and trying to be super steady. I can't figure out how people shoot super sharp portraits at f1.8 and what I am doing wrong.
@@dionisiosmelogiannidis5350 That's interesting you say you can't get get sharp images even in good light... it's possible you have a bad 50mm 1.8D lens - I have two, and the first one I got was so soft at 1.8 it was unusable. I had a 1.4D that was the same. It's always worth seeing if it can be improved by calibrating the camera to the lens - 'fine tune'. There are many you tube videos on the subject. It's worth trying first. As for the digital noise - it is an old sensor now so won't be up to modern standards of course, but I have shot up to 1600 ISO and the images cleaned up well enough - but if you're going much above that, then yes, maybe time to upgrade to a more modern camera body. I have to say though, I have shot many times in poor light and exposure and shadow recovery in Lightroom has always been satisfactory for me with the D7100.
@@loneshootr I never set iso higher than 800, 1000 if very necessary. It's always about the light. With good light comes a clean image obviously even with higher ISO. But I find it very inconvenient not being able to use at lower light. For example I could never take a shot from a performance at the theatre. I was trying to use the existing light , but in order to get a usable shot I should raise shutter speed and then it goes domino.. too high ISO and wide-open f.. not possible... There I thought ff, bigger sensor more light.. higher ISO and usable
Are you using "Matrix" metering? Also, I may be misunderstanding you, but it sounds like you're saying you increase the shutter speed for low light when it should be the opposite. Again I may be misunderstanding.
I have a D7000 and an old D300 but, like you said, with some good glass you can take some good pictures! But for birding and cropping the extra pixels of my D800 come in handy. And you're right, all that pixel peeping and now the mirrorless hype is a bit over the top for me. Gives us the opportunity to buy some good cameras second hand. I haven't explored even half of the possibilities the cameras are capable off anyway!
Intruder Grid - ah you have a D800... one of my favorite cameras ever (I had the D800E) - I really miss it. Great sensor, reminded me a lot of my old A7R sensor. May be same sensor from some of the info I've seen online.
I have had my D7000 since new and love it. I will add a D7100! Maybe a D800 too. I have several fast older lenses and legacy lens support is huge for me.
I've used the Nikon D40 for far to long as a hobby, now my shoots are a little more serious I'm looking at the D7100 but like most Brits I don't like spending money haha.. I cannot find a 7100 on ebay for less than 350 with high shutter counts. Great review, is their anything you can say on the Video recording? Thanks in advance
Mckenzie Davenport - I'm surprised you can't find a D7100 cheaper - you'll spot one at the right price soon enough I'd guess. In all honesty, I can't give a helpful opinion on video on the D7100 as I only tried video once. The footage was ok, but not the greatest. Auto focus in video is an issue too... I have seen competent video by others using the D7100, but I really see it as a stills camera to be honest - there are so many better options for video on a budget now.
My NEW Personal channel - just started here:
th-cam.com/channels/L8uBp-VChKfq0r37iaDq8A.html
Oh, so that's what it feels like when someone's not trying to sell me something. Almost forgot.
Florian Schumacher - ha yeah, I know what you mean.. Thank you so much for taking the time to watch and comment - I appreciate that.
I still love your no bullshit videos. I rewatch them from time to time to remember what photography should be not a damn camera bashing arena. I don’t make money with my photography just consider myself to be a forever photography student because we should always be learning. Jus my opinion don’t cancel me!
Just got my 7100, for $200 (£150), w/ 36k shutters. It was time to upgrade from my Canon eos t3. From a Vespa to a Ducati. I’ve been ingesting every 7100 video I can find. This was the shortest, yet most non-technical informative and reassuring video yet. Thanks for the boost!
Long time happy owner (from new) D7000, the reviews of D7100 have convinced me to make the jump. Maybe a D800 would be a great full feature second acquisition, but the D7200/D7500 don't interest me. Legacy lens support is huge to me.
Picking up the 7100 tomorrow. Thanks for putting me on the path on this one.
Diablo Grande - Great stuff! Let me know what you think of it.
2024 checking in.. my D7100 outshoots my Sony A7R ii so good I'm trading the Sony for a D810 because the colors from DSLR's are so freakin awesome not to mention the dynamic range of a DSLR. Yes people i traded my mirrorless for a mirror because it's not about noise and all the extra mirrorless fluff for me.
Really great review. I own a d7100, bought it new a year after it came out. I typed it in the search of TH-cam to hear a great reason to keep using it and to not fall into the gear head mindset and spending a lot of money on the latest toy, that seem to only last for 6 months to year before a new version comes. Your video was the first and I glad and satisfied with the d7100. I just recently purchased a use Nikon F5 film camera, one the best Nikon ever made. Thank you very much and by the way your work is beautiful.
Sam mac - Thanks for your great comment! Yep, the F5 is an excellent camera also. A D7100 and an F5 is a great combo.
You sir are one Bad-Ass photographer holding my daily pride, feels cool the praise given by somebody obviously so weathered and experienced in photographing dynamic subjects.
This is what i call a review!!!!!
No BS. Just solid advice. subscribing.
Thanks alot.
You're very kind! Welcome to my humble l'il channel!
You deserve more subscribers. Excellent work and video.
Justin Waloshin - Thank you for your kindness Justin.
@@loneshootr you are welcome.
I agree 10000%
I would have to say that you are one of a very few chaps that actually talk straight about cameras. It`s so much better not listening to the `so-called` youtube experts who think they know everything but really know nothing. Thanks again from Peterborough.
Bigg Stavros - thank you kindly my friend.
I started on a D3100 and upgraded to this camera many years ago. Love it. I still use it more than my other cameras. Just fun to use and super reliable
Totally agree!
I use a d7100 and d3500 started with a d5100 and have had all the d3x00 range
One of the best, no BS, camera reviews I've seen so far. Can you recommend some of your favorite lenses for d7100(wide angle, portrait, tele...zoom...) or even better make a video about it ?
Ivan Trnavac - thank you for your comment.
My personal favorite lenses are Nikon Micro nikkors currently available quite cheaply. All f2.8 lenses - the 105mm and the 40mm or 60mm.
I don't shoot any wider than 30mm for my needs - and for that I use Sigma 30mm f1.4 HSM.
Also any Sigma Art lens is worth having, in any focal length.
For portraits though, definitely Micro Nikkor 105mm 2.8 is my choice for the last few years - a great lens at a reasonable price I think.
For zoom - Nikon 70-200 2.8 VR ii. Not cheap unfortunately...
The only reason for me to consider replacing my seven year's old D7100 is the weight. It weighs 2.6 lb with the kit lens 18-140 mm. Yet I find those new mirrorless cameras like Lumix S 5 or Nikon Z5 with the kit lens are not so light as expected. After watching your video, I will keep my D7100 for another seven years or more. Thanks for your comment.
Yes I tried one or two mirrorless in the early days - Sony A7R was my first try - I needed a battery grip due to the bad battery life, so add that and an L lens and adapter and it was as heavy as anything else... but I have a Lumix G85 though and that thing weighs nothing with a native lens.
Great video, i just got this body and several lenses in a trade. Glad to hear this from someone that has used it everyday 👍🏻
Nice 👍 and thank you for your comment!
Very refreshing in this world of consumerism gone mad and yes I still use my D7100.One camera I think you would love is the D700 as the colour rendering from this beast has never been bettered in my humble opinion.Unspoilt by progress!
I hear good things about the D700 for sure, haven't used one yet though. I have a D800E which I really like a lot though - especially for tripod work. Thank you for taking the time to comment, I really appreciate that.
Exactly. I use the D700 for its natural deep colors. I also have the D7200, which I am going to keep too. Wonderful camera.
@@loneshootr do you think the D7100 would be good enough for wedding work in 2022 with good glass and good photographic knowledge of course?
@@scottwesterman221 I shot some weddings with D7000 and SB800 speedlight, not know why you couldn't do same with the improved D7100. And two SD slots. :)
I remember watching your review , just as I bought the D7200 with Sigma 17-50 F2.8 HSM lens. After hearing your no nonsense review , it was obvious I had made the right choice. Quality glass is really the differentiator, not the bodies
Iver Heath - yep you've got a great camera and really nice lens there - enjoy creating images, and thank you for taking the time to leave a comment. I really appreciate that.
Wow! nice ! Very direct, straight to the point and knows exactly what he is talking about. Something I have learned from this video is Great lenses you want to invest your money and I don’t need an expensive camera.
Very wise video. We share the same camera philosophy. Here I am in 2022, a working motion photographer who uses a D7100 when my check depends on getting the still images and there is no second chances. My run and gun one man style makes me carry only what i need. I work outside often in heat way over 30c, chalky dust, heavy rain. The camera keeps going after the full frame Canon R5 gives up. I often been tempted to let the Nikon go but I can't as it proves to be my insurance when the shots count. It is also the one I carry when i travel and have to stuff one in a backpack with 2 lenses or in my saddlebags for my long road trips. Activating the crop function gives me almost double focal lengths which extend my reach when i can not get closer.Yeah like you, I need to buy a low shutter count one to replace the high mile beast that keeps me fed. Needless to say I am a new subscriber to your channel. Look forward to your posts.
Thank you kindly Ted.
From this eighty four year old, thanks for getting rid of the bullshit. From my first brownie, through Ilford Sportsman via Miranda and Pentax Sf1 to Nikon D3200, sales pitches are sometimes outrageous in the claims. I finally purchased a D7100 with very low shutter count for a very reasonable price. It is a fantastic camera. It does virtually everything well. Battery life is good as is the handling. There is no real advantage in buying the latest camera in this range. Sure, the D7500 will have some features extra. But, is it worth spending a pile of money when this will do just as well for considerably less money? And, yes, spend the savings on glass.
Brian Lager - thanks for the great comment Brian, appreciate it.
Yep, D7100 is capable enough to get the work done for sure.
For me, the Nikon D7100 is a tank. I work with this model for five years now and I am very relaxed working with the D7100.
Thank you for the video.
Best wishes from Canary Islands un Spain.
Yep D7100 gets the job done. Best wishes back to you my friend, thank you for your comment.
That shot with the horse in black and white looks amazing!
Thank you!
Nothing wrong with the D7100 in my opinion. High-res files, great autofocus, good dynamic range, compatible with old Nikkor lenses - which is a big plus for me - and light to carry arround. You're dead on regarding sharpness, the resolution is so high that it demands absolute solid technique and/or a tripod to really get that extra detail. I use it mainly for macro photography and I'm more than happy with the results.
two years ago my father bought this camera for me and I've been using it for landscape and portrait. love it.
And I agree, invest in lens rather than body.
every year or two there'll be new camera body with little upgrade but a great lens always a great lens
Antonius Wido - Exactly right, lenses are the key purchase. Thank you for your comment.
This is my camera of the last few years, glad to see your videos. I found you on the horse photography video, (thank you!)
Thank you Jennifer.
Great commentary, thanks! I loved the part "you do have a contract?". Sage advice all around.
Thank you my friend.
The D7100 is one of the finest DSLR cameras made thus far. Adequate functions and facilities and perfect sensor of APS-C at 20Mp. I love mine and as I'm 'getting on a bit' I'll never go to mirrorless.
What a pleasant change to find a clear, concise video without all the loud American style razzamatazz. Many thanks.
Thank you Peter.
Great video, brilliant to see such stunning photos with a D7100. I have one which I had bought to replace a D200 as a birding camera. However I have found the D7100 frustrating for birds in flight with really inconsistent results. So much so, I had replaced it with a D300s and had been planning to list it on Ebay. However, since watching this I plan to give it another chance. Looking forward to more videos and happy to join on Patreon. All the best, Mick
Hi Mick, firstly may I thank you for your kind support of my humble channel - I very much appreciate that.
I must admit that I have not often shot bird-in-flight, so I wouldn't be able to comment with any authority on the D7100's capabilities myself - I certainly accept your words on the subject.
I will say that I found the focus system on D7100 quite exacting to set up for what I used it for - and I went down a few blind alleys until I found what worked for me.
I think I view the D7100 as a jack of all trades camera really 😊
@@loneshootr Hi, glad to be on board. Looking forward to learning some useful skills, I am going try that fuscia shot! I have found the D7100 produces some great images but I am wondering if my mistake in photographing birds in flight was shooting in burst mode and it just struggled to keep up. If I am using RAW files in burst mode its results on birds in flight aren't as as good, JPEG seems better but I prefer the flexibility of RAW for post production work in Lightroom. But moving forward I will try in single-shot mode and see how it goes. I hate to give up on it, because it's a great piece of kit.
Great video, thanks, appreciate your opinion on the D7100, but I’m buying in 2022/23
I have a D7100 for many years now, i do macro with it, + D3 for a sports and wildlife, best money, tanks of a Nikon, long battery. For what i shoot realy i dont see the slightest reason to buy camera of more price, yeah they do have better qualities and stuff, but i am not limited by my cameras so far. Love videos of older cameras, so nice to see people who review the stuff they love, not the iones they paid for. Interesting if you still with d7100 in 2022?
Unfortunately I had to sell most of my gear in 2020 when the pandemic killed my business. All the Nikon stuff went (apart from the film cameras)...
Having said that - yes, I'd be totally happy to shoot a D7100 in 2022 😊
The Nikon D7100 camera is still a very capable camera to this day, very well built, and easily the quality of some of Nikon's pro cameras.
The D7100 merely lacks a bit of sophistication, such as more sophisticated auto-focus capabilities, and a super fast buffer. It's the best DX camera ever made by Nikon.
I entirely agree with you Scott.
I'm just a hobby photographer had D5000 that thing turd I threw it off a bridge and went out got D7100 1,200 brand new at that time they were coming out with the D7200. Happy with the D7100 been going for 6 years still going strong even the two accidents ahead with it .
Yep D7100 is a tough little bastard for sure
Wish all reviews were like this. Straight to the point and very detailed. Thank you and keep up the good work.
Mendax Seti Thank you for watching, and taking the time to leave a comment.
A great review
Thanks for sharing your thoughts and comments....yes I have a D7100 & love using it...I did upgrade to a D500 & still kept my D7100.... actually I should have just spent the money on better glass although my D500 is a great camera.... cheers from Australia 🦘🦘😊
I bought 1 of these last year and I love it. It’s my favourite DSLR, and the one that I go to for digital shots. I grab my F5 for film shots and the 2 of them together are awesome.
That F5 is an awesome camera.
Love the sound of your voice, I could listen to you read a book! Thanks for the info on my camera too! Happy shooting !!
Thank you for your kindness Ana.
The most honest presentation about general photography I have heard....!
Fleming Law - thank you kindly.
@@loneshootr Its a pleasure!!
I use the 7100's younger brother D7200 and love it....somewhat larger buffer but nearly identical...for sports/action/BIF I am looking at the D500 and for FX the D810/850.
Yep, 7200 is great. If you do go FX - that D850 is an absolute beast.
Great, short and to the point. 77 years old Marine disable veteran uses it for mental health therapy. Been then pills in my case. Thank for info.
charles rankin - Thank you for taking the time to comment Charles - and I agree photography can help so much with calming the spirit, it certainly helps me when things start closing in. Wishing you the best.
Hi, this was a good honest review.
I bought a D7100 new around 5 years ago, 2 years later I bought another but secondhand with under 5k clicks on it for £300.
Still very pleased with the results I'm getting with these two bodies.
Any chance of doing a review on the Nikon D200 (my previous camera) say in your line of photography please.
This is a great idea for a feature, showing there's life in some of the older cameras out there.
Patrick Hennessy - Thank you for taking the time to comment, it is appreciated.
Yes there are many older cameras I would like to review for sure - but unfortunately due to the economic effects of the pandemic I cannot afford to buy any cameras for the foreseeable future I'm afraid. In fact I've had to sell most of my cameras and lenses to pay the rent...
As soon as I am able I will certainly make review videos of many older cameras - the list is growing!
@@loneshootr Man, you are one of the most honest guys I saw on the youtube game... Nice Video btw!
You’ve inspired me, man... My trusty D7100 is about 7 years old and I figured I’d have to replace it soon given the mass move to DX and mirrorless
cameras. Well, I will be buying another body, another D7100 as backup. Thanks brother.
Good plan. Save the money for lenses!
Thank you for the video. Do you know if I can use it for live streaming?
just subscribed to your channel, i am wanting to learn as much as possible and i like your no crap attitude. thank you Jeff
deane9050 - Thank you Jeff - and welcome.
I use my D7100 for Wildlife and Astro photography.
Great camera with the right lenses.
Agreed. To me, the right lens matters more than the body
Really inspired by this beautiful video.
One question please help me out, really confused, my preference is photography.
Is it worth buying nikon d7100 over nikon d5600 or canon 200d ii.
All three costs almost same in 2021 currently in my country.
??????
Hi Chiranjit - There is no straightforward answer to that comparison really. But I'll try!
If you want a strong robust weather sealed body to shoot in all weathers - landscape work for instance - a camera that will serve you not only as a beginner, but will continue to be satisfactory as you become proficient... D7100.
If you want a smaller lighter camera, no weather sealing, simpler to use but still immensely capable and with good video capabilities also - Canon 200Dii (250D) SL3.
@@loneshootr means a lot for the reply.
Thankyou so much for helping me to take decision....
D7100.
Thank you for a truly honest, crap-free, review. Very refreshing. I bought mine soon after it came out. It's more of a camera than I need and has so many features that I will never use but Iove trying to improve my photography. I would love to know what lenses you use, (and why) even though I'll probably never spend a fortune on top spec lenses.
Thanks Roger. My favorite lenses (for my equine work) are the Micro Nikkor range, 60mm 2.8 & 105mm 2.8 (later versions).
I mean seriously 😳…. I got mine brand new in 2013 since then shot not much dew to several reasons. But from last few months thinking to upgrade but only factor stoping me to doing so it is the price and devalue too much. Cut the long story short I really appreciate your effort to made review for Nikon D7100 n from now going to have it with me for another years and will get another separate mirror less body 😊. N again I absolutely agreed with the fact invest in glass and i’m still using my 15/16 years old glass and work great so far with some new glass. Sound like u’r an old school other wise everyone running for megapixels 🙈🔥😖… as I produce some of best images back in time with Nikon D1x. Any ways great effort and we respect that u made for people like us. 🙏😇
Have one since release, magnificent camera. Only thing that’s itching me to upgrade is the size. The newer Z series is just a bit smaller and with my small hands fits a bit better.
Alright I'm taking your advice. I just ordered a d7100 to start my photography career. Now what do you recommend for the best editing system on a budget? Thanks again and you're now my photography sensei.
Roy Ragnar - Way to go, good choice, and wise. Now then... editing software...
I still use Adobe Photography Package even though I'm not a working 'pro' these days - though I'll probably cancel it when my annual subscription ends. It costs £9.99 a month by the way, includes Lightroom & Photoshop etc., and I'm so used to it that I will miss it. It is a terrific setup in my opinion.
However, I have a free recommendation: Download RawTherapee for your raw processing - it looks quite daunting when you first start but there are great tutorials on you tube - it is a very powerful raw processing tool though.
Then for further image manipulation (using layers etc like Photoshop) download GiMP. It works in tandem with RawTherapee and together they are very powerful. I used to use these two for pro work before I went the Adobe route.
Both are free downloads.
Hope this helps you Roy.
@@loneshootr thank you so much. Downloaded and using it now. Stay warm!
Which inkjet do you recommend for your horse pictures? I know. How long is a piece of string kinda question, but it would be interesting to know what you choose.
william Oneill - I'm not really qualified to answer with any authority on the subject I'm afraid - sorry William.
I outsource all my printing to a trusted print lab I've used exclusively for my pro work.
When I was considering a printer I did look at the Canon PROGRAF PRO-300 but decided against it - I only produced prints for clients who paid in advance so it seemed pointless to spend the money on something that could go wrong lol...
I am about to patent a piece of kit which will be universally accepted as a standard string length so the " How long is a piece of string " ? will be obsolete also i am in consultation with Ronseal to use recyclable organic containers to be able do away with " It does what it says on the tin " which has been grossly over used.I reckon that's the best idea since sliced bread !
@@twiglet2214 not to mention that sliced bread was a fairly half assed idea in the first place, hardly a yardstick of advanced technical innovation to my mind. Ready buttered bread - now we're nudging into Nobel territory.
It would also appear that I'm the only one who actually knows how long a piece of string is.
And how many beans make five.
Oh yes.
@@loneshootr Ironically the inventor of dynamite had a peace prize named after him - at the end of the day.Technically speaking he was an animal impression trainer and his speciality was teaching punters to do Lion impressions - he did a roaring trade ! No existential paradigm for our Alf vis-a-vis string length - he just blew it to pieces ! Piece of cake but explosive ordnance not my cup of tea so i'll shutter up now...now the only thing that's getting me down is gravity.
I've had my d7100 for six years and it will stay in my bag. I'm getting into drone photo and video for school, I traded my d4s for a drone setup and kept the d7100 for everything else I shoot.
Good Nikon model D7100. Today 2022 yr real cheap 250 €. Other countries 260 dollar. Shuter longest 2.000.000 photography.
Good video HD sound audio dark wide low Light
Raits Hots - yeah and they're getting cheaper all the time.
Started with the D3100(2013), then D7100(2015), then D700(20019) and finally D3's(2021). And i still own them all.
I love this camera and am looking to add another body to my stable, thank you so much for recommending this body. Great video
Where would someone procure that fancy periscope viewfinder attachment?
Ebay is a good start, usually one or two on there. (Nikon DR-6)
@@loneshootr thank you!
Bought mine last year when KEH did a 15% off Nikon bodies sale. Got it like-new for around $300, was an "upgrade" from a D3400. Absolutely love this camera. Use it mostly for wildlife and it works pretty well. I have been eyeing a D500 but with so many buying up cameras now that they are stuck at home and need a new hobby, hard to find one for a decent price.
That's a great price, and yes I agree - D500 would probably be a good fit for your purposes. As for prices - I initially thought that this lockdown might mean cameras at lower prices on the used market, but as you say, that's not how it's looking...
The D7100 is a very capable camera and as you pointed out so affordable you get a lot of camera for very little money great video and wonderful photography
Indeed it is! Thank you so much for watching - much appreciated.
what is the best and affordable lens for wide angle especially for Interior photography in your opinion sir?
Alfred - Everyone will have a different view on this - but I can only speak for lenses I actually use, and for wide angle interior work - real estate for example - I use a Sigma 14mm f2.8 EX HSM. It is rectilinear and so it shows minimal distortion to straight lines. I have heard good things about the Samyang 14mm f2.8 manual focus lens, but I have not tried one - so I can't say for sure. Hope this helps, and thank you for watching.
@@loneshootr yeah! it really helps and Thank you very much man for sharing your opinion. Hope you doing great there and stay safe ! =))
Base in your experience, shutter count really count that much when buying a use camera? I’m planning to get a D7100 with 100k.
Danjo De La Gala - only if it is VERY cheap.
There are plenty around at good prices and under 50k actuations.
@@loneshootr $180 with a 18-55 and 2 batteries. Tks for your response I like your content. You got yourself a new subscriber sr.
@@DanjoPeru Well, D7100 shutter is rated for 150k - so it may be worth buying... try $150 maybe.
Thank you my friend.
Awesome review! Is the camera suitable for 24x36" prints with amazing detail from close viewing distance? Does it produce stunning colors SOOC or during image editing? Can it rival Nikon D800 if shooting at ISO100 only with sharp lens and stitching images for panoramas? I would like to print landscapes on metallic papers behind acrylic glass where colors and details matter a lot.
Well, I've had many high quality 3ft x 2ft prints from a 7100 - but only if the lens quality is high. For extreme detail and 6ft x 4ft prints I used to use a D800E but again, the lens matters far more than the body really.
In my experience of making large prints, most cameras are more than capable if paired with good glass and the image is well shot. I've always made large prints for my type of work and my 12mp 5D worked just fine 😎
@@loneshootr Thank you for the detailed answer and different point of view. What you say sounds encouriging. Most photographers don`t print large and they always say "you don`t need much dpi because of the viewing distance" but in my case I need fine detail from very close distance becauste the product asks for premium price.
Would you recommend a simple lens like Nikon 35mm f/1.8G AF-S as perfect for resolving fine detail for 24x36" prints?
I ahve heard stories about gorgeous prints at the same size from 5D classic and knew it had to do with the weak AA filter but still most photograpers do not care at super fine detail because of the viewing distance.
Is it possible to achieve my goals with a 5D and a Canon EF 50mm f/1.8
II as well?
@@Classicdslr I can really only speak of my own experience in this and I can't actually remember what I thought of the 35 1.8G AF-S...
The best results I had were using a D800E with any of the later MicroNikkor range of lenses - in particular the 105 2.8.
As you know, the D800E - although it does still have an AA filter - the AA filter is 'neutralised'.
Having said that, the difference is just about imperceptible in 99% of shots!
D7100 has no AA but I never saw the difference...
When I've been aiming for fine detail in a shot to printed large, obviously I've avoided the wider apertures so I never felt the need to pay for superfast lenses in this respect.
As for the 5D and 50mm - viewing distance rules will apply.
If I'm reading you right, you need a setup to enable perceptible fine detail at way less than normal viewing distances. To obtain that 'clinical' sharpness is about the only time I would ever suggest a high megapixel count to be honest.
I think if I was in your shoes I'd be looking for a good used 5DSR together with any of the lenses which can resolve what that sensor is capable of - 100mm f2, 50mm f1.8 being the cheapest pair - plus L lens range.
(I did own a 5DSR and it is still a phenomenal camera regardless of its age).
Second choice would be D800E and Micro Nikkor lenses.
I hope this is of some use.
Drew
@@loneshootr Thank you so much for sharing so much of your experience here. I was hoping Nikon D7100 would be suffieciant but I see I need to aim for better. Have read Nikon D800 has multiple issues so D800E should be the minimum from Nikon`s side. Have also read 5Dsr has limited dynamic range and not so good colors when shadows are lifted. I know most people who write those things do not even print but hearing the oposite opinion from someone who actually prints and deffinitely knows how to shoot and edit images I bet you are right. Thank you.
Hi mate... where did you get hold of that periscope from? I did some pet photography a couple of days ago and could have done with it for getting super low
Found it on ebay - prices vary wildly though. This one's a Nikon DR-6, but fits some apsc Canons. Not sure but I think I paid around 75 for it.
Superb for dog photography.
Hi: still waiting for your video on equine photography, meanwhile, what is the periscope on your d7100? Is it a DR-6?
Brian Rankin, UK
Yup - DR-6. A series on equine photography is in the works.
I still use the D7100 as it’s a workhouse and does the job perfectly, I bought a another as a back up.
Great video, straight to the point!
I'm thinking to upgrade my d3400 in terms to upgrade focusing ability with d7100/7200 or full frame d610/d750 for general use, landsapes, streetphotography, kids, portraits.. What is your opinion about the choice? Thanks!
Just my personal opinion - if I were you I'd go for a D800 really. They are a reasonable price used now and are superb cameras. I can't honestly comment on D610 or D750 as I've no experience with them. The 610 is fairly cheap now, but having used a D800 (E) for 3 years I can recommend it.
@@loneshootr thanks for your reply, yes d800 is fantastic camera, will consider it too!
Hello good day, I'm getting a deal on a d7100 and a nikon 35mm 1.4 lens for $600 is that a good price? The shutter count is 43k.
Kavir l03 - depends which dollars - Canadian, not so great - US, good enough
@@loneshootr it's us
@@kavirl0390 is a fair price I think 🙂
how well does it shoot video?
Have you done any videos on your equine photography with the 7100, with detais of lenses and settings? That's my main interest here in UK.
Brian Rankin
Brian, I'm working on that very subject right now as it happens. I have shoots this week which I will be videoing in order to break down the process and exactly what I am looking to capture for the client.
@@loneshootr I shall look forward to that - thanks.
My D7500 is now up to 388,000 clicks now,, still running like the day it came out of the box. I used to worry about the shutter count, but now I don't think about it. I just pick up the camera and switch it on. In my seventies, fighting cancer, the D7500 will probably outlast me.
I was looking for a camera to replace a d90 I bought new back in 09 to be able to do larger prints or crop compositions without losing too much detail. Picked up one of these 7100s and what a nice camera. The one thing and it’s with all of them maybe I am defective but I still like a split screen focuser. I always loved that about the old manual cameras. I had a nice ground glass one I paid a premium for back in 09 for the d90. I was fortunate it fit the d7100 because the company that made it went out of business years ago.
Ah that's really cool - I agree about the split screen too.
Which lenses would you recommend to make the most out of Nikon d7100. I am looking at sigma 18-35 1.8 hsm dc for portraits and landscapes. Thank you in advance!
Dionisios Melogiannidis That Sigma is a fine lens. Lenses I recommend are any of the Micro Nikkor 2.8 lenses - 40mm and 105mm in particular. The 105mm is superb for portraits. Thank you for watching, and for taking the time to comment - I really appreciate it.
@@loneshootr thank you for your reply!
Where did you buy the periscope?
Hector M Pagan - used, on ebay.
Awesome review mate thanks, you have helped with my decision
Glad I could help
Thank you. This informative video has helped me a lot
Thanks Clint.
When I take photos at events (Skis) I have an A6500 with a 70-300m lens which works perfectly.
My problem that I now discovered is when these skiers get closer, I need to be able to quickly have a different lens. So an secondary camera would help alot.
Of which I am now looking at this particular camera, as it seems to hold the measure of my goal and the price is reasonable(Mabye not as fast compared to my A6500) but still.
What about the longevity of the on-board lithium battery for saving camera configuration settings? I thought lithium batteries were usually rated at lasting around 5 to 7 years.
Interesting question Shaun. I have absolutely no knowledge on the subject unfortunately, forgive me.
All I can say is that being a regular user of 'out of date' cameras - I haven't personally experienced such a failure with any of them, yet.
Maybe someone else might chime in here with the relevant knowledge.
what lens do you use?
Hi Jenni - three lenses mainly, old Nikkor 50mm f1.4D, MicroNikkor AFS 105mm f 2.8, and MicroNikkor AFS 40mm f 2.8. Sometimes an old manual Helios 44-2 58mm f 2.
Can I stick to the lens kit (18-140) that comes with it ? ... I'm planing to get 50mm 1.8 as a beginner
Ali Naqi - yes my friend, 18-140 is a really useful lens.
@@loneshootr thanks so much 🙏
When Legends say you need only the minimum requirements...all should take heed! Excellent video.
Josua M N - not even a legend in my own living room - but a very kind comment - thank you!
You doing ok Lone shootr? We all miss your videos and knowledge drops !
Brad G - yeah I'm doing ok, thank you for your kindness brother. I've shot the same video maybe four times (a video about my Canon 5D) and I'm just not producing what I want.
So I'm trying different styles. I just want my videos to be better than they have been...
@@loneshootr ok good to hear and I can respect that. Look forward to it! Just came across your channel not long ago but really enjoy the content!
Sir, do you still use d7100 now?
Sir, can you names some Nikon good lens to use with d7100
do you think the D7100 would be good enough for wedding work in 2022 with good glass and good photographic knowledge of course?
Yes Scott. I would happily use the D7100 for wedding work.
@@loneshootr many thanks appreciate the reply !
I am going to purchase d7100
Is it good for street photography, outdoor shoots?
Yes, definitely
Picked one up for my son. Looks like a great camera
i have a problem with my D7100 it will indicate that it is in focus then when i review the photos the subject is slightly out of focus and the background is in focus. i really would want to fix this issue and i haev tried everything.
Why don't you use D500s? just curious.
No reason - things just went this way. D500 is excellent in my view.
Is tht useful for making vlogs and b-roll?
My personal view? For vlog/broll etc - go Canon or Sony. You need that good autofocus. M50, SL2, 80D, - all cheap and great AF. I don't know much about Sony, but the AF on newer cameras seems great. AF on this Nikon is poor in live view. Great stills cam though.
@@loneshootr thanku soo much for the information ❤️
had the D7200 for 5 years. fantastic camera. took a lot of good images with that rig.
Bayou Josh - Yep for sure. I used to have 2 D7100's as my main equine photography workers, but a strap mount pulled clean out of the body on one in mid-shoot. (Juggling 2 cameras while shooting fast action - I can't afford such a failure!). This was the only reason I stopped using them really - other than that they were perfect.
Are you kidding me. If you are not making money with the device, this is gold.
Had the privilege to shoot with Z7II with kit lens, and it made no difference. For people who shoot people or action for money sure, but me with D7100 and Tamron 17-50 I'm more than OK. I just wish people start selling old glass quickly.
Daniel Sabic - yeah D7100 is enough for most, and definitely enough to make money with.
@@loneshootr Sure you can make money with it. But new cameras have so much more to offer, especially mirrorless with smart AF. You can even be a creep and shoot street photos of people from the waist with aperture wide open, and hit rate is great. This also means any journalist photographer of sport photographer just has to press the shutter button and the camera does all the rest. With D7100 you have to work little bit more.
But for anybody, especially professionals, if they know how to use a DLSR, they can easily get the job done with D7100.
Glad to see this, still watching the first 30secs but holding my new to me (used) d7100 to learn with :)
Thank you for watching and taking the time to comment. I hope my humble video confirms the wisdom of your choice of camera!
lone shooter lol your ‘humble video’ was extremely informative and confirmed my subscription, looking forward to more of these ‘the real talks’ (that’s what it felt like to me) - thanks for taking the time to share your wisdom
What do you think that's a good used price right now
pretty much as I said in the video really - it obviously depends on condition, shutter count, seller motivation... £200 to £350 maybe.
Hi, love your videos. I am new to photography and just bought a D7100. It comes with a 18-140mm lens. I bought it because it was on sale ($549, without tax, bought it at military exchange). I want to be a freelance photojournalist, but some people are saying that a D3500 or D5600 is better. Or, maybe I should get a better lens? Would like to know what you think.
AmbientRanger - the 18-140 AF-S is a great and capable all rounder, you'll find it very useful if you go towards photojournalism.
You'll probably have to deal with less than ideal lighting situations from time to time - so a Sigma 30mm f1.4 DC HSM for low light work would come in useful...
If budget is very limited, a basic AF Nikkor 50mm f1.8 lens would help you a lot. (The D7100 has the focus drive to operate the older AF lenses as well as AF-S lenses).
As for the body - D7100? You bought exactly the right one 😎
@@loneshootr Great advice! Thanx!
Great video. Very informative. Out of curiosity I looked on Amazon for the Nikon Right Angle Viewfinder and was surprised to see the DR 6 for £256! Cost as much as your camera body (if that is the same model). Although I’m sure you would’ve found it cheaper somewhere.
great review! also you remind me of Lemmy from Motorhead!
lou reed - Ha, that's a first for me! R.I.P. Lemmy.
I want a big and cheap camera full frame with a starter lens like nikon d5 with wifi and nfc max budget is 650€ and 2014 to 2018 . Its hard to chose
bruno Sousa - man that's a tough one. Plenty of good full frame bodies out there - but wifi/nfc .... none that I can think of in the price range.
@@loneshootr for a start maybe the p1000 . Love the zoom but cropped not a good thing . Better then nothing i guess . The 6d mark 2 is expensive yet and the D850 😢
@@brunosousa1977 its the wifi/nfc that's the issue really - without that you have a great bunch of options. D800E for one - superb camera.
Just a very intelligent review of a great camera. Thanks
Thanks for watching!
I would like to get a little more use out of my D7100 by using it to live stream. Any ideas how to get clean HDMI out? I am certain my viewers don't want my camera stats smiling in their face!
NadiaMavenOfMotivation - I believe that if you repeatedly press the 'info' button to scroll through the display options you'll eventually see a clean output display - certainly for external monitors/recorders. I've never used the D7100 for this but I'm led to believe it is possible... let me know how you get on !
Really like your video. Thank you for sharing your advice on the matter. I own the d7100 and thinking upgrading to a full frame for better quality and shots at darker environment. With d7100 I have serious trouble in low light situations. I've tried f1.8 lenses, but still not satisfied. Also autofocus problems even with high shutter speed and adjustments in camera settings. Maybe I still do something wrong...
Hm... not sure about the autofocus trouble - I've always found it to be satisfactory. Depending on the lens, shooting wide open apertures - 1.2, 1.4, 1.8 etc., challenges any af system sometimes. Experiment with AF settings in camera - it really pays off with a D7100. The wrong settings for your needs in any given situation can cause all sorts of issues.
What is your specific low light problem? High ISO noise in images?
@@loneshootr thank you for your reply. Yes too much noise and poor compensation at post editing. No way to shoot anything descent when the sun is down, only with tripod. But let's say I want some quick urban shots or something caught my eye.. I try with f1.8d 50mm to take portraits and it's very hard to produce a sharp image even with good light, high shutter speed and trying to be super steady. I can't figure out how people shoot super sharp portraits at f1.8 and what I am doing wrong.
@@dionisiosmelogiannidis5350 That's interesting you say you can't get get sharp images even in good light... it's possible you have a bad 50mm 1.8D lens - I have two, and the first one I got was so soft at 1.8 it was unusable. I had a 1.4D that was the same.
It's always worth seeing if it can be improved by calibrating the camera to the lens - 'fine tune'. There are many you tube videos on the subject.
It's worth trying first.
As for the digital noise - it is an old sensor now so won't be up to modern standards of course, but I have shot up to 1600 ISO and the images cleaned up well enough - but if you're going much above that, then yes, maybe time to upgrade to a more modern camera body.
I have to say though, I have shot many times in poor light and exposure and shadow recovery in Lightroom has always been satisfactory for me with the D7100.
@@loneshootr I never set iso higher than 800, 1000 if very necessary. It's always about the light. With good light comes a clean image obviously even with higher ISO. But I find it very inconvenient not being able to use at lower light. For example I could never take a shot from a performance at the theatre. I was trying to use the existing light , but in order to get a usable shot I should raise shutter speed and then it goes domino.. too high ISO and wide-open f.. not possible... There I thought ff, bigger sensor more light.. higher ISO and usable
Are you using "Matrix" metering? Also, I may be misunderstanding you, but it sounds like you're saying you increase the shutter speed for low light when it should be the opposite. Again I may be misunderstanding.
I have a D7000 and an old D300 but, like you said, with some good glass you can take some good pictures! But for birding and cropping the extra pixels of my D800 come in handy. And you're right, all that pixel peeping and now the mirrorless hype is a bit over the top for me. Gives us the opportunity to buy some good cameras second hand. I haven't explored even half of the possibilities the cameras are capable off anyway!
Intruder Grid - ah you have a D800... one of my favorite cameras ever (I had the D800E) - I really miss it. Great sensor, reminded me a lot of my old A7R sensor. May be same sensor from some of the info I've seen online.
I have had my D7000 since new and love it. I will add a D7100! Maybe a D800 too. I have several fast older lenses and legacy lens support is huge for me.
I've used the Nikon D40 for far to long as a hobby, now my shoots are a little more serious I'm looking at the D7100 but like most Brits I don't like spending money haha.. I cannot find a 7100 on ebay for less than 350 with high shutter counts. Great review, is their anything you can say on the Video recording? Thanks in advance
Mckenzie Davenport - I'm surprised you can't find a D7100 cheaper - you'll spot one at the right price soon enough I'd guess.
In all honesty, I can't give a helpful opinion on video on the D7100 as I only tried video once. The footage was ok, but not the greatest. Auto focus in video is an issue too...
I have seen competent video by others using the D7100, but I really see it as a stills camera to be honest - there are so many better options for video on a budget now.