I flew the UH-1H Iroquois helicopters with 35 Squadron when it was based in Townsville QLD. At that time, 35 Sqn was a joint aircraft unit. We had Caribou fixed wing aircraft and the “Huey” choppers. I served there for 12 months before being posted to the Middle East to fly Huey’s in the Peace Keeping Force between Egypt and Israel. I was then posted back to 35 Sqn in Townsville & stayed there for another 2.5 years. Wonderful memories & great experiences. I salute all present day & former Military Veterans.
Just saw a US Coast Guard C-27J flying overhead near US Coast Guard Air Station Sacramento in Northern California. It sounds and looks like a miniature C-130. Hope to visit Australia some day, Australians seem to like Americans and the feeling is mutual.
The ADF downgraded the role of the C27 in July 2021 to humanitarian and emergency response to natural disasters. The aircraft was purchased to fulfill the battlefield airlift role. Going from battlefield airlift to humanitarian roles is a major redefinition in the ADFs operational expectations for this aircraft. For everyone, that does not agree with me, go and do your research!
What the C-27j was acquired to do, transportation of goods and troops, it is doing as intended. It is the battle field protection avionics which was bought as with the US Spartans. Due to the US government not acquiring the full complement of Spartans, they were going to acquire up to 140 aircraft, the battle field protection avionics there are issues over that. The battle field protection avionics can be upgraded. The C-130js are currently being upgraded.
Camomile, instead of talking out your butt (seriously, your post is rubbish), try googling 'fitted for but not with'. Budgets have priorities. Flying C-27s out of Kabul or Khartoum isn't a priority right now, or in the near future.
Nessun paese anglosassone acquisterà un aereo ,una nave , un sottomarino che non venga dal Commonwealth o come cavolo si chiama .così è da 100 anni e così sarà.anche se vi costerà il quadruplo.mu risulta che le fregate inglesi vi costeranno 4 miliardi di dollari un pezzo, 4 volte le fremm italiane, e saranno operative nel 2035, quando saranno già vecchie . Voi australiani ragionate così: non ci importa cosa è meglio, non ci importa quanti costa, l importante è acquistare Commonwealth.poi, se c'è la prendiamo in culo, c'è lo prendiamo volentieri l importante è che sia anglosassone.
If they are not military capable then we need to modify half the fleet as fire-fighting tankers. US has a certified roll-on system for hercs that could be adjusted for C-27 operations.
SEVEN aircraft? (Tin hats and flak jackets time). When I was serving with 486 SQN. Richmond, we managed to fly, ALL 24 C130 Hercules, of 36 and 37 SQN. Drove the locals nuts in Richmond, when they returned low over the town in flights of 3, 8 times.
Underpowered???? The C-27j is the most powerful twin turboprop military transport aircraft. The latest upgrades, there is an option to have the engines to have an output of 5,100 shp.
@@NoTaboos However the c-27j can take a greater load than the AN-32. Plus the RR AE2100D2 engines on the C-27J are lighter more efficient than the ZMKB Progress AI-20DM. Also the C-27j has superior internal dimensions.
@@NoTaboos Well if you did you wouldn't be able to land them on small improvised landing strips. That would have been a problem during the Bush fires.
I remember seeing f111s amongst others flying over brissy all the time in the 80s 90s now you see no RAAF aircraft at all. It's sad. Where as every 15min in Townsville flocks of hornets buzz the town,I know because of the training base and that it's a garrison city. Please RAAF, please buzz Logan and Brissy a bit more. Yes I'm a RAAF c.ck but who isn't a little deep down. We get more hooks than cops,more commercial airlines flying over, how about a superhornet 2 ship or f35 pleeeeeease.
G.222 Panda, they first came into service in the late 70s with the Italian air force, the US then got a number of them and called them C-27A Spartans. So still a Panda despite what the yanks call them
Wrong! The C-27J Spartan has been totally redeveloped from the G-222 or C-27a. With far more powerful engines, modern avionics, stronger fuselage, completely new undercarriage etc.
The US made significant upgrades to the Panda, including a new cockpit, engines, and propellor design from the Hercules, hence it was redesignated the C-27 A Spartan. The C-27 J evolved from experience with the C-27A and the Panda. It is a significantly better aircraft. The C27J Spartan kept the US style designation because it now has significant interoperability with the C-130J platform. Compared to the Panda it has 35% greater range, and 15% higher cruising speed. The RAAF chose the Spartan due to the cargo space is large enough to carry G-Wagons and palletized goods.
Wouldn’t have been click bait if we got to see more than just 1 plane take off. Should be ashamed of yourselves. 7 planes on a runway is not a mass takeoff nor is 1 plane taking off, unless of course you are talking in the absolute literal form of a mass taking off but you weren’t!! Very embarrassing for us Australians if this is the best our armed forces can do, shame on you, shame 👎🏻
Another aircraft purchased by Defence that can’t do the job it was bought to do. No department wastes money better than Defence. God help us if the ADF actually had to rely on the equipment and platforms that have been purchased that do not perform or cannot fulfill their intended role, in the event the Chinese arrive in our backyard looking for a fight.
The Spartan is a great multi role aircraft and it is one of the most capable battlefield airlifters, transport and cargo planes. It is great because it can fit the gap between the chinook and the herc. Get your facts straight before commenting.
The bigger question is, what is the capability it was purchased to deliver? I’m guessing the argument is, the Spartan can’t go everywhere the Caribou could.
I flew the UH-1H Iroquois helicopters with 35 Squadron when it was based in Townsville QLD.
At that time, 35 Sqn was a joint aircraft unit. We had Caribou fixed wing aircraft and the “Huey” choppers.
I served there for 12 months before being posted to the Middle East to fly Huey’s in the Peace Keeping Force between Egypt and Israel.
I was then posted back to 35 Sqn in Townsville & stayed there for another 2.5 years.
Wonderful memories & great experiences.
I salute all present day & former Military Veterans.
I love the C 27s there like tiny C 130s or short C 160s.
Lot's of love to Australia from your brother INDIA ALWAYS STAND STRONG AND UNITED WITH YOU. 🇮🇳❤️🇦🇺💪💪👍👍✌️✌️
Italian engineering, bravo Italia
Great contract for the Italians, Leonardo really doing well. 👏 bravo
What an awesome display from a Sqn congratulations 35 wish I could have been there to see it stay safe and please take care over thee summer months
Excellent Work..RAAF
magnifico avion que excelente que mi pais compro 4 y ojala se compren mas saludos desde perú🇵🇪🇵🇪🇵🇪🇵🇪🇵🇪🇵🇪👋👋👋
Just saw a US Coast Guard C-27J flying overhead near US Coast Guard Air Station Sacramento in Northern California. It sounds and looks like a miniature C-130. Hope to visit Australia some day, Australians seem to like Americans and the feeling is mutual.
Saw a C27J fly over me yesterday (North GC) they definetly stand out 👍
Thank you for your service to all of our ADF members
Love the 🐘 walk!!😍
Lots of love from India🇮🇳....... Long live Australia, God bless you 😇
Thanks mate!!
Awesome
Great to see my old ADFA mate Scotty Egan, well done Wing Commander :)
The ADF downgraded the role of the C27 in July 2021 to humanitarian and emergency response to natural disasters. The aircraft was purchased to fulfill the battlefield airlift role. Going from battlefield airlift to humanitarian roles is a major redefinition in the ADFs operational expectations for this aircraft. For everyone, that does not agree with me, go and do your research!
What the C-27j was acquired to do, transportation of goods and troops, it is doing as intended. It is the battle field protection avionics which was bought as with the US Spartans. Due to the US government not acquiring the full complement of Spartans, they were going to acquire up to 140 aircraft, the battle field protection avionics there are issues over that. The battle field protection avionics can be upgraded. The C-130js are currently being upgraded.
Camomile, instead of talking out your butt (seriously, your post is rubbish), try googling 'fitted for but not with'. Budgets have priorities. Flying C-27s out of Kabul or Khartoum isn't a priority right now, or in the near future.
Word is the Spartans are a bit rubbish so it's no surprise to hear they have been downgraded to essentially civilian roles.
Nessun paese anglosassone acquisterà un aereo ,una nave , un sottomarino che non venga dal Commonwealth o come cavolo si chiama .così è da 100 anni e così sarà.anche se vi costerà il quadruplo.mu risulta che le fregate inglesi vi costeranno 4 miliardi di dollari un pezzo, 4 volte le fremm italiane, e saranno operative nel 2035, quando saranno già vecchie . Voi australiani ragionate così: non ci importa cosa è meglio, non ci importa quanti costa, l importante è acquistare Commonwealth.poi, se c'è la prendiamo in culo, c'è lo prendiamo volentieri l importante è che sia anglosassone.
Proud
now do that with the ~75 f 35a
Is this the squadron next to the defence bank
Wow!
Don't let this display of discipline fool you, these guys are complete hoons! 😉
Nice boys! Go the RAAF!
Thanks Brothership that's a nice sentiment mate 👍
These are Better.
E melhor vocês comprar o KC 390 da Embraer para substituir por essas corrocas ai!
C27 j spartan the Italian flying gunship
The boys
If they are not military capable then we need to modify half the fleet as fire-fighting tankers. US has a certified roll-on system for hercs that could be adjusted for C-27 operations.
The MAFFS system has issues, not least being corrosive to the airframe.
🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹
Incorrect Sir! 38SQN launched 10 C7s simultaneously in 1970. Guess that was before you were born eh!
Be nice if they were equipped for fire fighting
They can be, but there are about 50 other platforms around that do a better job with a quicker turnaround.
👍
SEVEN aircraft? (Tin hats and flak jackets time). When I was serving with 486 SQN. Richmond, we managed to fly, ALL 24 C130 Hercules, of 36 and 37 SQN.
Drove the locals nuts in Richmond, when they returned low over the town in flights of 3, 8 times.
So weird watching a RAAF video with a dodgy 'Indian defence channel' soundtrack...
Oh wow, 7 aircraft take off one after the other. China must be worried. Well done RAAF.
Noice
And they are all underpowered.
Underpowered???? The C-27j is the most powerful twin turboprop military transport aircraft. The latest upgrades, there is an option to have the engines to have an output of 5,100 shp.
@@ctwentysevenj6531 The An-32 had 5000hp engines back in the 1970s.
@@NoTaboos However the c-27j can take a greater load than the AN-32. Plus the RR AE2100D2 engines on the C-27J are lighter more efficient than the ZMKB Progress AI-20DM. Also the C-27j has superior internal dimensions.
@@ctwentysevenj6531 Well, I think we should have bought C-390s.
@@NoTaboos Well if you did you wouldn't be able to land them on small improvised landing strips. That would have been a problem during the Bush fires.
I remember seeing f111s amongst others flying over brissy all the time in the 80s 90s now you see no RAAF aircraft at all. It's sad.
Where as every 15min in Townsville flocks of hornets buzz the town,I know because of the training base and that it's a garrison city.
Please RAAF, please buzz Logan and Brissy a bit more. Yes I'm a RAAF c.ck but who isn't a little deep down.
We get more hooks than cops,more commercial airlines flying over, how about a superhornet 2 ship or f35 pleeeeeease.
baby hercules
G.222 Panda, they first came into service in the late 70s with the Italian air force, the US then got a number of them and called them C-27A Spartans.
So still a Panda despite what the yanks call them
Wrong! The C-27J Spartan has been totally redeveloped from the G-222 or C-27a. With far more powerful engines, modern avionics, stronger fuselage, completely new undercarriage etc.
The US made significant upgrades to the Panda, including a new cockpit, engines, and propellor design from the Hercules, hence it was redesignated the C-27 A Spartan. The C-27 J evolved from experience with the C-27A and the Panda. It is a significantly better aircraft. The C27J Spartan kept the US style designation because it now has significant interoperability with the C-130J platform. Compared to the Panda it has 35% greater range, and 15% higher cruising speed. The RAAF chose the Spartan due to the cargo space is large enough to carry G-Wagons and palletized goods.
@@artistjoh C-27A or G-222 has the Same engines, GE T64D, same propellers , same avionics and cockpit. There were some minor modifications.
@@ctwentysevenj6531bullshit!
That’s not a mass departure! Only one aircraft took off.
Canada made the wrong choice
🤮
Wouldn’t have been click bait if we got to see more than just 1 plane take off. Should be ashamed of yourselves. 7 planes on a runway is not a mass takeoff nor is 1 plane taking off, unless of course you are talking in the absolute literal form of a mass taking off but you weren’t!! Very embarrassing for us Australians if this is the best our armed forces can do, shame on you, shame 👎🏻
Give it a rest Phil, it was a fun little clip.
Clown!
Another aircraft purchased by Defence that can’t do the job it was bought to do. No department wastes money better than Defence. God help us if the ADF actually had to rely on the equipment and platforms that have been purchased that do not perform or cannot fulfill their intended role, in the event the Chinese arrive in our backyard looking for a fight.
what the hell are you talking about? it's a cargo plane, it can carry cargo. also, where are you getting all this bs from?
The Spartan is a great multi role aircraft and it is one of the most capable battlefield airlifters, transport and cargo planes. It is great because it can fit the gap between the chinook and the herc. Get your facts straight before commenting.
@@27852 exactly
The bigger question is, what is the capability it was purchased to deliver? I’m guessing the argument is, the Spartan can’t go everywhere the Caribou could.
Everything u said has no merit or proof of bad purchase.
Another crap purchase, unfit for purpose
Talking nonsense.