🤯 ABB GETS IT!!!! That’s it. That’s the information we need. A straight-forward process and transparency as to what is happening. And it benefits them as well. They stop getting blamed for every “sub-par” performance. Also the overhead cable management eliminates a33holes who drive over cables or want to steal cable. Well done! 👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼 No we need these everywhere not just CA.
That screen on sunny days will be terrible to see or read the information, and add to that the vandals can break them, damage them and then those chargers will have NO use whatsoever. GO TESLA. No screens, No credit card readers, SIMPLE and they work 99.9% in all Weather Conditions. And above all cheaper to manufacture .just saying
I have a Mustang Mach E GT- 2023. I recently charged my car at home to 100 % and was shocked to see 301 miles of coverage! It quickly dropped down to 290 after only driving about 1 mile, but after that mileage decreased normally! I'm somewhat surprised that I'm getting this kind of mileage since the GT is stated as getting Only 260 miles of coverage!
That screen would be a taggers heaven, lots of space to spray and cover in their spray paint colours when it's 3am in the morning and no cops or cameras to see them do it. The QR code idea is something Kempower has done since they introduced their chargers, Bjorn has shown it ages ago and the Kempower units in Australia that I've used also have the QR code and uses a browser on your mobile device so no App needed great thing as shows the curve as well for your session.
If you noticed in the video, the 400 kW is on a dual port charger and it is designed so that it can have two cars charging at the same time. It will dynamically adjust for the cars charging so it could give 200 kW to each car or it could do 300 to one car and 100 to another. It can also operate in a NEVI compliant mode so that each car is guaranteed at least 150 kW. This is definitely far from pointless and a big improvement over the common 150 kW or even 350 kW (shared) single post installs that are commonly used now.
@@MachE_VLOG Dual charges is nothing new they have been implemented by Ionity for a long time now, offering 350kw for each car totalling a 700kw charge, the thing that makes me comment this is that the marketing on these things is just misleading, it say big 400kw on the post which makes people believe they can get that for their car not realising that car limitations and sharing with others is a thing.
@@Roy-qn2ie I don't think Ionity has any 700 kW charging stations but I could be wrong. The latest model that I saw them deploy is the Alpitronic HYC400 which is similar to this ABB -- 400 kW, dual handle, & shared. Pretty much every manufacturer and CPO uses this type of marketing. Even Tesla saying their V3 SuperChargers are 250 kW is not completely accurate since they are limited by the power input for a 4 post install of around 350 kW. With all of these, you could potentially get the max or close to the max if you are the only one charging. They are also counting on the fact that most cars won't accept even the highest peak for very long. So if you pull in next to someone that is at 70% charger on this station and you plug in, you may still be able to get ~300 kW which is more than most cars would use and the other car might not be affected at all since they are at a higher state of charge. I can see both sides on how these are labeled. It is all very confusing for novice and even many experienced EV owners. For me, I wish they would label them in AMPs and let me know if they are shared or dedicated. I can figure out the rest!
![[UNCUT] “บอสณวัฒน์” ลากไส้!! ใครหนุนหลัง "แม่ตั๊ก ป๋าเบียร์" I คนดังนั่งเคลียร์ I 30 ก.ย. 67](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/QlD7mU2KKRk/mqdefault.jpg)
ABB can build /integrate all components so this is the ticket!
🤯 ABB GETS IT!!!! That’s it. That’s the information we need. A straight-forward process and transparency as to what is happening. And it benefits them as well. They stop getting blamed for every “sub-par” performance.
Also the overhead cable management eliminates a33holes who drive over cables or want to steal cable.
Well done! 👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼
No we need these everywhere not just CA.
That screen on sunny days will be terrible to see or read the information, and add to that the vandals can break them, damage them and then those chargers will have NO use whatsoever.
GO TESLA. No screens, No credit card readers, SIMPLE and they work 99.9% in all Weather Conditions.
And above all cheaper to manufacture .just saying
I have a Mustang Mach E GT- 2023. I recently charged my car at home to 100 % and was shocked to see 301 miles of coverage! It quickly dropped down to 290 after only driving about 1 mile, but after that mileage decreased normally! I'm somewhat surprised that I'm getting this kind of mileage since the GT is stated as getting Only 260 miles of coverage!
Looks great! And a good demo! Hope to see these everywhere. I wonder which DCFC providers will be installing these in Q3…?
In China “LiXiang” and “HuaWei” has 600kw, but my mach-e not compatible...
That screen would be a taggers heaven, lots of space to spray and cover in their spray paint colours when it's 3am in the morning and no cops or cameras to see them do it. The QR code idea is something Kempower has done since they introduced their chargers, Bjorn has shown it ages ago and the Kempower units in Australia that I've used also have the QR code and uses a browser on your mobile device so no App needed great thing as shows the curve as well for your session.
400kw something a Mach E will never be able to do, pointless
YOU TOTALLY RIGHT
If you noticed in the video, the 400 kW is on a dual port charger and it is designed so that it can have two cars charging at the same time. It will dynamically adjust for the cars charging so it could give 200 kW to each car or it could do 300 to one car and 100 to another. It can also operate in a NEVI compliant mode so that each car is guaranteed at least 150 kW. This is definitely far from pointless and a big improvement over the common 150 kW or even 350 kW (shared) single post installs that are commonly used now.
@@MachE_VLOG Dual charges is nothing new they have been implemented by Ionity for a long time now, offering 350kw for each car totalling a 700kw charge, the thing that makes me comment this is that the marketing on these things is just misleading, it say big 400kw on the post which makes people believe they can get that for their car not realising that car limitations and sharing with others is a thing.
@@Roy-qn2ie I don't think Ionity has any 700 kW charging stations but I could be wrong. The latest model that I saw them deploy is the Alpitronic HYC400 which is similar to this ABB -- 400 kW, dual handle, & shared. Pretty much every manufacturer and CPO uses this type of marketing. Even Tesla saying their V3 SuperChargers are 250 kW is not completely accurate since they are limited by the power input for a 4 post install of around 350 kW. With all of these, you could potentially get the max or close to the max if you are the only one charging. They are also counting on the fact that most cars won't accept even the highest peak for very long. So if you pull in next to someone that is at 70% charger on this station and you plug in, you may still be able to get ~300 kW which is more than most cars would use and the other car might not be affected at all since they are at a higher state of charge.
I can see both sides on how these are labeled. It is all very confusing for novice and even many experienced EV owners. For me, I wish they would label them in AMPs and let me know if they are shared or dedicated. I can figure out the rest!