The phase sequence in the dbc frame doesn't match the drawing. Note that in your I versus time graph the Ib reaches its peak first than Ic but in the red phasor drawing the Ic comes first than Ib
@@shreyasshetty2815 apparently it's a power invariance principle and it helps to balance out the coefficients, especially for the zero current and the inverse operation
Really super. Keep it up. Good luck. Don't loose passion. Thank you sir
Nice sir my vector control concept get cleared
God bless you, man. 🙌🏽
good explanation but how did you common out 1/3 under root in I beta ?
nice detail matrix conversation step by step
Thank you for the explanation
Kya bataya bhai, bahut acha
very good for understanding point of view.
The phase sequence in the dbc frame doesn't match the drawing. Note that in your I versus time graph the Ib reaches its peak first than Ic but in the red phasor drawing the Ic comes first than Ib
you save my time....thnku
described perfectly , thank you much
do you understand why & how 2/3 factor is taken?
Why & how you took 2/3 factor for I_alpha at starting ?
same qn
It's done earlier immediately after substituting the values of the Cos function, just before the simplification step.
@@reubendias18 but why 2/3 itself?
It started from Clarke transform
Is it because we are taking 2/3rd of current????
@@shreyasshetty2815 apparently it's a power invariance principle and it helps to balance out the coefficients, especially for the zero current and the inverse operation
@@reubendias18 ohk
Thanks man 😊
thankyou very much