I'm seriously thinking about getting one of these. I want to use it to shoot still life and portraits. I still have a Sunpak 522 that works perfectly, so I think that could be useful to shoot with, thankfully I have an 8' PC cord because I can't see holding the camera and the Sunpak. I used my dad's 500 long ago, that is my only experience with Hasselblad. I think that the main reason I want to get one of these is that it will force me to really concentrate on the shot. It's like putting the art back into the camera and not in the computer.
No Hasselblad X-Pan and H cameras are not rebranded Fuji gear. X-Pan and H1 were collaborations between the two brands Fuji and Hasselblad gave the X-Pan body and lens, design and manufacturing to Nittoh japan. The H1 body is a Hasselblad development, lenses without shutter developed and manufactured by Fuji. The leaf shutters within the lenses are made by Hasselblad in Sweden. Fuji went out of this collaboration after the H1 but continued the lens manufacturing for H cameras. Hasselblad continued the H series alone (H2 to H6, A6) and created his own digital backs after buying the danish Imacon company (specialist in scanners, digital backs and imaging software).
@jean-claudemuller3199 Thank you so mjch for sharing, it's very interesting! Sadly there's not that much to read about these cameras online, I would've loved to have some more information about when I made the video. I was kind of confused when I saw a Fuji branded "H1" beside the known T-X1.
I started my photo education with view cameras, Mamiya 6x7's, Yashicamat 124's, Bronicas and I must list, Hasselblads. I can understand why young photographers would find a "Blad" frustrating. Any camera has to be used and shot to where the controls become second nature. If the photographer struggles with the technology the same photographer has lost their vision. Hasselblads are or tend to be very specific tools of the trade. Commercial and studio work is what I use them for. Times when you are creating not recording, where everything is preconceived and is controlled. I have lusted for cameras for different reasons. I lusted for the Canon 1Ds in 2002 from the moment I put it to eye. I lusted for the Hasselblad for the undeniable image quality not its zippiness.
@nick-dm3if I'm working with the GFX 50S II right now and it's a complete different beast. Far more capable and usable. The lens selection is difficult, that's the only downside.
I HAVE ONE HasseI H3D 39, I BUY IN 2008, BUT THE SENSOR IS NOT THAT ONE, IT'S BIGER, even the body and prisma is different. There's not is not any noise neither those apertures on left side. If you want I can send you a photo from it. Any way, thanks for your fantastic video.
@automotivephoto Noted! 😉 I'm not into too scientific reviews because I personally don't care that much about, but comparing it to fullframe or the GFX system can be useful.
Du hast das Review sehr gut gemacht. Alle wichtigen Punkte dieses Panzers hast Du erklärt, aber….can it play angry birds?😂 Weiter so Brudi. Herzlichst…Der Bratan🫡😉
True- the H3D with the 39 back has a sensor size of 36,7 x 49,0 mm, the analogue film area of 6x4,5 is 56 x 41,5 mm. There is no true 56 x41,5 digital sensor. To my knowledge there is only one sensor which has a length of 56mm on the long side- That's the Leaf Aptus-II 10 with a size of 56x36mm.
@@yaaaaaaaannick Hello Yanick 🙂 sometimes im confused in this terminology cuz official specs sheets showing something different .For example Hasselblad H4D-60 or Phase One P65 on official specs sheets showing that Digital Backs cover full 645 format im not a expert i love photography i have H3DII_39 for me is superb tool i have lots of fun shoting with this system best regards tOm
@@sgroadie6367 not true. The sensor size of the IQ4 150 is 53.4x40mm. That's close to the "full frame" 645 format but not more. www.phaseone.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/IQ_Camera_System_Overview_Flyer.pdf
ich schreib jetzt einfach mal in deutsch, weil ic vermute dass du auch ein Schwabe bist.... Ja echt geil was du sagst. Ich versteh das voll. Ich hatte auch das Fuji-GFX-System, wurde aber nie richtig warm damit, da fehtle echt das feeling. Mittlerweile bin ich bei Leica M gelandet, hatte dummerweise die M8 viel zu schnell verkauft, obwohl ich mich wunderte dass ich mit der schönere Fotos als mit der GFX gemacht hatte. Dann kam die M9 mit der ich wirklich voll zufrieden war, bis mich das Internet verrückt gemacht hat wegen der "Korrosion" (na ja, eigenes Thema). Letztlich bin ich jetzt bei der M 240 die mir super gut gefällt und die werd ich vermutlich auch nicht mehr hergeben. Dennoch geht mir hatl der geile CCD-Sensor nicht aus dem Kopf. Datrum versteh ich voll und ganz was du sagst. Ich glaub ich muss zuschlagen. in den Kleinanzeigen verkauft gerade einer mit dem von dir beschriebenen Objektiv. Er will 2.300 € Ich denk für 2000€ schlag ich zu. Danke für das tolle review..... Andy aus der Ecke Weil der Stadt
Kodak also done some great job with early oly DSLRs too! I highly recommend anyone who love Kodak CCD look to try with E1, E300/500 and E400.
I'm seriously thinking about getting one of these. I want to use it to shoot still life and portraits. I still have a Sunpak 522 that works perfectly, so I think that could be useful to shoot with, thankfully I have an 8' PC cord because I can't see holding the camera and the Sunpak. I used my dad's 500 long ago, that is my only experience with Hasselblad.
I think that the main reason I want to get one of these is that it will force me to really concentrate on the shot. It's like putting the art back into the camera and not in the computer.
The H3D-39 goes up to ISO1600, but agree with you, it is not good above 200. Also, there is a HC100 which is f2.2.
No Hasselblad X-Pan and H cameras are not rebranded Fuji gear.
X-Pan and H1 were collaborations between the two brands
Fuji and Hasselblad gave the X-Pan body and lens, design and manufacturing to Nittoh japan.
The H1 body is a Hasselblad development, lenses without shutter developed and manufactured by Fuji. The leaf shutters within the lenses are made by Hasselblad in Sweden.
Fuji went out of this collaboration after the H1 but continued the lens manufacturing for H cameras. Hasselblad continued the H series alone (H2 to H6, A6) and created his own digital backs after buying the danish Imacon company (specialist in scanners, digital backs and imaging software).
@jean-claudemuller3199 Thank you so mjch for sharing, it's very interesting! Sadly there's not that much to read about these cameras online, I would've loved to have some more information about when I made the video. I was kind of confused when I saw a Fuji branded "H1" beside the known T-X1.
I started my photo education with view cameras, Mamiya 6x7's, Yashicamat 124's, Bronicas and I must list, Hasselblads. I can understand why young photographers would find a "Blad" frustrating. Any camera has to be used and shot to where the controls become second nature. If the photographer struggles with the technology the same photographer has lost their vision. Hasselblads are or tend to be very specific tools of the trade. Commercial and studio work is what I use them for. Times when you are creating not recording, where everything is preconceived and is controlled. I have lusted for cameras for different reasons. I lusted for the Canon 1Ds in 2002 from the moment I put it to eye. I lusted for the Hasselblad for the undeniable image quality not its zippiness.
For 200 more bucks i can get a gfx 50 but one of these would be fun
@nick-dm3if I'm working with the GFX 50S II right now and it's a complete different beast. Far more capable and usable. The lens selection is difficult, that's the only downside.
Is it possible to ask you about few raw files from it? Thank you
@gotcarspodcast7624 Of course, please write me an email on my website (moschokarfis.de) and I'll send you some!
I HAVE ONE HasseI H3D 39, I BUY IN 2008, BUT THE SENSOR IS NOT THAT ONE, IT'S BIGER, even the body and prisma is different. There's not is not any noise neither those apertures on left side. If you want I can send you a photo from it. Any way, thanks for your fantastic video.
Hi. We need more test shots. Compare videos. Some commercial work maybe. I wanna buy same as spare cam for art wow shots
What kind of comparison videos would you like to see?
@@dromokratis atmospheric feeling. Microcontrast. DR. Similar view angle lens side by side shots. Like 40 mm ff and 80mm mid format
@automotivephoto Noted! 😉 I'm not into too scientific reviews because I personally don't care that much about, but comparing it to fullframe or the GFX system can be useful.
@@dromokratis same here. I have a gfx 100s and canon r5. But hassy have a soul on my opinion. And i wanna buy it
Du hast das Review sehr gut gemacht. Alle wichtigen Punkte dieses Panzers hast Du erklärt, aber….can it play angry birds?😂
Weiter so Brudi. Herzlichst…Der Bratan🫡😉
Hasselblad with digital backs 22,39,50 was not a full 645 its a crop 1.1
True- the H3D with the 39 back has a sensor size of 36,7 x 49,0 mm, the analogue film area of 6x4,5 is 56 x 41,5 mm. There is no true 56 x41,5 digital sensor. To my knowledge there is only one sensor which has a length of 56mm on the long side- That's the Leaf Aptus-II 10 with a size of 56x36mm.
@@yaaaaaaaannick Hello Yanick 🙂 sometimes im confused in this terminology cuz official specs sheets showing something different .For example Hasselblad H4D-60 or Phase One P65 on official specs sheets showing that Digital Backs cover full 645 format im not a expert i love photography i have H3DII_39 for me is superb tool i have lots of fun shoting with this system best regards tOm
@@yaaaaaaaannickPhase One has full frame 56x40 sensor in IQ4 150.
@@sgroadie6367 not true. The sensor size of the IQ4 150 is 53.4x40mm. That's close to the "full frame" 645 format but not more.
www.phaseone.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/IQ_Camera_System_Overview_Flyer.pdf
ich schreib jetzt einfach mal in deutsch, weil ic vermute dass du auch ein Schwabe bist....
Ja echt geil was du sagst. Ich versteh das voll. Ich hatte auch das Fuji-GFX-System, wurde aber nie richtig warm damit, da fehtle echt das feeling.
Mittlerweile bin ich bei Leica M gelandet, hatte dummerweise die M8 viel zu schnell verkauft, obwohl ich mich wunderte dass ich mit der schönere Fotos als mit der GFX gemacht hatte.
Dann kam die M9 mit der ich wirklich voll zufrieden war, bis mich das Internet verrückt gemacht hat wegen der "Korrosion" (na ja, eigenes Thema).
Letztlich bin ich jetzt bei der M 240 die mir super gut gefällt und die werd ich vermutlich auch nicht mehr hergeben.
Dennoch geht mir hatl der geile CCD-Sensor nicht aus dem Kopf.
Datrum versteh ich voll und ganz was du sagst.
Ich glaub ich muss zuschlagen. in den Kleinanzeigen verkauft gerade einer mit dem von dir beschriebenen Objektiv. Er will 2.300 € Ich denk für 2000€ schlag ich zu.
Danke für das tolle review.....
Andy aus der Ecke Weil der Stadt
Spoiled? Seriously complaining about the weight?