Looking at problem 3.0, what if after the counterclaim the P impleads a non-diverse third party in a state law claim (say an insurance co), do we look back at the counterclaim or the first claim as for whether it's related? If looking at the counterclaim, would there be SJ for it if the CC itself is only there because of SJ. The latter seems weird becasue you're basically drawing SJ from a claim that has SJ.
Who can move the case forward if the private employer and state judges and the council from the state insurance and the lawyer of the state insurance committed conspiracy against the demandant person who demanded his or her rights who can move forward the case if the conspirator are the state laws 🫵🏻? ?
I LOVE these man! Thank you so much for putting soo much effort into these videos. Im a 1L currently and I'm studying for Civ Pro Final. So helpful.
I'm glad the videos have been helpful! Wishing you the best on your finals! 🙏
I ok
Thank you so much! All of your videos are so helpful. I am preparing for midterm exams and love your videos.
So good! Im a 1L studying for finals and was struggling with understanding supplemental jurisdiction and this really helped me understand!
Bro you are the GOAT where is your law review?
You’re my new professor. You rock bro
love the lectures. money well spent. excited for venue!
Thanks!
Those sighs were real. No one can teach civ pro and be happy to do it lol. Thank you though it was great
Excellent lecture!
You are the best teacher I saw till now, wow
Where are the lessons on Rule 14, 19, 20, and 24 posted?
26:13
I'm struggling with calififornia family law, commissioners holding on to the stipulation to Jurisdiction to Commissioner post judgement....
Can this be applied to a separate new suit to enforce an agreement?
Udairy isn't. Neither is it cool to wait.
Hi…is there a way to appeal this type of decision?
Looking at problem 3.0, what if after the counterclaim the P impleads a non-diverse third party in a state law claim (say an insurance co), do we look back at the counterclaim or the first claim as for whether it's related? If looking at the counterclaim, would there be SJ for it if the CC itself is only there because of SJ. The latter seems weird becasue you're basically drawing SJ from a claim that has SJ.
i have this exact question
Williams Thomas Johnson Michael Robinson Matthew
Who can move the case forward if the private employer and state judges and the council from the state insurance and the lawyer of the state insurance committed conspiracy against the demandant person who demanded his or her rights who can move forward the case if the conspirator are the state laws 🫵🏻? ?