The Romanosky Bets Roulette Method
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 8 ก.ย. 2024
- This is one of the best roulette systems available. With the Romanosky bets you increase your win rate to 80% by covering 32 roulette numbers. You may not win every spin, but many players claim to win at roulette and produce profit with this strategy. Try it for yourself, test it and tell us your results.
It is an easy to understand and play beginners system and it is recommended for novice players. Inexperienced players should be disciplined and chose the bet that includes the recently hit numbers. Start with low denomination chips and if you face headwinds, stop and live to play another day. We have use it with great success and hit rate both in online roulette with live dealers and real casinos. Very easy to remember and to apply the bets on the table.
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
►Free Probabilities Calculator: • FREE Roulette Calcula...
►Best Roulette Videos Ever, Anywhere!➜ • Astonishing Roulette S...
►Casinos That Don't Cheat ➜www.roulettema...
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
►DISCLAIMER:
Roulette is a game of Luck. Your Results May Vary and you are more likely to Lose than Win.
Out videos are for entertainment and education ONLY.
Always PLAY RESPONSIBLY - www.begambleaware.org
![[TH] 2024 PMSL SEA Finals D3 | Fall | รู้ผลทีมแชมป์ พร้อมตั๋วสู่ PMGC](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/7NxsN0Ch6vk/mqdefault.jpg)
Only play in Fair Casinos ➜ www.rouletteman.com
hit a zero twice and go home
Why bother go? Just stay home. You saved money and times.
Casino table games are ment for entertainments.
But, if someone wants to try out this entertainment. At least have some kind of strategy to used to make your entertainment money last longer.
I was taught this many years ago. It's USUALLY a good way to make sure you play for a while and have fun
can you win some $$??
One loss destroys wins. The probability of loss is about 88% is higher than the probability of win.
$400 total bet
$50 chips
3 spins, profit $150
Get in. Get out. Never sit past 3 spins.
If you miss a few times numbers gets really crazy in your bank roll this is works if you stuck to minimum bets
Funciona, pero con cuidado, usarla una ver por sesión de juego, el 13% acabara apareciendo si o si, así que no la uséis dos o más veces seguidas y más si apostais importes altos, se pierde mucho y no se recupera con tanta facilidad
What happens when I lose? How to recover? Also, is there a way to combine this with Oscar’s Grind? I never recommend the martingale system. It wipes out your bankroll so quickly. Thanks, RM, your videos are fun and informative!
In all the 6 variations of it, 0 is never included, adjust it slightly and cover 0
Risk to reward won't be good by including 0, just let the casino have their 0.
You are risking 8 units to win 1 unit. Not a good long term strategy.
86.6% cover repeater sections of 12... on uncovered 12 use the 2 chips on neighbor corners
Yes it is. You just dont know the sauce. I'm make millions with this. If you lose just marty all the amounts and recoup then jump back down
J aco 😂😂😂 the only person making millions with that strategy is the casino!!
Only one who is winning long term strategy is casino, cuz there is no such thing.
It’s made for 4 wins and a out!!! Not hours at the table
I tested it and it worked for a while but you have to have a huge starting bankroll for big profit, with that lot of coverage you can really win alot of bets in a row, recovery from losses tho hurts, you have to either win 2x quadruple or 1x8 unit or 4x double. It is still luck but not as stupid as martingale. I Like 27 straight up more.
Yuppp..27 straight..if u lose double n win two bets.........then back to 1.......right? U need to big bnk roll...
Big risk, small reward. This strategy suck. Mine is alot better but can't share my money maker yet
If it quacks like a duck, etc....probability aint reality bro All it takes is 1 Bad Run, you chase it (you don't know it's a long loser) and bye bye profits😭
If you square up at the table…. Bring serious cash. 3k minimum.
Otherwise, you’re going to get squeezed out by the odds at some point and not have the funds to recover.
Start with $200…. 50 checks (to cover every other street= 6 per spin) $50 in quarters to level up the bet when red/black hasn’t hit in 3spins and $100 in nickels to keep you in play on the outside columns/12’s each spin.
Martingale your odds/evens and color bets…
Watch the board for column/12’s trends… bet where it’s cold….. NOT hot.!!
I have a commercial wheel/table in my kitchen. I play three times a day. I play until I hit 3k in profit. Sometimes I need to bring out the pocket money $2800 spare to see a Martingale through. But if you have the liquidity… the house will ALWAYS lose.
Great Idea..
You will always leave Vegas with a vehicle much more money.
You go in a 50,000 dollar Cadillac and you leave in a 300,000 dollar Greyhound..
Overoptimistic? Do that only if you can afford to lose. Because there are no guarantees or easy wins in roulette. See: th-cam.com/video/8QwpVBPr9y4/w-d-xo.html
@@RouletteMan
I must strongly disagree with you. The games very beatable. But not with stupid progressions like the Martingale. Or traditional loser strategies that play off the layout.
The game is very beatable with the RIGHT APPROACH. And im not talking about biased wheels or cheating computers. Or collusion with a croupier.
Im talking about a simple strategy that owns this game. Without risking a fortune.
@@fender1000100 Okay, tell us more.
people like youu..im sure you always loose,,,loose with your mindset
@@fender1000100 what works?
but 2 chips on black and a double up seams better.
This is the best strategy I have encountered among all the videos thank you I am making money now....
Thank you very much Anil
So, if you used this system for 100 spins.
86 times you would win £5 = £430
14 times you would lose £40 = £560
I won't be trying it any time soon.
Percentage of wins on its own is meaningless without considering risk/reward ratio.
Only a fool would bet 100 spins
If you are semi smart bet on few spins and walk out with some profit
If you are smart stay away from gambling
That’s basically casinos for you.. long term they ALWAYS win.
Good luck finding any system that beats roulette with plain maths
@@akmuthafuka7453 Thats correct!!
Give me a casinos games that would have risk/rewards ratio in the players favor? None.
8 chips *13,5 = 108% you will -8% every time in 50%chance to win
For a flat stake this system will always fail, so everything is about increasing the bet after a loss. Theoretically if you have an infinite bank and you always multiply your initial bet after one loss as he says, you will finally win. But in reality if you really have a bank of millions (to be covered for a lot of consecutive failures) probably there are a lot more exciting ways to invest your money than playing roulette and win less than 30$/hour (I am not sure there are 30 spins in one hour and for sure you will not win all the rounds). No millionaire is happy to make less than 200$/day, it doesn't even cover an expensive hotel room. This strategy is good only if you won the lottery and you have no idea what to invest your money in yet :)
Always avoiding one number, zero, handicaps a person with an Achilles heel. Biasing one number for another creates difficulties.
When i was in vegas the ball hit red 33 times in a row. No one really won. Because 1. The opposite has to come. 2. They lost too much progessive betting for it too matter
@@HarryPotter-ny1pd sure dude. the world record is 32 but of course you saw it hitting 33 times.... cmon
@@tomasscorreia2574 there’s millions of roulette wheels in the world… it’s not outside the realm of possibility that he saw this… I’ve only been gambling a few years and have seen same color 15-20 times straight multiple times.
This is the type of system I would use if I needed $1000, and I do not wish to spend my own money. I would consider risking $8000 for this. Yes, and I will only do this system once in my lifetime, just once. And no, not recommended for novices.
Thks for sharing buddy. Cheers
You are covering 86.5% of the wheel. You have to win 8 out of 9 times to get back to even.That is 88.9%. So you are at a 2.4% disadvantage just to break even. To get ahead you must win 9 out of 10 times or 90% after a loss. That disadvantage is 3.5%. If you just bet any of the outside even money payout bets your disadvantage is 2.7%. And if you only lose half your bet when a 0 comes out, then your disadvantage falls to 1.35%. Also ,whenever you use a negative progression method you are setting yourself up for a disaster.
I lost in my 1st spin..everything depends on luck
If you have a large bankroll, double your chips and switch to another placement of the chips. But yeah, everything depends on luck.
Need a big bankroll you can't loose on this bets after a few spins
LUCK? This shit gives an advantage over the casino with a 80%, if you win you gain money, its a good strategy
@@itsluis8684 U never have an advantage over the casino... don't forget that its dangerous
Doing simple math. Out of 100 times you will win 86 on average. 86x1 86. And you will lose 16 times x 9 chips which is 144 loss. 144-86=-58
You don't have top play 100 times.
You did the second part of the math wrong. Out of 100 times you will win 86 on average, correct. And you will lose 14 times x 8 chips = 112. So you'd be down 26 units. The house always has an advantage.
In conclusion, this method is probably good just to make quick money for one or two rounds only.
I tried this and this is effective. I just upgrade the system. My bank roll is 8000. If my 800 lose i put 2700 in column and 900 inside bet to cover the losses. I never lose 2 straight so i keep on recovering my losses.
What? That doesn't make any sense.
I understand your thinking, but 2 in a row loss does happen which is crazy expensive . I've seen it twice in one day while testing. This will get you eventually and you'll lose big! (72 units loss is hard to make up)
Lost 8 on 1st spin and 64 on 2nd. = 72
it works, just can't be scared off by a couple losses, if ya aint got the bank roll then don't play, stick to ya 9-5
So very true for many strategies. Bankroll importance. It is over 30% as a parameter of a winning strategy. Most players have inadequate bankroll for their strategies.
2 weeks ago I doubled up on red/black every time I lost. Then when i won I would go back to one chip. I was 80 pound up. I had a loosing streak and I lost 900 pound. So people who have large bankrolls should also be prepared to risk there whole bankroll. I'm 18 years old that's alot of money for me to loose in 20 minutes.
@@quangoiv4020 Nope , cause you didnt have discipline ... should STOP at certaing amount and leave.
I rather have a 14% chance to win 8 chips with an 86% chance to lose 1 chip.
Then do the opposite. Only bet on the remaining numbers
You are a gambler not a player
Then you will have to be the casino...
@@omigator That could backfire, too. Murphy's Law. :)
Pure Luck , those missing numbers are going to catch you and wipe you out!
David Wirth it's amazing how often those uncovered numbers pop up. I play this but normally only for a couple of spins with high stakes.
yes ive been there :( its just flip the risk, if you very unlucky, you wiped
David Wirth exactly don't play American roulette
Right!!!
What happens when table minimum is required for both inside AND outside bets?
If the minimum bet on outside is $10 and min on inside is $1 you can
bet $5 on inside and $15 on outside to keep it proportional to bets shown.
So you risk $40 to win $5 lolz
Everything does depend on luck. I’ll be trying this strategy next time I’m at the casino.
This isn’t really luck, its an 80% chance for profit, that’s not very lucky
Used this same method at an American roulette table and was able to play all night long breaking even most times. It’s a decent way to play for a while with a small bank roll
do u know the odds of losing twice,tthree times
I'd love this on a single zero table
He’s showing you on a single zero table.
Short visits, sessions with a 200$ investment wins 200 in 8 spins.. take a dozen spins off if see a zero on the marquis
Exactly
Do you realize what a 2.6% disadvantage does?
Just double whats the problem
You will lost 112 chips and win 86 in 100 games so you cant win with this metode
Average played 37 games u will win 32 times 1 chips= 32 chips
but u will lose 5 times 8 chips= 40 chips
So average u will lose 8 chips after 37 games!
Guys correct me here if I am wrong but at the tables what I can play a dozen only pays 2:1 so if I bet 3 chips of 1 euro I will get 6 back so I lose 2 euros every spin I don't get a number from the 8 I bet and only then I win 1 chip... It only makes sense if your tables pay 3:1 on dozens
A simple calculation shows that in 1000 spins profit will be 865*1$-135*8$=-215$ You can't beat the house over time. You just lie to yourself saying that you have a sistem. If they remove that 0 we could talk about it. Increasing your bets would not help either in time.
The house edge remains the same no matter what. This doesn't mean though that you should throw your chips on the roulette table without any strategy..
Expected result at long run = 86,5%*(+1) + 13,5%*(-8) = - 0,215
Thus, after 100 rounds, it´s expected you to *lose* $21.5
unless you have the bankroll to martingale losses, so if you loose once, you have to 8x the initial bet, that means doubling up 3 times on the first loss.
Exactly, So you win 1 dollar every 86.5 times on avg, but you lose 13.5 on avg at 8 dollars, so 13.5 x 8 is gross loss of 108. Net win is -21.5. So your "Win Rate is losing $21.5. Do the math before you select any roulette strategy my friends.
Now I know why adaptive program put after number 31 34 ....haha
In Sum you loose in 100 spins 26 Chips. Where is the profit?
in poker terms here, pot odds are horrible. you are betting 40, to make 5. i would have to win 8 times in a row to get just one more spin on the wheel. you would have to go on a hell of a run to make this worth it.
I don't care what strategy you have. The longer you play the more money you going to lose... now this system might work but you better bet big and when you win walk away because they going to Target you and that ball will fall on zero or one of them numbers you not covering six to eight times...trust me
its like the dealer knows how to throw the ball to hit the numbers
So on average with every 37 spins you will lose 8 units
No.
@@RouletteMan 32x1 = 32, 5x8 = 40, 32 - 40 = -8
Pero en caso de perder?
It's nice. But when you loose, you loose hard. Regaining losses is costly.
TRUE
Yeah u lose 8 spins worth
Martingale you lose hard
Funniest video ever. Exactly what NOT to do. Guaranteed to lose.
That video has been made for loosers , Guys this method will bring you to the bottom , there is atleast 10 or 12 better methods how to bet on roulette in youtube . Thanks
@@dididada203 I disagree but to each there own!
@@dididada203 well which one smart man
@@DT-ol6nj here one, 90% win rate.
3 or 4 # that will wipe out (based on 1 or 2 zero table).
$30 required per spin. Lost $30 or profit $6 per spin.
10 units on the 2nd and 3rd columns.
1 unit each on #1 to 10.
If any numbers, 1 to 10 hit. Profit 6 units.
Any 2nd or 3rd column hit, breakeven.
It can be moved around, as long 3 or 4 # opened.
Stupid stragety when you lose which you will it's almost impossible to recover
True
We welcome your feedback. All comments are published, except those that contain inappropriate words.
Consider the American roulette, and every number neighbours, sum them to get 212 units on all numbers if you assign a unit to every number. Then try to use a combination of numbers covered and betting value that will provide you with 212 units won if all the choosen numbers do hit once. For American Roulette this might be acomplished with 53 units covering 32 numbers. I often choose 32 units on high or low and 7 splits with 3 units each. The average return is ( 6 + 5/8) units, returns 1/8 of a loss. After every losing number hit, i simpky add the initial bet amount, and set a limit of 212 units on the table . I do this for 19 spins, win prob. is 16/19 and loss prob is 3/19.
A better aproach would be the following: treat the numbers covered by the split bets that return only one unit as losing numbers. You end up with 20 losing numbers with a loss of ( 15 + 1/5) and 18 winning numbers returning 11 units. Try to hold to a ratio of 7 W to 5 L or better adding the multiple of 53 units you are betting with to the denominator if you lose and to the numerator if you win. You end up being at least one unit ahead.
I like your channel but I wish you would post the actually probabilities of winning. None are over 50% but it would be good to know which ones are the best in comparison.
The best🎉
You win 1 dollar every 86.5 times on avg, but you lose 13.5 on avg at 8 dollars, so 13.5 x 8 is gross loss of 108. Net win is -21.5. So your "Win Rate is losing $21.5. Do the math before you select any roulette
strategy my friends. You didn't calculate the payout schedule 1:8, so you have to win 8 times per loss hence 86.5^8= 31.34% winning rate not 86% Math is a powerful tool...
RouletteMan
How much profit have you made with the Romanosky bet strategy ? Probably all theory but in reality loses money any session it's played ? Like earnings have to be realistic @ $200 + +, not $5 or $10 profit ?
Thanks for you comment/question. We welcome questions and discussion.
1. Realistic earnings is dependent on your initial bankroll and can not exceed 10% of it. After you increase your bankroll 10% end the session and come to casino another time. So for a $200 profit you need minimum a $2000 bankroll.
2. In the video we mainly explained how you place the bets. You can not just place the bets and expect the profits to increase. To have to use a wagering plan, increase bets after loses or increase bets after wins or whatever. In 4:00 minute of the video we briefly describe such a betting plan as "slow up-as-you lose progression". One needs to think more about this and try various betting plans and see what works for him and what doesn't.
Its better use red/black ,method every time you lose 1 dollar bet on red or black you double the amount to recover lost if you win you continue bet with one color you need at least $100 starting bankroll easiest way to win roulette🤑🤑🤑
Or evens and odds
i have played twice in two days and lost zero came out twice,do u think i was conned
Great system!!!
Its good strategy but thing is that once you lost 8 chips then you have to win 8 times,
Btw i think baccarat have more high chances of winning than roulette
Just increase to $64 will recover the last bet
@@carlbrown6295 how
The odds are great, but losing 8 chips versus winning 1 chip should luck not be in your favor... ouch.
You must be rich by now
😂😂😂😂
This a poor strategy. Risking too many units to just make 1. Also, one loss would wipe out all your profit.
DO NOT USE THIS STRATEGY.
well the think is even if its above 80% wr still if u win 8 times in a row but u only lose once u will go back to where u started its a good strategy but if someone is unlucky he would lose a lot I guess
rthis is not 86% win beaause you bet 8 unit to win one you shout win 9 time to make a real profit so the real calculation shoud be 86%÷6=10.75%
youre right. 10 % vs 14% (casinos chance)
Probably one of the worst strategies I have seen in here. Not only are you risking 8 chips to have a 12.5% ROI, if you loose the first spin you have to 8X your initial bet (64 chips total) just to recover the loses. If you manage to loose again you now have to bet 512 chips.
true, you are paying more for a more chance of winning your bet - simple as that.
Yeah, you have the mindset that you must immediately recoup your losses and risk going deeper in the hole. If you lose the 8 unit bet maybe look to make a 32 unit bet (12-12-4-4) to recoup half of it, then the same bet again, or just win it once (half back) and go back to original bet. Or just increase to a 6-6-2-2 bet and win 2-3 of those, then go back to original. Gradual increases until you recouped most or all previous losses, reduce bet size after that. Have a stop-loss like 20% bankroll per session, bet accordingly. Walk when 5% profit. Not saying it's a sure-win strategy, but could work.
No system can win over the long term.
if you play odds, not percentages
In the long run we will be dead anyway. Who cares about the long run? It is a theoretical construction will little practical use.
@@RouletteMan 86% win results 86 x 1 chip profit..=86..///14% lose..14 x8....matematics beat you..
You obviously have never heard of FIVE. It is one system to RULE THEM ALL.
No steep martingales. Thats for fools. You win at roulette by finding a constant OFF THE LAYOUT. Fools play the layout. It is designed for you TO LOSE.
You must think outside of the box. Or in this case outside of the layout.
Roulette is a PERCENTAGE GAME. And when you throw it in percentages arena. The number 100. You really learn what is and what isnt POSSIBLE. I studied its behaviour in that arena for two years. Made money on paper for a year then started making money for real. For the last 8 years this has been my income. My living.
@@fender1000100 Teach me master.
I have seen several of their strategies now. Wow! It's like they gave No clue of relative simply math.
This strategy really sucks.
This is -EV (negative expected value) if you consider the Variance in long term betting. The possibility of the system is still a -0.215 and if you happen to offend the Gamble God when variance are hitting you, the Probability of Run Bad can be a disaster.
It's just like tossing a coin, 50% chances of getting a Head and 50% of the time you get the Tail but that is based on every individual toss, not LONG TERM. Say if you toss it 100 times, who dare guarantee that the result will be 50-50? or who dare say you will get a sure win on either Head or Tail?
So...this is not gonna work.
That is why il only use this as a hit and run strategy
If you want close to 50/50 (47.8%) win and with less money spread out. Just bet the outside only.
Red/black, odd/even, or 1-18/19-36. Lest capital per spin
All bets are -EV in roulette, in any and all combinations.
The klink bet
beting 8 to get 1 is just dumb,no matter the odd of 86%,you can put 35 chips on numbers and that will give 98% and you will still lose
Went to casino in Reno and you can't only put 2 on the inside. Have to put 5 in there so cant do the bet
as long you have the minimum covered, it doesnt matter the chip value.....youre counting units.
@@garylazar3936 no if this was a $10 minimum table how would you cover with 8 $1 units?
exactly!
easy remember
Doesn't work on Bovado with a live dealer. The outside bets are $5 minimum. so if you use just $1 on inside corner bet and win you lose a $1.00.
James on bovada instead of doing 3 3 on the outside bet just use 6 6 and raise the two inside bets to 2 instead of 1
"Repeats of the recent numbers are very common in roulette" ... this is complete BS! Quit spreading mis-information. Every spin is independent of the last and each number has the same exact odds of hitting on every spin. Any patterns or repeats are strictly random.
Being random doesn't mean they are not common. For more repeat statistics see th-cam.com/video/ZTWgSWxcQHs/w-d-xo.html
@@RouletteMan no number can be statistically more common than any other number because EACH NUMBER HAS THE SAME EXACT ODDS ON EVERY SPIN!
Also, since computer generated randomness is not truly random I'm referring strictly to actual physical roulette wheels.
Just tried in one free roulette. 3 spins, no hit. Would be -8 * 3 =- 24 chips.
You can change what ever you want, there is no strategy for roulette. It’s an almost 50/50 game on every spin so how should it be possible?
The only closest to 50/50 bet are the outside ( if there where no Zero). With zero. It's 47.4/47.4%.
Profit game is blek and rad
I always loosing 😢😢
A rather slow way to win, and when hit on those 5 uncovered numbers, will lose all the previous profits you have made :(
So basically just cover all numbers via 5 for 86.5% chance of winning
hahahah yes, thats what i see
The "86% win rate" is really a joke at best. If you do the math, you always have the chance of losing more irrespective of what strategy you use for betting due to the house edge. So really, the betting strategy should be talking about the "profit rate" rather than "win rate". This is just a nice ploy to market a "strategy". How about this? Put a chip on every number, now you have a "100% win rate.. wow!
Not really cuz if the 0,00 hit you lose $36
8 chips = 1 chip gained. If you lose, you lose 8 chips, take ages to recover. Not a great strategy tbh
I lost $200 using that method. Thanks...
Richard, do yourself a favor and stop gambling. Find another hobby. Gambling will steal your hard earned money and severely deplete your bank account. These "systems" are created by people who are too lazy and immature to work for a living.
Stop saying things that aren t true.There is no mathematical system that can win în roulette. So,STOP.
All think they control by remote...u r not play they are play with you ...
We have in the works an amazing documentary regarding unfair roulette games. Stay tuned! None should miss that!
DONT PLAY. YOU WILL LOSE IT ALL
did it happen to you?
? very Bad System...Roulette normally has 97% Chance...
European Roulette has 2,7% house edge (rake, vig) but this doesn't mean you win 97,3% of the time. It means that on a win it pays out 2,7% less than the fair odds.
How often you win is dependent on how many numbers you bet (and luck of course).
Of course, the statistics always come true on a long time and hundreds or thousands of games.
U r not explaining it right maybe
Not betting 0 when you have multiple outside bets is one of the dumbest mistakes you can make in roulette.
Hi Fievel: Finally, someone who knows the importance of the Zero when betting outside bets. Have a great Day!
This can not be bet on machines.
Dong lose much don’t win much crap system
Wrong logic
If you lose one game you will be lose money 8 times
It is possible to win.
But there is no guarantee.
You RISK Losing ur money.
I' Use center strategy to play center Ball 8-13 (5Number/1$) every 10-17spin u have chance to win 8-13 Nmbr but u must wait firts, don't play every Round if u win Change another Table Wait it hit and run
This strategy has alot of win rate, but one loss will have you need 8 wins to breakeven so not worth as by losing 3 times u fucked lol
👌
Just loss $300🤦🏻♂️🤦🏻♂️👌🏾
This has a negative mathematical expectation. Don't waste your time and money.
It does for the traditional mindset and approach. But that doesnt meant the game cannot be beatem longterm. Ive made my living from roulette for the last 8 years.
And my approach is unlike anything pushed on all these uploads you see floating around social media.
If you play it right you can make $500. per day.
We wont be as optimistic as you. But you can give a good fight 😀
You can't make 500 per day with this system...It doesn't work
@@phantoms-theinfiniteblack5083 If your unit size is 500 and you bet one time only, you have an 86% chance to win 500.
Luck is important
its no good
Not good at all
Needs 00
XD lets say those are 100$ chips. Bet 800$ to win 900$ ( 100$ profit). YE SURE XD HAHAHAHHAHA