Correct, Muppet Biden should never have attempted regime change in Moscow, he is very dumb/senile, impulsive and don't forget arrogant. Great observation.
Same rhetorics, we heard Russia only had washing machine chops and shovels to fight with, yet they are winning and taking "modern" western arms as sovernors.
Estimate are that 25% of the entire Russian military budget is stolen every year. We saw the request of that in the first days of the Ukraine war with vehicle break downs, carboard instead of reactive armor, etc. Ask yourself this question; If the commanders are willing to steal funds from conventional forces that are actually used in combat (14 wars since 1991). How much do you think they stole from the nuclear arsenal, as no one expects to actually use those weapons??? We witnessed a Chinese General get fired for stealing funds and filling the fuel tanks of ICBMs with water, as there was no money leftover for actual fuel. Russia likely has the same problems.
25% theft is actually better than Pentagon, which according to bookkeeping has literally lost trillions without a trace. Nobody sems to know where the trillions have gone, they're just not there.
@@xfactor6099 Good point bro ... shame you don't seem to understand that since YOU raised US military corruption, you're the one that's supposed to provide evidence showing It's similar to Russian ..... That's how adults making claims works once you're out of Kindergarten.
So the effective Russian military budget is what? 50B USD a year? Probably less? How comes Ukraine has received 100 Billion a year for the past 3 years and not able to do anything with such an insane amount of money?
100% agree! ruzzia has an antiquated force, using WWI style tactics and there's still fools on youtube arguing the mighty russian army. Ukraine will win. We need to let them use the weapons as they see fit for their defence.
@@chekeocha4923 If it can't defeat Ukraine how on earth would it defeat NATO ? If Nato went into Russia the first thing Putin would do is get in his private jet and flee, just like he did when Prighozin was on the march. He's a coward, full of bluster.
May be u r watching too much propaganda? Cos, Russian moment in the battlefield is increasing everyday, and your NATO trained, NATO armed, and NATO funded Ukraine armybis only abandoning position, each and every day.
Funny, but it doesn't matter whether the controls are fancy and digital. Whether the missiles launch and hit their target is all that matters. BTW, the US ICBMs are also in need of updating.
Russian 'Amateur Hour' theatrics. Low resolution late 20th century video assumed to be compelling evidence of Russian power but actually more akin to watching a Keystone Cops comedy from the silent movie era.
Is this how dellusional all of you are? What is it, Hubris of the vanquished? Cos, last time I checked, it's Ukraine who has no manpower left and areon contant retreat.
@@2012isnear-my-my-my I don't believe I call these 'old cylinders' Iskander missiles, that would be an unearned compliment. I said old video means old 'missile', ancient 'rocket' or something totally obsolete. The video reveals much: analogue gauges, wired microphones, and soviet-like generic uniforms. The fact they featured a 70 years old TU95 as one of their delivery platforms, resonates well with dumb Russians who believe the Russian Federation is still a world power.
@@gregash7683 arguing with people like you is same as wrestling with the pig in a mud after a while you realize that he's enjoying it . good luck and dont come back
It was never realistic to believe that the Russian military, alone among every other Russian institution, was competently led, financed, and in working order.
I truly thought it was a joke when I watched it 😂. I thought it was Ukrainian propaganda making fun of the Russians! This was a “serious” threat from Russia?!?!🤣🤣🤣🤣
I mean, the Topol M is quite formidable, but so are any western ICBMs, really...goes both ways and putin knows it too. Noone's scared of him anymore, and he cant stand that.
This is Topol M, typically equipped with a 550 kT yield nuclear warhead. Make a difference here for a change and read up on all this stuff noone appears to know what they are babbling about.
Russian citizens lives in the old times. Perhaps in the beginning of 1930. I mean in their feeling and thinking of themselves from own propaganda. Year in year out they get they are the best country on this planet. Its used by many dictator countries.
Why? No seriously why? Ukraine government was and still is one of the most corrupt governments on the planet, Russian citizens on the whole had a much better level of living then those in the Ukraine. Then there is what's going to happen in the Ukraine after it's over..mass influx of Muslim just like the rest of Europe and all the criminal actions there going to do and have ' protected ' status they will get. Homosexuals and gender-confused flooding in,basically the Ukraine is going to get hit with a liberal bat. I understand why Putin did what he did and why I definitely don't agree with the how.
Was the UK trident launch a threat to Russia? No it wasn't it was a long planned test of a nuclear deterrent as countries with such weapons regularly do.
You should very well be scared, nuclear war is a real and terrifying possibility, it’s seriously NOT a joke ! We are on the verge of the end of the world at the rate tensions are increasing
And then the day comes we get vaporized then what? What is up with you people acting like it could never happen? You really want to chance it? Alot people act like nuclear weapons are a fairytale
No one has a nuclear arsenal newer than the 80s. Mr I'm an expert doesn't even know what an icbm is. Thinks this is an Iskander truck. He's embarrassed himself in front of the world. The UK doesn't have mobile ICBM launchers on standby in the forests at all times like Russia does. It doesn't even have a forest.
@@Jamie-cc1vw You Uk based propaganda guys and this guy that's trying to convince the low iq public that everything is safe and well are a joke. You aren't fooling me and I think the only thing this guy is expert in is drinking spirits before breakfast. He's said at least 20 falsities and has no idea what he's looking at. I'm Australian and I'm very happy my family no longer reside within such a dumb population as the Uk has become.
End this war, ha? This year alone, NATO has sent ~$150B in arms and ammunition. The result is, nearly 80% of them are Kaput. And Ukraine is constantly being routed.
@@aniksamiurrahman6365 Still is not nato send the resources. It's up to every country. The economic support on the other hand is handle trought EU at global level in some cases.
@@mickearrow8035 If u kindly read NATO constitution, it doesn't enforce to do anything more. In fact, even Article 5 doesn't promise anything more than what Ukraine already getting. As for financial support - NATO + Japan & S.Korea doesn't evan makeup 20% of the globe. U guys don't represent the globe. So, don't call it global support. Call it what it is - NATO + a few more American alley.
@@mickearrow8035 Sure. All the planning was done in Ramstein, in all NATO memeber meeting. It's still not NATO tho. How else NATO save their face, that they are losing their only war with Russia?
Old Russian electronics used valve technology instead of transistors because of EMP issues, and valve electronics needs maintenance, which russians are NOT good at, so these old nuclear systems are probably useless by now.
@@rygyouwill5293 I don't think the people watching this are a bunch of sheep , but I do think the Russian military are a bunch of sheep . Why else would they march to their death in a foreign land . All for one man's ego...
True! But I watched an American retired silo” and it was old tech as well. Can’t speak to valve or transistors.. But the idea was.. it was cut off from the internet. Using analog tech. Assured there was no glitches or hacks that could happen
Here’s one thought to ponder. ‘How well maintained are the Russian missiles? So, armed with the knowledge that there’s been a lack of funding within the Russian infrastructure, does this also relate to the military? So, will the missiles actually work and take off?’
So, what would be a answer suitable to your microscopic degenerate wishfull thinking? ;) Okay here it is for you: Of course no Russian nukes work! You are fabulous and should sleep well tonight!
The minuteman 3 is relatively new and up to date with its technological build, it is due to be replaced by Sentinel in 2029 The Abrams is a 70's tank but there are about 14 variations of it with the SEP3 having modern systems in it including APS. The F15 is a 60's air supremacy fighter but the new F15 EX is a modern system which uses the most modern weapon systems and electronic warfare. The F16C's Ukraine got are old Block 30's and they absolutely owned the Russian SU35, the F16D Block 60 or F16 I Block 52 is a 60's design that is better than anything Russia has, and it is not even close. A war between the US and Russia is a blood bath.
The only people I’m aware of that remain fearful of nuclear conflict are the casual observers who aren’t really paying attention anyway. So long as our media does not assist the Kremlin through their own sensationalising of stories, then I’d hope it is accepted by mostly intelligent minds that it’s all projection and bluff.
IS NOT. The neutron source decays, having short half life and every so many years the warhead must be dismantled, new source inserted.... All in all a LOT of work and money. IF you don't do this , even if you can deliver the warhead, you will get a firecracker and some contamination, while the US warheads WILL work. And Russian KNOW this.
He is absolutely correct when he says Russia needs to lose or the west will be in a pickle. So, I am much more concerned of the fact that we are not helping Ukraine win.
@@justint7460 At least they missed the sub when they fell down beside it.. Could have been worse. As far as I know there's never been an ICBM fail to launch off one of these Topol launchers and they have been tested for 40 years now. They only have 100 of them so a failed launch wouldn't be ideal
There's a lot of military aircraft still in service with the US that don't have glass cockpits or are still in the queue to be upgraded, and in the UK and many other NATO forces the situation is likely the same. Just because something appears old or outdated, it does not mean that it is not functional or effective. Would De Bretton Gordon play around with and treat WWI UXO with contempt? If someone loaded a flintlock musket and pointed it at him and fired, would he be able to laugh it off and walk away? Russia's tactics, training and equipment may all very well be substandard, but when you're on the receiving end of it, it is a serious matter.
Absolutely agree, there are plenty of functioning old analogue military & civil systems still in use around the world. Many wars have been about fielding numbers, not advanced technology, for a self proposed "expert" I found this very misleading. NASA got to the moon on analogue systems, in fact wire "rope" was the core of the computer systems on board.
@sethsalberg3678 'Not configured' to carry nukes is intriguing. I suspect many models of coalition military aircraft are readily capable of carrying and deploying nuclear weapons, even aircraft such as the P-8. If the need arises, the weapons will be adapted to the hardpoints or racks quickly.
As someone working in aviation, I can say that there’s no such thing as an “old aircraft.” If it’s in good condition, especially a bomber, which doesn’t require exceptional maneuverability, then even if it’s 50 years old, it will remain just as effective and reliable with proper maintenance
This former flyer in the VietNam war agrees. In 1968 he was flying L/19s/O1E-O1G Birddogs. My A/C was made in 1948. The BirdDog was the first all metal A/C ordered after WW02. The L/19s are still in service in 2024 with other USA allies
Watching these vids I am to think that Russia is about to lose the war. When I listen to the Dutch generals, Russia is moving on nicely with huge costs of life, but still moving on nicely. Donbas, Kurks... Ukraine is just not doing too well.
How effective is a 1960s car, truck, or aircraft that has had zero maintenance. And is in a wet hole in the ground? Even if it works it’s still 1960s performance or less.
He is, but he is surround by people who will give him truthfull professional advise without any fear of falling out of a window if they "upset" him. That's a very important difference.
Russia has changed little in its geopolitical strategy since 1990. The fact that so many people do not travel and go abroad is a huge debilitating factor for the country. The fact that they are fed a steady diet of nationalistic propaganda with no outside options in the 21st century is almost unfathomable for a European group of individuals living within Russia..
@@kevinrobb86 If they’re old, they won’t reach their targets. As soon as these assets were commissioned, the countermeasures would have been developed. You could liken it to an F1 car from 1984 trying to compete on today’s grid. In military terms, they really are an analog threat to a digital defence system.
@@aexetanius 1st launch was successful, last THREE ? Well they've "successfully" dug big holes in the ground. The last one is on the satellite picture...
Russia has a mix of old and latest missiles, this analyst is scared and in denial. He should tell us how Russia how is destroying targets in Ukraine then. There are advantages of having old equipment in your arsenal. It's like cars - manual versus automatic. If you think you are better equipped because you are driving an automatic, you will be in for some surprises.
If..I...an American Stay at home mom......burst out laughing at Putin's video because of their obsolete equipment....I'm sure the rest of American citizens are not worried either
What is he using next to frighten us...a nuke throwing Trebuchet.....and to the Russian trolls...we have nukes too and the chance that ours work is pretty high
Thanks Hamish, haven't had a laugh like this since the Monty Pythons fish slapping skit, last time I saw that style of cockpit dials was on our VC10 G-ARVJ, oh, and it was a bit similar to the Westland Whirlwind we operated🤣🤣
@@biloki3079 Trust me as a man who once was accept to join the UK Navy as sonar operator on the Astute class. This man is a liar, Do not believe the lies from the UK media
Funny how most nasa missions today use Russian rockets, and the us and uk have yet to successfully develop hypersonics yet were supposed to believe their far behind us
Lol, Russia launched as part of it's contribution to the ISS & even then NASA had to cover part of the launch costs. Those days are over by the way Roscosmos is toast they lost NASA, ESA & western commercial contracts due to the Ukraine war which were the only thing keeping Russia's space program afloat. As for Hypersonic's they're just Soviet era ballistic missiles repurposed to attack ground targets & they have been around since the 1960's. A poor mans hypersonic other world powers don't use them because they don't offer anything over supersonics yet cost 10X the price. Western supplied air defences in Ukraine have had no problem intercepting them Putin's wonder weapon is Kremlin propaganda. Real Hypersonics being developed by the West use exotic power sources & can hit hypersonic speeds at low atmosphere with no need to slow down they would be near impossible to stop.
@ZuulGatekeeper funny roscomos just launched nasa astronaut into space in September, so it would seem like the days of nasa relying mostly on Russia are far from over. Also, I'd like to ask what ballistic rockets they were repurposed from exactly? Are you suggesting russia has had airlaunch hypersonic since the 60s because that would just suggest they are light years ahead of the us. And what is this exotic power source you speak of? So far, the only ones the us has developed are too large to mount to jets and have to be deployed from a b52 and still can't achieve half the speed of a Kinzhal. And you really believe Ukraine shot 1 down when they struggle with lotterying drones from Iran? Who shot it down the ghost of keiv?
@@deason2365 These are the last launches paid for by NASA it has not renewed the contract with Roscosmos & Russia has to honor them or it's own astronauts will be stuck on the ISS as Dragon is set to return them. As said Russia's hypersonics are just ballistic missiles capabilities developed during the Cold War but not used by other world powers simply because they offer nothing but time to target at the expense of detection & increased cost. The Kinzhal is simply an air-launched long range ballistic missile. Even it's short range Zircon missiles have fallen far short of Kremlin claims Ukraine’s Western supplied air defences have proven the ability to intercept entire volley's of them the missile’s alleged unstoppable super weapon myth is just Kremlin propaganda.
@ZuulGatekeeper russia isn't the one with astronauts stuck on the iss rn, and would have zero problem retreving their astronauts, nasa on the other hand can not function or opperate period without roscosmos. nasa will continue to pay roscomos to send their astronauts to space for the foreseeable future because they have and always will be far more efficient. Nasa has been begging russian not to leave the iss program before 2030 not the other way around like you try to insinuate. As far as your claim of having these rockets since the cold war I have to ask do you even know how they work, like the basics? Because the first successful scramjet was made in the 90s, how do you repurpose something that doesn't exist yet? Would be like saying the germans repurposed bf-109 to make the me-262. As far as downing volleys, Ukraine claims to have shot down more then russia had even launched and the us has even dismissed all but one claim and even the details surrounding the one claim Washington confirmed is dubious. And the patriot system that was said to have downed it was destroyed in the strike involving the hypersonic and the us even suggested that Ukraine shouldn't attempt too shoot them down with patriot missiles because they had launched volleys of patriot missiles in the attempt to down the one costing ukrainian air defense dearly in resources. And you still haven't told me what the exotic power source the us possess is
@ZuulGatekeeper russia isn't the one with astronauts stuck on the iss rn, and would have zero problem retreving their astronauts, nasa on the other hand can not function or opperate period without roscosmos. nasa will continue to pay roscomos to send their astronauts to space for the foreseeable future because they have and always will be far more efficient. Nasa is beging russian not to leave the iss program before 2030 not the other way around like you try to insinuate. As far as your claim of having these rockets since the cold war I have to ask do you even know how they work, like the basics? Because the first successful scramjet was made in the 90s how do you repurpose a jet engine that doesn't exist? Would be like saying the germans repurposed bf-109 to make the me-262. As far as downing volleys, Ukraine claims to have shot down more then russia had launched and the us has even dismissed all but one claim and even the details surrounding the one claim Washington confirmed is dubious. And the patriot system that was said to have downed it was destroyed in the strike involving the hypersonic and the us even suggested that Ukraine shouldn't attempt too shoot them down with patriot missiles because they had launched volleys of patriot missiles in the attempt to down the one costing ukrainian air defense dearly in resources. And you still haven't told me what the exotic magical power source the us posses, is?
@@goonerboz6023 A 3 Week Special Exercise that's over 3 Years old isn't a win. Russia has lost land, and putin is losing control because the Ukrainians are striking close to Moscow. Russian Mothers are demonstrating because putin's Army needs another mass mobilization. Did you get Your notice Ivan?
None of these missles has a nuclear warhead on it when they are being launched in drills. They have thousands of warhead, both tactical nukes and strategic nukes. But we can hope he isn't or at least his generals aren't idiotic enough to use them.
The stopwatch - with date function and a neat compass - is currently wholesale at $2 per, so long as you go over 150 units. Gotta love that cutting edge technology....
![ILLSLICK - KILLSHOT REMIX [FULL VERSION]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/RIK8RrqIAzE/mqdefault.jpg)
Americans like to think its a button, that must be pressed. We'd likely, all be upset to know that in Russian, it's a string, that has to be pulled.
Which replaced the chain that rusted away decades ago.
Or a DAB of organophosphate nerve poison on a door knocker eh?
No man, they use a match to light the fuse because someone stole the lighter 🙄 😂😂.
...and a can on the other end
😂😂😂
Being dumb and impulsive are not a good combo. From the playground to political figures.
I wonder if that searing insight has been shared with Putin yet?
Correct, Muppet Biden should never have attempted regime change in Moscow, he is very dumb/senile, impulsive and don't forget arrogant. Great observation.
he wasn't impulsive until US stepped on his pipes
Sounds like you are talking about Democrats.
That's right. Obummer and Biden started that coup in 2014. That whole mess is is the democrats fault.
I remember Borat boasting about the fearsome capability of his nations catapults. Art imitating life i suppose.
How much better a catapult is compared to a Trident? And yes I am talking about the UK Trident, not the Greek Trident 😂😂😂😂😂
@toto-yf8tc true. At least a catapult can probably fire two rocks in a row without the rocks failing.
Same rhetorics, we heard Russia only had washing machine chops and shovels to fight with, yet they are winning and taking "modern" western arms as sovernors.
Borat is a Kazakhstani !!!
😂😂😂
Estimate are that 25% of the entire Russian military budget is stolen every year. We saw the request of that in the first days of the Ukraine war with vehicle break downs, carboard instead of reactive armor, etc. Ask yourself this question; If the commanders are willing to steal funds from conventional forces that are actually used in combat (14 wars since 1991). How much do you think they stole from the nuclear arsenal, as no one expects to actually use those weapons??? We witnessed a Chinese General get fired for stealing funds and filling the fuel tanks of ICBMs with water, as there was no money leftover for actual fuel. Russia likely has the same problems.
And what are the stolen estimates of USA military budget?
25% theft is actually better than Pentagon, which according to bookkeeping has literally lost trillions without a trace. Nobody sems to know where the trillions have gone, they're just not there.
Slightly different the contractors price gouge the Pentagon, but generals don't steal soldiers wages or deny casualties .
@@xfactor6099
Good point bro ... shame you don't seem to understand that since YOU raised US military corruption, you're the one that's supposed to provide evidence showing It's similar to Russian ..... That's how adults making claims works once you're out of Kindergarten.
So the effective Russian military budget is what? 50B USD a year? Probably less? How comes Ukraine has received 100 Billion a year for the past 3 years and not able to do anything with such an insane amount of money?
YES, Fully agree with the analysis.
Russia needs to understand, it’s not got a chance against NATO
Yes, as we see in Ukraine
LOL..Really ?
100% agree! ruzzia has an antiquated force, using WWI style tactics and there's still fools on youtube arguing the mighty russian army. Ukraine will win. We need to let them use the weapons as they see fit for their defence.
@@chekeocha4923 If it can't defeat Ukraine how on earth would it defeat NATO ? If Nato went into Russia the first thing Putin would do is get in his private jet and flee, just like he did when Prighozin was on the march. He's a coward, full of bluster.
He is saying that this missiles are paper missiles I don't think so . Even with big missiles can cause destruction.
Thank you Times Radio and Commander De Bretton Gordon for such an interesting, informative and detailed presentation.
Thak you for lies
He is a funny chap with no credible proof of anything, who as you can see reads too many fiction books.
@@SIMEONNOVAK Fake nick of ciaroybean is in line with fake video of fake media. Presstitutes at work.
It looks like a cold war video, from the 70's/80's and maybe Putin is watching too much DR. Who shows?
We are in a Cold War With The Russians & Chinese Now
May be u r watching too much propaganda? Cos, Russian moment in the battlefield is increasing everyday, and your NATO trained, NATO armed, and NATO funded Ukraine armybis only abandoning position, each and every day.
Funny, but it doesn't matter whether the controls are fancy and digital. Whether the missiles launch and hit their target is all that matters. BTW, the US ICBMs are also in need of updating.
Times radio shot that footage. It cost 5x more than their experts are worth
@raymondthorn3678 im not an ophthalmologist, or jesus. Cant help your vision or lack thereof
Russian 'Amateur Hour' theatrics. Low resolution late 20th century video assumed to be compelling evidence of Russian power but actually more akin to watching a Keystone Cops comedy from the silent movie era.
Is this how dellusional all of you are? What is it, Hubris of the vanquished? Cos, last time I checked, it's Ukraine who has no manpower left and areon contant retreat.
your another "expert" i bet. thats not an Iskander. thats a mobile intercontinental ballistic missile.boy o boy.
@@2012isnear-my-my-my I don't believe I call these 'old cylinders' Iskander missiles, that would be an unearned compliment. I said old video means old 'missile', ancient 'rocket' or something totally obsolete. The video reveals much: analogue gauges, wired microphones, and soviet-like generic uniforms. The fact they featured a 70 years old TU95 as one of their delivery platforms, resonates well with dumb Russians who believe the Russian Federation is still a world power.
@@gregash7683 arguing with people like you is same as wrestling with the pig in a mud after a while you realize that he's enjoying it . good luck and dont come back
It was never realistic to believe that the Russian military, alone among every other Russian institution, was competently led, financed, and in working order.
I truly thought it was a joke when I watched it 😂. I thought it was Ukrainian propaganda making fun of the Russians! This was a “serious” threat from Russia?!?!🤣🤣🤣🤣
yes, these can make your tiny island underwater
@@alnstn1430 Solovyov, Is that you?
@@alnstn1430 Using a stopwatch to launch your missiles 😂😂🤡🤡
That cheap stopwatch straight from China cracked me up!
Read up on Topol M.
Russia displaying their new Steampunk designed weapons.
I mean, the Topol M is quite formidable, but so are any western ICBMs, really...goes both ways and putin knows it too. Noone's scared of him anymore, and he cant stand that.
Better Country than the United States run by Harris and Biden.
This is Topol M, typically equipped with a 550 kT yield nuclear warhead. Make a difference here for a change and read up on all this stuff noone appears to know what they are babbling about.
Half of Russia doesn’t even have adequate plumbing. How they fancy themselves a 1st world nation is laughable.
Russia is a second world nation and it’s always been like that
Putin is hopelessly out of date (typical narcissist)
If Putin was more up to date then he would have more up to date Tanks and Aircraft right ? but is he just using Old stock NO
Empires are hopelessly narcissistic and EXTREAMLY poppular, causing an internal demographic collapse.
@@David-hi9rplike that 5th gen SU57 that's no better than an F22. That's out of date.
And he is doing very well in Ukraine despite all this sort of nonesense and very obvous propoganda
They will send you an RS-28 Sarmat for breakfast, if you are illiterate, smoke it
Russia is ridiculous
@@Peter-lb8pv why in your estimation is Russia ridiculous?
..ridiculously effective on the battlefield these days.
@@FrancoisMouton-iu7jt if you have to ask this it means you are an oblivious fool
@@micaiahm1Yeah, whatever Ivan. 😂😂😂
Effective in using human life as fodder to save their 90s at best technology...@@micaiahm1
Just shows you how frightened putin really is
😂 yeah he's terrified!!!!that's why he's winning in Ukraine (Mr I believe everything I read 😂)
😂 frightened 😂...he's basically taken over a massive piece of a country
Putin has studied idiotolagy !
Frightened? If he was scared, he would withdraw from Ukraine given western pressure.
Just shows you how propaganda makes you all feel cozy.
Let putin and joe on the square fight 😂
The russian videos have colors at least. - Love the baby-blue pyjamas. Slava Ukraini!
Dont be desparate, but how you can survive so high 1,5 mil losses???
@@Bynk333 Get over yourself !
Russia has shown how weak and pathetic it is.
I feel sorry for the citizens.
Was that footage from 1984😅😅
Isn't it a February 2024 Trident test?
@toto-yf8tc knowing the russians it's a try anything test !
@@ChristyBermingham 1984, maybe. To me it looks like the footage the Soviets released in the late 1980s. It could be 1984 as well.
@@larsrons7937 I really think it could be the 80s !
You make it sound like 1984 is last century or something
If Russia thinks we will be convinced by that old chestnut, well they still think we are living in the 80's.
Russian citizens lives in the old times. Perhaps in the beginning of 1930. I mean in their feeling and thinking of themselves from own propaganda. Year in year out they get they are the best country on this planet. Its used by many dictator countries.
What is NATO waiting for to attack Russia?
Russia dont have Widescreen tvs yet LOL
@@David-hi9rpthey make TV
@@cristianmartinezlugo3463 no one sane makes war on Russia .Draw the appropriate conclusion.
Thank you for your analysis. Continued support for 🇺🇦 is essential. Ukraine must prevail.
Why? No seriously why? Ukraine government was and still is one of the most corrupt governments on the planet, Russian citizens on the whole had a much better level of living then those in the Ukraine.
Then there is what's going to happen in the Ukraine after it's over..mass influx of Muslim just like the rest of Europe and all the criminal actions there going to do and have ' protected ' status they will get. Homosexuals and gender-confused flooding in,basically the Ukraine is going to get hit with a liberal bat.
I understand why Putin did what he did and why I definitely don't agree with the how.
Yes, yes. Ukraine should Prevail and your pathetic brain too 😂
😂Go on the frontlines and help them.
SLAVA UKRAINE!!!!
What difference does it make? Who cares who wins
More threats from Russia.... 🥱
Puty and his best-friend fatboy babylord Kim Jong Un and his army of scarecrows.
Was the UK trident launch a threat to Russia? No it wasn't it was a long planned test of a nuclear deterrent as countries with such weapons regularly do.
Must be a day that ends with "Y"...
Just my thought. Maybe that sort of stuff is good for watching just before going to sleep? It's the most boring I can think off. 🥱😴
- don't poke the bear...
The more Putin does this the more certain it is he has to go.
Just goes to show that the Communist way of life does not work It didnt work in Germany after WW2 and the west moved on
Not a chance. You Globalists are finished.
Putin forgot the west got nukes too?
Yes, and ours will work
RAS-PUTIN wouldn't be able to launch his nukes before they are destroyed over RUSSIA
Putin is a clown
A former KGB clown
That clown made a joke out of the west
@@bryandimery6509lol Never did he ever!
The problem is that Biden is even more of one. REMOVE THOSE DAMN RESTRICTIONS AGAINST UKRAINE!!!!!!!!!
@ his former KGB coworkers said he was unremarkable
not scared. they didn't show the ones that failed to launch. 🤣
Or the fancy new tank that broke down in Red Square during a parade.....
You should very well be scared, nuclear war is a real and terrifying possibility, it’s seriously NOT a joke ! We are on the verge of the end of the world at the rate tensions are increasing
I love how it's 1980's missile tech
@@Brian-om2hhthe driver damaged the brakes because He didn't know how to operate the tank
@glintongordon6811 that's what you get when you blew through all your real soldiers in the first year of combat.
He threatening us with 80s vibes..sounds fun
Time to play some Vice City and listen to Scorpions wind of change :D
Yeah give us the 80s Music anyday LOL
😂
They can play one of trump's favorite songs.... "YMCA."
b52 till 2050?
in other news, after the T34 tanks are destroyed, Putin plans to re-commission museum cannons from the 1800s.
🤣🤣🤣🤣
T36
In reality tho, almost entire Europe is out of artillery or armor! And also jobs.
@@aniksamiurrahman6365um, no. Don’t believe your Russian propaganda.
What's next....cossacks on horseback?
Did they dig that video up from the 80s? It looks like it. It's like crying wolf but the wolf is too old to do much.
Pootins bluffing theatre. 🙄
Heard that a lot before Feb 2022...
@petervojcek7043 And two and a half years later, we've been shown there's not exactly a lot to fear.
And then the day comes we get vaporized then what? What is up with you people acting like it could never happen? You really want to chance it? Alot people act like nuclear weapons are a fairytale
@@sonofjack6286 you SHOULD fear war .Especially if some Western pro-Ukraine analysis says there isnt.
@@sonofjack6286 Oreshnik
Looks late 80's
No one has a nuclear arsenal newer than the 80s. Mr I'm an expert doesn't even know what an icbm is. Thinks this is an Iskander truck. He's embarrassed himself in front of the world. The UK doesn't have mobile ICBM launchers on standby in the forests at all times like Russia does. It doesn't even have a forest.
@@Jasonsadventures hahahahaha. the kremlin paying you by the word i take it?
@@Jamie-cc1vw You Uk based propaganda guys and this guy that's trying to convince the low iq public that everything is safe and well are a joke. You aren't fooling me and I think the only thing this guy is expert in is drinking spirits before breakfast. He's said at least 20 falsities and has no idea what he's looking at. I'm Australian and I'm very happy my family no longer reside within such a dumb population as the Uk has become.
@@Jamie-cc1vw Not yet, been waiting 20 years for a contract, how did you get yours
@@Jasonsadventurespathetic Russian troll
It's time to call Putin's big bluff? to end this dreadful war
End this war, ha? This year alone, NATO has sent ~$150B in arms and ammunition. The result is, nearly 80% of them are Kaput. And Ukraine is constantly being routed.
@@aniksamiurrahman6365
Still is not nato send the resources. It's up to every country. The economic support on the other hand is handle trought EU at global level in some cases.
@@mickearrow8035 If u kindly read NATO constitution, it doesn't enforce to do anything more. In fact, even Article 5 doesn't promise anything more than what Ukraine already getting.
As for financial support - NATO + Japan & S.Korea doesn't evan makeup 20% of the globe. U guys don't represent the globe. So, don't call it global support. Call it what it is - NATO + a few more American alley.
And if it's not bluff ?
@@mickearrow8035 Sure. All the planning was done in Ramstein, in all NATO memeber meeting. It's still not NATO tho. How else NATO save their face, that they are losing their only war with Russia?
Old Russian electronics used valve technology instead of transistors because of EMP issues, and valve electronics needs maintenance, which russians are NOT good at, so these old nuclear systems are probably useless by now.
Would you bet your life and the lives of everyone eles on that?
@@robertwallace4515 don't bother with these ppl, this is bunch of sheep sniffing each other's back and telling boogie man isn't real
@@rygyouwill5293 I don't think the people watching this are a bunch of sheep , but I do think the Russian military are a bunch of sheep . Why else would they march to their death in a foreign land . All for one man's ego...
I think everyone by now knows that the real boogie man is NATO, including the Russians. They should act accordingly.
True! But I watched an American retired silo” and it was old tech as well. Can’t speak to valve or transistors.. But the idea was.. it was cut off from the internet. Using analog tech. Assured there was no glitches or hacks that could happen
Here’s one thought to ponder. ‘How well maintained are the Russian missiles? So, armed with the knowledge that there’s been a lack of funding within the Russian infrastructure, does this also relate to the military? So, will the missiles actually work and take off?’
@@timallsopp8656 check out, budy
some will still work.
Of course not. They were looted and sold decades ago.
So, what would be a answer suitable to your microscopic degenerate wishfull thinking? ;) Okay here it is for you: Of course no Russian nukes work! You are fabulous and should sleep well tonight!
Totally agree - great to hear a sober and considered assessment - thank you Sir!
How old is the B-52? The Minuteman? The Abrams? F-15? I could go on.
And who are you, ivan? You are the worlds enemy
Concepts of upgrading and maintenance are alien
All of which are evidence of our superior engineering and system of government
The minuteman 3 is relatively new and up to date with its technological build, it is due to be replaced by Sentinel in 2029
The Abrams is a 70's tank but there are about 14 variations of it with the SEP3 having modern systems in it including APS.
The F15 is a 60's air supremacy fighter but the new F15 EX is a modern system which uses the most modern weapon systems and electronic warfare.
The F16C's Ukraine got are old Block 30's and they absolutely owned the Russian SU35, the F16D Block 60 or F16 I Block 52 is a 60's design that is better than anything Russia has, and it is not even close.
A war between the US and Russia is a blood bath.
@@sr9587 Russia are upgrading 60's era with 70's technology lol
The embarrassing thing is, our Weak Western Leaders are frightened and they all need to seriously grow a set
Or maybe they know the real story... lol
Just because Putler is willing to get millions to die for him. Don't mean the democratic world wants the same for their civilians.
Here here
Art of war. Make the enemy think you are incapable of striking when you are.
The only people I’m aware of that remain fearful of nuclear conflict are the casual observers who aren’t really paying attention anyway. So long as our media does not assist the Kremlin through their own sensationalising of stories, then I’d hope it is accepted by mostly intelligent minds that it’s all projection and bluff.
Try watching one of Dr Ted Postol 's informative videos before you draw any important conclusions.
That Out of date Russian equipment is beating the Modern US and NATO equipment. Looks like shovels and washing machine chips are the best!
Just delusional bot propaganda. Russian turrets fly a long way!😅😅😅😅😅😅😅
A bomb is a bomb.... no matter what year it's created.
IS NOT. The neutron source decays, having short half life and every so many years the warhead must be dismantled, new source inserted....
All in all a LOT of work and money. IF you don't do this , even if you can deliver the warhead, you will get a firecracker and some contamination, while the US warheads WILL work.
And Russian KNOW this.
He is absolutely correct when he says Russia needs to lose or the west will be in a pickle.
So, I am much more concerned of the fact that we are not helping Ukraine win.
How "bout", 50's?
@@francislong5114 K???
@@benjones4365
Lol Russia beats you hard
C’mon, at least mention early the missile exercise that exploded in the silo.
And yet nobody talked about American Minuteman III’s still using 50 year old technology.
Wow russia actually got a cbm off the launch pad 😳😂🇺🇲🇺🇦💙
There's a blooper reel for that launch video, though 😂😂😂
How did the UK get on with the Trident testing... lol
Uk don’t make statements to bomb the world flat ain’t it?
@@justint7460 At least they missed the sub when they fell down beside it.. Could have been worse. As far as I know there's never been an ICBM fail to launch off one of these Topol launchers and they have been tested for 40 years now. They only have 100 of them so a failed launch wouldn't be ideal
Putin needs to man up and do the decent thing.....Resign his position...and call for free and fair democratic elections.
You’re Dreaming 😂
lol like in the west ? how dumb are you?
No sharpshooters in Moscow
What like zelensky ? the unelected scrounging clown. 😂
😂
Hey Putin…The 60s are calling they want their military hardware back…Laughs 😅…
Scene from the 80’s movie spy’s like us - haha
LOL laughed my head off
Hmmm...definitely FALCON AND THE SNOWMAN vibes!!!
1:41 That stopwatch is $3.67 usd each on amazon if you get a 6 pack lol.
Actually it was $ 5.99 canadian, so I guess we have the same one. Did you get the Nuclear Missile as well ?
Russia is so sad...
I disagree, I find the ruSSians very funny creatures. Their bluff and bluster keeps me laughing.
@@gerryhouska2859 hmm, that is the more "sunny" way to see it, thanks for brightening up my morning! :)
Putin needs to read the kids book "The boy who cried Wolf".
Ask yourself who manufactured the engines for the space rocket that goes to the international space station,you got it
You mean that old stuff from the seventies, that SpaceX turned into museum pieces ?
You need to use Google more...
There’s a saying for this ‘smoke and mirrors’
Or bullsh*t and bluster...
Classic pootin crying nuke
Let me guess: the weapons which were supposed to be there "disappeared." Ha, ha, ha ha ha 😂 🤣 😆 😄 😀 😜 😂
This channel is proof TH-cam has no problem with certain mis and disinformation
I'm not sure that being hit by an ancient nuclear weapon is in any way preferable to being hit by a brand new weapon.
I thought them nukes had a shelf life, kinda like most groceries. Leave em in the silos too long and all they go is pop instead of boom.
There's a lot of military aircraft still in service with the US that don't have glass cockpits or are still in the queue to be upgraded, and in the UK and many other NATO forces the situation is likely the same. Just because something appears old or outdated, it does not mean that it is not functional or effective.
Would De Bretton Gordon play around with and treat WWI UXO with contempt? If someone loaded a flintlock musket and pointed it at him and fired, would he be able to laugh it off and walk away?
Russia's tactics, training and equipment may all very well be substandard, but when you're on the receiving end of it, it is a serious matter.
Absolutely agree, there are plenty of functioning old analogue military & civil systems still in use around the world. Many wars have been about fielding numbers, not advanced technology, for a self proposed "expert" I found this very misleading. NASA got to the moon on analogue systems, in fact wire "rope" was the core of the computer systems on board.
US B52s still have analog gauges, but I believe they aren't configured to carry nukes anymore.
@sethsalberg3678 'Not configured' to carry nukes is intriguing. I suspect many models of coalition military aircraft are readily capable of carrying and deploying nuclear weapons, even aircraft such as the P-8. If the need arises, the weapons will be adapted to the hardpoints or racks quickly.
As someone working in aviation, I can say that there’s no such thing as an “old aircraft.” If it’s in good condition, especially a bomber, which doesn’t require exceptional maneuverability, then even if it’s 50 years old, it will remain just as effective and reliable with proper maintenance
This former flyer in the VietNam war agrees. In 1968 he was flying L/19s/O1E-O1G Birddogs. My A/C was made in 1948. The BirdDog was the first all metal A/C ordered after WW02. The L/19s are still in service in 2024 with other USA allies
Watching these vids I am to think that Russia is about to lose the war. When I listen to the Dutch generals, Russia is moving on nicely with huge costs of life, but still moving on nicely. Donbas, Kurks... Ukraine is just not doing too well.
It doesn't matter if the weapons are outdated. What matters is their effectiveness.
What matters is maintenance of these weapon systems.
Outdated actually means their effectiveness is depleted. Modern countermeasures will do that.
How effective is a 1960s car, truck, or aircraft that has had zero maintenance. And is in a wet hole in the ground? Even if it works it’s still 1960s performance or less.
bow & arrows were quite effective at the time
Ok. Say the word "new". Now, say the word "clear". Now say them one after the other. There you go, you've got it.
Nu-kuh-lar. Got it! Easy, just like "Al-oo-min-um and Lithum and Vana-dum and Titan-um. I love to recite the Periodic Table in American English.
Interesting, Trump is also Bluff and Bluster
He is, but he is surround by people who will give him truthfull professional advise without any fear of falling out of a window if they "upset" him. That's a very important difference.
@@jglover4444Correct, but he just doesn’t listen to them.
@@jglover4444I take you've not heard of project 2025.
@@jglover4444 He doesnt listen to anyone except the little voice in his trousers.
@jglover4444 true...poor Russians.
Keep doing what you are doing, always overestimating yourselves and always underestimating Russia.
The latest `Bullshevik´ range of missiles.
Putin needs to keep taking the tablets 💊💊💊
They same ones his slaveboy Drumpf is taking.
The Novichok ones.
What about Kokainskyj?
Upgraded T55s sold by Russian state media as state of the art 😳😁😁😁
The guy is hillarious 😂
'Dont worry about russuan nukes, they're not trendy at all' militairy fashion police 😂😂😂
Mr. Putin….. Russia 🇷🇺 LOST … Go home bud!!
If Russia lost y r u crying like babies.
No. We will not
LOL 🤣🤣🤣 Stop beating me up, you lost, now please go home! 🤦
you have enough land vlad
They want to use up all their old weapons before they use their new ones duhhhh!
Russia has changed little in its geopolitical strategy since 1990. The fact that so many people do not travel and go abroad is a huge debilitating factor for the country. The fact that they are fed a steady diet of nationalistic propaganda with no outside options in the 21st century is almost unfathomable for a European group of individuals living within Russia..
You just described the reality of 90% of the global population.
These analysts have completely lost their minds.
I don't think it matters how old the systems are as long as they launch and reach their targets
Thermionic Valves are not very reliable.
Well, his Satan II test launch blew up right on the launchpad. Go figure.
@@kevinrobb86 If they’re old, they won’t reach their targets. As soon as these assets were commissioned, the countermeasures would have been developed. You could liken it to an F1 car from 1984 trying to compete on today’s grid. In military terms, they really are an analog threat to a digital defence system.
@@aexetanius 1st launch was successful, last THREE ? Well they've "successfully" dug big holes in the ground. The last one is on the satellite picture...
Russia has a mix of old and latest missiles, this analyst is scared and in denial. He should tell us how Russia how is destroying targets in Ukraine then. There are advantages of having old equipment in your arsenal. It's like cars - manual versus automatic. If you think you are better equipped because you are driving an automatic, you will be in for some surprises.
If..I...an American Stay at home mom......burst out laughing at Putin's video because of their obsolete equipment....I'm sure the rest of American citizens are not worried either
Putin is just like Donald Trump all talk.
True; but look at Trump, he might even win the US election with all the BS he talks!!
🙄🙄
We put a man on the moon with the equivalent of a couple of calculators and blinky lights.
What is he using next to frighten us...a nuke throwing Trebuchet.....and to the Russian trolls...we have nukes too and the chance that ours work is pretty high
The UK analysts want to dismiss what they do not want to be true.
If Russian ancient weapons are perfect imagine how their current ones looks like
The latest RS-28 Sarmat being tested blew up in the silo at launch, so... yeah. Great stuff.
I've said it before I'll say it again, those missles on parades are hollow tubes.
Putler’s Ancient Soviet Museum 😂
0:37 "Do you want to play a game?" Straight out of 1983s Wargame movie
Thanks Hamish, haven't had a laugh like this since the Monty Pythons fish slapping skit, last time I saw that style of cockpit dials was on our VC10 G-ARVJ, oh, and it was a bit similar to the Westland Whirlwind we operated🤣🤣
Thanks guys
HOW IS ANYONE EVEN CAPABLE OF SUCH GROSS INCOMPETENCE LOL.
The British labour government
"...We run exactly the same exercises..."
The last two British Trident II launches FAILED
A Tu-95 penetrated uk airspace in 2009 above Manchester, I seen it with my own eyes
You saw that all the way from Moscow??
@@biloki3079 Trust me as a man who once was accept to join the UK Navy as sonar operator on the Astute class. This man is a liar, Do not believe the lies from the UK media
TU-95s are off the British and Irish coasts constantly and have been since the 70s occasionally they'll stray off course.
Then why are you worried about it?
Mann this guy is useless. Russia always had ICBMS on wheels, YARS .. Expert doesn't know simple facts about Russia.
'Naive and basic threats' - brilliant summary. Hope Putin was watching.
Funny how most nasa missions today use Russian rockets, and the us and uk have yet to successfully develop hypersonics yet were supposed to believe their far behind us
Lol, Russia launched as part of it's contribution to the ISS & even then NASA had to cover part of the launch costs. Those days are over by the way Roscosmos is toast they lost NASA, ESA & western commercial contracts due to the Ukraine war which were the only thing keeping Russia's space program afloat. As for Hypersonic's they're just Soviet era ballistic missiles repurposed to attack ground targets & they have been around since the 1960's. A poor mans hypersonic other world powers don't use them because they don't offer anything over supersonics yet cost 10X the price. Western supplied air defences in Ukraine have had no problem intercepting them Putin's wonder weapon is Kremlin propaganda. Real Hypersonics being developed by the West use exotic power sources & can hit hypersonic speeds at low atmosphere with no need to slow down they would be near impossible to stop.
@ZuulGatekeeper funny roscomos just launched nasa astronaut into space in September, so it would seem like the days of nasa relying mostly on Russia are far from over.
Also, I'd like to ask what ballistic rockets they were repurposed from exactly? Are you suggesting russia has had airlaunch hypersonic since the 60s because that would just suggest they are light years ahead of the us.
And what is this exotic power source you speak of? So far, the only ones the us has developed are too large to mount to jets and have to be deployed from a b52 and still can't achieve half the speed of a Kinzhal.
And you really believe Ukraine shot 1 down when they struggle with lotterying drones from Iran? Who shot it down the ghost of keiv?
@@deason2365 These are the last launches paid for by NASA it has not renewed the contract with Roscosmos & Russia has to honor them or it's own astronauts will be stuck on the ISS as Dragon is set to return them. As said Russia's hypersonics are just ballistic missiles capabilities developed during the Cold War but not used by other world powers simply because they offer nothing but time to target at the expense of detection & increased cost. The Kinzhal is simply an air-launched long range ballistic missile. Even it's short range Zircon missiles have fallen far short of Kremlin claims Ukraine’s Western supplied air defences have proven the ability to intercept entire volley's of them the missile’s alleged unstoppable super weapon myth is just Kremlin propaganda.
@ZuulGatekeeper russia isn't the one with astronauts stuck on the iss rn, and would have zero problem retreving their astronauts, nasa on the other hand can not function or opperate period without roscosmos. nasa will continue to pay roscomos to send their astronauts to space for the foreseeable future because they have and always will be far more efficient. Nasa has been begging russian not to leave the iss program before 2030 not the other way around like you try to insinuate.
As far as your claim of having these rockets since the cold war I have to ask do you even know how they work, like the basics? Because the first successful scramjet was made in the 90s, how do you repurpose something that doesn't exist yet? Would be like saying the germans repurposed bf-109 to make the me-262.
As far as downing volleys, Ukraine claims to have shot down more then russia had even launched and the us has even dismissed all but one claim and even the details surrounding the one claim Washington confirmed is dubious. And the patriot system that was said to have downed it was destroyed in the strike involving the hypersonic and the us even suggested that Ukraine shouldn't attempt too shoot them down with patriot missiles because they had launched volleys of patriot missiles in the attempt to down the one costing ukrainian air defense dearly in resources.
And you still haven't told me what the exotic power source the us possess is
@ZuulGatekeeper russia isn't the one with astronauts stuck on the iss rn, and would have zero problem retreving their astronauts, nasa on the other hand can not function or opperate period without roscosmos. nasa will continue to pay roscomos to send their astronauts to space for the foreseeable future because they have and always will be far more efficient. Nasa is beging russian not to leave the iss program before 2030 not the other way around like you try to insinuate.
As far as your claim of having these rockets since the cold war I have to ask do you even know how they work, like the basics? Because the first successful scramjet was made in the 90s how do you repurpose a jet engine that doesn't exist? Would be like saying the germans repurposed bf-109 to make the me-262.
As far as downing volleys, Ukraine claims to have shot down more then russia had launched and the us has even dismissed all but one claim and even the details surrounding the one claim Washington confirmed is dubious. And the patriot system that was said to have downed it was destroyed in the strike involving the hypersonic and the us even suggested that Ukraine shouldn't attempt too shoot them down with patriot missiles because they had launched volleys of patriot missiles in the attempt to down the one costing ukrainian air defense dearly in resources.
And you still haven't told me what the exotic magical power source the us posses, is?
Chemical weapons? Really? I thought everyone agreed not to use those. Except police departments
Has germany already capitulated?
Dont ever underestimate the Russians
Putin should just give up and move to Venezuela, they are just prolonging the enevitable...
You do understand Ukraine is currently losing. The Donbas region is in collapse. Ukraine is losing 1,000 troops a day.
That missile control room looks only slightly more modern than the satellite control room at the start of “Ice Station Zebra”.
Do you remember Thunderbird's are Go?
even their control room was more realistic,
@ 🤣.
Man, I hated it when Ernest Borgnine turned out to be a damn Ruskie!
Uk currently can't launch a trident missile...we're hardly in a position to criticise
At least the UK military have the basic weapons to train with. Ha ha ha ha 😂 🤣 😆 😄 😀 😜
@@WuZu-s4w how come russia is winning then
@@goonerboz6023 A 3 Week Special Exercise that's over 3 Years old isn't a win. Russia has lost land, and putin is losing control because the Ukrainians are striking close to Moscow. Russian Mothers are demonstrating because putin's Army needs another mass mobilization. Did you get Your notice Ivan?
@@WuZu-s4w You are not in the military are you?
@goonerboz6023 Russia was going to win in just three days. Ha ha ha ha 😂 🤣 😆 😄 😀 😜
None of these missles has a nuclear warhead on it when they are being launched in drills. They have thousands of warhead, both tactical nukes and strategic nukes. But we can hope he isn't or at least his generals aren't idiotic enough to use them.
speculations... some work some does not work... that is the fact here...
Bro`s stopwatch is worth more then the entire command centre.
Hamish is the World expert of Bluff and Bluster.
The stopwatch - with date function and a neat compass - is currently wholesale at $2 per, so long as you go over 150 units. Gotta love that cutting edge technology....