I was hesitant at first - but looking back on what Claude AI is able to output...I'm impressed! I like it a lot. Let me know what you think in the comments.
Try this prompt Jesse. I get 1500-3000 words from it normally. If you want to include the LSI's then modify the prompt to ask it to include the LSI keywords. Write a comprehensive blog post of 4000 words on the topic """xxx.""" Write with proper markdown. You target audience is xxx. Place a list of key takeaways after the introduction. Cite references where applicable. Include a descriptive title based on the topic keywords
Thanks! Your videos rock - keep them coming - hopefully people who are subscribed to you will after this video! Your comparison chart on the different models is great.
Jesse, nice video as always, You should use this tool in other way. If i' wer eyou, i'd pick any question from Answer socrates related to your niche, then pick the 3 main pages on top Google research, then copy all of those 3 articles and paste it on a word doc, transform it into pdf files, then attach those 3 files. then i'd write down this prompt: "Extract LSI keywords from Article 1, Article 2 and article 3 for the seed keywor of (question selected from answer socrates)", then it will appear all the keywords from those 3 articles. Then, i'd write down the following prompt "based on article 1, article 2, and article 3 generate an outline for the above seed keyword with the use of LSI keywords, use roman letters and no more than 10.". then iyou can use Word Galaxy to create a good article. or you can just following using claude ai with this prompt "use markdown formating to write 100 words of section I. Use Bolded words, include lists and table where relevant. Try use as many of the LSI keywords from the LSI keywords list as you possible."
Agrrrr cats out of the bag 😅...Claude is certainly impressive AND I see higher indexing rates w this tool than other free ones ...best secret tool so far ...well not so secret now lol 😎👍
I've been using Claude a fair bit this week, it is indeed very good, I'm very impressed. Still a lot of wildly inaccurate stuff generated as per ChatGPT, so that is something, as ever, that people will have to monitor, but aside from that it is very good and much easier at putting longer form articles together than CPGT3.5 at least, which also go a long way to passing AI detection tests on first pass, a few minor tweaks and it seems to pass with flying colours. I have read a report of some outright plagiarism being detected with Claude though, but so far it's been fine for me.
I was dubious at first. AS a big GPT fan, I tried Claude last week.... yeah.. I gotta admit. I'm all in now. I've been using Claude for most projects now. Much more fluid and less canned or AI sounding answers.
Hello there, I hope this message finds you well. I am currently in the process of learning the art of content writing and I am very interested in gaining practical experience in the field. Would it be possible for you to consider allowing me to join you as a trainee? Your guidance and mentorship would be greatly appreciated. Thank you for your time and consideration. Best regards, Muhammad Akram, Pakistan
I've found GPT-4 to be superior from a purely SEO standpoint. Consistently beats Claude in Neuron Writer. However, I find Claude to be better on readability.
I was hesitant at first - but looking back on what Claude AI is able to output...I'm impressed! I like it a lot. Let me know what you think in the comments.
Try this prompt Jesse. I get 1500-3000 words from it normally. If you want to include the LSI's then modify the prompt to ask it to include the LSI keywords.
Write a comprehensive blog post of 4000 words on the topic """xxx.""" Write with proper markdown. You target audience is xxx. Place a list of key takeaways after the introduction. Cite references where applicable. Include a descriptive title based on the topic keywords
Thanks for the shoutout! Great channel and great content! Watch your videos all the time ;)
Thanks! Your videos rock - keep them coming - hopefully people who are subscribed to you will after this video! Your comparison chart on the different models is great.
@@jessecunninghamv Thank you! Likewise! Let me know if you'll ever want to do a collab 😀
Props for mentioning a smaller channel like Words At Scale. That was a dope gesture on ur behalf. Great way to set an example.
Jesse, nice video as always, You should use this tool in other way. If i' wer eyou, i'd pick any question from Answer socrates related to your niche, then pick the 3 main pages on top Google research, then copy all of those 3 articles and paste it on a word doc, transform it into pdf files, then attach those 3 files. then i'd write down this prompt: "Extract LSI keywords from Article 1, Article 2 and article 3 for the seed keywor of (question selected from answer socrates)", then it will appear all the keywords from those 3 articles. Then, i'd write down the following prompt "based on article 1, article 2, and article 3 generate an outline for the above seed keyword with the use of LSI keywords, use roman letters and no more than 10.". then iyou can use Word Galaxy to create a good article. or you can just following using claude ai with this prompt "use markdown formating to write 100 words of section I. Use Bolded words, include lists and table where relevant. Try use as many of the LSI keywords from the LSI keywords list as you possible."
Claude is the best option when it comes to writing conversational content.
I love the formatting of Claude from what I just saw. I spend a lot of time reformatting. And Claude will be my next go to for some quick short bulk
Awesome video as always. Thanks for introducing me to Claude. I hadn't heard of that one before.
Another great video, Jesse! I love the clarity of thought in all of your videos.
Agrrrr cats out of the bag 😅...Claude is certainly impressive AND I see higher indexing rates w this tool than other free ones ...best secret tool so far ...well not so secret now lol 😎👍
Secret is out !!! Yeah - it is super good. I'm impressed.
I've been using Claude a fair bit this week, it is indeed very good, I'm very impressed. Still a lot of wildly inaccurate stuff generated as per ChatGPT, so that is something, as ever, that people will have to monitor, but aside from that it is very good and much easier at putting longer form articles together than CPGT3.5 at least, which also go a long way to passing AI detection tests on first pass, a few minor tweaks and it seems to pass with flying colours. I have read a report of some outright plagiarism being detected with Claude though, but so far it's been fine for me.
Love the video, as well as video about backlinks. I would like to see another video about backlinks is there something similair to HARO?
Check out the video I have in the description - it is a different one (not HARO).
I was dubious at first. AS a big GPT fan, I tried Claude last week.... yeah.. I gotta admit. I'm all in now. I've been using Claude for most projects now. Much more fluid and less canned or AI sounding answers.
Hello there,
I hope this message finds you well. I am currently in the process of learning the art of content writing and I am very interested in gaining practical experience in the field. Would it be possible for you to consider allowing me to join you as a trainee? Your guidance and mentorship would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you for your time and consideration.
Best regards,
Muhammad Akram, Pakistan
So far, I have only been using Claude 2 to generate outlines. Does quite a good job on that.
Haven't used it for anything else... yet.
Hope to see bulk in word galaxy, it will be helpful
I've found GPT-4 to be superior from a purely SEO standpoint. Consistently beats Claude in Neuron Writer. However, I find Claude to be better on readability.
Test have been run showing that Claude 2 performs below ChatGPT 3.5 and 4 on several use cases but seems to do well when writing articles.
Not sure what benefit there is in using Claude of Chat GPT 4. Can someone explain?
can somebody recomend me tool like this and chatgpt4 for site audit?
I haven't found a good site audit tool based on LLMs - they do corpus text easier, like a big body of text
is Claude better then Koala Writer. Has anybody compared these 2?
Claude can't access internet. It is no good than ChatGPT. I don't know from where the hype is coming in..