8:41 The whole purpose of him being there with a camera is to TEST your reaction to the camera and your knowledge of the 1st Amendment which is part of the SUPREME LAW aka the Constitution of a Republic - you clearly failed to realize this. The ironic thing about it is that the building has its own camera system filming everyone whether they give permission or not!
"There's a lot of bad people out there who videotape children. Is that your intent?" Those two sentences just don't logically go together. Dysfunctional. The children. WOO! Is there not also a lot of GOOD people who videotape children? I guess that woman is the world's sole decider on the matter.
"Our children" ... Recently CPS returned a child to the parent and told him, since the child did not have a social security number the child wasn't theirs (the states).
I agree...... but when it comes to children, who are already having a hard time, or they wouldn't be at DHS, then yes, the children should not be filmed INSIDE the building.... just out of human respect. Just because you CAN does not mean you SHOULD.... when children are involved.
yes you can video in public but if a person is going in to a public ,private or federal builds. you need to get their permission.or it is consider stalking
francis braucci Sorry but that is not true... if you are in public, you have no right to expect privacy... if filming or photographing from a public space... anything you can see with the camera is "fair game" people or buildings.
I do believe he’s an older guy and who knows he may have breathing problems or COPD or something but he still out there and he still doing it he still standing up for his rights and that’s what you have to give him credit for
Sorry but people even children do not have any right to privacy in public areas period. Am sick of 'it's for the children' bullshit. That does not trump the constitution rights of others
robert west I'm 100% in favor of everyone exercising their first amendment rights. However , when that female staffer said there was children's confidentiality involved I think you should have backed off. Not because you had to, but as a matter of simple decency.. No one would have thought less of you.
Did you see any children in the video? Or are you upset that you didn't? Tell us why you are disappointed in this regard. Please explain in great detail.
Samuel Lane, I believe you are correct...DHS, as in Department of Health Services, each county uses a different moniker. In California, many counties refer to it as DHHS, Department of Health & Human Services. Either way, it is a portion of CPS Child Protective Service that I think he is filming. Children by in large are protected individuals and are not subject to disclosure to the public, especially if they are in CPS care or are wards of the State. Public venue and photography is different than in custody or under the care of... As long as it is not specific photography and with intent, it's okay.
i get and respect first amendment audits. but not like this. DHS helps people, nit hurt them. they came out and just wanted to know why he was filming. i know i know, it's his rights, blah blah blah. but come on, why here? just because? kids, people who need help, what are you going to prove by doing this? bad audit dude. not cool
A first amendment audit is supposed to be informative. You are supposed to help educate people on our constitutional rights. You don't do that bad, but the places you pick are pointless. Police stations and places where police frequent seems more logical to me than a DHS office. Watch News Now Houston, High Dessert Community Watch, California Guardian. They do an awesome job. And be respectful unless they are disrespectful. It's not supposed to be a pissing contest. Like I said, you do ok just need some work on attitude and such.
I always support the freedom but this is a shitty act. Many kids in the system are there because they are in danger from parents. It's really not cool. I do understand that you didn't video any kids. I hope if some had shown up, you wouldn't have recorded them.
Lenny Pappano ~ "Giving auditors a bad name." Well then, be like a good cop and get rid of the bad cop. Oh, wait, that doesn't happen. Cops don't go against one another. The same unwritten rule should apply here.
False analogy -- not to mention a lesson in missing the point. There are shitty cops and shitty auditors. This guy is a shitty auditor. That was the point.
I didn't say he had no First Amendment right to film kids. Go film them at the school playground. That's Constitutionally protected activity, as well. Go film them getting off the school bus and walk with them down the sidewalks till they get home. That's perfectly legal as well. I would hope common fuckin sense would come into play at some juncture -- no? I would never argue he doesn't have a Constitutional right to film kids anywhere in public. Of course -- we all have that right, do we not. But -- in my opinion -- it's just being a dick. And giving auditors a bad name... feel free to disagree.
No problem with filming but why do you go out of your way to film personal licence plates? These are not government property like police cars and I see no reason at all except spite for you to film them.
It's called freedom of speech or expression, exactly the same as you are trying to prove. It just seemed to be a waste of time. Why not target something worthwhile? You normally have good vids and 99% of the time I agree with you, but just not this time.
Has to be one of the most useless “audits” ever !! Not to mention your heavy breathing while leisurely walking. So interesting seeing you record license plates. B O R I N G !!!!!!
I agree with a number of others that have posted messages here. You are horrible auditor!! I too will STOP watching and spend my time viewing those channels that actually do some good.
Why do ALL govt employees think they are the LAW.....
8:41 The whole purpose of him being there with a camera is to TEST your reaction to the camera and your knowledge of the 1st Amendment which is part of the SUPREME LAW aka the Constitution of a Republic - you clearly failed to realize this.
The ironic thing about it is that the building has its own camera system filming everyone whether they give permission or not!
"There's a lot of bad people out there who videotape children. Is that your intent?" Those two sentences just don't logically go together. Dysfunctional. The children. WOO! Is there not also a lot of GOOD people who videotape children? I guess that woman is the world's sole decider on the matter.
im sorry ppl. but this man creepy uncontrollably laugh is scary af!!
orders from unidentified people
Robert---Keep it up. You are doing your part to desensitize people to the use of cameras in public. And please do not stop breathing.
I LOVE THE BIT WHERE SHE SAYS YOU CAN'T FILM & THERE IS A FIXED CAMERA ABOVE HER HEAD. LOL.
"Our children" ... Recently CPS returned a child to the parent and told him, since the child did not have a social security number the child wasn't theirs (the states).
I take pictures of license plates too, but really mainly only if they're personalized. I collect images of those special plates just for fun.
Because their policy trumps the Constitution?
/yeah, no.
Filming in public is legal, it's as simple as that.
Those who do not wish to be filmed, should stay away from public areas.
I agree...... but when it comes to children, who are already having a hard time, or they wouldn't be at DHS, then yes, the children should not be filmed INSIDE the building.... just out of human respect. Just because you CAN does not mean you SHOULD.... when children are involved.
yes you can video in public but if a person is going in to a public ,private or federal builds. you need to get their permission.or it is consider stalking
francis braucci Sorry but that is not true... if you are in public, you have no right to expect privacy... if filming or photographing from a public space... anything you can see with the camera is "fair game" people or buildings.
if one is going into a building then that,s consider stalking.please read the first ademdment
No, it's not. Stalking is deliberately following someone..... not taking someone's photograph as they happen to walk through a door IN PUBLIC VIEW.
That's really cute. You found something you can do that annoys people and that they can't stop you from doing so you get to feel powerful.
Lol, even the Bird's are raising hell in the background too.
I do believe he’s an older guy and who knows he may have breathing problems or COPD or something but he still out there and he still doing it he still standing up for his rights and that’s what you have to give him credit for
Sorry but people even children do not have any right to privacy in public areas period. Am sick of 'it's for the children' bullshit.
That does not trump the constitution rights of others
This doesn’t even pretend to be an audit!......simply provocative!,
I'm not trying to do anything. I'm doing it!
I sign for the "Self-suffiency" reception area at a fucking government facility. Fucking priceless.
i love this guy.. he can bearly speak !!!
interesting =)
Living in oregon we called it crack of my ass county.
lol that is the first time I have seen a _no chewing tobacco_ sign
What kind of camera are you using? Very good picture.
Dang, just saw your reflection. Apparently its a cell phone.
I wouldn't video any kids. Because that is kind of creepy!
www.google.com/url?sa=i&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwjU2_yZ_cXcAhUGQ6wKHeV_CWYQjhx6BAgBEAM&url=http%3A%2F%2Farchive.bluelivesmatter.blue%2Fcop-blocker-harasses-portland-cop%2F&psig=AOvVaw3EWB6JTfBJ953k7BHpEp_x&ust=1533011015415181
Robert... you go to the edge.... pretty fucking cool, you do have a lot of trolls watching your channel...
trolls are a good thing so are subscribers
isn't it up to these people to "care for the kids"?
Next time, try not to breath so much, get people's name and don't make that sound please
Todd From Iowa sorry I dont support worthless fat pedophiles
Todd From Iowa Here you are watching this type of video .... telling someone not to be 'mean' to this man . WHat happen to freedom of speech ???
Well done.
Good job as usual bob! Thank you!
foia req the security camera records
Her worry does not trump my rights Go kick rocks😂😂😂😂😂
Our children? Ok , lets brain wash our children.
very true the state makes a lot of money for these kids in foster care give them back to there parents and work with them
robert west I'm 100% in favor of everyone exercising their first amendment rights. However , when that female staffer said there was children's confidentiality involved I think you should have backed off. Not because you had to, but as a matter of simple decency.. No one would have thought less of you.
The 1st amendment does not begin or end with your opinion Mr. Decency.
+inquisitor Right. You damn skippy.
I enjoyed your video :) Keep it up!
MisterBassBoost Were you Hoping to catch a glimpse of a child? Tell us what that does for you. Please explain in great detail.
Did you see any children in the video? Or are you upset that you didn't? Tell us why you are disappointed in this regard. Please explain in great detail.
Jerry Whitmire you talkin to me ? you talkin to me ? I don't see nobody else standin here .....lol
CPS does not care about protecting kids
Old brauds always use the children angle.
Quick sanity check here...is it illegal to video 'children' when they are out in public or visible from a public place?!!
no, it is not!
ar47yrr4p - Yes it is legal.
the question was "is it illegal to video 'children' " , my answer to his question was "no, it is not" as in no, it is not illegal!
Ben Dover, there is no expectation of privacy if you can be seen from a public place.
Interesting viewpoint...I'm not sure how something that is public can be turned private?
you filmed here eating thru the window so she got upset....
it's an okay video, but my opinion your breathing is to heavy and it takes away from the video
Mike Munoz lmao
"There's a lot of bad people out there." (Poor English. " There are MANY bad people out there.") Yeah. You're one of them.
Samuel Lane, I believe you are correct...DHS, as in Department of Health Services, each county uses a different moniker. In California, many counties refer to it as DHHS, Department of Health & Human Services. Either way, it is a portion of CPS Child Protective Service that I think he is filming. Children by in large are protected individuals and are not subject to disclosure to the public, especially if they are in CPS care or are wards of the State. Public venue and photography is different than in custody or under the care of... As long as it is not specific photography and with intent, it's okay.
If the children (or anyone) are out in public and don't want to be photographed, then bags to put over their heads should be available.
It's now 2022....No point, I just wanted to say it's 2022....AAAAAAAAGGGHHHHHHH
dude LOVE the videos but u really need to see a doctor about your breathing....
so good when they dont expect it
Debbie Barry You and MisterBassBoots should spend time together. Do you enjoy seeing people lurking around places where there are children?
selling fear?
You do have the right to film but take it away from anything to do with children.
The lady was pretty but obstinate.
dude you need to learn how to be a auditor. !!!!!!!
You need to learn grammar. We all have our drawbacks.
You are allowed around kids.......
i get and respect first amendment audits. but not like this. DHS helps people, nit hurt them. they came out and just wanted to know why he was filming. i know i know, it's his rights, blah blah blah. but come on, why here? just because? kids, people who need help, what are you going to prove by doing this? bad audit dude. not cool
I could be wrong, but it sure looks like you're on their property
A first amendment audit is supposed to be informative. You are supposed to help educate people on our constitutional rights. You don't do that bad, but the places you pick are pointless. Police stations and places where police frequent seems more logical to me than a DHS office. Watch News Now Houston, High Dessert Community Watch, California Guardian. They do an awesome job. And be respectful unless they are disrespectful. It's not supposed to be a pissing contest. Like I said, you do ok just need some work on attitude and such.
Why don't you stick to adults, rather than young kids
I know they acted like kids, but looked like adults. Where did you see kids?
hardeep gill sheep
I always support the freedom but this is a shitty act. Many kids in the system are there because they are in danger from parents. It's really not cool. I do understand that you didn't video any kids. I hope if some had shown up, you wouldn't have recorded them.
:))
Giving auditors a bad name...
The 1st amendment doesn't begin at your opinion.
yes it dose Lenny Pappano Giving auditors a bad name.'s
Lenny Pappano ~ "Giving auditors a bad name."
Well then, be like a good cop and get rid of the bad cop. Oh, wait, that doesn't happen. Cops don't go against one another. The same unwritten rule should apply here.
False analogy -- not to mention a lesson in missing the point. There are shitty cops and shitty auditors. This guy is a shitty auditor. That was the point.
I didn't say he had no First Amendment right to film kids. Go film them at the school playground. That's Constitutionally protected activity, as well. Go film them getting off the school bus and walk with them down the sidewalks till they get home. That's perfectly legal as well. I would hope common fuckin sense would come into play at some juncture -- no? I would never argue he doesn't have a Constitutional right to film kids anywhere in public. Of course -- we all have that right, do we not. But -- in my opinion -- it's just being a dick. And giving auditors a bad name... feel free to disagree.
Can't watch! TOO much grunting! Sorry!
No problem with filming but why do you go out of your way to film personal licence plates? These are not government property like police cars and I see no reason at all except spite for you to film them.
More idiots who either hate the Constitution or are too stupid to understand it.
you are not the best auditor out there and the breathing sounds like you are
about to clapp out
You really are the pits.dont go near.anywhere where there are kids at risk
Fail !! Big Time
Sorry you can’t record cats without giving treats or cops without donuts
pointless exercise?
It's called freedom of speech or expression, exactly the same as you are trying to prove. It just seemed to be a waste of time. Why not target something worthwhile? You normally have good vids and 99% of the time I agree with you, but just not this time.
poor taste
"A lot of bad people videotape children." Really doing what out in public? Stupid idiot senile old woman.
What a waste of a sperm cell........
Has to be one of the most useless “audits” ever !!
Not to mention your heavy breathing while leisurely walking.
So interesting seeing you record license plates.
B O R I N G !!!!!!
1st
Westcoast Auditors News Network you are not allowed to be first Batman😆😆
pusher iu lmao
I agree with a number of others that have posted messages here. You are horrible auditor!! I too will STOP watching and spend my time viewing those channels that actually do some good.
I have good stuff coming up