Cybersecurity Architecture based on a Defense-in-Depth Design.

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 22 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 35

  • @sfhussain8
    @sfhussain8 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Can't appreciate enough. It's a very straight & lucid explanation. Lovely it is Mr.Mark. Thank you :)

  • @lisatorres2234
    @lisatorres2234 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Very insightful thank you! I learned something new!!

  • @ayekula
    @ayekula 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thanks a lot for sharing great information about CyberSecurity Arch and looking forward to see more videos like this.....

  • @tauqeerahmed394
    @tauqeerahmed394 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Excellent, dont have other words to aporeciate.

  • @serheangtan6195
    @serheangtan6195 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you very much! The information provided is easy to follow, and it definitely helped to understand and continue growing with my Cyber Security Journey

  • @treeorwh2
    @treeorwh2 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I couldn’t stop staring at the confidential classification at the bottom of the slide… And now its on TH-cam. See layer 8… Otherwise, really great overview, thank you very much!

    • @Cyber_security_COE
      @Cyber_security_COE  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Confidential to me and the people I share it with and my subscribers can share the links freely. My materials are not for downloading copying and redistribution under another name which is why the confidential label has been applied.

  • @VECTRESS7
    @VECTRESS7 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Great summary! Very helpful!

  • @patrickwangondu2652
    @patrickwangondu2652 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Brief and to the point... very informative. It's my career aspiration to be a Cybersecurity Architect. Looking forward for more.

  • @stealmysunshine
    @stealmysunshine ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thank you. It's hard to find concisely worded clips on this

  • @marianam1315
    @marianam1315 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thank you very much, this is very helpful and gave a very good overview of the subject. 🙏

  • @omerkhan2970
    @omerkhan2970 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Very well put together, Thankyou.

  • @elginkyei-baffour6003
    @elginkyei-baffour6003 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Good content !

  • @heatherlim3277
    @heatherlim3277 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Thanks for the session!!:) really helpful. Are all layers equally critical? If you had to pick a few layers, which would be key in this current environment?

    • @Cyber_security_COE
      @Cyber_security_COE  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      This example is to demonstrate the use of defense in depth. More layers mean more resilience against external threats. You could have fewer layers but the level of protection will be limited. The level of protection should be based on a risk assessment of the assets.

    • @abdelatifbouroucha8253
      @abdelatifbouroucha8253 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Cyber_security_COE hello sir,
      I have a these to do this year about defense in depth could you please help me with some documentation
      Thanks

  • @watisonik
    @watisonik 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thank you Mark for this video, I found it very informative and sussinctly exemplified.
    I wanted to ask, are these 10 layers based off a certain industry framework or standard?
    Some of the layers I've seen with some security vendors, but would love to know it's root of reference so I can use it in my conversations. Thank you.

    • @mbernard9456
      @mbernard9456 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Hello, The defense-in-depth is based on technology deployment, and its purpose establishing 10 layers of defense.

    • @watisonik
      @watisonik 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @mbernard9456 thank you for clarifying that.

  • @rajasekharsambasiva
    @rajasekharsambasiva 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Great overview . Thanks

  • @allsmiles3281
    @allsmiles3281 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thank you.

  • @GPS379
    @GPS379 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    really beautiful 😇

  • @darkhacker7127
    @darkhacker7127 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    thank you sir

  • @mohamedconde3223
    @mohamedconde3223 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Fine!

  • @daikennett
    @daikennett 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Appreciate the video sir, but at 5:39 its Domain Name System and not Domain Network Services :)

    • @daikennett
      @daikennett 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Also straight after that its Virtual LAN not Virtual Logical network :) (don't mean to criticize and thanks for the vids!)

    • @daikennett
      @daikennett 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Just watched further and you clear it up! Nice thanks!