That was requested by the CIA which was funding the film. An earlier draft would have just shown other animals revolting but the CIA insisted on showing that not all the farmers (e.g. capitalists) were corrupt and animals that were treated well didn't want to rebel. They were also concerned that making all the farmers evil would offend American audiences who were involved in agriculture.
I gotta be honest, I love the animated ending, seeing the animals invading the pigs house and fucking everything up is a sick way to end this story, and let's be honest, they just didn't do that in the book because it ended before they did that
A great introspective into both films. I agree, the animated film is better, but I'd rather just read the book again. It's way more interesting with it's dark ending.
I just subbed from the Caillou video for the cultural references predating 2000, and I see Animal Farm. It's one of my favorite books, and I just watched the first one. I'm glad I subscribed now!
20:14 in our universe corvids actually could mimmic human language, although its questonable if they actually understand what they are saying and if their capable of using those to comunicate with us . meanwhile in this universe the answer is yes albeit somewhat limited
Napoleon admired the farmer his ideals were not his own but ones thrust upon him snowball was a revolutionary but napoleon a realist the animals becoming the farmers was the perfect cycle continues allegory
I thought Jim Henson did a brilliant job with the puppetry in the 1999 version! The animals look just like actual animals. The CGI however has aged poorly. And as for the rest of what you said, I pretty much agree with everything. The book is by far superior to these movies.
I remember the book from 9th grade and the we didn’t touch the book we just talked about it Other than that when the test came it asked question about the book We didn’t touch the book But hey I love your video
@@astorothwarriorofsunlight5471 Especially when it's supposed to be an ADULTS' cartoon! Unless they're handicapped or something, adults already understand "show, don't tell."
One change in the animated movie I like is how animals from different farms had different reactions to the news
That was requested by the CIA which was funding the film. An earlier draft would have just shown other animals revolting but the CIA insisted on showing that not all the farmers (e.g. capitalists) were corrupt and animals that were treated well didn't want to rebel. They were also concerned that making all the farmers evil would offend American audiences who were involved in agriculture.
@@RX-12 if that's the reason than it's kinda weird they left out Molly
@@Melphas They probably didn't read the book themselves, they were just relying on the filmmakers' script.
I gotta be honest, I love the animated ending, seeing the animals invading the pigs house and fucking everything up is a sick way to end this story, and let's be honest, they just didn't do that in the book because it ended before they did that
Thus the cycle restarting it’s a story as old as time
14:15
Squealer: What do we do?
Napoleon: Idfk
A great introspective into both films. I agree, the animated film is better, but I'd rather just read the book again. It's way more interesting with it's dark ending.
You can't go wrong with the book.
@@MultiCoolmovies I didnt get the ending tbh on a unrelated note can I get my friend willdog to react to some of your stuff?
Go ahead.
@@MultiCoolmovies thanks
I just subbed from the Caillou video for the cultural references predating 2000, and I see Animal Farm. It's one of my favorite books, and I just watched the first one. I'm glad I subscribed now!
You didn't mention the scene where a human female flirted with Napoleon. How dare you?
Virgin Snowball vs Chad Napoleon.
8:26
Pig: ❌
Vacuum: ✅
5:25,I loved the death note reference
20:14 in our universe corvids actually could mimmic human language, although its questonable if they actually understand what they are saying and if their capable of using those to comunicate with us . meanwhile in this universe the answer is yes albeit somewhat limited
Had arrangements for What? Great comparisons to the source material. Four stars goo-ood!
What’s interesting is no female human ever seen in the 1954 adaptation
Why do you think?
15:00 that sly look
37:27 I love the end song.
Napoleon admired the farmer his ideals were not his own but ones thrust upon him snowball was a revolutionary but napoleon a realist the animals becoming the farmers was the perfect cycle continues allegory
21:59 That's Elaine Banes from Seinfeld.
21:26 21:26 21:26 😅😅😅 21:26 21:26 21:26
34:14 they really did that I look at on TH-cam
I thought Jim Henson did a brilliant job with the puppetry in the 1999 version! The animals look just like actual animals. The CGI however has aged poorly. And as for the rest of what you said, I pretty much agree with everything. The book is by far superior to these movies.
21:19 21:19 21:19 21:19 21:19 21:19 21:19 21:19 21:19 21:19 21:19 21:19 21:19 21:19 21:19 glf
The 1954 film is far better than the 1999 adaption
21:27 21:27 21:27 21:27 21:27
I remember the book from 9th grade and the we didn’t touch the book we just talked about it
Other than that when the test came it asked question about the book
We didn’t touch the book
But hey I love your video
Ps Patrick Stewart as Napoleon.
The animated movie made me feel like I was stupid and it was holding my hand…. I like the book better.
@@astorothwarriorofsunlight5471 Especially when it's supposed to be an ADULTS' cartoon! Unless they're handicapped or something, adults already understand "show, don't tell."
6:24 6:24 6:24 6:24 6:25 6:25 6:25 6:25
you should talk about mr g productions
I don't know what that is.