3.24 Major Tractor Beam Change - Detailed Testing | Other Major 3.24 Changes 4k

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 27 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 191

  • @MathiasBronnes
    @MathiasBronnes 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +32

    I really liked the gear storage method thats in the ptu now. Fast and easy. Makes sense that you need to access a terminal.

    • @BGIANAKy
      @BGIANAKy 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      Imagine them finally doing stuff we want.
      Now they need to remove master modes

    • @Retr0101_
      @Retr0101_ 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      @@BGIANAKy "remove master modes" is amazingly dense, without master modes the game would be an unbalanced mess like it used to be

    • @eavdmeer
      @eavdmeer 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      ​​@@Retr0101_I beg to differ. There are plenty of other ways to balance things. MM has arguably unbalanced the game more than it ever was. More firepower is now an automatic win in a 1v1, which it never was and never should be. Agility is virtually gone completely from the equation. Could be that MM is the 'dense' take

    • @ChristoffRevan
      @ChristoffRevan 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      ​@@eavdmeerEh, you and the BGIANAKy guy are still dense because you aren't looking at the bigger picture. Once we get Maelstrom (physicalised damage) combined with engineering gameplay, it's going to remove the problem of DPS racing as ships won't have HP bars like they do now. Small ships will become glass cannons though, but the larger medium ships as well as large/capital ships will almost never get destroyed but merely disabled.

    • @TheWasd1234
      @TheWasd1234 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      ​@@BGIANAKy disliked to kingdom come

  • @Gates54
    @Gates54 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thanks Foxy! We can always count on you to test this stuff for us!

  • @DoomTater86
    @DoomTater86 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I love your detailed testing videos, I really appreciate how you check everything!

  • @jmor7707
    @jmor7707 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Best SC info channel on youtube.

  • @rakc1027
    @rakc1027 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I'm glad that they gave larger tractor beams a purpose

  • @brandondallon6203
    @brandondallon6203 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks Foxy for being a good tester. Please keep doing these type of videos.
    I actually like these changes. I always though the range on the handheld should be alot closer. I imagine it would be used to carry something along with you as you run around.

  • @CMDR_Raspewtin
    @CMDR_Raspewtin 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Makes sense to me that the max lift is the way to go for big SCU cargo loading/unloading. Always felt that lifting such large objects with a tiny hand-held device was unrealistic! Thanks for the demo!

  • @brimstone5931
    @brimstone5931 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    That's a good heads up on the new limits on Tractor Beams. I would rather have it explained in a video rather than find out in game and be confused for a while.
    Very Informative, thanks for sharing Foxy

  • @mitchelvandermeer1421
    @mitchelvandermeer1421 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks for testing these test tracktorbeams so size and weight matters actually nice balance

  • @Leptospirosi
    @Leptospirosi 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Nice explanation about the new tractor beam system. A test about tractor beans on ships would also be interesting, like the Hull C you have in the hangar, to check range and weight reactions

  • @Nosdeblack
    @Nosdeblack 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Your channel is trully necessary!!! Thank you for all of it!

  • @Mor4me
    @Mor4me 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thanks for the info,
    I really appreciate the format 👍👍

  • @Gofr5
    @Gofr5 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Interesting tractor beam changes. This will also make ship tractor beams a lot more useful and attractive too. I'm quite sure they will be able to move and rotate boxes much faster. The C1 and Taurus will love this.

  • @DanteSerrano007
    @DanteSerrano007 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I love the fact that while increasing the payout on cargo missions, they curb-stomp the tools we use to do them, sending our effort through the roof. Here's the thing... Would you ever even bother with it if your cordless drill couldn't do more than 50% (preferably 75%) of what your powered drill can? Doesn't that make it more of a cordless TOY? The multitool tractor beam and the max lift tractor beam are in the same relationship. Is the Max-lift 100 meters? Then hand-held is at a minimum 50 meters, preferably 75 meters. If this were a "real" invention, would anyone ever even bother with the multi-tool tractor, or is it just now a ... child's toy? Hey, Kids! It's the NEW Wow-Blast multitool!

    • @Arkrilok
      @Arkrilok 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Good point. Definitely could have had a one is better relationship without making one useless.

    • @Gofr5
      @Gofr5 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Max lift takes up a rifle weapon slot, multitool doesn't. Sure doesn't matter when you're just in your hangar moving things, but if you're out and about shooting things and then see something you want to bring back to your ship, the multitool will still be useful there because I'm quite sure one doesn't bring a max lift in to a firefight. Though when in your hangar, yeah, no point not to use the max lift at all times.

  • @EdwardDragon96
    @EdwardDragon96 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The problem with the itembank changes is that the inventory runs like sh*t again.
    Thats probably the reason we had the drawer.

  • @thechroniclesofcriss942
    @thechroniclesofcriss942 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    the change to the personal item storage interface is a big W. now we just need CIG to decrease the icon sizes in the hangar cargo interface to match.

  • @anferFFmax
    @anferFFmax 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This was incredibly helpful. Next video I would like to see a comparison with Beams from ships vs these.

  • @sanbon909
    @sanbon909 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The item bank kiosk change is fantastic. This is a very nice compromise.

  • @klebbe1
    @klebbe1 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Had a strange issue on the PTU earlier today, the Maxlift could lift 32 SCU boxes, but not if they were on a grid.
    Once i removed them from the cargolift grid with the ships tractor beam the Maxlift had no issues however.

  • @MultiFishslayer
    @MultiFishslayer 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Love your videos!
    thanks for your videos, lots of good info!

  • @erankel3949
    @erankel3949 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Love that update. multitool is good for testing but specialist gear will have to become the norm for "heavy lifting".

  • @nikoulph
    @nikoulph 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    wooaaa nice one for the personal inventory

  • @Eden_North
    @Eden_North 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    While it still needed work, I thought the purpose of the drawer was to separate items from a backend inventory server where all of our stuff is stored and move the items we wanted to actively use to the live server, freeing up server resources. Not sure I'm explaining it right. Just like when you first spawn into a new patch, all the ships you own are not immediately available at your home location, you have to deliver them.
    Awesome testing, you rock.

    • @hubertaurelien1144
      @hubertaurelien1144 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I thought the same ! Imo, they step back with the drawer to find another way freeing backend inventory services

  • @roninspoon3935
    @roninspoon3935 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I back my Spirit up to the freight elevator, and have been for a while now. Careful with the larger boxes and your ramp. The box can glitch through the ramp and make your ship breakdance.

  • @JClif
    @JClif 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks for showing the tracker beam limitations. I have been wondering what the load / length was for each tracker beams guns. many thanks

  • @bananasandbass
    @bananasandbass 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This does make more sense. Now you’ve got to be intentional with what you bring. Cargo haulers know they’re going to move big boxes, so you bring the big tool.
    It was always quite magical/unrealistic even within the game that the small tool could lift almost anything.

  • @emilysgame
    @emilysgame 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks Foxy - great video!

  • @KillerTyphoons
    @KillerTyphoons 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    This shows the importance of using vehicle tractor beams if applicable.

    • @asog88
      @asog88 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      100% this will be huge for ships to use Argo tractors and such too!

    • @sirbonobo3907
      @sirbonobo3907 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Than they need to implement them in a correct way First

  • @Bronwyn031
    @Bronwyn031 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Now they need to bring back ship inventories!!!
    This PTU patch has been one of the most-strangest patches in the game's history when it comes to moving BACKWARDS in game features.
    I'm glad CIG is kinda sorta listening.

    • @Billy-bc8pk
      @Billy-bc8pk 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Ship inventories shouldn't be coming back -- they were always going to be physicalised. You can only store what you can store in the storage compartments. No more invisible bags of holding.

    • @vamperic
      @vamperic 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They aren't coming back, period
      Putting them back in would be going backwards

  • @TheFrozenOne92
    @TheFrozenOne92 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Since the large tractor gun is needed for lots of stuff, cargo ships should have a weapons locker near the cargo door or at least somewhere at the cargo hold

  • @IceSki117
    @IceSki117 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I think the inventory change is a good middle ground measure for the system.

    • @netshaman9918
      @netshaman9918 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The old inventory sucked , it was a complete MESS , and now it is returned !
      You, people just suck as hell !

  • @asog88
    @asog88 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It looks pretty quick. That was my concern about them not using the drawer, but if it’s quick like this, I’m happy

    • @Billy-bc8pk
      @Billy-bc8pk 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The real issue is how it will scale in live. The main issue we have in 3.23 is that inventory database is very slow and janky at times. We will see how the kiosk performance in 3.24 handles the transition into live. CIG disabled all physics in the habs to try to compensate for the performance, but we'll see if that's enough of a bandaid until we get 4.0.

  • @SedrikGSX
    @SedrikGSX 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Actually realizing that wasn't a good implementation/idea on the storage access, saying it out loud and removing it is loable by CiG. They make a lot of mistakes, but we have to give them credit whenever they do things right too

  • @Jandl009
    @Jandl009 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I've been hoping they'd make target weight more of a factor in speed and range. It seemed too arcady before. I was hoping you'd hop into the tractor turret on that Hull C to see how that compares.

  • @nazgul9
    @nazgul9 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great info, thanks 🤘

  • @treynewton9381
    @treynewton9381 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Great testing. I wonder about multiple ppl with handhelds on a 32 SCU. Could you also find out where illegal cargo in 32 SCU boxes can be sold outside of stations? I ask because the few videos I've seen show a 100 SCU max cargo elevator with small lifts that don't look like you can fix 32 (maybe even 24) SCU boxes on.

  • @secretweapon7764
    @secretweapon7764 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I like the inventory change. Now we just need search and pre-made outfits

    • @asog88
      @asog88 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Premade outfits should be exclusively for armor/ clothing lockers.

    • @secretweapon7764
      @secretweapon7764 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@asog88 Limiting to lockers is acceptable in ships and personal property. But doesn't help at all in cities and stations. It would be ridiculous to say you can't have pre-selected clothing because you're in a city.

    • @asog88
      @asog88 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@secretweapon7764 so like lockers we can click on and it brings up presets we can select from? That sounds cool. I know our habs already have lockers in them.

    • @Billy-bc8pk
      @Billy-bc8pk 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@secretweapon7764 That would be the purpose of having lockers in your personal/persistent hab.

  • @ChookyChuck
    @ChookyChuck 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Nice video Foxy !!!!

  • @geoDunkleAura
    @geoDunkleAura 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    You have to try the nomad and Taurus tractor beams

  • @mndeg
    @mndeg 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    max lift is a beast! interesting that larger boxes means limited range now. could it be actually about the mass? can you see if the weight changes from planet to planet

  • @stonerhino83
    @stonerhino83 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This creates an interesting problem for new players that do not have access to the larger tractor beam. If they start with a cargo ship, they will have no way to load the larger boxes.

  • @dolenore
    @dolenore 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Looks like they gave the MPUV Tractor a bigger role with the handheld tractor nerf.

  • @Matthew.1994
    @Matthew.1994 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    i got myself a mule. whenever i get a mission where only small boxes are used, i use the mule to load them and park the mule into my ship. then just drive them to the elevator and unload them :D time is money

  • @everettumphrey
    @everettumphrey 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    👍 Thanks!

  • @johnokean8216
    @johnokean8216 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The Taurus ship tractor beam is so good 😊

  • @Kimi-Olisar
    @Kimi-Olisar 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Tysm Cpt.

  • @tethan
    @tethan 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great video! Any chance they made the maxlift a bit cheaper ingame?

  • @CitizenLarente
    @CitizenLarente 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks!

  • @Janaerys
    @Janaerys 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks for summarizing these changes! Really like that the item bank UI is back to a filtered local inventory view.
    One question about ship tractor beams. Are they viable in 3.24? Ie can you bring up your boxes in freight elevator, hop on ship tractor turret seat and easily get the boxes from the freight area and load on the ship without going out of the tractor turret? I trying to see what value the tractor ship turrets provide for example, in a base ironclad vs assault variant that loses the tractor beam turrets. :)

    • @gr8whiteza
      @gr8whiteza 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      That's how im currently loading in the ptu...using my C1, from pilot seat...open exterior, run outside and load cargo elevator...back to ship...co-pilot seat...mount turret and use ship tractor beam to load directly from cargo elevator in hanger into ship cargo area...back to pilot seat...close exterior...call for takeoff and away we go :)

    • @Janaerys
      @Janaerys 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @gr8whiteza oh most excellent! Thanks for confirming. The area looked a bit far from the ship especially if you end up with a very large personal hangar (due to other ships) so I was not sure it will work.

  • @WarlockSRB
    @WarlockSRB 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    ...I'll go and test if there is difference between different commodities, since not all of them are same weight

  • @Gergich257
    @Gergich257 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    great video

  • @wildcard328
    @wildcard328 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    has anyone noticed in the PTU not all the land vehicles show on the ship elevator? I'm missis my PTV, and several of my hover bikes?

  • @matiasrubinel742
    @matiasrubinel742 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Day 2 of asking if you can do a video where you try to upgrade a ship components but physically, by using the freight elevator to get the components and then proceed to place them in the ship with a tractor beam. And great vid btw, keep up the good work

    • @raptorkysen177
      @raptorkysen177 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Just tested it , it works

    • @matiasrubinel742
      @matiasrubinel742 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@raptorkysen177 Thats so cool, now, i'm never using the mobiglass to upgrade a ship! Thank you for testing!

  • @brotakul
    @brotakul 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Can you rotate the larget containers such as the 32 SCU with the max lift? I can't seem to rotate at all, it's very frustrating and I don't know whether it is a bug, an issue with my game/mouse settings or skill issue. I'd appreciate a feedback.

    • @eavdmeer
      @eavdmeer 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      He showed that you can (hold R), but it's terribly slow

  • @Patch1xo
    @Patch1xo 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I love your videos

  • @zerentheunskilled
    @zerentheunskilled 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I wonder how much being in space would change the results since you wouldn't be fighting against gravity.

  • @PinchOfLuck
    @PinchOfLuck 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Makes sense.
    That little toy gun.

  • @gkenny12
    @gkenny12 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    that is a great change

  • @Macskinny76
    @Macskinny76 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    They changed the tractor guns so that players will use the bigger one, they're be no point in having two, if one (smaller) one can do both jobs. It should've been this way when it first came out (larger) .

  • @FalconDS9
    @FalconDS9 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    still not sure if i like manual loading and now they already nerf the tractor tools to make it more complicated/time consuming... looks like cargo hauling will not be the loop of choice for most aUEC per hour, if you go for manual loading.

  • @MultiFishslayer
    @MultiFishslayer 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I always land ship with back door right up to cargo elevator!

  • @plazmaballs1024
    @plazmaballs1024 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The reactor beam movement feels way to sluggish now in my opinion

  • @sirnukealot84
    @sirnukealot84 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    With the nerf to multitool tractoring range the northrock missions with the small boxes being guarded by ninetails will get alot harder again 😆

  • @Tsudico
    @Tsudico 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    I think the handheld tractor beam changes are a good thing. It still gives a use to the multi-tool but by reducing the functionality it provides more reason to upgrade to the MaxLift when doing larger cargo runs. Most people if they aren't participating in any sort of cargo hauling won't need the MaxLift and a ship capable of hauling 32 SCU crates could keep a couple on hand for when necessary.
    The only thing I sort of wish was possible was to allow for beam assistance where you could put your beam into assistance mode and then if used in combination with other people it allows lifting heavier objects (like the 32 SCU crates). This would work similar to how multiple Prospectors can combine their beams to crack bigger mining rocks. By making it a specific mode it means the players who are assisting don't have actual control over the object being moved but provide extra power to the person who is in control.

    • @keevajazz6286
      @keevajazz6286 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      i dont think its a good change. the Multi-tool isn't starter gear or any kind of early game gear, its essential gear that you will need on every mission. nerfing it like this will simply hurt the game. instead of taking away function from the tool that's meant to function well in all fields they need too ADD features to the single function tools, like perhaps the tractor beam can temporarily hold objects in the air after you let go as an example. we have a hanger update in coming, loading cargo will be required for EVERYONE to do unless if you want to wait hours for it to be done for you. EVERYONE will now need a tractor beam, this isn't some job progression feature everyone will simply have them.

    • @Tsudico
      @Tsudico 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@keevajazz6286 The multi-tool still has plenty of use and the tractor beam attachment still is useful for most use cases. The only difference is that if you plan on hauling large or massive freight, and have a ship capable of doing so, make sure your crew has the right equipment.
      Not everyone is going to be loading or unloading the cargo in the future when the resource network gameplay comes in. There will be people who will do maintenance on the ship as the cargo is loaded or unloaded. Others might be loading supplies like food, ammo, missiles, and other things; all of which still appear to be moveable with the multi-tool.

    • @ChristoffRevan
      @ChristoffRevan 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      ​@@keevajazz6286L take, because the majority of people won't be needing to do bigger cargo...most people won't even mess with cargo apart from smaller boxes with their gear in it

    • @keevajazz6286
      @keevajazz6286 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@ChristoffRevan L take. cargo is the future of this game, it will be the life blood of the economy every single person will be partaking in it in all professions.
      your giving large cargo an unnecessary stigma, large cargo is already balanced by the size of your ship.
      again the multi tool was never a starter tool that you discard later in the game, it makes no sense for it to preform worse.

    • @adamchambers1393
      @adamchambers1393 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      ​@keevajazz6286 don't agree with this. It is still made for smaller use and is certainly relative starter gear. It is enough for most players to move basic things as needed whom aren't doing large cargo hauling where you've got 32scu etc.
      It actually gives solid reason to progress and purchase upgrades. It was always over powered for its size and requirement. They just hadn't balanced it out.
      For instance I'll never want or need tractor gun, the small handheld would do me just fine.

  • @BenJaminLongTime
    @BenJaminLongTime 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I hope they introduce some of those box carrying carts/tables/lifts for slightly more immergence when moving boxes as well as convenience. I like tractorbeams but I dont love that they are a lazer doing everything basically. looks a bit non-immersive and lame frankly. but it can be fixed by adding some more options I think and minor nerfs to it like the distance one as seen in the video. All opinions here btw I know others may disagree.

    • @asog88
      @asog88 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I’d love to have to use a cart, but they have to be careful because tractor beams are still used for space and such outside of hangers

    • @Di-Ferr
      @Di-Ferr 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      agreed. both handheld tractor beams are still very OP. hopefully the introduction of batteries/charge with resource network will nerf them enough to make carts/loading vehicles and ship-mounted beams useful.

  • @ricojoe8299
    @ricojoe8299 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    That pembrook armor where did u get the body suit for it?

  • @jasonrobinson7922
    @jasonrobinson7922 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Ya makes more since very good

  • @naril0s
    @naril0s 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I'm confused. Is it the weight or box size that determines how tractor beams work? You sometimes mention weight, sometimes box size. I dont think you even tried the same box size but with different commodities to see different weights?

  • @tfishr
    @tfishr 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    22 meters is TOO SHORT for moving loot in FPS missions. I regularly move things further than that during ship to ship transfers in space, and at bunkers, and in the outdoor areas of distribution centers. Minimum 30 meters is required. Can you test FPS items like bodies, and weapons, how far can we tractor them?

    • @eavdmeer
      @eavdmeer 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I would say half the range of the big one, so about 40m would be way more reasonable. And they really need to fix the rotations speeds. They're atrocious

    • @nuganooch1
      @nuganooch1 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      This change probably also applies to push/pulling yourself in space...

    • @bootchoo96
      @bootchoo96 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Well then take a Maxlift

  • @brianfury9790
    @brianfury9790 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    its sadly getting clear that cig are clueless on cool gameplay..
    MM is still here, so the game is still over all a failure.

    • @ChristoffRevan
      @ChristoffRevan 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Nope, that's just your opinion. The majority of people either like MM or they don't really have a strong opinion (more people are the latter, admittedly). Star Citizen was never being built as a flight/physics sim, but rather a life sim MMO in a scifi galaxy. Chris Roberts literally used those exact words as recently as the 2022 CitCon, so if you can't believe the man that's actually making the game on what it's supposed to be, I don't know what to tell you. If you don't like it, then leave

    • @brianfury9790
      @brianfury9790 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@ChristoffRevan i have left xD mm is trash, its made by noobs for noobs, enjoy your "life sim" lol

  • @sennemaa59769
    @sennemaa59769 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I dont think they learnd to listen.

  • @Crittek
    @Crittek 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Let us dress up a paper doll then when we’re done it does a short animation to put everything on.
    The move speed is honestly really painful. It’s a bit too much I think. Need more of a middle ground.

    • @Billy-bc8pk
      @Billy-bc8pk 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They are literally doing what you suggested in your first sentence. They have that feature working in SQ42. No idea when it will come to the PU, though.

  • @jinz0
    @jinz0 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    nobody use multi tool anymore, nobody uses it other functions

  • @obaniehia
    @obaniehia 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    stacking items from that menu drops them on the ground.

  • @MrSmith123123
    @MrSmith123123 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Try out the MPUV-T tractor varient now.

  • @RyokoVT
    @RyokoVT 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I've been playing 3.24 and to be honest, the only thing I've been thinking the whole time is how inconvenient everything is. Especially with the lag I was experiencing, it took me 20 minutes just to move 11 SCU worth of cargo onto my ship. Not to mention that I struggled to stock my ship with food and water like I usually do because I just.. couldn't access the inventory for it.
    I don't think these are good changes personally. Realism sometimes needs to take the back seat and let fun ride shotgun, and yes maybe some people find these new systems fun, but I can't imagine it'll remain fun the 10th time you're loading cargo. Especially with the reduced movement speeds. I *dread* doing salvage runs in a Reclaimer now.

    • @asog88
      @asog88 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      They can’t hold back features just because some servers are struggling. Outside of server issues, what’s inconvenient? That cargo isn’t fly here, click, fly there?

    • @Billy-bc8pk
      @Billy-bc8pk 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@asog88 Yeah man, I'm not understanidng people who keep suggesting to make cargo more simplified. I watched one video where someone wanted cargo to be instantaneous and automated.... like... why? Why even do cargo hauling if you don't actually want to do the cargo part? May as well just play Eurotruck Simulator in that case. The complaints about the immersive steps to make the game feel more grounded makes no sense to me -- these are all features Chris talked about a decade ago and they're now coming online. What did these people expect?

  • @barnigranero5882
    @barnigranero5882 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Can you use the tractor beam on the ship from in the hangar?

  • @Vegas-13
    @Vegas-13 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Why is the hanger so loud. How do you fix it?

    • @heru_ur6017
      @heru_ur6017 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You cant

  • @blackcobra8849
    @blackcobra8849 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Question, where did you get the ship paint job

    • @ericyang8033
      @ericyang8033 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      If you’re talking about the Hull C - it’s the Bambora livery that’s part of the “explorer’s colouration and hydration pack” from the subscribers store

  • @WildOink
    @WildOink 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I like the tracker bean changes, it was too OP before.

  • @andrewfanner2245
    @andrewfanner2245 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Ranhe cjmahe, another QoL reduction. Be nice if they gave us the reasoning.

  • @Nuttobotter
    @Nuttobotter 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    is this inteded: 32 SCU of Iron have 40 T and no handheld tractorbeam can move it. u need a ship tractor beam. if this stays and is no a bug RIP to the C2 :(

  • @Krieghandt
    @Krieghandt 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What about ship tractors?

  • @Skar38rus
    @Skar38rus 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    wtf, i think small multitool shouldn't be able to move more then 2 SCU. wanna move bigger boxes? use 2-h tractor beam, want to move very big boxes? use ship with Tractor. IMHO.

  • @eavdmeer
    @eavdmeer 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This is all fine, but can we please get a weapon rack in the cargo hold to put that giant maxlift in?

  • @ThomasD66
    @ThomasD66 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    They didn't "listen to us." The extra entity calling steps didn't reduce back end problems like they hoped so they scrapped them.

    • @eavdmeer
      @eavdmeer 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Lol, no, everyone just transferred literally *everything* to the 'drawer' nonsense they came up with, so you didn't have to go through the whole process again if you forgot something

    • @plazmaballs1024
      @plazmaballs1024 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      L take TBH

    • @diva.3641
      @diva.3641 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      they didn't listen to you

  • @rodrigogodoi4250
    @rodrigogodoi4250 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Without terminal was a six, now itz half a dozen. Wtf CIG. Shame on you.

  • @SebastiaanSwinkels
    @SebastiaanSwinkels 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I really don't like that they went back to the old UI. Yes the drawer was an extra step, but overall it was a clear step forward that a very minor group of loudmouths just couldn't live with. I really hope they don't start designing the rest of the new features by committee because hoo boy are we screwed then. Same for the payouts for hauling missions, none of that makes sense. You earn more for hauling the cargo back and forth than what the actual profit on personal run like that would net you. The old contract rewards weren't going to make you rich any time soon, but you also weren't putting any of your own money into the buying of said cargo.

    • @Billy-bc8pk
      @Billy-bc8pk 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      This guy gets it. 100% agreed on all points. Everyone complaining about hauling payouts seem to want to make megabucks doing basic hauling contracts. It's low risk, low reward gameplay. Seemed like the payouts made a lot of sense.

  • @papascronch
    @papascronch 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    hot take but i like the inventory kiosk, i notice significantly fewer inventory bugs now that we have the extra step in the middle even during wave 1. no idea what mechanism changed but if its simply forcing people to dispensers which have known locations to spawn items from or something, i'd call it a win.

  • @Funkiyy
    @Funkiyy 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Inventory system is shit

  • @asog88
    @asog88 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I feel like they bumped the reward for hauling missions up too much. Hopefully they tone it down when they don’t need players testing the cargo stuff as much

  • @borkug1566
    @borkug1566 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Kill Master Modes.

  • @Critical_Mass_
    @Critical_Mass_ 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    No more Starbucks? Good shit, we don't like moochers. Don't ever brag about disability if you are a veteran.

  • @BenitKolburn
    @BenitKolburn 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    o7

  • @Accuracy158
    @Accuracy158 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Tractor beams aren't fun CIG. Sorry... not sorry.

  • @RedDwarf1
    @RedDwarf1 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The small tractor beam is basically useless now, 'cause why have it at all when the MAX takes care of all business. Might as well not have it in the game.

    • @mdjd.8893
      @mdjd.8893 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Yeah but it takes up a full rifle sized slot, and the pyro can do other functions like healing

    • @Crittek
      @Crittek 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      One is a dedicated slot for moving shit, the other is a supplemental do it all tool that’s not as good as anything dedicated. This was much needed.

    • @ChristoffRevan
      @ChristoffRevan 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Uh, bad take...the multi tool literally is just that: a multi tool. It can do mining, healing, cutting, and tractor beaming all with easy to switch out attachments you can have in your inventory. The bigger tractor beam "rifle" literally does only one thing: tractor beaming. So no, the multi tool is not useless, it's a jack of all trades but master of none...if you want to have flexibility you have the multi tool, if you want to do cargo hauling then you use the dedicated tractor tool. Most people don't even need to carry boxes bigger than the limit for the multi tool, as most only mess with small items like armour, food, personal weapons, etc. and only need smaller boxes

    • @ericwollaston5654
      @ericwollaston5654 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Of course it still serves a purpose. It's a multitool, so the tractor beam is one of many uses of the device. Lighter crates can still be moved, and the lasso/lariat/grapple feature will be useful also - especially with suit fuel becoming an issue in the future. In addition to fitting in a backpack or on your hip. Admittedly, the rifle version will be a main tool as intended for those moving the full size 32 SCU containers.

    • @jinz0
      @jinz0 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Everyone only uses multi tool for tractor beam tho, these excuses about healing or mining, nobody uses that, they mine with a ship or roc and healing gun