I am extremely glad that your channel is getting noticed by some sponsors. And giving you the means to bring us videos like this and able to test newer products out there. Well done to you and keep up the hard work.
It's nice to see some of the more affordable modern cards like this one being showcased as well. I would find something like a 4090 review boring because it's completely unattainable for the majority of people, and because it's already been done to death by all the big channels.
yeah out of al the tech channels, RGIHD is probably the most under sponsored. Hope that continues to change! Though I also hope he will vet the companies toughly as well.
I'm sure you won't read this, but I have to say thanks. 9 months ago, I was battling cancer, and during my treatment, I binge your videos to help with the pain and side effects, to take my mind off the situation. And I was always looking forward to your videos. Thank you very much. 🔥
I asked Bing Copilot and it said this thing ranges between 22 to 43 FP32 teraflops. To put that into perspective, that makes the RX7600 on equal computational power as the 2002 JAMSTEC Earth Simulator supercomputer which was comprised of several blade servers occupying entire rooms. That's amazing that we've advanced that much technology.
opened youtube with the intention to watch one of your old videos while waiting for a new one to come out you never fail to bring joy to me man thank you ❤
This is more refined 6650xt, it will be great for everyone once it goes down to 199 or less. The only problem I foresee about this card this season is if the RX 6700xt 12gb gets slashed to around 299$ or lower as it will be a no brainer to choose that instead. The RX 6700 10gb is also currently giving this new card a run for its value as I've seen them for as low as 249$ on newegg...
I avoided every other review (even the brazilian ones I trust, since I'm from brazil) because yours is truly amazing and well made, besides you're honest and bring the tests close to the reality. So glad you're this huge now
Powercolor makes some great cards that are really fairly priced. I had a rx 6600 hellhound and it handled cyberpunk at 1080p medium, and stayed cool and quiet. Pretty good for $250 a year ago. I upgraded to a 2080ti a few months ago, and gave the 6600 to my brother, as a trade for the 1650 he was using.
As always amazing content, thank you so much for your hard work. It really means a lot that you are getting recognition for your hard work by large companies since your consistency is unparalleled over the years!
Excellent testing! Thank you so much. Hoping for an RX 7600 XT or 7700 soon. 8GB w 1080 performance is great but I'm more interested in 1440 potential.
8gb 1080p is starting to push it now. I'm hoping next gen they bump them up to 10+gb and have 8gb reserved for the 8500 XT or something. Games and programs are outgrowing 8gb even for 1080p unfortunately
1440p is out of the question with an 8 GB GPU. 1080p is pushing it, today, with an 8 GB GPU. 1080p = 10 GB + 1440p = 12 GB+ 4K = 16 GB+ I should say that some games will probably work just fine at 1440p but, just don't. Get a proper GPU for the resolution you want to play at that has the proper amount of VRAM.
I’m actually glad you have a sponsor too, you need some return on your hard work you’ve done for us and maybe it will help elevate what you can test too 👌
I got this gpu a few days ago. I can say it's amazing, I chose it over the rtx 4060 and I'm very glad to have gotten this, raw performance is a bit better. I really trust the amd engineers and developers to add proper software to this gpu
Very recently bought a PowerColor RX 6600 with this exact design, as they got dirt-cheap with AMD trying to get rid of old stock. For the price, it's a surprisingly quiet and efficient little card, probably a genuine value king at the moment (unless you find an RX 6650XT with a deep discount, which would put almost exactly at RX 7600 performance). :)
For some reason here in mexico, the 6650xt along with the 6600 and the 6700xt all sell between $150 to $300 USD, used of course but they are 1 year old gpus so that's fucking ridiculous considering i bought my brand new pulse 6650xt back in december at $320 with two free games.
@@TheWow1323 I bought the new 6600 for $240, but I've seen one for $210 recently and the retail taxes in Poland are pretty high. No wonder the used ones get crazy cheap if they want to sell at all. :)
Nice to see that i5-12400f really letting that 7600 stretch its legs. What a killer combo! One I may just have to upgrade to... Just not particularly huge on the 8GB frame buffer
8gb SHOULD be enough for 1080p. Game Devs are passing on optimisations too the consumers too brute force. Their games look mediocre but eat 10 gb of vram?
@@loowick4074 100% agree - but we're also talking about 8GB, which has already been around for a long time. It's time now to upgrade these more "mid-range" products to at least 10, ideally 12G of VRAM. In my opinion
@@mikepawlikguitar I wouldn't mind but it's an excuse for companies not too optimise. 8gb should be less for 1440 p but adequate for 1080p. I mean the games don't even look good but demand all your cpu, gpu , vram
Card needs to be $200 to be worth it IMO. The 128-bit bus and PCIE 4.0 8x specs just hurt this card’s value for those with older systems, looking for an upgrade.
Much better off with a really cheap used RX 6600 or an amazing RX 6650 XT - if you hbave PCI-E 4. Otherwise an RX 5600 XT beats the RX 6600 on pci-e 3.
Yeah but when nvidia gets away away with selling about the same thing for 400 why would amd lower the price that much, also 7000 series has dedicated ai hardware so its gonna do more at a later date.
@@cosminmilitaru9920 The RX 5600 XT does not beat the 6600 on PCIe 3.0, the 3.0 FPS on the 6600 XT is 2% (see: TPU tests), the 6600 is similar and is more than 2% faster than the 6600 (also see TPU tests). Also, I own both and only have PCIe 3.0 systems.
Speaking of your sponsorship, I was looking at that exact graphics card on AWD-IT since it's a local to me. Since the RX 580 8GB has really gone down in price though, I'll get one of those first before upgrading to the RX 7600.
I just bought this card, the XFX Speedster Qick 308 version. Glad to see it does quite well at high settings at this resolution which is what I have. Great video, thanks!
The cooler doesn't look like much but consider how small it is. This specific card is actually the most powerful card currently in the ~200mm ITX category. There is a 4060ti that is around the same length, but it's significantly taller, so will likely break compatibility in a lot of cases where this cooler design would make sense. I would love to see a 7700XT close to this size but I don't know if the TDP is too much. In the era of monster coolers, it's easy to underestimate the strengths of sticking strictly to a 2-slot limit.
I really like the performance of the entry level 7600, not for me as I am good for now with my 2060s, but I can see people with a rx 580, 1060, 1660(s), 1650 and even 2060. I am looking forward to the 7600 xt / 7700 / 7700 xt. The 4060ti did not do it for me.
@@HowyDarko it’s actually not very high for gpus. CPUs tend to start getting dangerous around 85c + but gpus are more like 100c. They have much bigger coolers and can get a lot hooter. 85c isn’t really that bad for a dual fan air cooled card
Nice balanced review. As a comparison I purchased a Sapphire RX 580 Pulse 8GB in November 2017 (just before the first GPU mining boom), for £250. Currently Ebuyer are selling the Sapphire RX 7600 Pulse for £260. Watching various TH-cam video's The RX 7600 (current lowest tier card) gives from 100% to 300% more performance than the RX 580 8GB (the then highest tier card), for just an extra £10 note! I think AMD are aiming at RX 500 series and RX 5000 series owners to upgrade to the RX 7600 not last gen higher tier cards which most other reviewers are comparing it to.
@@desanoxia Price is same for 3060 12GB & RX 7600 here in UK @ £260. The RX 7600 at 1080p & 1440p is still on average 10-20% faster than the RTX 3060 tested by Jegs TV over 15 games. Don't think he tested RT just raster performance, personally not interested in RT, so the RX 7600 might be an option for my 2nd PC which currently has the RX 580.
just bought one after watching this video, paired with an ryzen 5 7600x, for 1080p 180hz this card is awsome delivers good & constant performance and not very power hungry always at 50deg and for my usage which is competitive gaming its more than enough. thanks for the awsome benchmark
Great video but the thing you did not mentioned is that the GPU interface is PCIe 4.0 x8 not x16. Yes it only meant for low end monitors for PC users that still play their game titles on 60hz to 100hz monitor. but over all @RandomGaminginHD great video and glad to see that you are picking up good sponsorships for your brand overall sir, great video.
FYI, although you probably know this being a GPU guy, but TAA is really designed for NVIDIA graphics although it works for AMD as well. However, TAA can be a little more demanding on the CPU , When using a AMD graphics like I am now (with my ASRock PG RX 7600) I like to use either MSAA or if I can get a good framerate I would use SSAA. But I have used TAA before when I was using a GTX 1070 Ti. BTW, You are my go to source of info on the performance of GPU's. Keep up the great work! Cheers!
in kingdom come you should download the free hd textures dlc. I run it on my rx6600 and it's pretty good. The dips in KCD are entirely cpu based, however. KCD really hammers one core more than others and it shows when npcs are wandering about.
At this rate we may be seeing you reporting about tech on the showfloors of the next CES or Computex alongside the big techtubers... Keep at it you're doing great!
ah, really nice to see team fortress 2 in these videos as someone who plays on it often but thinks about upgrading & how it would play on different systems.
I wouldn't say it's a bad deal, but amd gpu are pretty prone to getting hefty discounts within just a couple months, so i think I'll hold off and see where prices for the whole stack go
@@ShockingPikachu It depends. But most people I see get a 500w-600w PSU if they're not enthusiast and just a regular gamer. And then there's the people that get 1200w PSUs to flex 🤣
thanks for testing cyberpunk with full crowds! I've needed to upgrade my gpu for blender and was hoping this one would be able to handle cyberpunk in my downtime with better settings.
@@kennethpereyda5707 It won't affect a card at this performance level. Even using it on a pcie gen 3.0 motherboard it should be ok. You only really need x16 on mid range and higher end cards.
Surprised to see Skyrim SE in the benchmarked games, it's one of those games that i still play to this day, so it's interesting to see that getting included
Since you have both cards, and they are both disappointingly only wired for 8 lanes of pci-e, perhaps a video checking the performance degradation of both the 4060ti and 7600 on pci-e 3.0 systems would be good. Odds are your motherboard has a setting to drop to 3.0 speeds. 300/400 chipset Ryzen owners and 10 Gen and back Intel owners are likely to be interested in these cards to keep their systems relevant, as their CPUs are likely still fine.
Ouh fuck for the moment I forgot it's pcie 4!Another big no for me then,except the high price!Guess I stick w 1070 ti for a year and wait for next gen to upgrade the whole system...
G'day Random, I am really liking your Multi Game Benchmark videos with a good mix of older & newer games, it will be great to see some Hero GPUs from the past get a video like this too. Unlike 4060Ti which in pure Raster Performance has barely any increase & a decrease in some games against 3060Ti so effectively the same as last gen unless you only play DLSS3 Games I think the RX7600 is a reasonable buy, compared to last gen you are getting a reasonable upgrade accrding to TechPowerUp GPU DataBase of about 30% to 6650XT/6700XT performance at 10% cheaper than 6600. The biggest problem for 7600 I think is that there are still 6000 GPUs available at very discounted prices so if 7600 & 6700XT are close in price if you go 6700XT you get same core performance but the better memory performance of 12GB & 192Bit Bus
"you are getting a reasonable upgrade accrding to TechPowerUp GPU DataBase of about 30% to 6650XT/6700XT performance" Nope, barely better than a 6650 xt, slower and less vram than a 6700xt which you can often find on sale at slightly higher price.
@@jutube821 Did you open up the bit that says "Read More" ??? because if you had you could have read the whole sentence to get the context, The whole sentence is "compared to last gen you are getting a reasonable upgrade accrding to TechPowerUp GPU DataBase of about 30% to 6650XT/6700XT performance at 10% cheaper than 6600." The 30% performance increase is TO 6650XT/6700XT performance, NOT 30% OVER 6650XT/6700XT performance, then the 10% cheaper is in reference to 6600MSRP. On the GPU DataBase the difference between 7600 & 6700XT is only about 5% which you claim for the same gap between 6650XT & 7600 is "barely better than" also if you had read the rest you would have seen that I did say that because of the current very discounted last Gen prices the 6700XT is a better buy because of the 12GB & 192Bit Bus.
Leave pc gaming it's the end only cloud gaming is our future not pc or gpus . Consumer market will end No laptops no hardware only cloud and phone's our future
I played Shadow Of The Tomb Raider on the One X last night at 4K 30fps, and it runs at 60fps at 1440p. That doesn't say much for these new cards when a near 7 year old card can pull that off at 4K.
i just got a rx 7600 and i have to say i needed a gpu and i only had about £300 and i am very happy yeah its not the best thing since sliced bred but as someone who doesn't play games all day everyday and sticks to 1080p its perfect. i have had problems with kingdom come but i think that's but the game tbh its not exactly the most polished game out there. my old gpu was a rx 5500 xt so its a big upgrade for me the rx 5500 xt was great and tbh still holds its own in 2023 for mid range gaming at 1080p. i do like to stick to AMD when possible as well but that's just me
I've been keen on upgrading my 6600, I thought 7600 would give good competition due the generation leap. Seeing the performance of 7600, I'm not very keen actually. I'd rather upgrade to a 10+ GB VRAM card, something like a 6700 non-XT. But again, I'd rather a 6700 XT to futureproof myself. (I'm a 1080p gamer btw) But 7700 XT is somewhere to be seen in the near future, and that's why I'm holding to buy the 6700 XT too. Hopefully 7700 XT will be announced soon, it'll probably scare Nvidia a lot considering it's price point and performance. AMD usually offers better performance for lower price than Nvidia cards, hope they actually continue to do that in the current generation cards as well.
if you want something futureproof buy a Nvidia GPU, DLSS performance is similar or better than FSR quality. There is a feature of upscaling textures with AI if you dont have enough VRAM to run them natively.
I am in the same boat as you, but I have a 2060 super, although I play older games mixed with some recent ones, still no incentive to buy a new card but the 7700xt is intriguing, I was hoping for the 4060ti but it did disappoint. I am a big fan of DLSS though, it helps a lot in games with bad TAA and also DLDSR, but the Nvidia tax is getting higher and higher, so the value drops
One thing i hate about South Africa is GPU pricing is out of hand, this exact card goes for around $340 if not $330 here, and many more cards suffer from this too, its really annoying, but there are a couple sellers that offer reasonable-ish prices, good luck finding those though.
Your mileage may vary depending on the game, but this card does play games beyond 1080p fairly well. Especially 1440p, a lot of games in 1080p through 1440p go over 100 frames, and if you're fine with 4k not being 60+fps (like between 30 to 55 fps, especially keeping in mind cinema quality is 24 fps) it does that pretty well in a lot of games. Some games don't like resolutions beyond 1080p. The latest forza motorsport is a good example of a game that just craps itself beyond 1080p (forza horizon 5 runs extremely well though) Everything I throw at it usually runs fairly well, especially if I use FSR if the game has the option, and if it doesn't then fluid motion frames helps a great deal of games get better frames. They're getting really good with framegen technology. Such a huge leap from the current drivers vs. the December alpha drivers with framegen. AMD is starting to catch up with Nvidia. These drivers they've released recently are some of the best AMD has ever put out. The 7000 series cards, all of them are extremely powerful cards, even the budget end is still high end, even though this card is lacking in the vram, it still packs a huge wallop especially if you compensate for its lack of vram with huge amounts of system RAM and pair it up with a good 5000 series x3d or a good 7000 series x3d.
I have a suspicion in games where this rdna 3 tech does not seem to scale well against the 6600xt, that when they polish the drivers in 6 months the 7600 will show it is better. That is not saying it will be faster across the board like the 6xxx cards were after the drivers were finally sorted, but the improvements over the 6600xt / 6650 will be consistent.
It's an entry level card that will play every game out at 1080p ultra settings or 1440p with fsr. For some reason youtubers have jumped on this hype train of unless you're playing games at 4k ultra 100 fps like a 4080/4090/7900xtx does, you're having a terrible experience. This thing is under 300 bucks and is a solid performer, you do not need 4k or ultra settings at 120hz to play games, if you want those things, prepare to spend more money.
Looking good - I'd now like to see a comparison (in a few games, not all of them) of this card vs the new RTX 4060Ti to see which would be the better buy for 1080p gamers.
I got a new RX 7600 for $230 US at MicroCenter in the US. I have an LG QHD IPS Nano Display. I couldn't be happier with the value of what this card brings. I'm still trying to wrap my head around the upscaling and how to set it up for more FPS in MW2. I've been team green for about forever but in the US if you get a AMD card you can get Starfield for free. If anyone has any tips to get the most FPS in MW2 with this card lmk.
It might sounds weird, but can you please add a new benchmarking method like Stable Diffusion for every single GPU you reviewed on? I tried searching for GPU comparison for Stable Diffusion, but only few of them doing real-time testing and it's only high end GPU (e.g. RTX 3090 vs RTX 4090)
I'm thankful for you taking the time for us to present thus GPU. However,why do people review latests AMD GPU with intel systems,where the GPU can't benefit all the symbiotic advantages it gets in AMD systems???
Thanks for testing out tf2!!! I've been playing it on integrated graphics (just barely lol) for many years and am about to make the jump to ryzen 5 5600 + rx6700xt and was kinda curious on how it would perform, good to know high settings nets you such high frame rates.
holy, that's a good price. I paid 400 pounds half year ago and I'm more than happy. I hope you too will be happy with your rx 6800 : ) PS: remember to UV your gpu (900 or 925mV), rx 6800 takes 160-180W max after UV.
5700xt vs 7600 on a pcie 3.0 MB would be VERY interesting given the 5700xt is on 256 bit memory and will be almost unhindered at pcie 3.0 vs the 7600 128 bit, I have a 5700xt at present but honestly as im on pcie 3.0 with a 3800xt, the memory bus limitations are giving me pause on a lot of cards.
GPU memory controllers don't use the pcie connection, so the motherboard won't make a difference to memory bandwidth on the cards. You might mean pcie x16 vs x8 on the 5700xt and 7600 respectively? The pcie bus can affect access to DRAM and the CPU, but the onboard memory of the GPU is not affected. A x8 bus on pcie 3.0 is generally enough for most low end or even low/mid range cards. The pcie x4 bus on the rx 6400/6500 cards was a big issue on gen 3.0., but a x8 bus shouldn't make too much difference for something like an RX7600.
@@Pushing_Pixels it makes a difference. quite a big once in a few games. This is because of its 128 bit bus. If the card was with a 256 bit bus it would have double the memory bandwidth which renders the drop from 16x to 8x inert almost. its one of the biggest criticisms of the 4060ti and 7600 is they are limited to 8x, so pcie 3.0 vs 4.0 makes a bigger difference because 8x on pcie 4.0 allows the same bandwidth to pass through per cycle vs pcie 16x on 3.0 understand? So on pcie 4.0 the rx 7600 and 4060ti dont have any issues or many memory limits. but pcie 3.0 users will experiance memory speed limitations due to the tighter restrictions (because the cards 8x limiter), and memory information is transferred over the slot through its interface, so yes it makes a difference. especially with resizeable BAR or SAM
Would like to see more ray tracing benchmarks, maybe Minecraft RT? *edit* somehow I missed the minecraft RT in this video, I can only apologise. In my defence I was watching while also doing housework.
For me, it's about how much fps I can get in my tiny PC for the price. My maximum GPU length is 211mm and I only have a 600 watt PSU, so my options are fairly limited, but significantly less limited than the low profile case I had before. I only have a 1080p 75hz monitor as well, so I see no reason to overdo it with performance, lest I sacrifice the low heat and noise I'm going for. My options for new hardware are the RX 7600, RTX 4060 and RTX 4060 ti The 7600 seems to have the best performance for the price out of all of them, and the reference card will just about fit in my system. It also comes with Starfield for free, I see that as just one more thing that's improving the value of the GPU right now.
Thanks for showing elden ring, that's the main reason I upgraded in the first place my laptop was only getting 60 on all low settings and thats only in certain areas😂
Why do some games have an FPS cap? I have never understood it. Is it to make it more compatible with older hardware? Anyway, an amazing card. Seems to rival the 3070.
For the Form Software engine used in Souls series and Elden Ring, it is said FPS is directly tied to calculations of I-frames, timings of dodging and parry. Releasing the 60 FPS cap may mess up gameplay all together.
It's easier to avoid bugs with a FPS cap on engine. One problem is physics going wonky. Ragdolls and items flying all over the place. Second problem is cutscene triggers that might malfunction if the FPS is all over the place, meaning your game gets stuck and you can't proceed with the story.
The difference between this and the RX 6600 is small and the drivers are kind of bad now for the RX 7600. I tested this on my channel and i was not impressed at all...
6600 vs 7600 faceoff maybe? I was looking for an upgrade in the X600 tier's price range, but I took a look at the price/performance of the 7600 and decided there and then to just buy a 6600 because it was 100€ less and the performance was satisfying. It would be interesting to see a straight comparison between the two to see how much extra performance 100€ gets you in real life scenarios.
@@rustywastakenwastaken I'm not a 6600 user just yet, the GPU hasn't been delivered...still on a GTX 970 for now, but in the near future I'll be back on an AMD GPU as I have for most of my life
I am extremely glad that your channel is getting noticed by some sponsors. And giving you the means to bring us videos like this and able to test newer products out there. Well done to you and keep up the hard work.
Thank you!
For sure I really do love it. I hope more sponsors are able to reach out.
It's nice to see some of the more affordable modern cards like this one being showcased as well. I would find something like a 4090 review boring because it's completely unattainable for the majority of people, and because it's already been done to death by all the big channels.
yeah out of al the tech channels, RGIHD is probably the most under sponsored. Hope that continues to change! Though I also hope he will vet the companies toughly as well.
Aye!
I've always loved the subdued and minimal looks of Radeon cards
Yeah same
Especially Powercolor, Palit, Gainward.. when they don't mess with huge branding fonts and stupid names like Hellhound or Devil something
Don't you want it to look like a JET FIGHTER
@@amehu Yeah, not a fan of spaceship looking things, i.e the typical "gamer esthetic". I'm 37, not 13.
They still look really nice. The lack of a unicorn disco is appreciated too 😂
I'm sure you won't read this, but I have to say thanks. 9 months ago, I was battling cancer, and during my treatment, I binge your videos to help with the pain and side effects, to take my mind off the situation. And I was always looking forward to your videos. Thank you very much. 🔥
I hope you're well and getting better friend
Hey bro you doing well
Are you better now bud
@@JesManVPi mean he's alive because he posted last month
❤
I asked Bing Copilot and it said this thing ranges between 22 to 43 FP32 teraflops. To put that into perspective, that makes the RX7600 on equal computational power as the 2002 JAMSTEC Earth Simulator supercomputer which was comprised of several blade servers occupying entire rooms. That's amazing that we've advanced that much technology.
These videos must take a lot of hours to make, really appreciate the effort!
I just bought a powercolor 6700XT, also like the design :)
A comparison with the 5700XT I think would be interesting as that, although the highest AMD Model at the time was seen as a mid range card
Yeah good idea
that was what i was thinking, it's also 8GB and a looooot cheaper to find used, especially compared to nvidia counterparts like 3060
5700xt will eat this one like nothing.
@@madmartigan9720 7600 is faster than 5700xt
@@RandomGaminginHD Maybe a RX580 too :)
opened youtube with the intention to watch one of your old videos while waiting for a new one to come out
you never fail to bring joy to me man
thank you
❤
This is more refined 6650xt, it will be great for everyone once it goes down to 199 or less. The only problem I foresee about this card this season is if the RX 6700xt 12gb gets slashed to around 299$ or lower as it will be a no brainer to choose that instead. The RX 6700 10gb is also currently giving this new card a run for its value as I've seen them for as low as 249$ on newegg...
As of now you can get this for 235$. But I do agree that 6700xt is a better choice, more performance and 12gb vram.
I avoided every other review (even the brazilian ones I trust, since I'm from brazil) because yours is truly amazing and well made, besides you're honest and bring the tests close to the reality. So glad you're this huge now
mandou o papo meu querido!
Boa
Powercolor makes some great cards that are really fairly priced. I had a rx 6600 hellhound and it handled cyberpunk at 1080p medium, and stayed cool and quiet. Pretty good for $250 a year ago. I upgraded to a 2080ti a few months ago, and gave the 6600 to my brother, as a trade for the 1650 he was using.
Plus Red Devil as premium cards
does the 2080ti perform actually better?
@@intifadayuri 2080ti is way faster than a 6600 it’s basically 3060ti performance with way less powerful rt
@@AstralKits way more vram
@@ariesleo7396 tbh I mistakenly thought the 2080ti had 8gb T-T
Thanks for the video
As always amazing content, thank you so much for your hard work. It really means a lot that you are getting recognition for your hard work by large companies since your consistency is unparalleled over the years!
Great Gpu for the budget end, just wish it was around 190£
Yeah I agree, there's 0 point of buying this over a rx 6650xt considering that they're cheaper...
Yeah hopefully will see a drop in price over the coming months
@28thMagicKing I got one of those for like 230 a few months ago... definitely an amazing deal
I am. REALLY HAPPY that you are doing this in a garden and not LED room like everyone else..
Nice to see that your channel got sponsored! I will probably get my next PC case from AWD-IT as they are the cheapest for the one i need :D
Excellent testing! Thank you so much. Hoping for an RX 7600 XT or 7700 soon. 8GB w 1080 performance is great but I'm more interested in 1440 potential.
8gb 1080p is starting to push it now. I'm hoping next gen they bump them up to 10+gb and have 8gb reserved for the 8500 XT or something. Games and programs are outgrowing 8gb even for 1080p unfortunately
1440p is out of the question with an 8 GB GPU.
1080p is pushing it, today, with an 8 GB GPU.
1080p = 10 GB +
1440p = 12 GB+
4K = 16 GB+
I should say that some games will probably work just fine at 1440p but, just don't. Get a proper GPU for the resolution you want to play at that has the proper amount of VRAM.
I'd like to make a suggestion. Could you add with your benchmarks the highest temperature that it reaches during a game?
You didn’t see the heart felt message one of your fans left you on your video ?? You helped him through cancer !
I’m actually glad you have a sponsor too, you need some return on your hard work you’ve done for us and maybe it will help elevate what you can test too 👌
I got this gpu a few days ago. I can say it's amazing, I chose it over the rtx 4060 and I'm very glad to have gotten this, raw performance is a bit better. I really trust the amd engineers and developers to add proper software to this gpu
That is pure dedication.
😁
Very recently bought a PowerColor RX 6600 with this exact design, as they got dirt-cheap with AMD trying to get rid of old stock. For the price, it's a surprisingly quiet and efficient little card, probably a genuine value king at the moment (unless you find an RX 6650XT with a deep discount, which would put almost exactly at RX 7600 performance). :)
Nice :) the 6600 is a great deal right now
got a used refurbished rx 6700 xt for 330 in the eu, only like 20 eur more for what the 7600 sells for
Same. I got one for $140
used of course, but perfectly clean card.
For some reason here in mexico, the 6650xt along with the 6600 and the 6700xt all sell between $150 to $300 USD, used of course but they are 1 year old gpus so that's fucking ridiculous considering i bought my brand new pulse 6650xt back in december at $320 with two free games.
@@TheWow1323 I bought the new 6600 for $240, but I've seen one for $210 recently and the retail taxes in Poland are pretty high. No wonder the used ones get crazy cheap if they want to sell at all. :)
Thanks for the amazing review! Also for a limited time
Customers who order this graphics card can claim a free copy of Resident Evil 4.
I might be late but Congrats on 500K subs RGinHD! halfway to 1Mil
Nice to see that i5-12400f really letting that 7600 stretch its legs. What a killer combo! One I may just have to upgrade to... Just not particularly huge on the 8GB frame buffer
8gb SHOULD be enough for 1080p.
Game Devs are passing on optimisations too the consumers too brute force.
Their games look mediocre but eat 10 gb of vram?
rx7600 isn't fast enough to make a 12400 sweat
@@loowick4074 100% agree - but we're also talking about 8GB, which has already been around for a long time. It's time now to upgrade these more "mid-range" products to at least 10, ideally 12G of VRAM. In my opinion
@@mikepawlikguitar I wouldn't mind but it's an excuse for companies not too optimise.
8gb should be less for 1440 p but adequate for 1080p.
I mean the games don't even look good but demand all your cpu, gpu , vram
@@loowick4074 you're right. It does kind of make you question where their priorities are at.
Man, i'm impressed with the temperatures and also, this is a really good card!
Card needs to be $200 to be worth it IMO. The 128-bit bus and PCIE 4.0 8x specs just hurt this card’s value for those with older systems, looking for an upgrade.
Yeah would like to see it drop in price for sure
Much better off with a really cheap used RX 6600 or an amazing RX 6650 XT - if you hbave PCI-E 4. Otherwise an RX 5600 XT beats the RX 6600 on pci-e 3.
Yeah but when nvidia gets away away with selling about the same thing for 400 why would amd lower the price that much, also 7000 series has dedicated ai hardware so its gonna do more at a later date.
@@cosminmilitaru9920 The RX 5600 XT does not beat the 6600 on PCIe 3.0, the 3.0 FPS on the 6600 XT is 2% (see: TPU tests), the 6600 is similar and is more than 2% faster than the 6600 (also see TPU tests). Also, I own both and only have PCIe 3.0 systems.
6700XT was just on sale on Newegg for $320. Hell of a card for the price and better than the more expensive RTX3060 in most cases
Got one for $230 used on ebay a few weeks ago. Easily plays all my games at 1440p ultra at over 60fps.
you mean rtx3060ti?
@@Tonyx.yt. no I meant exactly what I said.
@@SmithBeatZ1 of course rx6700xt its better, basically everytime and on average even with RT enable
@@SmithBeatZ1 the 6700xt even out performs the 3070 in some games.
One of the most genuine and humble channels
Speaking of your sponsorship, I was looking at that exact graphics card on AWD-IT since it's a local to me. Since the RX 580 8GB has really gone down in price though, I'll get one of those first before upgrading to the RX 7600.
I just bought this card, the XFX Speedster Qick 308 version.
Glad to see it does quite well at high settings at this resolution which is what I have. Great video, thanks!
What are the temps with the 308 ? And does it have any driver issues?
The cooler doesn't look like much but consider how small it is. This specific card is actually the most powerful card currently in the ~200mm ITX category. There is a 4060ti that is around the same length, but it's significantly taller, so will likely break compatibility in a lot of cases where this cooler design would make sense. I would love to see a 7700XT close to this size but I don't know if the TDP is too much. In the era of monster coolers, it's easy to underestimate the strengths of sticking strictly to a 2-slot limit.
I really like the performance of the entry level 7600, not for me as I am good for now with my 2060s, but I can see people with a rx 580, 1060, 1660(s), 1650 and even 2060. I am looking forward to the 7600 xt / 7700 / 7700 xt. The 4060ti did not do it for me.
Just picked up this exact card. I love it! HUGE upgrade from my 750 ti
What temperatures you usually get?
@@HowyDarko below 85c I believe the highest I recorded was like 83c or maybe only 73c but I have a hard time believing that
@@titustech337 that’s high a little bit.. thanks for taking the time and replying
@@HowyDarko it’s actually not very high for gpus. CPUs tend to start getting dangerous around 85c + but gpus are more like 100c. They have much bigger coolers and can get a lot hooter. 85c isn’t really that bad for a dual fan air cooled card
Nice balanced review. As a comparison I purchased a Sapphire RX 580 Pulse 8GB in November 2017 (just before the first GPU mining boom), for £250. Currently Ebuyer are selling the Sapphire RX 7600 Pulse for £260. Watching various TH-cam video's The RX 7600 (current lowest tier card) gives from 100% to 300% more performance than the RX 580 8GB (the then highest tier card), for just an extra £10 note! I think AMD are aiming at RX 500 series and RX 5000 series owners to upgrade to the RX 7600 not last gen higher tier cards which most other reviewers are comparing it to.
You'd be better off spending a little more for a 3060 and have something that will last just as long, if not longer than your 580
@@desanoxia Price is same for 3060 12GB & RX 7600 here in UK @ £260. The RX 7600 at 1080p & 1440p is still on average 10-20% faster than the RTX 3060 tested by Jegs TV over 15 games. Don't think he tested RT just raster performance, personally not interested in RT, so the RX 7600 might be an option for my 2nd PC which currently has the RX 580.
just bought one after watching this video, paired with an ryzen 5 7600x, for 1080p 180hz this card is awsome delivers good & constant performance and not very power hungry always at 50deg
and for my usage which is competitive gaming its more than enough. thanks for the awsome benchmark
😃Love this video, I am 77 years old and have built a dozen pcs, always great content!
Awesome, thank you for watching :)
Would like to see it tested in some older systems like the alienware, I’ve heard amd gpus perform better with weaker cpus than nvidia
It's because AMD cards have physical hardware to do work that nvidia cards offload to the cpu.
@@ffwast which is what known as "driver overhead"
Great video but the thing you did not mentioned is that the GPU interface is PCIe 4.0 x8 not x16. Yes it only meant for low end monitors for PC users that still play their game titles on 60hz to 100hz monitor. but over all @RandomGaminginHD great video and glad to see that you are picking up good sponsorships for your brand overall sir, great video.
FYI, although you probably know this being a GPU guy, but TAA is really designed for NVIDIA graphics although it works for AMD as well. However, TAA can be a little more demanding on the CPU , When using a AMD graphics like I am now (with my ASRock PG RX 7600) I like to use either MSAA or if I can get a good framerate I would use SSAA. But I have used TAA before when I was using a GTX 1070 Ti. BTW, You are my go to source of info on the performance of GPU's. Keep up the great work! Cheers!
in kingdom come you should download the free hd textures dlc. I run it on my rx6600 and it's pretty good. The dips in KCD are entirely cpu based, however. KCD really hammers one core more than others and it shows when npcs are wandering about.
The title with Background grass looks awesome ❣️ with Awesome content❤❤
At this rate we may be seeing you reporting about tech on the showfloors of the next CES or Computex alongside the big techtubers... Keep at it you're doing great!
Looks like an interesting card, but im still more than satisfied with my 6600 xt 👍🏻😊
Agree my 6650xt still delivers high performance even in BF2042 with all settings in low i get an average of 180fps and the 1% lows are arround 150fps
My 6600 is doing me well
Yeah 6600xt is more than enough for 1080p
This card would be an exceptional upgrade if you were upgrading from rdna 1 or much older system tho
@@dafaqu694 and if you are, the RX6700 isn't much more and is a lot better... hell the 6700 is cheaper here 😅
ah, really nice to see team fortress 2 in these videos as someone who plays on it often but thinks about upgrading & how it would play on different systems.
I wouldn't say it's a bad deal, but amd gpu are pretty prone to getting hefty discounts within just a couple months, so i think I'll hold off and see where prices for the whole stack go
Wouldn't say the 7600 is a bad deal at all... but man the 6700XT at a similar price is just a better deal 😅
@@ShockingPikachu but it will lead to a PSU upgrade
@@TheRealMikeMichaels not necessarily. Most people buy a PSU that's overspec for their system by a decent margin
@@ShockingPikachu It depends. But most people I see get a 500w-600w PSU if they're not enthusiast and just a regular gamer.
And then there's the people that get 1200w PSUs to flex 🤣
This is a lot of work but if we had chapters we could use this in the future for specific games
Because of the 8gb I would still go for a 6700xt. The card has more VRAM and performs just a good with a similar price.
thanks for testing cyberpunk with full crowds! I've needed to upgrade my gpu for blender and was hoping this one would be able to handle cyberpunk in my downtime with better settings.
Great 1080p card, i assume it should perform +- the same as a RX 6700 (non xt).
But the RX 6700 has 2GB more VRAM. 🙂
Also is larger and needs more power and runs hotter, it should of had 10 but most likely the XT version will get 10.
But only 8 lanes on the PCI 4.0 x 8 it will be limited
@@kennethpereyda5707 It won't affect a card at this performance level. Even using it on a pcie gen 3.0 motherboard it should be ok. You only really need x16 on mid range and higher end cards.
@@Pushing_Pixels The AMD crowd was saying it would affect the 4060 Ti, I was just stating the same thing for the 7600
Surprised to see Skyrim SE in the benchmarked games, it's one of those games that i still play to this day, so it's interesting to see that getting included
Since you have both cards, and they are both disappointingly only wired for 8 lanes of pci-e, perhaps a video checking the performance degradation of both the 4060ti and 7600 on pci-e 3.0 systems would be good. Odds are your motherboard has a setting to drop to 3.0 speeds. 300/400 chipset Ryzen owners and 10 Gen and back Intel owners are likely to be interested in these cards to keep their systems relevant, as their CPUs are likely still fine.
Ouh fuck for the moment I forgot it's pcie 4!Another big no for me then,except the high price!Guess I stick w 1070 ti for a year and wait for next gen to upgrade the whole system...
There is a 7600 specific driver available now from AMD
G'day Random,
I am really liking your Multi Game Benchmark videos with a good mix of older & newer games, it will be great to see some Hero GPUs from the past get a video like this too.
Unlike 4060Ti which in pure Raster Performance has barely any increase & a decrease in some games against 3060Ti so effectively the same as last gen unless you only play DLSS3 Games I think the RX7600 is a reasonable buy, compared to last gen you are getting a reasonable upgrade accrding to TechPowerUp GPU DataBase of about 30% to 6650XT/6700XT performance at 10% cheaper than 6600.
The biggest problem for 7600 I think is that there are still 6000 GPUs available at very discounted prices so if 7600 & 6700XT are close in price if you go 6700XT you get same core performance but the better memory performance of 12GB & 192Bit Bus
"you are getting a reasonable upgrade accrding to TechPowerUp GPU DataBase of about 30% to 6650XT/6700XT performance"
Nope, barely better than a 6650 xt, slower and less vram than a 6700xt which you can often find on sale at slightly higher price.
@@jutube821 Did you open up the bit that says "Read More" ???
because if you had you could have read the whole sentence to get the context,
The whole sentence is "compared to last gen you are getting a reasonable upgrade accrding to TechPowerUp GPU DataBase of about 30% to 6650XT/6700XT performance at 10% cheaper than 6600." The 30% performance increase is TO 6650XT/6700XT performance, NOT 30% OVER 6650XT/6700XT performance, then the 10% cheaper is in reference to 6600MSRP.
On the GPU DataBase the difference between 7600 & 6700XT is only about 5% which you claim for the same gap between 6650XT & 7600 is "barely better than"
also if you had read the rest you would have seen that I did say that because of the current very discounted last Gen prices the 6700XT is a better buy because of the 12GB & 192Bit Bus.
crazy how it performs close to or on par with a 3060 Ti and around here its almost $200 cheaper than the lowest priced 3060 Ti
TF2, on an rtx 3050 laptop, struggles sometimes. thank you for adding it to the list of games.
great card i am very happy with it (my last card was a GTX 1660) its a vast improvement.
I think an appropriate tl;dw for this would be "Go ahead and crank the settings at 1080p as high as you can go without RTX on most games."
Finally getting sponcers ✊
Powercolor make good cooling on gpu's
Leave pc gaming it's the end only cloud gaming is our future not pc or gpus . Consumer market will end No laptops no hardware only cloud and phone's our future
this is great, thank you for this!! I wonder how it will do with streaming, hopefully AV1 performance holds up.
Should have testing at 1440p too as despite the hoopla when the card was released, it looks a quite strong 1080p card.
I played Shadow Of The Tomb Raider on the One X last night at 4K 30fps, and it runs at 60fps at 1440p. That doesn't say much for these new cards when a near 7 year old card can pull that off at 4K.
nice video! just got my i5 12400f :)
i just got a rx 7600 and i have to say i needed a gpu and i only had about £300 and i am very happy yeah its not the best thing since sliced bred but as someone who doesn't play games all day everyday and sticks to 1080p its perfect. i have had problems with kingdom come but i think that's but the game tbh its not exactly the most polished game out there. my old gpu was a rx 5500 xt so its a big upgrade for me the rx 5500 xt was great and tbh still holds its own in 2023 for mid range gaming at 1080p. i do like to stick to AMD when possible as well but that's just me
Great video as always.
I've been keen on upgrading my 6600, I thought 7600 would give good competition due the generation leap.
Seeing the performance of 7600, I'm not very keen actually.
I'd rather upgrade to a 10+ GB VRAM card, something like a 6700 non-XT.
But again, I'd rather a 6700 XT to futureproof myself. (I'm a 1080p gamer btw)
But 7700 XT is somewhere to be seen in the near future, and that's why I'm holding to buy the 6700 XT too.
Hopefully 7700 XT will be announced soon, it'll probably scare Nvidia a lot considering it's price point and performance.
AMD usually offers better performance for lower price than Nvidia cards, hope they actually continue to do that in the current generation cards as well.
if you want something futureproof buy a Nvidia GPU, DLSS performance is similar or better than FSR quality. There is a feature of upscaling textures with AI if you dont have enough VRAM to run them natively.
Wait another generation as its not that big of an upgrade, imo
I am in the same boat as you, but I have a 2060 super, although I play older games mixed with some recent ones, still no incentive to buy a new card but the 7700xt is intriguing, I was hoping for the 4060ti but it did disappoint. I am a big fan of DLSS though, it helps a lot in games with bad TAA and also DLDSR, but the Nvidia tax is getting higher and higher, so the value drops
Everyone apparently jumped at the RX 6700 XTs as they are best price/performance + futureproof. Also quite cheap for some RTX 3080 equivallents.
6750xt is a really good card
One thing i hate about South Africa is GPU pricing is out of hand, this exact card goes for around $340 if not $330 here, and many more cards suffer from this too, its really annoying, but there are a couple sellers that offer reasonable-ish prices, good luck finding those though.
Aight Imma just get Rx 6700 XT they're the same price with one has more vram and more performance.
Great choice
Your mileage may vary depending on the game, but this card does play games beyond 1080p fairly well. Especially 1440p, a lot of games in 1080p through 1440p go over 100 frames, and if you're fine with 4k not being 60+fps (like between 30 to 55 fps, especially keeping in mind cinema quality is 24 fps) it does that pretty well in a lot of games. Some games don't like resolutions beyond 1080p. The latest forza motorsport is a good example of a game that just craps itself beyond 1080p (forza horizon 5 runs extremely well though) Everything I throw at it usually runs fairly well, especially if I use FSR if the game has the option, and if it doesn't then fluid motion frames helps a great deal of games get better frames. They're getting really good with framegen technology. Such a huge leap from the current drivers vs. the December alpha drivers with framegen. AMD is starting to catch up with Nvidia. These drivers they've released recently are some of the best AMD has ever put out. The 7000 series cards, all of them are extremely powerful cards, even the budget end is still high end, even though this card is lacking in the vram, it still packs a huge wallop especially if you compensate for its lack of vram with huge amounts of system RAM and pair it up with a good 5000 series x3d or a good 7000 series x3d.
First lower end card that makes sense to buy new since the 5700xt and it seems to be a fairly solid upgrade from that card.
Power Color!!!! Providing you with color.
Also, this card plays Sons of the Forest at 5k with FSR3 at a solid 30fps no stutter with a Ryzen 7 5700x3d.
Cant wait till the 1440p benchmarks come out too!
Would be great if you include the fan RPM so that people can figure out how loud the GPU will be.
I have a suspicion in games where this rdna 3 tech does not seem to scale well against the 6600xt, that when they polish the drivers in 6 months the 7600 will show it is better.
That is not saying it will be faster across the board like the 6xxx cards were after the drivers were finally sorted, but the improvements over the 6600xt / 6650 will be consistent.
The AMD in the AMD Rx 7600 stands for "A mad decision".
Why is AMD trying to be like nVidia with that 8GB VRAM?
It's quite an entry level card, if not an actual entry level card.
It's an entry level card that will play every game out at 1080p ultra settings or 1440p with fsr. For some reason youtubers have jumped on this hype train of unless you're playing games at 4k ultra 100 fps like a 4080/4090/7900xtx does, you're having a terrible experience. This thing is under 300 bucks and is a solid performer, you do not need 4k or ultra settings at 120hz to play games, if you want those things, prepare to spend more money.
@@cosminmilitaru9920 $270 is entry level now? entry level is 50 class cards
Looking good - I'd now like to see a comparison (in a few games, not all of them) of this card vs the new RTX 4060Ti to see which would be the better buy for 1080p gamers.
I got a new RX 7600 for $230 US at MicroCenter in the US. I have an LG QHD IPS Nano Display. I couldn't be happier with the value of what this card brings. I'm still trying to wrap my head around the upscaling and how to set it up for more FPS in MW2. I've been team green for about forever but in the US if you get a AMD card you can get Starfield for free. If anyone has any tips to get the most FPS in MW2 with this card lmk.
Our boy is back… Again!
Crazy thing is this card is still faster than A770 lmfao this is literally the cheapest AV1 card you can get with good performance.
It might sounds weird, but can you please add a new benchmarking method like Stable Diffusion for every single GPU you reviewed on? I tried searching for GPU comparison for Stable Diffusion, but only few of them doing real-time testing and it's only high end GPU (e.g. RTX 3090 vs RTX 4090)
It would be cool to see a 1440p benchmark for this card too
I was planning to wait for that card. Glad i couldnt wait and bought a RX 6750xt instead.
I'm thankful for you taking the time for us to present thus GPU.
However,why do people review latests AMD GPU with intel systems,where the GPU can't benefit all the symbiotic advantages it gets in AMD systems???
Finally, you said it out loud. You do indeed _love_ Saints Row! ❤
😂
Thanks for testing out tf2!!! I've been playing it on integrated graphics (just barely lol) for many years and am about to make the jump to ryzen 5 5600 + rx6700xt and was kinda curious on how it would perform, good to know high settings nets you such high frame rates.
Decent card. Okay performance and value. This might be something good for someone to upgrade to, if they have an RX 580 or 1050ti.
massive bump in performance from my 1660
Have you tried reviewing those AliExpress refurbs where they take ex-miners and solder them chips to a new board?
I have a rx 6800 on the way, I paid 280 pounds for it, and I can not wait to play with it :)
holy, that's a good price. I paid 400 pounds half year ago and I'm more than happy. I hope you too will be happy with your rx 6800 : )
PS: remember to UV your gpu (900 or 925mV), rx 6800 takes 160-180W max after UV.
Impressive gpu. Please support AMD and Intel gpus, otherwise Nvidia will create a monopoly!
Not a fair comparison, this is clearly a 4k max ray tracing capable gpu.
I've bought the Sapphire one before watching this and I believe I made a good purchase. Now I must upgrade that 3000g (bottleneck is insane).
Yeah you should get 3600 or 5600
5700xt vs 7600 on a pcie 3.0 MB would be VERY interesting given the 5700xt is on 256 bit memory and will be almost unhindered at pcie 3.0 vs the 7600 128 bit, I have a 5700xt at present but honestly as im on pcie 3.0 with a 3800xt, the memory bus limitations are giving me pause on a lot of cards.
GPU memory controllers don't use the pcie connection, so the motherboard won't make a difference to memory bandwidth on the cards. You might mean pcie x16 vs x8 on the 5700xt and 7600 respectively? The pcie bus can affect access to DRAM and the CPU, but the onboard memory of the GPU is not affected. A x8 bus on pcie 3.0 is generally enough for most low end or even low/mid range cards. The pcie x4 bus on the rx 6400/6500 cards was a big issue on gen 3.0., but a x8 bus shouldn't make too much difference for something like an RX7600.
@@Pushing_Pixels it makes a difference. quite a big once in a few games. This is because of its 128 bit bus. If the card was with a 256 bit bus it would have double the memory bandwidth which renders the drop from 16x to 8x inert almost. its one of the biggest criticisms of the 4060ti and 7600 is they are limited to 8x, so pcie 3.0 vs 4.0 makes a bigger difference because 8x on pcie 4.0 allows the same bandwidth to pass through per cycle vs pcie 16x on 3.0 understand? So on pcie 4.0 the rx 7600 and 4060ti dont have any issues or many memory limits. but pcie 3.0 users will experiance memory speed limitations due to the tighter restrictions (because the cards 8x limiter), and memory information is transferred over the slot through its interface, so yes it makes a difference. especially with resizeable BAR or SAM
Would like to see more ray tracing benchmarks, maybe Minecraft RT? *edit* somehow I missed the minecraft RT in this video, I can only apologise. In my defence I was watching while also doing housework.
Why would he do that for this tier of card?RT is a 8/9 feature,even Nvidia delivers shit in their 6s.
Tbh I think this channel is going down to road of HUB and Daniel Owen, VS GN and DF. I could be wrong on this one, but I dont think so.
@@naamadossantossilva4736 because I got one would be interested to see the results.
@Mahesh apologies, edited my reply to explain.
@@desktopstu4145 You saw them,they were shit.RT will maybe get usable in the 6060/9600XT.
For me, it's about how much fps I can get in my tiny PC for the price.
My maximum GPU length is 211mm and I only have a 600 watt PSU, so my options are fairly limited, but significantly less limited than the low profile case I had before.
I only have a 1080p 75hz monitor as well, so I see no reason to overdo it with performance, lest I sacrifice the low heat and noise I'm going for.
My options for new hardware are the RX 7600, RTX 4060 and RTX 4060 ti
The 7600 seems to have the best performance for the price out of all of them, and the reference card will just about fit in my system.
It also comes with Starfield for free, I see that as just one more thing that's improving the value of the GPU right now.
go for AMD
Thanks for showing elden ring, that's the main reason I upgraded in the first place my laptop was only getting 60 on all low settings and thats only in certain areas😂
Why do some games have an FPS cap? I have never understood it. Is it to make it more compatible with older hardware? Anyway, an amazing card. Seems to rival the 3070.
Console ports. Physics simulation.
For the Form Software engine used in Souls series and Elden Ring, it is said FPS is directly tied to calculations of I-frames, timings of dodging and parry. Releasing the 60 FPS cap may mess up gameplay all together.
It's easier to avoid bugs with a FPS cap on engine.
One problem is physics going wonky. Ragdolls and items flying all over the place.
Second problem is cutscene triggers that might malfunction if the FPS is all over the place, meaning your game gets stuck and you can't proceed with the story.
@@noway8662 makes sense, thanks.
The difference between this and the RX 6600 is small and the drivers are kind of bad now for the RX 7600. I tested this on my channel and i was not impressed at all...
6600 vs 7600 faceoff maybe? I was looking for an upgrade in the X600 tier's price range, but I took a look at the price/performance of the 7600 and decided there and then to just buy a 6600 because it was 100€ less and the performance was satisfying. It would be interesting to see a straight comparison between the two to see how much extra performance 100€ gets you in real life scenarios.
probably only like 5 - 15fps more in most scenarios
also fellow 6600 user haiiiii
@@rustywastakenwastaken we congregate!
@@rustywastakenwastaken The 7600 is about 30% faster than a 6600, so it's a pretty solid difference.
@@rustywastakenwastaken I'm not a 6600 user just yet, the GPU hasn't been delivered...still on a GTX 970 for now, but in the near future I'll be back on an AMD GPU as I have for most of my life