Thankyou ma'am well explained ! Mam i would like u correct you here that section 18(2) says Oral evidence may be given of DATE but not of the CONTENT of document
S.18(2) Oral evidence may be given of time when it was signed, but as far as the CONTENTS=what kinds of documents has been signed, only for contents parts oral evidence shall not be given
Could you please make one video discussing about the running of limitation period wherein period of notice time is excluded while deciding the limitation period of recovery suit.
After the end of limitation period if a party acknowledge his debt or payment installment for his debt, does a fresh limitation period starts from that day and if it does then under which section it is mentioned??? Because section 18 only talk about acknowledgement before the end of limitation period
(2) Where the writing containing the acknowledgment is undated, oral evidence may be given of the time when it was signed; but subject to the provisions of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (1 of 1872), oral evidence of its contents shall not be received.
Question dec. 2007 (8)(a) in a scanner answer- a fresh period of limitation will not start from the date of acknowledgement , as the letter was not given within the original period of limitation . Please read question 2007 dec. 8a
Mam just not have words to express that how much helpful your lectures are.....just want to say thankyou so much for these wonderful efforts of yours
Thank you so much! I love the pace in which you explained, not too fast and not too slow. Great clarity in explanation.
Explanation crystal clear.THANKS.
Thank you so much mam
For this awesome lecture..
Your teaching skill is mind blowing..
I will surely refer your videos to my friends.
Ultimate style of explanation
Superp explanstion. Case law explained is like added wings.
आप का सादर धन्यवाद
Thankyou ma'am well explained !
Mam i would like u correct you here that section 18(2) says Oral evidence may be given of DATE but not of the CONTENT of document
Thanks mam.
Good
oral evidence of TIME may be given......
oral evidence of CONTENTS shall not be received.
The case law referred to by you is Lakshmi Ratan Cotton Mills Co. Ltd vs Aluminium Corporation Of India and not Lakshmi Nathan......................
Mam pls limitations act rule 26,27 bhi padha dijiye
Thank you for your best teacing❤
I have no words for your praise ❤
Nice explaination madam specially in soft language
Sec 18 ye video dekhne ke bad clr huaa🎉tq sis love you ❤
Very nice explained mam...
Superb mam thanks to explain with examples
Bhut acha karaya hua hai mam aapne..thanks a lot 🙏🙏
S.18(2) Oral evidence may be given of time when it was signed, but as far as the CONTENTS=what kinds of documents has been signed, only for contents parts oral evidence shall not be given
loved your videos on limitation act! they helped me a lot 🙏✨
Mam time run kase?? use kya baar baar 3 saal miltai rhegai kya jb sai acknowledgement hogi????
Good lecture Pakistan
well explained
Thank you fo detailed explanation
Nice explained mam, thanks a lot.
I am your fan from Pakistan
Could you please make one video discussing about the running of limitation period wherein period of notice time is excluded while deciding the limitation period of recovery suit.
Superb mem
Vry nicc well explained
Thankyou mam this is very informative 😎😎😎
Thankeyou ji
very well and easily explained
Mam JC Budhiya versus Orissa mining corporation Ltd ,AIR(2008) SC also tell us about nature ,scope and object of acknowledgement.
Nicely explained
Nice explained
After the end of limitation period if a party acknowledge his debt or payment installment for his debt, does a fresh limitation period starts from that day and if it does then under which section it is mentioned??? Because section 18 only talk about acknowledgement before the end of limitation period
Well explanation
Nregasoft Mobile monitoring system per video upload kare
Wow u r really genius
Thank u mem
Well explained !!
Nice lecture
Thank you so much 🙏🙏
Well interpretation 👌
Nicely explained..
Good one 👌👌
Superb
(2) Where the writing containing the acknowledgment is undated, oral evidence may be given of the time when it was signed; but subject to the provisions of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (1 of 1872), oral evidence of its contents shall not be received.
Thank u didi ❤
Nice 👌🏻
Nice...
Thanks mam.....
Can you provide soft copy of these lectures
Question dec. 2007 (8)(a) in a scanner answer- a fresh period of limitation will not start from the date of acknowledgement , as the letter was not given within the original period of limitation . Please read question 2007 dec. 8a
🙏🙏
Ma'am in written or singn nhi hai but part payment Ka proof Hai ki bank ke though payment hua part payment
Than what ma'am than hum Kya kr skte hai
Bank statement as a proof produce kr sakte ho
💯/💯
Please answer dec.2007 question (8)(a)
Siling Agriculture information
Mam aap khali cpc padatai hoo
Agar mil sakta hy to please reply kar den m email send krti hn
Are you on Instagram mam ?
Please reply
I want to talk you regarding one important financial case . Please let me know how to contact you
Nice explained