For everyone wondering, this is what Bubzkji does for Astralis. He pops up in occasional videos and reminds everyone that he is still alive EDIT: device has left Astralis. Bubzkji has finally got what he deserves
OK. I'VE HAD ENOUGH!! This man isn't Tom Cruiser. How should he be? TIME MACHINE?! Mr Cruise was born long ago while this kid (his real name is Dev1ce, not TOM CRIUSE) was born only a few months ago. So you guys are all stupid, it can't be tom cruise. Suck that libtards!!!
@@norgeee lmfaoo dude chill its justa. joke lmao getting worked up for no shit reason lmao hehe we just chilling around and yall come and want to get fucked along with
THANKS BLAST! For the first time in CS content history, an organization used Humanbenchmark to test reaction times rather than some broken community map in CSGO.
@@JairajSinghPatil humanbenchmark has more latency built in. Just use a map that isnt bad like yprac and the times are good enough+less latency so youll get a more accurate result.
@@JairajSinghPatil fps cap to refresh rate by any browser. In game you don't have fps cap so it won't affect the result. Probably on 144hz+ monitors it won't change the result that much.
This gives me a lot of confidence, mine isn't as consistent yet but its as fast as these guys. About 170ms When I'm tired rn but with meditation, sleep hydration, not even practice I'm up there. Even on the aim trainer after 3 or 4 gos I'm almost there and I haven't even done focused practice yet - about 410ms, although initially i was about 460 on my first attempt so maybe 80-90ms off them but still not too far away. I really think focus, hence consistency and working memory are my current issues which can be solved with meditation alone, ignoring hydration, exercise, sleep and diet, let alone try hard shit like exact ingredients in my diet or training with specific exercises and looking up studies which I'll get to eventually but it will be quicker and easier to start with a little exercise and consistent hydration, then get to the rest.
@@ka1tIyn omg noob! I am 250ms super human reaction speed pro gaymer B) (Jokes aside, that is a very good reaction time. Not only will it help you in games but, it will help you in real life as well)
Dupreeh's actual reaction time is pretty fast considering he's able to hesitate with his fingers then click and still get ~180ms. 2 tips if you want to be more consistent with your reaction times on humanbenchmark; 1. Don't passively react, be ready, visualise yourself as if you're AWPing and waiting for a peek. 2. Don't immediately resume the test after clicking, wait a second, get ready for the next shot and then start the test.
hey, dupreeh is the OG astralis player, so he earns the most respect from me. i guess device has been there since the TSM days too, but dupreeh is older, and boomers are better. why i like f0rest.
You guys dont realise how extremely fast 160-140 ms reaction time is. Pair that with the monitors time to display the image, computer processing, website speed, mouse click latency. That all adds latency. So you could be looking at 130ms reaction time when it says 150. And even their age, wow. Im 18 and get 180-200. Ive been playing cs for 5 years. Edit: I got a 240hz monitor and razer viper.
What i noticed is that it really depends on the hardware. I tried that test with my 144hz monitor set to 60hz and got 260ms, when i set it to 144hz i got 190ms. Tested this multiple times to verify its actually caused by the refreshrate... 144hz makes such a difference and these guys are prob on 240 or 360hz....
@@hugohabicht6274 Yeah I've noticed this as well. On 144hz Im at around 170-180. 60hz I can't get under 200. I wonder how much my score would improve on 240hz
The reaction time is genetic, there is no way to improve it. The visual reaction time is higher than the audio reaction time. This is why it is important to play with the sound
Astralis management: ok, we are paying bubzjki big salary but hes om the bench and not playing, what should we do? The team: he can appear in a promo video, we will make him look good so he will be happy and people believe he will play one day
Anything bellow 200ms in Human Benchmark is good enough to go pro. CS isn't just clicking unless you are holding an angle with an awp and even then you have to adjust a bit usually. Reaction time in CS is complex with added time for flicks and predicting enemy movement which all together happens in 200-350ms not 150 like we see in this vid. Time to kill = reaction time + flick time. Crosshair placement and mechanical skill can greatly impact flick time.
In csgo I use awp mainly and just peek small corners, after a lil warm up I get 140ms in benchmark 75hz monitor and just play with apple and aim at small gaps (not too small)
Your wrong, it would still be 150 ms in gameifyour aiming with an awp scope, because its just like benchmark, the flick doesn't matter because if you flick a little bit it's just natural, meaning it is the same reaction time as if the mouse does not move. Unless you flick a whole lot (outside the scope area) then it counts
i got reaction time *220ms* and aim trainer *395ms* per target and *47wpm* So I'm garbage at everything. Edit: I tried clicks per second now and I got 12.8 cps... Maybe I'm not that garbage actually...
@@peterenis3507 the Hz doesn't give a big advantage when it's above 144Hz. Also the most important thing is the monitor and mouse delay and input lag. For example my monitors delay is the standard 1ms, but some monitors might have 5ms.
Don't worry, the humanbenchmark Aim trainer is not a good indicator of anything, 2D aiming is different from 3D aiming, and it doesn't have an in-game sensitivity modifier. Just alter your DPI as if you're trying to find a good sensitivity in CS:GO and you'll do better. Also, 60Hz monitors have pretty bad input lag, it's almost 17ms just by virtue of being a 60Hz monitor, it goes up to 25-40+ms depending on how good the pixel response times are (also don't use laptops or touchscreens for the test,)
@Matias Colombres Argibay There's no truth to what you just said. Try doing that test with 400DPI and then try it again with 1600DPI. Even people used to playing with 2000+eDPI will struggle to be accurate using 1600DPI on a 2D surface.
Hardware makes such a huge difference with this test. With a gaming mouse and monitor I can average around 150 ms, using a generic monitor and junk mouse it's like 210 average
seriously? I use two monitors with the same computer, one with 60hz and the other is 144hz, but test results are quite the same, around 170~190ms, i swear. I think the most significant hardware is computer(CPU, GPU), not monitor or what
slower reaction time than i thought. im an old man and i can average in the mid 120ms mark. goes to show that reaction time isnt the end all be all to CSGO, your ability to track, and follow up shots and all around accuracy is more important IMO. tactics play a huge roll as well.
@@firstname4114 not all matches, they would swap a player for 1 match against some team and take bubzkji and in some matches keep bubzkji on bench . Vitality and navi would do the same with b1t and nivera because of rules 🙄. You can't change roster between 1 match 👍👍😁
Your ping and ping stability to the website and refresh rate to the monitor could very well influence your results, Most CSGO gamers have 60hz monitors, Sub par Frame rates and connections. Where as pros are playing on 240hz some on 360hz and with The best of the best PC's and Unrelenting Connections.
my reaction time is about 200 ms, and that either shows how much difference 50 ms makes or how much reaction time doesn't matter in competitive shooters
True when it comes to clicking latency. However, if you have delayed mouse input in terms of movement it is very noticeable, especially with a larger delay.
@@acebandge5293 Facts. On terms of reaction time and stuff yeah it's irrelevant, but you expect your movements with your hand to be instantly reflected in game by the mouse, and when they aren't it becomes very noticeable while moving and aiming.
It has way more to do about the refresh rate of your monitor. With a 60hz monitor it takes 4x as long to see the first frame green than it does with a 240hz one
I got like 60ms on a preclick once, around 150-170 is my avarage tho. I think more pros should do these tests, they are entertaining as f. Good job Astralis!
I pretty much destroyed them at the aim trainer (after 5 runs I got a 314ms) and matched them in reaction time (149ms) but I still know they could all crush me without even trying.
My average peaks at 220 ms but I feel like I was doing it just as fast as these guys were, it could be some delay of the devices (i used a laptop and an office mouse)
Their reaction time is insane, holy.... I got a reaction time of 180-200ms Aiming first attempt was 355ms, but its 2D aiming so its irrelevant Typing I get 90-100 WPM, which I’d say is pretty decent
I know this comment was made 8 months ago but 2d is not irrelevant at all when training for 3d. It's the same movements with the mouse ingame. 2d aimtraining focuses purely on mouse control which is the basis of aim
Refresh rate helps an enormous amount. from 60hz to 144hz, my avg reaction time moves from 170ms down to to 155ms. I'm guessing 240 will put it to 145 or something.
@@tappajaav Well to be fair, I don't think there's a diminishing return. I might be wrong though. Diminishing would make sense if you mean input delay wasn't reducing with proportion to the refresh rate, which it would be. If you mean the difference a person would feel between 86.2 fps and 144 fps in terms of smoothness and then between 144 and 240, yeah it would seem diminishing. But I don't see any reason for the input delay to not be lessened in the exact same ratio. Also I do get that it'll not decrease by 15 ms once more, but "you'll get 5 ms if you're lucky" seems an understatement.
@@wildfire7766 The returns are diminishing in a sense that the benefits given by faster refresh rate monitors are smaller and smaller higher refresh rate you go. Changing your 144hz monitor refresh rate to 60 and 30 respectively and then testing something like reaction times is great example. Lower you go larger the differences will be.
The typing part is extremely useful for matchmaking, when u need to insult your whole team under 10 seconds.
Lool
Hahahahahhaha
Underrated Comment
Underrated comment, they better pin this
I love u
For everyone wondering, this is what Bubzkji does for Astralis. He pops up in occasional videos and reminds everyone that he is still alive
EDIT: device has left Astralis. Bubzkji has finally got what he deserves
He looks dead inside lmao
@@Jaded21121 He is probably wondering why is he told to practice cobblestone
Hey he is also told to practice Office along with it.
@@yashhirani2534 Big brain play from Zonic, Bubzkji chimes in when GabeN adds these two maps to the competitive play again
does bubzkji only play nuke during tournaments?
Astralis: *playing Reaction training*
Bubzkji: *My time is now*
He has to sell something since they don't let him play anymore
@@fgp0032 Well...
@@Abgehoben4U He sold something... I didn't think it would be dev1ce though
This comemnt didnt age well
Bubzkji: 145ms
Dupreeh: OH PHUHA YOUNG GUN
Magisk: "Smashing the button"
*Young Gun
buba young gun*
Thanks for telling me what they said. I forgot to watch the video
He is so underated
Booba
Never thought I'd see Bubzkji's face again
Locked in a dungeon XD
th-cam.com/video/1b8K8ymP9Yw/w-d-xo.html
Well well...
Slavery :(
2:00 Just like his mathces, device with that one insane flick along with other normal awp frags.
Blast Will have Best production for ever. Even if theres no tournament in the moment they still upload funny content
Blast shorts are more watchable than any esl and iem tournament
@@akcolade yeah they are more watchable but still esl/iem are more memorable than any blast event
m.th-cam.com/video/6jKoqjI0iTU/w-d-xo.html
"He get good spawn, it is easy" 🤣
this Tom Cruise guy is really chaotic
Legend he is just like this cool looking guy NIKO
OK. I'VE HAD ENOUGH!! This man isn't Tom Cruiser. How should he be? TIME MACHINE?! Mr Cruise was born long ago while this kid (his real name is Dev1ce, not TOM CRIUSE) was born only a few months ago. So you guys are all stupid, it can't be tom cruise. Suck that libtards!!!
@@norgeee lmfaoo dude chill its justa. joke lmao getting worked up for no shit reason lmao hehe we just chilling around and yall come and want to get fucked along with
@@AzanZ he is jokin too m8
@@AzanZ you just got r/wooosh whiile trying to r/wooosh
Honestly i don't think the reaction speed matters too much.. dupreeh had the worst reaction speed and he is still the best entry fragger in the world.
Ofc it matters. Look at xantares
It matters but that's not the most important thing
@@stahol7877 Xantares is nowhere near dupreeh's level though to be fair xD
He’s an extremely good entry but not the best in the world
@@stahol7877 Xantares isnt even in top 20 players
THANKS BLAST! For the first time in CS content history, an organization used Humanbenchmark to test reaction times rather than some broken community map in CSGO.
Yeah it's not that hard just use humanbenchmark
@@JairajSinghPatil humanbenchmark has more latency built in. Just use a map that isnt bad like yprac and the times are good enough+less latency so youll get a more accurate result.
@@jamalyogugaratee9170 really? Any source for that?
@@jamalyogugaratee9170 just use aim lab lmao that is what really matters
@@JairajSinghPatil fps cap to refresh rate by any browser. In game you don't have fps cap so it won't affect the result. Probably on 144hz+ monitors it won't change the result that much.
They should do this with team liquid. I've heard that elige literally had world records on aim lab
really? man i really need to see that world records
@@mtzrules just look up elige aimlab. Its actually insane, its at least 10x more insane. No wonder he is probably the best rifler in the world.
Great content, blast is in the house with this videos lately, love to see how teams are inside
This gives me a lot of confidence, mine isn't as consistent yet but its as fast as these guys. About 170ms When I'm tired rn but with meditation, sleep hydration, not even practice I'm up there.
Even on the aim trainer after 3 or 4 gos I'm almost there and I haven't even done focused practice yet - about 410ms, although initially i was about 460 on my first attempt so maybe 80-90ms off them but still not too far away.
I really think focus, hence consistency and working memory are my current issues which can be solved with meditation alone, ignoring hydration, exercise, sleep and diet, let alone try hard shit like exact ingredients in my diet or training with specific exercises and looking up studies which I'll get to eventually but it will be quicker and easier to start with a little exercise and consistent hydration, then get to the rest.
Bruh im at 190 🫡
No chance at becoming pro
It used to be 170s-190
Now 190-200 ever since I stopped playing video games
Meanwhile me with 300ms and absolutely no skill whatsoever: „bro dupreeh is so slow“
Im 250ms pro gaymer
@@walaba7038 im 190 but im super young sp
@@ka1tIyn omg noob! I am 250ms super human reaction speed pro gaymer B)
(Jokes aside, that is a very good reaction time. Not only will it help you in games but, it will help you in real life as well)
@@ka1tIyn im 23 and im at below 155 when in the zone, 160-170 on average. My reactions actually saved me from a car crash lol
300ms? That's too slow, even for old people.
It has to be your pc being slow or you had some concussion in the past.
Dupreeh's actual reaction time is pretty fast considering he's able to hesitate with his fingers then click and still get ~180ms. 2 tips if you want to be more consistent with your reaction times on humanbenchmark; 1. Don't passively react, be ready, visualise yourself as if you're AWPing and waiting for a peek. 2. Don't immediately resume the test after clicking, wait a second, get ready for the next shot and then start the test.
Dupreeh relatable
old man
hey, dupreeh is the OG astralis player, so he earns the most respect from me. i guess device has been there since the TSM days too, but dupreeh is older, and boomers are better. why i like f0rest.
Boomers > all
You guys dont realise how extremely fast 160-140 ms reaction time is. Pair that with the monitors time to display the image, computer processing, website speed, mouse click latency. That all adds latency. So you could be looking at 130ms reaction time when it says 150. And even their age, wow. Im 18 and get 180-200. Ive been playing cs for 5 years.
Edit: I got a 240hz monitor and razer viper.
What i noticed is that it really depends on the hardware. I tried that test with my 144hz monitor set to 60hz and got 260ms, when i set it to 144hz i got 190ms. Tested this multiple times to verify its actually caused by the refreshrate... 144hz makes such a difference and these guys are prob on 240 or 360hz....
@@hugohabicht6274 I was actually thinking about this myself when I just tried it just now and got 220. (im a 60hz pleb) :(
@@hugohabicht6274 Yeah I've noticed this as well. On 144hz Im at around 170-180. 60hz I can't get under 200. I wonder how much my score would improve on 240hz
The reaction time is genetic, there is no way to improve it. The visual reaction time is higher than the audio reaction time. This is why it is important to play with the sound
i got 61 ms
Astralis management: ok, we are paying bubzjki big salary but hes om the bench and not playing, what should we do?
The team: he can appear in a promo video, we will make him look good so he will be happy and people believe he will play one day
Anything bellow 200ms in Human Benchmark is good enough to go pro. CS isn't just clicking unless you are holding an angle with an awp and even then you have to adjust a bit usually. Reaction time in CS is complex with added time for flicks and predicting enemy movement which all together happens in 200-350ms not 150 like we see in this vid.
Time to kill = reaction time + flick time. Crosshair placement and mechanical skill can greatly impact flick time.
In csgo I use awp mainly and just peek small corners, after a lil warm up I get 140ms in benchmark 75hz monitor and just play with apple and aim at small gaps (not too small)
Your wrong, it would still be 150 ms in gameifyour aiming with an awp scope, because its just like benchmark, the flick doesn't matter because if you flick a little bit it's just natural, meaning it is the same reaction time as if the mouse does not move. Unless you flick a whole lot (outside the scope area) then it counts
Magisk: "Bubzkji got briller"
On danish "briller" means glasses XD
The Typing Part Is Useful When U Finish A Game Just To Answer In The Last 3 Sec The Guy Who Said "Eze"
i got reaction time *220ms*
and aim trainer *395ms* per target
and *47wpm*
So I'm garbage at everything.
Edit: I tried clicks per second now and I got 12.8 cps... Maybe I'm not that garbage actually...
it‘s the monitor too i had like 200 on my 60 fps one and 175 on the 144 one
and they use a 240 or even 350 one so it‘s not really fair
@@peterenis3507 the Hz doesn't give a big advantage when it's above 144Hz.
Also the most important thing is the monitor and mouse delay and input lag.
For example my monitors delay is the standard 1ms, but some monitors might have 5ms.
Cps 6
Don't worry, the humanbenchmark Aim trainer is not a good indicator of anything, 2D aiming is different from 3D aiming, and it doesn't have an in-game sensitivity modifier. Just alter your DPI as if you're trying to find a good sensitivity in CS:GO and you'll do better. Also, 60Hz monitors have pretty bad input lag, it's almost 17ms just by virtue of being a 60Hz monitor, it goes up to 25-40+ms depending on how good the pixel response times are (also don't use laptops or touchscreens for the test,)
@Matias Colombres Argibay There's no truth to what you just said. Try doing that test with 400DPI and then try it again with 1600DPI. Even people used to playing with 2000+eDPI will struggle to be accurate using 1600DPI on a 2D surface.
Device filling those sleeves 🥵
device rockin the hell out of that fresh cut
Fax
Hardware makes such a huge difference with this test. With a gaming mouse and monitor I can average around 150 ms, using a generic monitor and junk mouse it's like 210 average
seriously?
I use two monitors with the same computer, one with 60hz and the other is 144hz, but test results are quite the same, around 170~190ms, i swear. I think the most significant hardware is computer(CPU, GPU), not monitor or what
btw, I also use my laptop to test, i get 210~240ms, very slow
Loved these tests, for sure trying asap :)
2:00 that was prefire bro ...
booba play games
booba no play official :(
Bubber* But ahah true!
Buba
BOOBA
slower reaction time than i thought. im an old man and i can average in the mid 120ms mark. goes to show that reaction time isnt the end all be all to CSGO, your ability to track, and follow up shots and all around accuracy is more important IMO. tactics play a huge roll as well.
cap
120 is even better than formula 1 who are you lying to
O shit, bubzkji stood up from the bench to make a video, nice
5:10 dupreeh trrrr just got me
Ngl blast has the best content imo
1:36 that dab tf hahhaha
he hasn't left the hq since joining aatralis they just keep him caged in a pitch black room
Guys don't worry , bubzkji would play in esl Pro league and all maps not only nuke ❤️🔥
is it? who will gonna be rested?
Other maps :
Mirage , cobble and cache xD
@@firstname4114 not all matches, they would swap a player for 1 match against some team and take bubzkji and in some matches keep bubzkji on bench . Vitality and navi would do the same with b1t and nivera because of rules 🙄. You can't change roster between 1 match 👍👍😁
@@whyme13 😂😂😂 let's hope not 😂
@@whyme13 maybe Blast kz/surf map if he gets lucky
I got 165ms as 29 years old, good enough.
Your ping and ping stability to the website and refresh rate to the monitor could very well influence your results, Most CSGO gamers have 60hz monitors, Sub par Frame rates and connections. Where as pros are playing on 240hz some on 360hz and with The best of the best PC's and Unrelenting Connections.
1:36 why he gotta do that
my reaction time is about 200 ms, and that either shows how much difference 50 ms makes or how much reaction time doesn't matter in competitive shooters
it doesn't matter
when you get a mouse that has 1ms responstime, and then see this it doesn't really matter if if its 5 or 1ms
True when it comes to clicking latency. However, if you have delayed mouse input in terms of movement it is very noticeable, especially with a larger delay.
@@acebandge5293 Facts. On terms of reaction time and stuff yeah it's irrelevant, but you expect your movements with your hand to be instantly reflected in game by the mouse, and when they aren't it becomes very noticeable while moving and aiming.
@@f4yg020 this dude spittin 💯
It has way more to do about the refresh rate of your monitor. With a 60hz monitor it takes 4x as long to see the first frame green than it does with a 240hz one
@@manfromwuhan714 True. Reaction time on 60hz setting on my monitor was 260, it was 180 on 240hz.
My reaction time is 336ms after waking up to 8 hours of sleep
Dupreeh and bubzki's friendship is so cutr
I was whole heartedly waiting for device lmao
Would love to see ropz doin it. His reactions are insane!
name song 2:00 ????
Im glad they did this cause this makes me feel better cause i dont have 100% accuracy cause even pros miss
_cries in stable 252 ms reaction time_
I think the ability of prediction is overall more useful than reaction time, its probably why Dupreeh's still at the top amongst the entry fraggers
I have better reaction time than dupreeh and I suck at game
Did anyone noticed that Dupreeh looks kinda like Martin Freeman (the Hobbit Bilbo)
He looks more like Jason Bateman
Dupreeh looks like a British general you’d see in ww2 movies
"Old man, slow man" meanwhile i have a 300ms reaction time
The beat drop was good 1:58
no one laughed to "pre-click" :(
@@TheGrymstone yeh...
I got like 60ms on a preclick once, around 150-170 is my avarage tho. I think more pros should do these tests, they are entertaining as f. Good job Astralis!
Now we got bubzkji and he got briller Nice
It's even better when you understand everything they are saying
That moment when he flicked the mouse after click😁😁
5:05 duppreeh is scratching eggs
I hear the reference to Bowie and Mercury’s song called under pressure)
gosh miss this Astralis
I pretty much destroyed them at the aim trainer (after 5 runs I got a 314ms) and matched them in reaction time (149ms) but I still know they could all crush me without even trying.
Every reaction time video has to have the classic comments: "I GoT 15ms WitHouT pReclICking" after getting the pre-click warning 500 times
My fastest is 24 ms with a overall of 133 ms on 5 clicks... I did hit 2 ms once but that was pure luck i guess 😂
pov: you tried it and you were nowhere near where they are
Whats the name of the mouse?
Device has literally prefired the reaction button at 2:01 .
My average peaks at 220 ms but I feel like I was doing it just as fast as these guys were, it could be some delay of the devices (i used a laptop and an office mouse)
Check how much Hz is your laptop. If its under 60 then its understandable why ur average is 220
Wheres time is but a window when you need him?
"for you who might not know me I'm a 1.6 pro and I'm known for my midpicks on mirage blablabla reaction time"
@@benem807 mid picks on mirage?
Mid picks on de dust2😂
Who knew Tom Cruise could click so fast
They keep referring to Bubzkji as the young gun but he's the same age as Magisk!
i got 13 ms on the reaction test by accident lmfao my average is more like dupreeh
50% Good PC
30%Good Mouse
20% Pure Human Reaction
Don't forget internet speed
and 100% reason to remember the name
Imagine doing this test with Xantares ...
Dude I want device's hair. NO CAP
My reaction time is so slow that i had to rewind to see that it was 84wpm
once got this at 0ms. use the force luke!
Alright I am here after Dev1ce is in NIP
For some reason I feel like have a better reaction time when I’m moving my curser around screen
what model of this mouse computer ??
i feel like doing these tests in-game would yield a better result
Bubzkji is the new Astralis typing game player
Link of this training?
Dude I was play cs and I met an awp user with an average of 113 ms, I couldn’t even see him before I died
what refresh rate was the monitor?
took me like a month of continues practice to get 375 at aim test :D now i have little respect for pros that they got that number on first try.
Especially considering this isn't their in game sensitivity.
@@flowscs6835 i have different excuse too, i used non gaming 10 dollar mouse
@@Bensway7 I might try the reaction test and aiming test with my G903 and see how I do.
magisk concentration face legit looks like robot
Imagine if it showed that they had 545ms reaction time
What refresh rate? There like a 50ms difference between 60hz and144hz for me.
2:00 omg device
Their reaction time is nearly twice as fast as mine 😳
U on 60hz
it’s irrelevant with 60hz, i swear.
@@sA-cn8ce incorrect
@@juanchol21
I use two monitor to test, one with 60Hz and the other 144Hz, the difference is not significant.
I can get 15X~200ms reaction time for both monitor
Them:Mad when they get 150 ms
Me: Proud with my 300 ms
yes bro, my record is 190 (its absolutely hard for me)
Ye its pretty hard
Now its bubzkji and he got briller (glasses) so..... Nice one magisk
Their reaction time is insane, holy....
I got a reaction time of 180-200ms
Aiming first attempt was 355ms, but its 2D aiming so its irrelevant
Typing I get 90-100 WPM, which I’d say is pretty decent
I know this comment was made 8 months ago but 2d is not irrelevant at all when training for 3d. It's the same movements with the mouse ingame. 2d aimtraining focuses purely on mouse control which is the basis of aim
Where i can Find that site ?
i have the same scores as the first one except my monitor is 75hz and theirs at least 144 thats crazy
now its bubzkji and he got briller. nice magisk
They're here being upset after getting more than 150, while I'm sitting at 220 and being satisfied when luckily hitting under 200.
Refresh rate helps an enormous amount. from 60hz to 144hz, my avg reaction time moves from 170ms down to to 155ms. I'm guessing 240 will put it to 145 or something.
@@wildfire7766 Would be lucky to see 5 ms improvement with diminishing returns that come with higher refresh rates.
@@tappajaav Well to be fair, I don't think there's a diminishing return. I might be wrong though. Diminishing would make sense if you mean input delay wasn't reducing with proportion to the refresh rate, which it would be. If you mean the difference a person would feel between 86.2 fps and 144 fps in terms of smoothness and then between 144 and 240, yeah it would seem diminishing. But I don't see any reason for the input delay to not be lessened in the exact same ratio. Also I do get that it'll not decrease by 15 ms once more, but "you'll get 5 ms if you're lucky" seems an understatement.
@@tappajaav My friend's soon to buy a 240 hz. When it happens I'll make sure to try at his place and see how it goes.
@@wildfire7766 The returns are diminishing in a sense that the benefits given by faster refresh rate monitors are smaller and smaller higher refresh rate you go.
Changing your 144hz monitor refresh rate to 60 and 30 respectively and then testing something like reaction times is great example. Lower you go larger the differences will be.
Compared to humans, Dogs have an average reaction time of 100ms...... what the actual F
Usain Bolt has a reaction time of 155ms which even more insane.
But in cs we have way better reactions since we are way more focused.
My reaction times are as good as astralis.
Won't talk about the rest of my ability though, we can ignore that
Is this the real color bubzkji’s eyes??? Like the Atlantic ocean blue
Cool to see Tom Cruise with these CS Pros