When I even leave just a 1/1 dude alive, I can be sure that the Pally will buff it AND clear the board with their dumb 4 mana buff spell. It felt extremely ballsy that Chump didnt kill the Giant, especially when he already was winning big on board 😂
The opponent did an order in the court. The next draw is not going to be the 4-mana spell. The turn before that was their best opportunity but didn't do it. That part was scary. Just a turn earlier
Because they played Sea giants??? Lmao. They are playing an hyper aggro board centric paladin deck they won't play a 4 mana card that clears their board too
@@gustave7619 You sound stressed. He is already winning. There's no need to risk it when there's still lethal on board for next turn whether they kill the giant or not. The question then becomes, what plays does the opponent may potentially have that can turn this situation around?
@@gustave7619 the most popular and best performing lists still definitely run Keeper's Strength. It's only a tiny downside that you clear (sometimes) your own board as well for the huge upside of having a boardclear available in aggro.
I made that mistake once. The stupid thing was I was like "Well even if they buff it like crazy, there is nothing they can do to prevent lethal the next turn unless they get a board clear from Countess. And even if they do, I have a weapon that can finish them off unles they also get a taunt, and I have killed every taunt in their deck" They of course got Gigafin.
Honestly I think the archetype is way stronger than t3, it's just not really refined. Hunter, dk and naga dh are t1 decks that have abysmal winratio vs automatron builds
Ah, yes, the Ra-Den confusion... I too was very confused the first time I played one of those. As Pure Paladin, mind you, so I had very little experience with it. I also forgot it was a Deathrattle at first and thought it was a Battlecry.... Priest hasn't had any good Deathrattle cards since Xyrella rotated and I completely blanked
opponent played order in the court the previous turn where if he had it on hand, he would have definitely played it. there is still a risk though that he kept it in hand which is very unlikely.
problem i get is if i take more than 3 minions i will 100 percent miss the automatons with creation protocol. i've never played a titan that didn't get stolen and used against me. The coolest part of this deck is how many fools try to change your automatons stats and just auto concede when they realize how big a goof they just made.
Surprisingly, assuming going first, hard mull all for the automaton, and drawing 2 over 2 turns, This is about 47~% to happen every game. That’s not astronomically bad odds for sure.
Chump is the man but GD every streamer complaining about people playing old decks at the beginning of an expansion. Not everyone is setting on 50k dust or has 30$ to drop every expansion.
Looking at the deck list i would guess this is a good generic deck, but has a big weakness to early aggro and you need to get on board first to make the deck work, which means you are heavily reliant on drawing the automaton's early, i guess we will see in tha games if it plays out like that, and the wins are against slower decks.
From these matches the deck seems great but I'm guessing high aggro and some control warrior and priest matchups are triggering. Also, I'll keep saying that Reno is dumb.
Only shows games where he opens automaton (36% chance if you mulligan hard for it, so 1/3 games) drops 2000 legend rank over the course of the video. Definitely a "revolutionary" deck.
It definitely helps when you only show the highroll games too. I also tried out a Pip Automaton deck, and the games that dont have an early Automaton arent so pretty
this is the worst expansion I've ever played in 8 years it's horrible let me know if you guys feel the same everybody is just playing pure Paladin that's how bad the expansion is
When I even leave just a 1/1 dude alive, I can be sure that the Pally will buff it AND clear the board with their dumb 4 mana buff spell. It felt extremely ballsy that Chump didnt kill the Giant, especially when he already was winning big on board 😂
The opponent did an order in the court. The next draw is not going to be the 4-mana spell. The turn before that was their best opportunity but didn't do it. That part was scary. Just a turn earlier
Because they played Sea giants??? Lmao. They are playing an hyper aggro board centric paladin deck they won't play a 4 mana card that clears their board too
@@gustave7619 You sound stressed. He is already winning. There's no need to risk it when there's still lethal on board for next turn whether they kill the giant or not. The question then becomes, what plays does the opponent may potentially have that can turn this situation around?
@@gustave7619 the most popular and best performing lists still definitely run Keeper's Strength. It's only a tiny downside that you clear (sometimes) your own board as well for the huge upside of having a boardclear available in aggro.
I made that mistake once. The stupid thing was I was like "Well even if they buff it like crazy, there is nothing they can do to prevent lethal the next turn unless they get a board clear from Countess. And even if they do, I have a weapon that can finish them off unles they also get a taunt, and I have killed every taunt in their deck"
They of course got Gigafin.
Its crazy how one card can make a tier 4 deck a tier 3 deck. True revolution.
Honestly I think the archetype is way stronger than t3, it's just not really refined. Hunter, dk and naga dh are t1 decks that have abysmal winratio vs automatron builds
So glad to have your videos so frequently. :) You're wonderful!
hitting maw and paw on that last game was the most comical nail in the coffin.
Best part was that the opponent ended their turn but then conceded when its effect went off
@@svgPhoenix Damn decent of the opponent to let Maw and Paw go off before conceding
I got signature Ra-den today and I went to youtube in search of a deck for him, and I got your video on my homepage
I got a signature Ra-Den last expansion, and a signature Pip from my pre-order. Seems I was destined to play this deck
Thirsty Drifter was my name in college.
Taught that bot shaman who the real automaton deck was
Nice! Got a golden Pip and were thinking different uses for it. Definitely going to try this! Thanks!
I got signature pip and was also thinking what a crap card
I’m gonna play this and put a queen aszhara in as well
Ah, yes, the Ra-Den confusion... I too was very confused the first time I played one of those. As Pure Paladin, mind you, so I had very little experience with it. I also forgot it was a Deathrattle at first and thought it was a Battlecry.... Priest hasn't had any good Deathrattle cards since Xyrella rotated and I completely blanked
I guess he is supposed to keep Astral Automaton.
Guess so
08:00 do paladins not run keeper's strength? genuinely asking
opponent played order in the court the previous turn where if he had it on hand, he would have definitely played it. there is still a risk though that he kept it in hand which is very unlikely.
@tbsbloodheist8986 Chump did not think of this at all though, he was more worried about a random windfury buff than losing his whole board presence.
The Chumpster was quite unimpressed by his opponent playing Reno in their Warrior deck.
problem i get is if i take more than 3 minions i will 100 percent miss the automatons with creation protocol. i've never played a titan that didn't get stolen and used against me.
The coolest part of this deck is how many fools try to change your automatons stats and just auto concede when they realize how big a goof they just made.
Yeah getting your titan stolen sucks but why are you playing minions other than AA that cost < 3 mana?
Still not as cracked as it was in wild. Super slept on deck that got me to legend.
Maybe I'll revisit now that I know pip works :P
Is this version better than the version on the pip spells?
I wish Chump streamed :(
Every game shown involved Chump drawing an Astral Automaton by turn 2. What a funny coincidence
Surprisingly, assuming going first, hard mull all for the automaton, and drawing 2 over 2 turns,
This is about 47~% to happen every game. That’s not astronomically bad odds for sure.
damn did i really just watch a budding superstition get quashed by mathematics?
The last death knight felt like a bot lol
This is like Jade but for Priest
Chump is the man but GD every streamer complaining about people playing old decks at the beginning of an expansion. Not everyone is setting on 50k dust or has 30$ to drop every expansion.
Thank you Chump for your new video 😩
Love your vids ❤
Looking at the deck list i would guess this is a good generic deck, but has a big weakness to early aggro and you need to get on board first to make the deck work, which means you are heavily reliant on drawing the automaton's early, i guess we will see in tha games if it plays out like that, and the wins are against slower decks.
He likes to use the phrase:
"Its terrifying for me"
But he looks so calm even when he's terrified.
Gracias por tantos buenos videos Chump! Saludos desde Aegentina
Comments are filled with Thirsty Drifters 😂
start 6488
after 8345 😅
One of those numbers is higher than the other!
@@Resil27021that must mean he's doing something right
From these matches the deck seems great but I'm guessing high aggro and some control warrior and priest matchups are triggering. Also, I'll keep saying that Reno is dumb.
Auto-MAY-ton
This deck looks cool, but it is a meme deck at best. I tried it, only if the cards align up perfectly then you might win.
I feel this deck will get a bit worse when people start respecting the automatons
Hey alright
Wow man every single deck you play has a %100 winrate you can never lose you should attend tournaments
He literally says he went 6-2 with the deck at the start of the video.
Only shows games where he opens automaton (36% chance if you mulligan hard for it, so 1/3 games) drops 2000 legend rank over the course of the video. Definitely a "revolutionary" deck.
automaton shouldnt have been printed.
the main thing with this deck is youre supposed to keep astral automaton, which chump never did
I don't think we watched the same video
oyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
I played against 5 paladins in a row in plat, this deck isn’t viable.
golden rule. when you are offered get a free dragon every turn, you take get a free dragon every turn!
not good enough against aggros....
Yeah it’s not good.
We can always rely on Chump to take seemingly useless cards like Pip the Potent and make a decently viable deck out of it
I kinda thunk that Bliz had that planned for Pip to work with Jade priest
I mean it can consistently be a 4 mana 3/5 that gets you multiple good cards in general, doesn’t seem useless
It definitely helps when you only show the highroll games too. I also tried out a Pip Automaton deck, and the games that dont have an early Automaton arent so pretty
@@frankomancerconsidering your other comment sounds like you got a severe case of skill issue
@vigge111111 I mean according to his pfp he's a sentient wheel of stinky cheese so I wouldn't judge him too harshly
this is the worst expansion I've ever played in 8 years it's horrible let me know if you guys feel the same everybody is just playing pure Paladin that's how bad the expansion is
feel like even a single copy of Melted Maker would've been nice
Found the person who didn't watch the whole video or copy the deck code
@@svgPhoenix oops 😅
I just want to understand how dude gets like 7 of then when its 2 card max. 🤡 🌎
#InternetDeckCopyScrub