2 Secrets to Beating the Market. Great Value Investor Joel Greenblatt Explains

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 1 มิ.ย. 2024
  • Great value investor Joel Greenblatt reveals his two secrets to investment success. He is living proof that active management can still work really well. Greenblatt is Managing Principal and Co-Chief Investment Officer of Gotham Asset Management where he co-manages hedge funds and several hedge fund-like mutual funds utilizing long/short strategies. His behavioral insight that the best investment strategy is one that both makes sense and that you can stick with.
    The proposition that active management still works can be made on a case by case basis in the highly competitive stock mutual fund business, but it doesn’t hold up in general. In Greenblatt’s opinion: the investment flows to passive will continue, but there is a silver lining to this trend, which he will explain.
    In an exclusive interview, great value investor Joel Greenblatt reveals his two secrets to investment success. WEALTHTRACK #1542 broadcast on April 05, 2019.
    More at: www.wealthtrack.com

ความคิดเห็น • 45

  • @mikhaillindan9091
    @mikhaillindan9091 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    " If you are focused on 3-4 years from now you are alone"- Pure Gold

    • @cryptogoth
      @cryptogoth ปีที่แล้ว

      He used to say "if you do good valuation work, it may take 2-3 years for the market to agree with you."

    • @jimjackson4256
      @jimjackson4256 ปีที่แล้ว

      That is right but who can see out 3 or 4 years or even 1 year?

  • @hheythered
    @hheythered 4 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Joel is so easy to understand. I would love to take his class.

  • @john-tr8jy
    @john-tr8jy 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    this channel is gold...subscribed!

  • @user-wz8ol2dp9o
    @user-wz8ol2dp9o 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    any subtitles? other videos include subtitles but this one doesn't...

  • @christopherdennis4280
    @christopherdennis4280 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    By far the fastest talking guest you've ever had.

  • @akashcast
    @akashcast 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    20:47 onwards is the best part !

  • @jimjackson4256
    @jimjackson4256 5 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    Why not put a date on these interviews ?

    • @stchew49
      @stchew49 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Jim Jackson - Fully agreed! For me, undated interviews have no relevance and should be distrusted from the word 'Go!'

    • @leeklinglesmith3427
      @leeklinglesmith3427 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      WEALTHTRACK #1542 broadcast on April 05, 2019.

    • @jimjackson4256
      @jimjackson4256 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@leeklinglesmith3427 Thank you

  • @cryptogoth
    @cryptogoth ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Great interview questions, and as always Joel is entertaining and insightful.

  • @bgates275
    @bgates275 5 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    Speaking of behavioral finance, does anyone else find it humorous that a credit rating firm, with the name Moody's, exists? I sure hope their analytics arn't based on emotion.

  • @darkhumphrey
    @darkhumphrey 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    4:10. This guy has sense of humor

  • @Demonicranga
    @Demonicranga 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    awesome

  • @somchai9033
    @somchai9033 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    8:00 talks about Houston Astros. Author was tipped off on high -tech cheating scheme.

  • @praneethchathuranga5876
    @praneethchathuranga5876 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I read that big secret book with in 4 hours

  • @stephena5752
    @stephena5752 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I feel like the new value investing is actually being able to create discounted cash flow models for high growth companies better than most

  • @ericguo8209
    @ericguo8209 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Is he just a Buffett proxy?

    • @Erikpdx
      @Erikpdx 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      He's more active in his trading, and shorts overpriced stocks. Although they both look at stocks from a value evaluation perspective

    • @cryptogoth
      @cryptogoth ปีที่แล้ว

      Greenblatt has had success with formulaic / algorithmic passive investing, like inverting the S&P500 weighting by market cap, or combining index with long bets for undervalued stocks and short bets for overvalued stocks, according to their proprietary intrinsic value calculation. He also does special situations (mergers, splits, etc.) You can do worse than just copying Buffett (like Pabrai), but you have to read 50 years of annual letters to even figure out what copying would mean. Mostly it's buying wonderful businesses at a discount, buying whole businesses, occasional arbitrage, and generating float cheaply (from insurance premiums) to reinvest.

  • @y.r.9401
    @y.r.9401 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Where can I put my money and let it grow at 18% or even at 4% now!

    • @hheythered
      @hheythered 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      NYMT has a 13% a year dividend yield.

    • @cryptogoth
      @cryptogoth ปีที่แล้ว

      If you do a discounted cashflow calculation for good growing businesses, you can still find some at 20% discount to their intrinsic value. It may take 2-5 years for market to agree with you. Oaktree preferreds give 6.5% dividend until maturity.

  • @Partytime60
    @Partytime60 ปีที่แล้ว

    I gave the 999th like to is video.... What about u???

  • @yomynameismit
    @yomynameismit 5 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    expense ratio > 3% ??? Goodbye!

    • @wisemanstudio
      @wisemanstudio 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Wait ... he charges 3%. lol.

    • @CaspersCuts
      @CaspersCuts 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      No, watch 22:00 he addresses that. It's really 1.15%.

    • @yomynameismit
      @yomynameismit 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@CaspersCuts read the actual prospectus.. its north of 3%

    • @CaspersCuts
      @CaspersCuts 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@yomynameismit Did you watch the explanation for that at 22:00? 3% includes dividends paid on his short book but is not offset by the dividends on his levered long book (which makes no sense given the fund runs 280% gross, with about 190% long and 90% short).

    • @somchai9033
      @somchai9033 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      You clearly didn’t listen

  • @vivekkumarsingh1309
    @vivekkumarsingh1309 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    My life has totally changed since I started an investment of $60,000 and now earning over $57,000.

    • @vivekkumarsingh1309
      @vivekkumarsingh1309 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      To be financially free with a passive income source which exceeds your expenses, you need to invest . It's not just watching videos and reading investment books anymore but for positive results, work with an expert. I use to think I can make more money investing on my own without any loss, but I had better luck working with a financial advisor I'm glad I chose to work with Wilson dric and I have no regrets with my decision

  • @amatuer2
    @amatuer2 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Just buy the S&P ... the rest is just smoke and mirrors .

    • @Erikpdx
      @Erikpdx 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      That's easier to say when it's going up

    • @amatuer2
      @amatuer2 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Erik F overtime it always goes up

    • @Erikpdx
      @Erikpdx 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@amatuer2 not between 2000-2013... There was no gain

    • @cryptogoth
      @cryptogoth ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Erikpdx Nice catch, if you invested all at the beginning, you're right. Most people dollar cost average over time into Sp500 so they still had a positive gain during the bear years. if you want to ride with the GOAT tho, BRK.B had a better gain from 2000-2013.

    • @vivekkumarsingh1309
      @vivekkumarsingh1309 ปีที่แล้ว

      To be financially free with a passive income source which exceeds your expenses, you need to invest . It's not just watching videos and reading investment books anymore but for positive results, work with an expert. I use to think I can make more money investing on my own without any loss, but I had better luck working with a financial advisor I'm glad I chose to work with Wilson dric and I have no regrets with my decision