This is unnecessary processing... You're literally just duplicating it and splitting it up into its bands, there's no point. It's like duplicating a mono track and panning it lol
He's trying to make the bass of the kick louder and get rid of any highs that might've leaked from the song. But yeah, using a shelf and a cut on one EQ might be better, idk.
Kicks are made of the punch transient, middle, and end piece he’s doing that so you can mix the individual frequencies if you need to eq stuff in or out based on the sample. May be too many instruments in the highs so you mix just that frequency
The point is that you want to edit the high end so it decays very quickly, much quicker than the lower bands, which need to decay for longer. The high end of the kick is quite fast and transient where as the low end is where we hear the boomy decay. This method is making it seem that the hi-hat that was once layered with the kick is no longer there because the high decays so quickly that we don’t here the longer decay of the hi hat that was there.
This worked wonders for me. I got a really clean kick! Some tracks have atmos, basses, hi hats etc on top, this just gives more control to cut those elements out
This’s how producers get ‘stuck’ in the process because they’ll do crazy stuff like this instead of looking for or creating a kick that works with the track and they’ll spend hours nit picking frequencies that they think are imperfect and guess what they are imperfect because you took it from another track which probably wasn’t even in the same key if close so look into to kick synths snd save yourself a headache and create your own
when i first started produce/engineer (before youtube was a thing), i spent weeks trying to be creative with outside the box thinking for my productions, then spend months perfecting everything. It was the most fun i've had in my journey on the creative side. but objectively even with the amount of time put in none of those can compare with productions and mixes i could do today which no longer take weeks trying to be "creative" just what works and the fastest route to end result. but i notice i was way more creative when i had no cautionary limitations just chasing an unheard of sound. some till this day i still cant reimagine ....
Depending on the track you may want a slightly different eq or pitch and since it’s probably sampled from a mastered track you’d need some gain reduction/compression to blend with your premastered mix.
You can just cut the sample out of the track in this case, you don’t need do separate it in different frequencies and the stick them toghether again. It’s just a useless process. The kick in this part of the track plays alone and you can pick it as it is bye
No it does not, there is background elements playing and some hats. This way you're removing the parts you don't want in the kick, although this process isn't always foolproof
This is how to mess up the phase of your kick and turn it into a flabby mess those 48db cuts….. 😭 even just 12db can be too much on a kick sometimes. Load an oscilloscope on your kick after doing all that, you’ll see what I mean.
Iv tried to do this but it always comes out funky or out of phase. Could work on sampling vinyl though but if that's the case I'd just take the sample itself
it's does'nt work like that. when you split EQ in this way you will get a big phase modulations especially at the low and mid-low range! Author did'nt show us original kick and kick after. It's doesn't sound the same!
@@nesobre it wasn't fine, you can hear the hi-hat and part of a synth in the background of the kick before he seperates the EQ bands. This tip helps isolate the kick only, whilst maintaining the decay of the sub frequencies. good tip!
When you find part like this. Just cut the kick. No need to do EQ. The kick is only playing, why do al this useless work, its only messing up the kick even more
So your ears don't work at all or something? You don't hear that background lead and the hats? This actually is a good process to sample.. but would probably have some phase issues
@@NOVRE watching this at 4o clock in bed 😉. Ofcourse you can sample like this, but it wont make the stuff go away that you mentioned. Just sample the whole kick get in your DAW and work from there
@91JLovesDisney Agree. He took his favorite sampled kick and made it "uniquely his own". All the complicated, unnecessary processing makes normally boring YT short more exciting.
That’s not the original sound though it’s still got parts of the synths in it why not create kicks yourself we do not sample kicks in this century anymore brother
This is unnecessary processing... You're literally just duplicating it and splitting it up into its bands, there's no point. It's like duplicating a mono track and panning it lol
He's trying to make the bass of the kick louder and get rid of any highs that might've leaked from the song. But yeah, using a shelf and a cut on one EQ might be better, idk.
Kicks are made of the punch transient, middle, and end piece he’s doing that so you can mix the individual frequencies if you need to eq stuff in or out based on the sample. May be too many instruments in the highs so you mix just that frequency
The point is that you want to edit the high end so it decays very quickly, much quicker than the lower bands, which need to decay for longer. The high end of the kick is quite fast and transient where as the low end is where we hear the boomy decay. This method is making it seem that the hi-hat that was once layered with the kick is no longer there because the high decays so quickly that we don’t here the longer decay of the hi hat that was there.
fr
This worked wonders for me. I got a really clean kick! Some tracks have atmos, basses, hi hats etc on top, this just gives more control to cut those elements out
This’s how producers get
‘stuck’ in the process because they’ll do crazy stuff like this instead of looking for or creating a kick that works with the track and they’ll spend hours nit picking frequencies that they think are imperfect and guess what they are imperfect because you took it from another track which probably wasn’t even in the same key if close so look into to kick synths snd save yourself a headache and create your own
when i first started produce/engineer (before youtube was a thing), i spent weeks trying to be creative with outside the box thinking for my productions, then spend months perfecting everything. It was the most fun i've had in my journey on the creative side. but objectively even with the amount of time put in none of those can compare with productions and mixes i could do today which no longer take weeks trying to be "creative" just what works and the fastest route to end result. but i notice i was way more creative when i had no cautionary limitations just chasing an unheard of sound. some till this day i still cant reimagine ....
yea this is already mixing death spiral just on the first fucking instrument
Wow, that’s really interesting. I will try this out in some tracks.
Fl shorts are the best, learned sum new
Is it necessary to process my stolen kick?
Depending on the track you may want a slightly different eq or pitch and since it’s probably sampled from a mastered track you’d need some gain reduction/compression to blend with your premastered mix.
man discovers sampling
Use linear Phase EQ for this if you want to avoid static phase shifts.
You can just cut the sample out of the track in this case, you don’t need do separate it in different frequencies and the stick them toghether again. It’s just a useless process. The kick in this part of the track plays alone and you can pick it as it is bye
same thought
No it does not, there is background elements playing and some hats. This way you're removing the parts you don't want in the kick, although this process isn't always foolproof
@@NOVRE but he filtered the highs back in 😂
Or i put shaperbox3 on it and shape the high and low frequencies to taste, in a fraction of the time
If you want to steal use Shaperbox. You can carve element to detail. But yeah. Don’t steal.
The Dyro method :)
Yeah he's the god
Outstanding
how do you snap the volume on a track/wave (the last action done)??
Im starting to really like this channel
Just use kick2 and make your own, easy way to get what you want
This is how to mess up the phase of your kick and turn it into a flabby mess those 48db cuts….. 😭 even just 12db can be too much on a kick sometimes. Load an oscilloscope on your kick after doing all that, you’ll see what I mean.
this is a horrible tip, phasing issues and all. Just recreate it or use a multiband transient shaper
Hmm just wondering what happens to the phase of the complete sampled kick. Is it similar to the original one? 🤔
A mess that what happens 🤦🏻♂️
How to steal drop pls
But what about the resonance you get when using eq? Especially on the low frwuencies
This guy sounds dutch
he is haha
@@bend5659 lol yea, they are advertising crazy now in the netherlands to sell their course🤣
Iv tried to do this but it always comes out funky or out of phase. Could work on sampling vinyl though but if that's the case I'd just take the sample itself
it's does'nt work like that. when you split EQ in this way you will get a big phase modulations especially at the low and mid-low range! Author did'nt show us original kick and kick after. It's doesn't sound the same!
how did you shorten each bend
There's this snare from a camellia song ghost in the beginning of it, how do I take it out of the track?
Sounds like a pitched up 808
My brother and I layer our kicks to fill in frequencies
what did you do at the end there?
this is confusing, why sepereate the kick when it was fine
Kinda what I was wondering. Why even seperate it in an EQ?
@@imtoast97 I dono bro, this is an example of not always following and thinking for yourself
@@nesobre it wasn't fine, you can hear the hi-hat and part of a synth in the background of the kick before he seperates the EQ bands. This tip helps isolate the kick only, whilst maintaining the decay of the sub frequencies. good tip!
@@rited yeh fair enough i will listen to it again with headphones and see if i can hear it better
Scary af
Silly 🙃 absolutely why
This is a bad idea to use fo that purposes eq without linear mode because of phase shift. In FL better to use freq splitter for it.
Oh come on 😂
Do you master rap music
Why my instrument is missing when I export out the song from fl studio ?
I stole it using the tip from this video.
phasing issues or transient fuckery isn’t worth it
Just use kicks 😅😂😊
how to put each band on FL?
When you find part like this. Just cut the kick. No need to do EQ. The kick is only playing, why do al this useless work, its only messing up the kick even more
So your ears don't work at all or something? You don't hear that background lead and the hats? This actually is a good process to sample.. but would probably have some phase issues
@@NOVRE watching this at 4o clock in bed 😉. Ofcourse you can sample like this, but it wont make the stuff go away that you mentioned.
Just sample the whole kick get in your DAW and work from there
@@branchyapple Exactly - even if there was other stuff playing, processing it like he did won't do a thing 😂
@@91JLovesDisney exactly 🤣
@91JLovesDisney Agree. He took his favorite sampled kick and made it "uniquely his own". All the complicated, unnecessary processing makes normally boring YT short more exciting.
My question is why, though?
Remix
That’s not the original sound though it’s still got parts of the synths in it why not create kicks yourself we do not sample kicks in this century anymore brother
Hallo mede Nederlander
Or make your own, why do you want to steal sounds from other artist ?
🤦🏻♂️
😂😂😂not necessary
Stolen content
no you didnt do shit lmao that is terrible