It is terrifyingly mind boggling the expanse of the universe. We are basically a microscopic world, to an already microscopic world. We are so microscopically small in the grand scheme of the universe, we basically don't even exist to it. How scary to think of, but awe inspiring. Just makes me wonder what its like past the edge of universe
I see it very differently . Billions and billion of galaxies containing no life are meaningless if there is no one to observe them. Its just a dead - meaningless space with no purpose. Life is far more valuable since this is the only way how can universe observe it self. We are made from the same material as the universe but, we can observe, change things, think, produce, dream , and so on ...we are literally a soul of the universe. Since we didn't find any evidence of life in a huge area, it looks like we are super rare !
If you assume that the whole thing is accidental and meaningless, then you are not in a position to draw the conclusion that we are insignificant without begging the question.
@@MartinMartinX billion and billions of galaxies with no life? Where in the world do you get that from? There could be other intelligent life in our own galaxy, but we don't have the technology to look at every planet and know
@@stylembonkers1094 what are you talking about? I never said we were insignificant, I said time wise, and size wise we are just a fleeting spec in an infinitely huge universe. And are you saying someone caused the big bang with meaning behind it?
In souvenir shops in Vienna I’ve seen kangaroo signs with a line across it and the caption “You are in Austria not Australia “ I wonder what nationality these are aimed at?
Although I have seen nothing about it in the papers, I saw a strange documentary once saying that someone in this century named Zefram Cochrane will invent a form of faster-than-light travel called "Warp Drive." That would certainly change a lot of what we know about the universe, offering alternative perspectives. Why isn't anyone talking about this? I distinctly remember watching that.
Let's hope it comes to fruition, who knows some advanced alien civilisation might just happen to be passing by, and by some miracle they end up forging a unique and special bond with us earthlings.
If we are so small in this universe wouldn't that mean that the observable universe that we can see would be just just as small infact it would be a speck of dust and we actually know nothing about what's really happening.
Everything Is Coming In Waves And From All Sides. Nuclear, Molecular And Cellular Layers. Modular Wave-Hierarchies. Epi-Phenomenon Of The Ground-Of-Being Of All Other Grounds-Of-Being. In A Fractal Involution, The Reversal Of Evolution, Becoming Is Absolute. Time Is Dying A Slow Death. The Eschaton Is Near. I'm Collapsing Into The Void Of This Sacramentalized Frequency. Sinking Below Its Event Horizon, I'm Plunging Into An Ideational Singularity; Propelling Towards The Neuro-Galactic Center, The Transcendental Nexus Of Self And World. A Cosmic Junction Where On A Physical Level; Matter And Anti-Matter Merge Into Each other, Into Emptiness And On A Psychic Level God And Self Are Inextricably Intertwined. The End Of The Beginning Of Contraction (Involutional Speed Up/Preparation For The Big Crunch) I'm Imploding Into Myself, My god. Oh, God. I'm Home... - Sol Niger Within, Fredrik Thordendal
The observable universe could also be a speck, in another universe. For example, picture a fish in the ocean. The fish can never know what exists outside of the ocean, and never travel the entire ocean. But the ocean is a part of the earth, and the earth is a speck in our universe. There’s no guarantee our universe as it appears to us, is not like that fish scenario, in which we are the fish.
@@alrasyidlettering1400 That's why I think it's funny religious think they'll talk to God, or get all the answers, post death. When it could just be a recycling process of things or continuation, with no answers. Just more questions.
You can travel at the speed of light in any direction forever & never come to a wall. As humans we think within the limitation of boundaries, but there simply aren't any in space as it's infinite.
My Model For The First Events in the Beginning of the Universe. (From left to right) 1. Singularity before the Big Bang was eternal photons. 2. Big Bang was a release of photon energy. 3. Photons through pair conversion, created space time; and both the fundamental particles and first atoms of hydrogen and helium. 4. The universe temperature continued to drop until the annihilation phase when all free electrons (e-) and positrons (e+) not in atoms, began to annihilate and turn into pure energy. 5. This massive universe wide conversion of mass to energy caused the inflation phase. This model suggests my answers to these physics questions. Q. What was the singularity that started the Big Bang? A. Eternal photons outside of space and time. Q. Where did the anti matter go? A. It went into the protons and neutrons. Protons have 2 positrons and one electron. Neutrons have 1 proton and one electron. Q. Why did inflation happen? A. When the temperature fell low enough, free electrons and positrons annihilated in a universal wide explosion of energy that created the inflation period.
There was no big bang, it's only a theory. The so-called experts ignore electricity. It's missing from all their equations. Plasma science = electricity, Stars are formed at pinch points along birkland currents, they know this, but admitting it, the big bang theory evaporates.
This is laughable physics I’m sorry. I started to read when I laughed at ‘eternal photons’ and stopped reading as soon as I read your belief that protons are composed of positrons and electrons? And neutrons are composed of protons? Wtf. Even your idea of inflation is totally opposite to what occurred. Inflation did not occur because the universe cooled, it was quite the opposite, the early universe inflated due to quantum fluctuations when it was very hot and very dense and small, and after inflation it began to cool. I just felt the need to correct this nonsense in case anyone reading who doesn’t have knowledge of physics is misinformed by this drivel, although if you’re getting your info from a TH-cam comment I suppose that’s a problem of it’s own.
The fact that I been saying this for ages, but was called stupid reminds me of why sometimes, as a human being, you just have to sit on the sidelines and watch everyone eventually figure everything out, because no matter how much you scream sometimes, people will never listen and you will just lose your mind. The entire idea that everything was made from nothing, just because we could only see the small picture of it all never made sense, even when you take into consideration how long light takes to cross the vast expanse of space.
In spite of all the advances and strides we have made in understanding our Universe, it’s like just exploring one grain of sand partially. Honestly, the scope and scale of the Universe or Multiverse is beyond our comprehension and understanding with the current knowledge and tools we may never be able to figure it out. Big Bang is just another theory but not necessarily the truth as how the Universe as we know originated.
In time, I believe humans are capable of deciphering the deeper workings of the Universe. Sad to say that we may not have that time. We are too war like & destructive & most likely, we will destroy ourselves long before we evolve well enough to understand to Universe.
@@audience7264 Yeshua, the Son of Yahweh, will return to the earth soon and set up His glorious Kingdom. I know there are faithful disciples of the King of kings reading this comment. Speak up and encourage your brothers and sisters. Now is not the time to be silent. We need each other as the awaited day draws near.
@jshonio6443 Jesus Christ the son of man said that which has the face of Caesar on it give it to Caesar that which has God's face on it give to God I never saw Yeshua for Yahweh are Yeezy claim to be to be the son of God nor the Jews or the ewe's and certainly not Netanyahuwoowoo, And bidendoodoo 😂 to think that those fools call him something else is cuckoo, yea though we recognize and accept Iesus Nephalim Reaganum Iudas Died on the cross. ✝️
I remember when professor Brian Cox that the universe is 1400000000years old and he changed his mind all scientists must justify their obscene salaries
If one could possibly travel to the end of all this, what would be there, nothing or something else? You could go crazy trying to figure all this out, it is just beyond comprehension.
I can understand this because often I have wondered how any thing can exist at all even a single atom. How can something appear from nothing? If only my bank balance could do that. :)
I read a paper about 20 years ago about how our observable universe, about 6 billion years ago, suddenly slowed down uniformly, everywhere. Then about a billion years or so later, sped up, everywhere at once and continues on its hyper speed. Whatever entity/agency is responsible for its creation is so far beyond our understanding we are left coping by vague anthropomorphism. Its a puzzle presented to any potential sentient species to navigate. We have to defeat our desire to kill each other over baubles first, which I don't think we can do. Still, its fantastic to simply try to comprehend the potentials it represents. Its really too much. I think its potential would lead us into how to escape it on truly long time lines, before entropy shuts it down.
The universe may be vast, but not infinite. Infinity is an abstract mathematical concept with no confirmation in the physical world. If there are no infinitely small things (approaching zero), there cannot be infinitely large things, that is one divided by zero.
I am tempted to think of a fly sitting on a grain of sand in the desert, attempting to explain the World to another fly. (We have to assume a conversational ability here but, hey, it just a concept!) How about a tiny insect with a life span of 2 hours sitting on a mushroom? How do they perceive the world?
Our senses are tuned by evolution to focus on human sized things and to ensure our survival in the world. For this reason we cannot use 'common sense' or intuition to learn about scales much larger than us or much smaller. Hence science uses experiments, evidence and mathematics to learn about the fundamentals of nature.
To those discussing God in the role of creation, I would refer you Professor Cox who has said cosmology neither proves nor disproves God. We can have an opinion one way or the other, but to dismiss someone else’s belief without proof is as foolish as claiming that you know the correct answer to the origin of the universe - both views are unproven.
A finite universe and an infinite universe are inconceivable to me. A universe that always was and and a universe that had a beginning is inconceivable to me. I feel like an ant crawling on the earth, aware of the sun but no idea what it is.
In comparison to ants, we are even smaller in contrast to the whole universe. Just as an ant will never be able to see the entire planet on it's own, we will never know just how big the universe is, let alone how it began. To even try to figure it out is hubris
8:53 _"Nothing from our location could ever reach the edge nor could anything from the edge reach us"_ Replace 'reach' with 'observe' and you are right. Due to time dilation and length contraction it _is_ possible to travel to every place in the universe. Consider, that, at the speed of light every length (in the direction of movement) shrinks to zero. Yes we aren't massless and therefore won't be able to travel @ the speed of light, but if we one day travel _nearly_ at the speed of light, the distance to any target shrinks to _nearly_ zero.
@@piehound Maybe when people presented this eternal beauty and its secrets it will distract them from doing petty things like starting a war, harming others. Wake up their internal explorers and childish curious minds. What do you think?
@@piehound Some people do horrible things just to left a mark in history books, a legacy, they'll realize that in the vastness of the Universe that's just petty peace of crap.
@@piehound It is petty when you project it to the entire Universe. Hell the entire history of humanity is nothing compared to the possible eternity of the Universe.
@@man.i.literally.failed6772you realize that NASA's budget is a tiny fraction of what the US spends in military spendings right? 33B vs nearly a trillion USD.
One aspect I don't understand about photons is that if a photon departs from a star, it never stops, because we see photons that departed one year ago, one million years ago or 13 billion years ago. Like if it had an infinite amount of "fuel" or kinetic energy.
Think of it as a constant copy of itself with just the information over to the next. A full blown copy would also copy the degradation or loss of "fuel" while the information copy is more like changing car to one that has a full tank and move on.
Photons do not exist until they interact with something. Prior to that, photons exist simply as probabilities. Probabilities propagate by rules of pure mathematics, not physical objects. No fuel or energy is expended to make them travel.
We have an innate intuition about physics, that serves us very well in day to day life. But it does not need to account for physics that only affects things that are much smaller or much larger, or move much faster than us. So we have the bias that things natural state is not moving. This bias was so strong that it took the greatest mind in human history of Newton, to postulate the near opposite. The natural state is that things keep a constant velocity unless acted on. So if something starts moving one has to figure out why it stopped moving not why it kept moving.
Isn't it just great how all these believers are so full of certainty without even the smallest bit of evidence for their gods and made bugger all progress in thousands of years, while scientists are full of questions, doubt and uncertainty, yet they've progressed farther in just a few decades than ever before throughout human history. I think it's time for religions to come up with something groundbreaking because what they've got to show just isn't aging well.
Even with a space telescope, how is it possible to detect a photon over 40 billion lightyears away? I know space expanding and all that jazz, but how could a light photon make it it all the way to us to be detected when the amount of time that the universe itself has existed is less than half of the time that photon would take the photon to get here? 🤯
Because that photon wasn't 40 billion light years away when it was emitted.But since the time it was emitted, its been traveling "upstream" to get to us as the space itself is continuously expanding at an exponential rate the further out you look. Therefore, for all we know, the real size of the universe could be millions of times bigger than we currently estimate.We know for sure there are definitely galaxies we will never see they were always too far away from us to ever get their photons here at light speed.The expansion rate is way way faster than light that far away and therefore they will never reach us.
Imagine you have a piece of thin rubber 1 inch by 1 inch. You have a marker and are asked to draw a line from one end of the square to the other side. While you draw the line someone stretches the balloon by all four corners. Then you're asked how long your line is. Your line is now 24 inches long even though the square was 1 inch. Same thing with the universe. It's been expanding since the start.
I'm beginning to realize the universe was this vast empty space (beyond our comprehension) that had several big bangs that occurred within it. Our big bang might be the most recent.
The wonder is why the so-called experts ignore electricity. It's missing from all their equations. Plasma science = electricity, Stars are formed at pinch points along birkland currents, they know this, but admitting it, the so-called big bang theory evaporates.
There are trillions of galaxies, & each containing billions of stars. What are the chances of another solar system that is structured just like ours? Pretty good odds that there are multiple.
That visualization of the Doppler effect was actually pretty good. I knew what it is but never visualized it that way. I always imagined the train example thats always used.
All these people lost in the comments scoffing at God. You'll soon be shown the truth. Without God you'll have to find out how something came from nothing and where that came from and where that came from, you'll always go through life with this as your curse wondering your purpose and your origin. God ALWAYS was ALWAYS will be. An INFINITE being with NO beginning or end. God is ETERNAL.
Space is actually way easier to explore than the ocean. When they find out how to do that then I'll be impressed. They are just throwing telescopes and measurement devices into the cosmos
@JudePhilips no lol 😅 just not impressed by the space stuff anymore. I was really intrigued I mean like obsessed for the longest. Nothing ever comes out of it but more questions and anything we discover will always only be a picture. We arent reaching these places physically its impossible. So while they are throwing tons of money at space exploration we are on the brink of WWIII and America is in "debt" supposedly when I doubt that because we print money that has no physical backing, it's all fiat currency ay the end of the day. Just find it funny that these people ate supposed to be so smart but about what? Propulsion and different waves of lighting? Maybe some mapping among the gravitional fields so as to not hit anything? Which probably wouldn't happen if you just shot it out randomly cause it's so small compared to these vast distances between planets moon's and whatever else is out there it wouldn't hit em anyway. Idk just wish they would spend time and money on Earth not taking pictures of the universe.
I can't help but think we might be missing something on the expansion of the universe. It appears to be expanding at the same rate in every direction we look, as if we are in the very center of the universe. I have not read, or seen any videos, that satisfactorily explain that, to my feeble mind, anyway. Also, nothing, in our relative vicinity, is moving away from us. As a matter of fact, we are told that the Andromeda galaxy and our Milky Way, are converging, and will collide in about 5 billion years.
space it self is expanding. ie the space between all the galaxy's is expanding. So say you were on a plant in a distance galaxy , from that prospective everything in every direction would still be expanding away from you.
It’ll be very challenging to find out since it really depends on your perspective relative to where you are in space. We just don’t have enough reference points.
TIME itself may yet be way more interesting than SPACE & what is to be found within it. If our UNIVERSE is the be all & end all then indeed TIME OCCURRED (of a sort) PROPERLY when our Universe showed up somehow? be it the BIG BANG or CREATED by someone? or some thing? but what if other Worlds / Universes / Realms existed before ours...then...can you imagine TIME beginning way before ours....WHAT HISTORY DOES THAT TIME HOLD...Wouldn't I like to know!
I see what you’re trying to say, but it’s the most explainable by way of findings/evidence so far than anything else. A LOT to learn still, but measurement of distance and light is probable math.
Somewhere on earth, there is an Ant sitting on a rock...observing all that it knows. All that it knows can never embrace the true size of the planet, or the complexity of existence that exists all around it. A Hiker sits on a rock and squishes the ant, looking up at the sky in wonder. I have no doubt there is more than we will ever know....and if there is a truly alien life...communicating to us might be just as effective as trying to teach an Ant to speak French.
I find this theory to be the one most suited to my brain... It at the very least answers for me what was there before the big bang... it was a big crunch... maybe the first... maybe the trillionth.. When we speak of time on that scale.. anything is possible...
The narrator talks with what can be assumed with great knowledge and experience. In actuality, the narrator is making guesses supported with speculations.
I can't express enough how grateful I am for your channel. Your videos have helped me understand complex scientific concepts in an easily digestible way
I recall Conan Doyle through Holmes saying, "Watson, it makes no difference to me whether we go around the sun or the sun goes around the earth." Good point, do you not agree?
The more they discover the more they move further away from knowing. I think if mankind ever found out the Origin of the Universe, the enormity of that knowledge would bring about the end of Humanity. Some things are better not to know.😮
Very interesting video and theories. Can't help thinking though that the computer simulation 'theory' is the most ridiculous concept of them all ! More strange is how this 'theory' ever got the 'legs' to ever be taken seriously!!
There was no big bang, it's only a theory. The so-called experts ignore electricity. It's missing from all their equations. Plasma science = electricity, Stars are formed at pinch points along birkland currents, they know this, but admitting it, the big bang theory evaporates.
Ridiculous maybe, but could also the most probable. If we are ever able to create artificial intelligence and a virtual universe for it, what reason would we have to believe that we were the first civilization to do so? The likelihood that we too (or only you) are living inside a simulator becomes very high, close to certainty. It would not change your life in any way, however.
Any theory which talks about endless cycles, or the infinity of physical entities is not a scientific theory because there isn't any possibility of proving that infinity of anything exists.
Pictures showing so many galaxy does not mean they are all still existing actually, the light is a proof that it used to exist long time ago depending of distance but it is not a proof that it still exist now.
I have never understood why people insist on equating the Big Bang with the origin of the universe, when all we can say is that it began to expand at the BB. Two completely different things. We know from Noether's Theorem combined with Energy Conservation that time is symmetrical, ie there is no special point in time, so no beginning and no end. So the best bet seems to me to be a universe that has no beginning or end either in time or space, with flat Euclidean geometry (with dimples). The advantage of this is that it is very simple, with no need to explain how it started because it didn't.
Sage Vasishta tells this to lord Rama." Hai Ram the secret of the origin of the universe will remain an unresolved mystery for mankind.. Because the universe is not physically real ".
If the universe existed before the big bang, but the big bang has been disproved so it never happened, then we are left with the universe existed.....period.
I'll never understand why all these deep dives leave out a possibility that strikes me as obvious. Our lack of understanding may not simply reflect a lack of empirical evidence. We may simply lack the capacity to understand regardless of the state of the evidence.
At 20.03, before and after, that is, the Oscillating Universe speculation (not theory, because there is, so far, no way to test it) is what I've always considered the most likely nature of our Universe. Expansion, followed by a cusp stage, and then contraction, followed by another cusp phase, and expansion again. No "creation" moment, it's just always existed in one form or another. This of course doesn't change the fact that the existence of the Universe is a great mystery and will forever enthrall intelligent beings such as ourselves, and probably others, in the Cosmos.
Pls educate me, why are we mixing the multi universe concept to the question if the universe infinite? An infinite universe does not automatically means multi universe is true, right?
We all know that now without the need for scientists to tell us. Roger Penrose has been saying that long before Brian Cox. What we need to hear is the admission by scientists that it is not possible anymore to theorize about the "absolute" beginning, that there is no such thing.
Unless infinity is something other than infinite, there's no such thing as a limited universe, in space, time, or anything else. But if our universe is limited, there has to be an infinite number of other universes, with infinite variety. The human mind can scarcely conceive infinity, but nothing makes sense without it.
The way we commonly use language, anything can be a thing, including ideas. Infinity is a concept, but with the minds we humans possess, I think it's the only concept of the totality of existence that makes sense. If the totality of existence is different than what we think of as infinity, then so be it. But we only have the minds we have to figure things out, so that's what we use, and why necessarily assume we don't understand what to us seems to make sense? Is my point. But I'm not sure you're saying anything different. @@jd9119
I just don't believe there's no external infinite space already. How can there be a place *without* a *space* at all? How do you even *imagine* such a "void"? It's easer to imagine an infinite space that was there already forever.
In British English, an American billion is called 1000 million. In British English a billion = one million x one million so in American English would be a trillion = 1000 billion. This is serious mismatch between British and American English in astronomy and soon shopping at the supermarket.
In other words - there was no beginning and therefore there is no end either - the universe is born and expands then contracts and dies and is then re-born again with another "big-bang" and so it continues like this for ever more.
The universe isn't expanding. It is at least 93 billion light years away. We have no way of testing the accuracy of the Doplar effect on light which has traveled billions of light-years through space and time.
obviously your atoms are not moving away from each other, but if all space is expanding then is it safe to say your atoms are moving towards each other at the same speed as the space is expanding?
Just a correction: 0 times infinity is clearly 0 and nothing else. Because the multiplication operator means that you add the left number that many times as is written on the right. 0 times 2 = 0 + 0 = 0. 0 times 3 = 0 + 0 + 0 = 0. 0 times infinity = 0 + 0 + 0 ...... = still 0.
Time to change terminology! The Universe is not the stars that we see, it is the container of the stars that we see. In my own uneducated and humble opinion, the Universe is eternal and infinite. If I were to elaborate on this thought, I'd say that the universe is in a constant routine of exchanging the states of energy and matter. Infinite and eternal... how many times in how many millennia or billlenia has there been a different collection of stars and planets with entirely different beings? And how many have disappeared? Or merely exist beyond our sight.
20:30 Big Crunch : a theory similar to a throwing boomerang. which if the boomerang take no or less casualties, it eventually circles back to it's original cast / source of kickstart Big Slurp : On the other hand, resemble a curtain or a globe of hemisphere or somewhat Atmospheric Curtain to fade like a Depleting Giant rugby ball running out of Air Energy and Gradually fading away like a curtain suddenly losing it's gravitational bone structure or somewhat like a skyscraper, when you suddenly make metal beam ( acting as gravity bone ) to vanished, you will get a crumbling down curtain sort of in effects
We really don't know how many of the stars we see are still there. We see them as they were millions and billions of years ago. They may have burned out long ago.
I thought the James Webb telescope confirmed what was first seen with the Hubble telescope that disproves universe expansion. You know distant galaxies would appear larger due to the expansion of space. However observed distant galaxies don't appear larger.
and this is why i belive without a doubt that we are not the only intelligent self aware life out there. it would be ignorant and absurd for us to think otherwise.
what is it that we call the universe ? the problem with the conception of infinity is that, we could debate on it indefinitely . we will probably never be able see the "limit" of the universe because we will always find something behind what we see . if there's only a huge void then what's beyond that void ?
Conformal cyclic cosmology is not what this video says it is. It has nothing to do with black hole cosmology, a Big Crunch or a torus shaped universe which was on screen for some reason.
*WHY having such annoying repetitive music spoiling such a fascinating topic! Is there a version WITHOUT IT?! I would love to listen to this again but can't bear with that damn track behind!*
When we "Peter out," we just simply enter another life form (automatically). Life takes many shapes, sizes, colors, and intelligence. The cycle of life is infinity. It's energy. 👽
Infinity is smallness, how many times can you cut a piece of paper , theoretically it cannot be cut down to oneness, its more eternal than the universe
I'm still trying to unravel the mystery of women. I'll get to the cosmos after that.
I would start with unraveling the mystery of the cosmos. Then you'll have at least a chance to start on your second quest ;-)
@@midiprog2266 You are most definitely correct there!
Forget women. They are waste of time. Focus on cosmos
I would capitulate on the first and move on to the more dicipherable second........
What are you on about
It is terrifyingly mind boggling the expanse of the universe. We are basically a microscopic world, to an already microscopic world. We are so microscopically small in the grand scheme of the universe, we basically don't even exist to it. How scary to think of, but awe inspiring. Just makes me wonder what its like past the edge of universe
@@danielohern6953 nothing has retarded the progression of humanity more than religion
I see it very differently . Billions and billion of galaxies containing no life are meaningless if there is no one to observe them. Its just a dead - meaningless space with no purpose. Life is far more valuable since this is the only way how can universe observe it self. We are made from the same material as the universe but, we can observe, change things, think, produce, dream , and so on ...we are literally a soul of the universe. Since we didn't find any evidence of life in a huge area, it looks like we are super rare !
If you assume that the whole thing is accidental and meaningless, then you are not in a position to draw the conclusion that we are insignificant without begging the question.
@@MartinMartinX billion and billions of galaxies with no life? Where in the world do you get that from? There could be other intelligent life in our own galaxy, but we don't have the technology to look at every planet and know
@@stylembonkers1094 what are you talking about? I never said we were insignificant, I said time wise, and size wise we are just a fleeting spec in an infinitely huge universe. And are you saying someone caused the big bang with meaning behind it?
Minor correction, Christian Doppler was Austrian not Australian. Love the channel and great video!
😅 😅😅😅 😅😅 😅 😅 😅
… nearly the same, though …
In souvenir shops in Vienna I’ve seen kangaroo signs with a line across it and the caption “You are in Austria not Australia “
I wonder what nationality these are aimed at?
You can't expect these poor Americans to be able to tell those apart. Too damn hard.
Its about astronomy guys. Anything more precise than ‚earth‘ can not be expected.
Although I have seen nothing about it in the papers, I saw a strange documentary once saying that someone in this century named Zefram Cochrane will invent a form of faster-than-light travel called "Warp Drive." That would certainly change a lot of what we know about the universe, offering alternative perspectives. Why isn't anyone talking about this? I distinctly remember watching that.
Well done, sir.
You dummy!! That doesn't happen for another 200 yrs!! Good GRIEF!!! 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Boy what😂
Let's hope it comes to fruition, who knows some advanced alien civilisation might just happen to be passing by, and by some miracle they end up forging a unique and special bond with us earthlings.
I watched that also. Thank you for bringing it up
If we are so small in this universe wouldn't that mean that the observable universe that we can see would be just just as small infact it would be a speck of dust and we actually know nothing about what's really happening.
Everything Is Coming In Waves And From All Sides.
Nuclear, Molecular And Cellular Layers. Modular Wave-Hierarchies.
Epi-Phenomenon Of The Ground-Of-Being Of All Other Grounds-Of-Being.
In A Fractal Involution, The Reversal Of Evolution, Becoming Is Absolute.
Time Is Dying A Slow Death. The Eschaton Is Near. I'm Collapsing Into The Void Of This Sacramentalized Frequency. Sinking Below Its Event Horizon, I'm Plunging Into An Ideational Singularity; Propelling Towards The Neuro-Galactic Center, The Transcendental Nexus Of Self And World.
A Cosmic Junction Where On A Physical Level; Matter And Anti-Matter Merge Into Each other, Into Emptiness And On A Psychic Level God And Self Are Inextricably Intertwined.
The End Of The Beginning Of Contraction (Involutional Speed Up/Preparation For The Big Crunch)
I'm Imploding Into Myself, My god. Oh, God. I'm Home...
- Sol Niger Within, Fredrik Thordendal
The observable universe could also be a speck, in another universe. For example, picture a fish in the ocean. The fish can never know what exists outside of the ocean, and never travel the entire ocean. But the ocean is a part of the earth, and the earth is a speck in our universe. There’s no guarantee our universe as it appears to us, is not like that fish scenario, in which we are the fish.
in short Yes... we know very little about the Universe. but most scientist think we know a lot 😮
@@alrasyidlettering1400nope, what we don't know always decreases.
@@alrasyidlettering1400 That's why I think it's funny religious think they'll talk to God, or get all the answers, post death. When it could just be a recycling process of things or continuation, with no answers. Just more questions.
You can travel at the speed of light in any direction forever & never come to a wall. As humans we think within the limitation of boundaries, but there simply aren't any in space as it's infinite.
My Model For The First Events in the Beginning of the Universe.
(From left to right)
1. Singularity before the Big Bang was eternal photons.
2. Big Bang was a release of photon energy.
3. Photons through pair conversion, created space time; and both the fundamental particles and first atoms of hydrogen and helium.
4. The universe temperature continued to drop until the annihilation phase when all free electrons (e-) and positrons (e+) not in atoms, began to annihilate and turn into pure energy.
5. This massive universe wide conversion of mass to energy caused the inflation phase.
This model suggests my answers to these physics questions.
Q. What was the singularity that started the Big Bang?
A. Eternal photons outside of space and time.
Q. Where did the anti matter go?
A. It went into the protons and neutrons. Protons have 2 positrons and one electron. Neutrons have 1 proton and one electron.
Q. Why did inflation happen?
A. When the temperature fell low enough, free electrons and positrons annihilated in a universal wide explosion of energy that created the inflation period.
There was no big bang, it's only a theory. The so-called experts ignore electricity. It's missing from all their equations. Plasma science = electricity, Stars are formed at pinch points along birkland currents, they know this, but admitting it, the big bang theory evaporates.
This is laughable physics I’m sorry. I started to read when I laughed at ‘eternal photons’ and stopped reading as soon as I read your belief that protons are composed of positrons and electrons? And neutrons are composed of protons? Wtf.
Even your idea of inflation is totally opposite to what occurred. Inflation did not occur because the universe cooled, it was quite the opposite, the early universe inflated due to quantum fluctuations when it was very hot and very dense and small, and after inflation it began to cool. I just felt the need to correct this nonsense in case anyone reading who doesn’t have knowledge of physics is misinformed by this drivel, although if you’re getting your info from a TH-cam comment I suppose that’s a problem of it’s own.
The fact that I been saying this for ages, but was called stupid reminds me of why sometimes, as a human being, you just have to sit on the sidelines and watch everyone eventually figure everything out, because no matter how much you scream sometimes, people will never listen and you will just lose your mind. The entire idea that everything was made from nothing, just because we could only see the small picture of it all never made sense, even when you take into consideration how long light takes to cross the vast expanse of space.
Agreed. The universe always existing was ALWAYS the only rational explanation given our current understanding of physics.
In spite of all the advances and strides we have made in understanding our Universe, it’s like just exploring one grain of sand partially. Honestly, the scope and scale of the Universe or Multiverse is beyond our comprehension and understanding with the current knowledge and tools we may never be able to figure it out. Big Bang is just another theory but not necessarily the truth as how the Universe as we know originated.
In time, I believe humans are capable of deciphering the deeper workings of the Universe. Sad to say that we may not have that time. We are too war like & destructive & most likely, we will destroy ourselves long before we evolve well enough to understand to Universe.
@@audience7264 Yeshua, the Son of Yahweh, will return to the earth soon and set up His glorious Kingdom. I know there are faithful disciples of the King of kings reading this comment. Speak up and encourage your brothers and sisters. Now is not the time to be silent. We need each other as the awaited day draws near.
You are a stranger😅
@jshonio6443
Jesus Christ the son of man said that which has the face of Caesar on it give it to Caesar that which has God's face on it give to God I never saw Yeshua for Yahweh are Yeezy claim to be to be the son of God nor the Jews or the ewe's and certainly not Netanyahuwoowoo,
And bidendoodoo 😂 to think that those fools call him something else is cuckoo, yea though we recognize and accept
Iesus Nephalim Reaganum Iudas
Died on the cross. ✝️
I only have 2 concerns. How and why? How did the initial element that incited the explosion come to be and why?
I remember when professor Brian Cox that the universe is 1400000000years old and he changed his mind all scientists must justify their obscene salaries
I love how he says Dark Matter and Dark Energy are leading explanations when we have no idea what either is...not much of an explanation.
Yeah. Like dude its ok to say you (we) dont know. Dark matter is just fancier sounding i guess 😂
I think he meant leading hypotheses
That's Brian for you.....
My bet is that the humans will not be around to see any of these speculations. We love our bombs too much.😢
If one could possibly travel to the end of all this, what would be there, nothing or something else? You could go crazy trying to figure all this out, it is just beyond comprehension.
I can understand this because often I have wondered how any thing can exist at all even a single atom. How can something appear from nothing? If only my bank balance could do that. :)
@@kinverrunner You haven't checked your bank account recently?... I magically created 4 million dollars there from nothing.... 🤨
@@panzerblitz2140 Thanks very much and just in time for Christmas too. I was hoping my luck would change😀
I read a paper about 20 years ago about how our observable universe, about 6 billion years ago, suddenly slowed down uniformly, everywhere. Then about a billion years or so later, sped up, everywhere at once and continues on its hyper speed. Whatever entity/agency is responsible for its creation is so far beyond our understanding we are left coping by vague anthropomorphism. Its a puzzle presented to any potential sentient species to navigate. We have to defeat our desire to kill each other over baubles first, which I don't think we can do. Still, its fantastic to simply try to comprehend the potentials it represents. Its really too much. I think its potential would lead us into how to escape it on truly long time lines, before entropy shuts it down.
It's interesting that the big crunch theory parallels what in the Veda's is called "The Breath of Brahma".
"Let there be light" and there was light. Bible
The universe may be vast, but not infinite. Infinity is an abstract mathematical concept with no confirmation in the physical world. If there are no infinitely small things (approaching zero), there cannot be infinitely large things, that is one divided by zero.
I am tempted to think of a fly sitting on a grain of sand in the desert, attempting to explain the World to another fly. (We have to assume a conversational ability here but, hey, it just a concept!) How about a tiny insect with a life span of 2 hours sitting on a mushroom? How do they perceive the world?
"I'm tempted to think of a fly......etc" .. ...what?
How about the fly with no stomache because it lives less than 24 hours, never gets hungry, it has all the energey it needs from birth... what?
Our senses are tuned by evolution to focus on human sized things and to ensure our survival in the world. For this reason we cannot use 'common sense' or intuition to learn about scales much larger than us or much smaller. Hence science uses experiments, evidence and mathematics to learn about the fundamentals of nature.
Are flies logical thinkers?
Apparently no one actually gets what you are saying. I get it.
To those discussing God in the role of creation, I would refer you Professor Cox who has said cosmology neither proves nor disproves God. We can have an opinion one way or the other, but to dismiss someone else’s belief without proof is as foolish as claiming that you know the correct answer to the origin of the universe - both views are unproven.
A finite universe and an infinite universe are inconceivable to me. A universe that always was and and a universe that had a beginning is inconceivable to me. I feel like an ant crawling on the earth, aware of the sun but no idea what it is.
In comparison to ants, we are even smaller in contrast to the whole universe. Just as an ant will never be able to see the entire planet on it's own, we will never know just how big the universe is, let alone how it began. To even try to figure it out is hubris
inconceivable to all of us. I do not think we are even anywhere near comprehending it.
Finite man cannot understand infinite space or for that matter an infinite Creator.
8:53 _"Nothing from our location could ever reach the edge nor could anything from the edge reach us"_
Replace 'reach' with 'observe' and you are right. Due to time dilation and length contraction it _is_ possible to travel to every place in the universe. Consider, that, at the speed of light every length (in the direction of movement) shrinks to zero. Yes we aren't massless and therefore won't be able to travel @ the speed of light, but if we one day travel _nearly_ at the speed of light, the distance to any target shrinks to _nearly_ zero.
NO
Such a beautifully mind boggling, fascinating subject.
@@piehoundyeah we spend so much $$$$ on space.
@@piehound Maybe when people presented this eternal beauty and its secrets it will distract them from doing petty things like starting a war, harming others. Wake up their internal explorers and childish curious minds. What do you think?
@@piehound Some people do horrible things just to left a mark in history books, a legacy, they'll realize that in the vastness of the Universe that's just petty peace of crap.
@@piehound It is petty when you project it to the entire Universe. Hell the entire history of humanity is nothing compared to the possible eternity of the Universe.
@@man.i.literally.failed6772you realize that NASA's budget is a tiny fraction of what the US spends in military spendings right? 33B vs nearly a trillion USD.
The caption at 1:22 is wrong, it reads:
_"13.2000 million light years away"_
It should read:
_"13.2 thousand million light years away"_
One aspect I don't understand about photons is that if a photon departs from a star, it never stops, because we see photons that departed one year ago, one million years ago or 13 billion years ago. Like if it had an infinite amount of "fuel" or kinetic energy.
Think of it as a constant copy of itself with just the information over to the next. A full blown copy would also copy the degradation or loss of "fuel" while the information copy is more like changing car to one that has a full tank and move on.
Photons do not exist until they interact with something. Prior to that, photons exist simply as probabilities. Probabilities propagate by rules of pure mathematics, not physical objects. No fuel or energy is expended to make them travel.
Light is God and God is light
Photon is not real.
The light wave dont travel to you. It propagates to you, much like sound.
There is no actual physical emission.
We have an innate intuition about physics, that serves us very well in day to day life. But it does not need to account for physics that only affects things that are much smaller or much larger, or move much faster than us. So we have the bias that things natural state is not moving. This bias was so strong that it took the greatest mind in human history of Newton, to postulate the near opposite. The natural state is that things keep a constant velocity unless acted on. So if something starts moving one has to figure out why it stopped moving not why it kept moving.
Isn't it just great how all these believers are so full of certainty without even the smallest bit of evidence for their gods and made bugger all progress in thousands of years, while scientists are full of questions, doubt and uncertainty, yet they've progressed farther in just a few decades than ever before throughout human history.
I think it's time for religions to come up with something groundbreaking because what they've got to show just isn't aging well.
Even with a space telescope, how is it possible to detect a photon over 40 billion lightyears away? I know space expanding and all that jazz, but how could a light photon make it it all the way to us to be detected when the amount of time that the universe itself has existed is less than half of the time that photon would take the photon to get here? 🤯
Because that photon wasn't 40 billion light years away when it was emitted.But since the time it was emitted, its been traveling "upstream" to get to us as the space itself is continuously expanding at an exponential rate the further out you look.
Therefore, for all we know, the real size of the universe could be millions of times bigger than we currently estimate.We know for sure there are definitely galaxies we will never see they were always too far away from us to ever get their photons here at light speed.The expansion rate is way way faster than light that far away and therefore they will never reach us.
The fact that nothing is there by the time you get there is the biggest lesson God could possibly give us. The answer is truly within.
@_BLACKSTAR_ light years is a scam. They always want to inflate the theory so they can always say "We don't know"
Imagine you have a piece of thin rubber 1 inch by 1 inch. You have a marker and are asked to draw a line from one end of the square to the other side. While you draw the line someone stretches the balloon by all four corners. Then you're asked how long your line is. Your line is now 24 inches long even though the square was 1 inch.
Same thing with the universe. It's been expanding since the start.
I'm beginning to realize the universe was this vast empty space (beyond our comprehension) that had several big bangs that occurred within it. Our big bang might be the most recent.
Every single solar system must be different imagine all the wonders that are out there.
The wonder is why the so-called experts ignore electricity. It's missing from all their equations. Plasma science = electricity, Stars are formed at pinch points along birkland currents, they know this, but admitting it, the so-called big bang theory evaporates.
There are trillions of galaxies, & each containing billions of stars. What are the chances of another solar system that is structured just like ours? Pretty good odds that there are multiple.
Like bigger inflation 😂
There is only one solar system. Our star is called Sol and the system is called the solor system. Who are you George Lucas?
@@audience7264 It depends on what you exactly mean by "just like ours". Similarities? Sure. Exactly the same? Highly unlikely.
That visualization of the Doppler effect was actually pretty good. I knew what it is but never visualized it that way. I always imagined the train example thats always used.
I'm pretty sure we're a very small part of something bigger. We're particles in a larger living being at their subatomic level
Truth!!
All these people lost in the comments scoffing at God. You'll soon be shown the truth. Without God you'll have to find out how something came from nothing and where that came from and where that came from, you'll always go through life with this as your curse wondering your purpose and your origin. God ALWAYS was ALWAYS will be. An INFINITE being with NO beginning or end. God is ETERNAL.
Anytime I want to remember how insignificant we are I just watch some space videos.
Space is actually way easier to explore than the ocean. When they find out how to do that then I'll be impressed. They are just throwing telescopes and measurement devices into the cosmos
@@ssjfroku You got any better ideas?
@JudePhilips no lol 😅 just not impressed by the space stuff anymore. I was really intrigued I mean like obsessed for the longest. Nothing ever comes out of it but more questions and anything we discover will always only be a picture. We arent reaching these places physically its impossible. So while they are throwing tons of money at space exploration we are on the brink of WWIII and America is in "debt" supposedly when I doubt that because we print money that has no physical backing, it's all fiat currency ay the end of the day. Just find it funny that these people ate supposed to be so smart but about what? Propulsion and different waves of lighting? Maybe some mapping among the gravitional fields so as to not hit anything? Which probably wouldn't happen if you just shot it out randomly cause it's so small compared to these vast distances between planets moon's and whatever else is out there it wouldn't hit em anyway. Idk just wish they would spend time and money on Earth not taking pictures of the universe.
Ah, but we are part of the cosmos, inseparable from it, at least physically which makes us very significant indeed.
If we truly are the only life then we are anything but insignificant.
This is like telling ants on an ant hill how big the Earth is.
I thought the term 'big bang' was coined sarcastically by someone who didn't like the theory, but it stuck.
Yes, so it was, to my knowledge. Inflation seems to be the new version of it. They don’t call it the ‘Big Pfffft’, yet, though.
This is true of many things. Invented insults that stick as names. Including Whigs and Tories in old England.
Was always called the Big Bang theory. Theory because it can change latter with more information
Yes you were right it was Fred Hoyle.
If you consider Conformal Cyclic Cosmology then there could have been an infinite number of big bangs in the past and will be in the future.
I can't help but think we might be missing something on the expansion of the universe. It appears to be expanding at the same rate in every direction we look, as if we are in the very center of the universe. I have not read, or seen any videos, that satisfactorily explain that, to my feeble mind, anyway. Also, nothing, in our relative vicinity, is moving away from us. As a matter of fact, we are told that the Andromeda galaxy and our Milky Way, are converging, and will collide in about 5 billion years.
Yeah, I've often wonder that too. Maybe the universe is soooo large it's messing with those calculations or our perceptions of distance objects.
space it self is expanding. ie the space between all the galaxy's is expanding. So say you were on a plant in a distance galaxy , from that prospective everything in every direction would still be expanding away from you.
It’ll be very challenging to find out since it really depends on your perspective relative to where you are in space. We just don’t have enough reference points.
@@leob3447My apologies. I replied to the wrong person. I will delete my first reply and send it to the correct person.
It has been detected recently that perhaps expansion is not uniform. Recent. Perhaps.
I prob heard it from Anton.
The concept that there is a startingpoint of time... I will probably never be able to wrap my mind around that.
TIME itself may yet be way more interesting than SPACE & what is to be found within it. If our UNIVERSE is the be all & end all then indeed TIME OCCURRED (of a sort) PROPERLY when our Universe showed up somehow? be it the BIG BANG or CREATED by someone? or some thing? but what if other Worlds / Universes / Realms existed before ours...then...can you imagine TIME beginning way before ours....WHAT HISTORY DOES THAT TIME HOLD...Wouldn't I like to know!
Until they can prove this stuff, I take it with a pinch of salt.
I see what you’re trying to say, but it’s the most explainable by way of findings/evidence so far than anything else. A LOT to learn still, but measurement of distance and light is probable math.
Like God?
Somewhere on earth, there is an Ant sitting on a rock...observing all that it knows. All that it knows can never embrace the true size of the planet, or the complexity of existence that exists all around it.
A Hiker sits on a rock and squishes the ant, looking up at the sky in wonder.
I have no doubt there is more than we will ever know....and if there is a truly alien life...communicating to us might be just as effective as trying to teach an Ant to speak French.
With cyclic cosmology, maybe Nietzsche was on the money with his concept of the 'Eternal Recurrence'.
Exactly….
I find this theory to be the one most suited to my brain... It at the very least answers for me what was there before the big bang... it was a big crunch... maybe the first... maybe the trillionth.. When we speak of time on that scale.. anything is possible...
orrr maybe the bible was right allll along. Forget Nietzsche, he's just a dumb human like the rest of us
The narrator talks with what can be assumed with great knowledge and experience. In actuality, the narrator is making guesses supported with speculations.
I can't express enough how grateful I am for your channel. Your videos have helped me understand complex scientific concepts in an easily digestible way
Great to hear!
@@thespacewind Space Wind, correction, Jesus Christ is the Creator of the universe who gets all the credit and our praise. Colossians chapter 1
I recall Conan Doyle through Holmes saying, "Watson, it makes no difference to me whether we go around the sun or the sun goes around the earth." Good point, do you not agree?
Time to read Dale Carnegie's book " Stop worrying & Start living ' !
The more they discover the more they move further away from knowing.
I think if mankind ever found out the Origin of the Universe, the enormity of that knowledge would bring about the end of Humanity.
Some things are better not to know.😮
Wait untill we find out what dark matter is.
The cosmic microwave background is just the programmer trying to run DOS so he can launch our simulation
Very interesting video and theories. Can't help thinking though that the computer simulation 'theory' is the most ridiculous concept of them all ! More strange is how this 'theory' ever got the 'legs' to ever be taken seriously!!
There was no big bang, it's only a theory. The so-called experts ignore electricity. It's missing from all their equations. Plasma science = electricity, Stars are formed at pinch points along birkland currents, they know this, but admitting it, the big bang theory evaporates.
They get paid to make stuff up. Then when they are proved wrong, they get paid to make more stuff up.
Ridiculous maybe, but could also the most probable. If we are ever able to create artificial intelligence and a virtual universe for it, what reason would we have to believe that we were the first civilization to do so? The likelihood that we too (or only you) are living inside a simulator becomes very high, close to certainty. It would not change your life in any way, however.
Any theory which talks about endless cycles, or the infinity of physical entities is not a scientific theory because there isn't any possibility of proving that infinity of anything exists.
Incredible. I can't imagine how many trips to the chemist it would take to get to the edge of the universe.
infinite times zero
@@ruperttakacs4353 Is that less or more than 42?
Pictures showing so many galaxy does not mean they are all still existing actually, the light is a proof that it used to exist long time ago depending of distance but it is not a proof that it still exist now.
Only God could do this. - the Universe 😊
Lazy thinking.
The universe is infinite in size, the big bang was billion of times more than we think and the universe has multiple "big bangs"
how about the universe always existed. you come and go and you think everything else does. you cannot accept that you know nothing.
I can....i know what i know and everything interest me....and if everything turns out to be diferent no problem either😊
you will never figure it out because there is no such things as time and distance.
The more theoretical physicist and astronomers find out, the more everything changes and goes back to not knowing anything.
@@summergivens242that's not quite true. The more we discover the more questions emerge. It's not like we go back to not knowing anything.
@@shaunneal9981 You have a point. Just wrong about some thing's they were pretty sure were factual.
I have never understood why people insist on equating the Big Bang with the origin of the universe, when all we can say is that it began to expand at the BB. Two completely different things.
We know from Noether's Theorem combined with Energy Conservation that time is symmetrical, ie there is no special point in time, so no beginning and no end. So the best bet seems to me to be a universe that has no beginning or end either in time or space, with flat Euclidean geometry (with dimples). The advantage of this is that it is very simple, with no need to explain how it started because it didn't.
I’m going with God created it all….
Well good for you! =)
And how did God come to be?
I’m kind of going with God as well. Who knows how God can be defined. Probably not anything close to a Judeocristianismo God.
You are creating a bigger problem because science is about discovery and research now you must explain this god
You are going to have to be specific which one of the thousand gods made it.
Sage Vasishta tells this to lord Rama." Hai Ram the secret of the origin of the universe will remain an unresolved mystery for mankind.. Because the universe is not physically real ".
The universe is Infinite and there's nobody that can put an age on it.
It was here a long time before anything.
All these uncountable worlds and im stuck in this one where people celebrate murderous terrorist attacks.
If the universe existed before the big bang, but the big bang has been disproved so it never happened, then we are left with the universe existed.....period.
I'll never understand why all these deep dives leave out a possibility that strikes me as obvious. Our lack of understanding may not simply reflect a lack of empirical evidence. We may simply lack the capacity to understand regardless of the state of the evidence.
At 20.03, before and after, that is, the Oscillating Universe speculation (not theory, because there is, so far, no way to test it) is what I've always considered the most likely nature of our Universe. Expansion, followed by a cusp stage, and then contraction, followed by another cusp phase, and expansion again. No "creation" moment, it's just always existed in one form or another. This of course doesn't change the fact that the existence of the Universe is a great mystery and will forever enthrall intelligent beings such as ourselves, and probably others, in the Cosmos.
Pls educate me, why are we mixing the multi universe concept to the question if the universe infinite? An infinite universe does not automatically means multi universe is true, right?
We all know that now without the need for scientists to tell us. Roger Penrose has been saying that long before Brian Cox. What we need to hear is the admission by scientists that it is not possible anymore to theorize about the "absolute" beginning, that there is no such thing.
Unless infinity is something other than infinite, there's no such thing as a limited universe, in space, time, or anything else. But if our universe is limited, there has to be an infinite number of other universes, with infinite variety. The human mind can scarcely conceive infinity, but nothing makes sense without it.
Infinity isn't a "thing" it's an idea and more importantly a vector.
The way we commonly use language, anything can be a thing, including ideas.
Infinity is a concept, but with the minds we humans possess, I think it's the only concept of the totality of existence that makes sense. If the totality of existence is different than what we think of as infinity, then so be it. But we only have the minds we have to figure things out, so that's what we use, and why necessarily assume we don't understand what to us seems to make sense?
Is my point. But I'm not sure you're saying anything different.
@@jd9119
I just don't believe there's no external infinite space already. How can there be a place *without* a *space* at all? How do you even *imagine* such a "void"? It's easer to imagine an infinite space that was there already forever.
The only thing that I find comparable with this expanding universe is the inflation in our economy.
As far as I know, there are galaxies that are closing one to another, so... no all the galaxy are going a way one from another.
It was pointed out 2500 years ago in buddhism , but most western world did not have interest to study it.
In British English, an American billion is called 1000 million. In British English a billion = one million x one million so in American English would be a trillion = 1000 billion. This is serious mismatch between British and American English in astronomy and soon shopping at the supermarket.
In other words - there was no beginning and therefore there is no end either - the universe is born and expands then contracts and dies and is then re-born again with another "big-bang" and so it continues like this for ever more.
Total guesswork. The unknown unknowns remain massive
The pastry bag is just a great fun way to think of things.
follow any particle backwards in time and you will find a 'big' bang
(infinite acceleration eliminates time --> time is inertia )
The universe isn't expanding. It is at least 93 billion light years away. We have no way of testing the accuracy of the Doplar effect on light which has traveled billions of light-years through space and time.
obviously your atoms are not moving away from each other, but if all space is expanding then is it safe to say your atoms are moving towards each other at the same speed as the space is expanding?
The Bing Bang theory is true. As soon as this universe ends, a new one will become instantly
5:54 "A galaxy called GN-Z11, or GN-Z11". It's nice to have both options.
Just a correction: 0 times infinity is clearly 0 and nothing else. Because the multiplication operator means that you add the left number that many times as is written on the right. 0 times 2 = 0 + 0 = 0. 0 times 3 = 0 + 0 + 0 = 0. 0 times infinity = 0 + 0 + 0 ...... = still 0.
Can dark matter slow down light to give us a false reading of distance of the red shift ?
I am just a tradey from OZ asking a simple question !
Time to change terminology! The Universe is not the stars that we see, it is the container of the stars that we see. In my own uneducated and humble opinion, the Universe is eternal and infinite. If I were to elaborate on this thought, I'd say that the universe is in a constant routine of exchanging the states of energy and matter. Infinite and eternal... how many times in how many millennia or billlenia has there been a different collection of stars and planets with entirely different beings? And how many have disappeared? Or merely exist beyond our sight.
Is it me, or was anyone else waiting for Edge's guitar coming in?? ;-)
20:30 Big Crunch : a theory similar to a throwing boomerang. which if the boomerang take no or less casualties, it eventually circles back to it's original cast / source of kickstart
Big Slurp : On the other hand, resemble a curtain or a globe of hemisphere or somewhat Atmospheric Curtain to fade like a Depleting Giant rugby ball running out of Air Energy and Gradually fading away like a curtain suddenly losing it's gravitational bone structure or somewhat like a skyscraper, when you suddenly make metal beam ( acting as gravity bone ) to vanished, you will get a crumbling down curtain sort of in effects
We really don't know how many of the stars we see are still there. We see them as they were millions and billions of years ago. They may have burned out long ago.
The universe isn't just bigger than you think, it's bigger than you CAN think.
I thought the James Webb telescope confirmed what was first seen with the Hubble telescope that disproves universe expansion. You know distant galaxies would appear larger due to the expansion of space. However observed distant galaxies don't appear larger.
and this is why i belive without a doubt that we are not the only intelligent self aware life out there. it would be ignorant and absurd for us to think otherwise.
what is it that we call the universe ?
the problem with the conception of infinity is that, we could debate on it indefinitely .
we will probably never be able see the "limit" of the universe because we will always find something behind what we see .
if there's only a huge void then what's beyond that void ?
If it takes 13 billion years for light to travel that distance than how can we measure it?
I hope soon we are in contact with an intelligent alien race that has some answers for us.
lol. That might be like trying to explain astrophysics to a dog. Anyone we meet is likely to be that far or more ahead of us.
@@JungleDjinn lol, yeah I agree with you there.
Conformal cyclic cosmology is not what this video says it is. It has nothing to do with black hole cosmology, a Big Crunch or a torus shaped universe which was on screen for some reason.
Just ask the cameraman, he documented it all
If you look very good he’s still there
God will tell me the answers hopefully when im dead.
the bing bang was probably what created the milky way, but outside that... it didnt create the "universe"
Why is he calling 100 billion a hundred thousand million? Later he said 15 billion, so why isn’t that 15 thousand million?
That was driving me crazy!
The universe is gone. You just don’t know it yet. The key word is “observable universe”. It’s all gone.
So, the universe is expanding faster than the speed of light. Meaning even if it isn't infinite, we ain't ever going to catch up to the edge.
*WHY having such annoying repetitive music spoiling such a fascinating topic! Is there a version WITHOUT IT?! I would love to listen to this again but can't bear with that damn track behind!*
Did it really exist before the big bang or can they just see objects on the opposite side of the origin?
When we "Peter out," we just simply enter another life form (automatically). Life takes many shapes, sizes, colors, and intelligence. The cycle of life is infinity. It's energy. 👽
ไม่มีอะไรเปลี่ยนแปลง ใจมนุษย์ อย่างผมได้ หลักธรรม ที่ต้องดำเนินต่อไปกับโลกมนุษย์ ที่จะมีชีวิต สืบสาน อารยธรรมของมนุษย์ ที่ดำรงใว้ หลักพระพุทธศาสนาในโลกนี้ ที่มีอารยธรรม5000ปี ที่กำหนดและ ย่นย่อเวลาเข้ามาอย่างรวดเร็ว และระงับยับยั้งได้ ในการกระทำของสัตว์และคน ที่ยังไม่มีความเป็น คนณธรรม ในโลกมนุษย์ แค่นี้เอง แล้วจะยึดหลักศาสนาใด มาอุ้มชู
Infinity is smallness, how many times can you cut a piece of paper , theoretically it cannot be cut down to oneness, its more eternal than the universe
You can't make something out of nothing, so the nothing must have been something.