Ma'am your lectures are too helpful to understand these philosophy... The way you explanation the concepts, I can easily understand the depth of the theory.
Fantastic explanation. I have been reading the Utilitarianism principles and wasn't understanding them very well. Thanks for helping me understand better.
Wow 👌🏼 I have no words For You 👍🏼🙌🏼 I am Poltical science and international relations student and this is one of Course that we are taking now perfect explanation with understanding words 👏🏼 👌🏼
I’m so glad you mentioned the fact that he had himself taxidermied. In my opinion any discussion of Bentham is incomplete without talking about that just a little.
At this stage the word philosophy and autism might as well be synonyms. How anyone can pick Bentham out as uniquely having Asperger syndrome is wild to me.
how does this world view deals with exceptions like sadists ho derive pleasure from suffering and secondly how can we say that it is wrong for them to harm others when it's subjective ?
As somebody with Asperger's I can assure you we most certainly do not suffer. If anything, we thrive. We tend to over excel. It's definitely not a "suffering" - in fact, I dare say the only suffering we do is suffering the NT fools who surround us! 🤣🤣🤣
There are contradictions in Beńthams theory on utilitarianism in so much as he proposes that the individual is as important as the masses. so far as utilitarianism in effect in Mayan times would through their belief system that sacrifice of individuals meant the greater masses would prosper. There is a moral argument therefore against utilitarianism would you not think?
Well, that depends on the definition of the moral in argument. In utilitarianism, morality is defined by the overall result of an action. So if an action results in more good than bad, utilitarianism considers it good.
@@CriminologyWeb thanks for the reply CW but ethically or morally I personally would rather take my chances against the will of the Gods rather than violently, or otherwise take the life of a human being no matter how strong the argument is! 🤔🙄😖
The "criticism" presented against Utilitarianism in this video is logically flawed for it didn't really explain the problem with Utilitarianism. What was presented was a case of ad hominem. It is likely that Utilitarianism has a flaw, but the point raised in this video was talking more about the presenter of the proposition (Jeremy Bentham), rather than the proposition itself (Utilitarianism).
hi Margit this is my first time in your youtube channel and i had visited your channel .you are looking very beautiful and your phd is awesome as you have wrote in your description any one can ask question to you . my question is religion question .i am muslim but i am not follow blindly religions but i believe one god .we muslim call it name allah .allah is islamic name of god .can i ask you a religion question it will based just for knowledge .by the my english is not well but i am doing practicing by youtube stream .i hope you will understand it .
Big flaw in this philosophy is happiness could be subjective. If a society claims that slaughtering 6 million jews makes them feel happier, who's to say that society is wrong then?
Only for the minority. Also tyranny is a strong word. If the majoriti were as consise as you said they would surely have enough compassion for the few that do not completely agree
A fairly good video until the totally ignorant statement; 'Bentham was essentially an armchair philosopher' With great respect you need to read up on Bentham, his interests were entirely practical. He was responsible for a huge amount of social reform, was the moving force behind much legal reform, helped set up the UK's first police force, was one of founders of University College London, an antislavery campaigner etc, etc. He was not really a philosopher at all; he was only interested in practical results, this is absolutely clear in both his life and and writings. Why did you spoil an otherwise good video with such uninformed stupidity.
Fantastic explanation. I have been reading the Utilitarianism principles and wasn't understanding them very well. Thanks for helping me understand better.
Ma'am your lectures are too helpful to understand these philosophy...
The way you explanation the concepts, I can easily understand the depth of the theory.
Thanks for your comment, Jaishree, I'm glad I could help.
Now I shall go find and picture of him displayed in the college. thank you. This was very informative
You truely are a gem, thank you so much for your efforts, they are very much appreciated.
You're very welcome, Nada. Glad you're finding it helpful.
Fantastic explanation. I have been reading the Utilitarianism principles and wasn't understanding them very well. Thanks for helping me understand better.
I couldn't start my report because of so many readings to do. This video explained really well, thanks!
Glad it helped
Thank you for this, I share this video with my students in my introduction to philosophy class to help them get a better grasp of the text.
Wow 👌🏼 I have no words For You 👍🏼🙌🏼 I am Poltical science and international relations student and this is one of Course that we are taking now perfect explanation with understanding words 👏🏼 👌🏼
Happy to hear, Loura!
You're one of my best teachers
Love from Pakistan 🇵🇰🇵🇰🇵🇰
Thanks for explaining big topics like this in so clear manner.
Glad to hear, Sovit
I’m so glad you mentioned the fact that he had himself taxidermied. In my opinion any discussion of Bentham is incomplete without talking about that just a little.
mam you are making the concept lucid . mam you are absolutely a genius !!!!
Thanks, Jay :)
You are a great teacher ❤
Thank you. You explained Bentham's idea very clear and well.
Glad it was helpful Laura
Today's my criminology exam.
Your vids really helping me out. Thanks
Awesome, Parosh. Hope it went well.
Excellent summary...thanks for posting
Thank you! This was very informative and easy to understand!
You're welcome, Mario. Glad to hear that.
Easy for everyone from different backgrounds to understand. Job done excellently. ✔ 👍🙃
Thank you very much for sharing. This was well explained and I have learnt a lot.
Thanks, Mulando, happy to hear it.
Thank you so much, ma'am for ur clear explanation. You really help us alot
thank you, love your delivery
Glad to hear that
Thank you for such an elucid explanation in a clear accent ❤❤ make more informative content
Thank you so much for the video, it's so helpful
Shortly but perfect ❤
The way of explaining is very nice. 👍🏻👍🏻
Myself from _ India _ Maharashtra Mumbai _ Nashik..
you did a wonderful job thank you for the information
You're welcome, Giselle
Amazing explanation.
Thnk q mam fr yr explanation i got more idea in yr word .......🤔
Thank you 😊 💓
Just one word.. sweeeeet….❤️
That's really great price of work. Thank you.
Thanks, Seewali
Gratitude from India📍
Thanks, Anaz
Thank you. I find this very helpful.
Glad it was helpful
Thanks a lot ma’am
I have an exam in an hour and this helped a lot 😅
Hope it went well!
Good accent I understand each single word😅, thanks ☺️
Haha, yes accent can't be helped
Voice is a clear as rain water😊
Thanks for the nice words, Nani
Mam Thanku So Much
It is Really Helpful. Voice From #Kashmir
Happy to help, Asif!
Where can I get lectures on utilitarianism, please tell me ?? Thank you for explaining utilitarianism in short in this video. 🌸
Great video, thank you very much , note to self(nts) watched all in it 6:05
Thank you
You're welcome, Constanta
thank you!!
Glad it helped!
thanks you
it means a lot to me 🙏🙏🙏
tomorrow exam🥺🥺🥺🥺
Hope your exam went well!
@@CriminologyWeb yeah mam I wrote well in the exam
thanks a lot🙂😊😊
Can someone explain what's the relationship between criminology and a philosophy like utilitarianism?
Is that just the name of the channel?
You have nailed it mam
Awesome, happy to hear
At this stage the word philosophy and autism might as well be synonyms.
How anyone can pick Bentham out as uniquely having Asperger syndrome is wild to me.
Lots of thanks😊😊 from kashmir
Best wishes to Kashmir :)
@@CriminologyWeb ... Tysm 😊
It really helps this explanation but i m hear because tomorrow is my exam
Excellent explanation 😍
Glad you liked it
what is the time frame to be used when one must judge if an act is right or wrong?
Nice one! This is a good video
Thanks :)
Its useful ...thank u
Glad to hear it, Sunish
Thank you ma'am 💕
Most welcome 😊
very nice way for teaching mam
Thanks, Mohan
Mam I want ur contact or mail please
Thank you ☺️ madm
Welcome 😊
Did bentham support lassiez faire?
Good class mam
Glad to hear Midhun
Thanks 😊
Welcome 😊
how does this world view deals with exceptions like sadists ho derive pleasure from suffering
and secondly how can we say that it is wrong for them to harm others when it's subjective ?
He also used black magic with john dee alchemist black magic. Then became an alice Bailey project
Thnk q mam🤗
As somebody with Asperger's I can assure you we most certainly do not suffer. If anything, we thrive. We tend to over excel. It's definitely not a "suffering" - in fact, I dare say the only suffering we do is suffering the NT fools who surround us! 🤣🤣🤣
Thanku mam
You're welcome, Sheikh
There are contradictions in Beńthams theory on utilitarianism in so much as he proposes that the individual is as important as the masses. so far as utilitarianism in effect in Mayan times would through their belief system that sacrifice of individuals meant the greater masses would prosper. There is a moral argument therefore against utilitarianism would you not think?
Well, that depends on the definition of the moral in argument. In utilitarianism, morality is defined by the overall result of an action. So if an action results in more good than bad, utilitarianism considers it good.
@@CriminologyWeb thanks for the reply CW but ethically or morally I personally would rather take my chances against the will of the Gods rather than violently, or otherwise take the life of a human being no matter how strong the argument is! 🤔🙄😖
@PeterWalsh Of course, couldn't agree more.
Then there are a few of us left, brother! 🤔😌
Thanks mam
You're welcome, Pravin! Glad I could help.
The "criticism" presented against Utilitarianism in this video is logically flawed for it didn't really explain the problem with Utilitarianism. What was presented was a case of ad hominem. It is likely that Utilitarianism has a flaw, but the point raised in this video was talking more about the presenter of the proposition (Jeremy Bentham), rather than the proposition itself (Utilitarianism).
hi Margit this is my first time in your youtube channel and i had visited your channel .you are looking very beautiful and your phd is awesome as you have wrote in your description any one can ask question to you . my question is religion question .i am muslim but i am not follow blindly religions but i believe one god .we muslim call it name allah .allah is islamic name of god .can i ask you a religion question it will based just for knowledge .by the my english is not well but i am doing practicing by youtube stream .i hope you will understand it .
Nyz
BENTHAN WAS RIGHT .
No
Big flaw in this philosophy is happiness could be subjective. If a society claims that slaughtering 6 million jews makes them feel happier, who's to say that society is wrong then?
Fiat justitia ruat caelum
Utilitarianism leads to tyranny of the majority..
Only for the minority. Also tyranny is a strong word. If the majoriti were as consise as you said they would surely have enough compassion for the few that do not completely agree
Very helpful, the accent is cute asf
One word i don't understand 😂
I found this from a Muslim called Mohammed Hijab
that broom face lol
A fairly good video until the totally ignorant statement; 'Bentham was essentially an armchair philosopher'
With great respect you need to read up on Bentham, his interests were entirely practical. He was responsible for a huge amount of social reform, was the moving force behind much legal reform, helped set up the UK's first police force, was one of founders of University College London, an antislavery campaigner etc, etc. He was not really a philosopher at all; he was only interested in practical results, this is absolutely clear in both his life and and writings. Why did you spoil an otherwise good video with such uninformed stupidity.
Fantastic explanation. I have been reading the Utilitarianism principles and wasn't understanding them very well. Thanks for helping me understand better.