Is This Why X-Men 97 Creator Was Fired?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 13 มี.ค. 2024
  • The TJCS crew discuss the mysterious situation regarding the firing of X-Men ’97 creator Beau DeMayo and whether the firing was related to having an account on a popular website.
    Subscribe to The John Campea Show Podcast:
    Spotify
    open.spotify.com/show/4tNxvKx...
    Apple podcasts
    podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast...
    Please support the sponsor of this TJCS segment by using the link below and/or using our promo code for a special bonus deal!
    Harry’s | Quality Men’s Shaving Products. Fair Prices. Simple.
    Go to www.harrys.com/CAMPEA to blaze your own trail with Harry's and get started with a $13 trial set for just $3.
    Watch John's new documentary, "Movie Trailers: A Love Story" available now worldwide at www.vimeo.com/ondemand/movietr... and also available in the US and UK on Amazon Video.
    Support the channel or submit a question for Open Mic using the following tip link:
    streamelements.com/johncampea...
    Become a John Campea Channel Member here:
    / @johncampea
    JOHN’S GEAR LINKS
    Main Cameras
    Sony A6400 - amzn.to/2VsMMyx
    Sony A6600 - amzn.to/3bbfivl
    Canon XC15 - amzn.to/3abgZY8
    Mic pre-amps
    Cloudlifter - amzn.to/3ckgvRa
    Good Cheaper Cameras John Uses
    Canon Vixia R800 - amzn.to/2yfa8zI
    Logitech c920 Webcam - amzn.to/3eiul8m
    Main Microphones
    Rode Procaster - amzn.to/3cum1AT
    Good Cheaper Mics John Uses Sometimes
    Audio-Technica ATR2100x (usb and xlr) - amzn.to/34FSIID
    Blue Yeti (usb) - amzn.to/2XyVZb8
    Lapel Mic
    FiFine (usb) - amzn.to/2VvzocW
    Shotgun Mics
    Rode VideoMic GO (small on camera mic) - amzn.to/34A3YX0
    Rode NTG2 (main Studio mic) - amzn.to/2REkH6d
    Sennheiser MKE 600 (main Studio mic) - amzn.to/3eo5boY
    Soundboard/Mixer
    RODEcaster Pro (main) (usb) - amzn.to/2RzozFC
    Behringer Xenyx 1204USB (backup board) - amzn.to/2yf8VZn
    Streaming Software
    Wirecast Pro
    Wirecast Control Surface - amzn.to/34DzjrG
    Lights
    Nanlite Lumipad 25 (main studio lights) - amzn.to/2XAeVXd
    Neewer Ring Light (secondary lights) - amzn.to/2RDRoAP
    FalconEyes F7 Pocketlite (background color lights) - amzn.to/3emBgNT
    Selfie Ring - (guest light) - amzn.to/3a6esOZ
    Show Notes Computer
    iPad Pro 2020 - amzn.to/34ALhCA
    Submit your topic or question for The John Campea Show here:
    www.thejohncampeashow.com/contact
    Follow John on Instagram:
    / johncampea
  • บันเทิง

ความคิดเห็น • 226

  • @jacquesrivette2956
    @jacquesrivette2956 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +22

    The man goes from X-man show runner to XXX-Men show runner. Disney says it’s a conflict of interest we have to let you go! 😅

  • @rossanderson5815
    @rossanderson5815 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    If it was his only fans (that was,allegedly known about for years) then you wouldn't fire him the day of the premiere.

  • @byronkennedy7203
    @byronkennedy7203 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    I'm sure Ray is asking what John would do out of curiosity 😂

  • @jorgeore86
    @jorgeore86 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +41

    He was trying to show his Weapon X program 😂

  • @Shadow-sk3yi
    @Shadow-sk3yi 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +106

    Bro got caught in 4k

    • @eldeadkilljohnkennedy3946
      @eldeadkilljohnkennedy3946 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      Marvel studios and Disney saw his Huge Vibranium 13 inches pause😳💀

    • @davidjames579
      @davidjames579 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Wolverine's claws weren't the only thing extending.

    • @mr.joshua6818
      @mr.joshua6818 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What did he do? STILL nothing in the news.

  • @phoenixkingtheo
    @phoenixkingtheo 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

    I really don't think this is why he was fired, like how many actresses/actors have Disney employed who have done nude scenes?

  • @dinmavric5504
    @dinmavric5504 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    they'll come begging him to comeback, dont worry

  • @c17sam90
    @c17sam90 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

    If he just got fired for having explicit images on OnlyFans doesn’t that also mean anyone who has directed, written or performed explicit scenes should also lose their jobs?

    • @lordrayden3045
      @lordrayden3045 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      If their employer feels,like it

    • @c17sam90
      @c17sam90 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@lordrayden3045 which is kinda a bit weird similar to to James Gunn situation Gunn being a shock jock on Twitter is bad but the Lorenzo doing all the music for Book of Mormon and Avenue q all of which have the same comedic targets in as Gunn made jokes about is ok

  • @thescribe3184
    @thescribe3184 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    Considering what they pay writers, can you blame him for having an Onlyfans account?

  • @the_mang0slice
    @the_mang0slice 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    If his Only Fans audience gives him a better audience score than Madame Webb then Sony should hire him 😎👍

  • @Banner-18
    @Banner-18 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Rumours are saying that the show is actually good. So Disney had no choice but to fire him.

  • @matienazemy1382
    @matienazemy1382 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    5:04 Ray’s impression of the Trade Federation always cranks me up 😂

  • @JessieBanana
    @JessieBanana 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

    Firing someone for legal employment is so stupid to me. Man or woman, having an OF account as adult is not a big deal.

    • @slimjimnyc270
      @slimjimnyc270 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @JessieBanana. IIRC, Teachers have been fired for having Only Fans accounts. I remembered reading in the news that some of the students were circulating the pictures of their teacher around and the parents found out... or something to that affect.

    • @slimjimnyc270
      @slimjimnyc270 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @JessieBanana. Forgot to mention this had happen more than once in the news. A UK teacher was given a choice between keeping her teaching job or Only Fans. She kept Only Fans because she made more money than as a full-time teacher. Kind of sad that teachers are so underpaid in general.

    • @munkqiking7207
      @munkqiking7207 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@slimjimnyc270 I think in that case its a bit different. In other industries barring perhaps the most professional (Like business or justice) I think people are actually not that judgemental at all. Its really only in cases like the school students circulating it where it displays an ethical issue and people take issue with it. In other settings I think it wouldnt be much more than a silly subject of discussion or a little office drama. Whether people judge and talk behind their backs or avoid people like that is up to them.

    • @Alex_Logan22
      @Alex_Logan22 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@munkqiking7207
      He had the account when he did MoonKnight, it’s only now an issue cause of the cartoon nature. Though 97 isn’t really made for kids, by being authentic to the original it can easily be misconstrued as being for kids and thus a scenario of kids finding out (kids have smartphones these days) and circulating it can still happen, theoretically. I think it’s just another James Gunn scenario Kevin Feige will inevitably fix, can’t imagine his OF account is more important to him than this show and I can’t see Feige letting someone else write season 3 after the success.

    • @JakeRider-wc6ke
      @JakeRider-wc6ke หลายเดือนก่อน

      It is a big deal and only fans is pretty much legal prostituteion. Remember people just because something is legal doesn't means it's good or right and just because something seems good doesn't always mean it is.

  • @Alex_Logan22
    @Alex_Logan22 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    From what I heard, he only showed off his upper body, nothing explicit.

  • @grantlauzon5237
    @grantlauzon5237 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    If I was Disney I'd ask him what he earned on his only fans, then pay him that much moving forward to take it down.

    • @mslcarmon
      @mslcarmon 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Exactly! Isn’t this why the WGA went on strike? If they didn’t pay him enough to pay his bills, then Only Fans was his way of making additional money to live. We assume Disney would pay well, but we don’t know.

    • @Cash42
      @Cash42 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      That’s how you do it lol people that have been fired for having an onlyfans is such a stupid reason when most of them do it because they aren’t earning enough money with their current employment. Sure, it’s not Disney’s fault that they should pay more just because, but it’s in their best interest to do so because what’s going to happen now is all the media coverage this is getting will boost his onlyfans, he’ll make more money off that & Disney just looks bad for doing this, so if they eventually want to fix this by hiring him back, he’s got leverage to ask for better pay either way lol

    • @Alex_Logan22
      @Alex_Logan22 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Cash42
      Yea and the show’s too good for him to be replaced.

  • @thehacker4012
    @thehacker4012 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    According to some reports it wasn't just one thing that got Beau DeMayo fired but a mix of several things, which could include the Onlyfans issue.

    • @harrisd1983
      @harrisd1983 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      My guess would be there is a HR situation or he was doing something illegal.

    • @thehacker4012
      @thehacker4012 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@harrisd1983 If he was doing something illegal they probably would have distance themselves from the entire show.
      For what I heard it had to do with some behind the scenes issues with X-men and that didn't like his take on Blade. From what I heard this is NOT the reason he was fired just part of many reasons they ended up firing him.

  • @OoLOSTWORLDoO
    @OoLOSTWORLDoO 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    If true, Disney are nervous about bad press after the Jonathan Majors fiasco.

  • @Surgicaldamage
    @Surgicaldamage 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    I would imagine that it would be in his original contract. No involvement in adult orientated material of the kind while contracted for Disney. 🤷🏿‍♂️ Just guessing.

  • @DreamKrazy2028
    @DreamKrazy2028 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Imagine in that universe there’s a OF but instead it’s called OM: Only Mutants. That’d be ironically hilarious!!!

  • @bryantsfx10
    @bryantsfx10 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Most employers have a morals clause he may have violated dude has to be smarter it's Disney. Teachers are being fired for having OFs

  • @glotero
    @glotero 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    I think that having explicit pics for onlyfans may Indeed damage the brand. I mean, sure some people use OF to show off high modeling pictures without nudity...but most of the time OF is used to gain money out of very explicit nudity and suddenly Disney to be associated to that in one way or another does not look good...and I am guessing that at the time of signing a contract, stuff like that could have been layed out, so him doing it may have broken the relationship....

  • @MiniTrashCreations
    @MiniTrashCreations 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    This may be bad press for Disney, but it’s great promo for his OF!

  • @MyWorldYourView
    @MyWorldYourView 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    For all you know. Everything happened as you said you’d have handled the situation. It was all privately handled, but end result public (he’s not with Disney anymore). I can talk at length about adult-morality-mainstream Hollywood situations

  • @hardcoreep
    @hardcoreep 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    I'm sure he has a clause in his contract about external conduct that might demean the Disney brand.

    • @DamonBrazzellUkesploitation
      @DamonBrazzellUkesploitation 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I've heard that Disney does have "morals clauses" in their contracts.

    • @hardcoreep
      @hardcoreep 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@DamonBrazzellUkesploitation I work for a small media house, and even we have a social media behavior clause, so I can't imagine the legal-ese that Disney must have.

  • @williambrackin
    @williambrackin 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    If he’s going dark on the internet, I think it would have to be something so nefarious, especially with the premiere right around the corner. I don’t want to speculate but I don’t think it would be OnlyFans, but something more serious, such as an incident in the workplace.

  • @matthewlee4697
    @matthewlee4697 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    Sooooo he gets fired for having an onlyfans account but disney has no moral problem with ESPN magazine having body editions which features nude athletes ( granted genitals are not shown) but they are still naked so I don't understand the problem.

  • @MechaGoji-jf4db
    @MechaGoji-jf4db 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

    X-Men 69

    • @robertrogers074
      @robertrogers074 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      😂

    • @nxblnxbl
      @nxblnxbl 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      (SE)X-MEN THE GAY CLASS

  • @Thedrewshow559
    @Thedrewshow559 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Someone did a good job with Disney’s IP so they had to fire him because that’s not how they roll….

  • @Nam34303
    @Nam34303 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The writing on Xmen 97 is great, hope he comes back

  • @grantlauzon5237
    @grantlauzon5237 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    He'll come back to direct season 3 after moving and starting a new era for DC animated content.

    • @Alex_Logan22
      @Alex_Logan22 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      DC animation has never struggled though lol.

  • @wraithkelso
    @wraithkelso 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    ok, for one, correct, there are plenty of influencers that use onlyfans for things other than adult content, but the adult content is the thing the platform is most known for. But I would also wonder when he perhaps created the onlyfans account, was it during the WGA strike for supplemental income? If so did he continue to use it when the strike ended? Because if it was a way to get income during the strike and ended with the strike, I personally wouldn't have parted ways. I mean shoot, plenty of nurses and firefighters used that platform during the pandemic for supplemental income.

  • @kenbozu1
    @kenbozu1 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    He prob set up that account during the writers/actors strike since they had no income coming in.

    • @RustyBotStudios
      @RustyBotStudios 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Those people chose to go on strike. He shouldn’t have been trying to make money on the side.

    • @darryljack6612
      @darryljack6612 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      So... Because he wasnt making money. he shouldn't have tried to make any money?

  • @Cash42
    @Cash42 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I understand when this sort of thing happens with some professions like teachers, but even so, it’s really nobody’s business & this is really stupid.

  • @calibratedtub4810
    @calibratedtub4810 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    So Valkyrie asking if kid marvel was married to a grown ass brie Larson was not x-rated?????

  • @pauldareason
    @pauldareason 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    the only time a company distance themselves like this is when the person has broken the type of laws that involve predators. Even when Johnathan majors was suspected he wasn't cut off immediately, but say Kevin spacey type crime get you cut off right then . So they hope to keep it quiet until the show drops at least .

  • @TheSpartanfan84
    @TheSpartanfan84 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    Someone snitched on him I bet

    • @miguelvargas5202
      @miguelvargas5202 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I wouldn’t be surprised if someone did and this is where we’re at now. Jealousy in the industry you could say

  • @Klepcx
    @Klepcx 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    I honestly don't believe it was just the only fans alone. I have been following Beau since Marvel started presenting XMEN 97 at Comic Con a few years back and even then I remember showing colleagues of mine his instagram page in shock because of his personal content. No shade, but even I asked these very same questions about how is Disney openly affiliated with this guy and his semi-sexual content? Im even more shocked that its finally news now lol

    • @Firehazard159
      @Firehazard159 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Wtf does his personal life have to do with his work? Unless he was posting naked X-Men or mixing business with personal socials, it's a non-issue.

    • @Klepcx
      @Klepcx หลายเดือนก่อน

      Because unfortunately that hows the industry plays. Especially Disney.@@Firehazard159

  • @dontapinkney3994
    @dontapinkney3994 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    Welp, James Gunn was fired and brought back! So… we’ll see how this plays out??

    • @jme6036
      @jme6036 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      This guy’s replaceable. James Gunn wasn’t

    • @Luke-qo3xr
      @Luke-qo3xr 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      ​@@jme6036 James Gunn is definitely replaceable

    • @cesaracosta5483
      @cesaracosta5483 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      @@Luke-qo3xrIf he’s replaceable then Why was he brought back and allowed to complete the GOTG trilogy? Why is he currently running DC?

    • @cesaracosta5483
      @cesaracosta5483 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      He was fired over inappropriate tweets he made 15 years ago. What this guy did may have been worse.

    • @Luke-qo3xr
      @Luke-qo3xr 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @cesaracosta5483 Idk. Why Is he? Hundreds of other directors could do what he does. James Gunn is nothing special.

  • @thedirtytowel3155
    @thedirtytowel3155 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    why is that the reason he got fired?? sure having an onlyfans is kind of cringe, but its not like its a crime, or even immoral.

  • @jackdexter9439
    @jackdexter9439 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Totally agree with your points, John and Ray. I guess it's also a matter of degree - showing naked pics is one thing, being shafted on video ... totally different degree.

  • @fearandsmoking
    @fearandsmoking 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    This guy's has probably made an insane amount of money on his onlyfans with all this publicity he's getting

    • @Alex_Logan22
      @Alex_Logan22 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Yea but X-Men clearly means a lot to him, he’ll inevitably drop OF to come back.

  • @byronkennedy7203
    @byronkennedy7203 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Wouldn't be the first time someone was fired for having an onlyfans

  • @Mr49r1681
    @Mr49r1681 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    So Disney’s only showing 1 season of X-Men ‘97 while Beau’s nude modeling his X-factor around?

  • @kaaredyrness2120
    @kaaredyrness2120 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    I don't buy for 1 minute but this has anything to do with the only fans account. Disney already learned through James Gunn that knee jerk firing someone over something they put online like this doesn't work out well.

  • @jaredmccray2106
    @jaredmccray2106 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Bro said better culturally well rounded 😂😂 to watch only fans

  • @OhGeeGanksta
    @OhGeeGanksta 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Come on John, you know perception is everything for Disney.

  • @drewdaman80
    @drewdaman80 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Was it his only income source during the writer’s strike? If it’s due to explicit photos, then shouldn’t this standard be held to the actors and actresses who have had nude and simulated scenes in other films?

    • @Herkules16
      @Herkules16 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      There's a big difference between getting nude for pornographic reasons and doing it for film which is a form of art

    • @drewdaman80
      @drewdaman80 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      True…but then that opens a big can of worms with the subjective nature of art…is “Birdpocalypse” art? Are the works of sensationalist artists that use feces art? Definitely both an affirmative and negative argument in that debate.

    • @Herkules16
      @Herkules16 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@drewdaman80 all film and television, for better or worse, is a form of self expression and storytelling, just like all art and actors are artists that help tell the story and sometimes that involves nudity. Disney themselves have films and television with nudity, they even have a show airing right now, Shogun, which has nudity and they own many movies that while they didn't make, are accessible on Disney+.

  • @simongrenshaw22
    @simongrenshaw22 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Dunno why people care if it was the reason. OF is for those who go looking and pay for it.

  • @z5m2
    @z5m2 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Not illegal, but may violate internal job policies that result in termination with cause. A media company like Disney would have brand reputation considerations and rules around side businesses involving people getting nekked. And it's 100% justified given it's public facing businesses.

    • @blake8357
      @blake8357 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      not only that but i guarantee theres verbatim in contract that has this policy in it

  • @Banfrid
    @Banfrid 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Why private, completely not connected to work, life activities should be linked to your work? More people are finding out about this OF now than if they just kept it quite

    • @joseabreu-nn5cu
      @joseabreu-nn5cu 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      DeMayo should’ve never done this. If he needed more money he should’ve take another route. Women or man idc if u want to sell ur body then y do u need another job??

  • @rafaelploumis8682
    @rafaelploumis8682 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    "Noone would work for them". Noone does. Disney has a serious problem with finding talent for years now. Hence the tremendous drop in quality.

    • @soulofanerd9364
      @soulofanerd9364 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      He said no one would work "with him" I believe

  • @grandpallama
    @grandpallama 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    It's probably not the OF page.
    1. Sources report Disney was aware of the page from the outset, and even that he talked about X-Men '97 on it.
    2. His OF page doesn't (per that same reporting) have anything explicit on it.
    3. If they HAD fired him over this, why would they wait until days before the release?
    4. If they HAD fired him over this, why would there not be a statement on their part? They put one out about Gunn's firing.
    5. The degree to which he's been cut off, and the deafening silence about why, STRONGLY suggests an HR issue in-house.
    6. DeMayo deleted all his OWN social media, a pre-emptive PR shield move that doesn't make sense if Disney fired him over his OF.

    • @NemesisSP
      @NemesisSP 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Well, I hate to point out that this all is untrue but we do have the Hollywood Reporter not only stating very clearly he was fired but also that there was a ME video about it that shows (censored) pics that show that his OF was in fact quite explicit.
      I'm not saying the OF was the thing that got him fired, but it is untrue to say he wasn't fired nor that it was explicit. The Hollywood Reporter would not be specifically stating he was fired if he hadn't been.

  • @Silas_Kow
    @Silas_Kow 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    The guy excluded his accounts and professional email, did Disney put a bounty on his head, or what?

  • @notanactualuser
    @notanactualuser 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Honestly, the OF stuff wouldn't be a deal breaker or if it was, it would be discussed more. The fact nothing is being said AND the show is about to come out, I think it's fairly safe to say that gross sexual misconduct occurred, potentially with someone underage.
    Disney want to hope that the show won't be tarnished because they've already had so many issues with people worried that Disney is pushing inappropriate creators etc. this could really damage Disney Plus because it's both legacy content and it's marvel related content at a a time when the MCU is not so hot. Add on top X-Men 97 is a more kid-friendly show.
    If the news of the writer breaks first, it will be all that's talked about in relation to the show and people won't want to support it.

  • @gilt8121
    @gilt8121 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Contracts people ...... Seriously. Let's just say moral clause is probably in Disney contracts. And thank God you are not even trying to portray a coherent thought on this.

  • @rpvisual6192
    @rpvisual6192 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Times are tough, zero reason to slut shame a creative 🚫🚫🚫

  • @omaralgarin6493
    @omaralgarin6493 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Only fans is only for 18+ I don’t see the issue if this is the case

    • @BlueSparkzVideos
      @BlueSparkzVideos 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      It's not just about legality. Companies are also concerned about their image. A company could fire you over your free speech...especially if you live in an at-will state.

    • @The92Ghost
      @The92Ghost 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@BlueSparkzVideos and that is where companies get wrong. You can't force your image on someone. Everyone are free to be who they want to be and X-Men '97 covers that well.

  • @infernostorm2615
    @infernostorm2615 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    This is the Streisand effect coming into action if true.

  • @WilliamJames48
    @WilliamJames48 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    They're concerned that continuing to employ him might hurt viewership. Disney is concerned about viewership...

  • @flaminggmonkeyss
    @flaminggmonkeyss 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    ya it'd be pretty lame for them to fire him for that, I hope its something else.
    otherwise they would have to fire a lot of people

  • @MIZZ.BLKNRD
    @MIZZ.BLKNRD 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I’m sure he got a ton more OnlyFans subscribers after this rumor went public. 😂

  • @kevhayden6506
    @kevhayden6506 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    its pretty simple. he posted a ****pic and thats against disneys code of conduct. cut and dry (and the pic is now floating on twitter).

    • @t7khxleviathan22
      @t7khxleviathan22 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      yeah, but photos of "leaked nudes" of other celebs get out and they don't get fired so it's kind of like whatever. But I agree with what you're saying I'm just saying who gives a fuck man it's just a human body no kid is gonna go on only fans and find that guy's nudes.

    • @davidjames579
      @davidjames579 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      The only people who care are idiotic parents who think adults working on children's programs should have the social lives of children.

  • @IamLegendaryguy1998
    @IamLegendaryguy1998 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    X men 97 greatness

  • @flyconcepts
    @flyconcepts 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Goofy got fired on his day off 😂

    • @jsinkillings2969
      @jsinkillings2969 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      They said they caught him stealing boxes

  • @dca2c
    @dca2c 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I’m kinda surprised Disney even cares…

    • @wlsntech
      @wlsntech 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Family Friendly Corporations always care

  • @Supherodude
    @Supherodude 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    How did Disney find out about his OnlyFans?

    • @MisterJIFF
      @MisterJIFF 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Some old dude on the board felt funny seeing his funny and wanted him ...fired

    • @JakeRider-wc6ke
      @JakeRider-wc6ke หลายเดือนก่อน

      Oh they will found out

    • @MisterJIFF
      @MisterJIFF หลายเดือนก่อน

      It is not a secret account

    • @Enigmaticbeacon
      @Enigmaticbeacon หลายเดือนก่อน

      Apparently his onlyfans wasn't even inappropriate lol

  • @lordofthebricks1
    @lordofthebricks1 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    So why to hire him at the first place if they knew that he has account?? Isn't that hypocrisy?

    • @seanleon2766
      @seanleon2766 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Who said they knew about his account before hiring him?

    • @lordofthebricks1
      @lordofthebricks1 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      @@seanleon2766 Companies like Disney know more about actors and directors than themselves before hiring them

    • @Yic17Gaming
      @Yic17Gaming 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@lordofthebricks1 He's worked for them for years. He could have started a OF account recently?

    • @seanleon2766
      @seanleon2766 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@lordofthebricks1 It's funny how they didn't know about Gunn's old controversial tweet a while back before hiring him.

    • @seanleon2766
      @seanleon2766 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@lordofthebricks1 Tweets that led to his firing, but you say they always know all about the person they hire.

  • @JakeRider-wc6ke
    @JakeRider-wc6ke หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Just because something is legal doesn't means it's right

  • @taihirglover8469
    @taihirglover8469 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Employers frown upon people doing any time of sexual content outside of work cuz there an employee and they represent the company that's why a lot of 🌽 stars aren't able to get a regular 9 to 5 if they had a long career in the game.

    • @t7khxleviathan22
      @t7khxleviathan22 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      quite true, but also why do people give a fuck as consumers I mean.

    • @davidjames579
      @davidjames579 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You only represent the company on company time. If they're not paying you they can't tell you what to do during that time.

    • @taihirglover8469
      @taihirglover8469 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@davidjames579 Yes but your an employee for as long as u work there and if you do something that is immoral then you will be fired. That's like a person deleting people outside of company time should they still be able to work their job?

    • @davidjames579
      @davidjames579 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@taihirglover8469 only during the hours you've paid. Deleting, what do you mean?

  • @josephwoods5925
    @josephwoods5925 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Maybe there was something bigger that happened and we've just no heard about it, yet. After all, the OnlyFans thing is just speculation.

  • @Obez45
    @Obez45 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    11:45 Side hustle?

  • @robertrogers074
    @robertrogers074 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I like that John ask is having a onlyfans account legal 😂.

    • @tmovies92
      @tmovies92 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      If it was illegal, Bella Thorne would've been in Jail by now lol

  • @dokbrian
    @dokbrian 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    that face though. ill subscribe to his only fans

  • @HevICue
    @HevICue 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    They have to be on him about that because yes he is doing a cartoon. People forget about the X-Men Gold comics debacle where an artist used to put subliminal things in the comic background and had to let them go.

  • @colmcoakley3916
    @colmcoakley3916 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    What is so controversial about having an only fans account? Is the gentleman in question posting inappropriate images / text comments? I'm nearly 40 and still pine for Windows XP.

    • @nervenllarena4948
      @nervenllarena4948 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      if you dont know what an onlyfans is good for you LOL

    • @RevengeOfThaNerd
      @RevengeOfThaNerd 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@nervenllarena4948the innocent lol. I'm 39 my guy must live a very protected life.

  • @kingthanos3741
    @kingthanos3741 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Bro poor things is on Disney + now!! Sooooo .......😂

    • @evieblue959
      @evieblue959 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      No no but that’s expensive! porn which makes it culture

  • @darkpassenger83
    @darkpassenger83 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Why didnt you just look up to see if he has an OF account? Seems fairly easy… lol

  • @phillyvoodoo
    @phillyvoodoo 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Someone else here said it already but dont large companies like Disney do extensive background checks before hiring anyone in the controlling positions???

    • @Yic17Gaming
      @Yic17Gaming 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      He's worked for them for years. He could have started a OF account recently.

  • @theblite32
    @theblite32 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    He had to have an OF to see John Cena's OF. 😂

  • @ralamothe318
    @ralamothe318 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    It wasn't that he ONLY had a OnlyFans account - but he also had, shall we say risqué content on it as well. Not a good look if you're working for a "family-friendly" entertainment company.

    • @davidjames579
      @davidjames579 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Actors make films for Disney and adult themed films for other studios. Different films for different audiences. Most people understand that or don't care.

    • @jameslaroccoii7975
      @jameslaroccoii7975 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      All I’m
      Saying is “pegging” is referenced in the Deadpool trailer is ok though.

  • @jameslaroccoii7975
    @jameslaroccoii7975 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I guess my question is, was a conversation was had first? I would then dispute Disneys “values” especially concerning Deadpool 3 coming up.
    I love Deadpool and am excited for it. However, I have to call into question their “values” when the trailer brought up pegging.
    So my question is what is the difference between that and “if” he had an onlyfans? I get the feeling there is more to it.

    • @grantlauzon5237
      @grantlauzon5237 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Ryan Reynolds would make so much money on only fans.

    • @Alex_Logan22
      @Alex_Logan22 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Deadpool is both R rated and viewed for adults, Disney has done adult content before. X-Men 97 while not explicitly for kids, is authentic to a kid’s show and thus can be construed as one, plus it’s rated PG.

  • @r.j.sullivan2104
    @r.j.sullivan2104 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Rude tweets are also legal.

    • @Dru2037
      @Dru2037 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Did you watch the video?

    • @r.j.sullivan2104
      @r.j.sullivan2104 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Dru2037 Disney has already fired several people for various social media choices, so this isn’t a precedent (if true).

  • @simonakoumoufouda502
    @simonakoumoufouda502 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Guy will be own studio ✌🏾

    • @lordrayden3045
      @lordrayden3045 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Right…….
      Sure thing

  • @tmovies92
    @tmovies92 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I mean, Teachers have gotten fired for having an OF page, so this isn't surprising

    • @believeume122
      @believeume122 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      He's not a teacher.... It's apple and oranges

    • @davidaguilar4146
      @davidaguilar4146 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      He had it before he got hired Lmaoo

    • @savonlofton
      @savonlofton 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      He's not a teacher, though. This isn't a good comparison

    • @lordrayden3045
      @lordrayden3045 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@believeume122
      No it’s really not that different.
      Employers can fire people

  • @jeysmoothies
    @jeysmoothies 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    he wa snapped out of existence by Thanos lol

  • @emmagio56
    @emmagio56 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    There’s talk the reason has to do with him inserting his own agenda (gay) into the show and Disney was not happy.. whether it’s true or not we’ll know by focusing on the non binary character as he seems to be at the source of it all

  • @Jones-ke6bt
    @Jones-ke6bt 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Inb4 john campea of.

  • @HAGZ0483
    @HAGZ0483 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Guess Disney didn't knew about the OF account until a few weeks ago, they also fired Gunn for old stuff they didn't learn until years later it had happen.

    • @Dru2037
      @Dru2037 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Gunn didn't show his little gun on the Internet.

    • @MrRobertGillan
      @MrRobertGillan 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Dumb comparison.

    • @davidjames579
      @davidjames579 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@Dru2037that we know of

    • @WastedPo
      @WastedPo 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I don't think that's actually not true about Gunn. They did know about Gunn's previous lame jokes from years ago, and Gunn had even apologized about them at one point. It's just that people on the political right started to make a renewed stink about those old tweets, and then Disney took action for the sake of optics.

  • @jonnycashh3876
    @jonnycashh3876 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    They made sign the deal …than released him

  • @Lord_Clarke
    @Lord_Clarke 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Disney fired Paul Pierce from ESPN for having ladies in bikinis while he was on Instagram live on his day off so them firing for a OF is totally in line with them. Disney firing folks for morality reasons is hilarious though given how sh!tty they treat their parks employees.

  • @josermaiz
    @josermaiz 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Probably Mr sinister fired him

  • @simonakoumoufouda502
    @simonakoumoufouda502 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Disney plus xxx🤣

  • @Castrodeleonfilmclips
    @Castrodeleonfilmclips 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    He’s just a writer he never worked the 1990’s show only 2003 show

  • @Obez45
    @Obez45 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    1:54 for research purposes...

  • @The_blindpizzaguy1300
    @The_blindpizzaguy1300 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The thing about only fans is there are no rules like Ray is saying you could post pictures of fans like ceiling fans, Dyson fans, whatever fans and that can be your only fans if that’s what you wanted to do. But at the same time, people sign up to that site to view pornographic images, both of children and adults. So that’s why it doesn’t look great for Disney because by having him there it promotes that. So I can completely understand Disney’s decision if that’s what happened. He left due to the fact that he didn’t want to not view pornographic images. I think that’s a silly reason for leaving, especially if Disney has already hired you to write three seasons of the show. And you were getting paid for that.. sad I don’t know honestly I understand this needs decision, but I think the whole thing is just plain silly

    • @grandpallama
      @grandpallama 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Pornographic images of children? C'mon.

  • @SantaClausEdmonton
    @SantaClausEdmonton 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Probably fired for public opinion and get re hire later .. similar has suspension

  • @Theskatenerdchannel
    @Theskatenerdchannel 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    only fans are xrated materila and he represents disney so he cant have that attached to him

    • @The92Ghost
      @The92Ghost 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      People have right to have their personal life and their professional life should never get ahead of his personal life. Its not like kids will go seeking for his nudes if he had such and OF is paid content and it is quite expensive as well. Claiming that he represents Disney and has no personal life is just biggot.

    • @JakeRider-wc6ke
      @JakeRider-wc6ke หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​So in other words it's a excuse for sins and wrong/nasty doings

    • @masterhojo1
      @masterhojo1 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It's 2024. You have no personal life if you're in that type of industry, hell, it's hard for reg ass people to have private lives as it is​@@The92Ghost

  • @RevengeOfThaNerd
    @RevengeOfThaNerd 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    It's really none of our business lol. This is stupid.

  • @simonakoumoufouda502
    @simonakoumoufouda502 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Loyalfans 😂

  • @believeume122
    @believeume122 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    This is so dumb. They can't control him having an only fans. They should have done their home before hiring him. If this is the case I hope he sues them. And then surprise surprise it's gonna be in the headlines even more.