Fama French Three Factor Model Explained Essentials of Investments Course. CFA Exam

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 4 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 12

  • @dezzy151
    @dezzy151 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Aahh, so u have recovered? Im glad to see u putting out new vids. Been praying for u❤️🙏

    • @AccountingLectures
      @AccountingLectures  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      You are most welcome. Please subscribe and share. If you want to access more resources, check my website:
      ✔farhatlectures.com/
      ✔Instagram: @farhatlectures
      ✔ Linkedin: www.linkedin.com/in/professorfarhat/
      ✔Facebook:@accountinglectures
      ✔Twitter: @farhatlectures
      🎤Email: Mansour.farhat@gmail.com

    • @AccountingLectures
      @AccountingLectures  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thank you Ashleigh. I just saw your message!

  • @ethany45
    @ethany45 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    At 8:36 you are talking that Low B/M yields higher average return than high B/M meanwhile HML is about the fact that high B/M firm outperforms low B/M firm, as you wrote yourself on point no.2. The part HML was explained in a very chaotic way.

  • @neptunefinance
    @neptunefinance ปีที่แล้ว

    *It's 6 portfolios that are constructed to build a premium time series, not 2. Great video btw !

    • @neptunefinance
      @neptunefinance ปีที่แล้ว

      i thought i would find more about cross-section regressions and more technical stuff, but i guess its not what interest financial analysts.

  • @gauravranjan5747
    @gauravranjan5747 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Too good......🤟

  • @jaysonb3103
    @jaysonb3103 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Are the beta's for market risk prem, SMB and HML mostly positive ?

  • @Usman-ml4ig
    @Usman-ml4ig 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    You uttered nonsense. Apple being followed more by analysts does not mean it will have lower systematic risk!!

    • @AccountingLectures
      @AccountingLectures  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      How do you know that Apple have a higher systemic risk??

    • @ArifKhan-ig7du
      @ArifKhan-ig7du ปีที่แล้ว

      There can be better explanations like economies of scale for larger firms and better shock absorptions, lesser cost of distress, Please correct me wherever possible. Its a great video by the way and was very helpful
      @@AccountingLectures