How Electricity is Generated: 1960 Intro Training, Electrical Generators, DC AC, Nuclear Reactors

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 17 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 59

  • @sumitnarkhede.3105
    @sumitnarkhede.3105 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    BEST SIMPLE AND DETAILED PRESENTATION THANK YOU SIR.

  • @RetroEli1982
    @RetroEli1982 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    Super informative(and cool) video

    • @ComputerHistoryArchivesProject
      @ComputerHistoryArchivesProject  หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Glad you liked it! I appreciate the great feedback. It was fun to see this restored to its original clarity! ~

  • @nmaedu.100
    @nmaedu.100 25 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    yes very good way to understanding of electricity basics

  • @tadonplane8265
    @tadonplane8265 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    This is middle school science class. But in 1960 it was junior high.

  • @thesteelrodent1796
    @thesteelrodent1796 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Neat old film. Reminds me of elementary school phsysics class. The historical facts are a little fuzzy and not entirely accurate, but I guess for the explanation they're trying to make, it's not that important that half of what they show isn't directly related to Faraday.

  • @fefafafe5059
    @fefafafe5059 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Nice Explication

  • @ramirosuarez9537
    @ramirosuarez9537 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Nice explanation for the time

    • @ComputerHistoryArchivesProject
      @ComputerHistoryArchivesProject  หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes, the clarity was refreshing too. Thank you for your feedback!

    • @ramirosuarez9537
      @ramirosuarez9537 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@ComputerHistoryArchivesProject New subscriber ... check
      Thanks to you!

  • @intel386DX
    @intel386DX หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    We never pass the steem era 😅😂 fantastic video.😊

  • @skivvy3565
    @skivvy3565 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Informative. Concise. Doesn’t patronize and insult your intelligence. Not monosyllabic bloated clickbait.
    We really have regressed as a civilization lol

    • @richardgray8593
      @richardgray8593 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Needs some hip-hop beats in the sound track, yo.

    • @ComputerHistoryArchivesProject
      @ComputerHistoryArchivesProject  หลายเดือนก่อน

      Hi @skivvy3565, glad you enjoyed it! Good observations, have to agree w/you. : )

    • @OldWorldAscension
      @OldWorldAscension หลายเดือนก่อน

      Meaning, it's doesn't sound like cheap salesman talk.

  • @SelvaRajRabel
    @SelvaRajRabel หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    very very usefull ❤

  • @Larochaess
    @Larochaess 19 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Tuhan tidak akan menciptakan sedih, tanpa merencanakan bahagia setelahnya. One day you will be the best version of u

  • @bblod4896
    @bblod4896 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Cool. I remember those movies on 16mm film? Been so long, I've forgotten 😂

    • @ComputerHistoryArchivesProject
      @ComputerHistoryArchivesProject  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Hi @bblod4896, and bet there are a hundred more out there waiting to be rediscovered and restored! Always time to learn more. : )
      @bblod4896

    • @bblod4896
      @bblod4896 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@ComputerHistoryArchivesProject
      Yes, or relive my youth 😂

  • @rbk2745
    @rbk2745 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Wonderful. 👏👏👏

  • @rahulsonkamble5926
    @rahulsonkamble5926 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Best knowledge sir

  • @MrGeraldino250
    @MrGeraldino250 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Excelent thanks

  • @tangoalpha8381
    @tangoalpha8381 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Excellent video 👍🇧🇷👍🇧🇷

  • @kc4cvh
    @kc4cvh หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    2:07 Burgess batteries. Recognized by their stripes, remembered for their service. I haven't seen them in a long time.

  • @InfiniteLoop
    @InfiniteLoop หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    very cool video, I love these old science shows, but I have to wonder, in 1960 when their was shown, how many of the viewers said "did he say that thing had a communist 'tater in it?"

  • @ronaldochaveiro4446
    @ronaldochaveiro4446 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Muito top 73 aí voz do Deserto RJ br

  • @Salehdolfin
    @Salehdolfin 22 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    I have a mini dynamo which gives 24 to 27 volts in output but the amperes are very less, how to increase the amperes?
    And same volt only increase ampere 😊😊

    • @ComputerHistoryArchivesProject
      @ComputerHistoryArchivesProject  17 วันที่ผ่านมา

      One suggestion was to increase the ampere to volt ratio, you can connect multiple power supplies in parallel. When power supplies are connected in parallel, the voltage remains the same, but the total current available increases. - Never tried this, but it is an idea.

  • @Franklin-jj4jz
    @Franklin-jj4jz หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    10:33, Downtown Portland, Oregon.

  • @gsamygsamyngovindasamy9530
    @gsamygsamyngovindasamy9530 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I like you welcome iam Indian village tecnecian ❤

    • @ComputerHistoryArchivesProject
      @ComputerHistoryArchivesProject  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Hi @gsamygsamyngovindasamy9530, very glad you enjoyed it. Thank you for your feedback! ~ VK

  • @victimovtalent6036
    @victimovtalent6036 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Transfering kinetic energy to other places

  • @EmmanuelMatabaro
    @EmmanuelMatabaro หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Could you tell me please what drives the turbine blades to turn, is it the force of the steam or the heat of the steam?🤷

    • @ComputerHistoryArchivesProject
      @ComputerHistoryArchivesProject  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Hi @EmmanuelMatabaro, I believe the expanding nature of the steam causes the turbines to turn; a high volume of expanding gas pushing its way through and out. That's my understanding. Good question, thank you!

    • @EmmanuelMatabaro
      @EmmanuelMatabaro หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@ComputerHistoryArchivesProject Thank you too

  • @Lackaustausch
    @Lackaustausch หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    AC⚡DC 🤘😁

  • @MartinThePanda
    @MartinThePanda 26 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    They don't teach like they used to no more.

  • @PravdaSeed.96
    @PravdaSeed.96 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    💙 Master 💙
    Nikola Tesla
    🧲⚡🧲⚡🧲
    🌍☸️☯️🕉️🌎

  • @PeterMilanovski
    @PeterMilanovski หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Lots of explanation but still doesn't say where the electric charge comes from!
    This video just shows you how to harvest it, and that's really all that is happening!
    And if you are able to harvest it from somewhere or something else, then I want to know what these machines are getting it from!
    Clearly the energy existed somewhere else before it was harvested! The real question is where?
    And this leads to the next question of free energy! If energy wasn't free, then whatever is harvesting this energy should not be able to get it due to energy not being free to be harvested in the first place!
    I don't buy this explanation of the energy comes from the work out it to get energy out! Even if I use a hand crank generator, the electric charge isn't coming from my body!
    There's something there that no one seems to be saying anything about and that's probably because no one knows!
    It's like a generator is plucking electricity out of thin air?
    I think that this just demonstrates how little we know and understand about the one thing that has changed the way we live!

    • @ComputerHistoryArchivesProject
      @ComputerHistoryArchivesProject  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Hi @PeterMilanovski, you have some good points and good questions! Looking at the research in this field is quite interesting. This film does not go into the physics of electron movement or vibration, or the potential difference such things cause across a distance. Schools used to teach that electrons flowed from one point to another. Other theories talk about vibrational interaction of potential states. It is a fascinating thing to research and explore the theories. The film just gives some practical theory on how it can be demonstrated with physical objects. Perhaps others viewing this may have some other helpful thoughts. Thanks for the deeper dive into this! ~ VK, CHAP

    • @PeterMilanovski
      @PeterMilanovski หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@ComputerHistoryArchivesProject thank you for your response, I think that the point I wanted to make was that at some point in time we were being taught that we were the centre of the universe but today we think differently, and then there's that time when the earth was flat, and then not to some people thinking that it's flat again!
      The talk given in this video is a sort of understanding, it's not the only way it can be understood but just one of possibly many.
      I could possibly talk about this all week and you could possibly learn that there is yet another way of understanding what is going on, but that's not important or at least I don't think that it's important anymore... I used to think that it was once apon a time, but it didn't take long to realise that the general public doesn't understand and nor do they care! The people who should care are only interested in upholding old ideas or protecting their own Noble prize winning ideas regardless if they are right or wrong....
      I have seen so many great people who have proposed great ideas and explanations that were closer to the truth but were rejected by the scientific community because they couldn't understand it only to find out many years later that it was right and that he was way ahead of his time!
      Here! I will let you in on the biggest misconception in the history of science....
      Going by your response I believe that this should not be too difficult for you to understand....
      We are taught that the atom is made of a proton which is supposed to be positively charged, a neutron which either has no charge or carries a charge somewhere in between the proton and electron (I have yet to find a clear definition of the neutron) and finally the electron which is supposed to carry a negative charge!
      Now... This is where I have a problem, a long time ago Benjamin Franklin wrote about the electric charge from his experiments performed...
      His conclusion led to his explanation of and in his words was..... The electric charge is a problem of accounting.... It's like a bank account, when you have more money in your account, you will be in credit and we will call this positive, when you owe money, you are in debt and we will call this negative!
      Now, there's nothing in his statement that suggests that there is a positive and negative charge! Meaning that there's only one electric charge and you can have either more or less of it!
      So this would suggest that the proton in an atom has more charge than both the neutron and electron.... Which is supposed to have the least amount of charge....
      Which would also mean that a battery which is marked with a positive and negative symbol should mean that one side is carrying more charge than the other, and just like how hot will flow into cold, the side of a battery which carries more charge will flow into the side with the least! You can see the same effect by putting two rechargeable batteries together with both batteries at different charge states, the battery with a higher charge state will flow charge into the other lower charge state battery....
      And just like heat, the electric charge is looking for equilibrium which is what we would consider as the battery being flat.... It still has a charge, but both plates are now equal, and without the potential difference, there's no reason for the charge to flow....
      Once you see the problem with the explanation of the atom and the problem with the explanation of the electric charge, you slowly begin to find out things that make sense...
      In this video you will hear talking like there's both a positive and negative charge... Benjamin Franklin was correct, there's only one charge! And surface area determines how much charge will be carried.... That's why there is an oxide layer on plates, the rough oxide layer contains more surface area than that of a smooth layer.... Makes sense doesn't it.... There's a lot more but I'm not going to get into it here... This is already to long as a post....
      My research and newfound understanding has led me to the understanding of what gravity is and more importantly what it isn't.... You wouldn't believe how simple science can be and still work... Imagine being able to look at anything and automatically be able to see how and why something works and how it's connected with its immediate surroundings... Honestly it's mind blowing.... I have seen things that everyone else can't... It's right there in front of your nose but you can't see it because you were taught to not see it! Ohhhh you have your explanation for what you see but it's so disjointed that you don't really see what is going on.... Words can make or break an understanding...

  • @marekkowalski6767
    @marekkowalski6767 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    tnx 🇵🇱 Warsaw.