Considering that many things could happen in real life and you can't program them in you will need a control tower that could take the control at any time so who needs hacking?
with the hundreds of thousands of cars in America the fact all you hear is news stories ignorant takes on what they perceive vs taking actual big data statistics on what a better network and more funding is all this is missing and i find it hilarious what people are not seeing
They keep stopping and just sitting there on 18th St in front of camelback colonnade. The thing is that's how you get on the 51 south. Someone is gonna run right into the back of one.
You would NEVER have that because there all always bizzare and strange situations that we didn't thought to program it ( like a person awaking on the sidewalk eith a huge STOP sign sticking out from his backpack. In order to deal eith that you need to have a control tower giving instructions on how to proceeed further but hiw many people are comfortable to be in a car where the orders come from an anonymous person in a control tower? Who is comfortable knowing that a person could take control of your car anytime?
with the hundreds of thousands of cars in America the fact all you hear is news stories ignorant takes on what they perceive vs taking actual big data statistics on what a better network and more funding is all this is missing and i find it hilarious what people are not seeing
@@deficator750 Waymo has been successfully operating an FSD ride hailing service in Arizona for over a year now. I’ve used it several times and it drives better than most Uber and Lyft drivers do without any of the awkward small talk.
It's called emergent behavior. It is behavior that is only possible through interactions with each other, that cannot happen alone. For example, it is easy to imagine them getting into a situation where the two vehicles are both waiting for the other one to proceed. It's a classic "deadlock". "You go first", "No you go first", "No you go first", "No you go first" ... Two infinitely polite people will never go. Whenever that happens with a human driver, the human driver gets irritated and goes, taking a risk if necessary. The computer won't decide to take a risk, obviously.
A car that do not understand hand signals and ORDERS from emergency personnel have no business being on the road !!! If I ignore the hand signals and orders of a police I will loose my drivers licence and go to jail, those who sent those cars out into traffic should go to jail because they are dangerous when they can not understand orders what to do.
does it detect the same as fast moving motorcyle's than same as a car? what about a brick from a trailer? or just boxed in? making the car not being about to 360 camera its way out?
with the hundreds of thousands of cars in America the fact all you hear is news stories ignorant takes on what they perceive vs taking actual big data statistics on what a better network and more funding is all this is missing and i find it hilarious what people are not seeing
A human can instantly recognize an empty garbage bag blowing into the road. AI car will interpret the same as somthing it has to stop for or turn away from instantly... Things like that is why AI cars has NO business being on the roads, they are dangerous and can for example not understand hand signals and orders given by emergency personnel.
Program your cars to recognize a 4 way (N,S,E,W) intersection in which traffic only stops in two directions (E&W). I've come close to being in collisions with your AI technology @ 3rd Ave and Monroe twice in the last week!
actually its wrong for the council and road authority to allow driverless robot cars at this stage of experiment?china is way advance for robot cars and they still have driver that dont interfere but observe?
I'm surprised they don't have the option for someone to simply drive it remotely like a drone from their headquarters when there is a problem like this.
Like Tesla did in that tunnel? In China they couldn't prove it because "the car didn't see that the break was pushed " even if you think about it is the car would have detected that the break was pushed we wouldn't have been in this situation in the first place
When you mive up atspeedand cars decelerate extremely fast ( like Tesla tend to do) it is very hard to avoid collision, see the tunnel accident and the findings.
with the hundreds of thousands of cars in America the fact all you hear is news stories ignorant takes on what they perceive vs taking actual big data statistics on what a better network and more funding is all this is missing and i find it hilarious what people are not seeing
Self driving algorithm are still far away from perfection but every problem is new data to be studied and fix, it's maybe will take 20-30 more years to have mature self driving vehicle
whos at fault with a 3 way crash even if the waymo car didnt do anything but cuz it was there did more damage cuz it stood still? like when fire department comes cruzing past and "EVERYONE LOOKING" seeing the truck, we all pull safely to the right and slow down even in a red light. whats Waymo doing? im hoping a smart answer cuz AI is smarter than me but im a daily motorcyle rider. i ride with a gopro for my sake but i love it and its cheaper. just deal with the 115 degrees in arizona.
Uber did kill one in 2018. When you consider the number of cars that are drived by humans, how many hours and in what conditions you will see that autonomous cars are way worse. If you took Elon Musk presentation you are mislead because he was comparing Tesla's hours driven on a highway with the overall number of accidents done by humans in all conditions. In reality, the highway accidents are rare compared to the rest. If he would have been honest and adjusted the statictics for the type of the road,number of cars and the time driven you would have had a vert bad situation for Tesla.
These really need to be removed from the roads. There are so many potential hazards and things that can and do go wrong, not including hackers ability to get into the system and taking over the car. It’s shocking to me how these are even allowed to be on the road to begin with.
These cars will be (in fact probably already are) safer than any human. I had three friends in their late 20s/early 30s who were taken way too soon in three separate incidents, who would still be alive if everyone had a driverless car. There's nothing "goofy" or "hokey" about that.
@@davidpacheco5501 Nothing? It’s completely hokey. Yes they “may” avoid a vehicular accident, but not pedestrians or cyclists, or police apparently. It’s fun and cute, but not realistic. We’re trying too hard to make this happen with no benefit at all.
You mean like the 2018 Uber Arizona kill because the engineers put a 8 seconds delay to ignore the false obstacle detection that created sudden breaks?
@@elenabob4953 About 20 pedestrians get killed everyday by human drivers if you add bicycles it's about 23. That's around ~7,500 people and another ~1000 bicyclists dead every year. The best you can point out is one death 5 and half years ago? Sounds really dangerous...
Came upon a Waymo at a green light, it was just sitting there looking stupid, so I rammed it out of the way with my Ford Super Duty 350…I slept great that night.
I honestly can't believe humans have become so stupid to believe driverless cars are a good idea. What ever happened to being proud of the vehicle you pay for with your hard work and wanting to drive it?? Crazy
This is so wrong. I don't want to be on the road with remotely controlled or AI self driving vehicles of any kind.. Trucks are not off the board. When these machines surround to have glitches and/or runs other cars of the road or stops on a freeway parking in heavy traffic during rush hours. 😮🤦♀️🎭🚮☠️ This is a public health hazard waiting to happen 😢🎭☠️
What if the car initially has been programmed to drop you off to a Starbucks few blocks from you, as you have requested it , but somehow the system of the vehicle flips out on you, locks all the doors and you end up being dropped out to San Francisco 😂?
There’s a button in the app and on the dash to end your ride, and you can also always hit another button to talk to Waymo customer service. They’re usually pretty good. Have you ever ridden in a Waymo?
You can't be serious? Cars without drivers are LEGALLY running around on public streets? We already have hundreds of thousands of "smart phone" types running around causing accidents, and now there are cars on the streets with no drivers at all? I'm calling the AZ state legislature and making a complaint. Somebody needs to take action to prevent this. If they don't, these things need to be disabled somehow.
YEAH A HUMANS NEVER GET IN TRAFFIC JAMS ! AS USUAL 12 SPINS A NARRATIVE OF STUPID FOR THE STUPID. AND THIS INTURNS CREATES ANGER AGAINST A TECHNOLOGY THAT FOR THE MOST PART IS NEAR FLAWLESS.
![KRK - ชนิสรา Ft.WanMai , N/A [Official MV] Prod. By Sakarin](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/C-WMwwYobcU/mqdefault.jpg)
It's like the cars that glitch in GTA.
AI is above the law.
What happens when it’s hacked??
It shuts down that’s what you witnessed happen that’s what they’re not speaking on but research it and you’ll find that’s what happened.
When it gets hacked, then you're whacked.
Considering that many things could happen in real life and you can't program them in you will need a control tower that could take the control at any time so who needs hacking?
I saw one impeding traffic it didn’t know how to use the turning lane 😡
Sounds like it's learning to be a normal Phoenix driver.
That's really horrible and this company should be fined finesse nonsense
with the hundreds of thousands of cars in America the fact all you hear is news stories ignorant takes on what they perceive vs taking actual big data statistics on what a better network and more funding is all this is missing and i find it hilarious what people are not seeing
They keep stopping and just sitting there on 18th St in front of camelback colonnade. The thing is that's how you get on the 51 south. Someone is gonna run right into the back of one.
how is this not a critical glitch, you'd need to make it autonomous enough to problem solve in different situations.
You would NEVER have that because there all always bizzare and strange situations that we didn't thought to program it ( like a person awaking on the sidewalk eith a huge STOP sign sticking out from his backpack. In order to deal eith that you need to have a control tower giving instructions on how to proceeed further but hiw many people are comfortable to be in a car where the orders come from an anonymous person in a control tower? Who is comfortable knowing that a person could take control of your car anytime?
@@elenabob4953 this is my point. Fsd will never succeed its an extremely far fetched claim
with the hundreds of thousands of cars in America the fact all you hear is news stories ignorant takes on what they perceive vs taking actual big data statistics on what a better network and more funding is all this is missing and i find it hilarious what people are not seeing
@@deficator750 Waymo has been successfully operating an FSD ride hailing service in Arizona for over a year now. I’ve used it several times and it drives better than most Uber and Lyft drivers do without any of the awkward small talk.
@@danieldaniels7571 ok lol
It's called emergent behavior. It is behavior that is only possible through interactions with each other, that cannot happen alone. For example, it is easy to imagine them getting into a situation where the two vehicles are both waiting for the other one to proceed. It's a classic "deadlock". "You go first", "No you go first", "No you go first", "No you go first" ... Two infinitely polite people will never go. Whenever that happens with a human driver, the human driver gets irritated and goes, taking a risk if necessary. The computer won't decide to take a risk, obviously.
Very good point. That is exactly what happened here.
Can you picture will smith in “IRobot “? “You know, somehow-I told you so-just doesn’t quite say it”.
A car that do not understand hand signals and ORDERS from emergency personnel have no business being on the road !!! If I ignore the hand signals and orders of a police I will loose my drivers licence and go to jail, those who sent those cars out into traffic should go to jail because they are dangerous when they can not understand orders what to do.
This is pure corporate greed and narcissism
how? This is awesome that they even made it this far. Self driving cars would be such a convenience!
Can't Waymo CEOs be charged with obstructing traffic?
Anyone have any thoughts on pilotless airplanes? Good or bad?
ehhh thats up in the air and with 300+ people... cant use that sorry not found.
@ahhburger wait till yall learn about autopilot and cat 3 autoland
Pilots will tell you that they're on autopilot sometimes for a long time while you're sitting back there in the airplane
@@FlipSRT4 I mean autopilot is like cruise control. I'm fine with that but when waymo start flying planes...
bad, very bad
does it detect the same as fast moving motorcyle's than same as a car? what about a brick from a trailer? or just boxed in? making the car not being about to 360 camera its way out?
with the hundreds of thousands of cars in America the fact all you hear is news stories ignorant takes on what they perceive vs taking actual big data statistics on what a better network and more funding is all this is missing and i find it hilarious what people are not seeing
They plow right over motorcycles.
A human can instantly recognize an empty garbage bag blowing into the road. AI car will interpret the same as somthing it has to stop for or turn away from instantly... Things like that is why AI cars has NO business being on the roads, they are dangerous and can for example not understand hand signals and orders given by emergency personnel.
@@a64738 VERY GOOD POINTS! I hate them as im a daily motorycle rider for 11 years in phoenix arizona area
Driverless cars are remote controlled cars......and their will always be glitches or bad weather😂
Program your cars to recognize a 4 way (N,S,E,W) intersection in which traffic only stops in two directions (E&W). I've come close to being in collisions with your AI technology @ 3rd Ave and Monroe twice in the last week!
One bad software update and you have an army of faulty two ton vehicles
actually its wrong for the council and road authority to allow driverless robot cars at this stage of experiment?china is way advance for robot cars and they still have driver that dont interfere but observe?
Just wait when people go to work and get stuck in traffic there late to work
I wonder when people with beautiful skin gets in will the cop react differently?
Technology is wonderful until it stops working, and it will.
Keep a low tech backup whenever possible.
Low tech backup you mean human 😂
I'm surprised they don't have the option for someone to simply drive it remotely like a drone from their headquarters when there is a problem like this.
This is hysterical!
Yeah until it somehow causes a serious accident
@@gardensofthegods how would this cause a serious accident?
Like Tesla did in that tunnel?
In China they couldn't prove it because "the car didn't see that the break was pushed " even if you think about it is the car would have detected that the break was pushed we wouldn't have been in this situation in the first place
When you mive up atspeedand cars decelerate extremely fast ( like Tesla tend to do) it is very hard to avoid collision, see the tunnel accident and the findings.
with the hundreds of thousands of cars in America the fact all you hear is news stories ignorant takes on what they perceive vs taking actual big data statistics on what a better network and more funding is all this is missing and i find it hilarious what people are not seeing
Nope!😝👎 This looks like Waymo Trouble than it’s worth!
😂😂😂
Self driving algorithm are still far away from perfection but every problem is new data to be studied and fix, it's maybe will take 20-30 more years to have mature self driving vehicle
give me a human driver anytime.
Physical tools for AI to synchronize someday. This is a horrible idea.
No it's not
whos at fault with a 3 way crash even if the waymo car didnt do anything but cuz it was there did more damage cuz it stood still? like when fire department comes cruzing past and "EVERYONE LOOKING" seeing the truck, we all pull safely to the right and slow down even in a red light. whats Waymo doing? im hoping a smart answer cuz AI is smarter than me but im a daily motorcyle rider. i ride with a gopro for my sake but i love it and its cheaper. just deal with the 115 degrees in arizona.
Just call customer support and they'll be with you in a month.
Human drivers are required.
Human drivers have killed many thousands of other humans with bad driving. Waymo driver hasn't killed any.
@@danieldaniels7571its about to send millions of taxi drivers to unemployment
@@kojac40 Uber and Lyft did that a decade ago.
No
Uber did kill one in 2018.
When you consider the number of cars that are drived by humans, how many hours and in what conditions you will see that autonomous cars are way worse. If you took Elon Musk presentation you are mislead because he was comparing Tesla's hours driven on a highway with the overall number of accidents done by humans in all conditions. In reality, the highway accidents are rare compared to the rest. If he would have been honest and adjusted the statictics for the type of the road,number of cars and the time driven you would have had a vert bad situation for Tesla.
Imagine getting a ticket for not pulling over and it’s not your fault 😂
You still need insurance, inspection, seat belt etc. There are a lot of stuff to get tickets
Summoning features on Tesla has issues
Trust fall to computer glitches
I thought I seen one driving yesterday?
I see them almost every day
Not like these could be hacked and loaded with a bomb or anything.
No thanks...no judgment making..if an accident happens...or car just stops in mid traffic and cause harm...
Tesla drivers are bad enough now this.
Why you want kill jobs there is a lot of driver without jobs
These really need to be removed from the roads. There are so many potential hazards and things that can and do go wrong, not including hackers ability to get into the system and taking over the car. It’s shocking to me how these are even allowed to be on the road to begin with.
Such goofy, hokey technology. We have a sick craving for what’s considered “luxury” and progress. It’s fine for toys, but not for real life.
These cars will be (in fact probably already are) safer than any human. I had three friends in their late 20s/early 30s who were taken way too soon in three separate incidents, who would still be alive if everyone had a driverless car. There's nothing "goofy" or "hokey" about that.
@@davidpacheco5501 Nothing? It’s completely hokey. Yes they “may” avoid a vehicular accident, but not pedestrians or cyclists, or police apparently. It’s fun and cute, but not realistic. We’re trying too hard to make this happen with no benefit at all.
@@paintup46 they're actually much better at seeing and avoiding pedestrians than human drivers.
You mean like the 2018 Uber Arizona kill because the engineers put a 8 seconds delay to ignore the false obstacle detection that created sudden breaks?
@@elenabob4953 About 20 pedestrians get killed everyday by human drivers if you add bicycles it's about 23. That's around ~7,500 people and another ~1000 bicyclists dead every year. The best you can point out is one death 5 and half years ago? Sounds really dangerous...
Hacking
Came upon a Waymo at a green light, it was just sitting there looking stupid, so I rammed it out of the way with my Ford Super Duty 350…I slept great that night.
Sure you did... not like they don't have a ton of cameras to see you and your plate. Cool story tough guy.
Waymo go stuck on the Street in Los Angeles already not safe
I honestly can't believe humans have become so stupid to believe driverless cars are a good idea. What ever happened to being proud of the vehicle you pay for with your hard work and wanting to drive it?? Crazy
What happened to elevator operators?
im so proud of my fellow humans with their DUIs and faces buried in their cell phones
These cars are not a good idea .
Elon Musk sold them this fairytale for more than 10 years.
That is a disingenuous comparaison and you know it.
Technology is great, however it can't adapt properly to mother nature. Self driving is stupid and dangerous.
So far statically it's been much less stupid and dangerous than human drivers.
Wtf does Mother Nature have to do with driving?
You just want to keep your robot in the cities no excuses?
This is so wrong. I don't want to be on the road with remotely controlled or AI self driving vehicles of any kind.. Trucks are not off the board. When these machines surround to have glitches and/or runs other cars of the road or stops on a freeway parking in heavy traffic during rush hours. 😮🤦♀️🎭🚮☠️ This is a public health hazard waiting to happen 😢🎭☠️
What if the car initially has been programmed to drop you off to a Starbucks few blocks from you, as you have requested it , but somehow the system of the vehicle flips out on you, locks all the doors and you end up being dropped out to San Francisco 😂?
There’s a button in the app and on the dash to end your ride, and you can also always hit another button to talk to Waymo customer service. They’re usually pretty good. Have you ever ridden in a Waymo?
@@danieldaniels7571
Not yet.
🤖
You can't be serious? Cars without drivers are LEGALLY running around on public streets? We already have hundreds of thousands of "smart phone" types running around causing accidents, and now there are cars on the streets with no drivers at all? I'm calling the AZ state legislature and making a complaint. Somebody needs to take action to prevent this. If they don't, these things need to be disabled somehow.
YEAH A HUMANS NEVER GET IN TRAFFIC JAMS ! AS USUAL 12 SPINS A NARRATIVE OF STUPID FOR THE STUPID. AND THIS INTURNS CREATES ANGER AGAINST A TECHNOLOGY THAT FOR THE MOST PART IS NEAR FLAWLESS.
its because ghost can manipulate technology and they dont f w this