Albert Eisenstein 1 Corinthians 1:19-21 For it is written: "I will destroy the wisdom of the wise; the intelligence of the intelligent I will frustrate."Where is the wise person? Where is the teacher of the law? Where is the philosopher of this age? Has not God made foolish the wisdom of the world?For since in the wisdom of God the world through its wisdom did not know him (God)
The heavens don't exist, and never did. You must think the word 'heavens' means 'cosmos' or 'universe', but it actually refers to several crystalline domes that supposedly were stretched out over a flat circle Earth 'like a tent to dwell in'. They were also called 'skies', 'vaults', or 'firmaments'.
Absolutely! And every tiny creature that exists, from the smallest ant till we find that we are so small in this universe and behind the universe is God. That is how big He is
Stephen Meyer says that "The Universe had a Beginning". But, where does it say that in Genesis? And, where does God say in Genesis that there was a Big Bang?
@@vshah1010 the first chapter of genesis. light didn't even exist prior to God making the heavens and the earth. when you read earth there don't think planet earth think dirt.
Hubble was not the originator of the theory of an expanding universe and therefore a finite universe which had a beginning. The person who proposed the theory was Georges Lemaitre. This is an extract from Wikipedia: Georges Henri Joseph Édouard Lemaître, RAS Associate[1] (French: [ʒɔʁʒᵊ ləmɛ:tʁᵊ] ( listen); 17 July 1894 - 20 June 1966) was a Belgian Catholic Priest, astronomer and professor of physics at the Catholic University of Leuven.[2] He proposed on theoretical grounds that the universe is expanding, which was observationally confirmed soon afterwards by Edwin Hubble.[3][4] He was the first to derive what is now known as Hubble's law and made the first estimation of what is now called the Hubble constant, which he published in 1927, two years before Hubble's article.[5][6][7][8] Lemaître also proposed what became known as the Big Bang theory of the origin of the universe, which he called his "hypothesis of the primeval atom" or the "Cosmic Egg".[9] Lemaître believed that the Universe was created and therefore had a beginning. He worked out the mathematics that launched the hypothesis. When he met Einstein to show him the workings of the theory, Einstein declared: This is the most beautiful work I've ever seen. Hubble soon picked up the theory and proved it in fact through physical measurements of galaxies. History does not give credit to Lemaître simply because he was a Catholic priest besides being a genius and the anti-Christian atheistic scientific cabal will not accept that a Catholic priest could trump them all.
watcher of the road look Lemaitre up when you get there. He will set you straight....no cabal...no other fictions. The actual story is much more rich.AMDG
The human brain is hardwired to believe everything must have a beginning and an end the concept of the universe not having a beginning is beyond us. So we brush this under the carpet and look for an answer to the origins of the universe that sits more comfortably within our mindset. The big bang theory ticks all the boxes for astronomers it gives the universe a beginning and makes the universe conform to how we think it should be and want it to be.
What is not mentioned is that if Hubble could see the expansion by the shift of light and that light was by origin was leaving the location of sight, simply meaning, that if a person can see something leaving their line of sight then the origin must have began within the line of sight, Basically the earthly solar system must have been center origin of the expansion or else we couldn't see the shift.
@Patrick Names THINK... All things EXPAND from a point of origin. And depending on the directional dispersement, is were your line of sight will be. Some process expand in a single direction, while others in many. A bullet, compared to a firework. Therefore, if your seeing it, it's origin must have originally, been in your line of sight, allowing for a transitioning shift. There is only so much a lens can capture.
You can't accurately deal with any of this without first coming to grips with the findings of Halton Arp: redshift is intrinsic, not Doppler effect. LSS: no big bang...the implications are, of course, shattering
Einstein was just another atheist liar, living in self deception rather than facing the truth that one day he will stand before Christ and give an account for his life's deeds.
When it comes to lies, christians and muslims are masters at it. They actually LIVE the lie. Einstein was one of the finest minds the world has ever known, who contributed mountains of knowledge to the world. What have you contributed? Try contributing some evidence that your christ ever existed before using him to threaten people.
His life's deeds were nothing short of amazing I didn't know that someone that backed up everything they say with facts Are liars I respect that you believe in something Now respect mine to not believe in it We're not lairs m8
Stephen Meyers is a deceiver, using incorrect science to deceive. Doesn't the God of the Bible not like those that lie or deceive? He deliberately makes incorrect assumptions in order to distort the math. For example, in another video he calculates the "odds" of life. But he falsely assumes all events are independent in order to get a high number to get low odds.
It seems Ligonier Ministries is uncomfortable with relatively innocuous comments, since mine has gone missing. I will restate: the Hubble not only shows that the universe had a beginning, but that the beginning was billions of years ago.
How long was the unlit candle burning? This is assuming it was billions of years old, as none of what is proposed by the "billions of years" crowd was ever observed. If it wasn't observed, it can't be a "fact" that the universe is billions of years old. Also, there is always the never-ending cycle of "first cause". You could say that gravity caused the universe to exist, but then you would have to explain how gravity came to exist, and then what created that? And so on. You could argue back the point of "what created God" or "the universe is in a never-ending cycle", but that's the point, isn't it? We can't "prove" our origins, but we do have evidence to believe that this wasn't all by accident or random processes. Order is prevalent in the universe, and the order it declares demands an explanation.
Except, the heavens don't exist, and never did. The word 'heavens' does not mean 'outer space' or 'cosmos', but rater refers to several domes that were stretched out over a flat disk-shaped Earth 'like a tent to dwell in'.
@@doctorwebman shamayim ve'et ha'aretz (הַשָּׁמַיִם וְאֵת הָאָרֶץ) which is translated the "Heavens and Earth" in Genesis 1 - is a term in biblical hebrew that refers to the entire cosmos
@@s.gurdian3230 That is incorrect. What they thought the cosmos were was not the same as what we now know the cosmos to be today. They believed there were domes with lights set into them (ie. the firmament, skies, heavens, etc.), and they didn't know that galaxies exist.
@@doctorwebman your claim is incorrect. The Bible says that God hangs the earth upon nothing. Firmament (i.e. solid dome) cosmology wasn’t even a thing until the Greeks. The word “raqia” in the Bible better translates to “expanse,” not “firmament.” The firmament interpretation was merely read into the original Hebrew texts by the Greeks rather than drawn from the texts. It’s a syncretism. “Raqia” simply conveys an act of spreading out, and says nothing strictly about whether what’s being spread out is solid or gaseous. Kindly... do not spread misinformation and historical revisionism.
@@juilianbautista4067 "your claim is incorrect" No, it isn't. If you beg to differ, explain HOW my claim is incorrect. "The Bible says that God hangs the earth upon nothing." Not only does that do nothing to argue against the flat Earth model of the Bible, it is wrong. The Earth is not hanged over nothing, and is rather in orbit around a star. " Firmament (i.e. solid dome) cosmology wasn’t even a thing until the Greeks." It was a model that the ancient Jews held to. Try again. "The word “raqia” in the Bible better translates to “expanse,” not “firmament.”" An expanse was a dome covering a flat circular Earth, and the word is interchangeable with 'firmament'. "The firmament interpretation was merely read into the original Hebrew texts by the Greeks rather than drawn from the texts. It’s a syncretism. “Raqia” simply conveys an act of spreading out, and says nothing strictly about whether what’s being spread out is solid or gaseous. Kindly... do not spread misinformation and historical revisionism." I am not the one here spreading disinformation. You are, and that you think you know better how to translate an ancient text suggests you think you know better than the professionals, which indicates you have the Dunning-Kruger effect.
Don't worry about the telescopes. The expanding of the universe was mentioned in the Quran 1400 years ago when there were no telescopes or scientific advancements. (Quran chapter 51 verse 47) - Its quite obvious to the thinking minds who could have mentioned that.
Where is the firmament? The bible says there is a firmament, it says the earth is flat, it says the earth is fixed and does not move. If the universe was created by gods the god of the bible was nothing to do with it.
Albert Eisenstein
1 Corinthians 1:19-21 For it is written: "I will destroy the wisdom of the wise; the intelligence of the intelligent I will frustrate."Where is the wise person? Where is the teacher of the law? Where is the philosopher of this age? Has not God made foolish the wisdom of the world?For since in the wisdom of God the world through its wisdom did not know him (God)
Any particular time period this gonna happen ? Any mention in the Bible?
@@kushalpagolu8588 End times, I think.
wow. the heavens DECLARE the glory of God!
The heavens don't exist, and never did. You must think the word 'heavens' means 'cosmos' or 'universe', but it actually refers to several crystalline domes that supposedly were stretched out over a flat circle Earth 'like a tent to dwell in'. They were also called 'skies', 'vaults', or 'firmaments'.
Absolutely! And every tiny creature that exists, from the smallest ant till we find that we are so small in this universe and behind the universe is God. That is how big He is
How do you get from "The Universe had a beginning" to "God did it?"
Stephen Meyer says that "The Universe had a Beginning". But, where does it say that in Genesis? And, where does God say in Genesis that there was a Big Bang?
@@vshah1010 the first chapter of genesis. light didn't even exist prior to God making the heavens and the earth. when you read earth there don't think planet earth think dirt.
I cant wait to give Jesus a big hug when I meet him.😎
Jesus is not God...he was his messanger
@@sadiaasad6843 more like he IS His messenger
Really Deep
Hubble was not the originator of the theory of an expanding universe and therefore a finite universe which had a beginning. The person who proposed the theory was Georges Lemaitre. This is an extract from Wikipedia:
Georges Henri Joseph Édouard Lemaître, RAS Associate[1] (French: [ʒɔʁʒᵊ ləmɛ:tʁᵊ] ( listen); 17 July 1894 - 20 June 1966) was a Belgian Catholic Priest, astronomer and professor of physics at the Catholic University of Leuven.[2] He proposed on theoretical grounds that the universe is expanding, which was observationally confirmed soon afterwards by Edwin Hubble.[3][4] He was the first to derive what is now known as Hubble's law and made the first estimation of what is now called the Hubble constant, which he published in 1927, two years before Hubble's article.[5][6][7][8] Lemaître also proposed what became known as the Big Bang theory of the origin of the universe, which he called his "hypothesis of the primeval atom" or the "Cosmic Egg".[9]
Lemaître believed that the Universe was created and therefore had a beginning. He worked out the mathematics that launched the hypothesis. When he met Einstein to show him the workings of the theory, Einstein declared: This is the most beautiful work I've ever seen.
Hubble soon picked up the theory and proved it in fact through physical measurements of galaxies. History does not give credit to Lemaître simply because he was a Catholic priest besides being a genius and the anti-Christian atheistic scientific cabal will not accept that a Catholic priest could trump them all.
watcher of the road look Lemaitre up when you get there. He will set you straight....no cabal...no other fictions. The actual story is much more rich.AMDG
wow, I love what those astronomers can teach us about god
Wow! I love what those astronomers can teach us about God .
@@hortenciabogroff3704 😉🖒
Would anyone be able to provide a link to this full presentation please?
The human brain is hardwired to believe everything must have a beginning and an end the concept of the universe not having a beginning is beyond us. So we brush this under the carpet and look for an answer to the origins of the universe that sits more comfortably within our mindset. The big bang theory ticks all the boxes for astronomers it gives the universe a beginning and makes the universe conform to how we think it should be and want it to be.
is it expanding and moving towards decay at the same time ?
Yes, is expanding wich is one of the reasons because of the decay
@@EasternOrthodoxChristian but doesn't decay mean moving towards destruction or breakdown.. ?
What is not mentioned is that if Hubble could see the expansion by the shift of light and that light was by origin was leaving the location of sight,
simply meaning, that if a person can see something leaving their line of sight then the origin must have began within the line of sight,
Basically the earthly solar system must have been center origin of the expansion or else we couldn't see the shift.
@Patrick Names THINK...
All things EXPAND from a point of origin. And depending on the directional dispersement, is were your line of sight will be. Some process expand in a single direction, while others in many. A bullet, compared to a firework. Therefore, if your seeing it, it's origin must have originally, been in your line of sight, allowing for a transitioning shift. There is only so much a lens can capture.
Wow
You can't accurately deal with any of this without first coming to grips with the findings of Halton Arp: redshift is intrinsic, not Doppler effect. LSS: no big bang...the implications are, of course, shattering
Sounds like a theory not facts
This guy preaches the Bible. He won't support any theory that refutes what the Bible says. He is a deceiver.
❤
Why can’t we teleport yet?
Take a look at the human body..Theres a creator who created the human body..Its really obvious..
@Patrick Names I had the ultimate supernatural experience when I was a child..Spirits are real..evolution is a lie...
@Patrick Names You should give your life to Jesus.
@Patrick Names your going to burn in hell..
@Patrick Names you need to go 2 church find Jesus...
@Patrick Names hell is very real you dont want 2 go there lets pray together.
Einstein was just another atheist liar, living in self deception rather than facing the truth that one day he will stand before Christ and give an account for his life's deeds.
When it comes to lies, christians and muslims are masters at it. They actually LIVE the lie.
Einstein was one of the finest minds the world has ever known, who contributed mountains of knowledge to the world. What have you contributed?
Try contributing some evidence that your christ ever existed before using him to threaten people.
Many atheists historians accept Jesus existed, did you know?
Michael Dodds DAT TRUE
His life's deeds were nothing short of amazing
I didn't know that someone that backed up everything they say with facts
Are liars
I respect that you believe in something
Now respect mine to not believe in it
We're not lairs m8
Stephen Meyers is a deceiver, using incorrect science to deceive. Doesn't the God of the Bible not like those that lie or deceive?
He deliberately makes incorrect assumptions in order to distort the math. For example, in another video he calculates the "odds" of life. But he falsely assumes all events are independent in order to get a high number to get low odds.
It seems Ligonier Ministries is uncomfortable with relatively innocuous comments, since mine has gone missing. I will restate: the Hubble not only shows that the universe had a beginning, but that the beginning was billions of years ago.
How long was the unlit candle burning? This is assuming it was billions of years old, as none of what is proposed by the "billions of years" crowd was ever observed. If it wasn't observed, it can't be a "fact" that the universe is billions of years old.
Also, there is always the never-ending cycle of "first cause". You could say that gravity caused the universe to exist, but then you would have to explain how gravity came to exist, and then what created that? And so on.
You could argue back the point of "what created God" or "the universe is in a never-ending cycle", but that's the point, isn't it? We can't "prove" our origins, but we do have evidence to believe that this wasn't all by accident or random processes. Order is prevalent in the universe, and the order it declares demands an explanation.
Calm your tits 😂😂
In the beginning god created the heavens and the earth. Y'all are sleep
Except, the heavens don't exist, and never did. The word 'heavens' does not mean 'outer space' or 'cosmos', but rater refers to several domes that were stretched out over a flat disk-shaped Earth 'like a tent to dwell in'.
@@doctorwebman shamayim ve'et ha'aretz (הַשָּׁמַיִם וְאֵת הָאָרֶץ) which is translated the "Heavens and Earth" in Genesis 1 - is a term in biblical hebrew that refers to the entire cosmos
@@s.gurdian3230 That is incorrect. What they thought the cosmos were was not the same as what we now know the cosmos to be today. They believed there were domes with lights set into them (ie. the firmament, skies, heavens, etc.), and they didn't know that galaxies exist.
@@doctorwebman your claim is incorrect. The Bible says that God hangs the earth upon nothing. Firmament (i.e. solid dome) cosmology wasn’t even a thing until the Greeks. The word “raqia” in the Bible better translates to “expanse,” not “firmament.” The firmament interpretation was merely read into the original Hebrew texts by the Greeks rather than drawn from the texts. It’s a syncretism. “Raqia” simply conveys an act of spreading out, and says nothing strictly about whether what’s being spread out is solid or gaseous. Kindly... do not spread misinformation and historical revisionism.
@@juilianbautista4067 "your claim is incorrect"
No, it isn't. If you beg to differ, explain HOW my claim is incorrect.
"The Bible says that God hangs the earth upon nothing."
Not only does that do nothing to argue against the flat Earth model of the Bible, it is wrong. The Earth is not hanged over nothing, and is rather in orbit around a star.
" Firmament (i.e. solid dome) cosmology wasn’t even a thing until the Greeks."
It was a model that the ancient Jews held to. Try again.
"The word “raqia” in the Bible better translates to “expanse,” not “firmament.”"
An expanse was a dome covering a flat circular Earth, and the word is interchangeable with 'firmament'.
"The firmament interpretation was merely read into the original Hebrew texts by the Greeks rather than drawn from the texts. It’s a syncretism. “Raqia” simply conveys an act of spreading out, and says nothing strictly about whether what’s being spread out is solid or gaseous. Kindly... do not spread misinformation and historical revisionism."
I am not the one here spreading disinformation. You are, and that you think you know better how to translate an ancient text suggests you think you know better than the professionals, which indicates you have the Dunning-Kruger effect.
Google Halton Arp
Even you had a beginning. Maybe a accident but your here now.lol
Large domed telescopes? What a poser! Even conflating Hubble the man with the telescope named after him. Smh.
Don't worry about the telescopes. The expanding of the universe was mentioned in the Quran 1400 years ago when there were no telescopes or scientific advancements. (Quran chapter 51 verse 47) - Its quite obvious to the thinking minds who could have mentioned that.
@@mzkhan93 but the next verse mentions the earth is flat, so….
@@ScienceFan1859 no it says it’s spherical “Then after that He made the earth like an egg” (79:30)
@@mzkhan93 51:47 " and the earth, we SPREAD it out" = some say flat. Can you spread an egg and keep it round 🤔
@@ScienceFan1859 meaning expand. The universe expanding.
Plenty of Christinas drink beer. Stop being so legalistic even though it was humorous
Everyone is a sinner
Where is the firmament? The bible says there is a firmament, it says the earth is flat, it says the earth is fixed and does not move. If the universe was created by gods the god of the bible was nothing to do with it.
Your drunk huh ?
Where do it say it's flat
No it doesn't
strawman