There’s tonnes of examples of states like these as solutions to problems. Whether it’s the tension between Democrats and Conservatives, the escape from the binary computing world into a superposition state or even the battle between the two hemispheres of the brain. Often the tension between two states creates a whole new system that is infinitely better than just using one approach or switching situationally. Really enjoyed this, thanks!!
Interesting. How does this make us better as a civilization? What problem does this fix? Knowing that we do this hundreds of times a day without thinking of it. I have to pay bills what does wanting to avoid falsehoods and not passing judgment or wanting to also pursue truth and therefore believing a little bit of everything have to do with anything? At the end of the day we are imperfect beings that hold perfection as a standard. and the only thing we care about is evidence. Is the evidence there to support a claim and sometimes who is better at creating or presenting evidence in a scenario is all that matters. Not philosophy.
Is conducting the process unconsciously really the same as doing it consciously and methodically? Are you submitting it to another person unconsciously? It's not Socratic dialectic if you're alone. In terms of your last point, I suggest you try to convince someone of a falsehood in an area where they are a true expert. You won't win with all of the rhetorical tricks in the world. The only people you'll convince are those who lack the understanding of the thing. But the purity of philosophy will have been preserved in spite of rhetoric. Although I teach rhetoric, it is seldom, if ever, a threat to those who know philosophy. Callard doesn't even ask her fans to protect her on Twitter; she knows that she can't be harmed in any ways that matter. Cheers!
Nice. I was annoyed when this got taken down. It's great you put it back up.
Thanks
There’s tonnes of examples of states like these as solutions to problems. Whether it’s the tension between Democrats and Conservatives, the escape from the binary computing world into a superposition state or even the battle between the two hemispheres of the brain. Often the tension between two states creates a whole new system that is infinitely better than just using one approach or switching situationally. Really enjoyed this, thanks!!
This is interesting. Basically, a more interesting and cheerful way to describe Type I verses Type II errors. 🔥
In brief, is it an inquiry method? Or discussion method? Or Question -answer method? Or lecture demonstration method?
Love this so much. When is your book coming out?
Awesome. Reading Benjamin Franklin’s autobiography is what led me to this video. Now time to do a deep dive into that haha
I love that William James is seeing more interest again...
Wow
Is that fake fire?
aside from socrates's method.. no one is gonna critically point to the fact that this agnes is a pure beauty?
“Sigh,” said the future of humanity
@@sledgehammered1765Also the present of humanity
Interesting. How does this make us better as a civilization? What problem does this fix? Knowing that we do this hundreds of times a day without thinking of it. I have to pay bills what does wanting to avoid falsehoods and not passing judgment or wanting to also pursue truth and therefore believing a little bit of everything have to do with anything?
At the end of the day we are imperfect beings that hold perfection as a standard. and the only thing we care about is evidence. Is the evidence there to support a claim and sometimes who is better at creating or presenting evidence in a scenario is all that matters. Not philosophy.
Is conducting the process unconsciously really the same as doing it consciously and methodically? Are you submitting it to another person unconsciously? It's not Socratic dialectic if you're alone. In terms of your last point, I suggest you try to convince someone of a falsehood in an area where they are a true expert. You won't win with all of the rhetorical tricks in the world. The only people you'll convince are those who lack the understanding of the thing. But the purity of philosophy will have been preserved in spite of rhetoric. Although I teach rhetoric, it is seldom, if ever, a threat to those who know philosophy. Callard doesn't even ask her fans to protect her on Twitter; she knows that she can't be harmed in any ways that matter. Cheers!
Guess I'm dumb...got nothing from this.
aum, so, something something, aum, so, something something, aum, so, right?
click on cc and it's clear as can be!