Will the New Revenue Sharing Model Help Keep FSU & Clemson in the Conference? | David Teel
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 19 ก.ย. 2024
- David Teel Richmond Times-Dispatch joins 365 Sports to discuss his thoughts on the recent news coming out of the ACC, will the new revenue sharing help keep FSU & Clemson in the conference, his thoughts on the ACC through week 3 of the season, and more.
This Segment is Sponsored by Victory Tailgate. Visit our friends at victorytailgate.pxf.io/y21JVD for all your outdoor needs, tailgate, backyard BBQ, or beach day. Win it all with Victory!
Get Your Gameday Gear: t.ly/j1ViN
Follow us on Twitter at @365SportsYT and Instagram at @365sportsradio! Also find podcast versions of our show on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, and many other podcast sources!
Looking for unique perspective on all sports? 365 Sports will quickly become your favorite sports channel to subscribe to!
Smart move on the ACC to work out unequal tv revenue sharing with FSU and CU. Even if the conference gets $100 million after settlement, that's not enough to make up for the lost ratings which would tank the conference's value well beyond $100 million.
The conference can survive through 2030 and *hopefully* have a plan by then - maybe merge with the Big 12 or poach some new teams for the big power realignment on the horizon.
It’s a temporary bandaid and isn’t conducive to any long term recovery.
Want more money? Win games. ACC needs fans in stadiums and for the ACC to win OOC games. VT losing to Vandy takes the shine off of Cal’s win over Auburn or Miami’s domination of Florida. Clemson got demolished by UGA and needs to rebound. BC lost a heartbreaker but can beat MSU. VT needs to beat Rutgers. Watching uva lose to Maryland is bad but seeing the sky cam showing the upper decks empty is embarrassing. Is this collective group can’t put quality product on the field and sell tickets, then no money is coming. This goes for you too FSU. The “chop” isn’t effective or intimidating when 60% of the stadium is empty!
I don't see how this satisfies them. Win to get more or depend on fickle fan interest to get more? Does Vanderbilt or Rutgers or Northwestern need to win to get their huge paycheck? Or boost their tv ratings? Nope. They get it by virtue of just existing in their privileged conference. There is the 'haves and have nots'. I don't see how becoming one of the 'might haves' is enough.
No