ไม่สามารถเล่นวิดีโอนี้
ขออภัยในความไม่สะดวก

SpaceX Starship Test Flight 4 | LIVE

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 5 มิ.ย. 2024
  • The fourth flight test of Starship is targeted to launch Thursday, June 6 from Starbase in Texas. The 120-minute test window opens at 7:00 a.m. CT. The fourth flight test turns our focus from achieving orbit to demonstrating the ability to return and reuse Starship and Super Heavy. The primary objectives will be executing a landing burn and soft splashdown in the Gulf of Mexico with the Super Heavy booster, and achieving a controlled entry of Starship.
    FOLLOW ME ON X:
    x.com/KevinHeh...

ความคิดเห็น • 105

  • @kriscollinstunes
    @kriscollinstunes 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

    Miss seeing you regularly on here so much, Kevin. What a treat today! May God richly bless you and your family, my brother in Christ.

  • @geoffreyrose3327
    @geoffreyrose3327 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    It’s built like an A-10

  • @artyross392
    @artyross392 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Glad to see you in a better mood and laughing. Welcome back!!😊

  • @stuartbrown1677
    @stuartbrown1677 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    I love your commentary ; great fun
    Thank you
    Stuart in Ireland ☘️

  • @caseykaplan5168
    @caseykaplan5168 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    A super wonderful test flight of starship, because the super heavy booster made a soft splashdown in the gulf of Mexico and the starship made a successful reentry into the earth's atmosphere and made a soft splashdown in the Indian Ocean!!!!

  • @shannonrollins2495
    @shannonrollins2495 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I think SpaceX did something different for this flight profile to make the orbital insertion velocity incredibly accurate. If you watch the speed of the Starship at 8 minutes into flight, it has considerably quick acceleration with the 3 sea-level Raptor engines firing alongside the 3 vacuum Raptor engines. At about 8 minutes and 10 seconds the 3 vacuum engines shut down while the sea-level Raptors are still firing. They are less efficient in vacuum and the acceleration is much reduced. This may allow a more precise orbital insertion that will be unique to Starship with it's mix of both sea-level optimized Raptor Engines and vacuum optimized Raptor engines allowing SpaceX to tinker with the engine selection and throttling for extremely precise speeds at engine cut-off.

  • @markhatch1267
    @markhatch1267 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Getting the soft touch down, even with considerable damage, I would say equals a complete success. Hu! Rah! Excited now about the next flight!

  • @clytle374
    @clytle374 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    Glad to see you, That says a whole lot for the flight control software, adapted to at least one severally damaged control surface.

  • @robertburkett3167
    @robertburkett3167 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Love seeing you here & especially on your other channel. God Bless & God speed.... Thanks man!

  • @two2truths
    @two2truths 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What a time to be alive. I just cant imagine, I cant IMAGINE being an individual, especially in the western world, being able to see and witness all this, for FREE, and still sternly deny any of its actually happening... Just throwing the word 'fake' out due to an abject inability to follow the engineering capabilities of our species... Blows my mind.

  • @caseykaplan5168
    @caseykaplan5168 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This test flight went off perfectly!

  • @justinvharper1320
    @justinvharper1320 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    I love you Kevin. Thanks for standing up for Christ!

  • @br8801
    @br8801 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    SpaceX could take a cue from Indycar racing and use a rotating shield over the camera lens...just spin it out of the way when it gets dirty...

  • @Dr_Doyle
    @Dr_Doyle 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    That was so effing awrrresome.

  • @klasiks92
    @klasiks92 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Am back to this video just to relive this moment

  • @matthodel946
    @matthodel946 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Miss you Kevin, love everything you do sir!

  • @SnackPack913
    @SnackPack913 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    They should make some sacrificial lens protectors for the cameras that they can blow off as they get dirty. Have like 3 of them in a stack in front of the camera lol

  • @yourfriendlyneighborhoodin1559
    @yourfriendlyneighborhoodin1559 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Re-entry does start at about 5 miles per second.
    Low orbital velocity 17.5k mph = 4.8 miles per second.

  • @lang1892
    @lang1892 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    you are one of my favorite youtubers

  • @zoigusmaloigus2966
    @zoigusmaloigus2966 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Couldn't watch to the end, I came here for starship not for religion, all the best anyway dude

    • @orlyounotinbaires
      @orlyounotinbaires 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      He has become a fundamentalist, it sucks

  • @secure152
    @secure152 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    Kevin! Good to See You! We Miss you! Get Well Soon!

  • @jaypaint4855
    @jaypaint4855 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This flight made me feel alright about my gravity turns in KSP! What was that massive pitch down?

  • @colegustafson199
    @colegustafson199 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks for the excellent commentary, very enjoyable to watch

  • @patrickunderwood5662
    @patrickunderwood5662 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    DAMN that was an awesome intro.

  • @two2truths
    @two2truths 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Final comment... your arguments are truthfully not as strong as your believe they are... and I say that with all love and respect. Peace brotha ✌

  • @redcoat4348
    @redcoat4348 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    It was great watching the stream with you, hope you get better soon. May God bless you.

  • @alexanderash5490
    @alexanderash5490 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks kevin for showing us the feed
    SHOOTS BROOOO 😂😂

  • @jac0m1n0
    @jac0m1n0 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Excellent INTRO!!

  • @eterpaykugml4751
    @eterpaykugml4751 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    SpaceX needs the Exa-press for punching out Starships and boosters. They also need to make the thermal tiles bigger.

  • @hendriklubbe
    @hendriklubbe 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Hallo van Suid-Afrika. Veels geluk Elon, veels geluk SpaceX. Ongelooflike prestasie. Geweldig trots op jou Elon, jy ROCK!!!!!

    • @Thefreakyfreek
      @Thefreakyfreek 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Lekker bezig man groet vanuit Nederland

    • @vincentcorreia5714
      @vincentcorreia5714 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Beslis Meneer!!

  • @hachan5440
    @hachan5440 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    God bless you and your wife, you're very bold. Stay strong in the faith.

  • @papaslickhead
    @papaslickhead 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Where was the shot from a near by ship near the splash down area.?
    You would think they would be able to show that video.
    Hell they had the landings filmed in the 60's ?

  • @wschmrdr
    @wschmrdr 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Great stream as always; looking forward to your next Bible study on the "KevinHehmeyer" channel.

  • @alkishadjinicolaou5831
    @alkishadjinicolaou5831 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I think next flight in a month. What do you think?

  • @LabPadre
    @LabPadre 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    🤘❤🤘

  • @KenPaulsen13
    @KenPaulsen13 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Thank you for sharing yoru Sunday bible studies on YT! God Bless!

  • @chrisjohnson4666
    @chrisjohnson4666 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Locks like titanium front fins in the future!!!!

  • @icewendigo2320
    @icewendigo2320 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    If they use friction to slow down Starship to land, how will they slow down to land on the Moon?

    • @jasonshrout8921
      @jasonshrout8921 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Pure remote testosterone. Ok, and correctly applied and timed thrust.

    • @icewendigo2320
      @icewendigo2320 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@jasonshrout8921 😁

    • @gaius_enceladus
      @gaius_enceladus 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @icewendigo2320 - Using retro-rockets, the same way it's always been done there.
      There are two Starship designs - one for use around the Earth, one for use around the Moon.
      The Moon one has retro-rockets.

  • @kentslocum
    @kentslocum 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thanks for your testimony! 😊

  • @kriscollinstunes
    @kriscollinstunes 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    28:48 hats off indeed!!

  • @two2truths
    @two2truths 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Also, WHY and HOW does 'objective' moralism exist? And why does it HAVE to come from a 'moral giver'? as you said? Moralism is absolutely subjective, its fickle, it changes from context to context, within most individuals, and there are a thousand ways philosophy can through other methods 'guide' or 'evolve' a moral compass thats not from a 'moral giver', such as an archaic, dogmatic, 2,000 year old book, written by mortal men

  • @enginerdicon2233
    @enginerdicon2233 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Love your streams man. One tiny thing: plz don’t chew gum on the mic, the sound is hard to stomach… lol. Keep doing what you’re doing and being you unapologetically!

  • @YevhenSavchuk
    @YevhenSavchuk 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Came to watch starship, instead listened to a bunch of religious bullshit..🙄

  • @noeschmoe9927
    @noeschmoe9927 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    All praise to our God and KIng, Jesus the Messiah! So blessed to see the 180 change in you, wrought by Him. Glorify Him with all you can.

  • @Wildmanjonobean
    @Wildmanjonobean 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    New Zealand

  • @noeschmoe9927
    @noeschmoe9927 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Its hard to watch anything not about faith anymore, so thanks for keeping this channel up. I've watched your other channel and like it, but will make it a weekly habit now. Many heard the truth, yet again, thanks to your boldness and obedience to God,

  • @pixel690
    @pixel690 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    okay-
    im here for space stuff not theology/religion stuff
    no offense but just kinda putting me off

    • @pixel690
      @pixel690 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      okay i physically cant watch this anymore im sorry

  • @CyberSQUID9000
    @CyberSQUID9000 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    Mate are you OK ?

  • @leestamp2966
    @leestamp2966 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    Dude I used to love your videos back in the day. Watching 10 of this one though reminded me why I stopped. Chewing with your mouth open and interrupting spacex to talk about God 🤔

    • @gardencornrobber
      @gardencornrobber 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      How do you know all that you said? Must be still watching.

  • @shuriken4852
    @shuriken4852 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I do not come to a science centric channel to be lecture about religion, so I'm out!

  • @craigbentz1953
    @craigbentz1953 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    😂 the commentary is awesome. ✝️

  • @patriotfree2917
    @patriotfree2917 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you Kevin, God Bless you.

  • @SnackPack913
    @SnackPack913 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I love how he just mutes the stream and delivers a concise 3 sentence rebuttal to some anti religion comment in the chat 😂

  • @two2truths
    @two2truths 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Which part of god creating us is 'obvious'?? Brother... using the Bible, referencing the Bible, to prove the Bible... is circular reasoning by definition... You cant do that... Apologies. Logic syllogism doesnt work that way.

  • @Odysseuss.
    @Odysseuss. 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Guess it's time to retire my "boom time" mug now eh Kevin?

  • @yourfriendlyneighborhoodin1559
    @yourfriendlyneighborhoodin1559 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Atheist:
    "Thou shalt not speak of religion in public."
    Christian:
    By what standard of moral authority do you issue anyone commands?

  • @karlzen86
    @karlzen86 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    Don't chew gum on livestream!!!

  • @agamemnongames886
    @agamemnongames886 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Trust only in God.

  • @takanara7
    @takanara7 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Ugh, this guy was chewing gum all through the good parts, lol. Really obnoxious to listen too.

  • @jamesaddison81
    @jamesaddison81 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    My favourite part was when you turned the sound off of the spaceX engineers to spout crap about god.

    • @tankourito5419
      @tankourito5419 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Then go to another stream you angry little child.

    • @jasonshrout8921
      @jasonshrout8921 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Crap, you call it. Look, maybe next time, just watch the spacex feed where you can listen to sycophants and narcissists, and ok... flames to your foolish hearts content. No reason to mess with Kevin.

    • @orlyounotinbaires
      @orlyounotinbaires 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@@jasonshrout8921sociopaths and narcissists that are building the future while a fundamentalist just comments on it. 😅

  • @Hermanos22
    @Hermanos22 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    You need help

  • @APECK419
    @APECK419 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +24

    2 types of people in this world. People that believe in Jesus Christ and those who WILL!!

    • @yourfriendlyneighborhoodin1559
      @yourfriendlyneighborhoodin1559 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Allow me to expand the semantic domain in your in your comments section. Words have subtle different meanings, this is their semantic domain.
      I can believe in President Biden, I believe he exists and he is the president of the United States but I do not trust him, or believe his words, or believe in his plans for our nation.
      Believing in Christ words and trusting his plan is the kind of belief that is required for salvation. Trust, faith, and belief have similar meanings and semantic domains.
      From another semantic point of view point of view everyone already believes that Christ exists.
      God ruled out the possibility of actual atheism several times in the Bible. Romans chapter 1, Psalms 14. No one is actually unintelligent enough to "believe" that everything, everywhere is an accident.
      And everyone knows God's requirements for righteous behavior, the conscience He placed in our minds speaks to us at all times.

    • @yourfriendlyneighborhoodin1559
      @yourfriendlyneighborhoodin1559 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Hope that wasn't too much of a word salad. Haven't been sleeping much lately.👍🏻

    • @tankourito5419
      @tankourito5419 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@yourfriendlyneighborhoodin1559 It makes sense. And for sure, 'athiests' do tend to believe in something. They just refuse to believe in something 'man made' because they think themselves intellectually superior to the rest of the world. They usually believe in some unknown 'higher power' that they have absolutely no understanding or knowledge of.
      But throughout human history, they've been countless people like this. They'll die, they'll burn in hell, and they'll be forgotten about for the rest of time. Just like anyone who is gay, they too will burn in hell. People think they can just whisk through life and believe whatever garbage they want to, and that if they're a 'good person' they'll somehow end up in a good place. It would be funny if it wasn't so sad.

    • @Bow-to-the-absurd
      @Bow-to-the-absurd 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Believe what?
      Get a grip of yourself.

    • @TheBestOfSweden
      @TheBestOfSweden 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      What does that have to do with Starship?

  • @jasonshrout8921
    @jasonshrout8921 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Perhaps, spacex could acquire some narrators that dont sound like Kamala harris or the back street boy who likes dudes? Yeah that one. Really awesome hearing you correct the heathens among us. There are so many and it is damned sad. This stuff is a triviality to be sure, still fun to see people applying their trade and allowing us to observe their efforts.

    • @svglorious
      @svglorious 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Agreed, enough of the schoolgirl giggling, “absolutely,s” “incredible’s” and mangling of technical language… I miss Walter Cronkite, Jules Bergman, Frank Reynolds, and Shorty Powers as CapCom… Keep being you, Kevin!

  • @KenPaulsen13
    @KenPaulsen13 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Bead counting (which derives from bede, which in old english means "prayer") is not the focus of the rosary, which is instead on meditating on the mysteries -- all of which come from the bible. The origin is not from budhism or the Tower of Babel, it originally was a pocket full of 150 pebbles (which represent the 150 psalms) so the peasants who couldn't read (or afford books) could participate in prayer (similar to the monks that would pray all 150 psalms) -- originally was The Lord's Prayer. A monk later connected the pebbles (by threading beads) and it evolved further to what we have today. Even the modern rosary was created hundreds of years before protestant denominations were founded -- so the root of all Christian religions include the rosary in their history. But I believe you are right, we are NOT to pray by words, but instead from the heart -- which is what is taught when praying the rosary (and other prayers).

    • @yourfriendlyneighborhoodin1559
      @yourfriendlyneighborhoodin1559 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Read the instructions for prayer from the Savior himself in Matthew 6:7-8 and then repent of using the Rosary.

    • @yourfriendlyneighborhoodin1559
      @yourfriendlyneighborhoodin1559 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Matthew 6:7-8 LSB -
      "7 “And when you are praying, do not use meaningless repetition as the Gentiles do, for they suppose that they will be heard for their many words. 8 “Therefore, do not be like them; for your Father knows what you need before you ask Him."

    • @yourfriendlyneighborhoodin1559
      @yourfriendlyneighborhoodin1559 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Fun fact: every major religion in the world uses "prayer beads" to maintain count of repetitions except Protestant Christianity.

    • @KenPaulsen13
      @KenPaulsen13 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@yourfriendlyneighborhoodin1559 well, you're missing out! It's not the words, but the heart that prays -- we're not in disagreement. Perhaps you should learn the truth about what you judge?

    • @yourfriendlyneighborhoodin1559
      @yourfriendlyneighborhoodin1559 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I can't offer you anything more than scripture.

  • @johnbuchman4854
    @johnbuchman4854 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Kevin, look up Fatima and the Virgin Mary, the Virgin mother of Jesus Christ, fully God and Man--the Word made flesh. And the Rosary.

    • @gardencornrobber
      @gardencornrobber 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes, a documented miracle of the sun witnessed by tens of thousands. What is coming isn't too far out. Satan has reached the top of the church, but he will not prevail.

    • @jasonshrout8921
      @jasonshrout8921 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Catholicism is adjunct to satanism. No one shall talk to the father except through his son. Mary isnt a part of that circle. Christian's dont have rituals either.

  • @SuperBroop
    @SuperBroop 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Spacex is a joke