Fanon vs. Hegel

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 25 ต.ค. 2022
  • In this episode, I outline Fanon's criticisms of Hegel's 'Master/Slave' dialectic.
    If you want to support me, you can do that with these links:
    Patreon: / theoryandphilosophy
    paypal.me/theoryphilosophy
    Twitter: @DavidGuignion
    IG: @theory_and_philosophy
  • บันเทิง

ความคิดเห็น • 26

  • @bravovince3070
    @bravovince3070 ปีที่แล้ว +29

    Deleuze declaring "there are no more masters, only slaves controlling other slaves" makes a lot more sense after watching this

    • @tcmackgeorges12
      @tcmackgeorges12 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      That’s because unlike most of the other Post-Structuralist Deleuze actual read Fanon

    • @alex-7578
      @alex-7578 ปีที่แล้ว

      check out Zizeks lecture on Whose Servant is The Master (here on youtube) for more

  • @lilijovic-peu300
    @lilijovic-peu300 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I have an essay on Red Skin White White Masks due tomorrow! The timing of this series is uncanny

  • @jacavanheesch4593
    @jacavanheesch4593 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    its weird how extremely intelligent people often still think in these extremely narrow universalist frameworks where everyone is expected to act in one way or another based on their role, as if people arent all different in their personality and will not react drastically different from one another based on their roles or environments.

    • @akashp01
      @akashp01 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      wot m8

    • @jacavanheesch4593
      @jacavanheesch4593 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@akashp01 the idea that someone in a slave role necessarily views himself as something which needs to transform into something better, rather than feeling so locked in place that they dont interspect anymore. or that a master thinks of himself as a finished product rather then something which needs to improve in order to be deserving of such a role. these things can be flipped around depending on the type of person or time or place or culture they are in. yet very often very smart people desperately want to create a single overarching narrative to define people and their relations in.

    • @akashp01
      @akashp01 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@jacavanheesch4593 agreed ✅

    • @jacavanheesch4593
      @jacavanheesch4593 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@akashp01 thank bruv. bye the way lol is that karl marx from that chinese propaganda anime in your profile pic?

    • @akashp01
      @akashp01 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@jacavanheesch4593 Yes

  • @Self-Duality
    @Self-Duality ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Interesting thinking, my friend! 😌💭

  • @politics4270
    @politics4270 ปีที่แล้ว

    speak without fear sir.😊

  • @caiasmith1341
    @caiasmith1341 ปีที่แล้ว

    Have you considered covering la frontera?

    • @TheoryPhilosophy
      @TheoryPhilosophy  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Already have

    • @caiasmith1341
      @caiasmith1341 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@TheoryPhilosophy oh excellent! I'll check it out asap. It's one my favorites

  • @numbersix8919
    @numbersix8919 ปีที่แล้ว

    David refutes Hegel's conjecture with example of masters who "...enslave people to attain a higher order of being." Sounds frighteningly alienated to me. Unless this is a higher order in the sense of the material conditions necessary to reproduce their horrible selves. And an elaborated culture that supports their evil. That would Fanon's sense, would it not? The material conditions that liberate the individual from Marxian "necessity" and enable individual choice, and freedom. And yet the rulers are also ruled by necessities of a different kind. The alienation, trivial pursuits, and distorted apprehension of reality are what Hegel is referring to as the natural oppression of the master. It's spiritual alienation.

  • @emmarampf7354
    @emmarampf7354 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Do u have deleuze

  • @nowhereman6019
    @nowhereman6019 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    We really need to just abolish the subject/object relation and self identity already. Hegel was wrong, this has caused nothing but harm.