How the TOGAF® Standard benefits Enterprise Architecture (EA)

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 2 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 12

  • @saravan204
    @saravan204 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks for the brief overview of Togaf. clear and crip explanation. Much helpful!!

  • @AshishSawant-p3v
    @AshishSawant-p3v 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thanks for wonderful and more elaborated session

  • @Jukica90
    @Jukica90 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very useful and clear presentation, thank you!

  • @jbayne7761
    @jbayne7761 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I love how you introduced relationships to other practice frameworks. Would be good if you do a video focusing on the language differences for same thing. A couple of effective ways to integrate them

    • @jbayne7761
      @jbayne7761 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Have to say Open Group site is clunky and poorly designed. As a business, they dont seem to apply the frameworks they teach. Their customer service is poor. They do not provide enough on-site options, cusomer service is terrible e.g not answering calls, forcing an online exams options which is poorly designed. I prefer on site like before.
      support and customer service. Which is why having the guild is a great alternative.

  • @anshoe
    @anshoe 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    @5:30, a small organisation like a restaurant or shop, can uses many concepts from EA, probably not all parts of it. So, it is still judicious to use the EA principles for small enterprises 🙂

  • @jamesgibson3582
    @jamesgibson3582 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Method formerly known as Prince Lol Nice one! Great summary.

  • @happyhome2523
    @happyhome2523 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Very well said. Thank you.

    • @tieturi
      @tieturi  11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you!

  • @santoshkanse1920
    @santoshkanse1920 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Informative insights about TOGAF, Thanks

    • @tieturi
      @tieturi  ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you! If you have anything you'd like to know more about TOGAF, feel free to ask! ❤

    • @patrickp6676
      @patrickp6676 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      This is pretty good explanation. Thank you!