11 carriers might seem excessive but I don't think so. The US is the center of a world wide economy, so it has carriers roughly proportional to trade. If it wasn't US carriers then it would be someone else, and there is no shortage of jerks who would be happy to take over.
It only seems excessive when you do not need those carriers. But if you look at the current crisis areas (Middle East, China, North Korea, Russia), it is probably better to have a few more than to few. As a German whose country does not have any carriers, I am glad that the Americans are our friend and allies.
China and Russia are already starting to demand 'pilotage and transit' fees for seas that they are claiming are inland waterways as if the were rivers or lakes. Once this gets out of hand global trade starts dying. You won't even get investment in super tankers and giant container ships if they are subject to piracy and arbitrary seizure. Adams created the USN and Marine Corps because US ships and crews were being held hostage by Barbary prirates. He was particulary worried about his daughter Mary seeing him in France.
A. Few I believe are in maintenance and that takes years So the 11 is more like 8 or 9... We need more More subs too. More destroyers and air defense ASAP!
Carrier qualifications for landing on and taking off from an aircraft carrier is a very perishable skill that must be constantly practiced to maintain. When the DeGaulle is down for either short term or longer term maintenance outages like a nuclear reactor refueling the French Navy Dassault Rafales are temporarily reassigned to US aircraft carriers to keep their pilots qualifications.
@@josephworzel3815 Nimitz class carriers have a mid life refueling after I think 20 or 25 years. This is when they are in drydock for a few years and are overhauled. Ford class is designed to not need refueling during its about 50 year life.
Nice video but it is pronounced "Rafal" - close to the ending of International - not RaphAEl. A rafale is a burst of wind or a burst of fire. Anyway, I am glad both US and French carriers can interact; it can be useful considering the number of SOB's around the world.
Foreign words and names are difficult at times. I've heard British news people call the US Abrams tank the "Abrahams tank". It is the tank of the Prophet?
If pronouncion was the same regardless of the language Id accept this comment but considering the fact that phonetics is a thing then... who cares, shes not french and is not speaking french!
Sauf erreur de ma part, le f35C, peut seulement atterrir ou amerir verticalement, mais a besoin d'une rampe de lancement pour effectuer un décollage court.
@@Lol-rx7sxThe F-35 can take off vertically but is then limited in load out like all vertical take off planes. All ramp take offs are planes are also limited in load out . That is why CATOBAR systems are preferred for maximum capabilities.
@@matthewhuszarik4173 That depends on which type of F-35 you mean. The F-35 A is a standard aircraft that needs a runway. The F-35 B is the "STOVL," or "short take off and vertical landing" version. The C is used on carriers and has a greater wingspan for better fuel efficiency. It's also made really rugged to take the beating from the emal system. A and B also fit on the US's amphibious assault ships. (Which is why they have smaller wingspans.)
@@joeybulford5266 You know they have actual video on You Tube demonstrating the F-35Bs ability to take off vertically from a dead stop? Yes it limits their weight and they can carry more with a rolling lift off, but the very well can lift off straight up.
Not all are out at sea at once. Some are in port for maintenance, some being resupplied. But yeah it’s good to have these seaborne air wings for force projection and to keep the sea lanes for trade open. For those uncomfortable with this, imagine having to deal with Russia, China and Iran as they jump into the void left by the withdrawal of US sea power. As the saying goes, nature abhors a vacuum.
To be fair at least one Australian bomber in WWII used a syphon from a 44 gallon drum on the plane to the wing tank when one of the crew climbed out on the wing and transferred the fuel. Admittedly that was flying back to Darwin with wounded, when they thought New Guinea was going to fall, but it was air refuelling.
Having 11 carriers doesn’t mean all 11 are available for duty. Typically 2 are in maintenance & repair, 3 are in pre-deployment training and only 5 to 6 are available for combat. It’s a different matter that just one of these carriers can change the balance of power at any hotspot in the world. Two carriers will dominate any region & three carriers will be overkill.
@@greggross8856 mirror landing system, replenishment at sea; pretty much everything about carriers. Not the ice cream machine, the Spams can have that. 😂🤣
One of my current favorite examples of Interoperability via mutually aligned national interest. The French need/want additional CV options/capability, and the Navy is more than happy to grow its list of Friends Allowed to Land Here.
It was the Uk that invented the steam catapult, arrestor wires and the angled flight deck and also mirror landing sights, also it was the Uk and not the French that did have the most powerful navy in the world, up until the second world war
And the Spanish invented Paella .The video say's "Introduced" CATOBAR not invented, and the video say's the French Navy was "One" of the most powerful, not the MOST powerful. Not sure why you need to bring the UK did this the UK did that will the video is about French plane landing on US aircraft.
elle a dit " une des marines..." et une chose qui vas te surprendre, de toutes les bataillles navales entre la france et l' angleterre, victoires, pertes, ou matchs nusl, la France sort largement vainqueur, avait les meilleurs frégates, meme copiées par l' angleterre, il maquait la qualité des équipas anglais, mais c' est une ile...pour la catapulte, bravo, pourquoi ne pas l' avoir utilisée, plus d' emport de munitions...
@@peterlangan1181 I think we can apply that Russia overestimates its strength. Russia is now at day 1000+ of its 3-14 day invasion. The problem with dictatorships is they rely on imposing propaganda and end up believing their own absurdities and fabrications. NATO supporters have been bemoaning the decline in expenditure for decades. Now the holes in funding are being plugged.
A VTOL like the Harrier or the VTOL version of the F35 has limits. VTOL is not "free of charge": it needs a huge weight of specific mechanical equipment for this, which forbids full charge vertical take-offs in some weather conditions. For a (very) little nation like France - however having ground bases on a lot of hot spots worldwide - the need is a multirole airplane : thanks to Catobar on the Charles de Gaulle also, Rafale can take off from any carrier with full load of amunition and ordnance, which is not possible with a ramp nor with VTOL all the time.
French Navy pilots before getting their wings with the Rafale are doing their training with the US Navy in fact they get their badge as US navy fighter pilot including landing and taking off from. US aircraft carrier. Training base is at Pensacola in Florida
Fourth and fifth generation fighters have different missions and are not competitors. The fifth generatoon planes are intended to destroy enemy defenses clearing the way for the more heavily armed fourth generation planes to safely approach the mission's target to destroy it. The flexibility to assemble interconnected swarms with dofferent fumctional elements in secure communications withbeach other sharing data increases the probability of mission success.
NATO is a way for the US to keep Europeans country as their slave countries. It is not a defense organization but offensive organizations, a threat for humanity.
Really, it's actually quite the opposite anyway with china and russia. They advertise what technologies they have constantly. (Whether they have them or not.) 😂
@@ericzimmerman9599yea I peep that Russia & china talk about what they have and what they equipment can do they never show not even in testing fase. But the USA will show you what they working on, shit then even film it on live tv sometimes for the world to see them fail or succeed, they just not scared of showing the world what they have or can do. shit Elon musk just showed the world he can catch w.e that thing called when it re enters earth, but that’s just America bro like we just not scared to show you, cause fuck talking & I know you heard this saying before, I can show you better then I can tell you
Currently the Gripen has a cost of $83 million, slightly more than the F-35. It is not a stealth aircraft, which greatly contributes to its much lower operating costs. However, without stealth, is an outdated fighter and probably will not fly past 2035.
Désolé, mais la furtivite passive n'aura aucun intérêt dans une dizaine d'années , car les systèmes de défense la contourneront. Seuls les systèmes actifs seront efficaces...et là c'est autre chose.
@@ericbezagu8451 You are completely incorrect on this matter. The ability of radars to detect stealth objects is already at its limits and RAM (radar absorbent materials) are still progressing. Basic university level physics.
you ask if a purely defensive alliance is a danger to world peace? no paragraph speaks of an offensive protocol. but obviously this is a problem for a country that would like to invade these smaller neighbors. a war may be led by a NATO member but that does not mean that it is a NATO war (those are two different things)
And then some. The USS Langley was the first ever aircraft carrier. It was commisioned in 1922. It was originally called the USS Jupiter and was also the first US surface ship with electronic propellers. (In 1913, when it was first built.)
@@ericzimmerman9599 Best check your facts, might have been the first US aircraft carrier but HMS ARGUS was the first fully decked aircraft carrier, which was converted from a merchant ship during WW1
Avec beaucoup plus d' argent , c' est plus facile ! pourtant le Rafale, avion omnirole, a remporté, plusieurs compétitions devant, f35, f22, sukkoy, eurofigter, grippen, etc etc, avec beaucoup moins d' argent que le f35, par exemple, qui a meme encore des problèmes...
@@didierjacob250 You also realize that those aircraft were handicapped severely during red the red air excercises you're talking about. Usually they make them fight within visual range. (Which negates entirely the advantages in radar, sensing and stealth technology that are possed by the F-35 and F-22. They also tend to only allow them to carry certain shorter range missles or sometimes no missles at all and only allow them to use certain EW/Jamming systems.) It's kind of like saying "hey, I beat up mike tyson while his hands were cuffed behind his back!" 😂😂 In real life, the F-35 or F-22 would most likely take out pretty much any plane in existence before that plane even knew they were in the area. The only one with a chance really is the J-20, but even then I don't think they could quite hang with either jet. The chinese just aren't there with their stealth technology yet. Russia DEFINETLY isn't. One of the main facets of a stealth plane is that there can't be any edges or parts that stick out and return radar. The recent crash if the S70 Ohotnik showed that not only is russia not even close to the US, but their stealth technology is relatively non-existant. Not only was there no RAM on the drone to speak of, but there were exposed rivets EVERYWHERE. It was supposed to be their equivalent if the B-2 bomber, but it looks like something that was made by children in 8th grade shop class. 😂😂
I think the English way of thinking about air craft carrier correct why because you can move most of the air aircraft in the sky at a minute moment if you have a caterpillar this will take time
Rafale in French is either a ‘squall’ or ‘fusillade of gunfire’, not a man’s name. Either choice makes it the absolute perfect name for a fighter aircraft.
Sorry, but a carrier can't outrun a plane load of iron bombs either. The notion that some wonder weapon makes carriers obsolete is based in a great deal of ignorance.
…and the angled flight deck, the ski jump, the Plimsoll line, the steam catapult, the jet engine (with the Germans), turboprop engines, radar, steam turbines, gunboat diplomacy, the Harrier, the all-moving tailplane, etc.
lets talk about military tech in WW2. Germany was way superior and they lost, the Allies had the numbers, more soldiers more of lower quality equipment.
it's partly a legend, they were better in certain areas (especially tactics) but technically not that superior, the tanks were fragile but reliable at the beginning (panzer 1 2 3 4) then resistant but a strong tendency to fall broken down and cost horribly expensive (panther, tiger 1 and 2) to the point of rising to 50% of the losses due to breakdowns. and spend their resources on very advanced projects but neither up to date nor relevant.
Yes and no, the allies were in the same weight class technologically in most areas even when the Germans had somewhat better equipment, the allies were developing jet aircraft around the same time as the Germans although the Germans deployed them first, the Germans had much more advanced rocket technology, but the Manhattan project was years ahead of the German nuclear weapons program. The Germans had some very good tanks and other front line equipment but the vast majority of allied equipment was not completely obsolete in comparison. Most of the Germans early successes were probably due more to more advanced tactics and communications rather than technology. Technology alone is not always a decisive factor but it can be, if the allied armies were equipped toworld war one standards they would certainly have lost the war no matter how many bodies they threw at the Germans. Numbers can make up for technological drawbacks to some degree but if technology or tactics are too outdated numbers can only go so far.
Carriers and for that matter, any ship, cannot survive a hypersonic weapon. This means that the aircraft carrier as we know it is obsolete. It's time to rethink naval air deployment.
That depends on the size of the warhead in the hypersonic weapon and whether it gets a good hit. By your logic the kamikaze made carriers obsolete. Except it didn't. In war, ships get sunk.
Le prochain porté avion français fera 310m de long pour 80000 tonnes et je vais sans doute travaillerdessus a saint Nazaire,par contre les pilotes américain ont du mal a atterrir sur le porte avion Charles de Gaulle il est court 😊😊
they didn't even go over teh point of the video. barelly heard one reason why the rafale operates on US carriers the rest was about how great the bF35 and grippen are.
1) because we can 2) because we've seen at least one of the 2.75 gajillion videos already produced on this topic 3) because everything is better with bacon
The exact numbers doesn’t matter it’s whether if you can afford it. A medium size adult may say a 10 ounce steak as enough. While a cow may not be enough for some. Crux is how big is your head, for a pauper 11 aircraft carriers is 10 too much.
Fesnel lens, and the catbar.system was invited by the British in or after ww2. Also we got the angled deck from the British. We gave rhem F6F Hellcat fighter,for systems. If I'm wrong can someone let me. know.
Research into countermeasures for these weapons includes high-powered lasers and microwave weapons, rail guns and hypersonic interceptors, and knockout weapons to confuse, overload or disable subs. -critical systems.
Tout simplement pour voir si des avions de qualité moyenne peuvent être compatible avec leur technologie de haute qualité. Ils ont voulu faire plaisir aux Français, comme lorsqu'on emmène un gamin à la fête foraine
A Dunkerque les anglais n'ont pas eu à sortir leur drapeau blanc, ils étaient partis (sans prévenir) grâce à l'armée française qui a contenu l'armée allemande.
The French navy was considered the strongest for over 400 years? Which 400 years was that exactly? The new French subs have glass bottoms, so the new French navy can get a good look at the old French navy. Courtesy of the Royal navy...
The Thing To Remember About Our Normally Marine Amphibious Helio Carriers,,Is They Also Launch The F-35's,,Such As The Japanese Are Taking Advantage Of,,So As To Skirt The WWII Restrictions On Aircraft Carriers,, Thankfully,,SO,, Actually We Have At Any Given Time As Many As 21 Carriers,,,And Possibly Even More In Case Of War,,Where Some Might Be Recommissioned ,,💯💪🪖🛳️🛳️🛳️🛳️🛳️🛩️🚁🛩️🚁🛩️🚁🛩️🚁🇺🇲💯🇺🇲
Not all are out at sea at once. Some are in port for maintenance, some being resupplied. But yeah it’s good to have these seaborne air wings for force projection and to keep the sea lanes for trade open. For those uncomfortable with this, imagine having to deal with Russia, China and Iran as they jump into the void left by the withdrawal of US sea power. As the saying goes, nature abhors a vacuum.
Friends for ever. Allied in every military front. From a French pilot. Respectfully
Actual pronunciation:
Charles de Gaulle = Charl de Goal
Rafale = rafal not "rafael"
Dassault = Dasso
Thank you for the helpful guide to PROPER pronunciation!
amerikans...
This is actually helpful. Thanks
Ai@@TheJKCrawford
@@kevinjennex3508 He couldn't understand the difference 🤭
11 carriers might seem excessive but I don't think so. The US is the center of a world wide economy, so it has carriers roughly proportional to trade. If it wasn't US carriers then it would be someone else, and there is no shortage of jerks who would be happy to take over.
It only seems excessive when you do not need those carriers. But if you look at the current crisis areas (Middle East, China, North Korea, Russia), it is probably better to have a few more than to few. As a German whose country does not have any carriers, I am glad that the Americans are our friend and allies.
@@zenon7094 Ja bloß müssen wir Europäer auch endlich mal in die Taschen greifen und eigene Träger bauen.
China and Russia are already starting to demand 'pilotage and transit' fees for seas that they are claiming are inland waterways as if the were rivers or lakes. Once this gets out of hand global trade starts dying. You won't even get investment in super tankers and giant container ships if they are subject to piracy and arbitrary seizure. Adams created the USN and Marine Corps because US ships and crews were being held hostage by Barbary prirates. He was particulary worried about his daughter Mary seeing him in France.
A. Few I believe are in maintenance and that takes years
So the 11 is more like 8 or 9...
We need more
More subs too.
More destroyers and air defense
ASAP!
I guess you cannot protect the US against Maga cultists with aircraft carriers.
Carrier qualifications for landing on and taking off from an aircraft carrier is a very perishable skill that must be constantly practiced to maintain. When the DeGaulle is down for either short term or longer term maintenance outages like a nuclear reactor refueling the French Navy Dassault Rafales are temporarily reassigned to US aircraft carriers to keep their pilots qualifications.
Their nuclear reactors need refueling??
@@josephworzel3815not often, but yeah. Reactors need uranium. A tiny amount compared to how much regular ships need .
Good idea!
When have you seen French pilots landing or taking off from a USA carrier?
@@josephworzel3815 Nimitz class carriers have a mid life refueling after I think 20 or 25 years. This is when they are in drydock for a few years and are overhauled.
Ford class is designed to not need refueling during its about 50 year life.
11 full sized aircraft carriers, US also has 9 amphibious assault carriers that are bigger than some countries aircraft carriers.
Good. But not necessery to brag.
@@Tillerman56I’m American and I agree they are only as good as hopefully the non-woke running them.
@@deanfirnatine7814 carrying helicopters, VTOL f35B, right?
Great knowledge
They’re pretty amazing too.
Nice video but it is pronounced "Rafal" - close to the ending of International - not RaphAEl. A rafale is a burst of wind or a burst of fire. Anyway, I am glad both US and French carriers can interact; it can be useful considering the number of SOB's around the world.
1st time I've heard that.
Foreign words and names are difficult at times. I've heard British news people call the US Abrams tank the "Abrahams tank". It is the tank of the Prophet?
LMAO... Good one!
If pronouncion was the same regardless of the language Id accept this comment but considering the fact that phonetics is a thing then... who cares, shes not french and is not speaking french!
@gilzineto her pronunciation is wrong in English too tho... She inverted letters order. Rafale isn't hard to pronounce for English speakers
Rafale and Gripen are the best 4.5-generation jets nowadays.
F-15EX?
@@gvibration1yeah, i don't think he thought that through. 😂 They're both fine planes though.
The Gripen is not combat proven, contrary to the Rafale which has demonstrated great capabilities on many occasions.
No, it's Pakistani JF 17
@@Shady689😂😂😂
Rafale is the best jet in the world
Only thing about pure vertical takeoffs is it burns up half a fighter planes fuel the ramp takeoffs saves a lot of fuel
Sauf erreur de ma part, le f35C, peut seulement atterrir ou amerir verticalement, mais a besoin d'une rampe de lancement pour effectuer un décollage court.
@@Lol-rx7sxThe F-35 can take off vertically but is then limited in load out like all vertical take off planes. All ramp take offs are planes are also limited in load out . That is why CATOBAR systems are preferred for maximum capabilities.
@@matthewhuszarik4173 That depends on which type of F-35 you mean. The F-35 A is a standard aircraft that needs a runway. The F-35 B is the "STOVL," or "short take off and vertical landing" version. The C is used on carriers and has a greater wingspan for better fuel efficiency. It's also made really rugged to take the beating from the emal system. A and B also fit on the US's amphibious assault ships. (Which is why they have smaller wingspans.)
@@matthewhuszarik4173
The F-35 can do short takeoffs, not completely vertical. It can do vertical landings tho
@@joeybulford5266 You know they have actual video on You Tube demonstrating the F-35Bs ability to take off vertically from a dead stop? Yes it limits their weight and they can carry more with a rolling lift off, but the very well can lift off straight up.
Not all are out at sea at once. Some are in port for maintenance, some being resupplied.
But yeah it’s good to have these seaborne air wings for force projection and to keep the sea lanes for trade open.
For those uncomfortable with this, imagine having to deal with Russia, China and Iran as they jump into the void left by the withdrawal of US sea power.
As the saying goes, nature abhors a vacuum.
As the Brits view the Americans better the devil you know.
Interesting. Just one thing: it's Ra faalll not Rafael. In French, this means burst as in machine gun burst or gust as in gust of wind. Slava 💙💛 !!!
Heroyam Slava !
The US had Over 100 aircraft carriers during WWII !
us should build more mini carriers as both support and emergency if the fleet carriers are absent or disabled
7:44; there are only 2 methods of midair refueling, probe & drog is the 1st and Boom is the 2nd.
To be fair at least one Australian bomber in WWII used a syphon from a 44 gallon drum on the plane to the wing tank when one of the crew climbed out on the wing and transferred the fuel. Admittedly that was flying back to Darwin with wounded, when they thought New Guinea was going to fall, but it was air refuelling.
@@WorksOnMyComputer that’s Aussie Can Do ingenuity
Having 11 carriers doesn’t mean all 11 are available for duty. Typically 2 are in maintenance & repair, 3 are in pre-deployment training and only 5 to 6 are available for combat. It’s a different matter that just one of these carriers can change the balance of power at any hotspot in the world. Two carriers will dominate any region & three carriers will be overkill.
Erm, actually the British invented the catapult and arrestor system.
And the angled flight deck.
@@greggross8856 mirror landing system, replenishment at sea; pretty much everything about carriers. Not the ice cream machine, the Spams can have that. 😂🤣
And they sell it to the russian
The armored flight deck as well.
@@Bellthorian yes indeed.
Good vid ,cheers
Tuyệt Đỉnh Của Chóp 🎉🎉❤❤
Got to love the cooperation
One of my current favorite examples of Interoperability via mutually aligned national interest. The French need/want additional CV options/capability, and the Navy is more than happy to grow its list of Friends Allowed to Land Here.
Well pretty short list since only French rafale can land on USS carrier (outside VTOLs and helicopters)
@@mathieu722 But its still a very useful list to have, and to be on.
Rafale one cool plane that delta wing has a lot of lift
because they are very good
CDG even uses US Type C-13 catapults like Nimitz class carriers, but they are just 75 instead of 94 meters long.
Very good vídeo 👍
Tout simplement comme vous et nous🇫🇷 les 🏴☠️...!! Et surtout en temps de guerres ...? ☝️les bon comptes fond de bon amis.....!! 👍
Yes
The F35C especially has a larger wing. Slava 💙💛 !!!
It was the Uk that invented the steam catapult, arrestor wires and the angled flight deck and also mirror landing sights, also it was the Uk and not the French that did have the most powerful navy in the world, up until the second world war
Ah yes, the british... always claim to invent everything, always amount to nothing... the British excel at one thing and one thing only: Failure…
And the Spanish invented Paella .The video say's "Introduced" CATOBAR not invented, and the video say's the French Navy was "One" of the most powerful, not the MOST powerful. Not sure why you need to bring the UK did this the UK did that will the video is about French plane landing on US aircraft.
elle a dit " une des marines..." et une chose qui vas te surprendre, de toutes les bataillles navales entre la france et l' angleterre, victoires, pertes, ou matchs nusl, la France sort largement vainqueur, avait les meilleurs frégates, meme copiées par l' angleterre, il maquait la qualité des équipas anglais, mais c' est une ile...pour la catapulte, bravo, pourquoi ne pas l' avoir utilisée, plus d' emport de munitions...
@@jureeratpholseela7508used ‘introduced’ to make it SEEM that it was a Yank invention.
@@johnnunn8688 assumption
Also, it occurs that being able to operate out of US carriers serves as a backup landing “strip” in an emergency.
NATO. The most powerful force in the world.
Just wait till after inauguration in 2025 when the new president leaves NATO. It' will be half the size.
NATO the force that most over estimates its actual strength.
@@peterlangan1181 I think we can apply that Russia overestimates its strength. Russia is now at day 1000+ of its 3-14 day invasion. The problem with dictatorships is they rely on imposing propaganda and end up believing their own absurdities and fabrications. NATO supporters have been bemoaning the decline in expenditure for decades. Now the holes in funding are being plugged.
Beware, at around 13 minutes into the video, you showed several Eurofighters, not the Gripen from Sweden
I can't see any EF at 13:00 and following. They are all Gripen.
12:27...
A VTOL like the Harrier or the VTOL version of the F35 has limits. VTOL is not "free of charge": it needs a huge weight of specific mechanical equipment for this, which forbids full charge vertical take-offs in some weather conditions.
For a (very) little nation like France - however having ground bases on a lot of hot spots worldwide - the need is a multirole airplane : thanks to Catobar on the Charles de Gaulle also, Rafale can take off from any carrier with full load of amunition and ordnance, which is not possible with a ramp nor with VTOL all the time.
VTOL is never used operationally, it is always STOVL and using the ramp for take-off increases the loadout to about full weight.
French Navy pilots before getting their wings with the Rafale are doing their training with the US Navy in fact they get their badge as US navy fighter pilot including landing and taking off from. US aircraft carrier. Training base is at Pensacola in Florida
Actually it is at NAS Meridian in Alabama. I've seen a news report about it.
Fourth and fifth generation fighters have different missions and are not competitors. The fifth generatoon planes are intended to destroy enemy defenses clearing the way for the more heavily armed fourth generation planes to safely approach the mission's target to destroy it. The flexibility to assemble interconnected swarms with dofferent fumctional elements in secure communications withbeach other sharing data increases the probability of mission success.
Interoperability!
More (operational) carriers than ALL other nations combined.
Long live NATO!
NATO is a way for the US to keep Europeans country as their slave countries. It is not a defense organization but offensive organizations, a threat for humanity.
I mean you don’t see china sharing this kind of information
You have any idea how much the US and other 5 eyes countries spend on intel gathering? They don't need to. 😂
Really, it's actually quite the opposite anyway with china and russia. They advertise what technologies they have constantly. (Whether they have them or not.) 😂
@@ericzimmerman9599yea I peep that Russia & china talk about what they have and what they equipment can do they never show not even in testing fase. But the USA will show you what they working on, shit then even film it on live tv sometimes for the world to see them fail or succeed, they just not scared of showing the world what they have or can do. shit Elon musk just showed the world he can catch w.e that thing called when it re enters earth, but that’s just America bro like we just not scared to show you, cause fuck talking & I know you heard this saying before, I can show you better then I can tell you
Well they're 20 years behind the west so no one cares.
Rafale meaning gust of wind not Rafael very disappointed it should have been explained.
Pronounced Ra-fall, not Raph-a-elle
Women in the military (pilots, soldiers, parachutists) should NOT have enemy contact. Imagine the barbary they would suffer when captured.
Currently the Gripen has a cost of $83 million, slightly more than the F-35. It is not a stealth aircraft, which greatly contributes to its much lower operating costs. However, without stealth, is an outdated fighter and probably will not fly past 2035.
Désolé, mais la furtivite passive n'aura aucun intérêt dans une dizaine d'années , car les systèmes de défense la contourneront. Seuls les systèmes actifs seront efficaces...et là c'est autre chose.
@@ericbezagu8451 You are completely incorrect on this matter. The ability of radars to detect stealth objects is already at its limits and RAM (radar absorbent materials) are still progressing. Basic university level physics.
NATO is not a danger for the world's peace? That's the question.
you ask if a purely defensive alliance is a danger to world peace? no paragraph speaks of an offensive protocol. but obviously this is a problem for a country that would like to invade these smaller neighbors.
a war may be led by a NATO member but that does not mean that it is a NATO war (those are two different things)
Much less that a imperial Russia.
You forgot to mention Italian Carrier Cavour..
Nope. It is mentioned.
❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
F35 can’t do a vertical takeoff, but the Harrier can.
Yes it can
@@Jaysqualitypartsnot operationally. It can only takeoff vertically when loaded with no weapons and it’s fuel tank a third of the way full.
@@saladv6069the harrier also couldn’t take off vertically with a full load.
Le rafale français le f18 américains et le f-35 marine ont le même système d'arpentage en commun
100 years?
And then some. The USS Langley was the first ever aircraft carrier. It was commisioned in 1922. It was originally called the USS Jupiter and was also the first US surface ship with electronic propellers. (In 1913, when it was first built.)
@@ericzimmerman9599 Best check your facts, might have been the first US aircraft carrier but HMS ARGUS was the first fully decked aircraft carrier, which was converted from a merchant ship during WW1
Huh, Swedish factories are full of super models...
before bragging about the size of the aircraft carrier, keep in mind that from the sky, large boat = easier to detect and target ...
US army most powerful💥
Avec beaucoup plus d' argent , c' est plus facile ! pourtant le Rafale, avion omnirole, a remporté, plusieurs compétitions devant, f35, f22, sukkoy, eurofigter, grippen, etc etc,
avec beaucoup moins d' argent que le f35, par exemple, qui a meme encore des problèmes...
@@didierjacob250 You also realize that those aircraft were handicapped severely during red the red air excercises you're talking about. Usually they make them fight within visual range. (Which negates entirely the advantages in radar, sensing and stealth technology that are possed by the F-35 and F-22. They also tend to only allow them to carry certain shorter range missles or sometimes no missles at all and only allow them to use certain EW/Jamming systems.) It's kind of like saying "hey, I beat up mike tyson while his hands were cuffed behind his back!" 😂😂 In real life, the F-35 or F-22 would most likely take out pretty much any plane in existence before that plane even knew they were in the area. The only one with a chance really is the J-20, but even then I don't think they could quite hang with either jet. The chinese just aren't there with their stealth technology yet. Russia DEFINETLY isn't. One of the main facets of a stealth plane is that there can't be any edges or parts that stick out and return radar. The recent crash if the S70 Ohotnik showed that not only is russia not even close to the US, but their stealth technology is relatively non-existant. Not only was there no RAM on the drone to speak of, but there were exposed rivets EVERYWHERE. It was supposed to be their equivalent if the B-2 bomber, but it looks like something that was made by children in 8th grade shop class. 😂😂
I think the English way of thinking about air craft carrier correct why because you can move most of the air aircraft in the sky at a minute moment if you have a caterpillar this will take time
Caterpillar? 😂😂
Rafale in French is either a ‘squall’ or ‘fusillade of gunfire’, not a man’s name.
Either choice makes it the absolute perfect name for a fighter aircraft.
with the hyper........missiles it is less and less of an asset because they move slowly
Sorry, but a carrier can't outrun a plane load of iron bombs either. The notion that some wonder weapon makes carriers obsolete is based in a great deal of ignorance.
Didn't the Brits invent the carrier and the arresting wires system?
…and the angled flight deck, the ski jump, the Plimsoll line, the steam catapult, the jet engine (with the Germans), turboprop engines, radar, steam turbines, gunboat diplomacy, the Harrier, the all-moving tailplane, etc.
France needs US aircarriers with only one. 😂
French carrier is better to fly from though. IT has a pub!
@@rickwylie7322 I didn't know they had a pub! Gotta hand it to the French, they take their food and drink seriously!
France needs nothing dude
@@rickwylie7322 à utiliser "avec modération "
Les Français ont besoin de vous?? sur quel sujet ?😂😂😂
My pick - Grippen.
pour mettre dans ton jardin !
😍😍😍😍😍😍😍😍😍❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️
Wasn’t the catapult a British invention?
lets talk about military tech in WW2.
Germany was way superior and they lost,
the Allies had the numbers, more soldiers more of lower quality equipment.
it's partly a legend, they were better in certain areas (especially tactics) but technically not that superior, the tanks were fragile but reliable at the beginning (panzer 1 2 3 4) then resistant but a strong tendency to fall broken down and cost horribly expensive (panther, tiger 1 and 2) to the point of rising to 50% of the losses due to breakdowns.
and spend their resources on very advanced projects but neither up to date nor relevant.
Yes and no, the allies were in the same weight class technologically in most areas even when the Germans had somewhat better equipment, the allies were developing jet aircraft around the same time as the Germans although the Germans deployed them first, the Germans had much more advanced rocket technology, but the Manhattan project was years ahead of the German nuclear weapons program. The Germans had some very good tanks and other front line equipment but the vast majority of allied equipment was not completely obsolete in comparison. Most of the Germans early successes were probably due more to more advanced tactics and communications rather than technology. Technology alone is not always a decisive factor but it can be, if the allied armies were equipped toworld war one standards they would certainly have lost the war no matter how many bodies they threw at the Germans. Numbers can make up for technological drawbacks to some degree but if technology or tactics are too outdated numbers can only go so far.
Carriers and for that matter, any ship, cannot survive a hypersonic weapon. This means that the aircraft carrier as we know it is obsolete. It's time to rethink naval air deployment.
That depends on the size of the warhead in the hypersonic weapon and whether it gets a good hit. By your logic the kamikaze made carriers obsolete. Except it didn't. In war, ships get sunk.
So the French make some good kit. And?
I thought France dropped out of NATO?
was only from the joint operations. they never completly got out of NATO per say
@@Netscape-kd6mg and there back now
Le prochain porté avion français fera 310m de long pour 80000 tonnes et je vais sans doute travaillerdessus a saint Nazaire,par contre les pilotes américain ont du mal a atterrir sur le porte avion Charles de Gaulle il est court 😊😊
Rafale not Rafael 😭
What does Zeus have to say about this?
On s'en moque 😃🤣😉
It's not yhe number of carriers that's the problem. It's their vulnerability to hypersonic missiles.
All these french teachers in the comments jeez 😂😢😮😅😊
Back ground nouse and music is terrible, probably a good video but I will not know
Just get to the point. Waste of time
they didn't even go over teh point of the video. barelly heard one reason why the rafale operates on US carriers the rest was about how great the bF35 and grippen are.
Till Trump slaps 10% tariff on everything alienating a lot of friends
Nato strongest forever
Rafaelo , donatelo...
1) because we can
2) because we've seen at least one of the 2.75 gajillion videos already produced on this topic
3) because everything is better with bacon
The exact numbers doesn’t matter it’s whether if you can afford it. A medium size adult may say a 10 ounce steak as enough. While a cow may not be enough for some. Crux is how big is your head, for a pauper 11 aircraft carriers is 10 too much.
Grief-fin ?
Rafale not Rafael.
you say rafall not rafael
I'd rather hear a British man do the narration. But, not bad.
Combined
Fesnel lens, and the catbar.system was invited by the British in or after ww2. Also we got the angled deck from the British. We gave rhem F6F Hellcat fighter,for systems. If I'm wrong can someone let me. know.
La lentille de Fresnel a été inventée par ... Augustin Fresnel ingénieur français. La première fut installée au phare de Cordouan au printemps 1823.
@@marcyvon8404 Exactly
海上に進水？誤訳だろ！
Greepen?
Dongfeng.
Because they can is the best answer.
Rafale =\= Raphael...
Cannot overall beat the F22 Faptor at this stage !!!
Actually a British invention se Commander Mitchell (Scottish engineer)
In the age of hypersonic missiles and drones, aircraft carrier is obsolete
Of course no
um the hypersonic missile can be intercepted by lasers and other hypersonics
@krisshnapeswanipeswani3190 in your dreams
Research into countermeasures for these weapons includes high-powered lasers and microwave weapons, rail guns and hypersonic interceptors, and knockout weapons to confuse, overload or disable subs. -critical systems.
@pashapasovski5860 um my dreams. Have you heard of skysrstreak, hpls, leonidas ect
bla bla bla
Worst pronunciation of Rafale ever
Tout simplement pour voir si des avions de qualité moyenne peuvent être compatible avec leur technologie de haute qualité.
Ils ont voulu faire plaisir aux Français, comme lorsqu'on emmène un gamin à la fête foraine
All is good until the frogs bust out their battle flag. The white one
A Dunkerque les anglais n'ont pas eu à sortir leur drapeau blanc, ils étaient partis (sans prévenir) grâce à l'armée française qui a contenu l'armée allemande.
The French navy was considered the strongest for over 400 years? Which 400 years was that exactly? The new French subs have glass bottoms, so the new French navy can get a good look at the old French navy. Courtesy of the Royal navy...
De jolis joujoux payes par les contribuables français au service des intérêts impérialistes américains .
নতুন বাজার অফিসার আসেন
The Thing To Remember About Our Normally Marine Amphibious Helio Carriers,,Is They Also Launch The F-35's,,Such As The Japanese Are Taking Advantage Of,,So As To Skirt The WWII Restrictions On Aircraft Carriers,, Thankfully,,SO,, Actually We Have At Any Given Time As Many As 21 Carriers,,,And Possibly Even More In Case Of War,,Where Some Might Be Recommissioned ,,💯💪🪖🛳️🛳️🛳️🛳️🛳️🛩️🚁🛩️🚁🛩️🚁🛩️🚁🇺🇲💯🇺🇲
Not all are out at sea at once. Some are in port for maintenance, some being resupplied.
But yeah it’s good to have these seaborne air wings for force projection and to keep the sea lanes for trade open.
For those uncomfortable with this, imagine having to deal with Russia, China and Iran as they jump into the void left by the withdrawal of US sea power.
As the saying goes, nature abhors a vacuum.
Grief-fin ?