Climeworks - Capturing CO2 from air
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 4 มิ.ย. 2024
- Climeworks is capturing CO2 from air with the world’s first commercial carbon removal technology. Our direct air capture plants remove CO2 from the atmosphere to supply to customers and to unlock a negative emissions future.
We built and operate the world’s first commercial direct air capture plant in Hinwil (Switzerland), removing 900 tonnes of CO2 from ambient air per year (as seen in the video). Our plants capture atmospheric carbon with a filter, using mainly low-grade heat as an energy source.
The pure CO2 gas is sold to our customers in key markets, including: commercial agriculture, food and beverage industries, the energy sector and the automotive industry. Customers utilise this atmospheric CO2 in carbonated drinks or for producing carbon-neutral hydrocarbon fuels and materials. By using Climeworks’ CO2, our customers can reduce their overall emissions as well as lowering their dependence on fossil energy. Our plants are modular, scalable and can be located independently of emission sources, allowing security of supply wherever there is atmospheric air.
Importantly, our plants can be utilised for negative emissions, which will be vital in the quest to limit a global temperature rise of 2 °C. Compared to other carbon removal technologies, direct air capture does not depend on arable land, has a small physical footprint, and is fully scalable.
Founded by engineers, Christoph Gebald and Jan Wurzbacher, Climeworks has assembled the largest team of experts in the field and developed high-quality testing and production facilities.
We’ll keep working to realize our mission to capture one percent of global emissions by 2025.
Stay informed about the launch and the scale-up of our Iceland plant by joining the community:
/ climeworks
Don't forget to like, subscribe, and share with friends. And if you have any questions or suggestions, please leave them in the comments below. - วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี
Amazing technology, and great symbiotic model with greenhouse... it'll be great to see 1000s of such plants in countries with larger carbon footprint... maybe few plants outside densely populated cities, or next to agricultural hub... Will this become an open source technology in future?
This is likely a net CO2 production. This is why they are using someone else' waste heat and electricity. If they had to run from the grid, you would release more CO2 to generate the electricity to capture the CO2 with this equipment.
This technology paired with Nuclear Thorium Molten Salt Reactor technology would would circumvent this problem.
the extra energy is used for growing the plants. Else they would sell the gas to the beverage industry or to someone producing fuel. Of course removing the CO2 alltogether would cost extra money, resources, energy.
Thorium will likely not be available for energy production before 2075, if all goes well. Too far away
@@renardfurieux I have understood the same thing, although i also read that it could happen faster if governments made aggressive R&D investments in Gen4 Nuclear technology... which are not Thorium, but... same principle i imagine... more R&D developments will make anything happen faster.
When I was a kid I imagined walls of fans and filters to clean our atmosphere. 20 years later you guys built one. That is impressive.
Agreed. Well said.
Adrien Chauvet I was thinking putting huge filters over the exhaust fumes of power plants so we can remove the co2 as it goes up the pipe, and then filtered then mineralized and shoved into a soda drink or deep underground
When I was a kid they said an ice age was coming, the world would be dangerously overpopulated by 2000, and more recently that Florida would be under water. Imagine my surprise in 2019 when none of those predictions came true. CO2 based climate change is the latest hoax to steal your money and control your life. Other than that this technology is pretty cool.
@@arcturus9366 Lol, yes drink coal plant soda to save the world! Love it.
G Buz get educated first, comment second
Now don't let the politicians shut this down. Keep running. We need it!
The politicians will try to shut it down because they want to ruin the energy sector and the economy so they can take over. But CO2 based climate change is a hoax pushed by the politicians anyway. When we slip into a cold decade or two or three because of the solar minimum happening now (the sun control the climate, not greenhouse gases) then just remember I told you it was a hoax.
Just came across Climeworks, wow, just brings back a little hope for the planet! I really hope it becomes a huge success and creates an impact that would probably be the most important one in recent times.
When all carbon dioxide is removed from the air all plant life will be dead and gone forever ..but since plants are the only source we have for oxygen we will all suffocate to death . Co2 level is now 0.03% of only 1% of the air ..its not enough to keep plants live ..if we do not turn off direct co2 removal machines we will run low on oxygen and all of us will suffocate to death ..leaving this planet a barren lifeless rock with nothing alive in a very very short time
This fact has been known for over 300 years
I have three questions:
1. How many months of operation does this plant take to capture the carbon from the carbon-energy equivalent energy that went into fabricating and constructing this plant?
2. How much carbon from carbon-equivalent energy does it take to operate this plant for a year?
3. Is its carbon-energy equivalent carbon consumption greater than the carbon it "captures", but if less, what is the net difference of the "captured" carbon vs. its annual carbon-energy equivalent carbon operational output.
There you go with the full study. The analysis will be updated based on the latest data from the first industrial scale plant introduced in the video: oc1.mainbase.ch/index.php/s/1aCEkJp0n3kjwxP
Climeworks , just read the „study“. None of the above questions are answered. Please iterate further. Really interested in this technology.
@@Climeworks_official the link doesn't work.
Use google people
@@Climeworks_official
So it's been 2 years. I couldn't find any numbers on your webpage, but how much CO2 have you captured to date? Does this technology actually work? Has it been verified by a 3rd party? I'm genuinely interested.
This is beyond amazing! These setups need to be on every industrial roof top across the world. Please keep pushing tis technology.
You are hero for our earth. I glad to listen your technology news.
Combining Waste incinerator with CO2 capture to run and feed a green house! Pure genius!!!! 💗
This is one of those things that can be improved inevitably, in line with the years of dedicated research
We need more of these to deal with the UKs CO2 shortages.
Amazing technology to reduce global warming. You have shown a way to future generations. I hope that this technology will be adopted by every city.
Agreed
Don't be fooled, CO2 climate change is a hoax. How about a nuclear plant in every city? That is cheaper, cleaner, and better on the environment. No? Then you are ignorant and a pawn to the globalist pushing the hoax.
one of my non 'save earth' friends suggested me this channel cause they knew I'm into this stuff, cant thank him enough
My thoughts; there should be one of these Co2 machines directly connected to/located in the best possible location to capture/remove/reduce/change Co2 emissions. The excess already in our atmosphere disrupting the delicate balance will be corrected by the earth naturally if we help on all levels.
CO2 is an essential and therefore valuable raw material so long as it is concentrated and at the location it is needed. You can convert it to fuel, plastics, accelerate and increase greenhouse plant yields or inject it underground to flush out oil. Sure you can capture CO2 from a power station but it won't be near your oil well nor your dessert solar plant.
We must have carbon-based fuels at least until nuclear fission makes a comeback or nuclear fusion is developed and there is a worldwide power grid. These will not happen in my lifetime. Solar and wind power cannot meet our needs ever. They take too much space, they are unreliable, and take massive resources to build, repair and replace.
If energy costs are near parity for carbon-capture technology, (micro-based fuel are similar to this technology), then it might make sense for limited use.
Whatever they are doing is speechless. You are doing in a big level and I hope other countries will also take special steps to protect our future.
Kudos to the guys who bravely imagined and executed this.
If the world can figure out how to get this scaled, perhaps economics will become favorable.
And also, somehow figure out how to use a large portion of the captured CO2 for useful products like concrete which can also sequester it for a long time.
Bravo!
Not to be a pessimist, but if you use a machine to collect co2 that requires electricity. Are you really getting anywhere with the problem?
The whole idea sounds great, but how much CO2 do you need to built one collector?
Interesting, Does this technology require nitrogen to be present in the air?
I was originally wondering if it was possible to filter CO2 from an almost 100% O2 atmosphere at ~0.4 bar without breaking it down so it could be moved to a greenhouse, which might be nice for a lunar colony or some such, and this could suggest it should be possible. Though I have no idea if similar technology could work on filtering the O2 out of the greenhouse.
This kind of endeavor should be supported and financed by the world's billionaires and governments. Each city should have at least a thousand units of these Co2-capturing instruments. The benefits are incalculable.
My thanks to Mr. Loring, my 6th grade teacher who taught me the laws of thermodynamics.
Thank you Tyrion for saving our world!
Lol, CO2 can't destroy the world. It is scientifically impossible. Rising CO2 has increased crop yield 15%, that is saving the world.
😂
is it possible to put one of these filters on top of the chimney of a factory that release a lot of co2 and if it is then by what time will this tech be ready? it would run from the electricity produced by the factory only
What sorbent you are using for DAC?
Hi! Jaz Wurzbacher said in the beginning of the video that 10 giga tons of CO² must be removed from the atmosphere every year. What is the overall picture (the amount needed to be removed in total)?
7,500 tones of CO2 a year is incredibly small in regards to the negative emission levels we need HOWEVER this technology seems to be the only way forward for humanity I totally believe
So it's been 2 years. I couldn't find any numbers on your webpage, but how much CO2 have you captured to date? Does this technology actually work? Has it been verified by a 3rd party? I'm genuinely interested.
Everything is cool! Grant taken! We are traveling by our new yacht now!
1.1 billion vehicles worldwide,
× 4 tons average exhaust of CO2
YEARLY.
Just from vehicles alone is 4.4 billion tons of C02.
I'm convinced this a good start....but humankind needs to implement. NOW.
whats your special absorbent, is it ethanolamine?
Just out of curiosity, how many years after factory build does it become carbon neutral,? And start making a dent in co2 emissions?
Just a question is it possible for you to build units for people who believe in this movement and want to help? I think if people could get involved they would. Or if people could have like a subscription service to offset their use? Like $10 a month and upward?
it's like Oxygen not Included but in real life
great job, Climeworks
how many tons of co2 are used by the processes and materials to build one of these engines? in other words, how long does it take one of these machines to undo its own impact?
Can it be used to produce synthetic fuels in economic manner without adding additional co2 into atmosphere
Lol this is brilliant...you remove CO2 from the air where it's supposedly horrible...to sell to a farm down the road where you correctly point out that plants actually thrive and need more CO2 than what's currently in the air...so the CO2 you spent incredible amounts of energy to capture is now back in the plants and they thank you for it, and no-one seems to be confused by that... The only positive difference is in your wallet I guess, and you look like heroes doing it, just brilliant guys, well done, it's like a giant rube-goldberg machine for money!
Very good job guys! Looking forward to see this technology woldwide :)
Nice work, I hope you are ultra successful. Well done on your invention and company!
Is it inspired by the Atmospheric Condenser in Astroneer?
Keep up the good work. Also, keep an eye open for any news on Romania... I heard on the news that Romania is considering investing into a CO2 technologies with EU funds... Good luck!
This is truly amazing technology.
Will ti work for renewable energy.
Set it down where we are scrubing collect exhaust and use fo combustion improve efficiency.
Is this goal for the totality of co2 emissions or is this just in that year alone
“Human history becomes more and more a race between education and catastrophe.” An idea like this could literally save our planet.
Question - could these be attached directly to industrial chimneys?
this is great guys!
makes me feel slightly more optimistic....
no, look at CO2 emissions each year and you will find that this does nothing
By their own admission it is the world's first. Someone has to lead the way before others can design something better.
Aiden Burgess oh like ur an expert
unfortunately the co2 has to be stored underground.. a horrible idea
Don't worry Sam it is a hoax. Nothing is going to happen to you even if we do nothing. For your own peace of mind research it. Look at www.heartland.org/Center-Climate-Environment/index.html and 100s of videos on TH-cam scientifically explaining why CO2 climate change is a hoax.
The co2 is produced faster than it is used so small steps may help like switching off engines at traffic signals
is it possible to turn the co2 into carbon fibers?
Who to use technelogy in small expermental for student
I like the direction this technology is going.
Nuclear reactors are an excellent way to produce greenhouse gas free electricity and they could power these carbon scrubbers.
New advances such as small modular reactors built on an assembly line and trucked out to sites around the globe that could be as common as a Walmart or a hospital. Truly enabling a local power grid coupled with wind and solar.
Make no mistake that there are forces that want to make nuclear power so expensive that it's not viable.
When you look at the worst case scenarios of Chernobyl and Fukushima you can see that nuclear power is truly not the boogeyman that people want to make it out to be, but rather the overreaction to an accident.
I recommend podcasts such as Titans of Nuclear and lots of TH-cam channels educating on how nuclear power works, including the economics.
I would much rather live next door to a nuclear power plant than a coal or natural gas plant.
Is it economical to make diesel fuel from captured carbon dioxide
The fuel to power it? Diesel
Keep up the good work guys
Can they build that under cars for clean air , this will target one of the sources of co2
Good luck, sounds like a great idea!
I would love to see a video about the process when you store Co2 under ground. The fans look really nice and high tech. But seeing a video about the final goal would be really great. Is there a video about it?
This is amazing. I wonder, will this technology make any damages to the ground where the co2 will be stored. Would like hear about this part more.
Brilliant!
Just heard a spokesperson say current cost is $600US/tonne. Makes renewables more and more attractive.
How about instead of storing CO2 underground, convert it into dry ice and store it in an open to reduce temperature? Is that feasible?
How interesting! so this machine captureCO2 from the atmosphere and what happen then? do you almacenate CO2 or reuse it or create lowcarbon energy source? I'd be glad if you reply me :)
here is one idea for what to do with the captured Co2 www.blueplanet-ltd.com/
How much electricity is needed to power these plants?
Is it only me that finds it strange that a filter system to extract CO2 from ambient air (CO2 concentration ca. 450 ppm) is installed next to the chimney of an incinerator which sends an off-gas with 12-15% CO2 into the air all year round? I'm sure it would have been much more cost effective for the gardener to directly use the CO2 from the incinerator. Even with some investment to further purify the off-gas.
This is brilliant.
I agree it is great technology but it will never get anywhere because it solves a non-problem and the powers that be aren't trying to solve the non-problem, they are trying to extort money and power.
This will help to reverse climate change
God damn I liked the warm summers :(
Please save world. You can do it.🙏🙏🙏🙏
I'm between college student and high school student in japan and I will enter Hokkaido university through an examination.I have a dream that prevent from global warming.So I want to work for saving the earth in there.But I don't know what should I do to work in there. And what university should I go to study related domain.This sentence may be strange but would you tell me advice please?
what's the catch? it releases more c02 to do this doesn't it?
Side emissions are well below 10% of the CO2 that is captured by the system: oc1.mainbase.ch/index.php/s/1aCEkJp0n3kjwxP
I am assuming the catch it is far more expensive energy than any other source. On the positive side, it probably takes up far less land than solar or wind farming, and is far, far, far, far, cheaper than The Green New Swindle.
nice... is there a way for current cars to capture CO2 and use it as fuel? like perpetual energy for cars and possibly all device that require electriciy.... I would love to throw my own take and possibly more once I fully grasp how this pioneering technology works. Perpetual energy is the way to go and this technology is the first evidence that it can be done.
Where are they going to get the steel, wiring, plastic, concrete etc etc etc to build these things with? At some point the process of sucking the C02 becomes moot, if this process takes more time & uses the resources that are creating the problem in the first place. This becomes sort of nonsense, the only people making out on this will be those making $$$ selling to the big Soda pop giants, pharms, gas and oil. It's a slippery slope of will one outweigh the other. In mind, no. If the only way this is profitable is by the continuing burn of fossil fuels, how does this change a thing?
I wonder why Indonesian government not apply this technology when it’s already made. And put in Kalimantan or sumatra. I don’t know what they thinking about smoke grown bigger by years. It’s not about the cost, it’s all about humanity.
Your ,my and other 3rd world countries are made to decompose the waste of all first world countries and your politicians are paid well
Let's get real - the average USA citizen emits 15 tons of CO2 per year and DAC is about $500 per ton
so the bill for a family of 4 is about $30 thousand per year, if all the CO2 that needs to
be buried to get back to less than 300 ppm in the air was solidified with the same density as water
it would form a film over 1mm thick over the entire surface of the planet...
Great informative video. What else is captured?
Hey, Hope everything is good. I was wondering if your company is offering an intern positions. Would be glad to hear.
Why not capture directly at the source? Like at coal power plants exhaust.
That's dope af
Trees capure co2 yes but in the winter or when they die they releas the same amount of co2 or twice the amount
Amazing 👌
Doesn't it make more sense to filter the CO2 out of the exhaust gases of the waste incineration plant (much higher CO2 concentration) and to use the energy output of the waste incinerator as a substitute for fossil power plants? I mean, if the energy output of the incinerator is missing somewhere else and the energy gap has to be filled with natural gas or coal, the the whole project is a so called "Milchmädchenrechnung", isn't it? How much CO2 can be captured from the air with 1 MWh of electric and heat energy input?
Question
How much CO2 is produced by power plant during powering this machine?
This situation is similar to electric cars.
Pople often forget that in order to produce electric power a lot of CO2 is produced by power plant.
And also to build and maintain this plant? Did anyone calculate? :)
You always need energy to start a machine or process. But then the energy flows is inverted. It´s like in fusion or atomic energy.
We analyzed the question in a study in collaboration with the University of Stuttgart through a life cycle analysis. The grey emissions from the construction, operation and disposal of our plants are below 10% of the CO2 that is captured.
Capt Ron, "scientist" is not a "global warming job."
That's like calling an English teacher someone who works in an "illiteracy job."
Is this study available? Can i download it?
How much do one of these carbon collector's cost?
This sounds like it would be more efficient if it was attached to Smokestacks of the Waste Incinerator.
Wait if this cost and energy effective process. That CO2 would be useful for Synthetic Fuels for Fuel Cells. Continue the great work to make it scalable and see if its viable.
That is a massively large and complex chemistry topic. It's like asking Explain Metallurgy. But to start with there is two major ways to generate fuels, Reverse Cycle Fuel Cells or Fischer-Tropsch process (massive category).
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solid_oxide_fuel_cell
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fischer%E2%80%93Tropsch_process
navaltoday.com/2016/06/09/us-navy-works-on-enabling-ships-to-produce-fuel-from-seawater-obtains-first-patent/ (F-T process)
When you burn a log of wood you are using the fuel (stored carbon) to create energy and placing the carbon back in the air. That is just one very simple example of how carbon can be used as fuel that we have all experienced. Most all fuel is using carbon, and there is a chemical process for taking pure CO2 and creating a fuel with it.
CO2 plus hydrogen from electrolysis can be reacted to produce fuels. Copper Zink catalysts produced methanol which can be converted to gasoline via MTG or the sabatier reaction can produce methane. Hundreds of ways.
We must to have these in multi-area in a lot of area in Thailand for decrease high risk danger from respiratory from PM 2.5 especially in Chiang Mai, Bangkok and some area in Northeast.
The system is not to remove dust but CO2 from ambient air
@@christophsprenger9377 Thank you.
Is there a machine like this that will clean the air ?
I am reminded of alchemy, cargo cults and sacrificing virgins.
Sonhando com um dia em que podemos ter um desse em cada casa e possamos ajudar a vida na Terra a continuar a existir.
Großartig!
What's the link so I can buy some
Can't we capture a bit more than 1% that sounds a bit small?
Thid needs to be done om huge scale. Instead of flying to thr m
Moon or Mars WE should convert remote area like Siberia into CO2 cleaning area with its own power supply etc
#narenderamodi #india
Now this many years later they are able to turn the CO² into a liquid fuel
The problem is toxic soot.
CO2 is Mother Nature its cleanest end product.
CO2 greens the planet
@@marcelmolenaar5684 2:06 They even say, that plants are growing better with higher CO2 concentrations. So they know that it's not a problem at all.
Trees obviously do the same thing but with many other benefits, however why not plant trees and use these machines in desert areas powered by solar with batteries for nighttime as well?
That's a great idea! But tell me what about it, it's about money or ecology. Who gives money for this project. What is the price for 1 kg of CO2?
Not only the trees but also these machine , wow ....
Question is , we still needs trees in this world right ??
what about planting trees?
i want this machinery and efficiency reports.my daily co2 requirement is 103.9 MT .CAN YOU MAKE IT
We need a collector on the side of each house, school, building
that's great save the earth
And how many CO2 is produced to supply the electricity to your huge fans and process?!
Is at least positive?!
Alexandre Fernandes Compressing/liquefying COx and NOx emissions from ICEs can be accomplished without producing any further greenhouse gas emissions, by using waste heat generated by the ICE and converting it to electricity via thermocouples. Current thermoelectric technology is 33% efficient (implies a thermoelectric potential of 2.6), assuming tin-selenide is utilized.