I bought the older Explorer 36 114270 online during the pandemic, pretty much pulled the trigger without even seeing or trying the watch in person. As someone who was used to bigger and busier watches ( I had the the 42mm Exp II 216570), I was initially a little disappointed when the Explorer 36 arrived as I felt it was underwhelming and was already thinking of selling it. However I gave it a chance and wore it daily for 2 weeks and when I was looking at my wrist I had an 'Aha' moment, I finally understood and appreciated the smaller size and the beauty in simplicity. Long story short, the 216570 is no longer in my collection while I'm still wearing the 114270 almost daily till now.
I kept my 124270 for less than a year. I never felt it looked right on my wrist. Really wanted to love this watch. My BB58 on the other hand just felt right from the first day.
This watch size sits beautifully on 7in wrists. Its a very classy, smart casual look. The watch should be a complement of your outfit, not the focal point. What do you mean by "smaller wrists"?
@@Puertorrican_Power " What do you mean by "smaller wrists"? Simple and I think a good comment too. We all have wrist circumferences. Mine is 7.4. I'm debating a 36 vs 39 and have found my 38mm SARB 035 to be about perfect. It also depends on the bezel too. I have a 36 Lorier Falcon that is beautiful but, for me, just a tad too small on wrist. I'm leaning toward the 39 Explorer.
Just got mine and I'm 5'6" and 160lbs - used to have a Panerai 44mm so I'm not unfamiliar with larger watches. This new one is the absolutely perfect size for me. Simple, perfect. I really dig it and can't see myself tiring of it. Great watch, Rolex!
Great analysis. On the James Bond point, Ian Fleming actually wore the 1016 variant while writing the JB novels. He coined the Explorer 1, ' the gentleman's watch'. I am 6-4 210 w/ 7.5" wrist, and the new Explorer looks small on me; and I am still trying to get use to it. I previously owned the 116600 Rolex Sea Dweller which at 40mm was the perfect watch size for me. The thing I disliked about the Sea Dweller was the excess weight which was noticeable on runs, hikes, etc. In contrast, I sometimes forget that I am wearing the new Explorer 124270 on my outdoor pursuits w/ its compact form factor and 120g weight. Moreover, the watch is perfect for business settings when I have to wear a suit and tie. It is a great all-arounder. In a perfect world, I would like it to have a date function and be sized at 37.5mm, but it is pretty incredible as is.
Its the all rounder aspect where the explorer shines. So much so its actually difficult in a collection because it covers so many bases that all watches steal wrist time from it.
@@aussieexpatwatches Yes! Now I'm thinking "do I really need my Cartier Tank MC for dressy occasions? I've got this 36mm Ex 1 and it's actually kind of perfect..."
Just changed my 'expression of interest' from the 40 to this. The 40 fits great on my 7.25" wrists, and after previously trying the 36 I was on the fence about it being too small. Sometimes you've just got to accept if you want the original classic size it's going to be a small watch. I recently purchased a current Explorer II and have a 40mm Sub, but love the versatility of my Grand Seiko 37mm quartz. Expecting the 36mm Explorer to give a similar wearing experience, and hopefully with everyone wanting the 40mm I'll get one a lot sooner.
I also have 7.25" wrists and I'm on the fence whether to go 40 or 36. Currently have a 36 that my AD is willing to buy so the swap wouldn't be difficult. Its hard to compare considering I have more time with the 36 on my wrist and only trying the 40 on at AD. I understand the history, but at the end of the day its important for me to have a watch I'm happy with.
Those veins are a phlebotomist's dream. In the wrist shot, it almost looks like the watch stalls the blood flow, filling the vein on the back of your hand. Possibly add a link?
Thx for the honest review. I also got the watch and can totally relate to your points. In the end its a personal taste. Funny is that in the past real "Men" didn't need big watches. It all depends on the time we live in. The most important thing is that your comfortable wearing your watch on a daily basis, start to create memories and just enjoy it. Cheers
My wrist is about 16.5mm and 36mm looks good on me although I could also wear the newer 40mm. 38mm is my sweet spot with non-Rolex watches so at 17cm I don’t think you can go wrong with either 36mm or 39mm. Maybe try on a 39mm first?
I like the 40 for my 7.5" wrist, and I think they did a good job of making it a smallish wearing 40mm. I realize I'm not an enthusiast. I don't really care about the history, especially the fake history. When choosing between the 36 and 40, listen to your inner voice, not voices of enthusiasts, echos of made-up history, or the internet. Make your choice and lean into it!
Agree, ultimately, you wear the watch, not it's history. I personally am still loving the smaller explorer. It's a bit of a holiday from every other sports watch that's much bigger.
Sports watches DO tend to be a bit too large. My beater upper watch is a 41mm Boldr Expedition, and I just sold my Bulova 43mm Lunar Pilot, so that's probably why the Explorer 40mm looks smallish, and perfect, to me.
The 36 is perfect for me (6.5” wrist). I have a DJ41, and while I absolutely love it, it’s oversized on my wrist. I’d like to get a Day/Date, but it’ll be a 36mm.
I live in Sacramento and often drive to Lake Tahoe. Explorer 36mm Is the only watch I can stick out of my Jeep Wrangler window without a worry. We both enjoying California sunbath. Imagine how this watch going to age in 10 years in this weather under the direct sun. I can’t think of a better companion. Oh I forgot to mention, my wrist size is 18 cm
Anyone trying this on for a video should state their wrist size first. People will come up with all types of mental gymnastics to justify liking this 36mm watch. Small watches have not been in style for over 30+ years at this point. Men are also physically larger than in 1950 due to nutrition and often too many calories. If your wrist is over 7” this watch will look feminine on a man. It’s actually looks smaller than you would think when you see it in person
Also, we need to get off the “original size” and “heritage” bunk. This is simply a great looking watch. Its heritage is completely made up marketing. Shouldn’t even be mentioned in the same sentence as a Moonwatch. Its original size is just a result of the time it was made. That was the style. It hasn’t been that in a very long time. Rolex brought this back for smaller men to buy.
@@denbo74 I agree, heritage and history is overplayed marketing. I like the watches size because of its wearability and under-the-radar look. I judge the watch based on what it does for me as an every day wearer. But don't get me started on the moonwatch. Ultimately, you wear the watch you paid for, not the history of previous models. You aren't James Bond if you get a submariner or explorer, and you aren't an astronaut if you get a speedy.
@@aussieexpatwatches ….but Omega actually had their Speedmasters approved by NASA and worn in space and on the moon. That actually happened…for years. The Russians still use them in space. No Explorer ever did anything. There is no history and no historical practical connection to its size of 36mm. It simply was the style at the time. I’m waiting on an Explorer 40 because it’s one of the greatest watch designs ever and the 36 looks absurd on my 7.5” wrist.
So Ian Fleming, Mohammed Ali, David Attenborough are all women, right? I can assure you that all of those men are somewhat more "manly" than anyone whose sense of manliness comes from commenting on TH-cam!
@@ninjesus4079 these people that are saying 36mm watches are for women are something else, they probably need to compensate for something or they're so used to having a baseball bat shoved up their butt that anything else feels small.
The 124270 is my weekend watch, it goes on the wrist at 6pm friday when i get home from work, and goes back in the box 10pm sunday night....during the week i find myslef looking forward to friday evening so i can put it back on...epic
I don’t mind smaller watches, in fact I favor mid-century sizes, but but, I don’t understand why they tried to make a supposedly sports watch even daintier than previous models. How about an actual 36mm case size with a 20mm bracelet and not an exaggerated taper? Perfection!
I initially thought this as well, but now that Ive got it and been wearing it, I understand why. Proportionally it just feels and looks better, i thought I would be disappointed about how thin and how harsh the taper was but now I wish every watch was like this. I cant see wearing any other watch with minimal taper and a clasp that isnt as solid as the explorer’s.
I was on the wait list for the 36 but when I heard about the introduction of the 40, I called the AD and changed my preference. Just took delivery of the 40 a few days ago. Happy I made the switch, as the 36 was just too small IMHO.
It is al relative. Unfortunately I have to live with tiny 5.7 inch or 14.5cm wrists… A 36mm case and 44mm lug-to-lug is the absolute maximum I can (barely) pull off. So, despite I am a certified Sinn and JLC fanboy, they (still) have nothing for me… I have been hearing “the big watch trend is over”, for almost two decades. I have been waiting for two decades for a lot of brands to ‘do a PRX’ and issue 35mm versions. I would love a 34/35mm Sinn 856 UTC, a reissue of the 35mm Speedmaster (without the effing girly diamonds and colors!) or even a 34/35mm Tudor Ranger. But no…nothing. Barely any waterproof tool watches in 34/35 or even 36mm at all, of any heritage brand! (Except Rolex.) Even today. Sinn still does not offer a single model in 34/35 or 36mm. JLC’s waterproof watches are all wall clocks. …So, my saved up funds are probably going towards a Rolex 114270 next year 🤷♂️
14270 for me. I prefer the tritium dial & classic look. Next best thing to the larger dial/thinner bezel 1016. The 39mm & 40mm dials don't have the same balance & the 19mm tapering bracelet of the 124270 makes the watch look even smaller.
There’s debates on whether Rolex was really the first watch up Everest but Smiths is no longer in business and the connection back to Sir Edmund (a fellow NZer) is good enough for me. Plus also agree on the 007 connection. The original watch of Mr Bond. A proper enthusiast’s watch that flies under the radar, only those that know will know. ✌️
Well and.. the explorer came after the white dial OP he wore... but ive asked others, whats a more true everest watch, a white dial OP or the explorer. Nobody agrees its the OP.
@@aussieexpatwatches yea agree lol it’s more like it was the end result of Rolex’s experiment to send a watch up Everest. Still a fantastic watch and one I’m wearing while abroad over my speedy Hesalite 3861, because I reckon the 124270 is that much more discreet. I can enjoy it more without worrying too much.
@@Lester_DorEes I enjoy travelling with it to! Although I do admit I have used the Ex2 on my last couple trips, again to be forgiven, it's my latest "explorer". But in more classy company, Explorer, would be my go to travel watch.
I have a two watch collection BB58 and this Explorer. Love both. The Explorer is dead accurate and i dont feel it on my wrist when i wear it! I think about adding a Speedy Pro for the perfect 3 Watch Collection!
Don't add the speedy! PLEASE DON'T! It's honestly not going to add anything at all to your collection. IMO in terms of quality, feel and use, it sits somewhere between your Explorer and BB58, and costs more.... I don't know you well, but maybe a black daytona (116500LN), or even a DJ36 (jubilee, fluted)might be great complements.
The BB58 is just ‘right’. Probably the next watch I’ll add to my collection. Regarding the Speedy: try one if you haven’t seen it in the metal. Feels great on the wrist and the heritage makes it special. It’s on my wish list, but I agree it’s expensive at RRP.
@@aussieexpatwatchesAs someone that currently owns at 124270 Explorer and a 3861 Speedy, I gotta completely disagree with you. It’s a great compliment to a collection with an Explorer and BB58.
@@aussieexpatwatches I wanted a Speedy for a long time but every time I try one on I’m a bit underwhelmed. Something in me really wants to love it because it looks so great in pictures but it just feels flat and unexciting in person. There’s just something special about the Explorer that’s hard to articulate. It’s discreet but in person it feels very high quality. I would imagine it grows on you over time. Planning on getting one hopefully soon.
The ‘big watch’ trend really ramped up when Invictus watches hit the scene (yikes)! Before 2010 or so, a gentleman’s watch was around 36mm. So-called specialist watches (divers, pilots watches) were built for a purpose and were bigger for that reason.
if they are messing with size and decimals - 36.9mm, keep the 20mm lugs and calling it 36 would have been an absolute win and they wouldnt have needed to even make the 40
Is not the watch that is small ! Is this stupid dainty tiny bracelet that they’ve put that makes the watch feel small ! I sold it in less than a month with loss . If the bracelet was 20mm tapered to 16 would be probably one of the best Rolex to buy ! Imo they targeted female audience too with this move
Depends what you are used to. The ex36 clasp and bracelet are 1mm wider than the omega moonwatch, but you don't see any complaints about the taper on that watch.
Nice review, but I came away with little understanding as to whether you REALLY feel that the 124270 is a "small watch"! Hardly even a mention! I bought one for my 6.5" wrist and I can tell you that, while it is not a large watch by sports watch standards, this iconic 36mm (36mm bezel diameter, 35.4mm case diameter) is proportionately a perfect fit for a wrist up to 7". That was true in the 1950s (Explorer 1016), and remains true today. Nice to see that, in returning to the 36mm after a brief period of abandonment, Rolex got the memo... "If it ain't broke, don't fix it". Somewhat reminiscent of the Coke Classic/New Coke debacle of the 1990s. My other grail is a 43-year-old Pepsi GMT-Master (16750) at just a hair under 40mm, and my wrist is equally comfortable wearing either the 36mm Explorer or the 40mm GMT.
It looks smaller in person vs. video. I think the idea that a sub is "look at me" is in your mind. Most people dont know or care what watch we are weating. And if they are, who cares what they thingk....you should be wearing what you like, not worry what other people think. I think 38mm would be the sweet spot for explorer and other rolex sport watches. There is no right or wrong, it's whatever you like is the right watch.
Pfffffff.....dude ....please 14 minutes rambling about "it is a small watch" (kinda disrespectful to the one who gave it to you btw) and FINALY on the wrist at 14:00.
@aussieexpatwatches thanks for the reaction 😄...and just a tip: more wrist time. After all, That's what most people come for. To see how a watch looks on a wrist. If I had a youtube channel about watches I would show the watch on the wrist with different looks. For example, wearing a t-shirt, a suit, a longsleeve shirt and a sweater. I haven't seen any watch channel do that while again....i guess that's one of the main reasons to visit "how does it look on a wrist" ....( I don't have the amount of watches to start a youtube channel, just one $155 watch 😂 so that would be boring real quick..... All the best to you buddy.
Well the explorer is also an oyster perpetual 😆 but anyway theres no difinitive answer. The main hint is that ian flemming wore an explorer. Its a fictional character anyway 😆
Hi Aussie - thanks for your open minded review of the Explorer 36- as I like the classic wrist watch sizes 34mm and 36mm I‘m also considering a 36mm Explorer. Would you you consider it still appropriate for a gentleman with a 7 inch wrist ? ( I‘m one of them🙂) - May I know your wristsize to have a better idea regarding your video- thank you
@@aussieexpatwatches Dear Aussie - thank you fir this honest reply - and I agree - the best way to find out is to try it on your own wrist - but there we are again with this availability problem of Rolex …
Perfect watch and size for my 6.5" wrist. Would love the newer Sub, but definitely looks too big on my wrist, for my taste - will look to try on an older model sub to see how it looks.
The difference between thee subs is less that .3mm i think. The 41mm may wear better due to the wider 21mm bracelet. Maybe an 11 series daytona at 38mm 😀
Explorer 36 è perfetto , il 39 sembra una padella come OP 41 e datejust 41.. venduti entrambi , sono troppo grandi. 40-41 solo daytona gmt o submariner gli altri no.
Thanks. It did cross my mind to visit the grey market dealer and enquire about the 36mm Explorer at Singapore in early September. The only issue I’m facing with is telling apart from the genuine and the fake Rolex explorer .
@@johnnytan5195 I wish that part was simpler. At least the explorer is a single model, you don't also have to worry if the watch is real, then also the dialed swapped like the OPs.
I loved the 124270 when I had it but that taper killed it for me. Granted I have a much larger wrist at 7.25-7.5 depending on the amount of pizza consumed. Seeing it on you in person, I think it fits you perfectly (and makes me wonder how you can wear an exp2 😂)
I waited 2 years on Rolex fairy list for this 36mm exp , im glad I did. In that time the Tudor BB54 came out, and I picked one up that was available in the window. Safe to say I don't need an exp 1 anymore.
That's strange. An Explorer 1 is a walk-in watch. I waited for less than a week before I got the call (I never had a purchase history with this AD in Sydney). I guess I was lucky. I love the Explorer 1, I don't wear my BB58 as much now. A BB54 is definitely on my list, or a Pelagos 39.
@@aussieexpatwatchesbut didn’t you say in the video how the Exp just blows away the BB58 and looks much higher quality? You’re saying the 54 looks better than the Exp?
@@MrQuadraaa Looks and quality are not the same thing in my book. The explorer is hard to match in terms of quality in my opinion. But the BB58 is by far one of the most appealing watches out there. I wouldn't ultimately be choosing one or the other. It would be a tough choice.
I bought the older Explorer 36 114270 online during the pandemic, pretty much pulled the trigger without even seeing or trying the watch in person. As someone who was used to bigger and busier watches ( I had the the 42mm Exp II 216570), I was initially a little disappointed when the Explorer 36 arrived as I felt it was underwhelming and was already thinking of selling it. However I gave it a chance and wore it daily for 2 weeks and when I was looking at my wrist I had an 'Aha' moment, I finally understood and appreciated the smaller size and the beauty in simplicity. Long story short, the 216570 is no longer in my collection while I'm still wearing the 114270 almost daily till now.
What an amazing journey! 👏 you definitely have a passion for the explorer trying to find the perfect one.
@@aussieexpatwatches two tone wears bigger more presence I found
I kept my 124270 for less than a year. I never felt it looked right on my wrist. Really wanted to love this watch. My BB58 on the other hand just felt right from the first day.
For smaller wrists, this is a stunning piece!
This watch size sits beautifully on 7in wrists. Its a very classy, smart casual look. The watch should be a complement of your outfit, not the focal point. What do you mean by "smaller wrists"?
@@Puertorrican_Power " What do you mean by "smaller wrists"?
Simple and I think a good comment too. We all have wrist circumferences. Mine is 7.4. I'm debating a 36 vs 39 and have found my 38mm SARB 035 to be about perfect. It also depends on the bezel too. I have a 36 Lorier Falcon that is beautiful but, for me, just a tad too small on wrist.
I'm leaning toward the 39 Explorer.
Just got mine and I'm 5'6" and 160lbs - used to have a Panerai 44mm so I'm not unfamiliar with larger watches. This new one is the absolutely perfect size for me. Simple, perfect. I really dig it and can't see myself tiring of it. Great watch, Rolex!
Looking forward to this one as an owner of the last 3 watches you have reviewed, this is my go-to, and I have strong opinions on this subject!
Great analysis. On the James Bond point, Ian Fleming actually wore the 1016 variant while writing the JB novels. He coined the Explorer 1, ' the gentleman's watch'. I am 6-4 210 w/ 7.5" wrist, and the new Explorer looks small on me; and I am still trying to get use to it. I previously owned the 116600 Rolex Sea Dweller which at 40mm was the perfect watch size for me. The thing I disliked about the Sea Dweller was the excess weight which was noticeable on runs, hikes, etc. In contrast, I sometimes forget that I am wearing the new Explorer 124270 on my outdoor pursuits w/ its compact form factor and 120g weight. Moreover, the watch is perfect for business settings when I have to wear a suit and tie. It is a great all-arounder. In a perfect world, I would like it to have a date function and be sized at 37.5mm, but it is pretty incredible as is.
Its the all rounder aspect where the explorer shines. So much so its actually difficult in a collection because it covers so many bases that all watches steal wrist time from it.
@@aussieexpatwatches Yes! Now I'm thinking "do I really need my Cartier Tank MC for dressy occasions? I've got this 36mm Ex 1 and it's actually kind of perfect..."
Looks perfect on your wrist. For me, my wrist is 7.5-8" so the 40 suits me better.
Just changed my 'expression of interest' from the 40 to this. The 40 fits great on my 7.25" wrists, and after previously trying the 36 I was on the fence about it being too small. Sometimes you've just got to accept if you want the original classic size it's going to be a small watch. I recently purchased a current Explorer II and have a 40mm Sub, but love the versatility of my Grand Seiko 37mm quartz. Expecting the 36mm Explorer to give a similar wearing experience, and hopefully with everyone wanting the 40mm I'll get one a lot sooner.
A fellow SBGX259 owner?
I also have 7.25" wrists and I'm on the fence whether to go 40 or 36. Currently have a 36 that my AD is willing to buy so the swap wouldn't be difficult. Its hard to compare considering I have more time with the 36 on my wrist and only trying the 40 on at AD. I understand the history, but at the end of the day its important for me to have a watch I'm happy with.
@@ryanrodriguez5293 What did you end up with? I'm 7.5ish and think the 39 would be perfect. The 36 a tad too small looking.
Its perfect on your wrist. I have bigger wrist and went for the same. This is the real explorer.
Wear it in good health!
Gday , Just wanting to know more about the 36mm Rolex before i try to get one for myself.
Those veins are a phlebotomist's dream. In the wrist shot, it almost looks like the watch stalls the blood flow, filling the vein on the back of your hand. Possibly add a link?
It's actually fired quite loosely thanks to it being light. I do have prominent veins.
Thx for the honest review. I also got the watch and can totally relate to your points. In the end its a personal taste. Funny is that in the past real "Men" didn't need big watches. It all depends on the time we live in. The most important thing is that your comfortable wearing your watch on a daily basis, start to create memories and just enjoy it. Cheers
Very well said! Nobody cares about this stuff except us, so wear what you love.
Any issues with accuracy? I read that there may be an issue with the 32xx movements. If not, I want this watch so bad!
So the "issue" with 32xx is lower amplitude due to tuning for greater power reserve. But actual accuracy is fantastic.
Thank you for that amazing review, my wrist is 17cm do you think 36mm would be good for me ? or 39mm better ?
My wrist is about 16.5mm and 36mm looks good on me although I could also wear the newer 40mm. 38mm is my sweet spot with non-Rolex watches so at 17cm I don’t think you can go wrong with either 36mm or 39mm. Maybe try on a 39mm first?
@@ianforber im going to try both thank you so much
Whatever speaks to you. I dont agree with the general idea that you have to wear a watch that's "the right size". All that matters is you love it.
I tried one for a few weeks, didn't get it, it's just too small and I only have a 7 inch wrist, sold it
I like the 39 mark 2
A lot more tooly. Great watch.
Stunning
the bracelet at 14mm is a tad too small.
Well that's at the clasp, and the Speedmaster actually tapers to smaller than that, and nobody complains about that.
@@aussieexpatwatches i think the speedy is 15mm. However, i'll take what i said back. I'm starting to prefer smaller watches. Gentlemen size
I like the 40 for my 7.5" wrist, and I think they did a good job of making it a smallish wearing 40mm. I realize I'm not an enthusiast. I don't really care about the history, especially the fake history. When choosing between the 36 and 40, listen to your inner voice, not voices of enthusiasts, echos of made-up history, or the internet. Make your choice and lean into it!
Agree, ultimately, you wear the watch, not it's history.
I personally am still loving the smaller explorer. It's a bit of a holiday from every other sports watch that's much bigger.
Sports watches DO tend to be a bit too large. My beater upper watch is a 41mm Boldr Expedition, and I just sold my Bulova 43mm Lunar Pilot, so that's probably why the Explorer 40mm looks smallish, and perfect, to me.
It's perfectly sized.
What’s your wrist size please?
6.0"
The 36 is perfect for me (6.5” wrist). I have a DJ41, and while I absolutely love it, it’s oversized on my wrist. I’d like to get a Day/Date, but it’ll be a 36mm.
I live in Sacramento and often drive to Lake Tahoe. Explorer 36mm
Is the only watch I can stick out of my Jeep Wrangler window without a worry. We both enjoying California sunbath. Imagine how this watch going to age in 10 years in this weather under the direct sun. I can’t think of a better companion. Oh I forgot to mention, my wrist size is 18 cm
Its such a great piece to be comfortable with in every way.
Oh My! It really is a small watch!!
It’s TOO big if anything FOR you son 😊
Anyone trying this on for a video should state their wrist size first. People will come up with all types of mental gymnastics to justify liking this 36mm watch. Small watches have not been in style for over 30+ years at this point. Men are also physically larger than in 1950 due to nutrition and often too many calories. If your wrist is over 7” this watch will look feminine on a man. It’s actually looks smaller than you would think when you see it in person
Ultimately buy what you like. Its a small watch, and people are grown up enough hopefully to understand if that appeals to them.
Also, we need to get off the “original size” and “heritage” bunk. This is simply a great looking watch. Its heritage is completely made up marketing. Shouldn’t even be mentioned in the same sentence as a Moonwatch. Its original size is just a result of the time it was made. That was the style. It hasn’t been that in a very long time. Rolex brought this back for smaller men to buy.
@@denbo74 I agree, heritage and history is overplayed marketing. I like the watches size because of its wearability and under-the-radar look. I judge the watch based on what it does for me as an every day wearer.
But don't get me started on the moonwatch. Ultimately, you wear the watch you paid for, not the history of previous models. You aren't James Bond if you get a submariner or explorer, and you aren't an astronaut if you get a speedy.
@@aussieexpatwatches ….but Omega actually had their Speedmasters approved by NASA and worn in space and on the moon. That actually happened…for years. The Russians still use them in space. No Explorer ever did anything. There is no history and no historical practical connection to its size of 36mm. It simply was the style at the time. I’m waiting on an Explorer 40 because it’s one of the greatest watch designs ever and the 36 looks absurd on my 7.5” wrist.
No it’s not unless you’re a big heavy person.
The 36m explorer is a ladies watch. Rolex reps will even suggest it’s a women watch and push men towards the 40.
Sounds like a bad rep then, they shouldn't be telling people one is for men and one is for women because people can wear what they like.
Cold blooded.
lol tell that to Tony Soprano...
Sounds like someone who needs to compensate
So Ian Fleming, Mohammed Ali, David Attenborough are all women, right? I can assure you that all of those men are somewhat more "manly" than anyone whose sense of manliness comes from commenting on TH-cam!
@@ninjesus4079 these people that are saying 36mm watches are for women are something else, they probably need to compensate for something or they're so used to having a baseball bat shoved up their butt that anything else feels small.
That’s a woman’s watch.
Ladies size.
The 124270 is my weekend watch, it goes on the wrist at 6pm friday when i get home from work, and goes back in the box 10pm sunday night....during the week i find myslef looking forward to friday evening so i can put it back on...epic
I don’t mind smaller watches, in fact I favor mid-century sizes, but but, I don’t understand why they tried to make a supposedly sports watch even daintier than previous models. How about an actual 36mm case size with a 20mm bracelet and not an exaggerated taper? Perfection!
Yes, my thoughts exactly. The OP 36 wears bigger than the 124270.
Isn't the taper the normal 5mm? 19 to 14 is 5mm. I think that's the same as all their 20mm watches.
I initially thought this as well, but now that Ive got it and been wearing it, I understand why. Proportionally it just feels and looks better, i thought I would be disappointed about how thin and how harsh the taper was but now I wish every watch was like this. I cant see wearing any other watch with minimal taper and a clasp that isnt as solid as the explorer’s.
Just bought the OP36 black dial. 20 mm lug width tapers down to 16 mm. Problem solved.
I was on the wait list for the 36 but when I heard about the introduction of the 40, I called the AD and changed my preference. Just took delivery of the 40 a few days ago. Happy I made the switch, as the 36 was just too small IMHO.
It is al relative. Unfortunately I have to live with tiny 5.7 inch or 14.5cm wrists… A 36mm case and 44mm lug-to-lug is the absolute maximum I can (barely) pull off. So, despite I am a certified Sinn and JLC fanboy, they (still) have nothing for me… I have been hearing “the big watch trend is over”, for almost two decades. I have been waiting for two decades for a lot of brands to ‘do a PRX’ and issue 35mm versions. I would love a 34/35mm Sinn 856 UTC, a reissue of the 35mm Speedmaster (without the effing girly diamonds and colors!) or even a 34/35mm Tudor Ranger. But no…nothing. Barely any waterproof tool watches in 34/35 or even 36mm at all, of any heritage brand! (Except Rolex.) Even today. Sinn still does not offer a single model in 34/35 or 36mm. JLC’s waterproof watches are all wall clocks. …So, my saved up funds are probably going towards a Rolex 114270 next year 🤷♂️
Man that was a fantastic review. Very smooth. The 36mm looks great on you.😊
36mm is perfect. I don’t like the 39 and 40mm Explorers.
14270 for me. I prefer the tritium dial & classic look. Next best thing to the larger dial/thinner bezel 1016. The 39mm & 40mm dials don't have the same balance & the 19mm tapering bracelet of the 124270 makes the watch look even smaller.
There’s debates on whether Rolex was really the first watch up Everest but Smiths is no longer in business and the connection back to Sir Edmund (a fellow NZer) is good enough for me.
Plus also agree on the 007 connection. The original watch of Mr Bond. A proper enthusiast’s watch that flies under the radar, only those that know will know. ✌️
Well and.. the explorer came after the white dial OP he wore... but ive asked others, whats a more true everest watch, a white dial OP or the explorer. Nobody agrees its the OP.
@@aussieexpatwatches yea agree lol it’s more like it was the end result of Rolex’s experiment to send a watch up Everest. Still a fantastic watch and one I’m wearing while abroad over my speedy Hesalite 3861, because I reckon the 124270 is that much more discreet. I can enjoy it more without worrying too much.
@@Lester_DorEes I enjoy travelling with it to! Although I do admit I have used the Ex2 on my last couple trips, again to be forgiven, it's my latest "explorer".
But in more classy company, Explorer, would be my go to travel watch.
Don’t forget, Ian Fleming wore an Explorer. I’d bet that if the two-tone were available back then he’d have worn one (I have a 124273 and love it)!
I brought the 224270 40mm. Love it. Wait, was only 10 days. Boom. Box ticked.
Congrats on the explorer! A lovely piece.
I have a two watch collection BB58 and this Explorer. Love both. The Explorer is dead accurate and i dont feel it on my wrist when i wear it! I think about adding a Speedy Pro for the perfect 3 Watch Collection!
Don't add the speedy! PLEASE DON'T!
It's honestly not going to add anything at all to your collection. IMO in terms of quality, feel and use, it sits somewhere between your Explorer and BB58, and costs more....
I don't know you well, but maybe a black daytona (116500LN), or even a DJ36 (jubilee, fluted)might be great complements.
The BB58 is just ‘right’. Probably the next watch I’ll add to my collection. Regarding the Speedy: try one if you haven’t seen it in the metal. Feels great on the wrist and the heritage makes it special. It’s on my wish list, but I agree it’s expensive at RRP.
@@aussieexpatwatchesAs someone that currently owns at 124270 Explorer and a 3861 Speedy, I gotta completely disagree with you. It’s a great compliment to a collection with an Explorer and BB58.
@@aussieexpatwatches I wanted a Speedy for a long time but every time I try one on I’m a bit underwhelmed. Something in me really wants to love it because it looks so great in pictures but it just feels flat and unexciting in person.
There’s just something special about the Explorer that’s hard to articulate. It’s discreet but in person it feels very high quality. I would imagine it grows on you over time. Planning on getting one hopefully soon.
@vantage789 the explorer exudes quality when side by side with the speedy. The speedy is very photogenic, but in person... not amazing.
Take a sip every time he say's "it's a small watch" 😂
Its SMAAAAAAAALL!
It's a classy, very gentleman looking watch. It might be small by today standards, but that does not mean today standards are right
The ‘big watch’ trend really ramped up when Invictus watches hit the scene (yikes)! Before 2010 or so, a gentleman’s watch was around 36mm. So-called specialist watches (divers, pilots watches) were built for a purpose and were bigger for that reason.
I love love love the two tone !!!
if they are messing with size and decimals - 36.9mm, keep the 20mm lugs and calling it 36 would have been an absolute win and they wouldnt have needed to even make the 40
That’s my next watch! I’ve had my eyes on that for years now!
Is not the watch that is small ! Is this stupid dainty tiny bracelet that they’ve put that makes the watch feel small ! I sold it in less than a month with loss . If the bracelet was 20mm tapered to 16 would be probably one of the best Rolex to buy ! Imo they targeted female audience too with this move
Depends what you are used to. The ex36 clasp and bracelet are 1mm wider than the omega moonwatch, but you don't see any complaints about the taper on that watch.
@@aussieexpatwatches yes but the speedy has wrist presence been 42mm the bracelet doesn’t destroy the look ! Anyways 114270 best explorer ever imo.
In have a Sub 41mm, a BB58 and an Explorer 36… an a small wrist. the explorer is the one i wear the most. I m 1m85 tall an 80kg….
When you get used to wearing a smaller timepiece, bigger watches start to look and feel ridiculous. Its the law of the universe.
It was the standard size for mens watches until way into the 80's. How can it be "too small"?? It's personal taste I geuss.
Very comfortable and a pleasure to wear all day everyday
I find the 40” a little on the small side. I still love it though 👍
Nice review, but I came away with little understanding as to whether you REALLY feel that the 124270 is a "small watch"! Hardly even a mention! I bought one for my 6.5" wrist and I can tell you that, while it is not a large watch by sports watch standards, this iconic 36mm (36mm bezel diameter, 35.4mm case diameter) is proportionately a perfect fit for a wrist up to 7". That was true in the 1950s (Explorer 1016), and remains true today. Nice to see that, in returning to the 36mm after a brief period of abandonment, Rolex got the memo... "If it ain't broke, don't fix it". Somewhat reminiscent of the Coke Classic/New Coke debacle of the 1990s. My other grail is a 43-year-old Pepsi GMT-Master (16750) at just a hair under 40mm, and my wrist is equally comfortable wearing either the 36mm Explorer or the 40mm GMT.
I dont want to give people the wrong impression. Its small, but as you and I know, it's absolutely perfect. Enjoy and wear it in good health!
Coolest rolex imo much better than the explorer 2
It looks smaller in person vs. video. I think the idea that a sub is "look at me" is in your mind. Most people dont know or care what watch we are weating. And if they are, who cares what they thingk....you should be wearing what you like, not worry what other people think. I think 38mm would be the sweet spot for explorer and other rolex sport watches. There is no right or wrong, it's whatever you like is the right watch.
You're right, most people don't give a shit :p
Pfffffff.....dude ....please
14 minutes rambling about "it is a small watch" (kinda disrespectful to the one who gave it to you btw) and FINALY on the wrist at 14:00.
I do realize that my videos need more of the watch, and the talking head is a bit much for too long.
@aussieexpatwatches thanks for the reaction 😄...and just a tip: more wrist time. After all, That's what most people come for. To see how a watch looks on a wrist. If I had a youtube channel about watches I would show the watch on the wrist with different looks. For example, wearing a t-shirt, a suit, a longsleeve shirt and a sweater. I haven't seen any watch channel do that while again....i guess that's one of the main reasons to visit "how does it look on a wrist" ....( I don't have the amount of watches to start a youtube channel, just one $155 watch 😂 so that would be boring real quick.....
All the best to you buddy.
James Bond watch wasn’t an Explorer.
Oyster Perpetual.
Well the explorer is also an oyster perpetual 😆 but anyway theres no difinitive answer. The main hint is that ian flemming wore an explorer.
Its a fictional character anyway 😆
Hi Aussie - thanks for your open minded review of the Explorer 36- as I like the classic wrist watch sizes 34mm and 36mm I‘m also considering a 36mm Explorer. Would you you consider it still appropriate for a gentleman with a 7 inch wrist ? ( I‘m one of them🙂) - May I know your wristsize to have a better idea regarding your video- thank you
You really have to try it yourself and if it sings to you. Im not a big believer in wearing a watch for your wrist size but there are extremes.
@@aussieexpatwatches Dear Aussie - thank you fir this honest reply - and I agree - the best way to find out is to try it on your own wrist - but there we are again with this availability problem of Rolex …
My wrist size is 7.1". Should I get a 40 or 36...
Air King is nicer at 40mm imo.
Tons of wrist presence for a 36 for sure
Perfect watch and size for my 6.5" wrist. Would love the newer Sub, but definitely looks too big on my wrist, for my taste - will look to try on an older model sub to see how it looks.
The difference between thee subs is less that .3mm i think. The 41mm may wear better due to the wider 21mm bracelet.
Maybe an 11 series daytona at 38mm 😀
sounds good - my other go to is the speedmaster reduced, my first nice watch. thanks@@aussieexpatwatches
@@davidpeluso8582 have you tried that regular moonwatch speedy? I find they do a lot with it to make it wear like a 40mm. It wears very well.
Explorer 36 è perfetto , il 39 sembra una padella come OP 41 e datejust 41.. venduti entrambi , sono troppo grandi. 40-41 solo daytona gmt o submariner gli altri no.
Buy exp 40 to avoid this question…
Or get an AK.
How many links missing for 114 grams?
3 links removed if i recall.
Loving your videos, just curious about why you wear gloves to show the watches. Isn’t this watches in your collection that you also regularly wear?
Im just doing it so they arent just smudged for the video. I mean, wearing the watch i handle it less than I do in a 10m video.
Thanks! Great videos.
The gloves provide a nice contrast…and look cool to boot!
Still waiting to hear the good news from my AD regarding my request for the 36mm rolex Explorer. It’s been a long time coming😅
Good luck!
Thanks. It did cross my mind to visit the grey market dealer and enquire about the 36mm Explorer at Singapore in early September. The only issue I’m facing with is telling apart from the genuine and the fake Rolex explorer .
@@johnnytan5195 I wish that part was simpler. At least the explorer is a single model, you don't also have to worry if the watch is real, then also the dialed swapped like the OPs.
Thanks heap mate!👍🏻
That's an amazing look timepiece.
I loved the 124270 when I had it but that taper killed it for me. Granted I have a much larger wrist at 7.25-7.5 depending on the amount of pizza consumed. Seeing it on you in person, I think it fits you perfectly (and makes me wonder how you can wear an exp2 😂)
I waited 2 years on Rolex fairy list for this 36mm exp , im glad I did. In that time the Tudor BB54 came out, and I picked one up that was available in the window. Safe to say I don't need an exp 1 anymore.
The BB, I agree, is a better looking watch, more to look at. And a superb piece 100%.
That's strange. An Explorer 1 is a walk-in watch. I waited for less than a week before I got the call (I never had a purchase history with this AD in Sydney). I guess I was lucky. I love the Explorer 1, I don't wear my BB58 as much now.
A BB54 is definitely on my list, or a Pelagos 39.
I've got both and I must say that I like the BB54, but I just love the 124270. It's all personal preference of course.
@@aussieexpatwatchesbut didn’t you say in the video how the Exp just blows away the BB58 and looks much higher quality? You’re saying the 54 looks better than the Exp?
@@MrQuadraaa Looks and quality are not the same thing in my book. The explorer is hard to match in terms of quality in my opinion. But the BB58 is by far one of the most appealing watches out there.
I wouldn't ultimately be choosing one or the other. It would be a tough choice.
i tried the 39 on my small wrist and it felt perfect. 36 is too small
Too small, boring and bland looks
So cringe lmao
Excellent sports watch for the ladies.
Ice burn.
Sounds like someone who needs to compensate
Not for gorillas definitely