I found a new session that is ardently to me, obsessive. I do keep returning when I need to rejudge a resourceful notifiable appreciable.
Very enjoyable. Dr. Anfam is brilliant as always!
Enjoyed this very much Thank you David and Lisa
@@dr.davidanfam5151 oh wow it’s you! Brilliant discussion of the artist whose work is more moving to me than any other. Thank you for offering such depth and dimension to contextualize this work and Rothko’s legacy writ large.
This guy gets it. Good talk.
abstract expression always denied the accident during the production, I’m thinking what’s different between Jackson pollock and mark Rothko, do you think both are the abstract expressionist
멋찝니다~~~
What is with the awful music playing in the background over the panel's dialogue, it's so disruptive ... whose idea was that?
Quisiera poder entender de arte
@@rudyray4833 Ochos estrellas de diez posibles en la "escala divertida"!
I tried, but I just could not stomach this INSUFFERABLE SNOB!! I feel sorry for the lady.
THAT is a posh accent.
I cannot stand the snail's pace of this video...Lisa begins" Tonight I want to talk about me... oh me and Rothko..."
then the man begins speaking and the tortoise flew by... mind you I have been watching a lot of Camille Paglia,
so I suppose that accounts for my reaction. dislike.
I really like this talk, and both speakers, but the music is annoying, distracting, and unnecessary.
Agreed. Sadly so much so that I will not finish watching it. :-(
Totally agree. As an autistic person with adhd trying to focus on this guy talking is hard enough. I was just about to write that. Why are they trying to make it so dramatic? Bad decision whoever said put music into the background. Tut tut.