VGSI Not Coincident | VASI Glidepath vs RNAV and ILS Glidepath

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 7 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 21

  • @thomasmennella5501
    @thomasmennella5501 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    How is each video better than the last when they’re all perfect?! Truly an incredible educator.

  • @fikipilot
    @fikipilot ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You know, that was one idiosyncratic points of the instrument flying environment that I totally forgot about. Good work sir!

  • @Saml01
    @Saml01 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I would not switch to the VASI guidance if I'm already stable on the rnav. That means power and pitch changes and a steeper angle of descent versus the rnav. The rnav provides the obstacle clearance just the same.

    • @codydowney9494
      @codydowney9494 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Because it won’t keep you safe below MDA, that’s why there’s a such a thing as VDP. Below MDA, you transition to the visual glide path indication.

  • @gonetoearth2588
    @gonetoearth2588 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Excellent video...best visual explanation I have seen of this concept!

  • @jdl2327
    @jdl2327 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Something I don't understand is that the VGSI glideslope and TCH had the same values as the approach glideslope and TCH, yet it was NOTAM'd not coincident. I don't understand?

  • @PedroPatsf
    @PedroPatsf ปีที่แล้ว

    My problem is a lot of the VASI's seemed to be designed for a 172. In a corporate jet at a lot of airports, if you stay right on the VASI you'll land halfway down the runway making stopping difficult.

  • @FinkelBlog
    @FinkelBlog ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Since the RNAV glidepath will keep you safe, why switch to the VASI glidepath?

    • @codydowney9494
      @codydowney9494 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Because it won’t keep you safe below MDA, that’s why there’s a such a thing as VDP. Below MDA, you transition to the visual glide path indication.

  • @vfx7t
    @vfx7t ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you from Algeria !

  • @Bushpilot.
    @Bushpilot. ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you now all makes sense

  • @philipwidner
    @philipwidner ปีที่แล้ว

    Awesome stuff as always, thank you

  • @jakew9887
    @jakew9887 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great presentation. Thanks

  • @MrSuzuki1187
    @MrSuzuki1187 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Well said!

  • @IanHorsford
    @IanHorsford ปีที่แล้ว

    That was brilliant 👏🏾👏🏾

  • @kevindt100
    @kevindt100 ปีที่แล้ว

    Always fallowed your videos for flight simmulator. I always thought this was due to the sim. Thanks for explaining.

  • @kenengland7632
    @kenengland7632 ปีที่แล้ว

    Really useful, thanks

  • @aviatortrucker6285
    @aviatortrucker6285 ปีที่แล้ว

    I heard that part 135 requires VASI to be used always but not under part 91. Just like circling is not authorized under parts other than 91. Which is true?

  • @AM.Boxing
    @AM.Boxing ปีที่แล้ว

    Love

  • @scottfranco1962
    @scottfranco1962 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Doesn't really answer the fundamental question: Why are the visual and rnav glideslopes different?

    • @jakew9887
      @jakew9887 ปีที่แล้ว

      Good question. I would have thought that the RNAV could have been designed to match the VASI path.