Steel Design - Base Plates - Fixed base plate design calculations - SD424

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 7 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 47

  • @isatayyib1544
    @isatayyib1544 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    You have earned my following. I once used your video to understand wind load analysis, I have searched for textbooks explaining this but I found none that explained in this context as I was having a very high eccentricity.
    I'd be glad if you could make a video explaining the design of moment Stiffeners on some of these bases.

  • @SouvikCivil
    @SouvikCivil 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    BEST EXPLANTION OF ALL! Thank you. I watched many other videos before yours but this one truly is the best explained

  • @nehasinha1463
    @nehasinha1463 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    After a very long time I could really go through a meaningful lecture where I don't need to search for info in bits and pieces. thanks a lot. really impressed.

  • @RickyTeachey
    @RickyTeachey 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This was a very helpful refresher for me to check some base plates today for some vertically cantilevered solar panel carports. Thanks!

  • @markmusk521
    @markmusk521 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    thank you very much , I was having trouble ... i could'n figure out how it was similar to a cantilever ... now it's clear, thanks.

  • @SirKombabomba
    @SirKombabomba ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Exceptionally helpful lesson from you -Thanx

  • @jnetbs1926
    @jnetbs1926 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hello sir, first thank you for sharing your knowledge. I would appreciate a clarification on the assumed stress-strain of concrete on minute 11:50. Are you assuming that concrete behaves in a such a way where strain grows with a constant stress of 60% of it's compressive strength? how is this equal to assuming the stress distribution is a rectangle at the column base rather than a triangle? My confusion is trying to relate material behavior to stress distribution.

  • @tommartinez4797
    @tommartinez4797 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great explanation - thanks!

  • @iecivil
    @iecivil 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very well explained! Thanks for sharing

  • @LEAA2312
    @LEAA2312 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks for vedio. In the last equation for the tension side, what is the 'm' ? Thanks!

  • @HaithamBrasneh
    @HaithamBrasneh 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you for this greate tutorial 💐💐

  • @LinTin-im8ib
    @LinTin-im8ib 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I have a question about the formula you have used, Bb*t^2/4. Don't we need to use the section modulus formula Bb*t^2/6 instead?

    • @richard_walls
      @richard_walls  7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The plastic section modulus is used, rather than the elastic one.

  • @robinllabres5969
    @robinllabres5969 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Would you take the same approach for a baseplated RHS.

  • @gadkotfirasti5219
    @gadkotfirasti5219 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    sir if the column section is Hollow square box section 150 x 150 mm then how to design the base plate for that section?
    because For ISHB Isection the flange and web was there which is not for Box section..
    Both Width and Length are same in that case..
    sir please clear my doubt..
    how to manually design base plate for Box column section?
    everyone is explaining about I section..

  • @nawshadb1461
    @nawshadb1461 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    how would you proceed with a circular base plate instead of a rectangular one?

  • @jehademad4059
    @jehademad4059 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    kindly how to apply this on circular hollow section

  • @mhgengineering9256
    @mhgengineering9256 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    How about necessity of gussets & stiffner plates in detailing of fixed base plate?

  • @TiagoBrazil78
    @TiagoBrazil78 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Congratulations Teacher, great class!
    I have a question: when Tb is negative (vertical up), how should I interpret it?
    I made a file for automatic calculation in Excel software.

  • @steelramesh
    @steelramesh 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good work👍

  • @MultiNiravshah
    @MultiNiravshah 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very well
    Explained

  • @richardvanleeuwen6640
    @richardvanleeuwen6640 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great explanation sir! Is there a similar method for circular column bases with a larger quantity of anchors? Problem that i encounter is having too many variables. Kind regards Richard

    • @RickyTeachey
      @RickyTeachey 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Two yrs later: calculate the geometric center of the anchor group (assuming all the anchors are the same cross section). That geometric center will be the location of your "Tb" (which is just the sum of all the anchor forces now). Then run through the method above. After you have determined all variables, go back and distribute the total Tb force to the anchors using:
      sum of anchor group moments = Tb*(d1-x/2)
      and
      sum of anchor group forces = Tb

  • @andronikusriansylumembang796
    @andronikusriansylumembang796 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great explanation sir, thankyou so much.
    But i would like to ask a question. In designing base plate, do we only consider this cross section? What about the other cross section about weak axes of the column? Thank you

    • @richard_walls
      @richard_walls  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Bending about the weak axis can be done in the same way for calculating the stress blocks and forces. However, you will need plastic analysis or FEM to design the actual base plate. It is unusual to have high moments about the weak axis in real structures. if you did, you would probably add stiffeners to the base plate, which would also make the design easier

  • @MustafaAhmed-mb7hu
    @MustafaAhmed-mb7hu 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great explanation...can you please make a video on Welded Splice Design in steel Beams

    • @richard_walls
      @richard_walls  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      If you have a look at the videos on connections of the work this covers much of the information. However, we haven't had a chance for your proposal. Thanks

  • @burhanadenwala6803
    @burhanadenwala6803 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    How are stiffeners going to change design calculation steps ?

    • @richard_walls
      @richard_walls  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      You will change the steel plate design. Plastic analysis can be used for the plate between stiffeners. Stiffened can be designed as small columns.

  • @ajazsayyed8487
    @ajazsayyed8487 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sir plz tell me detailing about if steel column and above it a RCC beam is fixed.

    • @richard_walls
      @richard_walls  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Possibly easiest to have a large plate on top of the steel column with fixing lugs/anchors/welded-on-bars which get cast into the concrete. You would need to design the plate and cast-in system for the load applied.

  • @joker75369
    @joker75369 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sir, what if there are two direction moment acting on the base plate?

    • @richard_walls
      @richard_walls  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      The Green Book (SAISC Connection Handbook) has some good guidelines for this. The principles are similar to what is shown above.

  • @amitsarpanch
    @amitsarpanch 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    which code book you used?

    • @richard_walls
      @richard_walls  5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Dear Amit. This is primarily based on the "Green Book" in South Africa for the design of connections, published by the SAISC. Guidelines are based upon the Canadian steel design code.
      Thanks

  • @lokesh7532
    @lokesh7532 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hey, what is the value of fyi and Fy

    • @richard_walls
      @richard_walls  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      fy is 355 MPa in South Africa for our main structural steel. It ranges a bit between countries.

    • @lokesh7532
      @lokesh7532 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      But you used symbol stand for 'phy' which is multiplied by Fy, i want to know the value of that symbol, used in formula of resistance moment

    • @richard_walls
      @richard_walls  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@lokesh7532 Psi_i is a material partial factor. It accounts for material strength varying, and possibly not being exactly as specified. in South Africa it has a value of 0.9. For EN calculations often a value of 1.0 is used.

    • @lokesh7532
      @lokesh7532 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@richard_walls thanks sir,
      I m from india thats why, i am asking because we use indian standard codes, and method to find the thickness is base plate is different, but you method is excellent

  • @engineermistructe3768
    @engineermistructe3768 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    excellent

  • @ajazsayyed8487
    @ajazsayyed8487 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Best sir.

  • @lyndan7883
    @lyndan7883 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks Sir

  • @navalfa7291
    @navalfa7291 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Jesus. all you have to do is calculate the thickness of a baseplate. Not design a rocket Engine. Looks so complicated.

  • @Ordinary-person62
    @Ordinary-person62 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Blah blah blah. 4 line calculation OMG what are you teaching in universities?