vortex Solo 8x25 vs Vortex Solo 10x36 monocular comparison

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 1 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 19

  • @jimf1964
    @jimf1964 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I tried them both at Sail, and they both seemed the same, so must be something wrong. But the larger front lens will give a brighter image. I’m thinking of getting the 10x36 with reticle. It’s cool that you can range things with it, but I don’t really want a reticle. It’s just the housing is much heavier duty, and has a way nicer eyecup

  • @вечная_мерзлота
    @вечная_мерзлота ปีที่แล้ว +5

    tour car window is a problem.
    try to have no glass in between .

  • @Climax510
    @Climax510 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Can't tell the difference through the cell phibe camera but I definitely believe you. Thanks so much bro

  • @look_into_the_future
    @look_into_the_future ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you for a good video review of Vortex monoculars.

  • @slavoslavik4353
    @slavoslavik4353 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I have a vortex 8x 25 for 6 years. and I'm not satisfied, you're right, the picture is not sharp enough. up to 200m is ok.

    • @kishascape
      @kishascape ปีที่แล้ว

      No he's not. It's a very clear thank you.

  • @Bıçaklar_Aletler
    @Bıçaklar_Aletler ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Dürbünle Gözlem Yaparken Arada Cam Pencere Olmamalı,Görüntüde Renk Saçaklanması Olur.

  • @whereswaldo5740
    @whereswaldo5740 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    You might try cleaning the 8x

    • @kishascape
      @kishascape ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Also 10x25 more than enough light. I use on heavily clouded days all the time.

    • @genuser9758
      @genuser9758 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@kishascape I guess it depends on your eyesight. Some people may have worse eyesight and require a brighter image.

  • @SuperHyperExtra
    @SuperHyperExtra 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I have the 8 x 36. Good quality. Some chromatic aberration, not the greatest FOV, close focus is so-so, no lens caps. But I like it. Replace nearly all the time my B&L 8x42 binoculars. Coupled with my small Pentax Papilio (extraordinary close focus!), perfect for what I do.

    • @jimf1964
      @jimf1964 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Have you tried the 10x36 ret version? I’m not wild about the fact there is a reticle, though it is cool to be able to range objects, but the housing is way better and they eye cup too, but I don’t know if it’s worth the extra cost

  • @theguuchful
    @theguuchful 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks for video.

  • @a45456565
    @a45456565 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you😺

  • @pythonoptic
    @pythonoptic ปีที่แล้ว

    wanna try our Range Master Ultra HD?

    • @That216Kid
      @That216Kid 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I do

  • @iancurrie8844
    @iancurrie8844 ปีที่แล้ว

    I see a lot of chromatic aberration on both of those. Cheap plastic chinese optics. Crap.

    • @Majuubean
      @Majuubean 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      whats better for the price?

    • @jimf1964
      @jimf1964 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Are all versions made in china? I was looking into the 10x36 RT version.