Nag Ashwin ke social media account pe kin logoko follow karta hai ye dekha 😢 uttar milgaya nag Ashwin communist or Mughals ka mahima Mandan karne vale Marxist historians ko follow karta hai
Prashant Dhawan has explained difference between "AD" and "CE". Using "AD" means its Christian but using "CE" is bit secular. But still foolish Hindus watched it without knowledge.😂
Many people are saying its Ashwatthama's POV so Karn was shown good But in Bhishm Parv Ashwatthama scolded karna In Go Haran Parv too Instead he asked Drona that Arjun is his friend so why he needs to fight him. NagAshwin is twisting Mahabharat
You are right weapon does not matter because power lies in the man himself. In Thor Ragnarok hela breaks mjolnir and thor feels helpless and weak without his hammer. Odin makes him realise that he is god of thunder and power is with him and he can fight without mjolnir and he fights the war with hela
Itne chiranjeeviyon ke rahte karn ko wapas janm lene ki kya jaroorat pad gayi wakai samajh nahi aaya. Main expect kar raha tha ki bhagvan bhairav se kuch related hoga Prabhas ka character but seeing climax I was heavily disappointed. Jai Kaal Bhairav 🙏🏻
सबसे हास्यास्पद तो यह है कि aswatthamaa को कर्ण का घनिष्ट मित्र दिखाया है, जबकि बहुत बार aswathhama ने कर्ण को मारने के लिए तत्पर हुआ था.. Kritvarma या कृपाचार्य को ले आते
@@shubh_chandrakar9334Bhai ye Bollywood nahi Telugu cinema ki movie hai agar sahi mayne me Mahabharat ko sahi justice de sakte hai vo sirf ss rajamouli sir hai aur koi nahi
@@shubh_chandrakar9334I doubt after watching kalki that ki rajamouli ji bhi leftist k propoganda me phas gaye honge karna k lekar. Abb mujhe darr lagra kahi rajamouli ji bhi karna ko anti hero dikhaye. because he is part of this movie.
Vo aise hi sarcasm me bol Diya tu itna seriously matle tu pura video dekh gadhe samjh pratik borade Bhai sach bol Raha hai kyu leftist woke ki mansik Ghulami kar rahe ho 😂😂😂😂
Even if we ignore the political aspect of the film like you said, overall the film as a story perspective was very average, like there was no maturity in the film. It felt like they were deliberately trying to show that they can also make films like Hollywood and made a cheap copy of star Wars, dune , etc.
@@PratikBorade watched today on netflix story bilkul average thi. Prabhas was joke in the film and pointless cameo of disha. Apart from Amitabh Bachan, nothing was worth it. Mere Taraf se 5 stars bas.
@@PratikBorademaybe he’s afraid that his HODs won’t be able get work after if they fully commit to our dharm. Certain wood don’t mind suppressing Hindu glory
@@PratikBorade If they want they can easily do that by just showing that PB character is a avatar of Lord Kaal Bhairava and ashwathama got confused in faces as he thought that he is karna he us one who can use vijay and same goes for karna vs arjun where it is his pov not the actual truth. I don't think Shambhala is a problem as they designed it with combination of Hindu and Buddhist symbols also it is last location where god exist as god is banned in that world by Yaskin and Kali it is confirmed in a comicbook strip released in SDCC and in movie that people are getting killed worshipping god, production designer of kalki that yaskin trying to potray himself as good that's why if you closely see Yashin and Lord Krishna atrie is bit same. Movie is brilliant but karna arjun thing was a problem for me as well but I hope nagi gives good explanation for everything in part 2 and 3
Prashant Dhawan has explained difference between "AD" and "CE". Using "AD" means its Christian but using "CE" is bit secular. But still foolish Hindus watched it without knowledge.😂
😂❤wah pratik bhao finally agaya detailed video meine toh aaasha hee chor diya.....chahliye der se toh der se aya toh sahi...now pratik bhao maharaja avesham ka video daaalenge yee hope karte h
मुझे महाभारत के विषय में इतना कोई ज्ञान नहीं मगर मुझे पहली बार यह पता चल रहा की कर्ण के प्रति सहानुभूति दिखाने का ये कारण भी हो सकता है....अब ऐसा महसूस कर रहा हूं कितनी स्वार्थी है ये दुनिया हर कोई अपने स्वार्थ का ही पक्षधर है चाहे वह वाम हो या दक्षिण आखिर सत्य क्या है? शायद कलयुग ही स्वयं में सत्य है🌔
Karan Arjun ke charan ke dhul barabar bhi nahi hai, evil, viel, bad friend, adharmi hai Karan, danveer hone se koi acha nahi ho jata, Ravan bhi to shiv bhakt tha, to kya wo acha ban gaya? Arjun maharathi hai, Pandu putr hai, Indra putr hai, krishna ke param mitr or bhakt hai, Pancho pandavo mein sabse mahan hai, Param krishna bhakt maharathi Arjun ki Jai. Hare krishn hare krishn krishn krishn hare hare hare ram hare ram ram ram hare hare.
@@ParthaPratim005 ek shlok atta nahi Mahabharata ka bolne se matlab hai unhe. Kintu mein nicha nahi dikha raha, unki bhi kya galti hai, sastro ko padhna to vilupt sa ho rakha hai. ye to dukh ka vishay hai ki is azzad bharat mein hamare itihas jaise ki ramayana or Mahabharata ko bus dekha jatta hai, padha nahi jatta, bahar ke desh jaise ki yunan ke log jo ub Christians hai phir bhi apne ancient Epics jaise ke illiad and Odyssey par garv karte hai.
@@marvelfan7268 haan galat dikhaya hai. Wo log ek underdog character banane ke liye creative liberty liye the. Tv serial bure nahi hai par wo ache bhi nahi hai. Mahabharat Jan na hai to padhna padega, ajj tak ki sabse lambi Kahani hai mahabharat, Bible se 5 gunna jyada verses(shloka) hai usme, tv serials mein hamesha us time ki audience or government ke hisab se changes hote hai, Geeta press ki mahabharat padhiye bharata shri.
@@sewardquart9641thankyou bhaii time nikal ke jald hi pdhenge Ek baar kisi video me Pratik borade ne hi BR chopda ke mahabharat ki prashnsa ki thi to BR chopda ka Mahabharat dekha tha aur Ramanand Sagar ki shree krishna v dekha usme v karn ko achha btaya gya hai
@@surrenderbohara2164 स्वघोषित बुद्धिमान महोदय आप के पिता जी की मूवी थी क्या जो तकलीफ हो गई मेरा मन मैं देखू न देखू मेरे कमेंट सेक्शन में आके अपने विशेष छिद्र में आनंद की अनुभूति करने आए होंगे कुछ भी हो आप लोग किसी भी तरह फील कर लेते है🤣
Mukesh khana ne ye v kaha tha ki Odisha or Bihar k log ye movie nahi samajh payenge. Wow, yani indirectly odisha k logo ko murkh bol rahe hay. Kya unhone odisha may bhagwan Sri jagannath ji k 5 mahan bhakt pancha sakha k dwara likhi gayi "Bhabiswa puran" or " malika" padhi hay. Ye padhli hoti to odisha k log Kalki Avatar k uper kitna jante hay inko pata chal jata.
Karna had no redeeming qualities in Mahabharata. He supports Duryodhana at every step in every decision. Only people who haven't even read a single shlok of Vyasa Mahabharata say Karna was a great character. You can't say you like Karna and then criticize Duryodhana because they were the same, hence their friendship bloomed so much.
Sir, is film mein problem hi problem hai. Main ek full time Kalki Bhakt hoon. Unke beej mantra aur stotra ke madhyam se unka awahan kar raha hoon. Jo facts Kalki maharaj ke baare mein Shreemad Bhagawatam Kalki puran aur bhavishya puran mein diye haan unme se ek ka bhi prayog is film mein nahi kiya gaya. Pehle toh ye date 2898 AD ghalat hai. Correct date 428989 AD hai. Kyunki Kalyug 432000 saal tak chalega aur abhi sirf 5500 saal hue hain kalyug ko shuru hoke.
Karn ko puri tarah se Villian kehna to galat hoga kyunki maa kunti ko unhone vachan dia tha akhir me ki we kisi bhi pandu putra ki hatya nahi karenge, ha Arjun k sath personal mamla tha!! (I'm not telling ki he was a good guy, but ha ye jarur he ki jivan me satya aur asatya ke bich bahut hi bada dharmsankat tha uske upar. Chahta tha ki duryodhan ka sath chodde lekin usne hi uski bahut badi madad ki thi islie shayad nahi chod paya) Baki apne jo bhi baate kahi film ka plot kya ho sakta tha, i totally agree, Ashwatthama ka character agar apne kie gaye gunaho se bhairava ko dharm ka gyan deta to ye bahut samajne jesi bat hoti!
Aap film ko criticise kar rahe hai toh log aapko gaali dete hai but agar koi goraa iss film ko review karte waqt criticise kartaa toh tab yehi ke log bolte ki foreigner sahi bol raha hai 😅.
Isliye India ek murkho ka desh hai ye main nahi ye Gore angrez log bolte hai sahi baat bhi hai India me murkh log zyada hai isliye unpad hai apni intelligence ka use karne ke bajay leftist woke logo ki baat me brainwash ho jaate hai ye dukh ki baat hai par ye harsh reality hai log sirf chatukar ban rahe hai
@SumitMahato-fm6my yeah urubhanga is like a kadambari/play written by bhasa, basically it justifies all the actions taken by duryodhana, shakuni an karna. These 3 evil characters are being humanised these days by leftists, the laughter of panchali to duryodhana , the chariot of arjun being moved instead of Krishna by karna these all nonsense are just part of some poetry,play,kadambari only but actual Mahabharata of vedvyas never contains these shit.Anyways Arjun is way way ahead of evil karna. In every battle before kurukshetra arjun defeated karna without any help from Krishna like battle of Virat,battle with gandharvas etc..
Prashant Dhawan has explained difference between "AD" and "CE". Using "AD" means its Christian but using "CE" is bit secular. But still foolish Hindus watched it without knowledge.😂
Mahanati is a good movie. The regressive aspect is there in every religion. So what do you want???? Dont show it, if it's a hindu family???? I must say, the selective targeting happens in movies. But, that does not mean anyone shows regressive hindu family is leftist.
Hindu bachchiyo ko chhod do.. unka Bhala kisme hai ye unke Mata-pita dekh lenge.. Nag Ashwin jaise kisi ko Humari bachchiyo ko Mata-pita ke viruddha bhadkane ki koi aavashyakta nahi hai.. Aur vaise bhi agar itne hi bade Liberal ho to yaha Jeher kyon ugal rahe ho aap ? Aapko to meri Abhivyakti ki Aazadi ka samman karna chahiye.. aap kyon meri aavaj dabana chahte hain ?
@@PratikBoradeI agree with you on every word yu spoke about kalki.. But ur above comment is I strongly disagree with that comment is reflection of ur deeply rooted regressive patriarchy mindset.. aur har kisi ke maa baap ache hi ho ye zaroori ni hai, koyi bi 100% right ni hota hai aur same way apne society me bi bohut khamiya hai n we need to address it n only thn we can improve
@@Avinashjha4247-p2s Here comes a bhagwa feminist. Lol. Maze ki baat toh yeh hai ki Hindu khud kab Marxist ban gaye leftist media aur academia ke influence mein unko pata hi nahi chala. Ghar pe Ram Ram Radhe Radhe japte hain aur bahar "regressive patriarchy" jaise subalternist (3rd wave Marxism) propaganda terminology use karte hain jaahil. Laanat hai.
आप जितना भी समझाए, आजकल ये युवा जो न महाभारत रामायण पढ़ते हैं और न ही उन्हें घंटनयों का कोई ज्ञान हैं या जानने की स्वदिच्छा हैं, वो इन कपोलकल्पित चित्रों को ही सच मानते हैं। कल्कि को अगर आप केवल एक छायाचित्र के अनुसार देखे तो ठीकठाक है मगर फ़िल्म एक मध्यम है जिस के द्वारा चित्रकार अपने सोच को जगत के समीप अभिव्यक्त करता है। अगर आप शुरू से गहन अध्ययन करे तो अश्वत्थामा का जैसे चित्रायन किया गया है वो ही गलत है। अश्वत्थामा ने भूपतित मुमूर्षु दुर्योधन को ये वचन देता है की वो पंच पांडव का सर काट कर लेके आएगा और इसी कारण से वो रात्रि में पांडव शिविर में जा के पहले धृष्टद्युम्न और शिखंडी का वध करता है और उसके उपरांत शायित पंच पांडव पुत्रों (द्रौपदी के पुत्रों) का वध करता है (अनजाने में)। पांडव नहीं थे तो वो पांडव पुत्रों का ही शिरोच्छेद करके दुर्योधन के पास लाता है और दुर्योधन समझ जाता है की अश्वत्थामा ने क्या पाप किया है। वो उसको कोसते हुए ही अपना प्राण त्याग देता है और अनुसोचना के कारण अश्वत्थामा मुनीवर महर्षि वेदव्यास के पास जाता है शरण मांगने। वहा पांडव श्री कृष्ण सहित आते हैं और तब अश्वत्थामा एक सूखे तृण को लेके ब्रह्मास्त्र का ध्यान करता है और पांडवों की और भेजता है। उसे रोकने के लिए अर्जुन भी श्री कृष्ण के आदेशानुसार ब्रह्मास्त्र चलता है और दोनो ब्रह्मास्त्र के संघर्ष से सृष्टि का विनाश रोकने के लिए वेदव्यास अपने तपोबल से अस्त्रों को रोकते है। अर्जुन को वापस लेने के लिए बोलने पर अर्जुन अस्त्र को वापस लेते है मगर अश्वथामा बोलता है उसे वापस लेना नहीं आता। अतः वो पांडवों का कुल नाश करने के लिए उसे उत्तरा के गर्भ में छोड़ता है और गर्भ में ही अभिमन्यु पुत्र का निधन हो जाता है। श्री कृष्ण तब उसके प्राण लौटाने का प्रण लेते है और अश्वत्थामा को अमरत्व का अभिशाप देते है और उसकी मणि भीमसेन उतार लेते है जिससे अश्वथामा की तेज लुप्त हो जाती है। श्री कृष्ण उत्तरा के पुत्र को पुनः जीवित करते है और जीवन मृत्यु की परीक्षा उत्तीर्ण करने के कारण उसका नाम परीक्षित पर ता है। फ़िल्म में कुछ भी नहीं दिखाया गया। बेन हूर - आ टेल ऑफ क्राइस्ट जो विलियम वालेस की किताब है और १९४९ में विविध पुरस्कार विजेता एक फ़िल्म के रूप में विलियम वाइलर ने बनाया, उस में जीसस क्राइस्ट का चेहरा नहीं दिखाया गया। उसी का अनुकरण से यहां श्री कृष्ण का चेहरा नहीं दिखाया गया क्यों की निर्देशक नाग अश्विन उससे बोहुत प्रभावित थे (इंटरव्यू में उन्हों ने कहा था)। अब अगर प्रभास की बात करे तो उसको एक ऐसी फ़िल्म चाहिए थी जो उसके डूबते करियर को पुनर्जीवित कर सके। वही काम इस फ़िल्म ने किया। जब फ़िल्म का निर्देशक ही महाभारत को पढ़ा नहीं हो और मन में कम्युनिज्म और हलेलुया घूमता हो तो फ़िल्म भारतीय दृष्टिकोण से बनेगा कैसे? अध्यात्म गहन अध्ययन का विषय है और उस का चित्रायन करने के लिए विश्वास होना आवश्यक है। तबोबल, मंत्र शक्ति, अस्त्रशस्त्र - इनको समझ ने के लिए धैर्य और विश्वास चाहिए जो आधुनिक निर्देशकों में नहीं हैं। उनको अपनी संस्कृति पे गर्व ही नहीं हैं तो उनसे ये अपेक्षा करना की वो इन विशोयों को धागे में पिरो कर एक अद्भुत चित्र प्रस्तुत करेंगे ये कामना करना व्यर्थ है। जब की इन विषयों को अगर सठिक प्रस्तुत किया जाए तो अत्यंत सुंदर फ़िल्म बन सकता है। और कर्ण का चरित्र तो सालों से वामपंथियों के लिए एक प्रोपेगेंडा का माध्यम हैं क्यों की कर्ण को कभी भी एकदम सत्यानुसार प्रस्तुत नहीं किया गया। सूत कोई गाली है ही नहीं क्यों की सूतों का महाभारत में विशेष सम्मान के साथ वर्णन हैं। परंतु उसकी उपस्थापना सर्वदा एक वामपंथी प्रोपेगंडा के अनुसार ही होता आया हैं। अब कर्ण को मुक्ति प्राप्त होने के बाद कहां से अचानक आ गया ये तो नाग अश्विन के मस्तिष्क में विराजमान नाग देवता भी नहीं जानते। अतः कुछ आशा न रख के एकबार देख लो और भूल जाओ!
Support!! I don't know what to say..... I really waited for this film and I was also a bit disappointed when I first watch the movie ...maybe because I expected something more and still happy for the grand representation of short time Mahabharata scenes and reference. But you are also right about the hidden ideology... I don't know what to say ... sometimes i became hopeless from all but still want to see the hindu epics on the grand scale..... let's see what they deliver in second part.
Namaste Prateek Ji ! It's really satisfying that you explained the philosophy in details. Prateek Ji, aapke samajh aur aapke geheri Bharatiya Vichar ko koti koti Pranam 🙏🙏 !! 🚩 Vande Mataram !!
भैया जब मैंने अंतिम में देखा की प्रभास का कैरेक्टर कर्ण है , और उसे जिस तरह से दिखाया गया , मुझे बहुत निराशा हुई की एक विलन को हीरो के रूप में दिखाया जा रहा है
Naag Aswin is current generation vyda vaas or valmiki. He is very good narrator on Hinduism. If you don't believe watch his first movie on yevade subramaniam on Himalayas trekking.
Prashant Dhawan has explained difference between "AD" and "CE". Using "AD" means its Christian but using "CE" is bit secular. But still foolish Hindus watched it without knowledge.😂
Pratik bhai.... Telugu movies have a long tradition of showing Karna as an anti-hero and not a villain. This is not based on Leftist leaning but on an old telugu version of Mahabharat written around 500 years ago. All telugu films showing Karna use this version of Mahabharat as a reference point. Its nothing to do with leftist ideology that came out in the 20th century. Regarding how Ashwathama influences the Prabhas character, maybe more details will be there in the sequel. Where was the time for all that in the first part. Here the story is about how to protect Sum80 and help birth of Kalki. They just cannot show Prabhas in tapasya for many years to gain all powers and knowledge. It wont make sense.
Christianity me mana jata hai ki Jesus dobara prithvi par aayenge, ise Second coming kaha jata hai.. Google par aap jankari prapt kar sakte hai.. Sanatan Sanskriti me Massiaha/Prophet jaisa koi concept nahi hai.. director ko apni Mahaan Secular soch apne pas hi rakhni chahiye !
Indian movies are suffering from substandard or mediocrity at best. Chaprigriri is prioritized in the name of appealing to mass but in actual people in the industry (except few) are incompetent and less intelligent to make high quality films.
बढ़िया review pratik borade bhai आजकल के reviewer को शास्त्रों, स्मृतियों व पुराणों का घंटा पता नहीं है इसलिए ऊनको कुछ पता नहीं चलता ऐसे फिल्मों के बारे में। जिनको ज्ञान है ऊनको पता है करण धुरयोधन के बाद सबसे बड़ा Negativity or villain character था महाभारत में
@HimanshuSaklani-d2o सनातन के अनुसार मोक्ष मिलने पर आत्मा से परमात्मा का मिलन होता है, फिर जीवन मरण का खेल वही रुक जाता है ☑️ तुम्हारे गीता में लिखा है, देख लो
Pratik Bhai Should start a podcast and should invite all directors and film makers who spread propaganda and are secular ! I'm really excited if it's happening !
Movies and directors like these are destroying our youth and the sad part is ke MATA PITA in sab pe dhyan nahi dete. Chalo puri mahabharat nahi padha sakte, atleast ye toh btao ke kon achcha and kon bura hai. Jai Shri Krishan
Pratik Bhai telugu me karna ka movie hai..which is like Bible to karna mastrubators..name is DANA VEERA SURA KARNA.. IN Which script was written by telugu DRAVIDIAN VAADI.. NTR SIR DONE IT TO promote south politics like Tamil karnan movie ..for his political benefits .voh movie dekho aap ka pura jawaab milega...
😂😂 NTR is Dravidian vadi😂😂….what a joke just look at his political costume…he has Rudraksha with orange dress(later Thackeray copied NTR Dress look)….even Vajpayee used to behave like secular and NTR is the one who created first BJP govt in centre…
@@nationalist7347 script writer is not sr.ntr.. he collaborated with a hardcore Dravidians then ..who wrote dramas. Of that sort...in telugu .. to promote regionalism ntr collabed with those forces for political gain
@@theexplorers452😂😂 just go and check credits it is written directed and even produced by NTR himself and he even played Arjuna karna Krishna on the same movie😂😂….just check first…if u bully guys like Ashwin no one will produce a Hindu movie and go to do rom com…because if guys like you even Rajamouli is afraid to make Mahabharat ….bcoz u idiots and leftist both will bully him
मुझे पहले ही doubt था, इसलिए में देखने नहीं गया; क्यूंकि पूरी Liberal Gang (Nagshwin, Dipika, Kamal Hasan etc.) इस film में included है और में अपने पैसे Sickular Gang को नहीं दूँगा I
@@DailyNewsNepal-kw2yo All versions of Mahabharat are similar in all of them Karna has been shown evil From Bori CE, KGM, C Rajgopalachari, Penguin Publication, Ramesh Menon, Gita Press all of them even some foreign authors as well BUT I don't remember their names Kalki is bad it is not based on Mahabharat
@@DailyNewsNepal-kw2yo I mentioned the name of all Mahabharat just search on google like this Mahabharat pdf Internet archive You will get access and read yourself Read all the versions of Mahabharat unabridged translation And Geeta Press Hindi as well You will get to know why I called him so(evil).
Galat, usne bahut deeply socha hai.. filmmakers murkh nahi hote.. soch samajh kar Yaskin ko Bhagwan Krishna ka Negative roop dikhaya hai.. iske bare me ek video bhi hai TH-cam par Kalki ke production designer ka..
@@gautamkiran559tum chinta mat karo pratik borade Bhai ko kuch nahi hoga vo thik uska mental health bhi sahi hai tum sirf leftist woke se dur raho unke brainwash hone se bacho
Jay Shree Ram Pratik Bhai! Sach bolu to bachpan me jab school ke pathyapustako me aur kahi saari idhar udhar ki kahaani ke kaaran main kaafi brain wash ho gaya tha aur Karna ko hi sabse positive character maanne laga tha aur bahoot saare alag alag tv shows me karna ka mahima mandan shuru kar diya gaya aur arjun ko thoda grey shade dene lage wampanthi producers aur main kaafi had tak brainwash ho chuka tha. Fir dhire dhire aapke channel ke madhyam se aur Ami Ganatra Ji ke bahoot saare videos dekhe aur meri aankhe khul gayi aur sahi itihaas ko jaanne ko prerit hua aur bodh hua ki karna ek negative character tha jisse wampanthio ne itihaas badal kar hero bana diya. Aur Mahabharat ke main hero Arjun hi the. Ab yeh Kalki ke makers bhi Karna ka Mahimamandan karne me lage hue hai. Telugu filmmakers se yeh bilkul expect nahin kiya gaya tha his telugu film industry ne humar purano se judi bahoor saari filme banayi hai bina kisi ched chad kiye. Aur Bharat ki tamam film industries me sabse zyada apne roots se aur sanskriti se judi koi film industry hai to woh keval Telugu industry hi hai. Yeh bahoot dukh ki baat hai ki telugu industry me wokism ka virus dheere dheere ghoosne laga hai. Shyam Singharoy bhi ek bahoot hi ghinoni film thi jisse bollywood ke elite critics ne bhi gungaan gaaye the. Yeh sach me bahoot chinta ka vishay hai. Bhagwan Shree Krishna ne kabhi bhi Ashwatthama ko yeh nahin kaha tha ki tum mere dasme avatar ko bachaoge aur prayashcheet karoge. Yeh sab makers ne apne man ka kachra daal diya aur jab Mukesh Khanna ne is baat ke liye film ka virdodh kiya to unhe saare youtube ke samosa critics nochne lage aur roast karne waale videos banane lage. Yahi dikhaata hai in sab ki ghinoni mansikta. Jay Shree Krishna. 🙏🙏
प्रतीक भाऊ, अगर हम इसी प्रकार हर एक फ़िल्म में कमियाँ निकालने का प्रयास करते रहेंगे तो आगे लोग भी विमुख हो जायेंगे. मैं समझ सकता हूँ कि ये फ़िल्म पूर्णरूप से हमारे ग्रंथों और धर्म के साथ न्याय नहीं करती, परंतु क्या ये आदिपुरुष की तरह अपमान करती है? अगर नहीं तो हमें इतनी घनिष्ठ निंदा से बचना चाहिए. आपके विचारों से मैं पूर्णतः सहमत हूँ परंतु इतनी जल्दी इतने विलक्षण बदलावों की अपेक्षा नहीं करनी चाहिये.
These people knowingly create such probl€ms. Don't tell me they dont have enough funds to consult indic scholars, etc. They want to portray wrong stories.
Without promotion Kalki collected 1000 crores+ even have mixed reviews this is something Prabhas stardom matters....but if any of his film is really good and liked by everyone then may be collection would be something else which cannot expect😅
Sach bataau toh movie dekhne mein accha toh lagtaa hai graphics action visuals etc but mereko yeh ek sastaa madmax movie lagaa aur Messiahvaad ko promote karne waala movie zyada lagaa. Hindu dharm messiahvaad ko promote kabhi bhi nahi kiye hain. Jab bhagwaan kalki janm bhi lenge toh kisiko bhi pataa nahi chalegaa ki unhone janm kab liyaa. Jab bhagwaan Ram aur bhagwaan Krishna neh bhi janm kiyaa tha tab bhi koi yeh nahi jaantaa tha ki woh bhagwaan hain. Jab valmiki ji neh ramayan likhaa aur vedvyas ji neh Mahabharat tab logo ko pataa chalaa. Overall movie aisaa nahi hain ki pasand nahi aayegaa par agar movie ko madmax jaisaa hi banaana tha toh bhagwaan kalki ka concept nahi lete, aur agar liye toh post apocalyptic world aur messiahvaad promote karne ki kya zarurat thi. Upar seh karn ko hero dikhaa rahe hain😅😅, ashwathama khud karn ko hate karte thain.Karn asal mein homelander ka baap tha(in nature) usko yeh vaampanthi log promote karte hain par bhagwaan Krishna ko galat portray karenge jabki sabse zyada dard unhone hi apne life mein jhelaa par woh villian nahi bane. Agar main kalki movie banaata toh main batman tone ka theme ka movie banaataa.
Even for me the Kalki 2898 AD was an absolute torture. This weekend I watched 2 movies "The UP Files" and Marathi movie "Gharat Ganapati (घरत गणपति). Honestly, The UP Files disappointed me a lot. It was very poor presentation and technically very weak. Yogi ji is a person to be taken very seriously and presented properly. Rather घरत गणपति is superb movie. Great photography, technically well made, nice music and most important is the importance of preserving our "Family System (कुटुंब व्यवस्था)".
Last me Yaskin ( kali ) *"jaganath ke rath ka chakra "* dialogue ka kya sense tha use bhagwan vishnu se compare kiya hai Edit - Kalki production designer Nitin Chaudhary ne khud ye confirm Kiya hai ki Yaskin ko Negative shade of Krishna dikhana
@@thannerulavanya4117 Nahi *Kalki* ke production designer ne ye khud confirm kar diya ki last scene ka idea tha Yaskin ko negative shade of Krishna dikhana he also said we can see similarities between them
Bhai tumko much nahi patha..aur vo dialogue telugu me bolne se acha hota he....isme bola tha ki jagannath ratha chakralu vasthunnay vasthunnay...means deepika is the rath and she is coming with sri krishna....said dialogue writer himself....and that production designer explanation is yaskin is not sri Krishna in -ve shade it is yaskin is complete opposite of sri krishna iska matlab he sri krishna ke guna se complete opposite he....@@anime-station1898
@@anime-station1898 Bro I say the whole interview and production designer didn't anything like that instead he said he see yaskin as a fallen god and atire similarity between Lord Krishna and Yaskin from pretty clear as in the they both were white clothes so that he can show himself as god or king and the dialogue things told previously. I think Lord Krishna evil side was used for click bait but if they showing yaskin and Lord Krishna same then can you give the time stamp if it is true then also adds to my problems kalki
"जय श्रीराम" प्रतीक भाई। आप 100 प्रतिशत सही हैं। प्राचीन समय में यदि राजा को मारने की आवश्यकता होती है, तो विरोधी उसके स्वादिष्ट भोजन में जहर मिलाते हैं। फिल्म निर्माता यही कर रहे हैं। महर्षि व्यास ने आने वाली पीढ़ियों को धर्म का पालन करने के लिए मार्गदर्शन करने के लिए महाभारत लिखी है। भगवान कृष्ण और अर्जुन इस महाकाव्य के मुख्य केंद्र बिंदु हैं। और महाभारत में भगवद्गीता सबसे मूल्यवान गहना। वे फिल्म के किसी भी दृश्य में आसानी से "यदा यदा ही धर्मस्य" श्लोक लगा सकते थे लेकिन उन्होंने सभी स्थानों पर पूरी तरह से पश्चिमी संगीत का उपयोग किया। सबसे बुरी बात यह है कि वे आखिरी दृश्य में अर्जुन को बुरे अभिमानी के रूप में कैसे पेश करते हैं। दूसरी ओर उन्होंने कर्ण का वीरतापूर्ण प्रवेश दिखाया। सिनेमाघरों में लोग तालियां बजा रहे हैं और मैं सोच रहा हूं कि लोगों को क्या हो गया है? कि मुझे यकीन हो गया कि निर्देशक का शुद्ध इरादा नहीं है। इसके अलावा विलन ने गांडीव धनुष को उठाया, वे आगामी फिल्म में कुछ और बदतर दिखा सकते हैं।
Pratik bhai aapke jaisa you tuber ya reviewers ko nhi aap mahaan ho bhai Aapko communist log dabane ki koshish bahut karenge darane ki koshish bhi karenge but aap pichhe mat hatna Mahadev ka Ashirwad sadaiv hi bana rahe aap par or aapke pure pariwar par Jai Shree Ram 🙏🚩🚩🚩
I was of the opinion director was targeting western and Christian audience all over the world and gave him benefit of doubt until you mentioned about his secularism in Mahanati. The ultimate litmus test to find if he is a secular or crypto or Dharmic person is to see if he promotes Karma and Moksha or true believers and hell and heaven
Prashant Dhawan has explained difference between "AD" and "CE". Using "AD" means its Christian but using "CE" is bit secular. But still foolish Hindus watched it without knowledge.😂
@@nationalist7347 Karan Johar ke production house ka naam bhi Dharma Productions hai to kya wo Sanatan Dharm ke vicharon par chalne wala aur Dharmic traditions aur ideology ko badhane wala thodi na ho gaya .... Hai to wo bhi secular ka baap aur Liberals ka pyaara 😐
Prashant Dhawan has explained difference between "AD" and "CE". Using "AD" means its Christian but using "CE" is bit secular. But still foolish Hindus watched it without knowledge.😂😂
8:30 what is curious is not only Hindu Rishi has not been shown by the director , I have not seen a Islamic mullah too. May be we should thank him for that as Islam completely denies any avatar or rebirth concept.
@@PratikBoradePratik Bhai.. this forced secularization of leading characters with Christian names is a serious problem. Shayad sabhi panth ko acceptance mey laane ke liye mool katha ko hee badalna galat hai.. The least I hope is in sequel the so called Karna is shown repenting for the choices he made during dwapar yuga and remorse by taking corrective actions in this punarjanm as bhairava.. otherwise it utter waste of opportunity other than some decently done special effects and battle sequences. The cowardice or timidity to show complete Hindu ethos by Hindu directors (Telugu directors are most Hindu remember no Tamil or Kerala director even goes this far as it’s too Hindu for them) is a problem and we have our own shackles to break out of this forced secularization mould. Love to see your comment on this Pratik bhai..
Jab janta kisi movie ko accept krti hai tb review aur criticism se kuchh nhi hota, waise Aapko toh bahubali, rrr story wise aur cinematic experience ke kaaran pasand nhi aayi thi, usme jo hamare hindu culture ko acche tarike se dikhaya gya tha isilye wo movie apko pasand ayi nhi toh bahubali aur rrr bhi apko pasand nhi aata. Aap toh hanuman ki movie ko bhi negative review diya tha. Toh kalki toh chhor hi do. Aap extremist ho, aur jb tk extremist ka bhoot apke upar sawaar hai tab tak aap movies ko enjoy nhi kr pavoge. janta movies dekh kr influence nhi hoti kisi ke paas itna time nhi hai, aap har ek movie mein khod khod ke hindutva nikalne ka koshish karte ho. Mera aapke liye 2 suggestion hai. 1) ya toh ye youtube channel band krke hindutva ka jhanda lekar niklo aur sabhi hinduo ko jaagrook karo. 2) ya ek achhe se psychiatrist ko dikhao khud ko. Pehla toh aap se hoga nhi, dusra hi better hai aapke liye.
@@Bharat-vq9uxanimal is masterpiece movie tujhe animal se itni problem hai to mat dekhna animal park tu khun ki ulti karega sooryavansham movie ke thakur bhanu pratap ki tarah 😂😂😂😂 animal is better than omg2 lapataa ladies and mirzapur series is bullshit hai 😂😂😂😂😂
Sahi mein....itne problematic themes ko badhava har jgah milta ja ra hai...aur log unhi themes ko pasand kr re hai....hum Hindus aaj itne divided hai aur itne influenced hai in leftist marxist propaganda se ki bohot dukh hota hai. Especially youth aur UPSC students mein.
Nag Ashwin ke social media account pe kin logoko follow karta hai ye dekha 😢 uttar milgaya nag Ashwin communist or Mughals ka mahima Mandan karne vale Marxist historians ko follow karta hai
@@yashjadeja2004 koi example?
Vaastav me naag nikla ye to😂
@@StudentUnion-nc1nw Aapne ek Video ki Link share ki thi, vo comment delete kyon kiya ?
th-cam.com/video/RL3H2UMryBU/w-d-xo.htmlsi=IXdsvoHaab0bwS0D
@@PratikBorade mene delete ni kiya. Pata ni kuch technical issue aara h.
वाह प्रतीक भाई, आपने जो कहानी बताई अगर वो होती तो शायद लोगो के दिमाग में कहानी छप जाती और शायद सबसे बड़ी हिट होती
Eski ko bol na flim banye ke liya 🤣🤣🤣 jhatu youtuber sala esko to KGf movie pasand nahi aaye to kya ho gaya 😜
Exactly 💯🕉️🚩🇮🇳💕
finally ...isi kaa toh wait thaa... thank you so much for talking about this film"s philosophy ... film release ke din se wait kar raha thaa..
Totally agree with you 👍👍👍When Karna is introduced as most powerful Warrior in "Kalki 2898 AD" , I wasn't able to see the screen 🙂🙂🙂🙂
@@saisumanthdss1919 according to Ashwadhama , shei Krishna and pandavas are his Enemy. Then why is he saving kalki ?
Prashant Dhawan has explained difference between "AD" and "CE". Using "AD" means its Christian but using "CE" is bit secular. But still foolish Hindus watched it without knowledge.😂
@@saisumanthdss1919I, ahabharata ashwathama hate karna and say you are not even a rather UT ardhrathi you are not capable to lead Gaurav sena
Many people are saying its Ashwatthama's POV so Karn was shown good
But in Bhishm Parv
Ashwatthama scolded karna
In Go Haran Parv too
Instead he asked Drona that Arjun is his friend so why he needs to fight him.
NagAshwin is twisting Mahabharat
You are right weapon does not matter because power lies in the man himself. In Thor Ragnarok hela breaks mjolnir and thor feels helpless and weak without his hammer. Odin makes him realise that he is god of thunder and power is with him and he can fight without mjolnir and he fights the war with hela
But then he makes Strom breaker 🤡
Itne chiranjeeviyon ke rahte karn ko wapas janm lene ki kya jaroorat pad gayi wakai samajh nahi aaya. Main expect kar raha tha ki bhagvan bhairav se kuch related hoga Prabhas ka character but seeing climax I was heavily disappointed. Jai Kaal Bhairav 🙏🏻
@SumitMahato-fm6my 😂👌🏻
सबसे हास्यास्पद तो यह है कि aswatthamaa को कर्ण का घनिष्ट मित्र दिखाया है, जबकि बहुत बार aswathhama ने कर्ण को मारने के लिए तत्पर हुआ था.. Kritvarma या कृपाचार्य को ले आते
@@zroth3734 भाई बॉलीवुड वालो के ज्ञान को कोई टक्कर नहीं दे सकता
india k historical movies bhi mythology jaise dikhte hai aur foreign k mythology movies bhi history jaise dikhte hai
Bollywood se kya ummeed karoge bhai
Rajamouli bana skte hai
Agar vo bahubali jaise banaye to 🙏🏻
@@shubh_chandrakar9334Bhai ye Bollywood nahi Telugu cinema ki movie hai agar sahi mayne me Mahabharat ko sahi justice de sakte hai vo sirf ss rajamouli sir hai aur koi nahi
@@shubh_chandrakar9334I doubt after watching kalki that ki rajamouli ji bhi leftist k propoganda me phas gaye honge karna k lekar. Abb mujhe darr lagra kahi rajamouli ji bhi karna ko anti hero dikhaye. because he is part of this movie.
Mein v murkh darinda orthodox regressive mind ka hu bhgwan muje v buddhi de😔😔😔lgta murkhta ke daldal mein doob chuka hu pratik bhao apke sath
Vo aise hi sarcasm me bol Diya tu itna seriously matle tu pura video dekh gadhe samjh pratik borade Bhai sach bol Raha hai kyu leftist woke ki mansik Ghulami kar rahe ho 😂😂😂😂
Even if we ignore the political aspect of the film like you said, overall the film as a story perspective was very average, like there was no maturity in the film. It felt like they were deliberately trying to show that they can also make films like Hollywood and made a cheap copy of star Wars, dune , etc.
Bilkul sahi kaha aapane..
Ashwathama looked serious and stable and a lot powerful
@@aryansingh-zc8wb😂अगर वो भी ये मूवी देखेगा तो खुश नही होगा कि ये कितना गलत दिख रहे फ़िल्म में।😂
@@PratikBorade watched today on netflix story bilkul average thi. Prabhas was joke in the film and pointless cameo of disha. Apart from Amitabh Bachan, nothing was worth it. Mere Taraf se 5 stars bas.
मैने भी ये नोटिस किया प्रतीक भाई ,कोई भी symbol नहीं था
Mahanati toh Rajamouli ji ki one of favourite movie thi 2018 mein…Rajamouli ji ne Insta story bhi daali thi
Koi dusre ki vahiyat movie ko kuch nhi bol skta
Rajamouli just being diplomatic nothing else
Pratik ne khud badhiya review diya tha 2018 me
That's because of Savitri's story
@@tanmaychavan283😂😂 Rajamouli is an atheist….and he is Hindu but don’t hate Muslims like u
kalki makers should consider this all points and make changes for kalki 2
Ab kya Changes karenge vo ? Shambala ko jaise unhone dikhaya hai usme ab badlaav kaise sambhav hain ?
@@PratikBorade ha vo to nhi badla ja skta
bhairva ko serious kr skte he, yaskin kon he , kalki avtar kese janm lega
director ko hi change kr kar do
@@PratikBorademaybe he’s afraid that his HODs won’t be able get work after if they fully commit to our dharm. Certain wood don’t mind suppressing Hindu glory
@@PratikBorade If they want they can easily do that by just showing that PB character is a avatar of Lord Kaal Bhairava and ashwathama got confused in faces as he thought that he is karna he us one who can use vijay and same goes for karna vs arjun where it is his pov not the actual truth. I don't think Shambhala is a problem as they designed it with combination of Hindu and Buddhist symbols also it is last location where god exist as god is banned in that world by Yaskin and Kali it is confirmed in a comicbook strip released in SDCC and in movie that people are getting killed worshipping god, production designer of kalki that yaskin trying to potray himself as good that's why if you closely see Yashin and Lord Krishna atrie is bit same. Movie is brilliant but karna arjun thing was a problem for me as well but I hope nagi gives good explanation for everything in part 2 and 3
Prashant Dhawan has explained difference between "AD" and "CE". Using "AD" means its Christian but using "CE" is bit secular. But still foolish Hindus watched it without knowledge.😂
Aapke dwara diya hua gyan itihas ke panno me darz Hoga
Aap mahtma hai
Aap kala ke guru hai
Aap mahagyani hai
Aap mahapurush hai
कल की फिल्म जब देख रहा था तब सब कुछ समाने देख रहा था पर आम लोगों को ये सब नहीं समझ आ रहा है
😂❤wah pratik bhao finally agaya detailed video meine toh aaasha hee chor diya.....chahliye der se toh der se aya toh sahi...now pratik bhao maharaja avesham ka video daaalenge yee hope karte h
मुझे महाभारत के विषय में इतना कोई ज्ञान नहीं मगर मुझे पहली बार यह पता चल रहा की कर्ण के प्रति सहानुभूति दिखाने का ये कारण भी हो सकता है....अब ऐसा महसूस कर रहा हूं कितनी स्वार्थी है ये दुनिया हर कोई अपने स्वार्थ का ही पक्षधर है चाहे वह वाम हो या दक्षिण आखिर सत्य क्या है? शायद कलयुग ही स्वयं में सत्य है🌔
Pratik Bhai, in the beginning of the movie, it was said that god was banned in Kaasi by Yaskin
watching bhairava is annoying from starting till end
While I was watching it in multiplex in Chennai most of the audience were irritated by Bhairava's cringe worthy introduction scene.
Karan Arjun ke charan ke dhul barabar bhi nahi hai, evil, viel, bad friend, adharmi hai Karan, danveer hone se koi acha nahi ho jata, Ravan bhi to shiv bhakt tha, to kya wo acha ban gaya?
Arjun maharathi hai, Pandu putr hai, Indra putr hai, krishna ke param mitr or bhakt hai, Pancho pandavo mein sabse mahan hai, Param krishna bhakt maharathi Arjun ki Jai.
Hare krishn hare krishn krishn krishn hare hare hare ram hare ram ram ram hare hare.
arrey bhai itna sach mat bol nahi toh sonyputra karna ke fans aa jayenge bhaukne.
@@ParthaPratim005 ek shlok atta nahi Mahabharata ka bolne se matlab hai unhe. Kintu mein nicha nahi dikha raha, unki bhi kya galti hai, sastro ko padhna to vilupt sa ho rakha hai. ye to dukh ka vishay hai ki is azzad bharat mein hamare itihas jaise ki ramayana or Mahabharata ko bus dekha jatta hai, padha nahi jatta, bahar ke desh jaise ki yunan ke log jo ub Christians hai phir bhi apne ancient Epics jaise ke illiad and Odyssey par garv karte hai.
@sewardquart9641wahi toh bhai Arjun jo swayam nara narayan ka avatar hai unhe compare karte hai ek adharmi se.
@@marvelfan7268 haan galat dikhaya hai. Wo log ek underdog character banane ke liye creative liberty liye the. Tv serial bure nahi hai par wo ache bhi nahi hai. Mahabharat Jan na hai to padhna padega, ajj tak ki sabse lambi Kahani hai mahabharat, Bible se 5 gunna jyada verses(shloka) hai usme, tv serials mein hamesha us time ki audience or government ke hisab se changes hote hai, Geeta press ki mahabharat padhiye bharata shri.
@@sewardquart9641thankyou bhaii time nikal ke jald hi pdhenge
Ek baar kisi video me Pratik borade ne hi BR chopda ke mahabharat ki prashnsa ki thi to BR chopda ka Mahabharat dekha tha aur Ramanand Sagar ki shree krishna v dekha usme v karn ko achha btaya gya hai
मुझे ट्रेलर देख के ही कुछ अंदाजा लग गया था तो मैंने फिल्म ही न देखी😬
Nikal andhbhakt samajhne ke liye National mind Hona chahie
Bhai mere movie bohot zyada achhi he jaake dekh
@@surrenderbohara2164 स्वघोषित बुद्धिमान महोदय आप के पिता जी की मूवी थी क्या जो तकलीफ हो गई मेरा मन मैं देखू न देखू मेरे कमेंट सेक्शन में आके अपने विशेष छिद्र में आनंद की अनुभूति करने आए होंगे कुछ भी हो आप लोग किसी भी तरह फील कर लेते है🤣
@@surrenderbohara2164नेशनल माइंड 😂 😂 2000 cross krva rhe the hui ki na 😂
Lucky you pratik bhai ne agar 7.5 star nai diye hote to main bhi kabhi nai dekhata ye bakwas propganda movie.
आजकल To the point movie से जैसे डर लगता है film makers को
इन्हे comedy , romance , songs जबरदस्ती चाहीए
मुझे तो यह फिल्म देखकर बहुत निराशा हुई थी।
Correctly analyzed Hindu hate in the movie is so apparent that the director hates Hindu culture so much.
Kaha dikha hindu hate mujhe bhi batao
🤡🤡🤡
@@bitu86twisting Mahabharata is anti-hindu
Phir bi andhe fans nhi samajge bhai you are way ahead of your times hope right wing will understand your importance
True 👍👍 Mukesh Khanna , on his TH-cam channel, also said about these problems in the movie .
Mukesh khana ne ye v kaha tha ki
Odisha or Bihar k log ye movie nahi samajh payenge.
Wow, yani indirectly odisha k logo ko murkh bol rahe hay.
Kya unhone odisha may bhagwan Sri jagannath ji k 5 mahan bhakt pancha sakha k dwara likhi gayi "Bhabiswa puran" or " malika" padhi hay.
Ye padhli hoti to odisha k log Kalki Avatar k uper kitna jante hay inko pata chal jata.
@@bapinakumarbarad9673 aap odisha se ho kya ?
I don't want to be disrespectful but he should not talk about mahabharat accuracy as br sir version is 40 to 50% wrong especially mahabharat katha
@@thannerulavanya4117 yes. You're right . BR CHOPRA also showed karna as quite good , I don't know why .
Ab mand buddhi valo ke pet mai jalan hone vali hai pratik sir ❤😂
Karna had no redeeming qualities in Mahabharata. He supports Duryodhana at every step in every decision. Only people who haven't even read a single shlok of Vyasa Mahabharata say Karna was a great character. You can't say you like Karna and then criticize Duryodhana because they were the same, hence their friendship bloomed so much.
Sir, is film mein problem hi problem hai. Main ek full time Kalki Bhakt hoon. Unke beej mantra aur stotra ke madhyam se unka awahan kar raha hoon. Jo facts Kalki maharaj ke baare mein Shreemad Bhagawatam Kalki puran aur bhavishya puran mein diye haan unme se ek ka bhi prayog is film mein nahi kiya gaya. Pehle toh ye date 2898 AD ghalat hai. Correct date 428989 AD hai. Kyunki Kalyug 432000 saal tak chalega aur abhi sirf 5500 saal hue hain kalyug ko shuru hoke.
Karn ko puri tarah se Villian kehna to galat hoga kyunki maa kunti ko unhone vachan dia tha akhir me ki we kisi bhi pandu putra ki hatya nahi karenge, ha Arjun k sath personal mamla tha!! (I'm not telling ki he was a good guy, but ha ye jarur he ki jivan me satya aur asatya ke bich bahut hi bada dharmsankat tha uske upar. Chahta tha ki duryodhan ka sath chodde lekin usne hi uski bahut badi madad ki thi islie shayad nahi chod paya)
Baki apne jo bhi baate kahi film ka plot kya ho sakta tha, i totally agree, Ashwatthama ka character agar apne kie gaye gunaho se bhairava ko dharm ka gyan deta to ye bahut samajne jesi bat hoti!
This didn't happened in Mahabharata ye tv serials me hi hai
Read Mahabharat book. Karn was adharmi and evil
Aap film ko criticise kar rahe hai toh log aapko gaali dete hai but agar koi goraa iss film ko review karte waqt criticise kartaa toh tab yehi ke log bolte ki foreigner sahi bol raha hai 😅.
Isliye India ek murkho ka desh hai ye main nahi ye Gore angrez log bolte hai sahi baat bhi hai India me murkh log zyada hai isliye unpad hai apni intelligence ka use karne ke bajay leftist woke logo ki baat me brainwash ho jaate hai ye dukh ki baat hai par ye harsh reality hai log sirf chatukar ban rahe hai
kalki is not ispired from mahabhartata instead it is a adaptation of urubhanga which is a markxist pov if mahabhabharata
But Marxist stupidity was not even created it is from 2 to 3 BC
@SumitMahato-fm6my yeah urubhanga is like a kadambari/play written by bhasa, basically it justifies all the actions taken by duryodhana, shakuni an karna. These 3 evil characters are being humanised these days by leftists, the laughter of panchali to duryodhana , the chariot of arjun being moved instead of Krishna by karna these all nonsense are just part of some poetry,play,kadambari only but actual Mahabharata of vedvyas never contains these shit.Anyways Arjun is way way ahead of evil karna. In every battle before kurukshetra arjun defeated karna without any help from Krishna like battle of Virat,battle with gandharvas etc..
Prashant Dhawan has explained difference between "AD" and "CE". Using "AD" means its Christian but using "CE" is bit secular. But still foolish Hindus watched it without knowledge.😂
@@RajeshSarkar-so3veWhat's the deal with the chariot being moved? Can you explain briefly?
Mahanati is a good movie.
The regressive aspect is there in every religion. So what do you want???? Dont show it, if it's a hindu family????
I must say, the selective targeting happens in movies. But, that does not mean anyone shows regressive hindu family is leftist.
Hindu bachchiyo ko chhod do.. unka Bhala kisme hai ye unke Mata-pita dekh lenge.. Nag Ashwin jaise kisi ko Humari bachchiyo ko Mata-pita ke viruddha bhadkane ki koi aavashyakta nahi hai..
Aur vaise bhi agar itne hi bade Liberal ho to yaha Jeher kyon ugal rahe ho aap ? Aapko to meri Abhivyakti ki Aazadi ka samman karna chahiye.. aap kyon meri aavaj dabana chahte hain ?
@@PratikBoradeI agree with you on every word yu spoke about kalki..
But ur above comment is I strongly disagree with that comment is reflection of ur deeply rooted regressive patriarchy mindset.. aur har kisi ke maa baap ache hi ho ye zaroori ni hai, koyi bi 100% right ni hota hai aur same way apne society me bi bohut khamiya hai n we need to address it n only thn we can improve
@@Avinashjha4247-p2s Here comes a bhagwa feminist. Lol. Maze ki baat toh yeh hai ki Hindu khud kab Marxist ban gaye leftist media aur academia ke influence mein unko pata hi nahi chala. Ghar pe Ram Ram Radhe Radhe japte hain aur bahar "regressive patriarchy" jaise subalternist (3rd wave Marxism) propaganda terminology use karte hain jaahil. Laanat hai.
आप जितना भी समझाए, आजकल ये युवा जो न महाभारत रामायण पढ़ते हैं और न ही उन्हें घंटनयों का कोई ज्ञान हैं या जानने की स्वदिच्छा हैं, वो इन कपोलकल्पित चित्रों को ही सच मानते हैं। कल्कि को अगर आप केवल एक छायाचित्र के अनुसार देखे तो ठीकठाक है मगर फ़िल्म एक मध्यम है जिस के द्वारा चित्रकार अपने सोच को जगत के समीप अभिव्यक्त करता है। अगर आप शुरू से गहन अध्ययन करे तो अश्वत्थामा का जैसे चित्रायन किया गया है वो ही गलत है। अश्वत्थामा ने भूपतित मुमूर्षु दुर्योधन को ये वचन देता है की वो पंच पांडव का सर काट कर लेके आएगा और इसी कारण से वो रात्रि में पांडव शिविर में जा के पहले धृष्टद्युम्न और शिखंडी का वध करता है और उसके उपरांत शायित पंच पांडव पुत्रों (द्रौपदी के पुत्रों) का वध करता है (अनजाने में)। पांडव नहीं थे तो वो पांडव पुत्रों का ही शिरोच्छेद करके दुर्योधन के पास लाता है और दुर्योधन समझ जाता है की अश्वत्थामा ने क्या पाप किया है। वो उसको कोसते हुए ही अपना प्राण त्याग देता है और अनुसोचना के कारण अश्वत्थामा मुनीवर महर्षि वेदव्यास के पास जाता है शरण मांगने। वहा पांडव श्री कृष्ण सहित आते हैं और तब अश्वत्थामा एक सूखे तृण को लेके ब्रह्मास्त्र का ध्यान करता है और पांडवों की और भेजता है। उसे रोकने के लिए अर्जुन भी श्री कृष्ण के आदेशानुसार ब्रह्मास्त्र चलता है और दोनो ब्रह्मास्त्र के संघर्ष से सृष्टि का विनाश रोकने के लिए वेदव्यास अपने तपोबल से अस्त्रों को रोकते है। अर्जुन को वापस लेने के लिए बोलने पर अर्जुन अस्त्र को वापस लेते है मगर अश्वथामा बोलता है उसे वापस लेना नहीं आता। अतः वो पांडवों का कुल नाश करने के लिए उसे उत्तरा के गर्भ में छोड़ता है और गर्भ में ही अभिमन्यु पुत्र का निधन हो जाता है। श्री कृष्ण तब उसके प्राण लौटाने का प्रण लेते है और अश्वत्थामा को अमरत्व का अभिशाप देते है और उसकी मणि भीमसेन उतार लेते है जिससे अश्वथामा की तेज लुप्त हो जाती है। श्री कृष्ण उत्तरा के पुत्र को पुनः जीवित करते है और जीवन मृत्यु की परीक्षा उत्तीर्ण करने के कारण उसका नाम परीक्षित पर ता है। फ़िल्म में कुछ भी नहीं दिखाया गया।
बेन हूर - आ टेल ऑफ क्राइस्ट जो विलियम वालेस की किताब है और १९४९ में विविध पुरस्कार विजेता एक फ़िल्म के रूप में विलियम वाइलर ने बनाया, उस में जीसस क्राइस्ट का चेहरा नहीं दिखाया गया। उसी का अनुकरण से यहां श्री कृष्ण का चेहरा नहीं दिखाया गया क्यों की निर्देशक नाग अश्विन उससे बोहुत प्रभावित थे (इंटरव्यू में उन्हों ने कहा था)।
अब अगर प्रभास की बात करे तो उसको एक ऐसी फ़िल्म चाहिए थी जो उसके डूबते करियर को पुनर्जीवित कर सके। वही काम इस फ़िल्म ने किया।
जब फ़िल्म का निर्देशक ही महाभारत को पढ़ा नहीं हो और मन में कम्युनिज्म और हलेलुया घूमता हो तो फ़िल्म भारतीय दृष्टिकोण से बनेगा कैसे? अध्यात्म गहन अध्ययन का विषय है और उस का चित्रायन करने के लिए विश्वास होना आवश्यक है। तबोबल, मंत्र शक्ति, अस्त्रशस्त्र - इनको समझ ने के लिए धैर्य और विश्वास चाहिए जो आधुनिक निर्देशकों में नहीं हैं। उनको अपनी संस्कृति पे गर्व ही नहीं हैं तो उनसे ये अपेक्षा करना की वो इन विशोयों को धागे में पिरो कर एक अद्भुत चित्र प्रस्तुत करेंगे ये कामना करना व्यर्थ है। जब की इन विषयों को अगर सठिक प्रस्तुत किया जाए तो अत्यंत सुंदर फ़िल्म बन सकता है। और कर्ण का चरित्र तो सालों से वामपंथियों के लिए एक प्रोपेगेंडा का माध्यम हैं क्यों की कर्ण को कभी भी एकदम सत्यानुसार प्रस्तुत नहीं किया गया। सूत कोई गाली है ही नहीं क्यों की सूतों का महाभारत में विशेष सम्मान के साथ वर्णन हैं। परंतु उसकी उपस्थापना सर्वदा एक वामपंथी प्रोपेगंडा के अनुसार ही होता आया हैं।
अब कर्ण को मुक्ति प्राप्त होने के बाद कहां से अचानक आ गया ये तो नाग अश्विन के मस्तिष्क में विराजमान नाग देवता भी नहीं जानते।
अतः कुछ आशा न रख के एकबार देख लो और भूल जाओ!
Support!!
I don't know what to say.....
I really waited for this film and I was also a bit disappointed when I first watch the movie ...maybe because I expected something more and still happy for the grand representation of short time Mahabharata scenes and reference.
But you are also right about the hidden ideology... I don't know what to say ... sometimes i became hopeless from all but still want to see the hindu epics on the grand scale..... let's see what they deliver in second part.
2:29 Deepika's performance wasn't bad. Prabhas was bad, yes!!
With due respect, she had no scope for acting. Only 2 expressions throughout.
@@lazydamsel Yes, I said she wasn't bad, but she isn't good enough also!!
Very eye opening and enlightening video Pratik Bhai!! Jay Shree Krishna!!🙏🙏
Same thing they showed in Hanuman too.. the lead character is very similar to Kalki's Bhairava
Namaste Prateek Ji ! It's really satisfying that you explained the philosophy in details.
Prateek Ji, aapke samajh aur aapke geheri Bharatiya Vichar ko koti koti Pranam 🙏🙏 !! 🚩
Vande Mataram !!
भैया जब मैंने अंतिम में देखा की प्रभास का कैरेक्टर कर्ण है , और उसे जिस तरह से दिखाया गया , मुझे बहुत निराशा हुई की एक विलन को हीरो के रूप में दिखाया जा रहा है
Kiska podcast h for karna??? What name you said?
Ami ganatra
Ye leftist log negativity se is kadar pyaar krte hai inhe agar gulaab ka phool bhi doge na tab bhi inka dhyaan uske kaanto prr hi jayega.
Naag Aswin is current generation vyda vaas or valmiki. He is very good narrator on Hinduism. If you don't believe watch his first movie on yevade subramaniam on Himalayas trekking.
😂😂😂 Aryans should not have taught you southies Hinduism
किसी और रिलीजन को लेकर तुमने ऐसे ही तुलना कर दी होती तो अब तक वह तुम्हारी गर्दन उड़ा चुका होता😡😡😡😡
नाग अश्विन की तुलना तुम वेदव्यास से कर रहे हो, चलो मैं तुम्हारे पापा की तुलना शिन-चैन और डोरेमोन से कर देता हूं चलेगा???
Nag Aahwin is Valmiki??? 😂 Lol. Stop insulting Valmiki Rishi and Ved vyas
Karn papi thaa usne dropdi ko veshya kaha uska aapmaan kiya
Abhimanu ko tadpa tadpa krr mara
Duryodhan jaise papi ka sath diya
Itna late video... Aur ek bat nhi bataye nag ashvin director ki vichardhara vampanthi hindu virodhi hai
Prashant Dhawan has explained difference between "AD" and "CE". Using "AD" means its Christian but using "CE" is bit secular. But still foolish Hindus watched it without knowledge.😂
Pratik bhai.... Telugu movies have a long tradition of showing Karna as an anti-hero and not a villain. This is not based on Leftist leaning but on an old telugu version of Mahabharat written around 500 years ago.
All telugu films showing Karna use this version of Mahabharat as a reference point. Its nothing to do with leftist ideology that came out in the 20th century.
Regarding how Ashwathama influences the Prabhas character, maybe more details will be there in the sequel. Where was the time for all that in the first part.
Here the story is about how to protect Sum80 and help birth of Kalki. They just cannot show Prabhas in tapasya for many years to gain all powers and knowledge. It wont make sense.
Jab Convent school me padh ke bade honge to vo bacche hamare itihas ko mythology aur bible ke idea and view se hi movie banayenge
Miriyam is waiting for KALKI, 10th of avatar of lord Vishnu, that should be problem to ANTI SANATHANIS
Thanks a lot for this video Sir. Huge fan. Love you.
19:40 what is second coming
Christianity me mana jata hai ki Jesus dobara prithvi par aayenge, ise Second coming kaha jata hai.. Google par aap jankari prapt kar sakte hai..
Sanatan Sanskriti me Massiaha/Prophet jaisa koi concept nahi hai.. director ko apni Mahaan Secular soch apne pas hi rakhni chahiye !
@@PratikBorade thanks for replies 😍🥰❤ and nice explain 😊
Indian movies are suffering from substandard or mediocrity at best. Chaprigriri is prioritized in the name of appealing to mass but in actual people in the industry (except few) are incompetent and less intelligent to make high quality films.
बढ़िया review pratik borade bhai
आजकल के reviewer को शास्त्रों, स्मृतियों व पुराणों का घंटा पता नहीं है इसलिए ऊनको कुछ पता नहीं चलता ऐसे फिल्मों के बारे में।
जिनको ज्ञान है ऊनको पता है करण धुरयोधन के बाद सबसे बड़ा Negativity or villain character था महाभारत में
Bahat dino se vlog upload nhi Kiya Gargi ko dikhao partik bhai....❤love to see your Vlog video
Ab main kasam khata hun bina aapki review dekhe kisi movie ko nahi dekhunga
@@LoveSharma-e9c 8 sal se Ad ka kam kar raha hun , to mujhe mat sikha kya achha hai kya bura
या लोकांच्या बेसिक मध्येच खुप मोठा प्रोब्लेम आहे.. किती ही डोकं फोडल तरी हे लोक सुधरायला तयार नाही.
👍🏻 कर्ण को मोक्ष नहीं मिला जो बार बार जन्म ले रहा हैं 😂
@HimanshuSaklani-d2o phir bhe 2% ka bhe sense nahi h ☑️ .. punarjanm ya bar-bar janam kin logo ka hota h . Sanatan k anusaar moksh kya h ?
@HimanshuSaklani-d2o सनातन के अनुसार मोक्ष मिलने पर आत्मा से परमात्मा का मिलन होता है, फिर जीवन मरण का खेल वही रुक जाता है ☑️ तुम्हारे गीता में लिखा है, देख लो
@@HimanshuSaklani-d2o तुम्हारे सत्य सनातन के अनुसार, परमात्मा का अर्थ ईश्वर से है
Pratik Bhai Should start a podcast and should invite all directors and film makers who spread propaganda and are secular ! I'm really excited if it's happening !
Movies and directors like these are destroying our youth and the sad part is ke MATA PITA in sab pe dhyan nahi dete. Chalo puri mahabharat nahi padha sakte, atleast ye toh btao ke kon achcha and kon bura hai. Jai Shri Krishan
Pratik Bhai telugu me karna ka movie hai..which is like Bible to karna mastrubators..name is DANA VEERA SURA KARNA.. IN Which script was written by telugu DRAVIDIAN VAADI.. NTR SIR DONE IT TO promote south politics like Tamil karnan movie ..for his political benefits .voh movie dekho aap ka pura jawaab milega...
Not exactly, Karna's role was elevated from the translations of Vyasa Bharatha in all regional versions since 11th century medival times
😂😂 NTR is Dravidian vadi😂😂….what a joke just look at his political costume…he has Rudraksha with orange dress(later Thackeray copied NTR Dress look)….even Vajpayee used to behave like secular and NTR is the one who created first BJP govt in centre…
@@nationalist7347 script writer is not sr.ntr.. he collaborated with a hardcore Dravidians then ..who wrote dramas. Of that sort...in telugu .. to promote regionalism ntr collabed with those forces for political gain
@@theexplorers452😂😂 just go and check credits it is written directed and even produced by NTR himself and he even played Arjuna karna Krishna on the same movie😂😂….just check first…if u bully guys like Ashwin no one will produce a Hindu movie and go to do rom com…because if guys like you even Rajamouli is afraid to make Mahabharat ….bcoz u idiots and leftist both will bully him
Bhai sahab ye kalyug ant dwapar yug jesa nhi hoga is yug me scientific yudh hoga
Sabse pehle bounty hunter bhairava ko karna ka avatar bataya hai yahi cheez karna ka apmaan hai
मुझे पहले ही doubt था, इसलिए में देखने नहीं गया; क्यूंकि पूरी Liberal Gang (Nagshwin, Dipika, Kamal Hasan etc.) इस film में included है और में अपने पैसे Sickular Gang को नहीं दूँगा I
Watch kalki it's great movie
I really loved it don't listen to others. Mahabharata, which doesn't have same story, have different thinkings.
@@DailyNewsNepal-kw2yo
All versions of Mahabharat are similar in all of them Karna has been shown evil
From Bori CE, KGM, C Rajgopalachari, Penguin Publication, Ramesh Menon, Gita Press all of them even some foreign authors as well BUT I don't remember their names
Kalki is bad it is not based on Mahabharat
@@DailyNewsNepal-kw2yo No thanks, I don't want to waste my money on Anti-Hindu Propaganda
@@itsentertainment5166 how can you say Karna is evil ? Please do research properly
@@DailyNewsNepal-kw2yo I mentioned the name of all Mahabharat just search on google like this Mahabharat pdf Internet archive
You will get access and read yourself
Read all the versions of Mahabharat unabridged translation
And Geeta Press Hindi as well
You will get to know why I called him so(evil).
Pratik bhai aapka review mujhe youtube pe sabse honest aur perfect lgta hai
Jai shree ram🙏🏻 jai hind 🇮🇳
I don't think Nag Ashwin would have thought this deeply when writing the story...
Galat, usne bahut deeply socha hai.. filmmakers murkh nahi hote.. soch samajh kar Yaskin ko Bhagwan Krishna ka Negative roop dikhaya hai.. iske bare me ek video bhi hai TH-cam par Kalki ke production designer ka..
@@PratikBorade Bhai please don't watch movies which so problematic to your mental health. Just live your life happy.🙂
10:49 बिल्कुल सही बात है भूत कमीनी है यार यह डायरेक्टर हिंदुओं के दुश्मन है और लोग नहीं समझ नहीं रहे😢😮
@@gautamkiran559tum chinta mat karo pratik borade Bhai ko kuch nahi hoga vo thik uska mental health bhi sahi hai tum sirf leftist woke se dur raho unke brainwash hone se bacho
Akhanda is best south indian superhero inspired from a gyat aghori
Har harMahadev 🕉️ 🕉️ 🕉️
It is actually not but ok its ur opinion
@@wrider3728 what's actually not
Jay Shree Ram Pratik Bhai! Sach bolu to bachpan me jab school ke pathyapustako me aur kahi saari idhar udhar ki kahaani ke kaaran main kaafi brain wash ho gaya tha aur Karna ko hi sabse positive character maanne laga tha aur bahoot saare alag alag tv shows me karna ka mahima mandan shuru kar diya gaya aur arjun ko thoda grey shade dene lage wampanthi producers aur main kaafi had tak brainwash ho chuka tha. Fir dhire dhire aapke channel ke madhyam se aur Ami Ganatra Ji ke bahoot saare videos dekhe aur meri aankhe khul gayi aur sahi itihaas ko jaanne ko prerit hua aur bodh hua ki karna ek negative character tha jisse wampanthio ne itihaas badal kar hero bana diya. Aur Mahabharat ke main hero Arjun hi the. Ab yeh Kalki ke makers bhi Karna ka Mahimamandan karne me lage hue hai. Telugu filmmakers se yeh bilkul expect nahin kiya gaya tha his telugu film industry ne humar purano se judi bahoor saari filme banayi hai bina kisi ched chad kiye. Aur Bharat ki tamam film industries me sabse zyada apne roots se aur sanskriti se judi koi film industry hai to woh keval Telugu industry hi hai. Yeh bahoot dukh ki baat hai ki telugu industry me wokism ka virus dheere dheere ghoosne laga hai. Shyam Singharoy bhi ek bahoot hi ghinoni film thi jisse bollywood ke elite critics ne bhi gungaan gaaye the. Yeh sach me bahoot chinta ka vishay hai. Bhagwan Shree Krishna ne kabhi bhi Ashwatthama ko yeh nahin kaha tha ki tum mere dasme avatar ko bachaoge aur prayashcheet karoge. Yeh sab makers ne apne man ka kachra daal diya aur jab Mukesh Khanna ne is baat ke liye film ka virdodh kiya to unhe saare youtube ke samosa critics nochne lage aur roast karne waale videos banane lage. Yahi dikhaata hai in sab ki ghinoni mansikta. Jay Shree Krishna. 🙏🙏
प्रतीक भाऊ, अगर हम इसी प्रकार हर एक फ़िल्म में कमियाँ निकालने का प्रयास करते रहेंगे तो आगे लोग भी विमुख हो जायेंगे. मैं समझ सकता हूँ कि ये फ़िल्म पूर्णरूप से हमारे ग्रंथों और धर्म के साथ न्याय नहीं करती, परंतु क्या ये आदिपुरुष की तरह अपमान करती है? अगर नहीं तो हमें इतनी घनिष्ठ निंदा से बचना चाहिए. आपके विचारों से मैं पूर्णतः सहमत हूँ परंतु इतनी जल्दी इतने विलक्षण बदलावों की अपेक्षा नहीं करनी चाहिये.
"NAAG ASWIN" IS A NAAG 🐍,IT PROVED 😂 CRINGE MOVIE THAA "KALKI 2898" ,PAR KYA KRE KOI OTHER OPTION HIN NAHIN HAI
These people knowingly create such probl€ms. Don't tell me they dont have enough funds to consult indic scholars, etc. They want to portray wrong stories.
Biggest blockbuster Kalki2898AD 1100cr worldwide 🥵🔥😎💥💥
With 600 cr budget
@@itsentertainment51661150 core collection dekh ke hater 😂😂😂
movie wasn’t great
Aaj dekh ke complete kiye santaan dharm ko acha nhi dikhaya....
16:05 yeh toh aisa hua ki motu patlu wale Motu ko samosa khaane se shakti aati hai
महान दिव्य आत्मा के श्रेष्ठ विश्लेषण कि प्रशंसा करते हैं।
Without promotion Kalki collected 1000 crores+ even have mixed reviews this is something Prabhas stardom matters....but if any of his film is really good and liked by everyone then may be collection would be something else which cannot expect😅
Bhai pandav ne bhi aapani patni ko dav me. Lagaya tha to vo dharmaraj kaise . Padhav ki Vijay isliye Hui kyu ki bhagwan shri krishna sath the .
Bhagwan sri krishna sath the par kyon sath the ye nahi pata hai tumhe?
Bhai tu pogo tv ko criticise kiya kr...
Kahe bey dalla
@@Optimum_Prime haan bilkul q nhi bhai😁 mein khelta hun 😂
Aur tu pogo dekha kar
@@dataseeker2211 yep still i like to watch pogo whats wrong with it 😂
Tu jakar pogo dekh. Teri utni iq level nahi hai ki tu kalki ki bare me jane.😂😂😂
Sach bataau toh movie dekhne mein accha toh lagtaa hai graphics action visuals etc but mereko yeh ek sastaa madmax movie lagaa aur Messiahvaad ko promote karne waala movie zyada lagaa.
Hindu dharm messiahvaad ko promote kabhi bhi nahi kiye hain. Jab bhagwaan kalki janm bhi lenge toh kisiko bhi pataa nahi chalegaa ki unhone janm kab liyaa.
Jab bhagwaan Ram aur bhagwaan Krishna neh bhi janm kiyaa tha tab bhi koi yeh nahi jaantaa tha ki woh bhagwaan hain. Jab valmiki ji neh ramayan likhaa aur vedvyas ji neh Mahabharat tab logo ko pataa chalaa.
Overall movie aisaa nahi hain ki pasand nahi aayegaa par agar movie ko madmax jaisaa hi banaana tha toh bhagwaan kalki ka concept nahi lete, aur agar liye toh post apocalyptic world aur messiahvaad promote karne ki kya zarurat thi. Upar seh karn ko hero dikhaa rahe hain😅😅, ashwathama khud karn ko hate karte thain.Karn asal mein homelander ka baap tha(in nature) usko yeh vaampanthi log promote karte hain par bhagwaan Krishna ko galat portray karenge jabki sabse zyada dard unhone hi apne life mein jhelaa par woh villian nahi bane.
Agar main kalki movie banaata toh main batman tone ka theme ka movie banaataa.
Har Har Mahadev pratik ji 🔱🙏🏻
જય શ્રી કૃષ્ણ મોટાભાઇ 🙏
Aapko bahut bahut dhanyawad pratik bhai... aapne mere mann ki baat kahi hai...jai shree ram..🙏🙏🙏🚩
That's why I didn't watch it in theatres.. There is something wrong with Prabhas I guess
Ye log le deke karn ko shrest batayenge
Inko arjun ki shrestata se problem hai
Even for me the Kalki 2898 AD was an absolute torture. This weekend I watched 2 movies "The UP Files" and Marathi movie "Gharat Ganapati (घरत गणपति).
Honestly, The UP Files disappointed me a lot. It was very poor presentation and technically very weak. Yogi ji is a person to be taken very seriously and presented properly.
Rather घरत गणपति is superb movie. Great photography, technically well made, nice music and most important is the importance of preserving our "Family System (कुटुंब व्यवस्था)".
Dhanyawad Bhai 🙏
The UP Files to Trailer se hi B Grade lag rahi thi.. baki Gharat Ganpati mujhe bhi dekhni hai, uska bhi Review avashya karunga..
@@PratikBoradeखूप छान, घरत गणपति तुम्हाला आवडेल.
Very well explained. Thank you for this video ❤️
Last me Yaskin ( kali ) *"jaganath ke rath ka chakra "* dialogue ka kya sense tha use bhagwan vishnu se compare kiya hai
Edit - Kalki production designer Nitin Chaudhary ne khud ye confirm Kiya hai ki Yaskin ko Negative shade of Krishna dikhana
Bhai uske andar Jo sirum he vo bhagnvan kalki ka ansh hi he isliye Aisa he
@@anime-station1898 no bro dialogue writer of kalki told that the meaning of that is yaskin is going to kill sum 80 and Kalki
@@thannerulavanya4117 Nahi *Kalki* ke production designer ne ye khud confirm kar diya ki last scene ka idea tha Yaskin ko negative shade of Krishna dikhana he also said we can see similarities between them
Bhai tumko much nahi patha..aur vo dialogue telugu me bolne se acha hota he....isme bola tha ki jagannath ratha chakralu vasthunnay vasthunnay...means deepika is the rath and she is coming with sri krishna....said dialogue writer himself....and that production designer explanation is yaskin is not sri Krishna in -ve shade it is yaskin is complete opposite of sri krishna iska matlab he sri krishna ke guna se complete opposite he....@@anime-station1898
@@anime-station1898 Bro I say the whole interview and production designer didn't anything like that instead he said he see yaskin as a fallen god and atire similarity between Lord Krishna and Yaskin from pretty clear as in the they both were white clothes so that he can show himself as god or king and the dialogue things told previously. I think Lord Krishna evil side was used for click bait but if they showing yaskin and Lord Krishna same then can you give the time stamp if it is true then also adds to my problems kalki
Shows two Hindus Sadhus just for 2-3 seconds during showing Shambhala
Mein bhi aa gaya jaan ne ke liye....👍👍👍👍👍jai shree ram 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
"जय श्रीराम" प्रतीक भाई। आप 100 प्रतिशत सही हैं। प्राचीन समय में यदि राजा को मारने की आवश्यकता होती है, तो विरोधी उसके स्वादिष्ट भोजन में जहर मिलाते हैं। फिल्म निर्माता यही कर रहे हैं। महर्षि व्यास ने आने वाली पीढ़ियों को धर्म का पालन करने के लिए मार्गदर्शन करने के लिए महाभारत लिखी है। भगवान कृष्ण और अर्जुन इस महाकाव्य के मुख्य केंद्र बिंदु हैं। और महाभारत में भगवद्गीता सबसे मूल्यवान गहना। वे फिल्म के किसी भी दृश्य में आसानी से "यदा यदा ही धर्मस्य" श्लोक लगा सकते थे लेकिन उन्होंने सभी स्थानों पर पूरी तरह से पश्चिमी संगीत का उपयोग किया। सबसे बुरी बात यह है कि वे आखिरी दृश्य में अर्जुन को बुरे अभिमानी के रूप में कैसे पेश करते हैं। दूसरी ओर उन्होंने कर्ण का वीरतापूर्ण प्रवेश दिखाया। सिनेमाघरों में लोग तालियां बजा रहे हैं और मैं सोच रहा हूं कि लोगों को क्या हो गया है? कि मुझे यकीन हो गया कि निर्देशक का शुद्ध इरादा नहीं है। इसके अलावा विलन ने गांडीव धनुष को उठाया, वे आगामी फिल्म में कुछ और बदतर दिखा सकते हैं।
Support our Channel -
UPI id - pratik.pratik.om@okaxis
Patreon - www.patreon.com/PratikBorade
Paypal - paypal.me/PratikBoradeIN
It's an era of Kali that's why our generation believes the Asura karna is a good character and the Arjuna is a weak warrior.
Pratik bhai aapke jaisa you tuber ya reviewers ko nhi aap mahaan ho bhai
Aapko communist log dabane ki koshish bahut karenge darane ki koshish bhi karenge but aap pichhe mat hatna
Mahadev ka Ashirwad sadaiv hi bana rahe aap par or aapke pure pariwar par
Jai Shree Ram 🙏🚩🚩🚩
I was of the opinion director was targeting western and Christian audience all over the world and gave him benefit of doubt until you mentioned about his secularism in Mahanati. The ultimate litmus test to find if he is a secular or crypto or Dharmic person is to see if he promotes Karma and Moksha or true believers and hell and heaven
I think he is trying to show Karma cycle where grey to black characters Mahabharat are getting a chance for redemption
Prashant Dhawan has explained difference between "AD" and "CE". Using "AD" means its Christian but using "CE" is bit secular. But still foolish Hindus watched it without knowledge.😂
Aapne abhi tak maharaja ka review kyu nhi kiya
Good catch. I agree with your assessments
wo shiv bhakt bhi nahi tha Valmiki Ramayan medin kahin mentioned nahi hai ki wo Shiv ji ka bhakt hoga
mujhe agr pta hota ki director kuchh jyada hi secular he to syd me nhi dekhta ye movie
Meh dekha nahi hai aur dusro ko bhi mana Kiya
😂😂 I mean his own production house Vyjayanti movies logo is Lord krishna😂😂….So if he is so called secular than I can’t repair your Brian
@@nationalist7347 Karan Johar ke production house ka naam bhi Dharma Productions hai to kya wo Sanatan Dharm ke vicharon par chalne wala aur Dharmic traditions aur ideology ko badhane wala thodi na ho gaya ....
Hai to wo bhi secular ka baap aur Liberals ka pyaara 😐
Prashant Dhawan has explained difference between "AD" and "CE". Using "AD" means its Christian but using "CE" is bit secular. But still foolish Hindus watched it without knowledge.😂😂
Kya ho gya
8:30 what is curious is not only Hindu Rishi has not been shown by the director , I have not seen a Islamic mullah too. May be we should thank him for that as Islam completely denies any avatar or rebirth concept.
Pure Shambala ko Mariam control karti hai bhai..
@@PratikBoradePratik Bhai.. this forced secularization of leading characters with Christian names is a serious problem.
Shayad sabhi panth ko acceptance mey laane ke liye mool katha ko hee badalna galat hai..
The least I hope is in sequel the so called Karna is shown repenting for the choices he made during dwapar yuga and remorse by taking corrective actions in this punarjanm as bhairava.. otherwise it utter waste of opportunity other than some decently done special effects and battle sequences.
The cowardice or timidity to show complete Hindu ethos by Hindu directors (Telugu directors are most Hindu remember no Tamil or Kerala director even goes this far as it’s too Hindu for them) is a problem and we have our own shackles to break out of this forced secularization mould.
Love to see your comment on this Pratik bhai..
@@PratikBorade😂😂 may be she got ghar wapsi😂…just change your perspective…
@@PratikBorademariam is actually a god in south
10:49 बिल्कुल सही बात है भूत कमीनी है यार यह डायरेक्टर हिंदुओं के दुश्मन है और लोग नहीं समझ नहीं रहे😢😮
Excellent video brother. Each and every point is backed with facts. highly recommend this to everyone who is a Hindu.
I was waiting for your review since I watched first day…
Agree with all of your analysis
Really appreciate your efforts
Jai shree Ram 😇🙏🏻
Jab janta kisi movie ko accept krti hai tb review aur criticism se kuchh nhi hota, waise Aapko toh bahubali, rrr story wise aur cinematic experience ke kaaran pasand nhi aayi thi, usme jo hamare hindu culture ko acche tarike se dikhaya gya tha isilye wo movie apko pasand ayi nhi toh bahubali aur rrr bhi apko pasand nhi aata. Aap toh hanuman ki movie ko bhi negative review diya tha.
Toh kalki toh chhor hi do.
Aap extremist ho, aur jb tk extremist ka bhoot apke upar sawaar hai tab tak aap movies ko enjoy nhi kr pavoge.
janta movies dekh kr influence nhi hoti kisi ke paas itna time nhi hai, aap har ek movie mein khod khod ke hindutva nikalne ka koshish karte ho.
Mera aapke liye 2 suggestion hai.
1) ya toh ye youtube channel band krke hindutva ka jhanda lekar niklo aur sabhi hinduo ko jaagrook karo.
2) ya ek achhe se psychiatrist ko dikhao khud ko.
Pehla toh aap se hoga nhi, dusra hi better hai aapke liye.
Isko to animals movie aacha lga tha 😂😂😂
@@Bharat-vq9uxanimal is masterpiece movie tujhe animal se itni problem hai to mat dekhna animal park tu khun ki ulti karega sooryavansham movie ke thakur bhanu pratap ki tarah 😂😂😂😂 animal is better than omg2 lapataa ladies and mirzapur series is bullshit hai 😂😂😂😂😂
@@Bharat-vq9uxAnimal is not Hinduphobic but Kalki is
@@wickeddemon8799 Kalki bhi Hinduphobic Nahi Hai aur Shyam Singha Roy bhi Hinduphobic Nahi hai.... Ye Pratik pagla gaya hai....
@@050138 Both are
Sahi mein....itne problematic themes ko badhava har jgah milta ja ra hai...aur log unhi themes ko pasand kr re hai....hum Hindus aaj itne divided hai aur itne influenced hai in leftist marxist propaganda se ki bohot dukh hota hai. Especially youth aur UPSC students mein.
Ho sakta hai yahan Kamal Hasan ko bhi pakhand dikhane wale hen..ap kyun itni jaldi judgemental ho rahe ho 😂 I am referring to your Ravan wala analogy.