00:00 Intro 02:00 Pep Guardiola sounded out for England managers job 04:00 The international games this week 05:00 Sir Alex's ambassadorial contract ended by INEOS 10:00 Proof of how bad our finances are 14:00 Answering comments 18:00 United new partnership with Lausanne 22:00 Multi club ownership is not the same as state ownership 27:00 The Mirror- EtH ready to play Jonny Evans as emergency LB? 34:00 Jonny Evans was good against Villa, but he's not a LB 35:00 Answering comments 37:00 Looking toward the Brentford game 41:00 United triggering contract extensions 42:00 Pure paper guff 44:00 Answering comments/questions 47:00 Wrapping up
People dost know that he was director of so called football board of united. Arnold invited him. So he has been part of united many bad years. We all know hes involvent in disastrous ronaldo transfer and he was the one who machined glazer takeout. Ye, he was great manager but its not all glory
If they want to cut costs, which is obviously needed, they should prioritize getting rid of under-performing high wage players. Rashford, Casemiro and Antony sticks out. And they should not have given Bruno that big wage bump. I know you love Bruno. I don't. Ok. But his new wage has become yet another problem. We are not a top 4 team anymore. And we can't keep given players wages that reflect a title winning side. Now I know it's not easy selling these players. Because of the wage, and the lack of perfomances from them. But they really need to stop giving out these contracts. I was really disappointed when Bruno got his. It didn't give the right signals. Yes, he is the captain. But does he really suit how we are trying to play. IMO, no. And to give him that high wage just gave us another player we can't offload if we want to. That cycle needs to stop. These wages will hold us "under water" for a long time, until it ends.
Yeah great mate, but where are you going to save money right now, considering the transfer window is closed and big transfers are mostly likely to happen in the summer.
paying 2m a year to a former manager is ridiculous and shows the club haven't been getting run by football people!! were a football club, not a retirement fund!! lets not forget the glazers first wiggled into united because of one of fergies dealings going pear shaped!! about time we moved on from the past so well done to ineos
90% of trophy cabinet in Man Utd is because of Ferguson. He is a legend of the club. You wouldn't see this at Liverpool and with Kenny. INEOS are a joke. They show that club is most about business than results. They keep ten Hag and sack Ferguson. Yet they still will pay 150k to Yoro, 300k to Bruno and 350k to Rashford.
The Club has been in debt for 20 years, but as soon as someone comes in and begins to sort it out by cutting unnecessary costs everyone loses their minds.
There were loads of back room staff, many on minimum wage, whom Ineos made redundant. This is going to even things a little. I’m 100% behind Ineos, well done 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
It's a bold move from ineos but probably the correct one! Cold? Nah! The cleaners or shop staff on low hours minimum wage contract loosing there jobs is cold. A multi millionair 82 year old loosing his 2 million pound contract isn't cols.
There were loads of back room staff, many on minimum wage, whom Ineos made redundant. This is going to even things a little. I’m 100% behind Ineos, well done 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻imagine how many weekly wages could have been paid by finishing Fergie’s £2m perk earlier.
While Fergie is and always will be a club legend, I can't help but feel that clinging to the Fergie era is what holds the club back. We aren't the same club we were in the 90s or 00s, and its time to accept that and start fresh. Stop bringing back old players as managers or coaches, no other clubs do that. Stop comparing to the CO92 and Ronanldo era. If we played those teams we would be destroyed.
@lloyd4301 I don't care about Fergie eras or the past. I'm sick of hearing about it. Fergie hasn't been manager since 2013, it's time to move on! You can't cling on to the past and expect it to make everything right in the present. What he did was great but it makes no difference now.
"Stop bringing back old players as managers or coaches, no other clubs do that." They literally do. Guardiola in Barcelona, Arteta in Arsenal, Tim Sherwood in Tottenham, Harry Redknapp in both Bournemouth and West Ham, Zidane in Real Madrid, Ancelotti in both Parma and AC Milan, Pirlo in Juventus, Conte in Juventus, Bayern Munchen has several. They all do this.
@88balloonsonthewall70 and how many of those have been successful? Guardiola and Zidane arguably had good teams before they took over, andelotti has had success but can't remember much with the teams you mentioned, and the rest speak for themselves as "successful". It doesn't work if only 1% is successful.
I'm certainly backing this decision. Football wise and money wise. He is absolutely legend and will live forever at the club with his memories. But it's time to cut ties executive and financial.
If United can’t sort out their left back problem (for over a year) why on Earth do people expect Rashford to do well. Look at his performances season by season when he had a fit and firing Luke Shaw, and he himself was fully fit. Chalk and cheese. The Ole years, Rashford played well (when fully fit) and in Ten Hag’s first season had a very good season.
Multi-club model is not good for the game esp when any other smaller European and South American footballing countries become inundated with these multi-club concept. The competition field is much reduced, crippling the opportunities for smaller clubs to grow. May be, business wise it could be good for the big clubs.
It’s obvious that we have a budding talent in Amass, yet we keep fielding fullbacks that easily get ‘disoriented’ on the left back position. How many times have that ‘trick’ failed? Countless times. Add that to not keeping A Fernandex or Reguilon (loan). That’s pure stupidity. Bottom line is, THROW AMASS IN THE DEEP POOL. He will eventually find his feet there.
The same fan base have been screaming for that practicality. You lots know exactly the financial state of the club in glazers era. So when ineos actually take the leap to improve the financial, the same fan base will crying out loud saying they are ruthless. Take a stand
Let's be honest, SAF has done well out of his time at Man Utd. Now you could make the argument that what he accomplished has catapulted Man Utd to a club that's worth billions today and compared to that what he has got out of it is pretty small in comparison but there were a lot of people involved in making Man Utd what they are today, he was a big part of course but just a part. I'm fine with this, he won't go short.
are we paying 2m a year to the busby family?? or any of the munich air disaster families? because man utd woudn't be anything without those people- so that logic that we are where we are because of fergie is ridiculous
Its a message , now what sane player would sign for us now. we ended Sir Alex contract & kept the useless manager. I bit sir Alex wanted this manager out & they were against it.
Start selling off the big name players on very high wages and bring in consistent solid up and coming performers, bring through more from the academy and keep it cycling to avoid hyper player wages, let them make huge money from sponsorships & advertising if they are successful.
Why is everything handled so poorly at Utd. Every important decision just leaves a bad taste. I 100% understand the Sir Alex move but I think back to Sir Matt there was a quiet respect and none of this bad press. Utd are completely different now.....
Sam, not happy with INEOS -- they will walk away from United when the fiscal abacus doesn't add up. The boat in Barcelona is estimated at 100 million (which is some ego trip!). I don't trust them, it's worrying. Thank you and best to all. Kev.
Ferguson has a huge love of money. And he’ll also see the likes of the glazers still benefitting economically from the value he added. Of course he cares. There’s no way this was amicable. He didn’t have to work for this money. It was golden handcuffs from the Glazers to keep him sweet. Same reason they gave him a statue so soon.
14:13 This is because we have owners who can’t afford the club and years of profligate spending bad management. Not sure I trust INEOS either they’re willing to do anything but to what end?
United have been hopeless in not ensuring they had at least ONE fit left back in the squad. Incredible that Ten Hag was not prepared to give Alvaro Fernandez a chance at left back. No wonder United struggle. It’s like going on to the pitch with 10.5 men - every game.
Peter Kenyon, gave the reasons why Man Utd haven't gone for South American Players in the past? they come with no culture of Fitness, they come with zero timing, or punctuality, for training, they don't have the same commitment to training, or healthy living, and it causes issues with players already at the club, by them getting treated differently
Ineos cutting ties with Sir Alex Ferguson reflects how even iconic legacies can be sidelined by financial priorities. It highlights the reality that in today’s corporate world, practical concerns often outweigh symbolic loyalty.
@@Doctor_Kroom Ah, good point! I guess it’s more of a “cost-effective reallocation of legacy,” not exactly cutting ties. Just a subtle shift from iconic ambassador to unpaid legend.
If you’re a player, coach, medical staff and so on would you rather play/work for a club that is known to cut costs or would you work for a club that over pays to the point they cook their books so they can pay more you more illegally (man city) United are done as a powerhouse, those days are over and the nail in the coffin would be INEOS taking over. Another 10 years fighting for top 5 and maybe a FA cup or two that’s about it. Don’t expect United to compete for the premier league or champions league.
I don't understand Ineos.Fergie built the club from perrenial under achievers, into a juggernaut. He took it from millions to billions&is a wonderful ambassador for the club,yet Ineos hang onto crap players pay them hundreds of thousands of pounds per week & their contributions to the club is sweet f all.The mind boggles.
United paid £40m+ costs for the Glazer’s seeking the deal they ended up doing with Ratcliffe. Could have paid fergie’s contract for the rest of his life and had millions left over, Let’s not pretend all costs are being cut. The only pain is for the workers and fans, not the owners. Everything done will always be to benefit the interests of the owners. That’s how 2 class economic systems work. The owners do what they want, the rest suffer what they must. Only one way out of that societal cancer.
Omg, sam! You are blind! Too much love for fergie has brought this club to the ground! You are deluded because of the success. When he retired, he should have left. He poked his nose in like he was the manager the whole time. Like I said, check your favourite players' interview when he explained that fergie would phone him and ask why is "this" player on the bench. Fair play to Jim Ratcliffe he is really making a difference at this club. Google "fergie and The Rock of the Gibraltar. All these things are being cut because Alex Ferguson tried to snake his friends, and the previous owners of manchester united! Thats why we are now lumbered with the glazers because Sir fergue is a snake and greedy. Hell no! He should not get 2.16mil to poke his nose in. Deep dive fergie and the rock of Gibraltar, and then be honest with your journalism. Wake up, fans! I love Alex Ferguson, but I hate him at the same time! He slumped our club with the glazers!
How is it a disgrace? What are you actually waffling about? The guy is EIGHTY-TWO he has bucket loads of money.. he doesn’t need TWO MILLION a year from us
Take a stand. "Fans" like you are the same one screaming for a proper board. When the said board is trying to fork up some money to fix the club, now u crying. You really think ineos would've done that without consulting SAF? Grow up.
![How to Get a Developer Job - Even in This Economy [Full Course]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/6nz8GXjxiHg/mqdefault.jpg)
00:00 Intro
02:00 Pep Guardiola sounded out for England managers job
04:00 The international games this week
05:00 Sir Alex's ambassadorial contract ended by INEOS
10:00 Proof of how bad our finances are
14:00 Answering comments
18:00 United new partnership with Lausanne
22:00 Multi club ownership is not the same as state ownership
27:00 The Mirror- EtH ready to play Jonny Evans as emergency LB?
34:00 Jonny Evans was good against Villa, but he's not a LB
35:00 Answering comments
37:00 Looking toward the Brentford game
41:00 United triggering contract extensions
42:00 Pure paper guff
44:00 Answering comments/questions
47:00 Wrapping up
100% the right decision. Sir Alex is a multi millionaire. & won't have a problem putting on his heating this winter. In my opinion right decision
People dost know that he was director of so called football board of united. Arnold invited him. So he has been part of united many bad years. We all know hes involvent in disastrous ronaldo transfer and he was the one who machined glazer takeout.
Ye, he was great manager but its not all glory
@@joni.sirvio8867omg someone who actually has understood what had happened.
agreed
The right decision. SAF will be OK money wise.
If they want to cut costs, which is obviously needed, they should prioritize getting rid of under-performing high wage players. Rashford, Casemiro and Antony sticks out. And they should not have given Bruno that big wage bump. I know you love Bruno. I don't. Ok. But his new wage has become yet another problem. We are not a top 4 team anymore. And we can't keep given players wages that reflect a title winning side.
Now I know it's not easy selling these players. Because of the wage, and the lack of perfomances from them. But they really need to stop giving out these contracts. I was really disappointed when Bruno got his. It didn't give the right signals. Yes, he is the captain. But does he really suit how we are trying to play. IMO, no. And to give him that high wage just gave us another player we can't offload if we want to.
That cycle needs to stop. These wages will hold us "under water" for a long time, until it ends.
agreed. that amount of wages should be earned only by real madrid/city players bcs they really deserved it. they never learn from rashy's.
Read my comment up top and learn why the decision was made.
The Rock of Gibraltar
Yeah great mate, but where are you going to save money right now, considering the transfer window is closed and big transfers are mostly likely to happen in the summer.
paying 2m a year to a former manager is ridiculous and shows the club haven't been getting run by football people!! were a football club, not a retirement fund!! lets not forget the glazers first wiggled into united because of one of fergies dealings going pear shaped!! about time we moved on from the past so well done to ineos
He's not just any old manager now, is he?
Do you know how much that man made for the club?
@@OserojiemenKingthat doesn’t mean we pay him £100k a week for life just for a quick chat and a smile.
@@moonbaby6134 Yes it does. That isnt much money for the club and for what he did for us he deserves every penny of it.
90% of trophy cabinet in Man Utd is because of Ferguson. He is a legend of the club.
You wouldn't see this at Liverpool and with Kenny. INEOS are a joke. They show that club is most about business than results. They keep ten Hag and sack Ferguson.
Yet they still will pay 150k to Yoro, 300k to Bruno and 350k to Rashford.
The Club has been in debt for 20 years, but as soon as someone comes in and begins to sort it out by cutting unnecessary costs everyone loses their minds.
There were loads of back room staff, many on minimum wage, whom Ineos made redundant. This is going to even things a little.
I’m 100% behind Ineos, well done 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
It's a bold move from ineos but probably the correct one!
Cold? Nah!
The cleaners or shop staff on low hours minimum wage contract loosing there jobs is cold.
A multi millionair 82 year old loosing his 2 million pound contract isn't cols.
Right decision. SAF will be fine. Business is business. fans seem to be struggling to move the club on…
There were loads of back room staff, many on minimum wage, whom Ineos made redundant. This is going to even things a little.
I’m 100% behind Ineos, well done 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻imagine how many weekly wages could have been paid by finishing Fergie’s £2m perk earlier.
Why are people upset with this is beyond me, obviously they are balancing the books
The first step to really ridding ourselves of the Fergie albatross
INEOS probably already talk with Sir Alex about his departure because I don't see any bad reaction from SAF
While Fergie is and always will be a club legend, I can't help but feel that clinging to the Fergie era is what holds the club back. We aren't the same club we were in the 90s or 00s, and its time to accept that and start fresh. Stop bringing back old players as managers or coaches, no other clubs do that. Stop comparing to the CO92 and Ronanldo era. If we played those teams we would be destroyed.
Well said!
A better comparison would be the Uniteds of the 70s and 80s. Fergie had a lot of the same issues that ETH has when he first came.
@lloyd4301 I don't care about Fergie eras or the past. I'm sick of hearing about it. Fergie hasn't been manager since 2013, it's time to move on!
You can't cling on to the past and expect it to make everything right in the present. What he did was great but it makes no difference now.
"Stop bringing back old players as managers or coaches, no other clubs do that." They literally do. Guardiola in Barcelona, Arteta in Arsenal, Tim Sherwood in Tottenham, Harry Redknapp in both Bournemouth and West Ham, Zidane in Real Madrid, Ancelotti in both Parma and AC Milan, Pirlo in Juventus, Conte in Juventus, Bayern Munchen has several. They all do this.
@88balloonsonthewall70 and how many of those have been successful? Guardiola and Zidane arguably had good teams before they took over, andelotti has had success but can't remember much with the teams you mentioned, and the rest speak for themselves as "successful".
It doesn't work if only 1% is successful.
I'm certainly backing this decision. Football wise and money wise. He is absolutely legend and will live forever at the club with his memories. But it's time to cut ties executive and financial.
If United can’t sort out their left back problem (for over a year) why on Earth do people expect Rashford to do well. Look at his performances season by season when he had a fit and firing Luke Shaw, and he himself was fully fit. Chalk and cheese. The Ole years, Rashford played well (when fully fit) and in Ten Hag’s first season had a very good season.
I’ve said it last season that Rashford missed the partnership/understanding he had on the left wing with Shaw & Sancho. Just stating the facts.
Multi-club model is not good for the game esp when any other smaller European and South American footballing countries become inundated with these multi-club concept. The competition field is much reduced, crippling the opportunities for smaller clubs to grow. May be, business wise it could be good for the big clubs.
It’s obvious that we have a budding talent in Amass, yet we keep fielding fullbacks that easily get ‘disoriented’ on the left back position. How many times have that ‘trick’ failed? Countless times. Add that to not keeping A Fernandex or Reguilon (loan). That’s pure stupidity.
Bottom line is, THROW AMASS IN THE DEEP POOL. He will eventually find his feet there.
My car broke down, why trains can run?
Nice analogy
Maybe we can fix the roof now? 2m 😅
Lol😂
😂
😂😂😂😂😂
2m a year for ten years 😂😂 fergie scamming his old club
His whole family have for 30yrs
I'm sure he didn't write up the contract, the man can take whatever he wants, he's given more than enough
The same fan base have been screaming for that practicality. You lots know exactly the financial state of the club in glazers era. So when ineos actually take the leap to improve the financial, the same fan base will crying out loud saying they are ruthless. Take a stand
Fergie as done well out of the glazers taken the £££ and said nothing against them is he fan does he care ?
Let's be honest, SAF has done well out of his time at Man Utd. Now you could make the argument that what he accomplished has catapulted Man Utd to a club that's worth billions today and compared to that what he has got out of it is pretty small in comparison but there were a lot of people involved in making Man Utd what they are today, he was a big part of course but just a part. I'm fine with this, he won't go short.
I’m sure the boss knows what’s best for the club and isn’t short of cash. He’ll no doubt have a key to both carrington and old Trafford.
A bloke in work with me supports Man City. He has said for over a year that Pep would be the next England manager
😂😂😂😂😂
@@MrGts92 Aged well, didn't it 😂😂😂
are we paying 2m a year to the busby family?? or any of the munich air disaster families? because man utd woudn't be anything without those people- so that logic that we are where we are because of fergie is ridiculous
Its a message , now what sane player would sign for us now. we ended Sir Alex contract & kept the useless manager. I bit sir Alex wanted this manager out & they were against it.
Rather they cut underperforming players
Start selling off the big name players on very high wages and bring in consistent solid up and coming performers, bring through more from the academy and keep it cycling to avoid hyper player wages, let them make huge money from sponsorships & advertising if they are successful.
Why is everything handled so poorly at Utd. Every important decision just leaves a bad taste. I 100% understand the Sir Alex move but I think back to Sir Matt there was a quiet respect and none of this bad press. Utd are completely different now.....
Bad press is your perception by falling for media manipulation of turning anything about United negative.
@Doctor_Kroom That's an interesting point and I hear you but other than the awesome display in last seasons FA Cup final I'm stumped.
New mgmt and restructuring is normal,we need to clear out all duplicate task.
Sam, not happy with INEOS -- they will walk away from United when the fiscal abacus doesn't add up. The boat in Barcelona is estimated at 100 million (which is some ego trip!). I don't trust them, it's worrying. Thank you and best to all. Kev.
can't decide who is more enjoyable comedy content...the club...or the fickle fans. Best comedy on the planet.....boring....but comical
Sack a man who delivered all this success, but keep a failing incompetent manager, yep makes sense.
Ferguson has a huge love of money. And he’ll also see the likes of the glazers still benefitting economically from the value he added. Of course he cares. There’s no way this was amicable.
He didn’t have to work for this money. It was golden handcuffs from the Glazers to keep him sweet. Same reason they gave him a statue so soon.
What happened to the intro?
14:13 This is because we have owners who can’t afford the club and years of profligate spending bad management. Not sure I trust INEOS either they’re willing to do anything but to what end?
Sorry misspelled their .
2.16 million to have an ex telling you how to fold your clothes 😂😂😂
United have been hopeless in not ensuring they had at least ONE fit left back in the squad. Incredible that Ten Hag was not prepared to give Alvaro Fernandez a chance at left back. No wonder United struggle. It’s like going on to the pitch with 10.5 men - every game.
Peter Kenyon, gave the reasons why Man Utd haven't gone for South American Players in the past? they come with no culture of Fitness,
they come with zero timing, or punctuality, for training, they don't have the same commitment to training, or healthy living, and it causes issues with
players already at the club, by them getting treated differently
Ineos cutting ties with Sir Alex Ferguson reflects how even iconic legacies can be sidelined by financial priorities. It highlights the reality that in today’s corporate world, practical concerns often outweigh symbolic loyalty.
Cutting ties? He is a board member
@@Doctor_Kroom Ah, good point! I guess it’s more of a “cost-effective reallocation of legacy,” not exactly cutting ties. Just a subtle shift from iconic ambassador to unpaid legend.
Look SAF he has milked it over 10 years.
If you’re a player, coach, medical staff and so on would you rather play/work for a club that is known to cut costs or would you work for a club that over pays to the point they cook their books so they can pay more you more illegally (man city) United are done as a powerhouse, those days are over and the nail in the coffin would be INEOS taking over. Another 10 years fighting for top 5 and maybe a FA cup or two that’s about it. Don’t expect United to compete for the premier league or champions league.
Yall simpleton really think that ineos would've taken that measure without consulting SAF in the first place?
I don't understand Ineos.Fergie built the club from perrenial under achievers, into a juggernaut. He took it from millions to billions&is a wonderful ambassador for the club,yet Ineos hang onto crap players pay them hundreds of thousands of pounds per week & their contributions to the club is sweet f all.The mind boggles.
Sam when you gonna wise up? Theyve sacked thousands of low paid staff..keeping millionaire fergie after these sackings was appalling.
Amass in injured too
United paid £40m+ costs for the Glazer’s seeking the deal they ended up doing with Ratcliffe. Could have paid fergie’s contract for the rest of his life and had millions left over, Let’s not pretend all costs are being cut. The only pain is for the workers and fans, not the owners. Everything done will always be to benefit the interests of the owners. That’s how 2 class economic systems work. The owners do what they want, the rest suffer what they must.
Only one way out of that societal cancer.
Why is he getting the multi million dollars for though
It’s disgusting fergie doesn’t deserve this absolutely fuming and so should the fans, first big mistake from
Ineos.
SAF after leaving Man U is a traitor. He never help the club at all. Because in his heart, he doesn't anyone to do better than him.
Weird comment and opinion. He's the greatest manager to ever live and he's one of our own.
Sack fergie,.keep the glazers that's a good idea. Roll on the gravy train
Well done, ineos Fergie was a big reason why Glazers are at utd he's never spoken out against them in 20years no respect for him n I'm a utd fan
He won the UCL while the Glazers were at the club and If not for him we would be midtable in the championship so how don't you respect him
You're not a united stfu. Fergie is the greatest manager this club or any other club has had.
Shhhh.. glaser out but not our legend who machined whole thing, right?
Fergie 10 Man U and Ineos. 0
Our multi club model will be PSG if we fall into the hands of Qatar
Omg, sam! You are blind! Too much love for fergie has brought this club to the ground! You are deluded because of the success. When he retired, he should have left. He poked his nose in like he was the manager the whole time. Like I said, check your favourite players' interview when he explained that fergie would phone him and ask why is "this" player on the bench. Fair play to Jim Ratcliffe he is really making a difference at this club. Google "fergie and The Rock of the Gibraltar.
All these things are being cut because Alex Ferguson tried to snake his friends, and the previous owners of manchester united! Thats why we are now lumbered with the glazers because Sir fergue is a snake and greedy.
Hell no! He should not get 2.16mil to poke his nose in.
Deep dive fergie and the rock of Gibraltar, and then be honest with your journalism. Wake up, fans!
I love Alex Ferguson, but I hate him at the same time! He slumped our club with the glazers!
Instead of sacking the incompetent manager Ineos are focused on the wrong things like sir Alex
Sorry Sam but that may well be one of the most fascist looking thumbnails I've seen in a long time 🤣🤣
wtf are INEOS doing?
Come on Sam don't sugar coat what ineos have done to fergie is a disgrace
A disgrace 😂 it’s not at all. we need to move on
Milked utd enough have he ever spoken out against glazers 😮
How is it a disgrace? What are you actually waffling about? The guy is EIGHTY-TWO he has bucket loads of money.. he doesn’t need TWO MILLION a year from us
Take a stand. "Fans" like you are the same one screaming for a proper board. When the said board is trying to fork up some money to fix the club, now u crying. You really think ineos would've done that without consulting SAF? Grow up.
@@Koutsimouka it’s not from us mate. It was from ineos and the glazers. It’s their club, their money, their decisions, their interests being served.
As I said from the beginning, Ineos is here to destroy Man United