Uniform Civil Code: What Constitution Put Forward?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 1 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 34

  • @AmanKumar-pe4zx
    @AmanKumar-pe4zx หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Imagine J.Sai Deepak sitting in this panel 🎆🧨🔥🚒

    • @ramji_ki_katha
      @ramji_ki_katha หลายเดือนก่อน

      The owner of LiveLaw is Hardcore Communist from Kerela. They will never allow any deviation from their Communist Stand.

  • @bibhashkumarnandi83
    @bibhashkumarnandi83 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Me Sibal bring J Sai Deepak, and see, how the tables turn.

  • @shashkantchadha3088
    @shashkantchadha3088 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    *THANK YOU, ALL THE PANELISTS FOR THIS INTELLIGENT & STIMULATING DEBATE ON UNIFORM CIVIL LAW~THE INTERACTION BETWEEN THE PANELLISTS PARTIALLY CLEARS THE AIR ON THE CONTROVERSIAL SUBJECT*

  • @vincentpinto1127
    @vincentpinto1127 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Kapil makes an excellent point ending at about 24:00. Sadly the others remained clueless to addressing it.

  • @momikshyaarunaozah344
    @momikshyaarunaozah344 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    "UCC" WILL DEFINITELY KEEP IN BALANCE the FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS, DIRECTIVE PRINCIPLES OF STATE POLICY, AND THE FUNDAMENTAL DUTIES THAT PRESCRIBE FUNDAMENTAL OBLIGATIONS OF THE STATES TO ITS CITIZENS AND hopefully ACCEPTABLE UNIVERSALLY AND MORE PARTICULARLY IT GIVES JUSTICE TO ALL BY ELIMINATING DISCRIMINATORY PRACTICES AND SIMPLIFY THE LEGAL SYSTEM

  • @gauravagarwal7870
    @gauravagarwal7870 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Kya humara legal system world ka best legal System ban sakta h ??
    Our Constitution best Constitution h agree
    Legal System?? Best h ??
    Tarik par Tarik
    78 year of Independence
    ISRO progress
    DRDO
    Etc etc

  • @PP-zr3ih
    @PP-zr3ih หลายเดือนก่อน

    Why the illegitimate child is not treated as coparcener in HUF property..?
    Why the child is not treated as equal?

  • @deepakkumr
    @deepakkumr 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Gov should make laws barring court fixers to practice law. they are only arguing cases against integrity of India creating anarchy. China also punishes lawyers delaying confusing courts.

  • @PP-zr3ih
    @PP-zr3ih หลายเดือนก่อน

    India must need ucc

  • @gauravagarwal7870
    @gauravagarwal7870 หลายเดือนก่อน

    How , Rickshaw Pullers can get Justice in India

  • @deepakkumr
    @deepakkumr 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Modi should bring separate Criminal laws for Hindus. There should be no need for police courts lawyers. Criminal should be punished on street. Instant Justice. Fees of lawyers should be regulated. Just one paisa per case.

    • @fnc303
      @fnc303 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Bro what is your age and what do you do?

  • @ramji_ki_katha
    @ramji_ki_katha หลายเดือนก่อน

    What version of Sharia Law Saudi Arabia is following where they don't allow reading Namaz on roads and if done it is punishable but in India someone is stopped it becomes an international human rights issue. In Iran a Muslim Women if she is not wearing is Hijab anyone can complain and get her punished under Sharia, why not this Sharia be allowed in India?
    Bas 4 shaadi karne ke liye Sharia chahiye? Aur Maintenance pe ek Judgement aajaye Supreme Court ka toh baap baap karne lagte hain. Ye double standard bas India mein hain.

  • @SuryanarayanaJagarlapudi
    @SuryanarayanaJagarlapudi 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I go with Smt Minakshi Lekhi and I think that Mr Kapil Sibal is doing politics .

  • @biswajitdehury7626
    @biswajitdehury7626 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Kapil sibal Gerorge Sorors Agent

  • @himanshurajpurohit3272
    @himanshurajpurohit3272 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Don't know of govt of India's intentions.... But m sure sibal sahab wants to countries growth to be stunted at any cost..... In Whole discussion sibal wanted to asset his point of GoI intentions but he never mentions any reform for country but only want to stop any discussion

    • @vineetchaturvedi9793
      @vineetchaturvedi9793 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Growth is not connected to personal laws of minority groups which constitute barely 20% of India's population. Personal laws can be different for each community, but they must be just in law. Disparity of personal laws in 50 states of USA did not come in the way of it's rise as the greatest power.
      Prof Faisan explains this very well, and the other panelists seem to agree entirely with him. This cardinal point needs to be understood.

    • @ramji_ki_katha
      @ramji_ki_katha หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@vineetchaturvedi9793 What version of Sharia Law Saudi Arabia is following where they don't allow reading Namaz on roads and if done it is punishable but in India someone is stopped it becomes an international human rights issue. In Iran a Muslim Women if she is not wearing is Hijab anyone can complain and get her punished under Sharia, why not this Sharia be allowed in India?
      Bas 4 shaadi karne ke liye Sharia chahiye? Aur Maintenance pe ek Judgement aajaye Supreme Court ka toh baap baap karne lagte hain. Ye double standard bas India mein hain.

  • @lourencodafatimasouza1479
    @lourencodafatimasouza1479 20 วันที่ผ่านมา

    In Goa Hindus can have a second marriage if the wife cannot give birth within certain number of years.

  • @RajendraPrasad-qq2oh
    @RajendraPrasad-qq2oh 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Well if the country is at the threshold of progress,visit not the time to also sort out inequalities and move forward? There are pressing issues and while they are attended to why not sort out this inequality? The reason for the present demand for UCC is the appeasement politics of congress. It will be political and part of legislation and political parties representing people need to work for people's aspirations. Nothing wrong!

  • @mintusaren895
    @mintusaren895 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Missing words may please be relieved. It constitional. Preamble.

  • @hemantsahu9642
    @hemantsahu9642 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Everybody perspective is just one sided and lacks the diverse possible opinions.

  • @PriyankaShah-2000
    @PriyankaShah-2000 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Give shorts and small video of each person interviewed

  • @nilanjanamukherjee7664
    @nilanjanamukherjee7664 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    He is politically biased, for this reason he should be removed from judiciary system
    Persons related to justice shouldn't be biased or prejudiced

  • @nandlalsingh644
    @nandlalsingh644 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Why Muslims of India are against UCC?

  • @sadhanarajput4018
    @sadhanarajput4018 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Is conversation ko hindi main bhi upload kre please

  • @deepakrajopadhye7107
    @deepakrajopadhye7107 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Why thos fellow ? Obstructionist at all counts ! This shows your biased approach ! Any indian citi having common sense, will not object to UCC ! You are de grading your channel !

  • @srinivasrao2944
    @srinivasrao2944 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Kapil sab you are biased and not a patriot