What lens is BEST for Nature Photography? | Sony 28-70mm f/3.5-5.6 VS. Sony 70-200mm f/2.8

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 9 ก.พ. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 11

  • @DaleHughesPhotography
    @DaleHughesPhotography 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Awesome video again dude.

  • @bondgabebond4907
    @bondgabebond4907 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is what photography is all about. Love those berry photos. Amazing what you can find in a forest when you are looking, not passing through. Thanks for sharing your venture in the forest. BTW, where are you when taking these photos?

    • @Atlas.Visuals
      @Atlas.Visuals  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Absolutely, there's so much to see when we stop and pay attention to it all. This is on a trail a bit outside of the Seattle area in Washington State!

  • @ComradeRussia777
    @ComradeRussia777 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great video man, really like it! I'm a photographer myself and it was very relaxing and interesting to watch it. Keep up the great 📸 work! Where do you edit your phots if i may ask?

    • @Atlas.Visuals
      @Atlas.Visuals  4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Appreciate it! I edit all my photos on Lightroom, usually just on the desktop version but sometimes on my phone or an ipad in the mobile app.

  • @kingghidorah8106
    @kingghidorah8106 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Of course the eye lens is the best one for nature photography. It is free and you come with two of them! Coupled no less to the best autofocus system in the entire animal planet.
    Jokes aside, I love nature photography, but I find myself completely helpless composing shots below 80mm of focal length.

    • @Atlas.Visuals
      @Atlas.Visuals  4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      lol very true, can't beat the 👀. Everything with photography is just practice. I'd also recommend looking at some examples of other photographers using some wider focal lengths. Specifically paying attention to how their photo is framed, and what you like/dislike about their composition. That should help you get a good idea of how to improve. Keep shooting you'll get better over time!📸

    • @kingghidorah8106
      @kingghidorah8106 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Atlas.Visuals thank you! I am practicing with a Sony DT 16-50 F2.8 SSM, I think it's great for close ups of pets and landscapes, since it's an APS-C lens it is going to need less stops of diaphram narrowing to remove any out of focus blur, but I really needa save. My future plans is keeping the prime lenses (Minolta, hella lotta 3d pop at f5.0 and dreamy colors) and get rid of all my many zooms in exchange for a 24-70 f2.8, a 70-200 f2.8 and a 200-600/150-500.
      I thought I would have a blast with a 300mm f2.8 but it came defective from ebay, then my a77ii started to die and had to get the a7iv in a huge discount.
      I will mostly keep sticking to anything beyond 80mm of length for most stuff, but may use the wide angles for some creative plans i have in the future.
      LA-EA5 is garbage. If it wasn't, I wouldn't need to change optics at all. I am severely deceived. There is the Monster La-EA4R but getting it costs €550 and saying goodbye to warranty.

  • @kyosho3079
    @kyosho3079 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    🎉