Audio | J. Krishnamurti & David Bohm - Gstaad 1975 - 7: If thought cannot achieve, why should it...

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 28 ก.ย. 2024
  • Subtitles available in: ENGLISH, FINNISH
    J. Krishnamurti & David Bohm - Gstaad 1975 - 7: If thought cannot achieve, why should it suffer?
    Series: Truth, actuality, and the limits of thought
    Summary:
    How does science investigate the mysterious?
    If thought cannot achieve, why should it suffer?
    Can consciousness, which is filled with the things of thought, empty itself?
    Thought cannot possibly apprehend, comprehend or be aware of the whole.
    Time.
    Krishnamurti’s early years.
    ---
    This channel is managed by the Krishnamurti Foundation Trust​​, UK​, and by the Krishnamurti Foundation of America.
    The role of the foundations was described by Krishnamurti when he said,​ ​'The foundations will see to it that these teachings are kept whole, are not distorted, are not made corrupt. They will not give rise to any sectarian spirit in their activities... nor create any kind of place of worship around the teachings or the person.​'​
    We maintain extensive archives of Krishnamurti's original works and all four Krishnamurti foundations are actively engaged in the publication of material in various forms.
    Our videos contain thousands of subtitles in more than 25 languages, translated by volunteers from all over the world. If you would like to help us with translating subtitles, please contact us at digital@kfoundation.org
    For more information about J. Krishnamurti and the Krishnamurti foundations:
    International Site - www.jkrishnamur...
    Facebook - / jk.krishnamurti
    Twitter - / orgkrishnamurti
    Krishnamurti Foundation Trust, UK - www.kfoundation...
    Krishnamurti Foundation of America - www.kfa.org/
    Krishnamurti Foundation of India - www.kfionline.org/
    Fundación Krishnamurti Latinoamericana - www.fkla.org/
    This organization is a registered charity. Registered charity number: 312865
    © 1975 Krishnamurti Foundation Trust

ความคิดเห็น • 35

  • @papagabriola6494
    @papagabriola6494 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    If any of us is not agnostic (assume the word is the thing here), then we are led by thought. Begin.

  • @bharathbhushan916
    @bharathbhushan916 3 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    1:38:28 levitation

  • @TheMonacarol
    @TheMonacarol ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Amazing ❤

  • @vamcKrishna97
    @vamcKrishna97 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    28:30 unconsciousness
    What does it do

  • @BEDLAMITE-5280ft.
    @BEDLAMITE-5280ft. ปีที่แล้ว +2

    It’s penetrated through ritual magic. The theosophist highest mystery is the mystery of generation.

  • @wdwdHenry9022
    @wdwdHenry9022 2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    These talks are a real treasure
    I have a sense that he is watching over us still
    Thank you K sir.
    🙏🏻

    • @jayadityag7670
      @jayadityag7670 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      That is still thought

    • @methane13
      @methane13 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@jayadityag7670 😀

  • @rajagopalramani3719
    @rajagopalramani3719 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Beautiful beautiful beautiful wonderful wonderful wonderful love you love you love you. Give everything in actuality let it flower. Thank you thank you thank you 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏

  • @gocorona4381
    @gocorona4381 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Scary.....

  • @nagarjunachoudary1757
    @nagarjunachoudary1757 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    1:33:53 When he talks about his experience in Bombay, the water turning sweet on the second round, is it the effect of sanyaasi or K

    • @tusharyechakar9138
      @tusharyechakar9138 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I understand that it was due to old sannyasin but he himself was not aware of it.

    • @nagarjunachoudary1757
      @nagarjunachoudary1757 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You are correct, the sanyaasi was unaware, the point was the pointlessness of the strange or seemingly mysterious. Thanks.

  • @johnchappell9232
    @johnchappell9232 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Thought has a relationship to feeling as a particle has to a wave.
    It's possible to trace the immediate path of a thought, in its isolation, but feelings are more like a Web.The distribution of feeling is such that its impossible to tell its immediate situation.
    Thoughts seem to be a method of engagement with the Web of feeling, but then occasionally a thought will appear out of the Web also.
    For example when I feel love it is most relatable to the senses and perceptions inherent in the structure of bird life. So if I think of birds, how they behave to each other, their priorities etc, it gives me a framework on which to construct a thought. And to relay that to another.
    When relaying the entire feeling is impossible.
    Perhaps thought is a communication device and when communication is limited amongst individuals it becomes full of static.

  • @nickidaisydandelion4044
    @nickidaisydandelion4044 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    The mysterious is mysterious because we haven't explored into it scientifically Yet. Once we do it's no longer mysterious. But there will always be mysterious things happening out there because we will Never explore everything simply for the reason that things are infinite thus there will be infinitely many mysterious things happening. And it's all ok we don't need to explore and explain everything/endlessly.

    • @karanagrawal8499
      @karanagrawal8499 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      He is not talk of such mystery of which you are refering to. In his 6 talk percievieng without perciever

    • @zeynelblknc
      @zeynelblknc 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      what you talk about is what they refer to as the reality which is created by thought, in reality, a lot of things which are unknown can be discovered, explained, and they say that since in modern age a lot of things are being explained, discovered, people started to lose the sense of mystery in general, but K says that there is an another mystery which is of a different order and cannot possibly be touched by thought ever, hence science cannot also.

  • @img008
    @img008 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    35:00

  • @sachindivakar632
    @sachindivakar632 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    If someone don't have knowledge / understanding of what mystery it is how observer will be Mysterious ?

    • @billabongg973
      @billabongg973 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      There is no observer separate from the observed, thats the mystery.

  • @a_man_jaiswal
    @a_man_jaiswal 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    47:24

  • @robertopuccianti8498
    @robertopuccianti8498 ปีที่แล้ว

    🙏🧡🌻

  • @leilamobasserii
    @leilamobasserii 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    ❤️

  • @janrod3974
    @janrod3974 6 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Is there more to be told about the friendship between K and David Bohm? Somehow I am curious...

    • @KFoundation
      @KFoundation  6 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      Thank you for your comment. There is indeed much to be told about K and Bohm's remarkable collaboration. A book on the topic came out recently, you can find it at this link: amzn.eu/dJ66Jic Also, stay tuned for more features on K and Bohm from the Foundations' side.

    • @senk2352
      @senk2352 6 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      One of the most illuminating conversations between K and DB.
      Like The Ending of Time, the book "The Limits of Thought" contains revealing conversations.

    • @henrylopez945
      @henrylopez945 6 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Sorry my friend, but love, friendship has no bias, no opinion, no view on the harmonious communication , that's what love is and, fortunately for both these gentlemen that they found each other, makes my understanding a bit clearer by understanding how together they have explained clarity each with their own language.
      I'm happy, aren't you my friend, happy!

    • @richardcrocker8048
      @richardcrocker8048 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Down the rabbit hole we go ....

    • @sylviagung1007
      @sylviagung1007 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      One way relationship. Find out for yourself. Don't trust anyone or any authority!

  • @alexfifi9734
    @alexfifi9734 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Please