Thank you for taking the time to say so! It means a lot to us to hear positive feedback, and also helps with the TH-cam algorithm. Any shares, watches, subscriptions, likes and comments make a massive difference.
Yes, you're absolutely correct, and it's a very important point! We were trying to provide a simplified example of the basic synthesis concept, and thought it would be funny to produce an example that is completely flawed. But we can see how failing to allow the governess to highlight this could be misleading people to oversimplify. We'll introduce "fallacy" in a future video.
Amazing stuff! Love to see it.
Thank you for taking the time to say so! It means a lot to us to hear positive feedback, and also helps with the TH-cam algorithm. Any shares, watches, subscriptions, likes and comments make a massive difference.
question, isn't this a straight up fallacy?
that is not unheard of in rhetorical devices. nor is arguing a position one knows to be false unheard of
Thank you for your comment! Do you refer to the speaker's conclusion that kiwis should be placed third?
@@aristorators Yes, specifically whether it is an instance of the middle ground fallacy
Yes, you're absolutely correct, and it's a very important point!
We were trying to provide a simplified example of the basic synthesis concept, and thought it would be funny to produce an example that is completely flawed. But we can see how failing to allow the governess to highlight this could be misleading people to oversimplify. We'll introduce "fallacy" in a future video.
So we think the example IS an example of synthesis, but it is definitely flawed synthesis of a middle ground fallacy.