The only way to get starmer out is to get on the streets and protest peacefully and there is a 22 billion pounds blackhole just look at the bank of England income statement which shows a unrealized loss on the guilts portfolio fact starmer should have been thrown out after the stupidity in September in particular the UK is bancrupt
Quelle surprise. I mean why the hell did anyone vote for Starmer's Labour? And don't say to get rid of the Tories, because the only difference was in the colour of the rosettes.
@@mdhightide1860 Actually Starmer achieved far worse election results than Labour did under Corbyn in absolute terms of votes or even percentage terms, but thanks to the self-destructing Tory collapse, the corporate media rallying to his Blairite cause, and the bizarre vagaries of our nonsensical FPTP system he still got a big majority. To do what? Precisely what the Tories were doing anyway. Get over it yourself.
I said that bk in April and may of last year and I said then and I'm going to say it again the UK is bancrupt the debt we have crossed the rubicon it can't be paid back energy prices haven't gone up its the pound that's gone down we only have 1 percent of purchasing power left in the UK pound and they are going to take that last 1 percent this guy has no idea how things work
Many people I know said to get rid of the Tories. I said there is no difference between the parties. Plus it's all a sham we don't live in a democracy but a shamocrasy. The British political elite decided Starmer was the new globalist neo liberal pro genocide Zionist and warmonger they wanted.
@DarrenSmith-tq2xz Checking the £ to $ rate, it seems it's the same now as it was in 2016, so it's curious you think the recent rise in energy rates in the last couple of years is a result of a £ that's as strong now as it was a decade. I guess the energy companies were just 8 years late in their adjustments? As for the debt, lol. I would really love to know who you debt watchers think the debt is owed to. Because it seems to me that if the UK can't pay back its debt, then it's the people who are owed the debt who have a problem. As for how bad the debt actually is, in 2020 the national debt was 81% of GDP. In 1919 it was 135% of GDP. In 1923 it was 181% of GDP. In 1947 after WW2 it was 238% of GDP. I'm no history boff, but if we didn't go bankrupt then, I struggle to see why you think we're suddenly going to go bankrupt now. But then you're clearly the expert here so who am I to question you, random TH-cam poster, when facts exist.
For the first time since I was 18 I could not vote Labour because of Starmer and his lack of information for what he was going to do if he won the Election he just kept quite lots of us noticed this so I voted Green always good to hear from Prem and he is right Thanks Crispin
@@charliebrandt2263 We have to hit rock bottom as a nation before the majority wake up to who is really on their side. I'm optimistic but God only knows what the timeline is.
A poor decision, given the Green Party's record of attacking trade unionists in the only council they have held power - Brighton & Hove. Also, the Green Party are now pro-war since deciding to become full-on supporters of NATO.
The alternative was George Galloways Workers Party, but a lot who would have voted for them voted for reform instead and thanks to 'raeli meddling the party won no seats in parliament.
@@AlanWarrenBelfastArchitect A vote for the Green Party would not be "pressure from the left" given their track record of attacking workers when controlling Brighton & Hove Council. Most of the left departed the Green Party (myself included) between 2012 and 2014 when the Greens were attacking low-paid council employees, causing three years of on-off strikes. The Green Party have shifted even further to the right since then since abandoning their anti-war position and becoming full-on supporters of NATO, and cheerleaders of the Nazi regime in Ukraine.
I would rate Starmer's performance as excellent -this is what he has delivered: New Scotland poll points to big pro-independence majority in 2026 - and an SNP landslide in the next UK general election.
Thank you Crispin, you are saving the day on the left every time, and Prem too. Meanwhile Novara Media claim Reeves' budget was unfairly criticized, and give a fawning interview to a dinosaur of Neo liberal economic mythology. Ruchir Sharma is allowed to spout discredited "balanced budget" nonsense unchallenged, and promote a proto-austerity mindset which if taken to its logical conclusion would be the end of Britain as a modern country. Bastani (I'm smart cuz I read the Guardian and the FT too), the compatible left-presenting-liberal interviewer nods along in agreement.
There is zero possibility of us building 1.5 million houses. Where are we going to build them that has the services in place? Sewerage treatment, water supplies, electricity, schools and hospitals, feeder roads etc. Not enough skilled labour. The land needs to be purchased, schemes designed and planning permission obtained. That is only the start of the process. Other approvals are required, work tendered and houses constructed. If you started today, you would be lucky to be selling the first houses 2 years from now. One of the priorities that this country needs to do is invest in the cheapest forms of energy production and storage. It is currently on shore wind, followed by hydro. If we have lower energy bills we may find that our competitiveness in some industries improves, brick making, steel and cement production. Would also help reduce everyone's energy bills.
I don't see any way we can get a proper Labour government this year, or anything like one, unless the vast majority of the present Labour mps were somehow, tragically, to get wiped out, a General election were to be called, and Jeremy Corbyn and his independent colleagues were to form an alliance with those actual socialists that were all that remained of the Labour party, together with George Galloway's WS party, with people of the calibre of Craig Murray being elected, and they were prepared to form an alliance with the Greens, the SNP, Plaid Cwmru & maybe even the Lib. Dem.s - on the basis that any government formed would change the voting system, would devolve powers to the regions more, and would actually behave like a left of centre Government. Also on my wish list, that won't occur of course, would be things like the arraignment of Boris Johnson and others on grounds of mendaciousness, questionable probity (or even corruption) and poor judgement (Lis Truss is one of many who spring to mind in the last regard, there being many others who I could name, but won't - some of which might be controversial choices for some - on the basis of their bad governance, and their colluding with and justifying of war-mongering and genocide). This, I fear, is the stuff of dreams, but it's a lot better, imo, than the nightmare of either more of the same, or, Gawd forbid, an alliance between Tories and Reform to misgovern us.
Your idea is the one I agree with. Maybe the independent's should just be the focus as that way local people are more likely to get a good representative finally. Party politics seems to be quite restrictive in some respects as many people don't like George Galloway.
@@Pomegranate_David I have my misgivings about some of GG's pronouncements and attitudes as well, but I think you may be missing my point. The left is very good at being argumentative with itself, in-fighting and nit picking over small, or maybe not quite so small differences. What's required, if anything is going to change, is to set aside differences and for the left to work together, but eliminate those elements, which / who are plainly traitorous infiltrat-ions/-ors. That doesn't mean that only "Working Class" people should be included - Tony Benn would have been excluded on that basis, but people who call themselves socialists who, at best, could be called champagne socialists, and people who, like Starmer, would be unable to sign up to a basic leftist agenda, or who are just entryist careerists, such as Blair, Campbell or Mandelson, should not be welcomed. On the other hand, the idea that good candidates were being deselected by H.O. / Starmer is anathema, and should, imo, tell us all that there is something badly wrong with a party that has been taken over by the right of the PLP!, which has become, itself, further right than is good for democratic balance, and has, imo, lost the party the right to call itself by the name it suborns by its' policies. Furthermore, I have an idea that, should the swp stand in those northern seats it lost to Labour next time round, they (including Craig Murray, were he to stand in Blackburn again) would stand a far better chance of winning. But arguing over the things that would stop a coalition of progressives is counter-productive and would only lead to the possible success of a more far right coalition, were that to take shape.
@@robertdavidson8028 I like George myself but I'm just considering that he is marmite on certain issues to the left. I agree people should set aside their differences for the greater good but I feel despair in all honesty as I see no unity. But maybe if driven to a even more right wing direction by the Farage supporters and everyone finally seeing him for the charlatan he is we might get a real alternative emerge. We need the disgruntled right to come over to our side too.
This is why the left never wins. Boris Johnson actually adopted some of Corbyn's policies and made a genuine attempt to improve things. You should have supported him to keep Starmer out, yet you fall for the nonsense and play personality politics.
The only game in town in the UK is asset price inflation for the benefit of the elite . . . . ratio of UK external debt is 2.75 times GDP, (Consumption depressed). . . USA external debt to GDP is 0.95. . . .tells you all you need to know about the intended direction of travel of the economy.
Keir Starmer and the Labour Party wanted to remain in the European Union, complete with its right-wing, neo-liberal economic policies and austerity programme, so not sure why anyone is surprised by what Labour is doing in government.
Why do you do these surveys with the people that subscribe to you.. That's akin to saying. I asked 100 people with the same opinion as me and 99 agreed. How is that representative of the population at all? Also quite curious.. You seem to suggest starmer is no good, but the public will go to the right in the next election, if that's the case how doesnt that suggest starmer isn't "right enough" for the public? They'd lurch to the left wouldn't they, if he wasn't left enough? What's your view on this?
Still in La La land mate, Starmer is an establishment plant always has been always will be even someone with your room temperature IQ isn't going to be able to deny that soon enough.
Why not look at this ge petition so far it has reaached 3016401 and still going up we need to show that the public are not behind them and that wr have no confidence in their government.Angela Raynor was a cleaner in a care home at 15 yrs as she waas pregnant and kicked out by her father but she did study for an nvq to become a care worker.
@angelafirst38 sure.. But at least say that as your evidence in your videos then. Not I asked a group of people who agree with me if they agree with me.
Blimey Crispin, Interesting sampling technique...clearly statistical sampling analysis was not high on your GCSE achievements... You couldn't have achieved a more biased sample if you'd thrown a questionnaire into a Jeremy Corbyn Memorial Fund Raising event...
I explain it’s mostly people on the left but many of my subscribers are still in Labour or voted Labour. There won’t be any Tories so from that perspective, it’s not looking good for Starmer.
Prem Sikka is spot on, a depressing catalogue of avoidable misery from this horrible government.
The only way to get starmer out is to get on the streets and protest peacefully and there is a 22 billion pounds blackhole just look at the bank of England income statement which shows a unrealized loss on the guilts portfolio fact starmer should have been thrown out after the stupidity in September in particular the UK is bancrupt
Be careful criticising this government you'll be accused of being far right.
Wonderful Prem Sikka - nailed. He's right. We're being run into the gutter. As Jeremy Corbyn said - we will become the bargain basement of Europe.
Labour under Starmer is the darkest political prospect since medieval tyrants.
Did you see the clapping doctors and nurses behind him? Dystopian stuff!
Quelle surprise. I mean why the hell did anyone vote for Starmer's Labour? And don't say to get rid of the Tories, because the only difference was in the colour of the rosettes.
Great election results.
Fantastic budget.
Right wing old Etonians lost.
Get over it.
Close those tax loopholes.
If you ask a loaded.
@@mdhightide1860 Actually Starmer achieved far worse election results than Labour did under Corbyn in absolute terms of votes or even percentage terms, but thanks to the self-destructing Tory collapse, the corporate media rallying to his Blairite cause, and the bizarre vagaries of our nonsensical FPTP system he still got a big majority. To do what? Precisely what the Tories were doing anyway. Get over it yourself.
I said that bk in April and may of last year and I said then and I'm going to say it again the UK is bancrupt the debt we have crossed the rubicon it can't be paid back energy prices haven't gone up its the pound that's gone down we only have 1 percent of purchasing power left in the UK pound and they are going to take that last 1 percent this guy has no idea how things work
Many people I know said to get rid of the Tories. I said there is no difference between the parties. Plus it's all a sham we don't live in a democracy but a shamocrasy. The British political elite decided Starmer was the new globalist neo liberal pro genocide Zionist and warmonger they wanted.
@DarrenSmith-tq2xz Checking the £ to $ rate, it seems it's the same now as it was in 2016, so it's curious you think the recent rise in energy rates in the last couple of years is a result of a £ that's as strong now as it was a decade. I guess the energy companies were just 8 years late in their adjustments?
As for the debt, lol. I would really love to know who you debt watchers think the debt is owed to. Because it seems to me that if the UK can't pay back its debt, then it's the people who are owed the debt who have a problem. As for how bad the debt actually is, in 2020 the national debt was 81% of GDP.
In 1919 it was 135% of GDP.
In 1923 it was 181% of GDP.
In 1947 after WW2 it was 238% of GDP.
I'm no history boff, but if we didn't go bankrupt then, I struggle to see why you think we're suddenly going to go bankrupt now. But then you're clearly the expert here so who am I to question you, random TH-cam poster, when facts exist.
Spot on. Thanks to Prem Sikka and Crispin. 👍👏
We are rushing into the extreme right being seen as the alternative. Dangerous times
Mr Prem Sikka always 👍
good show
For the first time since I was 18 I could not vote Labour because of Starmer and his lack of information for what he was going to do if he won the Election he just kept quite lots of us noticed this so I voted Green always good to hear from Prem and he is right Thanks Crispin
Two cheeks of the same backside,by warned us.
Bring back Jeremy Corbyn
An excellent summary of this tory government (ironically it's a labour government). Unbelievable what starmer has done to ordinary people.
Excellent, and great guest!
Starmer is not Labour . If you want Labour, its Jeremy Corbyn .
I think I can go as far as saying that these red tories are far worse than the previous blue tories, and that should not be possible (but it is).
Welcome back from your 15 year holiday on Mars....
@@stevebrooks9119 I don't like Mars. There's just no atmosphere
@@stevebrooks9119 Starmer is in charge during Covid. What do you think happens?
We need to help and support George Galloway and the Workers Party.
No thanks, GG has some pretty horrid views
@@FSMDogSo who is the legitimate alternative with a leader that can appeal to all?
@@FSMDog worse than Starmer Blair and Mandelson?
I concur. Truth telling is our only hope left. Our people need to wake up.
@@charliebrandt2263 We have to hit rock bottom as a nation before the majority wake up to who is really on their side. I'm optimistic but God only knows what the timeline is.
I knew what we would get - so didnt vote for it - I voted Green
A poor decision, given the Green Party's record of attacking trade unionists in the only council they have held power - Brighton & Hove. Also, the Green Party are now pro-war since deciding to become full-on supporters of NATO.
More of the same
And me. Although I was a Labour member for almost forty years.
So did I.
Prem is excellent. Everything he says on Twitter/X is worth reading.
You know you're doing something right when the faithful red Tories feel the need to stick their privileged snouts into the debate.
What's the alternative? Reform and Musk? I'd rather leave the country
The alternative was George Galloways Workers Party, but a lot who would have voted for them voted for reform instead and thanks to 'raeli meddling the party won no seats in parliament.
I think the Green Party. They are second to Labour in about 40 seats and the more votes they get the more the pressure on labour from the left.
@@AlanWarrenBelfastArchitect A vote for the Green Party would not be "pressure from the left" given their track record of attacking workers when controlling Brighton & Hove Council. Most of the left departed the Green Party (myself included) between 2012 and 2014 when the Greens were attacking low-paid council employees, causing three years of on-off strikes. The Green Party have shifted even further to the right since then since abandoning their anti-war position and becoming full-on supporters of NATO, and cheerleaders of the Nazi regime in Ukraine.
Reform millionaires
Many have and are leaving the country. If you can, get out while you can!
I would rate Starmer's performance as excellent -this is what he has delivered: New Scotland poll points to big pro-independence majority in 2026 - and an SNP landslide in the next UK general election.
Thank you Crispin, you are saving the day on the left every time, and Prem too.
Meanwhile Novara Media claim Reeves' budget was unfairly criticized, and give a fawning interview to a dinosaur of Neo liberal economic mythology.
Ruchir Sharma is allowed to spout discredited "balanced budget" nonsense unchallenged, and promote a proto-austerity mindset which if taken to its logical conclusion would be the end of Britain as a modern country. Bastani (I'm smart cuz I read the Guardian and the FT too), the compatible left-presenting-liberal interviewer nods along in agreement.
Novara is a joke.
There is zero possibility of us building 1.5 million houses. Where are we going to build them that has the services in place? Sewerage treatment, water supplies, electricity, schools and hospitals, feeder roads etc. Not enough skilled labour.
The land needs to be purchased, schemes designed and planning permission obtained. That is only the start of the process. Other approvals are required, work tendered and houses constructed. If you started today, you would be lucky to be selling the first houses 2 years from now.
One of the priorities that this country needs to do is invest in the cheapest forms of energy production and storage. It is currently on shore wind, followed by hydro. If we have lower energy bills we may find that our competitiveness in some industries improves, brick making, steel and cement production. Would also help reduce everyone's energy bills.
@AlanWarrenBelfastArchitect or 28 hospitals, the buffoon Johnson said he would get built. 1 hospital got renovated.
I don't see any way we can get a proper Labour government this year, or anything like one, unless the vast majority of the present Labour mps were somehow, tragically, to get wiped out, a General election were to be called, and Jeremy Corbyn and his independent colleagues were to form an alliance with those actual socialists that were all that remained of the Labour party, together with George Galloway's WS party, with people of the calibre of Craig Murray being elected, and they were prepared to form an alliance with the Greens, the SNP, Plaid Cwmru & maybe even the Lib. Dem.s - on the basis that any government formed would change the voting system, would devolve powers to the regions more, and would actually behave like a left of centre Government.
Also on my wish list, that won't occur of course, would be things like the arraignment of Boris Johnson and others on grounds of mendaciousness, questionable probity (or even corruption) and poor judgement (Lis Truss is one of many who spring to mind in the last regard, there being many others who I could name, but won't - some of which might be controversial choices for some - on the basis of their bad governance, and their colluding with and justifying of war-mongering and genocide). This, I fear, is the stuff of dreams, but it's a lot better, imo, than the nightmare of either more of the same, or, Gawd forbid, an alliance between Tories and Reform to misgovern us.
Your idea is the one I agree with. Maybe the independent's should just be the focus as that way local people are more likely to get a good representative finally. Party politics seems to be quite restrictive in some respects as many people don't like George Galloway.
@@Pomegranate_David I have my misgivings about some of GG's pronouncements and attitudes as well, but I think you may be missing my point. The left is very good at being argumentative with itself, in-fighting and nit picking over small, or maybe not quite so small differences. What's required, if anything is going to change, is to set aside differences and for the left to work together, but eliminate those elements, which / who are plainly traitorous infiltrat-ions/-ors. That doesn't mean that only "Working Class" people should be included - Tony Benn would have been excluded on that basis, but people who call themselves socialists who, at best, could be called champagne socialists, and people who, like Starmer, would be unable to sign up to a basic leftist agenda, or who are just entryist careerists, such as Blair, Campbell or Mandelson, should not be welcomed.
On the other hand, the idea that good candidates were being deselected by H.O. / Starmer is anathema, and should, imo, tell us all that there is something badly wrong with a party that has been taken over by the right of the PLP!, which has become, itself, further right than is good for democratic balance, and has, imo, lost the party the right to call itself by the name it suborns by its' policies. Furthermore, I have an idea that, should the swp stand in those northern seats it lost to Labour next time round, they (including Craig Murray, were he to stand in Blackburn again) would stand a far better chance of winning.
But arguing over the things that would stop a coalition of progressives is counter-productive and would only lead to the possible success of a more far right coalition, were that to take shape.
@@robertdavidson8028 I like George myself but I'm just considering that he is marmite on certain issues to the left. I agree people should set aside their differences for the greater good but I feel despair in all honesty as I see no unity. But maybe if driven to a even more right wing direction by the Farage supporters and everyone finally seeing him for the charlatan he is we might get a real alternative emerge. We need the disgruntled right to come over to our side too.
This is why the left never wins. Boris Johnson actually adopted some of Corbyn's policies and made a genuine attempt to improve things. You should have supported him to keep Starmer out, yet you fall for the nonsense and play personality politics.
how quickly we forget.this man is a tory.
I'm amazed that anyone expected much different.
The only game in town in the UK is asset price inflation for the benefit of the elite . . . . ratio of UK external debt is 2.75 times GDP, (Consumption depressed). . . USA external debt to GDP is 0.95. . . .tells you all you need to know about the intended direction of travel of the economy.
Starmer is so nauseating he even makes Farage an acceptable alternative.
I would never trust Farage as far as I could throw him. (Too frail to even go further than just lifting him!)
Keir Starmer and the Labour Party wanted to remain in the European Union, complete with its right-wing, neo-liberal economic policies and austerity programme, so not sure why anyone is surprised by what Labour is doing in government.
@TREVORALLMAN rejoin now. For the sake of the next generation REJOIN.
@@mdhightide1860 💩
Finance hasn't had any regulations we are going to see a great weath transfer and the dod Frank act will be inacted
Prem for PM. 👂
all these experts are ok only heard by us not by 90% of people on the street
Britain is bancrupt we are not the 6 Richiest country in the world we have 1 percent of purchasing power left in our currency fact
Re David Miller
th-cam.com/video/sk33Oxo82yk/w-d-xo.htmlsi=pSZU6Cijf7GD5h8h
Why do you do these surveys with the people that subscribe to you.. That's akin to saying. I asked 100 people with the same opinion as me and 99 agreed.
How is that representative of the population at all?
Also quite curious.. You seem to suggest starmer is no good, but the public will go to the right in the next election, if that's the case how doesnt that suggest starmer isn't "right enough" for the public? They'd lurch to the left wouldn't they, if he wasn't left enough? What's your view on this?
The same reason gb news do polls.
@@firestarter1888to create a pointless eco chamber? Any benefit in copying this strategy from gb news?
Still in La La land mate, Starmer is an establishment plant always has been always will be even someone with your room temperature IQ isn't going to be able to deny that soon enough.
Why not look at this ge petition so far it has reaached 3016401 and still going up we need to show that the public are not behind them and that wr have no confidence in their government.Angela Raynor was a cleaner in a care home at 15 yrs as she waas pregnant and kicked out by her father but she did study for an nvq to become a care worker.
@angelafirst38 sure.. But at least say that as your evidence in your videos then. Not I asked a group of people who agree with me if they agree with me.
Blimey Crispin, Interesting sampling technique...clearly statistical sampling analysis was not high on your GCSE achievements... You couldn't have achieved a more biased sample if you'd thrown a questionnaire into a Jeremy Corbyn Memorial Fund Raising event...
I explain it’s mostly people on the left but many of my subscribers are still in Labour or voted Labour. There won’t be any Tories so from that perspective, it’s not looking good for Starmer.
@@stevebrooks9119 totally agree. A skewed survey.
How about this stat - fewer people voted Labour in 2024 than in 2019
And by the way being biased doesn't make you wrong. Ask yourself why people are biased.
Circulated on loony right websites so an expected result.
Best budget in years. Tax dodgers held to account.
A loaded survey on right wing led propaganda
Watch Prem Sikka’s comments. As an accountant, he knows about tax dodgers.
That's how it was sold to you and you've obviously bought it.
The Crispen Flintoff show is one hour is to much so get lost just gutter journalist
Come again?
Seeing that photo was enough for me
6 minutes was my limit
I’ll add some dart throws every few minutes to keep you going.